The difficulty we have is that debates and discussions are always going to be "triggering" to people. Anything worth discussing is, by definition, going to leave certain people feeling an injustice, outrage, disgust etc. Whilst that's par for the course with debates, we are now in an era in which people listen to reply, rather than listening to understand. Consequently, it's neigh impossible at times to debate in any meaningful sense, as at least one side is likely to not be listening to the others case, instead waiting for a gap or pause in their speech so that they can interject (as was the case here). It's sad, but I think that as much as today's culture is to blame, the technology is too. When people are used to getting instant answers from a machine that doesn't talk back, question your logic, or pose hypothetical situations, all whilst offering opinion pieces slanted towards a particular narrative and fake statistics on social media sites, they find any kind of face-to-face debate too much. It's draining and frustrating to them, especially having to justify their position. So, instead they simply talk over the others, block their ears and remain in ignorant bliss. If we didn't have the technology we are blessed with, I suspect people would be more open to debates as it would be the only way to get information and other perspectives. People just don't want to hear it nowadays, unfortunately.
Miners used to keep caged canaries while mining coal. If the Canarie died, then the miners knew they'd opened up some sort of gas pocket and they needed to get out there quick to avoid suffocation. So the term Canarie in the Coal mine is used as a colloquialism to represent the idea of "a first sign of unfortunate events to come".
It doesn't feel like an interview, it feels like an interrogation. When he isn't giving the answer she wants to hear, she interupts and pushes back. And since she completely disagrees with everything he says, she doesn't let him complete a single thought.
Agree, i feel like that‘s journalism 101 nowadays to frame a question a certain way and put words in the opponent‘s mouth, just to create a story for clicks. SO ANNOYING!
Yea, she claims to be interviewing HIM but this is just a one sided debate...aka, an interrogation. When she doesn't get a response she likes she cuts him right off and argues back at him.
In terms of the interviewer - this is an (unfortunately) standard style of interviewing in the UK (when it comes to political or politically orientated topics). Her questions aren't meant to be eloquent, they're meant to be riling and rapid fire 'reactionary'.
It always backfires as they are all generally stupid. Stupid people have the confidence of the ignorant when going up against someone who is actually really intelligent.
Girls 2.0 are programmed to hate men paid by Georges Soros foundation .... Lot of girls have to sleep with men cause they have no other choice ... if there were aliens living here, , girls will sleep with the aliens.... Lot of girls start to have sex with their dogs or go lesbians ...they are fed with ideology to hate meb age fed with testosteron hormones to be a rival of men The establishment feeds animals with hormones... To grow fast and big The establishment puts in our food and dairies hormones so guys can turn gays and girls can turn lesbians... With a good gender program at school to brainwash the school boys and school girls....
We need to be able to discuss and debate difficult topics in order to better understand them. I'm glad there is content like this out there. It doesn't have to win you over, you just need to be open to hearing it.
She’s there simply for the good ole “got ya” questions. That’s it. It’s very clear she isn’t trying to learn about anything or anyone. Body language tone and demeanor are very telling.
Human nature is fundamentally insane and spreads like a virus and destroys and consumes everything in its path we are a pathetic worthless species floating on a rock in the vast abyss of the dark void of the cosmos
Girls 2.0 are programmed to hate men paid by Georges Soros foundation .... Lot of girls have to sleep with men cause they have no other choice ... if there were aliens living here, , girls will sleep with the aliens.... Lot of girls start to have sex with their dogs or go lesbians ...they are fed with ideology to hate meb age fed with testosteron hormones to be a rival of men The establishment feeds animals with hormones... To grow fast and big The establishment puts in our food and dairies hormones so guys can turn gays and girls can turn lesbians... With a good gender program at school to brainwash the school boys and school girls....
She is trying to get very literal with the word "control" when she knows that he isn't being literal with his use of "control". Her bias is showing for sure.
