So when you misgender someone and it makes them feel bad its 'violence' but when a woman feels scared to go in a space thats meant to be safe for her, its no big deal if theres no real violence? See how the principles change just like that?
No real violence *yet* . If any does happen, well then, the argument will be "that was actually a cis hetero person pretending to be trans"! No, it won't matter how much proof you provide that they're wrong about anything. You either agree or shut up from what I hear.
It's not that the principles changed; because Jaffe also believes women in entertainment need to be desexualized because the male gaze 'hurts' women. It's that Melonie is not a true "woman" in Jaffe's eyes because she's an outspoken Christian, so to Jaffe she looses the 'woman card' and becomes an other, whose feelings and opinions can be discarded prema-fasci along with the concerns everyone else in the 'basket of deplorables'. And who are they? Conveniently they are everyone Jaffe politically disagrees with. A few more years down our current cultural road Jaffe will happily shove Melonie screaming into a gas chamber.
The thing about him asking for proof is that he wouldn't accept anything as proof unless it supports his argument. He will always exclude those who did something that goes against the narrative as "not really trans" or whatever. So there could never be proof that would satisfy him. A trans person does something inappropriate in a women's restroom? Well, they weren't "really trans" if they did that. "They were just a cis guy pretending to be trans to get in there! It doesn't count! No trans people have ever done that!" Same goes for when one changes their minds and regrets getting all the hormone shots, surgeries, etc. They weren't "really trans! They were just confused and thought they were! So therefore no trans people end up regretting it." Etc, etc, etc... Nothing that goes against the doctrine is acceptable. If it supports the doctrine though? Oh, then it's a real fact. Edit: it's literally Schrodinger's Trans...
that's called the "no true Scotsman" fallacy as in "no trans woman would ever assault a woman in the women's bathroom." multi reports of women being assaulted by trans women in the women's bathroom later: "well, no REAL trans woman would ever assault a woman in the women's bathroom."
Right now is that there is nothing preventing a predator from claiming they are trans, and entering women's spaces because they want to be predators. They might not even want to rape or attack, they might just want to creep on women, or they might simply love the power over women this gives them. And if women are worried about this, they need to 'get over it' or they are transphobes, or bigots, or whatever you want to call them. It's sickening.
The left loves to paint this as some kind of incredibly unlikely scenario, but they can't do anything to dispute it because THEY set the rule that you are not allowed to question someone's professed gender identity for any reason. So an obvious chomo who identified as a man five minutes ago can, by the left's own rules, say "Oh, I feel female now!" as he follows your pubescent niece into the public restroom, and any objections will be tWanZfObiK. It's insane, and the people who helped to establish this disgusting standard need to be held to account. This is why I'm pro- socially ostracizing anyone who openly holds socialist/Marxist sympathies: Do everything you can to get them fired from institutions of power and education, refuse to do business with them, and basically make them second-class citizens until they agree to abandon their ideologically driven beliefs, else leave the country for a socialist paradise that is more to their liking (Cuba, Venezuela, China, NK etc.). Tolerance of Marxist thought should no longer be tolerated in this country, because look where the fuck it's gotten us. The pendulum MUST swing, and we gotta make sure it swings so fast and hard that they don't even see it coming.
Except that predators have predated on women long before this, and in a hypothetical scenario where we could verify if someone was trans they would just find a new way to be a creep
@@seivernoname-tz9uh predators will always exist. We, as a society, accept this. What we do *not* do is give predators a free pass to do predator things in society. In other words, our primary way of preventing predators is to recognize predator behavior. This is predator behavior that is not universally recognized as such... yet. It will be.
Uh huh, Coming From the same guy who Calls anyone he doesnt like the Race Card if they hate a Video Game with a POC Lead and Bad Dialogue. Sure, David.
This is why you don't give these people the time of day. You'll never get a straight answer out of them and no one is ever convinced by these pointless debates because they drag on so long no one can ever follow them. It's a waist of time.
This David Jaffe is a real winner. Remember when they claimed gender (man, woman) and sex (male, female) were separate, but immediately blurred the lines with their language? Just more of the same from a rabid ideologue.
I said this multiple times : the emperors new clothes, we live in that world right now. Jaffe and his ilk in LA suffers from herd mentality and is under the spell of shame tactics, so they will applaude the mad king, running around in the street naked, while praising his clothes.
Jaffe: I want to change the world to fit my ideology. If you don't want it to change you need to give me evidence. Also Jaffe: What do you mean you want evidence why my ideas are right. What are you a bigot?
"If you are passing laws to limit someone's freedom, you better have a reason other than 'it makes me uncomfortable'." Oh, you mean like how California tried to pass a law to criminalize "misgendering", and how Canada currently has such a law in place? Nothing happens to a person for being misgendered, aside from them having a meltdown that someone doesn't agree with using them. Heck, even if it's purely by accident, some people are still "uncomfortable" by it.
@@RandomPerson-nd2ey Hey i had the same idea, but my rule will surely work because i totally know exactly what everyone needs to do! I also happen to be Austrian (failed Media-Design Student), it will be great!
