Those are two different things (with the same ending and file type). The first is just the mesh, which gets pre-processed in GCX, the second is the input deck for calculix - which reads the output of the pre-processing we did in GCX.
@@torstenschenkel2110 Dear Prof, I followed every step of your tutorial. Despite that, I get the following error: [precice] ERROR: Receive using sockets failed with system error: read: End of file Please guide me through this.
I follow the same step that demos in the video, but it will dissipate at 1.5 ms. May I ask you how to change the boundary condition that it will dissipate at 8 ms?
@@torstenschenkel2110 Thank you for your response. Have you been able to generate any surface files using CGX that have the same format as those of the tutorial? Have sent an email to you as well with a detailed explanation. Thank you!
Hi, just had a quick look at the files you sent. Your material properties (Calculix) and the pressure boundary conditions (OpenFOAM) are a mix of the tutorial case and this one. There may be other things different to the case I ran. Check your case again and make sure that the BCs and material properties match up.
You setup for the mesh of solidShell.inp and later work with tube.inp. Why is that ?? Please explain, Professor.
Those are two different things (with the same ending and file type). The first is just the mesh, which gets pre-processed in GCX, the second is the input deck for calculix - which reads the output of the pre-processing we did in GCX.
@@torstenschenkel2110 do we always use the filename "tube" ??
@@sandipgewali641 You can call it whatever you like 🙂
@@torstenschenkel2110 Dear Prof, I followed every step of your tutorial. Despite that, I get the following error:
[precice] ERROR: Receive using sockets failed with system error: read: End of file
Please guide me through this.
I follow the same step that demos in the video, but it will dissipate at 1.5 ms. May I ask you how to change the boundary condition that it
will dissipate at 8 ms?
Hi
Were you able to adjust boundary conditions to stop the case from diverging?
Mine diverges at exactly 0.0101 second
That's 10.1 ms. It will diverge when the reflected wave comes in. That's why the original benchmark only goes to 8ms.
@@torstenschenkel2110 Thank you for your response.
Have you been able to generate any surface files using CGX that have the same format as those of the tutorial?
Have sent an email to you as well with a detailed explanation.
Thank you!
I have send a e-mail to you, please check! thanks!
Can't really check at the moment. Please note that this case will break after the reflected wave comes back. So it will break at some point after 8ms.
Hi, just had a quick look at the files you sent. Your material properties (Calculix) and the pressure boundary conditions (OpenFOAM) are a mix of the tutorial case and this one. There may be other things different to the case I ran. Check your case again and make sure that the BCs and material properties match up.