Mil V-12 - Soviet rotorcraft titan

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 май 2024
  • The Mil V-12 (also known as the Mi-12) is a heavy transport helicopter created in the USSR in the late 1960s. The V-12 is the largest rotorcraft ever built and flown.
    The V-12 - the brainchild of the Mil design bureau, was created as a heavy transport for lifting heavy and large equipment in a pair with military transport airplanes. The result of this concept was a truly amazing helicopter in terms of size, weight and carrying capacity.
    In terms of dimensions, it is comparable to large airplane, and in terms of mass, it is many times greater than any other helicopter, including modern ones. Its distinctive feature is the transverse arrangement of the twin rotor power plant - two pairs of engines and propellers are installed on the tips of a large reverse narrowing wing. The V-12 has a large fuselage, a double-deck cockpit and a cargo compartment, dimensions of which are close to the cockpit of that time’s giant An-22 Antey.
    Subscribe to the channel, comment, and like!
    If you want to support Skyships and our work, welcome to our Patreon. We will create some special content for you there: / skyships
    Our Facebook: / skyshipscom
    Our Instagram: / skyships_world
    00:00 - The Soviet titans
    00:50 - Ambitions
    03:04 - Heavy transport concept
    06:52 - The V-12 description
    16:34 - Trials and development
    17:53 - Records and airshows
    20:01 - Aborted takeoff
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 743

  • @tinolino58
    @tinolino58 9 месяцев назад +15

    I was a member of the design bureau creating the tool machine (SH34) to cut the planetary and ring gear for the giant transmission of the Mi helicopters. This was 1977 in Zürich.

  • @nonamesplease6288
    @nonamesplease6288 Год назад +314

    I love that funky, 1960s era Soviet prototype paint job. The aqua greens and red combo and the style could only have come from that era.

    • @phunkracy
      @phunkracy Год назад +20

      Early Cold War soviet submarines were also painted aqua green!

    • @johnhickman106
      @johnhickman106 Год назад +16

      Their cockpits haven't changed. Just about every instrument and circuit breaker panel is the same green.

    • @ABrit-bt6ce
      @ABrit-bt6ce Год назад +4

      @@phunkracy Sub camouflage is/was a thing, in shallow water you are easy to spot visually from above so look like your surroundings.

    • @bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24
      @bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 Год назад +11

      I love the look of this machine. I've always thought the Soviets made some great looking machines.

    • @TheHandThatBites
      @TheHandThatBites Год назад +7

      Train stations, planes, government buildings. Everything is that colour lol.

  • @johankriel8883
    @johankriel8883 Год назад +75

    I attended the 1971 Paris air show and was fascinated by those gigantic helicopters.

    • @nikbg7221
      @nikbg7221 Год назад +17

      Only respect, you saw a golden era, sir!

  • @edwelndiobel1567
    @edwelndiobel1567 Год назад +24

    Crazy they did all this without computers or modeling systems. All by hand and math!

    • @Vontharau47
      @Vontharau47 9 дней назад +1

      Fascinating and impressive, indeed.

  • @air-headedaviator1805
    @air-headedaviator1805 Год назад +19

    Helicopters only get cool the bigger they get, and this is the biggest, so therefore the coolest

  • @timrussell1559
    @timrussell1559 Год назад +124

    The amount of skill and focus required to operate such a complex aircraft before the advent of modern day electronics must have been enormous. Hats off to the amazing pilots who accomplished this undoubtedly difficult task

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 Год назад +7

      This configuration was used by the Germans with the Focke-Achgelis Fa 223 Drache with 20 in service starting in 1941. Bombing destroyed the factory. It's quite a good configuration for a heavy lift helicopter. I think its actually quite easy to fly because there is not need to continiously adjust the tail rotor.

    • @morho9422
      @morho9422 Год назад

      well, they were adveturers.😀😀

    • @skyedog24
      @skyedog24 11 месяцев назад +6

      Not to mention all the slide rules and pocket protector pockets on the men who designed and engineered this beast.

  • @peraperic8775
    @peraperic8775 Год назад +11

    I have seen Mi26 in Niš,south Serbia. Was firefighting in here. That is a flying building. Can't even imagine Mil V12

  • @twistedyogert
    @twistedyogert Год назад +84

    One thing I admire about the USSR is that they always seemed to push the envelope of what was thought possible.

