Lawrence Krauss: Hidden Realities - The Greatest Story Ever Told... So Far (at Conway Hall)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 дек 2016
- To find out more about Conway Hall and its events, to become a member or to donate: conwayhall.org.uk • Please subscribe to our channel, too.
--
The Conway Memorial Lecture 2016 with Lawrence Krauss. Chaired by A. C. Grayling.
This is how the story of the greatest intellectual adventure in history should be introduced - how humanity reached its current understanding of the universe, one that is far removed from the realm of everyday experience. Krauss connects the world we know with the invisible world all around us, which is removed from intuition and direct sensation. He explains our current understanding of nature and the struggle to construct the greatest theoretical edifice ever assembled, the Standard Model of Particle Physics -- and then to understand its implications for our existence.
[This talk was filmed at Conway Hall, London, in 2016]
--
Conway Hall hosts a wide variety of talks, concerts, exhibitions, courses, performances, community and social events. It is also renowned as a hub for free speech and independent thought, hosting suffragettes, political radicals, scientists, philosophers, artists, performers; campaign, charities and other non-profit organisations.
Who knew that i would be living in the time of new physics Titans and that i would be able to grasp history while its in the making. Real progress observable in our lifetime!
The MORE I come to KNOW, The MORE I come to KNOW I "REALLY DONT"KNOW.
@Hector Lian Such a healthy person.. keep it up.
It is the worst of times, politics are part of our daily lives. I am glad intelligent people are discussing it.
I wonder what a world without politics would look like.
It has happened countless times in history. In between civilizations...
@Vasian Vasianich Because politics aren´t the way of peace.
Look around you today. All dictators......
Complete chaos
Not so mundane for sure!
Lawrence Krauss makes me cry of joy for the knowledge and the advancements in science in our life time. This conference is so good that everybody should watch it. He has the ability to make you understand the most difficult theories. Thank so much Lawrence.
Lol he's mainly just regurgitating what's on wikipedia.
when asked what its like being the smartest person on earth Einstein replied "I don't know ask Mr. Tesla"
A real crime that the Banksters destroyed him financially and sold his Legacy.....Crimes against Humanity are Countless,,,"DELETE THE ELITE! OFF WITH THERE HEADS FRENCH STYLE....😮
He may have just been being snide. Tesla had very openly criticized Einstein's theories.
What role does cold dark plasma have relative to the dark matter, dark energy theory? It is getting imaged now. Electric universe theory seems well after this. SAFIRE project experiments now show fusion and transmutation of all elements, as of 2019, at low power experiments.
@@tmst2199 Well then Einstein got the last laugh. Even if it was posthumously.
@@Amberscion He got to laugh every day that Tesla, the greatest inventor of modern times, was relegated to feeding pigeons in the park and living off welfare.
Imagine somebody didn’t torch the Library of Alexandria and we get something more than just Plato
Ruewttyeereequeiorwtwueriwqytttwoqttur at oq ttowwryw rettytuetpwtottuetwiturowttwrwtwottyttetyytuqwtqyttrottoeyweiptwetuo ty truer tyuitetteiwyoywrwqtttwerwtteyirptqteuttttrrtttttt weku out trot ty tyoytttottr up yetpuuwrwettupwywtitttwutrtyit ttour
They torched to library but it was very little if anything important in there. The info is still around you have to understand the wicked people who stole the info. I tell you this they will never give Ancient Egypt it's credit because the people was their complete opposite and still is to this day. Ever wonder why slavery was so accepted because the world was waiting for the downfall of those people.
Imagine they stole the library
@@interstateneek nobody knows anything for sure
@@beavinator420 I suspect that was by design. Who would believe the great Persian King Darius built a suez predecessor via a canal to the Nile around 500BC? It seems much of ancient history is dark more by design than anything else and the would be purveyors of light are still infants rediscovering science our ancestors once mastered.
Lawrence Krauss is just over the top with his discussion talks, and I wish he did more of them.
The hidden reality theory is one the most interesting idea that has ever existed and I think will ever exist. This is because in hidden reality every thing is possible simply because no one has information to conclude on yes or no. That's why the reality is hidden and so interesting.
