I like Breitling look way better than Rolex its not about the money. I can afford both Breitling and Rolex but i decided to go with breitling because of the look
I am 100% with you. I associate Rolex with Russian oligarchs and hookers, I could never wear one. I own several Breitling's and live them. For my wife, I love she wears Patek.
I had Rolex Daytona 116520 model, honestly I don’t see nothing special with Rolex, I bought Casio Pro trek PRW-60YT-1JF and Damm Casio looks so much better and high quality build, specifically for the model I bought and 100 times cheaper, I been getting many compliments too with Casio, but I do drooling 🤤 over BREITLING Navitimer model, soon I will buy one for sure, I just need to narrow my navitimer selection, too many models to pick 😁
when you wear a rolex, you keep getting asked "is that a real one" the breitling is a "gentlmans watch" the rolex is mostly worn by footballers, publicans, petty gangsters.
Not really. Breitling watches are overpriced for what they are. Mostly all lose value by 70% if you buy them brand new. If you want to buy one without haemorrhaging your money get a pre-owned one at a good deal. Rolex is an investment.
@@lancedsouza1547Of course pre-owned saves you money. Did you read my post? Only a mug pays £11/13k for a pre-owned steel sub that retails at £9k! Particularly when you have an Avenger b01 for half that - £6k. The sub is not a £6k better watch or are you going to tell me it is? I have several breitlings haven't lost 70% on any of them. One of my first bought in the noughties, a now discontinued model has lost about £500. Do tell me which models lose 70%?
@@philc1773 Why bring pre owned Rolex prices into it to exaggerate your point? Sub is 100% a £3k better watch, but just buy a Breitling if you do not agree. Save the £3k for servicing costs though maybe.
@@wristopia4101 Absolute nonsense! The sub is not a better watch than a b01 Avenger chronograph. Are you honestly telling me the sub caliber 3235 is better than the Avenger b01s movement? Well it's not and Rolex Sub quality is not £3k better than the Avenger either, and when you factor aftermarket nonsense, well its plain madness to buy the sub....Ego buys the sub date Smart people get the Avenger chronograph.
@@philc1773 There you go with the pre owned stuff again. You start off saying 'watch' and then go to 'movement'. Which is it? Just get a Tudor BB Chronograph with an improved B01 in it ;) Do you own any of theses watches, or work with them enough to form your opinions?
Strange there is no mention of the Navitimer but they show a shot of one at the end. Practically any Rolex looks like a toy on my 21cm wrist. Love my 46mm Navitimer.
I love my 48 mm super avenger ll,also very pleased with the chronograph 44 from 2016,both absolutely stunning watching,eye catchers,got lot of compliments for the both of them. The very last line of Breitling watches has become somehow feminine or gender fluid in my opinion,not really a fan of it!
Talking about divers watches I would include de Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean instead of the omega you choose. Additionally it should have included the Panerai submersible or at least the luminor. This comparison was made for the Rolex to win. You choose the most iconic watch of one of the most famous brands in the world and compared against others entry level brands watches. Sugestión, compare the most iconic watches of the most famous brands (Rolex Submariner Vs. Breitling Navitimer 01 Vs. Omega Moon Watch Vs. Hublot Big Bang Ceramic Vs. Panerai Luminor Marina, and maybe include an IWC as well) I would leave out the AP and Patek due to the price range.
if you are going to own one watch I would say buy a Rolex Explorer or a steel sub. More than one, then Brietling and Rolex work great in any collection. Between the two you will check all the boxes for having an awesome watch collection. Everything else becomes a matter of preference or opinion. spend what you want, wear what you want, for whatever reason you want. A WATCH IS A BEAUTIFUL THING
I don't get all the negative comments about one or the other. I can afford either or both, but prefer Breitling. I have a Navitimer 46, which sounds big, and it is, but I love the way it wears on my 7.5 inch wrist. Also have an Avenger II 43 which I also love. I will say it was expensive to service at about 7 or 8 years, but worth it to me. Haven't had to service the Navi. I think Rolex has several models that appeal to me, 41 mm is big enough, but somehow still looks a little small on me. I say get what you like for whatever reason you like it. No need to justify your taste. No need to criticize someone else's choice.