    • @mrobocop1666
      @mrobocop1666 Год назад +28

      They weren't limited much by cost effectiveness, demands of markets, strict control by owners and other capitalist things, so it allowed engineers to experiment and bring into reality their fly of imagination

    • @twistedyogert
      @twistedyogert Год назад +6

      @@mrobocop1666 I guess that's one advantage of communism. Although there were some issues with a planned economy. There was no competition between companies so consumer goods didn't really advance as far as technology is considered. Every advancement had to be approved by the government so there was a lot of red tape in the way of improvements.

    • @SMGJohn
      @SMGJohn Год назад +11

      ​@@twistedyogert
      Actually you are wrong, there was competition between design bureaus and between factories, however problem in USSR was everything was geared towards military production, all the best engineers, designers and inventors were working for the military industrial complex where they invented stuff way ahead of its time like 2 megapixel CCD sensors in the 70s for spy satellites, or various laser technologies which the USSR would be leader in.
      This is one of the reasons USSR collapsed, the people who put Yeltsin in power were army generals with powerful ties to the military industrial complex.

    • @klaussanta4027
      @klaussanta4027 Год назад +2

      В точку сэр...
      -Мы рождены чтоб сказку сделать былью!.. это кстати текст из ,,марш авиаторов,,

    • @HumanBeanbag
      @HumanBeanbag 11 месяцев назад +1

      This was a complete waste of time and resources. No wonder they collapsed.

  • @CaptHollister
    @CaptHollister Год назад +61

    In the 1970s I was an aviation-mad teenager. Living in Canada, I had easy access to aviation magazines from much of the world and the good fortune of being able to read and understand most of them. One of my favourites was a French mag. They did a full article on the Mil-12 accompanied with many pictures taken during one of its visits to Le Bourget. I have been fascinated by this beast ever since and I'm always happy to watch videos or read stories about it.

  • @justforever96
    @justforever96 Год назад +10

    My favorite thing about this channel isn't just the quality, but that you focus on aircraft that most western creators would ignore or not have access to. Makes it way more interesting than another documentary on the CH-47, basically just repeating what Wikipedia says with some photos and film clips added.

  • @Ivanoskyao
    @Ivanoskyao Год назад +10

    I grew up in Angola in the 80s under Russian supported government, with Russian military and Cuban soldiers. I remember so well this Helicopters and all the Soviet things. Actually looking back there were not bad days. I once flew on a military Russian Helicoper from Lobito to Luanda.during the War we had to fly close to coast all the time. A 5 hour flight, no seatbelts, fuel next to you and a machine gun at the door. Scary, but we made it.

  • @ericwhitehead6451
    @ericwhitehead6451 Год назад +414

    Soviet aerospace has always fascinated me. They always pushed the envelope a little bit further.

    • @tbas8741
      @tbas8741 Год назад

      its easier for communist countries as the value of life is much lower hence why so many pilot and workers killed in comparison to other countries.
      Like the multiple cosmonauts left to drift n die in space or crash back to earth.

    • @bastadimasta
      @bastadimasta Год назад +49

      The opposite is happening now. Aviation companies try to maximize gains from the same products over and over again. Boeing 737MAX is a good example of not wanting to improve.

    • @jakewatson2660
      @jakewatson2660 Год назад +9

      @@bastadimasta that is more of a fault of airlines. By using the 737 they don't need to retrain pilots

    • @bastadimasta
      @bastadimasta Год назад +17

      @@jakewatson2660 clients can demand anything from the manufacturer. It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to build a reliable, economical and safe product. If the client's demand is impossible, then the manufacturer must inform the client so.
      The worst thing that a manufacturer do is to supply a bad product to its clients without informing the risk of such a product, and people die for it. Boeing did exact that.

    • @tbas8741
      @tbas8741 Год назад +24

      @@bastadimasta WHAT!!
      737 Max is huge improvements over previous 737.
      New wing, new engines new computers new control systems.
      Much more fuel efficient, Much safer, Much cleaner (green wise) Low carbon impact in making them, Much improved passenger comfort.
      Clearly you only watch what the news says and know nothing about planes

  • @ouroboris
    @ouroboris Год назад +10

    Monino is on my Bucket List 😃

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 Год назад +54

    This amazing aircraft, set a world record for a vertical lift of 123,000lbs! Have to say that Monino is well worth a visit. Also went to MAKS while in Moscow and saw the SU-57 flying! Possibly the best holiday ever!!!

