New chancellor promises to 'get Britain building' with policy plans
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 июл 2024
- Krishnan Guru-Murthy: "The new Chancellor Rachel Reeves has set out the Labour Government's first policy announcements as MPs started to arrive at Westminster.
(Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
More than half of them were newly elected on Thursday. Sir Keir Starmer returned from his visits to Northern Ireland and Wales for a photo op with his 411 MPs - a clear illustration of Labour's huge majority, as Gary Gibbon reports."
-----------------------
Follow us:
Facebook - / channel4news
Twitter - / channel4news
TikTok - / c4news
Instagram - / channel4news
Labour got only 33% of the vote on a turnout of less than 60% - voting system needs overhauling.
They got a "thumping majority" within the voting system that we have, and that is what matters. Also, the British people voted very convincingly against PR in 2011, and you can't overturn referendums, ever... apparently.
@@isotropisch82 thumping majority with less votes than Tories under Boris, and even less votes than Corbyn.
@@isotropisch82adding that one to the repertoire lol
funny how people only start complaining about vote share and electoral reform when the Tories suffer their biggest defeat in living memory....
In case you'd forgotten we had a referendum in 2011 about electoral reform and the NO camp won by 67%
As we know with referendums a result of 52% or more means we can never ever discuss the subject ever again and we cannot overturn "the will of the people".
@@isotropisch82 That was "alternative vote" (AV), not proportional representation (PR) as you suggested. They're two different systems - the takeaway being that AV doesn't really work that well either lol
Why are they talking about building prisons and houses. Stop people coming in!!!
They will stop coming in if they think they will go to prison.
We need all 3
they're actually looking to free prisoners to free up space
@@keithperks8773 Please explain how the UK has Prisons and no Criminals. I'm intrigued.
We should also stop people having children.
Labour did this in the 60's. What could possibly go wrong? :]
Here’s a thought: if you hadn’t of imported millions and millions of people over the past 27 years, we wouldn’t need to concrete over our entire countrywide. Yet again, clue less ministers and their progressive, mass immigration agenda.
You seem to forget or ignore the reality people die, do you know how many people die each year? a close to one million each year in 27 years that is close to half of the population gone for good, without immigrant the birth will be a lot less than today, do the maths
if you go to every construction that is happening right now you find the majority are immigrants working there, selfish people always point their fingers and can't think or see the bigger picture.
@@mw89181 literally all of that drivel is bollox. You wouldn’t know a fact if you caught your mrs in bed with one
Do you actually have a job? own a house? or just hatred of anybody different? Because this country has built on immigrants for the last 2 centuries my friend, if you are educated enough to know your history
Who are they building them for?
Immigrants.
They have already filled existing buildings and pushed house prices up so it would be better to identify who these millions are before we decide if they should stay or return to their ccountries of origin.
@Shaun-e9y Proves where the evil is
Just what I was thinking
@Shaun-e9y.................round here too.........buy to let ....young couples or not so young can not buy the little traditional two up two down to do up anymore......
@Shaun-e9y And we know that all white landlords are saints.
They building 1.5 million hotels for our sea people.
I hope the media ask the following on her building plan:
1. She said 1.5m homes will be built under Labour in the next 5 years, but how many of those were to be built anyway? The UK was building 200,000 per year, so it seems 500,000 extra.
2. Who will build them? An extra 100,000 per year would need thousands of tradespeople. Are these people sitting around idle? Indeed, the figure will be higher, as any site given the go ahead will take 1-2 years before holes are dug in the ground.
3. If these will be recruited and trained, from where? Will Labour reduce the 50% of children to university and instead encourage blue collar work? Will there be diversity targets for hod carriers?
4. Will the new houses have ample hopsital and GP places, schools, roads and such services? The pesky planning rules that hold up large developments are usually because there is no infrastructure with developers preferring to build the homes and give cash to the council, so the residents move in and wait 5-10 years for the council to get enough money to build the infrastructure and staff to be trained. And developers prefer to over-develop cities and large towns rather than where councils are desperate for housing, which is why they want to destroy the green belt that surrounds London, but not touch unprotected land up North, the South West or Scotland.
5. Much of the green belt supports wildlife and protected species, which the pesky planning rules protect. Will this be disregarded?
6. If the UK has net migration of 750,000, but builds 300,000 homes (with mostly flats in urban areas) and UK average occupancy is 2.36, this will leave 42,000 homeless each year, so 210,000 over the 5 years. It will also block UK youngsters getting on the ladder. How will this be addressed?
7. From where will the materials be sourced, especially for green energy? 78% of Co2 global emissions is from world freight and anything built in China ignores labour laws and Co2 targets, so will this count toward the 2030 net zero target for the UK?