Have a Breitling and want a Rolex… there is no alternative to datejust 36 with jubilee with riffled lunette… guys if you want a luxury watch, buy exactly the one you want. There are no alternatives for nothing.
I have both, Breitling Chronograph and Rolex Daytona, similar from some point but different very different …. Rolex beyond compare for weekends and special occasions, Breitling for the rest, just my opion…..but I can’t compare these 2, price of first one 30% of the second one, so …
If my memory serves me right their is only one part in their watches that Rolex does not make themselves and that is the mainspring! I believe what you are confusing is Breitling and Tudor working together movement wise. All the best.
For a diver the race is won by Rolex before it even started. Superior quality and superior design of their Sea-Dweller makes any comparison totally unnecessary. You get what you pay for.
Breitling SuperOcean is amazing. It is actually better made with a screw down bezel and so forth.. I also prefer Breitling sapphire treatment. It is the best in the business. I own a Sea Dweller and love it. It is the best Rolex ever made imo. But when you assess what you get for the money, Breitling is the far better choice. Both excellent pieces tho.
@@ashleychambers7602 The £4.5k Tudor Chronograph has the same movement (actually slightly improved). The Breitling line up is littered with low specs v cost. Generic movements 2 year warranties 38 hour power reserves Extortionately priced quartz watches Do you at least agree on the servicing cost difference with Rolex? Am not a Daytona fan, but would easily rather buy one than a Breitling, regardless of cost. 'Just as good as a Daytona' is a bit of a stretch. Is the Tudor just as good too then? I am happy enough with the Tudor though, even with the rough feeling Breitling B01 inside it.
@@tortellofer I have not really heard much said about its movement being super special (I agree its a good movement) but like I said, an improved version is in my Tudor, and its not smooth to use. The BO1 does not negate any of my other points. I love that Breitling invented the modern day chronograph crown/pusher design, and fantastic if you love the brand ;)
Rolex are like Apple ! Marketing geniuses creating demand for their product …whereas Breitling are more like Samsung. As good if not better but without the want / need
I would put money that both watches would last the same , the problem is rolex dick riders keep prices going on , i have breitling , omega , and AP any thing anything over a fuck boy rolex .
I have a problem with the image and brand of Rolex....think Russian gangsters, drug dealers, high end hookers and corrupt politicians. Breitling, for me at least represents style and heritage. I have a few Brietlings and hope to be getting my next soon.
Rolex and their elitist marketing and belief that even though you buy the watch they still should be able to stop you selling on the Grey market finished any interest I had in Rolex. The RUclips Rolex fan boys come across as immature and over sell the product only out done by “collectors”. Both should reassess their self confidence and get their priorities in order and maybe give a little back to the communities from which their money came.
![Oasis - Oasis Live '25 [Official Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gol_JnuEtKM/mqdefault.jpg)
I like Breitling look way better than Rolex its not about the money. I can afford both Breitling and Rolex but i decided to go with breitling because of the look
I am 100% with you. I associate Rolex with Russian oligarchs and hookers, I could never wear one. I own several Breitling's and live them. For my wife, I love she wears Patek.
Must be nice. Where I come from.. & still not far away from 25yrs later, we're lucky to have a smartwatch. Lol stay blessed 💯
I had Rolex Daytona 116520 model, honestly I don’t see nothing special with Rolex, I bought Casio Pro trek PRW-60YT-1JF and Damm Casio looks so much better and high quality build, specifically for the model I bought and 100 times cheaper, I been getting many compliments too with Casio, but I do drooling 🤤 over BREITLING Navitimer model, soon I will buy one for sure, I just need to narrow my navitimer selection, too many models to pick 😁
Can't compare them. I prefer the breitling looks
when you wear a rolex, you keep getting asked "is that a real one" the breitling is a "gentlmans watch" the rolex is mostly worn by footballers, publicans, petty gangsters.