Greatly enjoyed this lecture!
It looks like he's standing next to a big bottle of cologne.
Hahahahahaha best ever
Brilliant!
Would not be surprised if it is filled with adrenochrome as he is wearing red shoes.
He has to. He stinks.
Ha
I tried to use my own “crutches “ in math which led to me having to take remedial math
Everyone on Earth 🌏 needs to stop and watch this now. Brilliant.
Is this the guy that talks about nothing?
I was torn between this and "The Great British Bake Off"
I chose wisely.
No contest imo :)
Primus 777 what was the bake off like?
if that's so, Primus. why were you thinking of watching it?
Wow, you're smart!
I'm sure in one reality you chose wrong
Algebraic independence of variables & numbers over fields is fascinating.
Proving that no finite algebraic relations exist among a set of numbers if incredibly difficult work.
Van Gogh ( Starry Night ) made no money as an artist , but now his paintings are worth 100 million.He said he painted what he saw , but he never claimed to paint what everyone else saw.
The greatest story never told is much better.
Are you referring to the documentary on Adolf Hitler???
Brilliant? That's definitely debatable. Boring? Absolutely!
Britain is measuring itself for a coffin.
Oh you thought this was supposed to reality TV? Watch Keeping up with the Kardashians....or a replay of the Apprentice. You are on the wrong channel.
The lecture is good dont get me wrong, but if you dont know why something is why call it an accident, I'd rather just say its unknown.
can not say it unknown, you are here and also can not call it accident, we all come to ˝an end˝ accident or not - problem is you think you are not conscientous like gods and spooky ghosts, but you are and that is hope for me too, to go do what i will do in next hour
Thank you Lawrence. Beau...uuuu...tiful lecture!
Love to listen to these lectures....I'm by no means fully cognitive of everything they talk about but....They open doors to a much clearer perception of the universe on my part....Thank's!!
You mean 'on their part'
Its not a very in depth study really. He sounds more like a History of Science Professor. What he seems to miss is explaining and visualizing example. A good one is where he says we see 3D in 4D. This can be easily described by only viewing what is relative to position. You can only see 2 to 3 sides of a cube shaped building at one time, but if the mind and position wasnt bound, we would perceive the opposing view. Visual Artists have been spanning this distance since the dawn of time, which hardwires neurons. Other paths of study can build Algorithmic patterns such as Music Theory and brain teasers. Those who begin seeing what is a crossplatform of sensory input(Synesthesia) can expand these brain centers, which reveal a complexity the subconscious can expose that shows an understanding beyond our conscious interpretations. But this guy tries to pin it down mathematically and takes the spirit out.
The use of drugs enhances consciousness.. and this guy is the best example of that.....
I like listening to experts in physics and respect their expertise in the field. What I don't like listening to is when scientists believe they are experts in everything, including politics.
Fantastic Info..Thanks Foreverything 💯💞
I love the way the staunch materialist Lawrence Krauss very carefully calls it an 'accident' rather than a 'miracle'. Especially when in this case both mean the same thing. As Einstein said: Either you believe it all happened by accident or you believe it was a miracle.
or it was an "accident"
Miracles do'n't exist.
That’s not what Einstein said.
But they don't mean the same thing. Miracle implies attribution to the divine, hence why he wouldn't use that word.
It's only a miracle if you believe this universe is the first and only one. If you believe in a cyclic universe, then there has been endless iterations before us, perhaps all with slightly different physical properties. Endless iterations that for a multitude of reasons perhaps didn't exist for long or folded because the properties of mass reversed or life didn't evolve in them. We only see it as a miracle because this is the only reality we know of.
I was slowly working on creating English subtitles for this video. It seems Conway Hall disabled user contributions like that. Pity!
Over promise. Under deliver.
If i re-arrange the electrons in alpha centauri, does it break the entanglement? Cuz if not, can i not just build 2 entangled machine in large distance to each other, and change the arrangement of electrons in one and read opposite as a code.
Nobody of importance claims that entanglement changes anything. :-)
Why was Neil Tyson in the beginning, and then quickly taken down?