  • @dasgelbevomei4739
    @dasgelbevomei4739 Год назад +129

    I remember standing in front of this giant in Monino, but never knew how well preserved it is internally. I wish I had known there was a possibility to get inside.

  • @stuarttupp3541
    @stuarttupp3541 Год назад +311

    Considering how unprecedented the design was, the fact that both airframes are still in existence is a small miracle.
    Prototypes like these usually crash in a field somewhere.

    • @cpt_bill366
      @cpt_bill366 Год назад +24

      Or burned up in a airport like An-225 Mriya 😡

    • @BPJJohn
      @BPJJohn Год назад +18

      @@cpt_bill366 Don't worry, she'll rise again like a Phoenix. 😉

    • @physetermacrocephalus2209
      @physetermacrocephalus2209 Год назад +7

      @@cpt_bill366
      It sucks but we can always just build an even bigger plane later. We should not hold that against Russia forever.

    • @flywalkerent.9835
      @flywalkerent.9835 Год назад +14

      @@mikes989 +10 this is exactly true, not to mention the idiots in charge of the company who ignored all warnings of a coming war and decided to leave it in place

    • @darcgibson5099
      @darcgibson5099 Год назад

      @@cpt_bill366 i mean, if the Ukranians really want to completely erase history and deny and delete every remnant of their Soviet past (in which they were a willing founding member and biggest contributor & power alongside Russia) in exchange for a nazi-collaborationist’s version of Ukranian history that denies all their contributions to the world as a major soviet power, then they should destroy the AN family along with all the art, books, culture, buildings, statues, war memorials, etc etc. they have already banned and systematically destroyed. The governments post Maidan, post-USSR have mostly been made up of Banderites who would rather believe themselves “white” Western European “civilization” in line with the Nazis than they would appreciate their Slavic, mixed factual history in which they made great strides in all fields. Now their installed governments want to be nothing more than a knock-off Central European nazi heirloom and pathetic lapdog of the EU and USA.

  • @Tom-Lahaye
    @Tom-Lahaye Год назад +40

    The best in depth video about the V-12 yet.
    The cockpits almost look like a winter garden with the space, all the glass and the curtains to round it off, a very nice place for the crew indeed.

  • @citizenblue
    @citizenblue Год назад +10

    That thing looks like it could fuel up and go right now! Good to see it's still in as good shape as it is!

  • @John.0z
    @John.0z Год назад +8

    I recall this aircraft from my youth, and I had wondered then about why a tandem rotor design was not chosen. Thank you for answering that very old question.

  • @justforever96
    @justforever96 Год назад +12

    That cockpit interior is awesome! I love the white, it makes it so bright and open. I already noticed that awesome Soviet green cockpit color makes the interior brighter and less cramped, which is probably why they used it. The huge glass and white padding make it seem like a modern apartment interior.

    • @Pangolin_6483
      @Pangolin_6483 Год назад +7

      A separate story is connected with the blue-green color; studies were conducted in the Soviet Union that showed that it was this color that accelerates the reaction of pilots and increases concentration.

  • @zapfanzapfan
    @zapfanzapfan Год назад +8

    18:50 That weight for Mi-26 is total takeoff weight, not cargo (it has lifted a 25 ton block of frozen tundra with a mammoth in it). The weights for V-12 were the cargo weights.
    I have stood in the rotor wash of a Mi-26, it was windy! It had been hired to put up a power line in the early 1990s.

  • @telsat
    @telsat Год назад +7

    This was an incredible feat of engineering for the time of analog instruments and design on paper. I love this video

  • @eottoe2001
    @eottoe2001 Год назад +10

    And they did it with slide-rules and velum paper.

  • @glendenig9962
    @glendenig9962 Год назад +10

    This thing is like a subway tunnel with wings and rotors! Astounding aircraft!

  • @MyLinguine
    @MyLinguine Год назад +5

    Soviet designers : How big of a helicopter would you like?
    Khrushchev: YES

  • @ThreenaddiesRexMegistus
    @ThreenaddiesRexMegistus Год назад +17

    What a wonderful feat of engineering! The Russians can certainly innovate when they need to.

    • @mafan.stenole
      @mafan.stenole Год назад +1

      Hopefully they won't need any innovations anytime sooner.

