A Conceptual Approach to Controllability and Observability | State Space, Part 3

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 дек 2024

Комментарии • 77

  • @BrianBDouglas
    @BrianBDouglas 5 лет назад +159

    Hey everyone, thanks for watching this video! If you have any questions or comments that you'd like me to see, please leave them under this comment so that I get notified and can respond. Cheers!

    • @prashantajabe2693
      @prashantajabe2693 5 лет назад +2

      Make video on the how to interpret sensor data.

    • @benallia8262
      @benallia8262 5 лет назад +3

      exactly what i asked! thank you brian :D

    • @gosayeweldemaryam2415
      @gosayeweldemaryam2415 5 лет назад +2

      Hi brian
      I'm from ethiopia. Your videos are exceptional. I'm truly satisfied. I thank you. My question is that can you do such videos on linear quadratic regulator (LQR)?

    • @BrianBDouglas
      @BrianBDouglas 5 лет назад

      @@benallia8262 Glad to hear it!

    • @BrianBDouglas
      @BrianBDouglas 5 лет назад +2

      @@gosayeweldemaryam2415 I'm finishing up a video on LQR right now! Should post next week.

  • @kaipn9763
    @kaipn9763 5 лет назад +193

    You and Steve Brunton are 2 gems of control systems.!

    • @ramisketcher2069
      @ramisketcher2069 5 лет назад +2

      Indeed! ;)

    • @triagung2497
      @triagung2497 4 года назад

      I couldn't agree more!

    • @turbotoblast4
      @turbotoblast4 3 года назад

      As true as it gets.

    • @oldcowbb
      @oldcowbb 3 года назад +3

      i just realize both of them are from Seattle

    • @jagadishkumarmr1067
      @jagadishkumarmr1067 Год назад +3

      I would say Katkim show and Christopher Lum(especially for aerospace) are can be added to the list..!
      Its just amazing that anyone can learn anything over the internet!

  • @HerChip
    @HerChip 4 года назад +9

    Such a practical example (the beam) at the end makes things so much more logic (unobservable modes) than I learned in class

  • @victorthepaduani
    @victorthepaduani 5 лет назад +6

    This deserves 100K+ views. Good job, Brian. Stay productive!

  • @wiloberlies9598
    @wiloberlies9598 5 лет назад +10

    Really nice job Brian, you're right to be proud of this one...excellent explanation with well-chosen examples. Thank you for this!

  • @divyanshsati1116
    @divyanshsati1116 3 года назад +1

    God bless you Brian, finally could understand the intuition behind all that math!

  • @ashkabrawn
    @ashkabrawn 4 года назад +2

    Omg... I just came here after watching Steve's series !! Thanks for the pointers

  • @Daniboy370
    @Daniboy370 2 года назад

    Probably the most useful video I happen to come across

  • @daouadiwalid5491
    @daouadiwalid5491 9 месяцев назад

    That car driving example hits hard ... Brian shows that perfect examples could exists!

  • @thegent5167
    @thegent5167 2 года назад +1

    This is a fantastic explaination of the topic and gave me a better and clearer view of controllability and observability. Thanks a lot!

  • @shuvodev3708
    @shuvodev3708 10 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you Brian

  • @patrickayivor2406
    @patrickayivor2406 4 года назад +1

    Simple explanation with powerful examples

  • @spectra5024
    @spectra5024 Год назад

    Your videos are art, thanks dude!

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 5 лет назад +7

    Controllability is dual to Observability
    Poles (eigenvalues) are dual to Zeroes
    The Initial value theorem IVT is dual to the Final value theorem FVT
    Stability is dual to instability
    Robustness is dual to performance
    Complex numbers are dual to real numbers
    In physics equivalence, similarity is also known as duality, so we have the the following duals (Jewels):-
    Energy is equivalent or dual to mass -- Einstein
    Gravitation is dual to acceleration --- Einstein
    Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy
    Space is dual to time -- Einstein
    Certainty is dual to uncertainty, the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle
    Energy is literally duality. Energy is transported by the electromagnetic field in the form of photons or wave/particles, quantum duality. Energy is inherently dual. In physics everything is made out of energy hence duality.
    If energy is conserved and energy is duality then duality must be conserved! The conservation of duality is the fifth law of thermodynamics.
    Negative curvature is dual to positive curvature (Riemann, Gauss)
    Hyperbolic geometry is dual to elliptic, spherical geometry
    A white hole (big bang, divergence) is dual to an infinite mass black hole (convergence)
    In mathematics: Integration is dual to differentiation
    Duality creates reality, all observers are inherently dual if they are made out of energy
    Genes are dual to memes
    Everything (all things) is/are dual to nothing.

    • @ashkabrawn
      @ashkabrawn 4 года назад

      Did you just cover Heisenberg in more ways than he himself pictured.. 😉😅

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 4 года назад

      @@ashkabrawn Dark energy is dual to dark matter!
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis -- the generalized or time independent Hegelian dialectic.
      Hegel's cat: Alive (thesis, being) is dual to not alive (anti-thesis, non being) -- Schrodinger's cat.
      Immanuel Kant: Synthetic a priori knowledge, all knowledge is dual.
      Philosophy, physics, mathematics, control theory all lead to duality!
      "Philosophy is dead" -- Stephen Hawking.
      It looks like Mr Hawking got this one wrong! No philosophy = no duality.

    • @ashkabrawn
      @ashkabrawn 4 года назад

      @@hyperduality2838 what is the duality for universe, biverse and multiverse ?