@@RandomPerson-nd2ey Very strange to see anyone simp for a system that's frankly just as bad as dictatorship (and if you don't think it is, try putting yourself in the shoes of the one sheep who's desperately trying to out-vote two wolves on what's for dinner). Democracy is such a broken system that even the Greeks, who invented it, couldn't help but poke gaping holes in it. See: Aristotle. Bottom line, democratic principles NEED to be chained if you don't want them to devolve into tyranny of the majority. A constitution is necessary. Separated branches of government are necessary. An electoral college system is necessary. Filibusters are necessary. Constitutional republicanism therefore blows your democracy out of the water every day of the week. The Greeks got it wrong, the Romans got it right. Cope.
This idea that the world will be chaotic without laws is so full of crap as if hunter gatherers didn't survive without a single law in existence and we cannot do the same.
Jaffe: I don't have a dog in this fight Also Jaffe: My daughter is trans and goes by they/them Jaffe: No they (she) were not influenced they(she) just realised on their(her) own Also Jaffe: Their (Her) friends are all transmen like them (her)
@@SailorGreen I never understood why people can't just stay true to themselves. Yeah, time has a way of changing people, but this much? I don't buy it.
As someone who had family (thank god they died before this) would be in these bathrooms and RUclips doesn’t allow what they would be doing. This guy honestly doesn’t know or care about anything but himself and has no clue what he is trying to push or it’s consequences
“Gay men have been assaulted by straight men forever” umm dude, men fight other men all the time being gay doesn’t make you an exclusive target. I’ve been attacked more times than I can count by other men, I’m straight…but if I was gay it’d be easy to believe it’s was due to that…some men attack those they perceive to be weaker men…your sexuality is a target but so is being skinny, looking goofy, ginger hair, wearing glasses etc etc etc….it’s beyond naïve to think it’s exclusively because your gay. I could get attacked in a toilet based on a whole host of perceived weaknesses. That’s nature…that’s the food chain. Man I’ve seen women attack men and beat the crap out of them…the idea you’ll be safe in a women’s toilet is a blinkered world view. It’s simple…if you have a penis you’re in the men’s room, no matter anything else.
That guy talks a lot but says nothing. He can't even answer the basic question of why is the 1 trans person's feelings more important than the 10 women that also use the bathroom? Oh because "she" feels weird and uncomfortable if she doesn't, what do you think the actual women feel like?
Well there is data, but not academic data which is what I think Jaffe is looking for. Academia is not interested in any real data on trans people that doesn't support them in a positive way. All we have are news articles that people have to look up that may have been deleted. Even so I don't think he'll budge since he seems to just like being right.
They probably have. This isn't anything he hasn't heard or lied about or weaseled his way around before. He came into this conversation solely to bash side scrollers. It's what leftists Do. It's what they've always done. Not a ounce of humility or understanding anywhere in him.
You really don't need hard data to legitimate a right to privacy and that is ultimately what this guy is trying to speak against. Bathrooms are separated based on a guilty until proven innocent framework in the first place and it is done for the very reasons explained, at least in part. He argues that trans women aren't men but doesn't seem to speak that we should just let men into the bathrooms. Just completely desegregate them. Well, why not? Men aren't dangerous a-holes, right? Does he have data of men assaulting women in their bathrooms in droves? See, I neither need data nor do I care to have a pretty good sense that that is what would happen if that were done with our culture operating the way it does. I've heard of unisex bathrooms in other countries but other countries are nurtured under different cultural expectations and those don't just change nor should necessarily be made to just because they arguably could. See, our bathroom system works for the reasons it does. There's never been a reason to change it until this new kind of thing came along and why should it be made to? Because they have a personal comfort issue whilst also placing the vast majority at risk? And what's funny is that this guy's argument is the same as hers. That we need to accommodate the feelings of the trans. The difference is there's no extra risk to the trans people being placed on them. You are, however, placing special risk on the women and it's a sense of risk that is well justified. That's why his argument doesn't work. It's an emotional appeal argument that carries no confirmably extra risk for them to use a normal bathroom and there are other alternatives such as making gender neutral bathrooms for them. But to let them into normal bathrooms under their chosen gender presumes they're the only ones that will use them. See, he focuses his argument on innocent until proven guilty trans women. Okay... But how do we keep the ones that'd take advantage of that out? See, we can't. All risk on the women but not the trans who biologically have a better chance to fight back if they are attacked comparitively. The math just doesn't work in this guy's favor
No, but listen to what he's saying "Get over it". If you're a transwoman, and you feel uncomfortable in the men's bathroom, get over it. In fact, if you're feeling uncomfortable in a "male body" get over it.
It's simple. All these spaces are "sex-based" spaces. Not "gender identity" spaces. The sophists and the ideologues took advantage of the fact that most people use "sex" and "gender" synonymously, claimed every sex-based space was a "gender"-based space, and then injected their new definition of "gender" as a social construct of whatever anyone decides it means and/or a self-defined thing. And then claimed that excluding anyone from a newly invented category of "gender identity" was bigoted, unfair, and "rights-denying" discrimination. Bathrooms, locker-rooms, sports, prisons, female safe-houses, women-only spas/saunas, and other such spaces are SEX-based. Defined wholly on your biological sex. And for the people with Sexual Disorders like intersex, Swyer's Syndrome, etc. are not an issue with these spaces, nor have they been. These exceptions still produce phenotypical male or female people, who have no issue identifying and living as one sex or the other.