I suspect she will discover very quickly why house building has been low and why immigration needs to be tackled to enable the UK infrastructure to catch up.
The extra builders needed....on top of the extra doctors, nurses, police, etc already promised to materialise miraculously.....
Good points... Maybe time to reverse Blairs useless Mickey mouse degrees at Uni and make entrance to Uni on merit base, not the DEI box ticking it's become. Of course the whole purpose is to indoctrinate young minds the evolutionary Communist way.
Instead, encourage apprenticeships, skills learning to the main stream, the youngsters will be 1000% better prepared for the world of work & life, let alone the boost it would give to the economy.
The answer is immigration,
Lots and lots of it.
"" Get Britain Building "" ? Every where I go I see new estates being built .Thirty years or so ago England was the most densely populated country in Europe by far . Big business building companies must be jumping for joy .WE NEED OUR OPEN SPACES .STOP IMMIGRATION FOR A DECENT QUALITY LIFE .The infrastructure cannot cope now .( Get a piece of turf now ,it could be a collective item !
Agreed 💯
100%
Agree this is an island ?
@@delfine7163100%
It was the same last time they got in " breath of fresh air " just wait ,come the next election you will be begging to get them out.
No. In 8 years we will. But they may still win even then as there will be even more young voters and immigrants.
You know it.🤪
We want them out already.
yup
Didn't want them in.
Basically private developers have no interest in building non-profitable properties, They won't build schools, infrastructure, gp surgerys, hospitals, parks, social housing. They will build houses but not social housing. It is necessary to place onerous requirements, in reality failing to do so will result in no social houses or infrastructure.
@justgeneric2876 The government have the answer to that right now, they control planning permission and if builders do not want to build infrastructure, they will be denied planning permission to build houses and without that they are stuffed.
All the housing that gets built are not for profit via consumer market but for profit through government hedge funds it's a socialist corporation aka: fascism. If you're an ACTUAL private developer good luck trying to get permission to build hahaha
Then it should be built by a government department and not farmed out to private business.
@@boota1979 this never happens though. In west Sussex they build more and more houses and never touch the infrastructure. A 100 house development is currently being built. It's planning consent says this will only add an additional 17 cars using the road. It's pathetic. The public sector in this country in an embarrassment.
Agreed, all builders are interested in are parasitic housing estates that leach off existing second and third places. I live in a village and there are 5 housing estates being built or recently finished. None of them have parks, shops, offices or schools
They only got 1/3 of the votes but got 2/3 of the seats. Bring in proportional representation.
Funny no one was calling for this when it was Conservatives who were in government with a minority of the public having voted for them!
@@biscuitbrakes8480
In 2019 the Tories got 43.6% of the vote on a 67.5% turn out. That is the equivalent of 29% of the electorate at that time. They got an 80 seat majority.
This time, Labour got 33% of the vote on a 59% turn out. That is the equivalent of just 20% of the electorate. Yet they got a 174 seat majority.
Many of us have been calling for PR for many years but neither of the two main parties will ever let us have it because if they do, they know they will probably never be fully in charge ever again.
In 2011 we only got the offer because the LibDems who were then in coalition, demanded we have the choice to adopt PR. The version offered was not PR.
@@biscuitbrakes8480 I'm traditionally Conservative (not necessarily a Conservative party voter). I've been calling for PR since 1988. We've got to a point where Labour and Tory expect to be in power. It's no longer a priveledge to them, it's a forgone conclusion.
Left wing and Right wing need to come together on this, the system is broken and not fit for purpose. Personally I'd prefer Direct Democracy like Iceland or Switzerland, but I don't see that happening in my lifetime.
Whilst FPTP isn't perfect it ensure stable governments. PR would be ok if you could guarantee that one party would always achieve an overall majority.
The reality is that PR results in coalition governments, which tend to be short lived. Italy governments last on average 1.1 years and achieve very little.
two things on that:
1. From a position of opposition, political parties cannot change the voting system so they did what they could within the current system.
2. Labour and Lib Dems got the majority of the votes and would simply be forming a coalition under PR with Starmer and his team as the major players in a very similar government.
Great idea let’s just ignore the elephant in the room (over population) and build more houses for more people, tarmac the green belt , more traffic congestion, more queues for GPs, over burdened NHS, full schools, more stress and lower quality of life for everyone under Labour.
More more more
Well if you have voted for any of the mainstream parties over the last 25 to 30 years you can't complain. They have all been committed to mass immigration, the inevitable consequence of which is the destruction of our 'green and pleasant land'.