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 4 года назад +1

      @@ashkabrawn The future is dual to the past. Many worlds (possibilities) or the multiverse would be the future and the one world or universe (reality) is the past. The present or the 'now' is therefore the duality or the biverse.
      The future meets or intersects the past in the present via duality!
      Noumenal (before measurement, a priori) is dual to phenomenal (after measurement, a posteriori).
      Deduction (rational) is dual to induction (empirical) -- Immanuel Kant.
      Positive is dual to negative.
      Duality converts possible worlds into the real world or probability = 1.
      Time is dual:- My absolute time is your relative time and your absolute time is my relative time.
      Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein).

    • @ravikiran4495
      @ravikiran4495 9 месяцев назад

      so ying and yang

  • @dallasdominguez9501
    @dallasdominguez9501 2 года назад

    Another Brian Douglas Hood Classic👌

  • @mpja
    @mpja 5 лет назад +2

    This definitely helps the intuition. Good video!

  • @AhmedMagdy-xb8bl
    @AhmedMagdy-xb8bl 4 месяца назад

    Man you are awesome.
    Thank you very much.

  • @yinarodriguez6672
    @yinarodriguez6672 3 года назад

    Nice to find Brian here!

  • @demisbooo743
    @demisbooo743 2 года назад

    Great explanation! Thank you so much!

  • @mukuljobra3972
    @mukuljobra3972 2 года назад

    Hey! I have watched your lectures on your RUclips channel and it is good to see you here again on this MATLAB channel.
    Great explanation...nice work...Sir 😊

  • @pravinpalve3771
    @pravinpalve3771 4 месяца назад

    why this video does not have million likes?

  • @johnfrobin
    @johnfrobin 4 года назад

    Excellent video. Thank you.

  • @blitz8229
    @blitz8229 3 года назад

    Thank you for this video!

  • @jairguilhermecertorio6362
    @jairguilhermecertorio6362 4 года назад +1

    Your definition of controllability is actually reachability, in continuous systems they are equivalent but for discrete systems they are not. To be reachable the system must be able to go from your initial state to any other state, to be controllable the system must be able to go from any initial state to zero. In discrete systems it is easy to see that a A = [0 0; 0 0] would be controllable (gets to zero from any point in one sampling without depending on B), but it would only be reachable if B = [1 0; 0 1] (individually control each state). Great video nonetheless.

  • @pedrobenevenutovaladares9734
    @pedrobenevenutovaladares9734 4 года назад

    Fantastic video !

  • @learningexploring5717
    @learningexploring5717 3 года назад

    Thank you for sharing :)

  • @manerlind
    @manerlind 2 года назад

    Это просто превосходно!

  • @thelegendkilleragab
    @thelegendkilleragab 5 лет назад +1

    Hello Brian, can you please make a lecture about stabilizability and detectability? those are very confusing terms. Thank you

  • @shmoodiee6173
    @shmoodiee6173 5 лет назад

    Amazing stuff

  • @qamarkilani551
    @qamarkilani551 5 лет назад +2

    Hi Brian
    Many Thanks for your great videos , do you have notes/slides that can be shared in pdf format ?

  • @vivekmech1
    @vivekmech1 5 лет назад +3

    Hi Brian , awesome work!
    May I know which software you use for this illustrations?
    Thanks

  • @eatctitox
    @eatctitox 5 лет назад +3

    Love your videos! Can you please explain why is the D matrix usually regarded as zero in college courses?

    • @samchan5251
      @samchan5251 5 лет назад +7

      To my understanding. D matrix is the direct feed through term, the input will change your measurement (y) directly, not through the system evolution (Ax). And this type of system is rare (never see and cannot think of one). Note that if D is non-zero, the transfer function will not be strictly proper. Another reason maybe, because the maths is the same with or without D being zero, college courses usually design to be easy to understand and illustrate the key concept.

    • @samchan5251
      @samchan5251 5 лет назад +2

      Just something came up in my mind. If you are discretizating a continuous time system, it is likely that the resulting discrete system (Ad,Bd, Cd,Dd) Dd is non-zero. I think there is a paper talks about discretization will introduce something call "sampling zeros". Even the continuous model is strictly proper, the discretized system will not be.

  • @MarcusViniciusMO
    @MarcusViniciusMO 2 года назад

    Using reconstructed velocity, by position diferentiation, and these same positions as output can bring more information to estimate other states?

  • @PlayboyHZ
    @PlayboyHZ 4 года назад

    Would have been nice of some demonstrations in matlab/simulink, just like part 2

  • @blessoneasovarghese9834
    @blessoneasovarghese9834 4 года назад

    Could you please tell me why will C-matrix be zero when states are not measurable. Also what could be the output y in the examples of train and car? What role do output y and C-matrix play in observability, conceptually?

  • @vineetverma6645
    @vineetverma6645 5 лет назад +1

    When we judge people from outside based on their color or financial status, we are observing only a handful of states, and thus we end up fooling ourselves

  • @zeeshangla
    @zeeshangla 5 лет назад +1

    Hey! good Job Sir,
    Hello All.... Is there any specialized Power system course using SIMULINK

  • @tushermyth
    @tushermyth 4 года назад

    wow!

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 5 лет назад

    Correction to my earlier mistake:-
    A white hole (big bang, divergence) is dual to an infinite mass black hole (convergence)
    Dark energy is literally hyperbolic geometry or negative curvature
    Positive is dual to the negative.

  • @achmadfatoni2555
    @achmadfatoni2555 4 года назад

    Bnhihhhh

  • @abdelz1617
    @abdelz1617 Год назад

    Great video!