Men should have told women to get over it when they wanted to enter gentlemen’s clubs and other male only spaces. Now that they have argued men aren’t allowed to have men only spaces, they cannot argue that women should.
3:57 "Why" Well frankly a lot of people out there know how absurd their arguments are and are too self-aware to go and spew them out in an honest discussion. It's much better to just scream at people through a megaphone to bully them into compliance.
regardless of what anyone thinks about anyone's opinion, these are the kinds of discussions we need to be having if we are actually going to get anywhere
Women have been attacked by "trans women" in restrooms. All he has to do is watch/read the news. Hasn't this guy heard about male prisoners claiming to be trans just to get into the women's prison?
I feel it should be publicly presented when a comment section has be wiped of all comments in favor of one side of the argument. 60k views and only 200 likes, seems suspicious that there's no comments stating why they did not like the video.
"Where's the numbers?" Oh, okay, David... there have been several 'trans' women who went into female spaces, and assaulted the actual women in them. Off the top of my head, I can think of woman's prisons, there was that spa that a mom and her daughter got sued for keeping away from the trans woman who intruded... and, there's a case in Canada where a multiple time offender went to aestheticians, and demanded they wax 'her' gooch, and 'she' has been sued over it basically every time, because of how they have to kick 'her' out.
This guy is frequently on the same podcasts with Collin Moriarty. His takes are all over the place. Usually frustrating. He's as slippery as an eel cus I can't get a hold of him.
He thinks that the gaming industry is going in the right direction with gamepass. He thinks that we should embrace AI writers in our entertainment. His idea of "liberalism" has no limit - that anything that breaks the tradition will be automatically good for society. ALWAYS.
"If a man has two boobs on their back, and it makes them uncomfortable..." So, dismorphia? Or, you know, that thing that got removed from the 'qualifiers' for being trans?
If men are a risk, do they stop being a risk when they decide to identify as a woman? Does that somehow make them safer than they were before? What is Jaffee talking about? Jaffe looking for "data" for this is like if straight men wanted "data" to show they shouldn't also be allowed to be in women's bathrooms.
Her: "Men in a bathroom leaves women feel unsafe and uncomfortable" Him: "Your real problem is that evil people and mentally ill exist. The real solution is to rid the world of all evil actions"
I think public restrooms are already some of the most unsafe places and we're arguing the wrong things with this trans stuff the only thing I see there is it's not gonna make anything better maybe we should pass laws to make the places safer period retool the stalls and whatnot have an open washroom separate from the toilets and a 1 person private washroom for use as needed for when washing hands isn't gonna cut or I'm sure there's a million better ways than what we do now
I feel like the way the first 10 seconds is presented is a little disingenuous. Maybe I'm wrong, but I felt like he was being sarcastic and that was lost in the intro. Not talking shit, I'm a fan. Just throwing it out there.
It’s about games and politics. It’s also about politics because that’s the world we live in now. What I like about Sidescrollers though is that they aren’t some woke boring channel running defense for the corrupt and morally bankrupt liberal zombie machine.
I get the feeling i'm supposed to disagree with Jaffe considering this video's target audience but he does a really good job making his points and the girl absolutely failed to refute them.
It's hard to watch this after watchingbthe whole thing unedited. I put my money into side scrollers from the very beginning. I like criag. I believed he was in it for a good time, I still do but his constant attack on the trans community has made me pull funding. I can't sit here and think that his agenda isn't supportive of people like me and the people I know and love. I'm not for religious strong points when it comes to politics either, I actually hate when people try to run politics with religion. We came to America to fight the churches banks and taxes. So criag I love ya man but I can't support the scrolls if you can't support or at least try to understand my people. 😢 I'm taking Jaffe's side on this he was a fantastic guest and good work getting him on the show I thought he held his own against all three of you. I'll be most liking checking out his channel.
Wiley, appreciate your feedback. Can you point to a specific instance of the "constant attack on the trans community"? Do you see this video as an "attack?" I (Craig) have said all along, I don't care how you live as long as you don't tell me how to live mine. You feel like you're a girl or a boy, whatever. My hard line in the sand is when it involves kids.
