Medical emergency on board. Emergency diversion to Boston | Delta Boeing 767-400 | Boston, Real ATC
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- THIS VIDEO IS A RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING SITUATION IN FLIGHT:
25-MAY-2022. A Delta Air Lines Boeing 767-400 (B764), registration N845MH, performing flight DAL30 / DL30 from Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, GA (USA) to London Heathrow Airport (United Kingdom) being about 70 miles south of Boston at flight level 330 declared medical emergency and diverted to Boston Logan International Airport, MA (USA).
Join me on Patreon: / you_can_see_atc
PART OF TEXT VERSION OF COMMUNICATIONS THAT I'M ABLE TO INCLUDE HERE. Do you want more? Write in comments and I'll give you remaining part of text communications (Read if subtitles in video were fast):
COMMENTS: Delta 30 is at 33000 feet. In a moment the crew will contact Boston Center.
DAL30: Boston, Delta 30, at 330.
CENTER: Delta 30 Heavy, Boston Center, hello.
DAL30: Just to a heads up, we might be having a medical emergency here. We’ll get back to you. But it looks like we may have to go into Boston. We'll ... we’ll get back to you, just wanna give you a heads up.
CENTER: Delta 30, roger, I missed the first part, but I understand you might need to go to Boston, thank you.
DAL30: Roger, we’ll let you know either way. We’re talking to doctors.
CENTER: …
CENTER: Delta 30 Heavy, proceed direct to WHALE.
COMMENTS: It seems that the pilots missed that instruction.
DAL30: Center, Delta 30.
CENTER: Say again.
DAL30: Boston, Delta 30.
CENTER: Go ahead.
DAL30: Yeah, we’re gonna declare the medical emergency and divert into Boston, please.
CENTER: Delta 30, roger, you’re cleared to Boston via radar vectors, turn left heading 050, descend and maintain 11000.
DAL30: 050, down to 11000, Delta 30.
CENTER: Delta 30, Boston altimeter is 3032.
DAL30: 3032, thank you.
CENTER: And Delta 30, when you have a moment could you give me the details of the patient.
DAL30: Diabetic seizure, for Delta 30.
CENTER: Roger and I need age and a sex.
DAL30: Male and we’re not sure of age. Middle-aged. Hold on a second.
DAL30: We don’t have an age yet but he is a male, traveling alone, so we’ll get back to you.
CENTER: Delta 30, roger, no problem.
CENTER: Delta 30, cleared direct Boston Airport.
DAL30: Direct to Boston Airport, Delta 30 Heavy, thanks.
CENTER: Delta 30, reaching 2, correction, reaching 11000 maintain 250 knots.
DAL30: Delta 30, reaching 11000 250 speed.
CENTER: Delta 30, can you confirm that the patient is being attended by anyone?
DAL30: Delta 30, affirmative, he’s being attended by paramedics and a nurse.
CENTER: Thank you.
CENTER: Delta 30, fly heading 010, Approach’s request.
DAL30: 010, Delta 30.
DAL30: And just confirm that heading 010, for Delta 30.
CENTER: Delta 30, affirmative, heading 010.
DAL30: Thank you, Delta 30.
CENTER: Delta 30, contact Boston Approach 120.6, good night.
DAL30: 120.6, thanks for the help, Delta 30.
CENTER: No problem.
DAL30: Approach, Delta 30 Heavy, leveling off at 11000, slowing to 250, with the emergency.
APPROACH: Delta 30 Heavy, Boston Approach, speed is your discretion, fly present heading and descend at pilot’s discretion and maintain 5000.
------ This is maximum I can write here. Do you want more? Write in comments and I'll give you remaining part of text communications ------
THE VALUE OF THIS VIDEO:
THE MAIN VALUE IS EDUCATION. This reconstruction will be useful for actual or future air traffic controllers and pilots, people who plan to connect life with aviation, who like aviation. With help of this video reconstruction you’ll learn how to use radiotelephony rules, Aviation English language and general English language (for people whose native language is not English) in situation in flight, which was shown. THE MAIN REASON I DO THIS IS TO HELP PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND EVERY EMERGENCY SITUATION, EVERY WORD AND EVERY MOVE OF AIRCRAFT.
SOURCES OF MATERIAL, LICENSES AND PERMISSIONS:
Source of communications - www.liveatc.net/ (I have a permission (Letter) for commercial use of radio communications from LiveATC.net).
Map, aerial pictures (License (ODbL) ©OpenStreetMap -www.openstreet...) Permission for commercial use, royalty-free use.