    • @user-nb1sb2io5k
      @user-nb1sb2io5k Год назад +2

      @@mafan.stenole hate speech

    • @mafan.stenole
      @mafan.stenole Год назад

      @@user-nb1sb2io5k name me one genuine innovation Russia delivered to the world since the fall of the soviet union. Everywhere I see Russians driving western cars, dressing western clothes and eating western food. It's not hate speech comrade, it's reality.

  • @boardnski156
    @boardnski156 Год назад +7

    Great video about Soviet aviation engineering! Where the West would have designed the cargo to break apart and be quickly reassembled, the Soviets just made a helo big enough to handle the cargo.

  • @captainexcabier
    @captainexcabier Год назад +8

    It's a shame she never saw service, but it's nice that they kept the prototypes. Just think if some of the old Norton Flying Wings had been kept as museum pieces.

  • @ABrit-bt6ce
    @ABrit-bt6ce Год назад +5

    Monino is a heck of a place.

  • @cpt_bill366
    @cpt_bill366 Год назад +15

    That thing is a spaceship compared to other helicopters, especially the crew areas. I have never seen so much of the interior before. Thanks for sharing!

  • @TheHarryChase
    @TheHarryChase Год назад +7

    So many complicated systems! Kudos to the designers who kept upgrading the machine, but what a job!

  • @andrewtucker7437
    @andrewtucker7437 Год назад +44

    I would like to thank you for posting this. The Soviet Union made so many unique aircraft.
    The quality of you video is outstanding. It's one of my dreams to visit the aviation museum in Monino.
    Please keep up the good work, it's well appreciated.

  • @lucasokeefe7935
    @lucasokeefe7935 Год назад +14

    I absolutely love the maintenance platform detail on the engine nacelles.
    EDIT: Can also definitely hear the 'D'OH' from the cockpit after the landing gear collapsed during the first flight

  • @gusmanovr
    @gusmanovr Год назад +6

    Saw this great monster! It's fantastic

  • @terrylawrence1807
    @terrylawrence1807 Год назад +23

    I remember reading about this amazing machine in Soviet magazines in the late 60's and often wondered what became of it. So glad to see both prototypes are still in existence. Thanks for producing this wonderful look into Soviet helicopters.

  • @davidwebber8636
    @davidwebber8636 Год назад +23

    Another excellent piece of work. Thanks for posting!

  • @skunkjobb
    @skunkjobb Год назад +35

    Yes finally!!! I have known about and been fascinated by this machine ever since I read about it as a kid in the book "History of inventions" in Swedish back in 1984. So little footage has been available but this is by far the best and most comprehensive documentary about this marvelous machine I've ever seen. Many thanks for making it!

  • @raylawrence1
    @raylawrence1 Год назад +9

    Thank you for a comprehensive and first class commentary on this remarkable machine. A bold project seen to fruition only to be overtaken by history. A proud achievement to be sure. 👍

  • @chrislong3938
    @chrislong3938 Год назад +9

    If there's one thing I'll give the Ruskies, it's their ability to build really cool helicopters!

    • @jakejhons5138
      @jakejhons5138 Год назад +3

      They built great submarines and space crafts too.

    • @olegk11
      @olegk11 Год назад +1

      Building one thing, making it fly for extended period of time is another 😂😂🖕🇷🇺

    • @jakejhons5138
      @jakejhons5138 Год назад

      @@olegk11 🇺🇸 👢 👅

    • @olegk11
      @olegk11 Год назад

      @@jakejhons5138
      🇺🇲🏡🛻🚄✈️ или 🇷🇺🥷🏚️🪵🪓🧎‍♂️🐑🪖💀⚰️

    • @mrobocop1666
      @mrobocop1666 Год назад

      @@olegk11 Mi-26 biggest helicopter and An-124 biggest cargo plane are flying for decades.
      And what planes Ukraine was able to build after independence? All Ukrainian aviation industry gifted by USSR has been rotten and went in hell

  • @asdrubalanibal6853
    @asdrubalanibal6853 Год назад +6

    This could be a highly challenging, awesome RC project.

  • @legPhase
    @legPhase Год назад +5

    I remember Mi-24 flying very low (probably 300m) above my home village in the late 80ies

  • @sski
    @sski Год назад +12

    I've been amazed all my life at Russian design concepts for vehicles. Always challenging convention!
    Спасибо тебе, мой друг!

  • @matthewmoore5698
    @matthewmoore5698 Год назад +2

    They always good at “BIG “

  • @timbaskett6299
    @timbaskett6299 Год назад +4

    The V-12 is such a great looking aircraft. It should have made it into series production.