Emerson
I imagine he doesn't like the guy. Tyson has a rather adversarial conversation style and a strong propensity to interpret legit inquiries as a challenge or confrontation. Don't get me wrong I like Neil a lot, but all humans have their flaws and this may be one of Neil degrauss Tyson's most grating foibles.
For a theoretical physicist to say that something is impossible.......I shake my head sometimes at such irony.
I find such assertions arrogant in the extreme. And if a scientific lecture can't be made without so many political and religious slams then it can't have much to do with science. I don't find such jabs to be quite as cute as his audience. I'm not really a Trump fanboy, but history has shown that he wasn't nearly as bad as people made him out to be.
If he has good evidence or proof something is impossible...then you must accept it ..there are no married Bachelors
@@rationalsceptic7634 that would not be very scientific!! Sounds like the APPEAL TO AUTHORITY FALLACY.
But, you're right....it would have to be demonstrated.....everywhere. On every planet, on every moon....everywhere.
If what was considered an impossibility here on earth was demonstrated to be possible elsewhere in the universe.....is it still impossible?!
Theoretical physics are still governed by known laws of physics and mathematics. I don't see the problem.
@@SMPKarma
Except Quantum Indeterminacy rules out accessible underlying substratum or hidden variables for God to tweak..all we have are correlations not causation!
You set this up as the greatest and best, if this is our greatest and best, at least those that believe that premise are in trouble.
Thanks for informing me... not to bother with that book... it’s funny how I might have been interested until I actually saw this... that would not have been time well wasted! Life is short... spend it with awesome people!!
I've just ordered the shoes
Youhavetoearnthem
@@MsCookie1995 I did.. by listening to his jokes...
@@hippopotamus6765 Not what he meant by that....
@@sbeav1105 what did he mean?
@@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline ... Wow, really? You got me on that one. I would never have made that association. Thank God, you have saved me...
Krauss is hard to follow but he does bring fresh knowledge to a old subject and there is a need of his thoughts.
So if the "mistake" that created this new omnipresent field, as suggested in his "living in a superconductor" theory, is currently at a point where it cannot possibly be yet established as to whether this field will stay as it is, reduce/collapse, or grow, then surely one theory must be that it is to grow/evolve and such forces/reactions will then become the norm, rather than an exception to the rule?
Glad I read the comments before 10 minutes in.
Farewell
Does the number of dimensions have to be a rational number?
Like Harry Potter
"The universe should be grateful that we are here" sounds like a return to the beliefs that we are the centre of the universe.
consciousness IS, check Tom Campbell - ruclips.net/user/twcjr44
I don't see it that way. It's not arrogance - we're not special - we're just different because we're so curious.
The universe doesn't need us. It managed perfectly well before we showed up and won't miss us when we're gone.
Krauss's tongue-in-cheek point is that it's never nice to be taken for granted. Unlike the hydrogen, rocks, oceans, daffodils and cockroaches that the universe produced before us, humans are a species that's prepared to compliment it on its new hairstyle and ask it how it's feeling.
It's spent thousands of millions of years producing natural wonders, marvels, horrors and weird phenomena, all of which, as far as we know, have been completely ignored.
How very rude... 🤭
I'm sure the thinking behind that is just so that there is witnessing to everything happening. It's not inferring that we are special, unique, or alone, because in all likelyhood we are none of those. Just as it stands we are the only ones we know of who can document their observations of the reality we are living in.
@@Aeis_Kalt But our observations are limited. It's like saying a comedian should be grateful for a theatre filled with the most miserable people on earth.
The unexamined life might not be worth living, but is the unlived life worth examining?
@@happinesstan Some observation is better than none. Even with our limited scope of vision and interpretation, it's better than to have none of either.
Thanks so much
His illustration served to make me feel that there are perspectives and personal realities based on our individual perspectives. They’re not really an illusion as such, just a limited view of reality, a definition of reality from our own perspective. That’s why curiosity is so important for science, to get us to m wonder what’s beyond our own horizon.