Obviously they haven't but Yvette Cooper is in charge of the Home office not Rachel Reeves so that will be a separate announcement.
And as this describes its not about greenbelt but building on brown belt and grey belt land
Seem to purposely ignore the fact it was the conservatives in charge for 14 years, yes??? Bigotry at its finest
So over population is to blame for a severly underfunded and understaffed NHS, crumbling and understaffed schools, overworked GPs, and terrible public services and utilities not 14 years of Austerity, Brexit and the Tory's?
Ghettos she means like Belgium, Demark, Sweden that dont work and crime rate rises. Locals get ready.
Well if they are for a certain type then ghettos for sure.
People like nasty nimby Francis is kiss are that born people might get a home and be happy… those people can’t have that!
Clueless labour will destroy the environment and landscape
Come on stop the drama! And who’s the one with the clue then?
And stand up to the Building Firms and Developers and lay down the rules for them. Why subsidize an industry that will not co operate with social obligations?
Naive 😂, the whole reason why this mess started was because socialist policies put in place by labour 80 years ago
@@EzraMerr It actually started in the 80s when social housing stopped being built. Our grandparents only got such affordable housing because of the post-WW2 government housing boom.
Suggest you go and do some research... No new housing projects in your area I guess too as they would have to interact with your community and there is a requirement for a certain number of houses to be social housing in any new housing project... Fact is that it is almost a wonder we have any new housing being built at all given the requirements , but not a wonder when you look at the cost of houses...
Shut the border.
Bot
Thank for your input I'm sure they hadn't thought of that.....cretin
@@dancoy09its not open, never has been
@@user-bu9nb8wr6e open the border to your brain
Fighting putting houses on old airstrips and previously developed land is ridiculous.
Exactly, it used to be an airport FFS. . doesn't get any more polluting than that surely !? . If we build green / insulated housing surely that's a good thing ?? .. a new estate just went up near where I live and every house has solar built on it .. surely that's better than an airport !
@abot5381 that will need regulation and control from the government rather than letting the private sector dictate
ruclips.net/video/FXHkFZ-nG4Y/видео.htmlfeature=shared
@abot5381 All Labour are doing is creating assets only the rich can afford. The rich will buy them and rent them back to us. Meanwhile the rich will pay no tax and we will all continue to get poorer. none of these actions are drastic enough to tackle anything.
1 million houses granted planning permission in the UK since 2015 remain unbuilt
If we didn't have half the third world here living for FREE we wouldn't need to build a fraction of the homes.
We wouldn’t need to build any at all zero we would have spare the white British population is shrinking. While they encourage it to do so while importing your replacement at your expense.
True .......Been saying this for ages we don't need more homes we need less people......
We the taxpayers need to stand UP against it by STOPPING our taxes being ABUSED and USED for these FREELOADERS!. STOP paying taxes and they will QUICKLY sort this BS out!!!
We pay for these people to get priority over us while these rats smile with glee like it’s them who are doing the right thing they are taking from us!
@@azillliasmith2734 , And "HOLIDAY HOMES" banned!. NOBODY should be able to buy a SECOND home to use ONCE a year whilst others are living on the damn streets because of it!!!
Listened to her a few times making exuses already worse mess that WW2 which is lies last labour government left a note stating no money in the treasury and sold off the UK gold reserves anc started an illegal war and Blair was to blame for mass immigration 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Different coloured turds ... same latrine my friend
The tories are a Tony Blair party they unfortunately died on that hill.
@@ramsay9073 After Maggie Thatcher had finished Labour had to spend money. Over the Thatcher year many schools and Hospitals were in a terrible state. More social housing was needed because Maggie sold off thousands of council houses and for what......to keep from raising the high tax limit by just 1%. And as for unemployment, that rocketed due to all the industry closing down. Someone really should have told her that everyone becoming a shopkeeper doesn't work, you just get thousands of bankruptcies and repossessions (although I shouldn't complain about that one, I was a Locksmith at the time with way too much work).
Building for who exactly, not with my taxes they won't.
Unfortunately none of us can choose what our taxes are used for.
@@jjefferyworboys8138 Wrong I can.
Building 'again' . England is a 1/4 the size of France. Literally everywhere i go there are 4 out or 5 rat mazes going up. 330,000 a year.
Theres no point in just making our island a giant Grey Hostel. If you want to get young people on the housing ladder, why not just limit immigration to Blair levels (which were 20 times higher than any in history) rather than the 800,000 to 1.1 million a year we've seen for the last 5 years?
Labour... no different to the Tories. None at all.