  • @gusxomer5037
    @gusxomer5037 Год назад +1

    i saw it when i went to monino...it was huge!! first thing you see when you go to the open field...

  • @Gottenhimfella
    @Gottenhimfella Год назад +3

    Hard to see how the transverse layout makes any of the twin rotor problems go away with the sole exception of the length of the fuselage. However, the transverse disposition requires an entirely extra structure just to carry the rotors, and that structural addition is subject to similar load to the lengthened fuselage, hence the aircraft's structural weight almost doubles.

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 Год назад +19

    This helicopter was designed with really one purpose in mind: transport full-assembled ICBM's to launch silos far way from the Trans-Siberian Railroad in the eastern part of the USSR. However, they dropped the idea when the Soviets decided to instead develop mobile launchers for their ICBM's, especially with the RT-2PM _Topol_ missile. That freed up the Mil design bureau to develop the much more useful Mi-26 transport helicopter.

  • @obelic71
    @obelic71 Год назад +8

    Somewhere in the Soviet Union in the mid 1960's.
    Comrade why fly people and some luggage to destination when entire Oblast can fly in one move?

  • @richardhaynes6934
    @richardhaynes6934 Год назад +42

    As always, your aviation videos are the best on RUclips! No one does it better and I love your prose…..always get a chuckle while being expertly informed. Thanks for the “flying building”! Keep up the great work Sky!!👍👍👍

  • @1pasupaty
    @1pasupaty Год назад +3

    Soviet were really at their peak in aviation.verynfew built but they did

  • @MililaniJag
    @MililaniJag Год назад +3

    Layout reminds me of the WWII German (1940) Focke-Achgelis Fa 223 Drache. Cheers!

  • @majikglustik9704
    @majikglustik9704 Год назад +2

    Thank you, Sky, for bringing me these majestic titans.
    Remarkable!

  • @ymg200
    @ymg200 Год назад +3

    Great story, thank you for telling it.

  • @johnkern7075
    @johnkern7075 Год назад +2

    That is some helicopter!

  • @TheGryxter
    @TheGryxter Год назад +6

    What an amazing beast! I would love to be able to get the chance to go inside. Must be a thrill to stand inside such a massive machine like that.

  • @skenzyme81
    @skenzyme81 Год назад +97

    Only helicopter ever made that would have been capable of lifting a fully loaded 40' shipping container (67,200 lbs).

    • @fredhermanspann6914
      @fredhermanspann6914 Год назад

      ]p81

    • @TheHomeMaker1
      @TheHomeMaker1 Год назад +19

      No sorry brother a MI-6 lifted 125,000 + pounds to 2,000 meters so the MI-6 lifted almost not quite but almost X2 40’ foot loaded containers it was done near Moscow by the MI-6 in 1982

    • @thelovertunisia
      @thelovertunisia Год назад +4

      Helix if you pause an instant and think about this, we realise how difficult it is to transport mass by air, even more by vertical takeoff which requires way more power than wing lift. A 100 hp engine in a old semi can haul a 40ft container around the country and on a freight train on a flat track they can get as low as 1hp/ton of mass! I would say in a helicopter it is as high as 1000hp/T or even more!

    • @Gottenhimfella
      @Gottenhimfella Год назад +4

      @@TheHomeMaker1 That's not the case, sorry to say. That's the all-up weight, not the payload.
      On 3 February 1982, flown by Ге́рман Вита́льевич Алфёров (Herman Vitalievich Alferov) and L.A. Indeev, the Mi-26 with an *all-up weight* of 56,768.8 kilograms (125,153.8 pounds) flew to a height of 2,000 meters (6,562 feet).¹ Later, they flew to a height of 4,100 meters (13,451 feet) with a payload of 25,000 kilograms (55,115.6 pounds).²
      The helicopter has an empty weight of 28,200 kilograms (62,170 pounds)

    • @GooglePlusPages
      @GooglePlusPages Год назад +2

      Geez... Makes a Skycrane look like an absolute wimp in comparison. Although I do like the Sikorsky's design.

  • @UncleManuel
    @UncleManuel 9 месяцев назад +1

    "Customers who constantly change their mind."
    That was a very polite description of the Soviet leadership in particular and pretty much every military contract in general... 😁😁😜😜🤘🤘

  • @BeKindToBirds
    @BeKindToBirds Год назад +2

    The livery is so beautiful.

