Short answer: A contract's object always involves a specific thing. Long answer: In unilateral obligations to give a generic thing, there can be no contract. However, there can be an obligation governed by Art. 1246. Therefore, if for example, we have an obligations which states: "X obliged himself to give a dog to Y." This is a generic real obligation but there is no contract. So what's the source of this obligation? It will be the Law - specifically Civil Code under Book IV Obligations and Contracts governed by Art. 1246.
Just a clarification for 36:13 po, regarding to the Deaf-mutes who do not know how to write. Based po sa book ni Hector De Leon the following requisites should be applied bago masabing walang consent yung individual: 1. Deaf 2. Mute 3. Illiterate (don't know how to read & write) it is considered a valid contract if the deaf-mute knows how to read but did not know how to write, since possibly there's a physical reasons for a person do not know ho to write. based rin po sa professor ko, basta may isa pong di naattain sa criteria ng deaf-mute and illiterate, the contract can be valid.
Pano po kapag meron silang pinirmahang kasunduan na pinabayaran ang kabuuan ng lupa sa kanyang manugang dahil ito ay may hanapbuhay subalit nakalagay sa kanilang kasunduan na kalahati lamang ang mapupunta duon sa nagbayad ng full payment,sapagkay ang kalahati ng lupa at bahay ay duon pa rin mapupunta sa mga anak ng matanda na nakipagkasundo na pinirmahan ng kanyang manugang na nagbayad, subalit ng lumabas ang titulo ay nakapangalan ito duon sa mismong nagbayad ,ngayon ibig niyang paalisin ang mga nakatira sa kalahati ng kanilang lupat bahay may karapatan pa rin po bang hindi umalis ang mga nakatira duon
Hi, Sir! Good Day po! i-clarify ko lang po 'yung 28:48 kasi medyo nag-contradict po ata sa sinabi sa book ni Sir De Leon? EXAMPLES: X offers to construct the house of Y for a very reasonable price of P500,000.00 giving the latter 10 days within which to make up his mind. Under Article 1324, X may withdraw the offer even before the lapse of 10-days unless Y has already accepted the offer. After acceptance, withdrawal is not possible as there is no more offer to withdraw. Even before acceptance, X may not withdraw the offer if the option is covered by a consideration as when Y paid or promised to pay a sum of money to X for giving him the 10-day period. There is here an option contract. After the 10-day period, in the absence of acceptance, the offer becomes ineffective. Thank you po!
Hello po! Yung example sa book ni sir De Leon is an option contract so X may not withdraw within the 10-day period, kasi may consideration. Sa example po sa 28:48, walang consideration. If there is no consideration, the offerer may revoke his offer anytime before acceptance is conveyed. (Art. 1324)
Question sir. If may option contract yung unilateral promise, tapos binenta ng seller yung object sa third person in good faith. May habol po ba yung buyer kay third person?
Hello, basically yes. Pero pag ginagamit natin kasi ang word na requisite, kumbaga required sya.. meaning it may refer to the essential elements but not to other elements that are not essential.
Thankyou po! Laking tulong ng vid nato naipasa ko ang oral final exam dahil sa vid nato. Credits hehe
Tysm po sir! Ang hirap po intindihin pero pinapadali niyo po.
Thank you, sobrang thank you po rito, magagawa ko na po report ko.
You're welcome :) Feel free to ask any question if you find it confusing
@@Akawnting Ask ko lang po yung Article 1349. Salamat po.
Short answer: A contract's object always involves a specific thing.
Long answer: In unilateral obligations to give a generic thing, there can be no contract. However, there can be an obligation governed by Art. 1246.
Therefore, if for example, we have an obligations which states:
"X obliged himself to give a dog to Y."
This is a generic real obligation but there is no contract. So what's the source of this obligation? It will be the Law - specifically Civil Code under Book IV Obligations and Contracts governed by Art. 1246.
Just a clarification for 36:13 po, regarding to the Deaf-mutes who do not know how to write. Based po sa book ni Hector De Leon the following requisites should be applied bago masabing walang consent yung individual:
1. Deaf
2. Mute
3. Illiterate (don't know how to read & write)
it is considered a valid contract if the deaf-mute knows how to read but did not know how to write, since possibly there's a physical reasons for a person do not know ho to write.
based rin po sa professor ko, basta may isa pong di naattain sa criteria ng deaf-mute and illiterate, the contract can be valid.
Nakakatawa ka mag discuss kuya XD
Pero in a sense na nakakaenjoy
Salamat po
Hello sir, bakit po walang practice set or quiz yung contracts?
Big help! Thank you po sana magkaroon din po ng discussion about partnership law 🙏😊
Sobrang helpful po nito sir, thank you so much po. Itatanong ko lang po if may separate vid kayo na tinackle yung vices of consent? Thank you po.
SALAMAT!!
thankyouuuuuu po
Thank you po!!!
Thank You so much :)
3:55 OFFER
wala po kayong vid about void contracts?
Pano po kapag meron silang pinirmahang kasunduan na pinabayaran ang kabuuan ng lupa sa kanyang manugang dahil ito ay may hanapbuhay subalit nakalagay sa kanilang kasunduan na kalahati lamang ang mapupunta duon sa nagbayad ng full payment,sapagkay ang kalahati ng lupa at bahay ay duon pa rin mapupunta sa mga anak ng matanda na nakipagkasundo na pinirmahan ng kanyang manugang na nagbayad, subalit ng lumabas ang titulo ay nakapangalan ito duon sa mismong nagbayad ,ngayon ibig niyang paalisin ang mga nakatira sa kalahati ng kanilang lupat bahay may karapatan pa rin po bang hindi umalis ang mga nakatira duon
Hi, Sir! Good Day po!
i-clarify ko lang po 'yung 28:48 kasi medyo nag-contradict po ata sa sinabi sa book ni Sir De Leon?
EXAMPLES:
X offers to construct the house of Y for a very reasonable price of
P500,000.00 giving the latter 10 days within which to make up his mind.
Under Article 1324, X may withdraw the offer even before the lapse
of 10-days unless Y has already accepted the offer. After acceptance,
withdrawal is not possible as there is no more offer to withdraw.
Even before acceptance, X may not withdraw the offer if the option
is covered by a consideration as when Y paid or promised to pay a sum
of money to X for giving him the 10-day period. There is here an option
contract. After the 10-day period, in the absence of acceptance, the offer
becomes ineffective.
Thank you po!
Hello po! Yung example sa book ni sir De Leon is an option contract so X may not withdraw within the 10-day period, kasi may consideration.
Sa example po sa 28:48, walang consideration. If there is no consideration, the offerer may revoke his offer anytime before acceptance is conveyed. (Art. 1324)
haha! ang mura ng kilo ng saging:)
sana true
Question sir. If may option contract yung unilateral promise, tapos binenta ng seller yung object sa third person in good faith. May habol po ba yung buyer kay third person?
Elements and Requisites po ay same lang?
Hello, basically yes. Pero pag ginagamit natin kasi ang word na requisite, kumbaga required sya.. meaning it may refer to the essential elements but not to other elements that are not essential.
Sir if may mga other questions po pwede magpm?
yes, you may send us an email here: akawnting.com@gmail.com
Sir pero po ang essential requisites talaga ay consent, object at Cause?
@@batman2624oo. kasi kung wala ni isa dyan hindi considered contract ung...contract
Wala pong part 2?
Dapat bawat discuss mo nilalagyan mo kung anong article na binabanggit mo
Fly high 🤣🤣🤣🤣