Except they have already announced they will be bringing down immigration in parallel
Because immigration is the easiest way to grow the economy. Politicians don’t actually care about the housing crisis. They just pretend they do to get votes. Labour can’t point build enough extra houses for even the 400,000 net immigration it will allow. But all it has to do is to be able to say tried at the next election and then blame others for preventing it.
If you’re young in this country then unless you have wealthy parents or a very good job you’re probably better off leaving.
So much for our "Green and Pleasant Land" it'll be a building sight as far as the eye can see. And we all know who'll be getting this housing with over a million and counting coming into the UK every year. How about Labour ask the British public if they want this unrestricted, unsustainable, destructive mass migration? I THINK ITS ABOUT TIME WE WERE ASKED!
You can't keep building without an infrastructure and investment by the state. What about non-privatized, accessible, decent schools, shops, surgeries, community facilities and transport - all these things are simply ignored as we can see in the past and present. Where's the available money for ordinary citizens if they're to live in such places. There are no decent jobs with decent sustainable conditions. It takes a lot of money to live somewhere without accessible public facilities. New build generally offers none of these things - they're simply spaces for the well off. There's simply no thoughtful, logical or humane intent. The end result is simply more roads, more traffic, more poverty, more destruction of the environment, more pollution, more anger. The public are being squeezed and squeezed until there's nothing left.
This should be obvious. I'm a LP member. Letting the market rip is simply classic neoliberalism....build, build, build for more profit.
Sunak let in 2.5 million. The economic growth promised by these floods of foreigners never materialized, and now we need to house them somewhere.
They are living very well on our tax money stop te welfare state
In France would be good as they get a tent there.
Getting building boosted by tearing up the rulebook is not a wise move. The rules are there to stop inappropriate mass construction. And it is unacceptable that areas officially designated green field is simply used to boost the cost of building on it anyway. While some short term building to alleviate pressure is necessary, it is putting a plaster on the symptoms when one needs to fix the cause, which clearly is the population boom and the reasons for it.
well said
Francis is the worst type of person
Francis a country 😂
Serial killers are worse.
@@ape72patch1 wtf r u on? France is a country, Francis is a name. And that rich selfish women is called Francis. 🤤
Frances' real name is Karen.
@@ribz747the whole country or you mean Francis ? 😂
They are going to have to put all the immigrants and prospective labour voters somewhere. Have they mentioned services for all these people they are going to import. I doubt it. Perhaps politicians should address the question of over population,
Labour may hope that but I'm guessing going forward that sectarianism via Islam will rise, not Labours votes
Housing for who? We need to understand and accept that we CANNOT simply build our way out of this - its impossible! The very idea that we should even attempt to house millions of people moving from other parts of the globe to this small island (let alone the required infrastructure) is absolutely ridiculous.
Ok lets just become an extremely poor country instead then
@@TedThomasTT Or you know we could cut immigration to essential immigrants and build housing. The mistake of mass immigration is done we have to stop it and make the best of it now.
Housing should go to those that need it most. Just because you were born in this geographic area does not entitle you to special treatment.
@@TedThomasTT Have you been outside lately, we already are.
@@balthus9105 things can always get worse...
I've been in my town for 15 years and over that time there have been tens of thousands of houses and flats built.
We need infrastructure first
Back in the day when new housing estates were built, there was always shops, doctors, dentist, schools, bank, post office etc. It's what helps make a community thrive.
@@boota1979
There have been several huge estates built around my town.
There are two presently being built within a stone's throw of my house. One of 500+ houses, the other if 1000+...... absolutely no mention of schools, doctor's surgeries, dentists, etc. not to mention the impact of all those new houses flushing sewage into the existing infrastructure.
@@apemoon1731 It's the same where I live, it's utterly ridiculous!
@@boota1979 it is the same in every single city in the entire country already
Same where I live. Since mid 1980's they've never stopped building & still are. 🤬
People go on about the concrete council monstrosities, but the quality of so many of these new builds are absolutely dire, not just aesthetically but in terms of the actual construction, sprawl, workmanship and literal structural stability. The whole construction industry has been incentivised over decades to be as cost-cutting and negligent as possible, and skills have degraded with it. I really hope Labour doesn't call on these same cowboy corporate developers. I would prefer state built housing, but if they really are allergic to it, I hope at the very least they form new public/private investment vehicles with sig/maj public stakes, rigorous procurement, negotiations, local apprenticeships, warranties, and muscular legal enforcement of duties. The profits would not be as eye-watering as before, but as long as there is some profit (which housing will always provide given the particularly high/captured demand), there will always be people that want to invest, as long as it's stable and thought through (which in itself would also encourage more long-term/thoughtful investors).