  • @denvan3143
    @denvan3143 Год назад +3

    Years ago there was a commercial for an outfitter called itself “Hotelicopter”; supposedly a flying hotel. The CGI was based on the Mil V 12.

  • @SiVlog1989
    @SiVlog1989 Год назад +33

    One of the first successful helicopters built also had its rotors fitted transversely, the German built Focke Achgelis FA-223, Dragon. One of these helicopters made history post WW2 in being the first helicopter to cross the English Channel, while being taken from Germany to the Royal Aircraft Establishment in England to study

  • @lancelotkillz
    @lancelotkillz Год назад +3

    Love the narration and slight hint of an accent PERFECT

  • @vgovger4373
    @vgovger4373 Год назад +1

    That's one thing about old USSR, they were very creative with planes and ships and even their shuttle craft.

  • @thunderamu9543
    @thunderamu9543 Год назад +2

    Sky, Thanks again for another dive into an airframe we are not often exposed to in the West.

  • @josephdestaubin7426
    @josephdestaubin7426 Год назад +4

    My first question when looking at that beast is what are the metallurgical problems associated with the router?

  • @kaushertop
    @kaushertop 9 месяцев назад +1

    Must admit the designers of ussr were crazy as well as daring

  • @mikehook4830
    @mikehook4830 Год назад +24

    An incredible feat of engineering and creativity that I never knew about previously. The line of of rotary wing aircraft that were produced by the Soviets is indeed impressive. Personally, I appreciate the aesthetic of the V-12 as well...borderline steampunk. Fascinating entry Sky, thanks for bringing it to us.

    • @urbanweekendwarrior7238
      @urbanweekendwarrior7238 10 месяцев назад +1

      feat of engineering? its a twin rotor heli on steroids. it's a feat of impracticality

    • @-danR
      @-danR 10 месяцев назад +1

      Honestly it is the _stupidest_ looking object I have ever seen.

    • @kartoffelfresser2347
      @kartoffelfresser2347 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@urbanweekendwarrior7238Blöder gehts wohl nicht!🤮

    • @kartoffelfresser2347
      @kartoffelfresser2347 5 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@-danRdann schau mal in den Spiegel, deine Eltern waren nicht besser !😅

  • @johnyoung3870
    @johnyoung3870 Год назад +2

    I am more fascinated with the people that flew the prototypes without any parachutes.

  • @andreasbach1975
    @andreasbach1975 Год назад +4

    Absolutely fantastic!Thx for this video👍

  • @indridcold8433
    @indridcold8433 Год назад +5

    Conclusion: bigger is better! Size does matter! If you are putting around in a mosquito ultralite, do not expect to satisfy when you show that tiny collective handle. If you want to deliver a really huge load, you need an enormous, throbbing, massive Soviet helicopter. It will deliver the huge loads that will never fail to satisfy.

  • @sethmerrell8888
    @sethmerrell8888 5 месяцев назад

    I remember being 7 years old and the mil-12 was my favorite thing ever.

  • @robert506007
    @robert506007 Год назад +2

    I have have been to the Central Air Museum and that V-12 is incredible.

  • @rossplotkin3506
    @rossplotkin3506 Год назад +6

    Fascinating machine.

  • @drcovell
    @drcovell Год назад +2

    Well done!

  • @JohnDoe-cf8jz
    @JohnDoe-cf8jz Год назад +1

    Good story, thank you.

  • @Mutlap
    @Mutlap Год назад +4

    flew in the CH53 during the Vietnam conflict on MCAS Futenma Airbase 73-75 I extended for a second year, quite an impressive machine!

    • @3laci
      @3laci Год назад +1

      The CH53 is a primitive, miniature, toy, compared to a Mi-6

  • @ronaryel6445
    @ronaryel6445 Год назад +4

    The German Focke-Achgelis Model 61 had a transverse arrangement and served very well in small numbers. Hundreds were planned for production but the Allies repeatedly bombed the factory. It first flew in 1936. The Bell tiltroter first flew in 1955.

  • @AtheistOrphan
    @AtheistOrphan Год назад +12

    Great video I’ve always been fascinated by this behemoth and it was great to see the interior.

  • @gryfandjane
    @gryfandjane Год назад +10

    Outstanding video! I first learned of the V-12 through photos taken at Monino, then did some searches and read about the aircraft. Thanks for the interior views especially. It appears to be very well-preserved. Thanks!

