TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Introduction 00:16 Access vs Phenomenal Consciousness 06:40 Philosophers vs Lay People (regarding Phenomenology) 15:56 Bridging the Gap 18:50 Issues with Common Sense 24:40 Folk Dualism 28:51 Free Will & Cultural Differences 37:48 Compatibilism vs Incompatibilism 41:10 The Self & Personal Identity 46:00 Moral Responsibility 50:00 Determinism (Robert Sapolsky) 53:30 Materialism (Daniel Dennett) 59:52 Edouard's Upcoming Book ("When Science Goes Wrong") 1:04:00 Conclusion THANKS FOR WATCHING! If you enjoyed the content, please like this video, subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications for future updates. :)
Matter is mathematically describable. Feelings are not. Math can describe dopamine's mass, momentum, electrostatic charge, density, shape, position, etc. Math can't describe dopamine's "pleasure". Logic cannot categorize it. Reason can't derive it from any premise. The phenomenon is categorically distinct from the matter. What is that other category? What is that thing categorically different from measurable matter? It's not "non-existant"; it's "all-important". We literally care only about the pleasure; we don't give a hoot about the material dopamine.
It is true that a nonprofessional to a given discipline is effectively a lay person to that discipline, however, lay person is generally meant as outsider/ignorant and it is easy to interpret, as a viewer, the use of the term lay person as an insult. I can't make head or tails because of your guest's accent.
![Hunxho - Ball Forever [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nki9ZTF9Uls/mqdefault.jpg)
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 Introduction
00:16 Access vs Phenomenal Consciousness
06:40 Philosophers vs Lay People (regarding Phenomenology)
15:56 Bridging the Gap
18:50 Issues with Common Sense
24:40 Folk Dualism
28:51 Free Will & Cultural Differences
37:48 Compatibilism vs Incompatibilism
41:10 The Self & Personal Identity
46:00 Moral Responsibility
50:00 Determinism (Robert Sapolsky)
53:30 Materialism (Daniel Dennett)
59:52 Edouard's Upcoming Book ("When Science Goes Wrong")
1:04:00 Conclusion
THANKS FOR WATCHING!
If you enjoyed the content, please like this video, subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications for future updates. :)
Thanks for the conversation. Always. Best guest roster I know of. I'm slowly catching-up. :-)
Always a pleasure Walter! Great to have you back ;)
Matter is mathematically describable. Feelings are not.
Math can describe dopamine's mass, momentum, electrostatic charge, density, shape, position, etc. Math can't describe dopamine's "pleasure". Logic cannot categorize it. Reason can't derive it from any premise.
The phenomenon is categorically distinct from the matter.
What is that other category? What is that thing categorically different from measurable matter? It's not "non-existant"; it's "all-important". We literally care only about the pleasure; we don't give a hoot about the material dopamine.
It is true that a nonprofessional to a given discipline is effectively a lay person to that discipline, however, lay person is generally meant as outsider/ignorant and it is easy to interpret, as a viewer, the use of the term lay person as an insult. I can't make head or tails because of your guest's accent.
👀🤭 @ ~18:50
Personal identity of the descendants of slaves (culture of pimps)!