@SideScrollersPodcast Craig I appreciate your opinions and respect your stance, I to have two kids, and they mean the world to me. Nothing is more important than protecting them. That being said I can't help but feel offended when you talk about Trans people and the community, you've referred to it as a clown world I laughed it off and continued to support and try to understand your side of the issue. I'm a very understanding individual, so I view the world from all perspectives before I form an opinion or a stance. I also try to learn as much as possible about a subject before dismissing it. Now it's very good to have an opinion it's even better to have a civil conversation with peers that disagree with you , When I say attack on the Trans community it's mostly because you don't respect the pronoun, and that the subject of the Trans community comes up more on your channel then any other gaming platform and its showered in negative light. I will say some of the subjects you've brought up I'll agree with you on. The women from limited run that was falsely fired. Yeah that was Bs. And I'm on your side there. But the whole disrespecting the pronouns thing not acknowledged them ignoring or flat out refusing to use them is disrespectful and bullish. You dont have to agree, but you can disagree respectfully. You say Trans is a new thing and it's due to social media but then how do you explain the Edo period in Japan , The Trans riots at the Tenderlion upheaval in 1966. (Pre dates the stonewall riots.) Celebration itakes place in ptown every year for that riot. How do you explain Ann Bonnie or Mary Reed famous Trans pirates dated back in the 1700. Trans people deserve validation. I am tired of the women's bathroom being the be all end all debate plug to discredit them. Fine take the bathroom 🚻 if that makes you feel better, but don't act like Trans people deserve to be called out bullied and disrespected. As far as giving kids proper therapy to understand if there transgender, or to understand why they think they might be transgender I'm all for it therapy shouldn't be dismissed or vilified everyone needs a Lil therapy. Inwishbi got more as a young adult. As for hormones and surgery we are all adults here sure let's talk about it. That's a subject worth discussing and coming up with the best solution to benefit the youths of tomorrow and the future of today. It's a very slippery subject and I don't mind having real discussion about it at all.
One more thing criag ever thought of having a Natalie Wynn of contra points on side scrollers she's a former conservative that is not only level headed but is very grounded in Philosophy, economics, politics and religion. If your going to have any one on this channel to discuss the issues you bring forward, it would be her.
There have been men who claimed to be trans for the lols. What makes this wojack think some won't use it to creep on women in the one place they can feel absolutely safe? I don't believe this guy made GOW, but that's beside the point.
Oh they do, you’re just trying to defend an indefensible position. Jaffe constantly talks “show data, show data,” but never provides it himself. He always submits to the fallacy of “well I’m not trans so I can’t say.” He has no arguments, he has feelings, and yet Melanie’s feelings, she just needs to “get over them.”
So when you misgender someone and it makes them feel bad its 'violence' but when a woman feels scared to go in a space thats meant to be safe for her, its no big deal if theres no real violence?
See how the principles change just like that?
No real violence *yet* . If any does happen, well then, the argument will be "that was actually a cis hetero person pretending to be trans"! No, it won't matter how much proof you provide that they're wrong about anything. You either agree or shut up from what I hear.
This
It's not that the principles changed; because Jaffe also believes women in entertainment need to be desexualized because the male gaze 'hurts' women.
It's that Melonie is not a true "woman" in Jaffe's eyes because she's an outspoken Christian, so to Jaffe she looses the 'woman card' and becomes an other, whose feelings and opinions can be discarded prema-fasci along with the concerns everyone else in the 'basket of deplorables'. And who are they? Conveniently they are everyone Jaffe politically disagrees with.
A few more years down our current cultural road Jaffe will happily shove Melonie screaming into a gas chamber.
200% true. They’re complete hypocrites.
@@ThunderClapClide exactly, it drives me nuts.
Its difficult to take what Jaffe says seriously when he says every white person is racist because they're white and already have an advantage in life.
Somehow I knew he was j*wish before I pulled up his wikipedia article.
What happened to this dude?
He's so different from the Twisted Metal/God of War days.
@@bosshog8844
Every.
Single.
Time.
@lucascoval828 Living in California long term rots the brain.
It’s like he’s forgotten that every white person isn’t born into a wealthy family.
I like how the future of safety for children depends entirely on this guy's whims.
wth are you talking about lol
Not too late to move to Asia dude. Passport bro all the way.
The thing about him asking for proof is that he wouldn't accept anything as proof unless it supports his argument. He will always exclude those who did something that goes against the narrative as "not really trans" or whatever. So there could never be proof that would satisfy him.
A trans person does something inappropriate in a women's restroom? Well, they weren't "really trans" if they did that. "They were just a cis guy pretending to be trans to get in there! It doesn't count! No trans people have ever done that!"
Same goes for when one changes their minds and regrets getting all the hormone shots, surgeries, etc. They weren't "really trans! They were just confused and thought they were! So therefore no trans people end up regretting it."
Etc, etc, etc... Nothing that goes against the doctrine is acceptable. If it supports the doctrine though? Oh, then it's a real fact.
Edit: it's literally Schrodinger's Trans...
Same thing with Socialists.
that's called the "no true Scotsman" fallacy
as in "no trans woman would ever assault a woman in the women's bathroom."
multi reports of women being assaulted by trans women in the women's bathroom later:
"well, no REAL trans woman would ever assault a woman in the women's bathroom."
He says her argument doesn’t count because she doesn’t have the stats, but his argument does count even though he doesn’t have that stats.
Right now is that there is nothing preventing a predator from claiming they are trans, and entering women's spaces because they want to be predators. They might not even want to rape or attack, they might just want to creep on women, or they might simply love the power over women this gives them.