Also help-to-buy has been an absolute disaster for mega-inflated house-prices/mortgages and creating a stratified/captive market for the overpriced shoddy new builds. It needs to be scrapped, or totally reworked
I remember the days when local councils did all their own housing, new builds and maintenance, and they took on apprentices of all trades. The private sector builders have been filling their boots. Don't forget the Tory PFI which Labour took to a whole new level. Both as bad as each other, and rotten to the core. Money talks down to politics and down to both main parties.
'buy to rent' was a very bad idea.
Indeed, I wouldn't swap my humble but venerable 1970s one bed flat for a new build death trap. They're diabolical polished turds.
Let's face it- she won't be living anywhere near all the issues that she is proposing to fix! She won't be living near to large housing estates, won't be living in inner city Ghetto's, wont be living in the poor areas of the country- she will just make sure that more of these estates are built for the poorer of us. A NIMBY.. building for the poorer of us...Not In My Back Yard.. but we can live there if we can afford it...
They won't be able to escape the crime though. They can hire private security but a time will come when it's too dangerous a job. Like the police are getting scared now.
she lived in kirkstall in Leeds plenty close enough to poor inner city areas and I assume now she's in 11 downing street she'll be touring the country often
What is this madness... a politician actually answering questions. Well I'll be. Its been a while.
Same old waffle, BS and lies with any real content.
Didn’t see Jonathan Ashworth 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Absolute cobblers.
We have massive building where I live.
No-ones standard of living has improved.
Public services have got worse - no new surgeries/bus routes/leisure facilities so more people using the same services.
More houses does not naturally = better life.
But said in a convincing way fools the fools.
But it is better for migrants from 3rd world countries.
Don't forget the Greenbelt was never about saving the environment. It was about constricting cities so they don't sprawl outwards. Well, if you lock cities into a small area and give no new land for construction of new homes, what did you think would happen to housing availability?
Cool.
The environment goes out the window because people don't want to have the conversation about immigration.
Yeah that and millions of people turning up of course
More low density sprawl will just lead to more car dependence.
@@lazrseagull54 perfect for helping bolster and justify the electric vehicle infrastructure then woo
Control the borders...that will help
U can not whinge about a housing crisis and then also whinge about home building!! More affordable accommodation is desperately need all over the country!!
No housing crisis...uncontrolled and unplanned population explosion. Close the borders and deport..problem solved
For a few more years then we back at square one.
2 million migrants in 2 years like to see this government build a million homes in a year....ask the question...why aren't our homeless put in these hotels where the ILLEGAL immigrants are housed.....scandoulous
Building for who. Where us the money coming from?
The first issue is to deal with migrants and their deportation.
We wouldn’t have had to build so many houses on the countryside if the population hadn’t expanded so much in the last 20 years due to immigration.
it should be council homes with UK citizens prioritised.
What a preposterous statement. Anyone should be entitled to housing as long as they're paying taxes.
@@darkeye306. UK citizens first priority,
Labour always put foreigners first.
Labour never pioritsed UK citizens or England
@@darkeye306 Paying taxes should not be a prerequisite for owning or living in a property. It is a human right, we have people fleeing wars, are you suggesting they pay taxes?
Concrete ghettos on the way, utter madness
It really doesn't matter how many houses we build. If net migration stays at 750k or more, it'll literally be impossible to supply that many houses.
Hello reader. The tories have played a long lie on the public. GREEN belt and BROWN belt land was held back to artificially increase the price of property. It has worked but typical tory greed its gone too far. If 1.5 million homes are built with many council it will lower the cost of the average home. Lets see how much fight Labour put in to this.
So what you're saying is socialism has destroyed the economy with government regulations and other socialist policies? , let's not forget it was the socialists in the 60s that made sure new development had to run a gauntlet of red tape
We have Thatcher to thank for removing all rent controls and allowing builders a free for all on house prices and charging what their greedy hearts desire.
Half the proceeds of the sales were paid to the local authorities, but the government restricted authorities' use of most of the money to reducing their debt until it was cleared rather than spending it on building more homes.
The Treasury has made £47bn from Right to Buy and done what with it precisely?
Don't be so idiotic, the Green Belt is there to protect against urban sprawl and to protect the environment.
We will need more houses than this! We have floods of immigrants coming.
If the housing collapses everything follows including the banks it's the BOE's job to artificially increase the price of properties because they are the major way to create money that is why raising the interest rate affects mortgages more than any others, this is how the system works and Labour are no different they can't afford to lower the prices or stop them from raising, Also mortgages keep the slaves at their jobs for a long time
With a declining indigenous population who is all this expense for? Their next round of imported voters I think.
Shame they vote for themselves and not Labour!
@@davidreed9671 Either way...were screwed!