  • @SoloSailing77
    @SoloSailing77 Год назад +2

    Considering the chances of going to see that in person are gone completely, I sure did appreciate the video!

    • @Tallorian
      @Tallorian Год назад

      What do you mean, "gone completely"? Whoever wants can get the visa and travel here through other countries. Unless you're personally blacklisted of course.

  • @AviationNut
    @AviationNut Год назад +5

    I can't even imagine being the test pilot of this beast. I would be $h!t!ng bricks taking it up for the first time.

  • @SolarMoth
    @SolarMoth Год назад +2

    That's such a marvel!

  • @ddegn
    @ddegn Год назад +8

    Wow! I had never heard of this aircraft. Thank you for telling us about it. Thank you for the awesome video.

  • @BossBossBoss1020
    @BossBossBoss1020 Год назад +5

    amazing

  • @alun7006
    @alun7006 Год назад +13

    Fascinating stuff, and a wonderful machine from a time when design teams took risks. I have a request - would you be willing to cover the Yak-28 family? They're one of my favourite Soviet aircraft, yet information on them is quite hard to come by. A really interesting multi-purpose design.

  • @physetermacrocephalus2209
    @physetermacrocephalus2209 Год назад +1

    I like that such a cool machine is so well preserved that kids can go inside and explore. They looked soo excited!

  • @Zog26
    @Zog26 Год назад +3

    This bad boy was in my Top Trumps helicopters pack when I was a schoolboy in the late 70s!!

  • @germansnowman
    @germansnowman Год назад +5

    May I make a correction: Helicopters don’t have propellers but rotors. Also, the footage of the Chinook disintegrating is not from the rotors hitting each other but from a vibration test, IIRC.

  • @XLA-zg1nn
    @XLA-zg1nn Год назад +3

    WOW. I didn't know they kept it!

  • @leokimvideo
    @leokimvideo 8 месяцев назад +13

    The Soviets are fairly smart at knowing when to dump an idea, especially if it's a monster to fly and there's other more conventional ways of achieving success

    • @everkief8650
      @everkief8650 8 месяцев назад +2

      I disagree! I worked with 100s of Russians during my 30 year career and the VAST majority of them are lazy, obstinate and always the last ones to admit a mistake or failure, even when it endangers other peoples lives. Their lack of attention to detail and safety protocols is literally criminal in our work environment and they were entirely oblivious and confused when called on their countless failings! Lazy and Arrogant bastards for the most part!

  • @MattTee1975
    @MattTee1975 Год назад +3

    I love the ridiculous/creative things the Soviets came up with. They were analogous to like, real-life G.I. Joe toys.

  • @scottprendergast5262
    @scottprendergast5262 9 месяцев назад +1

    16:40
    RALPH KRAMDEN WAS THE TEST PILOT!
    even has his bus driver uniform on!!
    and awaaay we gooo!

  • @ElectricUAM
    @ElectricUAM Год назад +3

    Wow, Sky, another great video on a VTOL monster many forgot by now. I'm part of the VFS and have seen some of its pictures, but a video does it more justice. I've always wondered about the downwash effect on landing and also on the wings, but I guess the flaps minimize the latter. Excellent find again!

  • @rallyworld3417
    @rallyworld3417 Год назад +2

    Wow this is not even a concept this is actual machine in real life

  • @cliffwoodbury5319
    @cliffwoodbury5319 Год назад +4

    the latest variations would have far more powerful and efficient engines and with lighter construction materials I wonder how much frame support the wings would need. 2 See this even in video would be AMAZING!!! Some of the bodies to the other helicopters have changed over the decades with their improvements and I bet this helicopter would be no different; so it would look sleeker 2.

  • @jamessones4044
    @jamessones4044 9 месяцев назад +1

    I just think it’s amazing how far we’ve come in such short time with flight.
    As we step into a new era where opening up spacecraft as a possibility of being real is surely interesting at the very least

  • @ADPeguero
    @ADPeguero Год назад +6

    Thank you for this Sky. Your content is always so relevant and full of information.

  • @RichieRouge206
    @RichieRouge206 Год назад +5

    Superb video as always and what an amazing machine

  • @michaelogden5958
    @michaelogden5958 Год назад +4

    Quite a machine. Great video!

  • @Ste2023
    @Ste2023 Год назад +1

    Amazing engineering by the Soviets

  • @krashd
    @krashd Год назад +1

    That is one big steaming pile of helicopter alright. I want one!