I am blessed (truly) to be in a friend group of about 30 people who are available and meet daily to talk about everything without offense. We have people of Every race, sex, age group, class, and political affiliation. I swear the discourse keeps me alive, but I also love that when anyone in the group has a problem, they have 30+ friends who will do anything for them. That’s what the people really need.. discourse and support.
Here's a surprising fact for you. They're trying to revoke his license in Canada. And one of the examples cited was that he kept fiddling with his wedding ring while talking to a female. And that was CLEARLY a sign of aggression and masogony towards her. So when you fiddle with your stuff, don't forget that it's an act of aggression. Lol.
@pstew5309 lol, then every man and woman who suffers from ADD/ADHD is very aggressive. 😂 How terrified my teachers must have been of me (a 5'4 woman) when I was in school!
@murphygirl4782 Well, you just need to understand how aggressive you are. And nothing you ever do will atone for those sins. I honestly don't know how you live with yourself lol. It's laughable. Except it's the board of psychology entertaining it as a reason to remove somebody's license. So it's terrifying.
Girls 2.0 are programmed to hate men paid by Georges Soros foundation .... Lot of girls have to sleep with men cause they have no other choice ... if there were aliens living here, , girls will sleep with the aliens.... Lot of girls start to have sex with their dogs or go lesbians ...they are fed with ideology to hate meb age fed with testosteron hormones to be a rival of men The establishment feeds animals with hormones... To grow fast and big The establishment puts in our food and dairies hormones so guys can turn gays and girls can turn lesbians... With a good gender program at school to brainwash the school boys and school girls....
Keep reacting to what you find enjoyable. I started watching you because of some music reactions but enjoy these as well. I'm a conservative Christian and, without knowing for sure, would guess that we wouldn't agree on every topic. But you also seem like someone open-minded with a cool personality who I would like to be around in real life. And, as you said, we've lost a lot of that by hating anyone who disagrees even slightly with what we do. Keep it up!
I agree with you, she is not at all receptive to what he says. Ironically, she's just trying to dismantle his reputation, while denying that women manifest aggression in that regard.
i like your commentary on the likes of JP and ben shapiro. refreshing to hear a more centrist take on them than the far right or left where its nothing but hero worship or seething hatred
You're using Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro and the word "centrist" in the same sentence? They're both alt right, Peterson is a fucking documented pedophile and woman hating cancer cell. Shapiro is a Jewish anti-Jew, anti-women, anti-vax, anti-black cancer cell.
The way she looks downward everytime is almost like, she already has the answer in her head that he'll give to something, therefore she doesn't listen as she should've to have made a correct conversation/discussion.
The canary in the coal mine was the fact tht they used to bring canaries in coal mines, and if the fucker passed out, cause they are extremely sensitive to a lowering in the amount of oxygen they would pass out.
This interview feels frustrating because it isn’t an interview, it’s a hit job. She’s out to trap him and getting frustrated because he won’t just accept her premises, etc. That’s why she continues to jump around from thing to thing. If she’s not ‘getting’ him on one issue she has to jump to something else. She thinks he’s bad and she wants viewers to agree with her. So if he is sounding reasonable, she has to move on to something else.
Bro, you are nailing it (lol, during the me2 portion). Your comments are 100% accurate. In her mind, me saying that she could me fired or arrested if we worked together lol
There will always be predators, as JP says. We can teach ideas of ethical behavior in schools, but there will be some predators anyway. It is every individual's responsibility to understand this and to take certain measures to protect their well-being.
You're good man ! Keep going on ! Never let other stop you or botter you in your way of doing things ! I loved listening your video and love your vibes bro ! Namaste 🔥
Canary in the coal mine... Back in the days when technology as we know it today was basically non-existing, it was hard to detect potential danger hundreds of meters under the ground. The greatest danger for miners are gasses. Some of them have no smell and are extremely toxic. That is why the miners carried a canary with them into the shaft and constantly kept one eye on the bird. If the canary suddenly fell to the bottom of the cage, someone would raise the alarm and all the miners were to evacuate ASAP!