“The illusion of design is an accident”
This is an atheist fantasy rather than a scientific theory. The danger of taking physics into the realm of philosophy is that we use it to create new religions every day that suit our own fantastic imagination. It tells us something about our inner desires, but sheds very little light on the true nature of reality.
The fact that matter and the universe as we know could blink put of existence in a moment should cause us to be filled with wonder that our existence is so improbable, potentially ephemeral and apparently accidental; that so much order and beauty has arisen out of apparently nothing doesn’t mean to me that life and the universe are meaningless. It means to me that they’re incredibly miraculous and that our existence is providential. It adds meaning to our existence rather than removing it.
55 minutes later... still no point😥
That actually ended up being the point...
L0L!!!
"For ALL things were created;things in heaven and on EARTH,VISIBLE and INVISIBLE....He is BEFORE ALL things,and in Him ALL things HOLD together Colossians 1:16-17
+Last 2 - when you don't have a brain, it's unlikely you'll ever get the point. Get the point?
The point is that so many of the discoveries made in the field of physics would sound like mythical stories if they were not demonstrably true. Krauss is arguing that while many people consider science to be boring, scientific explanations of the universe are actually more fascinating than the religious explanations that many of us cling to. That's his thesis anyway. The rest of the lecture serves as evidence/examples of interesting scientific discoveries throughout history that prove his thesis.
I accidentally skipped over the one slight political comment at very beginning, by moving my thumb to the start of his talk. Just an fyi for those of you who want to avoid politics: easily done, you just have to want to focus on science 👍
Exactly! Thumbs up. This guy is a fail.
A fail for having differing political views from you? It doesn't matter, it doesn't matter if they're the same views, because the rest of it is science. Humans have political views and interests no matter who they are, you may want to start getting over it and focusing on the info you came for. Or don't watch. That's an option too. Amazing thought right?
You start your first sentence bending the truth. Fascinating. Not sure if this style of clever deception is intentional or some type of subconscious conditioning.
@@KSPIRITS8 you're projecting.
@@fractaldonut-embodythrough4169 That's all you got Pham? OMG.
Finally! Someone understands the allegory of the cave.
"It's really important to understand that we're not seeing reality," says neuroscientist Patrick Cavanagh, a research professor at Dartmouth College and senior research fellow at Glendon College in Canada. "We see a story that is created for us." Further research into reality and the fundamental that is forever,permanence and existential and not that of a 3D non-existential of dimensions of time and space as proven or unproven (yet to be discovered. )
Wow - what a wonderful lecture, thank you, Dr. Krauss!
Plato? Socrates famous last words. " I drank what!?"
He drank horsecock
A forcefield that froze as it cooled down bringing corporeal matter into existence sounds pretty special to me. What do you call 'accident'? It also follows the form of thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
I'm not into politics nor polarization, but I do witness their actions and have found that they all lead this country in every personal direction which only strengthens such polarization towards eventual destruction.
if empty space has energy, it's not empty.
@The Real Slim Brady Wow, very true! Nice paragraph!
@Luxury Lowlife very well put
thank you
@Luxury Lowlife EM waves do not need a medium through which to travel. The luminiferous aether was disproven in 1887 by the Michelson-Morley experiment. If you don't understand this, how can you possibly think you understand something as complex as ZPE (which cannot be used for propulsion, as momentum requires interaction between real particles).
@The Real Slim Brady hahaha!!! "What powers the ufos"?? Hahaha!!! Your post makes zero sense and is complete horseshit. Stop trying to sound smart. You're doing it wrong....
@The Real Slim Brady Sound doesn't need air.
Amazing. Thank you professor Dr. Krauss Steve Jones
That was fascinating
Laurance Krauss is exitable, but he knows his stuff, he is exitable because of how far we have advanced in the 21st century and want's us all to realise what he can realise.
This talk is amazing. It is the best Lawrence Krauss talk that I have ever watched. Thanks for sharing it.
if you havent seen his life of physicists one, that one is very good.
Thanks for the suggestion, I will check that talk.
Please give me a summary of what he said.