Labour has just given the illegal immigrants who arrived in small boats the right to apply for asylum. Its just like having the UCL student union in government.
I like the way none of them address the root cause of the problem. Why do we have a 'housing crisis'? Why is our infrastructure not able to cope? Why is there not enough of this and not enough of that? Hmmm, couldn't be the fact that over 2.5 million people net have been let into this country over the last 2 years? And what will Labour do about that? Just carry on making it worse - that's what!
Clueless comes to mind.
If we sent all the immigrants back that come off the boats, we would not be in this problem, building houses
Building more houses to house immigrants? NO
So when you have built all these houses how will we grow food. Ha in window boxes. And will these houses be for the indigenous people or for immigrants.
NO, to house the million of British people on council waiting lists and temporary accommodation all over the country
@@stonale736 so how do we grow food to sustain these people, and when here does that mean there families can come over for us to keep while our people have no home and are living on the streets. These people are coming here illegally what is it you don’t seam to understand. If any Brit just went to another Country with no visa they would turn you around and put you on the first plane or boat out of the Country-its obvious this hasn’t sunk in yet so when will this happen (Any time soon, or what). We are full to the brim as it is and people who work are paying the very high price for something they don’t want. SORT IT!!!!!!!.,!!!!!!!!!!
In just 3 days Labour has taken the country further in the right direction than the Tories managed to do in 14 years.
I totally agree! It’s sad though that this is worthy of comment. We pay their wages! This should have been the norm
Watch your kids!! Mark these words illegals will have them
@@user-ol6rd7pl5t with words.......Boris 'promised' 40 new hospitals.
This is the same.
Wouldn't be necessary if we hadnt imported millions of people
@mrmeldrew693 well said no talk about ridiculous energy prices we are facing just speech
Labour, Tory it doesn't matter. The UK is on an inescapable downward spiral, heading in the same direction as Italy, also once a proudly successful nation. Now they're just content with saying the country works, more or less.
What are they going to do about our unwelcome visitors who are destroying the future of our kids
They are going to give them homes and benefits.
They will become leagal uk citizens given a house and even more benefits at the cost of the tax payer all whilst the tax payer gets nothing
I do not think we should hold our breath when we are promised a massive house building program. The last thing builders want is an over supply of houses . Think back 30 years when we had a glut of apartments for sale in Birmingham, shock horror prices had to be lowered.
That speech feel like a promising breath of fresh air, as a previous comment mentioned. That guy not only speak fluently but convincingly, that is the kind of leaders we need. Bless him.🙏🏽
🤮
Why don’t they use old buildings? Refurbish all of them? There are loads in London are empty standing doing nothing. Refer them tournament into apartments flats whatever that will save loads of money and it’s better for the environment not to keep pulling buildings down.
The whole country is in need of more housing, in particular more affordable ones.
Many London homes foreign owned and empty for 90% if year
Most new builds in cardiff are taken by gimmegrants fact
Got to make homes for our new neighbours, UK , The gift that keeps giving
Great speech.
Much more professional than we’ve seen for a long, long time.
If you like daleks
Now all they have to do is show the brilliant results before the next election.
I think they should always be sure the percentage of Social Housing, in any development is adhered to. That was the rule with the last Labour Govrnment. The Torys let that rule slip, the developers convinced them not to!
@@TimComley got anything intelligent to say?
@@neilpike6758 they’re starting, and there’s 5 years left.
I hope you’re taking notes. 👍🏻
Density is more important than space. The big problem in the UK is a phobia of building up. Furthermore, social housing needs to be commissioned by government
New housing is already tiny and on top of each other.
Not where I live... We've had so many high-rise esthetically depressing communist Eastern Europe style drab buildings put up, Commie filth are well engrained. Other houses for sale are being advertised in China !!
No, thanks. Just stop letting in million a year; that would be easier and greener. We know now that it is bringing down GDP per capita. As for the economy, Labour wanted more of the madness, as seen in Wales; we would still be locked down now.
“I’m not a NIMBY” says the NIMBY.
WEFPUPPETS
No more small boats coming here. Stammer will have them coming here via P&O remember this is what labour supporters wanted
No she won't, the labour party will achieve what it always achieves, absolutely nothing and the UK public will pay for it as usual
Building on green fields is a bad move more green fields building is less food for everyone
I‘m sure half the supportive comments here would have criticised the Tories if they would have proposed building on the old airfields 😂
Hypocrisy is the only thing guaranteed here.