Canary in the coalmine originates from the fact that coalminers used to bring canaries in cages on the job back in the day because of how fragile they are. If they suddenly dropped dead while in the mine, it was good evidence the mine was dangerous in some way, as in lack of oxygen, too much radiation, etc and allowed the miners to escape because the death of the canary warned them
Regarding the telephone or social networks, when there are many stimuli in a short period of time, people tend to be left with very little. It is the same in long conversations where there are discussions or in a podcast for example of a couple of hours, when stimuli do not generate knowledge or attraction are easily forgotten
Her smirk acting like she had a “gotcha” moment but sure failed miserably. She made it about only woman when he was only talking about someone being out of control and not even trying to assume they need to be controlled.
I believe there may be some issues within the BBC and among BBC journalists. It appears as though there is an agenda, and they might be compromising their professionalism to pursue it. I think an investigation should be conducted to understand what's happening.
"Canary in the coal mine" refers to the way coal miners would take a caged canary down the mine with them. The bird's behavior was their way of monitoring the air quality. The bird would be affected by poisonous gasses first, which would give the miners time to get out before succumbing. I always felt bad for the birds.
Some women don’t understand virtually all men have an understand of the hierarchy of violence amongst other men. It’s what keeps us controlled. As a man I know I can’t just go up to another man and just start acting any way, because there is a change that man will react back violently. It’s not fear it’s an unspoken respect men have with each other and we all know that what ever we say can have consequences and so good men act right knowing that if they do not they may be put into place.
I'm not very familiar with this international political scenario, especially when it comes to political figures, so I can only speak based on my general knowledge. From what I gathered, this Jordan Peterson is a figure from the far-right and some might say he holds misogynistic views. As for this woman, whom I wasn't familiar with either, she seems to be a left-wing journalist. The issue here, as far as I can see, is that both individuals in the interview display extreme hostility. Even though Jordan Peterson may be eloquent and composed, his words also carry hostility. This isn't a value judgment, just an observation. But the central point of this whole story, ultimately, from what I can understand, revolves around a society where historically, men have oppressed women through aggressive actions, whether physical or psychological. Anyone who disagrees with this is either living in a different reality or has ill intentions. The numbers, the data, don't lie. Is it not true that there's a significant occurrence of domestic violence cases against women? The statistics consistently reveal alarming rates of domestic abuse directed towards women, highlighting a deeply rooted societal issue that cannot be ignored. This violence perpetuates a cycle of fear and harm, affecting countless lives. Is it not true that women in similar positions as men generally receive lower salaries? Gender pay disparities are indeed a stark reality. Numerous studies have demonstrated that women, on average, earn less than their male counterparts in comparable roles and with similar qualifications. This isn't merely an isolated phenomenon but a systemic bias that hinders women's economic empowerment. Furthermore, the under representation of women in leadership roles and key decision-making positions across various industries showcases the persisting gender gap in opportunities and recognition. The glass ceiling remains a tangible barrier for women seeking equal professional growth. In sum, the evidence is irrefutable: systemic sexism and misogyny are deeply ingrained in our society. To deny these realities is to perpetuate the very inequality that many are working to address and dismantle. These examples are indeed facts and demonstrate that there are significant issues stemming from the entrenched sexism within various structures of our society. It's one thing to point out potential exaggerations in reactions from left-leaning individuals, which can be valid. However, it's another matter entirely to claim that problems originating from sexism do not exist in our society. Lastly, Alex, I used to be one of your fans, and I always enjoyed your content and your reactions to movies and series. But now, your political stance worries me. Are you aligning yourself with the extreme right-wing group of people who don't acknowledge sexism, racism, and misogyny as real problems? Do you think it's all just a fabrication of the left? Do you believe that everyone is "too sensitive" these days? In the end... perhaps empathy is truly lacking; the ability to put oneself in the shoes of others seems to be increasingly rare and dismissed by some.