Many people pick the Rolex based on the brand name. Breitling is for the connoisseurs.
They are both amazing, but I prefer Breitling.
Only a mug overspends on a Rolex, when you can have Breitling comparable quality for much less.
Smart people buy Breitling... Ego buys Rolex!
Not really. Breitling watches are overpriced for what they are. Mostly all lose value by 70% if you buy them brand new. If you want to buy one without haemorrhaging your money get a pre-owned one at a good deal.
Rolex is an investment.
@@lancedsouza1547Of course pre-owned saves you money. Did you read my post?
Only a mug pays £11/13k for a pre-owned steel sub that retails at £9k! Particularly when you have an Avenger b01 for half that - £6k. The sub is not a £6k better watch or are you going to tell me it is?
I have several breitlings haven't lost 70% on any of them. One of my first bought in the noughties, a now discontinued model has lost about £500. Do tell me which models lose 70%?
@@philc1773 Why bring pre owned Rolex prices into it to exaggerate your point?
Sub is 100% a £3k better watch, but just buy a Breitling if you do not agree.
Save the £3k for servicing costs though maybe.
@@wristopia4101 Absolute nonsense! The sub is not a better watch than a b01 Avenger chronograph. Are you honestly telling me the sub caliber 3235 is better than the Avenger b01s movement?
Well it's not and Rolex Sub quality is not £3k better than the Avenger either, and when you factor aftermarket nonsense, well its plain madness to buy the sub....Ego buys the sub date Smart people get the Avenger chronograph.
@@philc1773 There you go with the pre owned stuff again.
You start off saying 'watch' and then go to 'movement'. Which is it?
Just get a Tudor BB Chronograph with an improved B01 in it ;)
Do you own any of theses watches, or work with them enough to form your opinions?
Strange there is no mention of the Navitimer but they show a shot of one at the end. Practically any Rolex looks like a toy on my 21cm wrist. Love my 46mm Navitimer.
I have the same problem but breilings 46mm watches look awesome on my large wrist
A real man wears a Rolex Deep Sea Sea Dweller (Black Dial Only)......
@@thetruthhurts7500 spoken like a true woman 😂😂😂
@@ashleychambers7602 or someone with identity issues.
I love my 48 mm super avenger ll,also very pleased with the chronograph 44 from 2016,both absolutely stunning watching,eye catchers,got lot of compliments for the both of them.
The very last line of Breitling watches has become somehow feminine or gender fluid in my opinion,not really a fan of it!
Breitling is much older than Rolex too.
Talking about divers watches I would include de Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean instead of the omega you choose. Additionally it should have included the Panerai submersible or at least the luminor.
This comparison was made for the Rolex to win. You choose the most iconic watch of one of the most famous brands in the world and compared against others entry level brands watches.
Sugestión, compare the most iconic watches of the most famous brands (Rolex Submariner Vs. Breitling Navitimer 01 Vs. Omega Moon Watch Vs. Hublot Big Bang Ceramic Vs. Panerai Luminor Marina, and maybe include an IWC as well)
I would leave out the AP and Patek due to the price range.
I would rather have a ROLAX than a RolEx.
if you are going to own one watch I would say buy a Rolex Explorer or a steel sub. More than one, then Brietling and Rolex work great in any collection. Between the two you will check all the boxes for having an awesome watch collection. Everything else becomes a matter of preference or opinion. spend what you want, wear what you want, for whatever reason you want.
