Are the numbers in the charts a measurement of something or just a coefficient that we need to figure out the relativity among the cells and adjust accordingly?
Another great video. Is there a way to put your ve over lay to make adjustments ( copy multiply by half) not change any values? Just thought if I'm making multiple pulls and tunes in the same area every time I paste and multiply that section would get bigger and be off scale or spiked up over time to create a big ol rich zone for the recorded cells? Or is multiplying by half so little that it wont matter?
You should be writing your changes so the next log you pull is using the updated tables so theoretically every log the amount should be less and less until it's negligible.
Bob Ross would be proud. lol This is similar how I tune my VE tables. In my experience the automatic VE calculations on older ECUs I have worked on are ok but far from perfect. Sometimes you will get a particular VE cell that is way different than the ones around it and you know that it is wrong. So you have to do a little bit of educated guesswork based on the VE cells around it to get a number that is more reasonable. If your logging supports it I look at the history average calculated VE in that cell based on the number of hits that VE cell received during logging.
Love the video and the picture thumbnail :; ... in SD do these numbers have any correlation to Stoichometric. I am doing exactly what you are doing over need in my boost being super rich. So I'm trying to lean it up yet smooth into the perimeter as you are.
Yes and no, lol! They do in that this is the figure the ecu looks at and says, okay we have that much air, it then looks at the stoich table to determine what ratio it needs to hit and it calculates the amount of fuel delivery. If you are are if target from your desired EQ this is where we adjust since we can't actually change the fuel delivery, per say, but we can change the amount if air the engine thinks it's taking in.
I would love to see what your VE table looks like when it's finished in three D. I have been remapping six liter for a friend of mine and Isee big changes in the table which makes my OCD kick in so I have used the smoothing function a couple of times. Anyways it would interest me. I have been watching and learning from your videos for a few weeks and I'm learning a bunch, Really excited with the results I'm getting- thanks
Don't obsess too much about it, the zones will cause it to look a bit wonky in places, just focus on getting it close and error on the rich side, we can let closed loop fix the partial throttle stuff and then PE just get it as close as you can to commanded without losing your mind. At the end of the day you'll have to have a "good enough" moment as you can't ever get it perfect when it comes to coefficients.
Are the numbers in the charts a measurement of something or just a coefficient that we need to figure out the relativity among the cells and adjust accordingly?
Great info! Currently debating on trying to tune my e40 ecm vette once I get it going.
It's easier than you think!
can you explain the differences in the program for MAP sensors ?
Thanks that helps
Well done
What would have happened if you didn't copy to manifold open?
Another great video. Is there a way to put your ve over lay to make adjustments ( copy multiply by half) not change any values? Just thought if I'm making multiple pulls and tunes in the same area every time I paste and multiply that section would get bigger and be off scale or spiked up over time to create a big ol rich zone for the recorded cells? Or is multiplying by half so little that it wont matter?
You should be writing your changes so the next log you pull is using the updated tables so theoretically every log the amount should be less and less until it's negligible.
Bob Ross would be proud. lol This is similar how I tune my VE tables. In my experience the automatic VE calculations on older ECUs I have worked on are ok but far from perfect. Sometimes you will get a particular VE cell that is way different than the ones around it and you know that it is wrong. So you have to do a little bit of educated guesswork based on the VE cells around it to get a number that is more reasonable. If your logging supports it I look at the history average calculated VE in that cell based on the number of hits that VE cell received during logging.
احسنت صديقي على ترجمة الفيديو الى العربي أنا متابع لقناتك من العراق
Love the video and the picture thumbnail :; ... in SD do these numbers have any correlation to Stoichometric. I am doing exactly what you are doing over need in my boost being super rich. So I'm trying to lean it up yet smooth into the perimeter as you are.
Yes and no, lol! They do in that this is the figure the ecu looks at and says, okay we have that much air, it then looks at the stoich table to determine what ratio it needs to hit and it calculates the amount of fuel delivery. If you are are if target from your desired EQ this is where we adjust since we can't actually change the fuel delivery, per say, but we can change the amount if air the engine thinks it's taking in.
Do you remote because I need some help
Heck yeah man. OSU. You live in Oklahoma? Sperry brother.
Not anymore, but I'm from the Enid area, most of my family and friends are still back there
I would love to see what your VE table looks like when it's finished in three D. I have been remapping six liter for a friend of mine and Isee big changes in the table which makes my OCD kick in so I have used the smoothing function a couple of times. Anyways it would interest me. I have been watching and learning from your videos for a few weeks and I'm learning a bunch, Really excited with the results I'm getting- thanks
Don't obsess too much about it, the zones will cause it to look a bit wonky in places, just focus on getting it close and error on the rich side, we can let closed loop fix the partial throttle stuff and then PE just get it as close as you can to commanded without losing your mind. At the end of the day you'll have to have a "good enough" moment as you can't ever get it perfect when it comes to coefficients.
Goat Rope Garage
Thanks for that I didn’t see your reply.
Go pokes!
I still think a meth tuning video would be good content if your looking for ideas . Keep the content coming !
I'll add it to the list!
Interpolate.
Enhance
wth am i looking at?
Minesweeper for gear heads 😂😂😂