Alex, of course you’d be more likely to use words, you’ve studied to become a lawyer. Lawyers use words to fight. That doesn’t make you feminine. I myself tend to try to de escalate a confrontation with words first, and it has served me quite well. I’m not afraid of a physical confrontation though, but I’m also careful about that route. I’m built like you dude, so I’m not looking for a physical confrontation, but if that’s what it comes to, that’s what it is. You CAN have a balance of words and physicality, but you have to find the balance that is right for you. Man, I love the way you think. I’d love to have a beer with you. You are one of the most open minded, yet pragmatic, people on social media. I bet we’d disagree on some things, but we’d also agree on others.
This woman wants her questions answered inside the paradigm of “feelings of the matter” rather than actual 👉🏽facts of the matter👈🏽… it’s like having a conversation with someone about Santa Claus! 😒
This reminded me of when me and my friends were enjoying some dark humor among ourselves, one time we were making fun of the bald one and everyone was laughing including him, all of a sudden a young lady showed up to our table, all angry, gave us a speech how she was offended and we should be ashamed of ourselves making fun of bald people, she didnt even care about our friend or how he felt, she was just triggered on behalf of bald people and chose to disrupt our conversation to gave us a speech, made a scene. Its all about the attitude in my opinion, you can't just label and scream to people.. just discuss and leave peacefully, its not that hard honestly
I never wear make up in the office, why would I? Some women will say they wear make up for themselves. LIES. They wouldn't be wearing make up if they were the only person left in the world.
With regards to the section about dress codes, they are both wearing suits. However, his is navy and hers is green. Imagine it being the other way around.
It would be SO difficult for me to not lose my cool on this woman. Jordan maintains control like the self contained master that he is. This is a great example of why I admire this man so much. ❤
This problem now a days is they can’t have debates like this woman can’t. This is an interrogation and emotional responses based on what she has been programmed to believe based on nothing but delusion and emotional responses. They can’t cope with facts or anything that doesn’t fully agree with what they believe
Open-minded individuals are rare these days! Keep up the great content and don’t let the projections of others pain stop you from doing what you feel is right to grow aa a human being….thank you for sharing!
Todo lo que a mencionado, la Mujer lo siente también. La Diferencia es que el Hombre es mas Physical and Direct y esto puede lleva a los extremos. La verdad es que todos(hombres/mujeres) deberían controlar sus emociones.
Her questions are pre-planned and have a certain agenda in mind. She is looking for something to use against Dr.Peterson. Her statement "I am not interviewing the clinical literature, I am interviewing you." Tells me that she doesn't want facts or the truth of the science, she wants ammunition against him. Which is why all of her questions are pointed and mostly opinionated. She is looking for a certain type of response to use as entrapment.
Any time anyone tries to say Peterson is a smart man, I have to remind them that he was tricked into posting fetish porn on social media because he thought it was proof of some conspiracy he believed in.
I can't believe they even posted this video of a woman coursing/badgering a man into saying something they can spin into click bait. She has absolutely no interest in what he has to say...what a bad interviewer. She's constantly cutting him off and trying her best to corner him. She said she was there to "interview HIM" yet she asks about everything but HIM lol. She keeps asking questions but doesn't let him finish his response. You are supposed to ask a question and save your rebuttal for after the person your interviewing answers the damn question.
Jordan's point on workplace restrictions is huge and a real shame that it got brushed aside. People naturally find others attractive, attractive people tend to get more attention and advances from the opposite gender, how do we regulate that? Men tend to be uniform, we wear shirt, tie and long pants, largely the same. A woman can wear a variety of things that would be seen as dressed nicely, including low cut tops that show a little more chest, skirts that show leg, and high heals that pop out the posterior. All of which is appropriate for work. Add make-up to appear more youthful and, intentionally or not, they will invite more eyeballs and attention, and it's hard to just call it men's fault, this is exploiting deep rooted, biological base desires. I do not condone or deny the inappropriate actions of certain men. It's just common knowledge that men are very sensitive to visual cues surrounding women, if a breast is slightly exposed, we notice. Women might say it's their choice and for men to keep it in their pants, maybe. If a man came in to work with the top buttons undone giving a sneak peak at his pecks, tighter pants showing the curvature of his rear and bulge, I'm certain you would say that he is dressed inappropriately and that the workplace is for work, not to mingle or to swoon the ladies. I hope this example makes sense, and underlines the complexity of the issue. Humans are animals that want to have sex with each other, so how do we put Men and Women in a room together and regulate their behavior above base biological desires without becoming a tyranny? No Idea
The problem with him is that he looks at a pattern, and work from the assumption that the pattern and differences are based inherently in nature, and disregard nurture and systematic cultural pressures. There are plenty of studies that show how people treat kids differently based on what gender they believe they are as opposed to what they are. What is doesn’t always have to be.