He explains the development of the modern physics from Faraday, Maxwell, Einstein, to today. Even a non-physicist like me can understand.
drmysteriousx Amazing? Maybe parts. But ultimately it was illogical confused nonsense.
20.30- He implies that the velocity of EM induction in a conductor is the speed of light, it is NOT ! Even the velocity of (massless) light, passing through a transparent medium, is less then its maximum through a vaccuum.
Sad that this presentation is still on the net knowing what has been revealed about this person
About the Van Gogh painting:That is painted in a style that Van Gogh invented called expressionism. Vincent Van Gogh invented figurative expressionism.
Thank you Conway Hall...
reading these comments make me so happy knowing people are awakening
Oh...so thats what waking up means? Can't believe how dumb you folks are.
Always very informative
I always learn so much from these programs
I want a person like this to not express any political view. I so want to get away from this lack of true presence. I want information without someone trying to get me to agree with what they believe about politics. So often he is trying to express his narrow views on subjects like education and politics. Put out the information on your topics without any personal views so everyone no matter their political views or religious, life beliefs can get the full benefit and this will truly educate everyone and not just the people who agree with your life views in the so called limited reality that we live in.
Question... exactly what relative velocity must I have to make something look LONGER than 8 cm? I'm asking for a friend.
Lmao
HAHAHAHAHAAA!!!
Hahaha 🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂👍!!!
😂😂😂😂
Theoretically your shoes reflect the speed of your adoption of nonsense when confronted with dichotomies.
The answer is know thyself and all the answers within all of us which is LOVE thy neighbor as you love yourself. Then heaven on earth is manifest in all our HEARTs. Coz we are not outside of us. We are what we make in our higher self., I love you all.
Accident is a word that causes lots of grief with people that need structure in their lives. That structure causes grief to many people that are just trying to live their lives.
Well they need to be more pragmatic rather than having sensitive egos
@@velvetrest4566 No argument here. Although, I can't remember exactly in what context I meant to comment, last month. If it was religious, yes, most religious people use the word "accident" as the way things got started in an evolutionary context. Whereas, if it was how things got started in a religious context, their word would be "creation." I'm still not sure where that daydream took me.
Ok now turn it down it’s giving me a headache
I spend hours at a time listening to lectures. I love them when there's something to say...
But this. Damn. I enjoyed him on Rogan years ago.
Our existence is no accident. In Fact the universe has eligant design
Yes the comments are weird, but the video is very good.
I have a question - WHAT ARE THOSE!?
converse 1:15:52
+Dante integra Red, Convers Chuck Taylors.
Probably the most famous, or the most known shoe, of all shoes a cross the world.
It all started in Malden Massachusetts waay back at 1908. n.n
Converse - Inverse - Universe .. hee hee
MsRandomPro hell yeah... Iv had countless pairs in my life of all colours.
I heard it used to be the popes' privilege to wear red shoes.
I like spinning in those chairs too.
Even for studied people not to understand. When you imagine that you have to teach this to young kids, maybe then the adults will understand a very little bit. So for a human it is to far away. Connect your story with the narrow vision of a simple human, so that we all can understand your message.
But where does the fields come from? Say the electro-magnetic field, for simplicity. Where is it and what does it consist of and when did it start and how?
One piece of beauty in words, in fact religious people should enjoy this as well too bad the fight it. here in Europe we think this science story will and has to be the new basis for everything we do. but let's not forget our fantasy, imagination and dreams. I would argue all the philosophy spiritual theories and religions were the best game in town back then and we should not condemn those people but we do have to change the people who still believe these old theories. and with the necessary time and efforts this has to succeed.
Yet they flood their country with the most radical religion in the history of the world.
@@rd2085
They are all radical. If we lined up how many were killed by athiests, Muslims, Christians, and fake religious, it would be really long lines.
With so many critical variables having the optimum values why does Lawrence seem so convinced that we are here by accident?
RedMangon right...?