And if women are worried about this, they need to 'get over it' or they are transphobes, or bigots, or whatever you want to call them.
It's sickening.
The left loves to paint this as some kind of incredibly unlikely scenario, but they can't do anything to dispute it because THEY set the rule that you are not allowed to question someone's professed gender identity for any reason. So an obvious chomo who identified as a man five minutes ago can, by the left's own rules, say "Oh, I feel female now!" as he follows your pubescent niece into the public restroom, and any objections will be tWanZfObiK. It's insane, and the people who helped to establish this disgusting standard need to be held to account.
This is why I'm pro- socially ostracizing anyone who openly holds socialist/Marxist sympathies: Do everything you can to get them fired from institutions of power and education, refuse to do business with them, and basically make them second-class citizens until they agree to abandon their ideologically driven beliefs, else leave the country for a socialist paradise that is more to their liking (Cuba, Venezuela, China, NK etc.). Tolerance of Marxist thought should no longer be tolerated in this country, because look where the fuck it's gotten us. The pendulum MUST swing, and we gotta make sure it swings so fast and hard that they don't even see it coming.
Precisely this. This is what being “progressive” gets you.
Heterophobes will say the stupidest shit.
Except that predators have predated on women long before this, and in a hypothetical scenario where we could verify if someone was trans they would just find a new way to be a creep
@@seivernoname-tz9uh predators will always exist. We, as a society, accept this.
What we do *not* do is give predators a free pass to do predator things in society.
In other words, our primary way of preventing predators is to recognize predator behavior. This is predator behavior that is not universally recognized as such... yet. It will be.
Uh huh, Coming From the same guy who Calls anyone he doesnt like the Race Card if they hate a Video Game with a POC Lead and Bad Dialogue. Sure, David.
colored lead stop this POC shit don't use their words/
This is why you don't give these people the time of day.
You'll never get a straight answer out of them and no one is ever convinced by these pointless debates because they drag on so long no one can ever follow them.
It's a waist of time.
@@fictiontheorizer4253
Fair enough.
This David Jaffe is a real winner. Remember when they claimed gender (man, woman) and sex (male, female) were separate, but immediately blurred the lines with their language? Just more of the same from a rabid ideologue.
Jaffe- Show me the data Melanie…
Also Jaffe- I only have anecdotal data guys, sorry…
Classic leftoid. "Show your sources! What, you want _my_ sources? Just trust me, bro."
@@thethrashyoneThey believe they are right, and they don’t need to challenged.
@@thethrashyone "It's not my job to educate you!"
I said this multiple times : the emperors new clothes, we live in that world right now. Jaffe and his ilk in LA suffers from herd mentality and is under the spell of shame tactics, so they will applaude the mad king, running around in the street naked, while praising his clothes.
Honestly, shame on them for trying to think they can reason with this nut job.
Jaffe: I want to change the world to fit my ideology. If you don't want it to change you need to give me evidence.
Also Jaffe: What do you mean you want evidence why my ideas are right. What are you a bigot?
it's a known template of the wokes by now.
"If you are passing laws to limit someone's freedom, you better have a reason other than 'it makes me uncomfortable'."
Oh, you mean like how California tried to pass a law to criminalize "misgendering", and how Canada currently has such a law in place? Nothing happens to a person for being misgendered, aside from them having a meltdown that someone doesn't agree with using them. Heck, even if it's purely by accident, some people are still "uncomfortable" by it.
NO
THIS MAN NEEDS TO GET OVER IT
Sorry Buddy but some mentally ill persons right to feel comfortable doesn't not trump my wife and daughters right to feel comfortable.
What a strange little man he is.
Trans women are more likely to be assaulted in men's rooms
Debate shows like these just convince me further and further that democracy was a mistake and we should have never let imperial Rome fall.
If you make me Dictator of the World, I promise that everything will be awesome. Either that or it will all fall apart... IDK. Let's find out.
@@RandomPerson-nd2ey Hey i had the same idea, but my rule will surely work because i totally know exactly what everyone needs to do! I also happen to be Austrian (failed Media-Design Student), it will be great!
@@RandomPerson-nd2ey Very strange to see anyone simp for a system that's frankly just as bad as dictatorship (and if you don't think it is, try putting yourself in the shoes of the one sheep who's desperately trying to out-vote two wolves on what's for dinner). Democracy is such a broken system that even the Greeks, who invented it, couldn't help but poke gaping holes in it. See: Aristotle.
Bottom line, democratic principles NEED to be chained if you don't want them to devolve into tyranny of the majority. A constitution is necessary. Separated branches of government are necessary. An electoral college system is necessary. Filibusters are necessary.
Constitutional republicanism therefore blows your democracy out of the water every day of the week. The Greeks got it wrong, the Romans got it right. Cope.
This idea that the world will be chaotic without laws is so full of crap as if hunter gatherers didn't survive without a single law in existence and we cannot do the same.
Thankfully we don't live in a democracy we live in a constitutional representative republic or we did at one point.
Well good to know that Jaffe swallowed his entire damn leg during this entire conversation.
