You can actually see much sharper images and detail with a good 90mm refractor. Edit: To be clear, what you will see on the eyepiece is MUCH better than what these videos show. If he stacked and processed the images from these videos, the result would be much better as well. I have a 100mm APO refractor and the images at the eyepiece are incredible and the images I can capture and process blew away all my expectations.
@@nonegone7170 which is why I explained what he's representing in his video isn't even close to what you can see. But most processed images are better than what you will see in the eyepiece.
@@nonegone7170 90 mm is more than enough to view most of the Messier object. Also something that equally matters is the lens- is it a doublet, APO, glass and the most importantly the mount. Say the focal length is 900 mm, and with a good 40 mm eyepiece, you can see DSOs. The reason is that with this configuration, the exit pupil is around 5.5 mm which is the requirement to see Galaxies and Nebulaes.
I'm a student of literature but interested in watching the sky.. till now I was using my phone to click the night sky pictures but a couple of days back I found some videos on making a telescope refractor. I searched through the internet and found out that I can get the kit including a 50mm achromatic lens of 700mm focal length, two eye pieces, a focuser and one diagonal. And from videos I think I can make one. So this is going to be my first telescope. But now the more I go deep in this I found that there are different telescope lenses like 50mm, 60mm, 75mm, and 90mm. And now I'm thinking about getting a 90mm lens with 700mm focal length. But that is costly. So now first I'm going to get a 50mm telescope kit and then in future I'll update the lens to 90mm.
I'm a student of literature but interested in watching the sky.. till now I was using my phone to click the night sky pictures but a couple of days back I found some videos on making a telescope refractor. I searched through the internet and found out that I can get the kit including a 50mm achromatic lens of 700mm focal length, two eye pieces, a focuser and one diagonal. And from videos I think I can make one. So this is going to be my first telescope. But now the more I go deep in this I found that there are different telescope lenses like 50mm, 60mm, 75mm, and 90mm. And now I'm thinking about getting a 90mm lens with 700mm focal length. But that is costly. So now first I'm going to get a 50mm telescope kit and then in future I'll update the lens to 90mm.
It might be very useful if you provided the type of camera being used, if you used any in-camera digital zooming and/or whether you did any cropping/reframing in post processing.
You should try image stacking the andromeda galaxy, You can see the outline of the hidden pixels. Stacking would give you more detail each picture, I had a 120mm and stacked the pleiades and got great pics of the gasses surrounding it!
I can see with my 90mm refractor Jupiter with his clouds ( two brown lines ) in live and stackt i can See even more , on one afternoon i saw the red spot After i stackt the Image . You pickt Jupiter by bad weather i think. Becaude saturn looks Like nearly the same in my Teleskop
This looks terrible - i've seen Andromeda through 8x42 binoculars more clearly and with more detail (small, but looked way better than in this movie). This looks like observations in the center of a big city in a really hot summer night. Remember kids - best view is in the winter.
im able to see the brown lines across jupiter and all of its moons without a barlow, think of a barlow like zooming in on an image in your camera photos, the details are closer but arent any sharper, so you can still see the general colour and detail of most planets without a barlow :)
90mm what? Focal lenght??? I am new with the telescopes and i dont know nothing about them. PLEASE someone explain to me how can i watch the moon with details! :(
if you just want to observe, you will need a telescope with a pretty wide focal length ; you can begin with a 8" dobson, it's an amazing and cheap telescope
@@raffaelepilia6218 I second that. An 8" dob is THE ultimate starter scope. It will give great detail on planets and has enough light gathering power to let you wxplore deep sky objects like galaxies and nebula. You can go for a 6" if the size and weight of the 8" is too much for you. For most it's a lifetime scope. After that if you're more interested in astrophotography go for a good quality APO refractor in the 100 to 130mm range. You'll je able to xaptruee insane images of anything with one of those. If you're addicted to chasing down deep sky objects to see with your own eyes, go for a bigger dob in the 12 to 16" range.
This is all low-hanging fruit, all fairly meaningless. In the Southern Hemisphere, you should try whether you can see the spiral arms of barred spiral NGC1365. For quality of optics, you should try to split Beta Muscae (a bright star, easy to find) with two roughly equal components separated by 1.4 arc seconds. Those two - or indeed any number of items of similar difficult - would be a MUCH more meaningful test than this crap you have posted.
Very nice. The DSOs were great to see .... Thanks for posting!
You can actually see much sharper images and detail with a good 90mm refractor.
Edit: To be clear, what you will see on the eyepiece is MUCH better than what these videos show.
If he stacked and processed the images from these videos, the result would be much better as well.
I have a 100mm APO refractor and the images at the eyepiece are incredible and the images I can capture and process blew away all my expectations.
Generally what people mean by the phrase 'what can you see with this size telescope', it means for visual astronomy.
@@nonegone7170 which is why I explained what he's representing in his video isn't even close to what you can see. But most processed images are better than what you will see in the eyepiece.