RedMangon so very annoying to hear politics mixed into this ......!!! 😡
Yeah. Wow. How could you ignorantly conclude that its an accident. Too many exact precision for it to be an accident
@@orattigan I'd like to compile a list of ALL the exactly optimal critical fine-tuning points uncovered within our reality. It's all mind-boggling to Mathematicians who know the total impossibility of even one of these being a pure happenstance. I'm sure taken together they defy any logical fantastic reach for mere probabilities - even if given infinite universes. Our universe is so precisely tuned it proves intelligent design. But we continue to ignore that solid implication while we struggle to find our way back out of the rabbit hole. But we looked in and now it's too late! Pandora's box has been opened; time to man up and get on with it. Millions of years of evolution demand us to accept and reach higher. If we accept what we are learning it will soon be evident that what we do to another we do to ourself! That knowledge proven creates a reality we truly deserve to live.
@@orattigan do you mean a vast waste except 1 teeny tiny planet where 90% of its surface is uninhabitable. Almost everything to eat is poisionous, tastes gross, and fights back, except a few food items that we design. This takes place on time scale where we as a species have existed for a fraction of a moment and it will end shortly. What percision are you talking about? That what did happen, happened. The chances of that are exactly 1.
Great video to watch if you like political nastiness where doesn't need to be. Stick to doing what you are good at Krauss.
Cleaning toilets is his best bet.
Thank you 🙏
Another great Lawrence Krauss lecture. Awesome as always.
Look at a star and know it is gone
Yes, all we ever do is live in the past, since we are (in our interactions with material life, aka the world) way slower than light.
Hello, Thank you very much for your vidéo.
Is it possible de keep observing with out jugement? As is the end of life.
As I have follow your analyses, you are Just Right to point out your expériences & your discoveries and what you have acheived so far. up to that moment.
Life, and it's wisdom carry on...
I am convinced that we are here for the raison eventhought, the majorités Still have not discover it yet.
I do believe strongly, that our paths have changed .
As we may state all kind of creziness & manipulations we are living in every période of lives.
= social engineering = robotising human family ?! How this caste will allow human family to learn some thing from thier own life expérience? !
I am sure that we are here to discover our True Nature.
I suppose every human being is Unique.
& it is simply dépend on the lèvel of conciousness & awareness.
With GRATITUDE & Recognition.
"The important stuff in the universe is not the stuff we can see, it's the stuff we can't see." Interesting metaphor for spirituality, eh?
Well I am having a hard time with the accident of existence. Science knows that tests collapse upon observation. This doesn't take into accountabout our conscious energy. Do we live in a matrix? Absolutely for me one of intelligent design.
Hi, Pamela Weir, I agree with you. For me, the most comprehensive and compelling model of consciousness which encompasses the nature of our shared reality was produced by Tom Campbell ruclips.net/user/twcjr44
@@omnigma Yes it is a test of human consciousness in freewill. I get that. That goes back to intelligent design. not accidental reality I was referring to the scientific "test" being altered by the observer doing the scientific test. Waves collapse into form upon observation. Quantum Physics.
Thank you Lawrence :) Another awesome lecture. Please come to Scotland!
the example you mention about the moving car, laser light hitting your head, and the person walking by seeing all this... I have 1 question, and maybe this sounds silly, but still...
at what speed does that person see this happening and is that included in the calculation. Furthermore, what is speed of sight or perception, is that speed of light?. this is one thing I never hear or come across from any experiments made and I cant help but think it may make a difference...??
It's already there, it depends on the observer and his perception of measurement for a description.
Spank the vacuum, spank it hard! -- Lawrence Krauss
I wonder how many people disliked and left as soon as he mentioned bringing down Trump lol
PieInTheSky many because why would you want to bring down the only option that was left instead of hillary
I agree
479 if i had to guess
@@JohnMoran I was on board, until the 5th time. I don't even like Trump, but good god.
None as it was in England and they don't care
So is it safe to say that the 1st consciousness differs from the double slit photon experiment’s observer’s consciousness because our’s is jaded with perception
It is easier for me to believe in Creator than to end up dream around like Krauss about a universe that is only an illusion.... And to believe that in the end we are product of all those illusions - what sense does it make?
Slightly more than this rambling nonsense.
As a physicist reviewing Krauss' latest "theory" put it: "Clench teeth and suck air through."
lol fab!