He makes DSP look like a good guy.
Insane we've gotten to this point.
At least DSP is just a liar.
Jaffe: I don't have a dog in this fight
Also Jaffe: My daughter is trans and goes by they/them
Jaffe: No they (she) were not influenced they(she) just realised on their(her) own
Also Jaffe: Their (Her) friends are all transmen like them (her)
Dude, what the hell?
Was he trolling?
That sounded like parody in the video.
Actually. It's his son who thinks he's a girl and goes by they.
@@justincider8892
Everything will be fine.
😐
This man made Twisted Metal and God of War. What the hell happened?
Yeah, these 90s dudes eventually lost their marbles at some point.
@@lucascoval828 Apparently! lol
To much soy.
@@SailorGreen I never understood why people can't just stay true to themselves. Yeah, time has a way of changing people, but this much? I don't buy it.
Bottom left is a 🤡
As someone who had family (thank god they died before this) would be in these bathrooms and RUclips doesn’t allow what they would be doing. This guy honestly doesn’t know or care about anything but himself and has no clue what he is trying to push or it’s consequences
This is the reason we have "all-gender" restrooms in California with no urinals and piss on every seat.
You can't expect a very fruitful conversation with someone who can't even accept basic facts like sex being based on your dna, not your feelings.
I identify as an X-Wing.
I respect your proton torpedoes.
Do you pee in a hangar now?
“Gay men have been assaulted by straight men forever” umm dude, men fight other men all the time being gay doesn’t make you an exclusive target. I’ve been attacked more times than I can count by other men, I’m straight…but if I was gay it’d be easy to believe it’s was due to that…some men attack those they perceive to be weaker men…your sexuality is a target but so is being skinny, looking goofy, ginger hair, wearing glasses etc etc etc….it’s beyond naïve to think it’s exclusively because your gay. I could get attacked in a toilet based on a whole host of perceived weaknesses. That’s nature…that’s the food chain. Man I’ve seen women attack men and beat the crap out of them…the idea you’ll be safe in a women’s toilet is a blinkered world view.
It’s simple…if you have a penis you’re in the men’s room, no matter anything else.
As an ACTUAL woman, I can't find the words to express how much I despise this guy. I could almost go postal on him.
Dude has been a clown for a while
Jaffe doesn't know what he is talking about🤣
Great job hosting these discussions, Craig.
This is a perfect example of cult mentality
That guy talks a lot but says nothing. He can't even answer the basic question of why is the 1 trans person's feelings more important than the 10 women that also use the bathroom? Oh because "she" feels weird and uncomfortable if she doesn't, what do you think the actual women feel like?
This was QUITE the conversation. Watch the entire episode here: ruclips.net/user/live7qVgOXXIPyY?feature=share
SUBSCRIBE if you're new! THUMBS UP plz
Great show, zero respect for jaffe after this though. x opinions are more valid because feeling basically. How about no, ya goofy bastard
Well there is data, but not academic data which is what I think Jaffe is looking for. Academia is not interested in any real data on trans people that doesn't support them in a positive way. All we have are news articles that people have to look up that may have been deleted. Even so I don't think he'll budge since he seems to just like being right.
If women feel uncomfortable while using the bathroom around men then that's all the data I need.
Somebody should’ve told Jeffy that there’s no such thing as trans kids.
Amen.
They probably have.
This isn't anything he hasn't heard or lied about or weaseled his way around before.
He came into this conversation solely to bash side scrollers.
It's what leftists Do. It's what they've always done.
Not a ounce of humility or understanding anywhere in him.
You really don't need hard data to legitimate a right to privacy and that is ultimately what this guy is trying to speak against.
Bathrooms are separated based on a guilty until proven innocent framework in the first place and it is done for the very reasons explained, at least in part. He argues that trans women aren't men but doesn't seem to speak that we should just let men into the bathrooms. Just completely desegregate them. Well, why not? Men aren't dangerous a-holes, right? Does he have data of men assaulting women in their bathrooms in droves?
See, I neither need data nor do I care to have a pretty good sense that that is what would happen if that were done with our culture operating the way it does. I've heard of unisex bathrooms in other countries but other countries are nurtured under different cultural expectations and those don't just change nor should necessarily be made to just because they arguably could.
See, our bathroom system works for the reasons it does. There's never been a reason to change it until this new kind of thing came along and why should it be made to? Because they have a personal comfort issue whilst also placing the vast majority at risk?
And what's funny is that this guy's argument is the same as hers. That we need to accommodate the feelings of the trans.
The difference is there's no extra risk to the trans people being placed on them. You are, however, placing special risk on the women and it's a sense of risk that is well justified. That's why his argument doesn't work. It's an emotional appeal argument that carries no confirmably extra risk for them to use a normal bathroom and there are other alternatives such as making gender neutral bathrooms for them. But to let them into normal bathrooms under their chosen gender presumes they're the only ones that will use them.
See, he focuses his argument on innocent until proven guilty trans women. Okay... But how do we keep the ones that'd take advantage of that out? See, we can't. All risk on the women but not the trans who biologically have a better chance to fight back if they are attacked comparitively.