Yes I would they have allowed the import of millions of people without whom we wouldn't need to build anywhere near as many
"We're definitely not full. We definitely don't have too many people here. We need to save the environment, we're polluting too much. We need to build millions of new homes because there aren't enough homes for people, but we're definitely not full, even though we literally don't have enough homes for people. Also we need to save the environment, but we need to pave over the environment. We need to not have so many cars, but we need to have more roads to connect more homes and have more people commuting and have more cars, because we're definitely not full and we're going to save the environment with more cars and roads."
We really have entered an Orwellian realm of doublethink haven't we?
Love this reply you forgot to add with our use of technology Google has significantly increase its carbon footprint 5 mins on the internet uses more carbon the travelling 1 km in a car yet you never here this mentioned
Retrofitting 25,000,000 homes and building another 1,500,000 😂
Five days in and Labour are showing thst they are an utter disaster
Reeves , all of your group looks more like a UK controller.
Build more houses > Bring in more immigrants > Build more houses > Bring in more immigrants > Build more houses > Bring in more immigrants > Build more houses > Bring in more immigrants. 🌹
Correct
You are clown 🤡🤡🤦🏻♀️
and where is she going to build these new slums ?? not near her i bet ?
She has always had her head in the clouds
The building of new houses she's referring to is not for British citizens but to house migrants
no it's not
says every racist
@@user-zs6mt2fl3l really?? And how long have you been housing minister??
yes it does
Builders are currently going broke from high rates materials and labour. in its latest quarterly Red Flag Alert - issued today (22 January) - the insolvency practitioner added that 83,332 construction companies were in “significant financial distress”. Now they are being asked to build for cheaper? Good luck
I`m sure builders love building houses for free. Why don`t Labour ask the nurses to work for free?
8:10 - Property developer clearly lying about welcoming the decrease in value of things they sell and then saying they’ll crash the policy in their own interest. Not fooled.
The finances of the country were just as fucked when the Conservative Party took over 14 years ago and will still be the same when labour are voted out in five years time
Look at the facts in the public domain. Even with a global crisis Labour paid down the natuonal debt and left less debt than they inherited. In the last 14 years its tripled to an all time high and yet public services are in ruins
A lot debt came with Corvit. People claimed money through fraud and the people in charge did not checked the claims. But their housing building will be for the boats people and not our people Hopefully the green belts will not dissarpear because we nerd them for climate.
@@ragdollkid1338 What was the global crisis ?
The global financial crisis.
A lot of the wealth/tax spent by Labour turned out to be 'fools gold". Whoever won the 2010 election was going to have to make reductions in public spending.
The cuts made by the coalition were larger than necessary because of the increase in the foreign aid budget. This budget was increased due to the Labour Party putting political pressure on the Tories.
To deal with the pandemic the Government borrowed 400 billion.
To deal with the consequences of Russias invasion of Ukraine the Government borrowed 100 billion.
The higher interest rates we now have is costing the Government billions every year.
Deficit today is £121B...2010...it was £160B.
There are plenty of empty shops and other buildings in the cities that could now be repurposed. Get people living in towns and the businesses around them will thrive. Unfortunately that isn’t as profitable as building on green belt or farmland.
It seems crazy to me to build houses in areas where services are vastly overstretched and cannot meet the demand. In a very small town in the SW the council have been given permission to build 400 houses where there is a tiny high street, one DR’s surgery, one primary school and little parking. Why don’t they address these issues first?
Rachel Reeves and the Labour Party - absolutely clueless.
Words what are words
I've lost any hope of a future, immigration is just gonna keep increasing year after year until there's there's simply not enough tax payers to pay all the benefits and houses run out.
If Labour are allowing 100,000 illegal immigrants asylum to clear the backlog the. We can assume they will be top of the list for housing, just like now. Without vetting them and proper processing, how many do you think could be criminals, drug dealers, murderers, rapists, etc. how many do you think will be engineers, doctors , surgeons, qualified tradesmen etc. ?
Why do we need to build so many new houses? The TFR in the U.K. is 1.5? We don’t even replace our selfs so why do we need 1.5 million new homes?
5 years hard LABOUR.
10 years also can
Yes please
25 years please.
In perpetuity please. Fed up with Labour building things up, only for the Tories to kick it all down.
@@mup_petyou realise it’s normally the other way round right?
My old boss used to tell me when I was a young man, "To reignite the economy the Government just need to build more houses, roads etc". BTW, he wasn't a Labour fanboy.
It's obvious to everyone but that doesn't translate into action.
Did he mention the population explosion and where an island can find more land (in the sky?)
Worked at the end of WW2
@@ebnanaann5644they can reduce the numbers of visas they allow to reduce immigration
Where is the money coming from?
We will all be paying more tax, it’s the big topic Starmer always avoided running up to the election
What? They're not going to spend any money.