1:22:11 I just love it when people like this guy start drawing conclusions out of things they don't remotely understand.
"The light speed limit is just bollocks, obviously... because If two objects are on a collision course at 3/4C, then their combined speed must be 1.5C, duh..."
It exemplifies Krauss' icicle analogy/the allegory of the cavern beautifully: thick people have trouble understanding what's not immediately apparent, and they end up denying it.
This guy can only think in Newtonian terms, so he assumes that anything beyond Newtonian physics must be rubbish...because, obviously, if he can't understand something, then NOBODY can, ^^.
It must be sad for him, denying all sorts of stuff just because he can't figure them out... and I bet he still thinks he's a genius, ^^
So we are in a relativistic situation, we have two objects moving at 3/4C towards each other.
First off, we need to specify a frame of reference, we can choose between being inside one of those objects or being an external observer.
An external observer will see the two objects moving at 3/4C towards each other, so there's no mystery there, case closed.
The interesting bit comes when we enter either object's frame of reference. From that perspective, we aren't moving at all (assuming constant speed and direction), it's the rest of the world that's rushing by us at 3/4C.
Now the guy will say "and since the other object is moving 3/4C relative to the external observer, that means that it's 0.75C + 0.75C = 1.5C, duh" Well, nope. The mistake is applying Newtonian physics, just adding together V1+V2 and be done with it.
As Krauss explained, every observer has a twisted space-time perspective, dependant on position and relative speed.
Space contracts/time dilates the faster you go (according to other frames of reference), so it's not as simple as V1+V2 = PV.
It's actually more like (V1 + V2) / 1 + (V1 x V2) = Perceived Velocity (if the other object is moving towards you).
In this particular case:
V1 = 0.75C
V2 = 0.75C
So let's apply the equation and see what's the actual perceived velocity from each object's frame of reference.
(0.75 + 0.75) / 1 + (0.75 x 0.75) = 1.5 / 1.5625 = 0.96C
There you go, less than 1C.
There's more than one way of getting this kind of result, but the fundamentals are the same: space and time contract and dilate, the faster you go, so kiss Newtonian assumptions goodbye, they are only approximations that just don't work at relativistic speeds.
Now you could say that this is just a dishonest equation designed so speeds which should amount to a number greater than 1, end up giving a result smaller than 1. And I would agree with you...except for the fact that equations like this one actually work when put to the test...they actually describe how the physical world behaves, Newtonian equations, on the other hand, fail at relativistic speeds. You can actually use relativistic equations to calculate mundane speeds too, they'll give you even more accurate results than Newtonian equations.
Not Uhhh.
You might appreciate this - ruclips.net/user/twcjr44
If we know that there are things we don’t know then how can you come to the conclusion it’s all by accident?
The truth is, we don’t know and never will know. We only will make more discoveries and more speculation as time goes on.
If you disagree with "it's an accident", then what is YOUR conclusion?
some do know and all will know.......eventually
just saying - the ad before this was for a Christian dating app
Ads are targeted these days based on your personal history. Something you want to tell us?
Personal politics has no place in a science lecture.
Globalists control education. Easy to spot the anti American, anti Christian biased coming from these sellouts.
It's sad to be caught in a bubble with no exit.
To make it worse would be to say that no one gets out alive.
The most important answer you can ever get from someone is, I don't know. When you hear that answer and someone makes a decision and takes actions that are based from that information it is most generally going to be wrong beyond a dunkards walk by several orders of magnitude directly peoportional to the degree that those actions effect you. I figured this out when I was ten when I learned of my grandfather's experiences in WW1 noting that my father was drafted into WW2 wasn't 1 bad enough?
In the high desert in california areas the sky looked like that on holloween night it was very much like that. Not as blue but was very much like that.
Allrhose other particles are made up of Schrodinger's cat's dandruff
Hes on to something... theres clearly a hidden reality where his jokes are hilarious.
Your ego sounds bruised
🤣🤣🤣
The field can be seen under the right conditions
Rumour has it ..if he clicks his heels together..he'll instantly get home...