@@nonegone7170 90 mm is more than enough to view most of the Messier object. Also something that equally matters is the lens- is it a doublet, APO, glass and the most importantly the mount. Say the focal length is 900 mm, and with a good 40 mm eyepiece, you can see DSOs. The reason is that with this configuration, the exit pupil is around 5.5 mm which is the requirement to see Galaxies and Nebulaes.
I'm a student of literature but interested in watching the sky.. till now I was using my phone to click the night sky pictures but a couple of days back I found some videos on making a telescope refractor. I searched through the internet and found out that I can get the kit including a 50mm achromatic lens of 700mm focal length, two eye pieces, a focuser and one diagonal. And from videos I think I can make one. So this is going to be my first telescope. But now the more I go deep in this I found that there are different telescope lenses like 50mm, 60mm, 75mm, and 90mm. And now I'm thinking about getting a 90mm lens with 700mm focal length. But that is costly. So now first I'm going to get a 50mm telescope kit and then in future I'll update the lens to 90mm.
I'm a student of literature but interested in watching the sky.. till now I was using my phone to click the night sky pictures but a couple of days back I found some videos on making a telescope refractor. I searched through the internet and found out that I can get the kit including a 50mm achromatic lens of 700mm focal length, two eye pieces, a focuser and one diagonal. And from videos I think I can make one. So this is going to be my first telescope. But now the more I go deep in this I found that there are different telescope lenses like 50mm, 60mm, 75mm, and 90mm. And now I'm thinking about getting a 90mm lens with 700mm focal length. But that is costly. So now first I'm going to get a 50mm telescope kit and then in future I'll update the lens to 90mm.
Thank you for this video. It gives me a very good idea of what what I can hopr to see with my scopes.
It might be very useful if you provided the type of camera being used, if you used any in-camera digital zooming and/or whether you did any cropping/reframing in post processing.
true also what telescope :(
Thanks for sharing. I had the opportunity to see a rocket launch in 2018. Amazing experience. I shared a pretty cool montage of the trip to my page.
You should try image stacking the andromeda galaxy, You can see the outline of the hidden pixels. Stacking would give you more detail each picture, I had a 120mm and stacked the pleiades and got great pics of the gasses surrounding it!
Care to show the picture???
Superb video,❤️❤️❤️ thank you for sharing 🙏😀🎉🎉🎉🎉 like70
I can see with my 90mm refractor Jupiter with his clouds ( two brown lines ) in live and stackt i can See even more , on one afternoon i saw the red spot After i stackt the Image .
You pickt Jupiter by bad weather i think. Becaude saturn looks Like nearly the same in my Teleskop
I gather you did not use the Barlow 3x lens?
This looks terrible - i've seen Andromeda through 8x42 binoculars more clearly and with more detail (small, but looked way better than in this movie). This looks like observations in the center of a big city in a really hot summer night. Remember kids - best view is in the winter.
Eyepiece?
No info of the equipment used and how the images were magnified. Very unhelpful and time wasted!
of course if you want planet detail you need a 2x barlow, dont think you can see it just with the retail eye pieces.
im able to see the brown lines across jupiter and all of its moons without a barlow, think of a barlow like zooming in on an image in your camera photos, the details are closer but arent any sharper, so you can still see the general colour and detail of most planets without a barlow :)
@@user-yx6ol9gv2i I guess if you have a more expensive eyepiece then yes. but a 2x is at least needed to see the planet as a planet.
What kind of telescope did you belong to?
what size Eyepiece did you use for these images
Same question I have!
Name of the song? thanks
The Cosmos - Sirius Beat
ruclips.net/video/Bkg08NvtvBU/видео.html
your welcome
what about a 300 mm telescope
90mm what? Focal lenght??? I am new with the telescopes and i dont know nothing about them. PLEASE someone explain to me how can i watch the moon with details! :(
if you just want to observe, you will need a telescope with a pretty wide focal length ; you can begin with a 8" dobson, it's an amazing and cheap telescope
@@raffaelepilia6218 Thanks
@@raffaelepilia6218 I second that. An 8" dob is THE ultimate starter scope. It will give great detail on planets and has enough light gathering power to let you wxplore deep sky objects like galaxies and nebula. You can go for a 6" if the size and weight of the 8" is too much for you.
For most it's a lifetime scope.
After that if you're more interested in astrophotography go for a good quality APO refractor in the 100 to 130mm range. You'll je able to xaptruee insane images of anything with one of those.
If you're addicted to chasing down deep sky objects to see with your own eyes, go for a bigger dob in the 12 to 16" range.
This is all low-hanging fruit, all fairly meaningless. In the Southern Hemisphere, you should try whether you can see the spiral arms of barred spiral NGC1365. For quality of optics, you should try to split Beta Muscae (a bright star, easy to find) with two roughly equal components separated by 1.4 arc seconds. Those two - or indeed any number of items of similar difficult - would be a MUCH more meaningful test than this crap you have posted.