We only im port 75% of our food, I’m sure building over what is left of our farm land to house new arrivals will end well.
😅😅😅 If Westminster City Council are knee deep in housing policy you lot are in far more trouble than you realise.
Probably should start with building reservoirs and water treatment facilities. Most summers the UK has hose pipe bans because the current stock of reservoirs are enough and global warming will make that worse, population growth will also make that worse.
But then again the water sector have been privatized for many years, so they can either nationalize it again, or use billions of pounds of tax payers money to build reservoirs in order for private businesses to make profit from.
It's funny that Britain is a small island with massive amounts of rain but not enough water coming out of peoples taps, so that the entire country has hosepipe bans.
Now we out of EU we can get rid of their laws, like the postal directive for example, that make these businesses unaffordable for a goverment to hold. Labour wont do that.
@@jamesart6568 your reply has absolutely nothing to do with what your replying to.
The country doesn't all have hosepipe bans on some areas. Our supply company STW has not had a hose ban for years and created Carsington Water a few years ago to increase supply. If the Govt, as owners of the water companies in 1970 had created a national grid of water as promised by Dennis Howell, the drought minister in 1976 after that hot summer then we probably wouldn't have a problem.
Interestingly, UK has as much rainfall per head of population as Saudi Arabia.
@@matthewbaynham6286 Yes it does, You did mention"renationalizing" so yes it has to do with that, To "Renationalize" we got to get rid of those EU laws that make it easy for corporations to profit from.
@@jamesart6568 sounds like some nonsense that any brexit nutter would go on about. Has it been fact checked by anyone credible?
More & more houses……enter millions & millions of uninvited guests….. what could possibly go wrong… 🤔
Bring in a million a year, what could possibly go wrong!
Liebour: the clue's in the name.
Agreed 💯
Christ. They’ve had their decades. Defeat the NIMBYS.
Build a house on top of you.
We currently im port 75% of our food, year zero lib real thinking.
It might not be Nimbys that defeat them, it may be a shortage of building tradesmen.
Get them all in the south and leave the north untouched and glorious...😂😂
One day you too may be a NIMBY ! I brought the land to control my immediate environment.
Building for immigration so get your cardboard box really for your kids.
We're doomed.
88% of the country didn’t vote for labour
An even greater percentage didn't vote for any of the parties either. How does this help ?
wait til she finds out that planning is devolved or does Britain only mean England..................
Labours plans are to remove any local govt decisions, everything will be Centralised as in Communist Fascism .
It's not just about building more houses -it must be done in tandem with expanding our existing infrastructure to cope with the increased demands on our sewerage systems, water supply and electricity supply. Builders have no interest in helping to pay for this. This and other problems are all a symptom of an unmanageable influx of foreigners in such high numbers that our society is being overwhelmed. Just shoving up more housing makes it look like government is doing something but in reality, they are solving nothing and only making a bad situation worse by not stopping the boats and giving preference to these invaders over our own citizens. Don't expect any Labour policies to improve the lives of ordinary British people.
Lots of new houses but no provision for sewage treatment bus routes schools doctors surgery! You need a minister of commons sence
Population density of England is 426 square km, population density of France is 118 square km, that is the real problem not ruining the environment.
Im pleased my house with over 2 acres.
there are plenty countries which are more dense than the UK. The space is just used inefficiently
Japan has a higher population density than the UK and more difficult land to build on yet they manage. It's not really an excuse.
@@MA-jz4ycoh yeah they're doing great with their generational mortgages and a disaffected youth that's given up breeding.
People don't live spread out like that. Even france towns and cities are around 5,000 perspns per square km same as the UK and most of Europe
The NIMBYs aren’t going to accept the manifesto promise. Such people agree things need to be built, not just near them.
Many new Labour MP's represent marginal constituencies that won't be happy if it effects them.
Most of the NIMBY lot are Reform or Tory voters and are not going to be able to stop this now. Good - for too long they have blocked development and onshore wind.
What a sick joke no build schools, hospitals etc how it’s that work & it’s won’t happened .!!!!
How environmentally friendly.
Build millions of houses for millions of migrants to live in, but build nowhere for those millions to work.
Excellent plan...not.
That's exactly who they are for.
Those migrants you talk of are doing the hard jobs - fruit pickers, cleaners, hospitality etc - that British people won't do because they think they are above those jobs.
@@metlinematt Brits don't think they are above those jobs, locals just don't want to toil for 50 pence and hour to be evicted out of un affordable homes, travel, bills, cost of living
None of those jobs are hard. More like hardly pay
@@metlinemattI see you are in favour undermining of the working class with v cheap labour