The math just doesn't work in this guy's favor
No, but listen to what he's saying "Get over it". If you're a transwoman, and you feel uncomfortable in the men's bathroom, get over it. In fact, if you're feeling uncomfortable in a "male body" get over it.
It's simple. All these spaces are "sex-based" spaces. Not "gender identity" spaces.
The sophists and the ideologues took advantage of the fact that most people use "sex" and "gender" synonymously, claimed every sex-based space was a "gender"-based space, and then injected their new definition of "gender" as a social construct of whatever anyone decides it means and/or a self-defined thing. And then claimed that excluding anyone from a newly invented category of "gender identity" was bigoted, unfair, and "rights-denying" discrimination.
Bathrooms, locker-rooms, sports, prisons, female safe-houses, women-only spas/saunas, and other such spaces are SEX-based. Defined wholly on your biological sex. And for the people with Sexual Disorders like intersex, Swyer's Syndrome, etc. are not an issue with these spaces, nor have they been. These exceptions still produce phenotypical male or female people, who have no issue identifying and living as one sex or the other.
Men should have told women to get over it when they wanted to enter gentlemen’s clubs and other male only spaces. Now that they have argued men aren’t allowed to have men only spaces, they cannot argue that women should.
Fair.
Cringe all around
100%
I gotta say that’s exceptionally (and somewhat delightfully) evil to put that clip up front 🤣
Woman is now the victim. They are being eliminated,
3:57 "Why"
Well frankly a lot of people out there know how absurd their arguments are and are too self-aware to go and spew them out in an honest discussion. It's much better to just scream at people through a megaphone to bully them into compliance.
regardless of what anyone thinks about anyone's opinion, these are the kinds of discussions we need to be having if we are actually going to get anywhere
The alphabet mafia needs to get over the fact that the world doesn't revolve around them.
Women have been attacked by "trans women" in restrooms. All he has to do is watch/read the news. Hasn't this guy heard about male prisoners claiming to be trans just to get into the women's prison?
Clown world indeed.
Honestly I think this David Jaffe character wants everyone to use the women's bathroom so he doesn't have to deal with urinal anxiety.
I wonder what the statistics on female pregnancy whilst in woman's prisons has risen by... Hmmmm?
I feel it should be publicly presented when a comment section has be wiped of all comments in favor of one side of the argument. 60k views and only 200 likes, seems suspicious that there's no comments stating why they did not like the video.
Wait. Is this THEE David Jaffe?
"Where's the numbers?" Oh, okay, David... there have been several 'trans' women who went into female spaces, and assaulted the actual women in them. Off the top of my head, I can think of woman's prisons, there was that spa that a mom and her daughter got sued for keeping away from the trans woman who intruded... and, there's a case in Canada where a multiple time offender went to aestheticians, and demanded they wax 'her' gooch, and 'she' has been sued over it basically every time, because of how they have to kick 'her' out.
This guy is frequently on the same podcasts with Collin Moriarty. His takes are all over the place. Usually frustrating. He's as slippery as an eel cus I can't get a hold of him.
He thinks that the gaming industry is going in the right direction with gamepass. He thinks that we should embrace AI writers in our entertainment. His idea of "liberalism" has no limit - that anything that breaks the tradition will be automatically good for society. ALWAYS.
@@StarChildInABubbletextbook extremist right there
@@StarChildInABubble cultural marxism.
"If a man has two boobs on their back, and it makes them uncomfortable..." So, dismorphia? Or, you know, that thing that got removed from the 'qualifiers' for being trans?
If men are a risk, do they stop being a risk when they decide to identify as a woman? Does that somehow make them safer than they were before? What is Jaffee talking about?
Jaffe looking for "data" for this is like if straight men wanted "data" to show they shouldn't also be allowed to be in women's bathrooms.
P3d0 David Jaffe.
What a fruit loop 😅
For all this talk of data coming from a guy who buys into transgenders and their idea of 72+ and counting genders xD.
UHHHHHHHHHHHHH Why does David have toilet bowl cleaner in his office??
I think you should do more clips from the show
Yup! It's going to be a regular thing on the channel!
I just realized this is the same clown that said Metroid Dread had bad game design
David Jaffe is correct
I used to like him until he continued to talk, showing who he really is… I gave up on him a while ago. He’s a product of his own ego. 🤷🏻♂️
Her: "Men in a bathroom leaves women feel unsafe and uncomfortable"
Him: "Your real problem is that evil people and mentally ill exist. The real solution is to rid the world of all evil actions"
I think public restrooms are already some of the most unsafe places and we're arguing the wrong things with this trans stuff the only thing I see there is it's not gonna make anything better maybe we should pass laws to make the places safer period retool the stalls and whatnot have an open washroom separate from the toilets and a 1 person private washroom for use as needed for when washing hands isn't gonna cut or I'm sure there's a million better ways than what we do now
Isn't this a gaming channel?
That's over on Side Scroller Plays channel.
@@tmb11212
Awesome.
Thanks.