Radar screen (In new versions of videos) - Made by author.
Text version of communication - Made by Author.
Video editing - Made by author.
HOW I DO VIDEOS:
1) I monitor media, airspace, looking for any non-standard, emergency and interesting situation.
2) I find communications of ATC unit for the period of time I need.
3) I take only phrases between air traffic controller and selected flight.
4) I find a flight path of selected aircraft.
5) I make an animation (early couple of videos don’t have animation) of flight path and aircraft, where the aircraft goes on his route.
6) When I edit video I put phrases of communications to specific points in video (in tandem with animation).
7) Together with my comments (voice and text) I edit and make a reconstruction of emergency, non-standard and interesting situation in flight.
Interesting bit of trivia a lot of people might not know but there is actually a service called Medlink that airlines can use in flight to be able to get a phone patch with a doctor in order to help with medical emergencies in flight. I work as a dispatcher with a United express carrier and because we have smaller aircraft and fewer passengers, the chance of a doctor on board is low so we use this service more regularly.
even if there was a doctor on board, most doctors would not want to get involved. As soon as they touch the person, they are now liable for lawsuit. We live in a cynical age.
@@marks6663 Naah, not exactly right. Most airlines have a pretty clear insurance policy covering any first aiders (professionals and non-prof). But yeah, it definitly helps to check beforehand what the airline company is offering as protection.
@@marks6663 actually they’d be more open to a lawsuit for negligence if they did NOT assist
Boston is a good place to divert to - every other person works in a hospital lol.
Many things. If there is an airline contracted doc in a box (as we call them here), any treatment rendered is on their license. As well, apparently the airline covers responders on their liability policy when requested. As well, the good faith responder laws ‘generally’ mitigate suits as long as the responder did not go above their abilities or licensure (directives from the doc notwithstanding). As for repercussions from not rendering aid, if you do not identify yourself as a trained responder, it is much more an ethical issue than legal. They cannot pull your license for not responding outside of your duty (which while in first class on holiday, three Irish Mules in, is effectively nil). However the abandonment of care still applies, if you cease care before handed off to another responder with equal or higher abilities, qualifications, and/or licensing, then you will likely hear about it later. And don’t go above and beyond your skills, for the love of god. I went to EMT certification classes. Not an EMT, just the skills. I can administer oxygen, assist with aspirin, attempt an airway, and perform cpr till the cows come home (of course under the certificate of someone actually certified), but a diabetic seizure? 😬🤷🏼♂️. The advantages of an aircraft with two hundred some odd passengers between two large population and medical centres.
I watched that aircraft come in and thought it was a regular flight. Good to know they got the help needed.
Ok. So. Did the patient survive? How long were they on the ground or was there a plane transfer?.....
Possibly. For a period of time. Don't know. Thanks for posting Billie Vic.
We have some of the best hospitals on earth here in Boston, so they certainly picked a good spot in the air to have a medical emergency. Disclosing patient info could and probably would be a HIPAA violation so I wouldn't expect the airline or anyone else to make a statement on their wellbeing. It appears the flight continued on to London and in fact had less than a two hour delay in total despite all of this, which is pretty impressive.
strange why he was giving a speed restriction initially of 250 with a medical emergency
Well either way by the time they reached 10000 they’d have to be at 250 anyway on the speed
@@jakeoesterreich8037 I know all aircraft should be at 250 knots by 10000 but for a medical emergency the controller should be giving them no speed restriction like the approach controller who told them speed is at their discretion.
@@aviationmayhem We'll put you on Boston Approach for a few hours and see how badly you F up everything.
Assume there was a switch from the ILS to visual approach?
In a case of a situation like this who will pay for the costs? Does the airline eat the cost? Do they try to go after the passenger and make his insurance company pay? The airlines will incur a lot of expenses when they reroute for medical emergencies.
Yes. Airline will pay it or maybe they are insured against these situations. But no passenger has to pay for it
The airline pays
Airlines cost of doing business.
@@Kuchenblech_Mafioso Thanks! I didn’t realize that the airlines insurance company will most likely pay. Thanks for answering.
That's an expensive item for the airline
Even though you were the first comment, thanks for not shouting First!
@@DBR00 I second that
How disgusting making them slow down with a medical emergency on board. Life is cheap in Murica.
Dumb Bells comment on Murica it seems eh Danny Jim?
@@RLTtizME I have no idea what you’re talking about.
@@DJ99777 You got the Dumb Bell part sweetie. Has any country claimed you? I bet not.