A WATCH IS A BEAUTIFUL THING
I'm going with the explorer 36 and navitimer 41 ... oddly the explorer costs more but most ppl would assume it wad the breitling because of the polish
I don't get all the negative comments about one or the other. I can afford either or both, but prefer Breitling. I have a Navitimer 46, which sounds big, and it is, but I love the way it wears on my 7.5 inch wrist. Also have an Avenger II 43 which I also love. I will say it was expensive to service at about 7 or 8 years, but worth it to me. Haven't had to service the Navi. I think Rolex has several models that appeal to me, 41 mm is big enough, but somehow still looks a little small on me. I say get what you like for whatever reason you like it. No need to justify your taste. No need to criticize someone else's choice.
You show Breitling's most iconic watch, the Navitimer, several times but don't profile it. Why?
Lascio Rolex a chi segue la massa ed a chi spesso non ama l’orologio in se ma il simbolo che rappresenta.
Breitling tutta la vita ❤️
my Breitling Avenger 42 is the greatest watch on planet earth,i love it
It doesn't matter, I'm buying one of each... Breitling Crono GMT & a Rolex Yachtmaster
Rolex is a far superior “brand” but the quality, movement and value I would say Breitling.
So not superior
That is akin to saying the best restaurant in town is outstanding except for the food, the service, and the prices.
I prefer the sapphire treatment, overall looks and dials of the Breitling. I prefer Rolex bracelets and clasps. 🤷
Have a Breitling and want a Rolex… there is no alternative to datejust 36 with jubilee with riffled lunette… guys if you want a luxury watch, buy exactly the one you want. There are no alternatives for nothing.
I’m the opposite, I have a datejust 36 with fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet, but I want a navitimer
Owned 2 Rolexes.... underwhelming watches to own. If you are used to antireflective coatings, the Rolex will look very cheap to you.
witnessing last several years disgraceful ROLEX marketing practices, I sold my three and will NEVER but another one. A disgrace!
This is a wonderful piece. Keep up the good work child of God.
Rolex always look cheap and tacky, pimps or egos watch, nearly every other watch looks classy compared to rolex. Breitling/Omega for me all the way.
100% agree. I looked at several watches. Comparing the Superocean Heritage 2 with a sub I would have to be a fool to get the sub.
I have both, Breitling Chronograph and Rolex Daytona, similar from some point but different very different …. Rolex beyond compare for weekends and special occasions, Breitling for the rest, just my opion…..but I can’t compare these 2, price of first one 30% of the second one, so …
How many people use these so called diving watches for diving? Laughable 😂
Absolutely no one, lol.
In the shower yes.
Diving category would be submariner 100% . Chronograph would be navitimer hands down.
Breitling for Life
1:04 you spelled "Rolex" wrong...
This is a ridiculous question. Just buy what brand you like
Awesome video
The credit showing the two watch brands spelled Rolex like this - "Rolax".
Doesn't Rolex use Breitling to make their chronographs in their watches?
Definitely no
If my memory serves me right their is only one part in their watches that Rolex does not make themselves and that is the mainspring! I believe what you are confusing is Breitling and Tudor working together movement wise. All the best.
Tudor uses the Breitling B01 movement.
For a diver the race is won by Rolex before it even started. Superior quality and superior design of their Sea-Dweller makes any comparison totally unnecessary. You get what you pay for.
You never get what you pay for.
You get at max the half.
In a Rolex diver you get superior prestige and superior quality. This combination is what you pay for.
Breitling SuperOcean is amazing. It is actually better made with a screw down bezel and so forth.. I also prefer Breitling sapphire treatment. It is the best in the business. I own a Sea Dweller and love it. It is the best Rolex ever made imo. But when you assess what you get for the money, Breitling is the far better choice. Both excellent pieces tho.
1:05 Rolax
This is the play. Get your name in with Rolex because it will take a while. Buy the Breitling then when it’s about time for a new watch Rolex may call
I have aba Breitling sublet and rolex. wear a shock err day errday@
@1:05 it says "Rolax"
😂😂 your title said ROLAX
Breitling are very expensive for the specs and the specs are often low.