🫡
That's funny, the guy sounds a lot like you Craig.
I like how they just let this idiot talk and dig his hole deeper after shaming a woman for feeling unsafe.
Travis is a token
Ok maybe it would be safer for women to go I to the male bathroom.
I feel like the way the first 10 seconds is presented is a little disingenuous. Maybe I'm wrong, but I felt like he was being sarcastic and that was lost in the intro. Not talking shit, I'm a fan. Just throwing it out there.
What even is this channel? It aint about games half the time
Games AND culture. Personally, I like it.
Kotaku: muh gender pay gap
Crickets
Destructoid: Drumph
Crickets
PC gamer: muh sexism
Crickets
Sidescrollers: quit inserting your politics in our space, weirdos
No. Politics! REEEEEEE
It’s about games and politics. It’s also about politics because that’s the world we live in now. What I like about Sidescrollers though is that they aren’t some woke boring channel running defense for the corrupt and morally bankrupt liberal zombie machine.
@@ggodhand3559 touch grass bro
I get the feeling i'm supposed to disagree with Jaffe considering this video's target audience but he does a really good job making his points and the girl absolutely failed to refute them.
It's hard to watch this after watchingbthe whole thing unedited.
I put my money into side scrollers from the very beginning. I like criag. I believed he was in it for a good time, I still do but his constant attack on the trans community has made me pull funding. I can't sit here and think that his agenda isn't supportive of people like me and the people I know and love.
I'm not for religious strong points when it comes to politics either, I actually hate when people try to run politics with religion.
We came to America to fight the churches banks and taxes.
So criag I love ya man but I can't support the scrolls if you can't support or at least try to understand my people. 😢
I'm taking Jaffe's side on this he was a fantastic guest and good work getting him on the show
I thought he held his own against all three of you. I'll be most liking checking out his channel.
He said men are toxic and naturally dangerous then is ok with biological men going to woman's washroom............ these two logics don't stick 🤔☕
Wiley, appreciate your feedback. Can you point to a specific instance of the "constant attack on the trans community"? Do you see this video as an "attack?" I (Craig) have said all along, I don't care how you live as long as you don't tell me how to live mine. You feel like you're a girl or a boy, whatever. My hard line in the sand is when it involves kids.
@SideScrollersPodcast Craig I appreciate your opinions and respect your stance, I to have two kids, and they mean the world to me.
Nothing is more important than protecting them.
That being said I can't help but feel offended when you talk about Trans people and the community, you've referred to it as a clown world I laughed it off and continued to support and try to understand your side of the issue.
I'm a very understanding individual, so I view the world from all perspectives before I form an opinion or a stance.
I also try to learn as much as possible about a subject before dismissing it.
Now it's very good to have an opinion it's even better to have a civil conversation with peers that disagree with you ,
When I say attack on the Trans community it's mostly because you don't respect the pronoun, and that the subject of the Trans community comes up more on your channel then any other gaming platform and its showered in negative light. I will say some of the subjects you've brought up I'll agree with you on. The women from limited run that was falsely fired. Yeah that was Bs. And I'm on your side there.
But the whole disrespecting the pronouns thing not acknowledged them ignoring or flat out refusing to use them is disrespectful and bullish.
You dont have to agree, but you can disagree respectfully.
You say Trans is a new thing and it's due to social media but then how do you explain the Edo period in Japan , The Trans riots at the Tenderlion upheaval in 1966. (Pre dates the stonewall riots.) Celebration itakes place in ptown every year for that riot.
How do you explain Ann Bonnie or Mary Reed famous Trans pirates dated back in the 1700.
Trans people deserve validation. I am tired of the women's bathroom being the be all end all debate plug to discredit them. Fine take the bathroom 🚻 if that makes you feel better, but don't act like Trans people deserve to be called out bullied and disrespected.
As far as giving kids proper therapy to understand if there transgender, or to understand why they think they might be transgender I'm all for it therapy shouldn't be dismissed or vilified everyone needs a Lil therapy. Inwishbi got more as a young adult.
As for hormones and surgery we are all adults here sure let's talk about it. That's a subject worth discussing and coming up with the best solution to benefit the youths of tomorrow and the future of today. It's a very slippery subject and I don't mind having real discussion about it at all.
One more thing criag ever thought of having a Natalie Wynn of contra points on side scrollers she's a former conservative that is not only level headed but is very grounded in Philosophy, economics, politics and religion. If your going to have any one on this channel to discuss the issues you bring forward, it would be her.
When women were given the right to vote without the responsibility of dealing with their actions this is where it ends up.
There have been men who claimed to be trans for the lols.
What makes this wojack think some won't use it to creep on women in the one place they can feel absolutely safe?
I don't believe this guy made GOW, but that's beside the point.
he wasn't wrong if you think he was you don't know how to listen
Oh they do, you’re just trying to defend an indefensible position.
Jaffe constantly talks “show data, show data,” but never provides it himself. He always submits to the fallacy of “well I’m not trans so I can’t say.” He has no arguments, he has feelings, and yet Melanie’s feelings, she just needs to “get over them.”