Servicing costs are very high too.
Absolute rubbish, you can buy a Breitling B01 chronograph for approx £6k which is just as good as the massively inflated price of a Daytona
@@ashleychambers7602 The £4.5k Tudor Chronograph has the same movement (actually slightly improved).
The Breitling line up is littered with low specs v cost.
Generic movements
2 year warranties
38 hour power reserves
Extortionately priced quartz watches
Do you at least agree on the servicing cost difference with Rolex?
Am not a Daytona fan, but would easily rather buy one than a Breitling, regardless of cost.
'Just as good as a Daytona' is a bit of a stretch.
Is the Tudor just as good too then?
I am happy enough with the Tudor though, even with the rough feeling Breitling B01 inside it.
Breitling has one of the most regarded Chronographs movements in the market today known for its high precision and quality, the B01.
@@tortellofer I have not really heard much said about its movement being super special (I agree its a good movement) but like I said, an improved version is in my Tudor, and its not smooth to use.
The BO1 does not negate any of my other points.
I love that Breitling invented the modern day chronograph crown/pusher design, and fantastic if you love the brand ;)
What are you yapping on about 😂 breitling quality is second to none
There is no comparison. Who are you kidding?
Rolex are like Apple ! Marketing geniuses creating demand for their product …whereas Breitling are more like Samsung. As good if not better but without the want / need
also apple are better build quality
You are talking from an American person perspective,the rest of the world thinks differently
@@raymondbaxter7489😂😂😂 Wake Up 😂😂😂
One is hugely overpriced and intended to impress others while the other is horology masterclass
Not one word or picture of Breitlings most sold and famous model the Chronomat 44mm. Meaningless video.
1:05 'ROLAX'! 🤔 are you comparing Breitling with fake Chinese copy? 😮
No one ever asked this question 🤣😂🤣
Nope, notta one. I often ask myself, Oris or Breitling? Or even Tudor or Breitling? And I HAVE a Breitling...
Breitling sales people often get asked this question
I searched “ Rolex v Breitling” in youtube.
This is valid question for sure, unless one is a Watch snob
I too specifically searched this
This is old time AI made video?
1:05 Rolax 😂
Rolax?
avengers 4 me
It’s like comparing oranges to apples 🤣🤣🤣
I would put money that both watches would last the same , the problem is rolex dick riders keep prices going on , i have breitling , omega , and AP any thing anything over a fuck boy rolex .
I have a problem with the image and brand of Rolex....think Russian gangsters, drug dealers, high end hookers and corrupt politicians. Breitling, for me at least represents style and heritage. I have a few Brietlings and hope to be getting my next soon.
Is it a new Brand. ROLAX. You spelled it wrong buddy.
Rolax
Relógios magníficos são os Grand Seiko❤
The script sounds like bad A.I.
I'd take an Omega over both of them.
I like Omega and until recently would have agreed. Then I saw a Superocean Heritage 2…
I agree
RolAx??????
ROLAX !
Loads of major errors in the video.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Actually, Breitling typically lands far down the list of great watches.
No😂
Actually you talk utter CRAP
It's funny when a guy like you open your mouth and it comes 100% I don't know a shit what I'm taking about.
😂😂😂Wake Up 😂😂😂
😂
LOLeks
100% AI generated content. Do better
Omega all the way.
Rolex and their elitist marketing and belief that even though you buy the watch they still should be able to stop you selling on the Grey market finished any interest I had in Rolex.
The RUclips Rolex fan boys come across as immature and over sell the product only out done by “collectors”. Both should reassess their self confidence and get their priorities in order and maybe give a little back to the communities from which their money came.
I bought a Breitling Superocean Heritage 2. It just looked better than a Rolex sub and feels so much cooler. A classy watch rather than a cliche.
At 1:05 what is with the spelling of “Rolex”?, you have “Rolax”.
Hes taking the piss as in Rolax cheap imitation.