"but why do they have to express aggression" while leaning forward, eyes wide open with a riled up voice....
Debates and discussion are necessary tools for a healthy society.
Unfortunately this was neither.
not when they're complete puff pieces and one sided
The difficulty we have is that debates and discussions are always going to be "triggering" to people. Anything worth discussing is, by definition, going to leave certain people feeling an injustice, outrage, disgust etc. Whilst that's par for the course with debates, we are now in an era in which people listen to reply, rather than listening to understand. Consequently, it's neigh impossible at times to debate in any meaningful sense, as at least one side is likely to not be listening to the others case, instead waiting for a gap or pause in their speech so that they can interject (as was the case here). It's sad, but I think that as much as today's culture is to blame, the technology is too. When people are used to getting instant answers from a machine that doesn't talk back, question your logic, or pose hypothetical situations, all whilst offering opinion pieces slanted towards a particular narrative and fake statistics on social media sites, they find any kind of face-to-face debate too much. It's draining and frustrating to them, especially having to justify their position. So, instead they simply talk over the others, block their ears and remain in ignorant bliss. If we didn't have the technology we are blessed with, I suspect people would be more open to debates as it would be the only way to get information and other perspectives. People just don't want to hear it nowadays, unfortunately.
@@JBW27 I couldn't agree more.
Yeah, except every debate or discussion has turned into a dunking contest.
Miners used to keep caged canaries while mining coal. If the Canarie died, then the miners knew they'd opened up some sort of gas pocket and they needed to get out there quick to avoid suffocation. So the term Canarie in the Coal mine is used as a colloquialism to represent the idea of "a first sign of unfortunate events to come".
It doesn't feel like an interview, it feels like an interrogation. When he isn't giving the answer she wants to hear, she interupts and pushes back. And since she completely disagrees with everything he says, she doesn't let him complete a single thought.
It’s the fact she is a women. Every women does this, it’s an instinct.
@@turktalkdude Very helpful sir... very helpful 🙄
Agree, i feel like that‘s journalism 101 nowadays to frame a question a certain way and put words in the opponent‘s mouth, just to create a story for clicks. SO ANNOYING!
Yea, she claims to be interviewing HIM but this is just a one sided debate...aka, an interrogation. When she doesn't get a response she likes she cuts him right off and argues back at him.
@@awesome_by_defaultit's true though 😂
In terms of the interviewer - this is an (unfortunately) standard style of interviewing in the UK (when it comes to political or politically orientated topics). Her questions aren't meant to be eloquent, they're meant to be riling and rapid fire 'reactionary'.
The right is the reactionary party though....
These "journalists" have abandoned the journalism. They simply want to be the one that makes JP look stupid, and they are not good at this
It always backfires as they are all generally stupid. Stupid people have the confidence of the ignorant when going up against someone who is actually really intelligent.
He's stupid on himself he thinks animals don't kill other animals outside of food and he has other bs takes
Girls 2.0 are programmed to hate men paid by Georges Soros foundation .... Lot of girls have to sleep with men cause they have no other choice ... if there were aliens living here, , girls will sleep with the aliens.... Lot of girls start to have sex with their dogs or go lesbians ...they are fed with ideology to hate meb age fed with testosteron hormones to be a rival of men
The establishment feeds animals with hormones... To grow fast and big
The establishment puts in our food and dairies hormones so guys can turn gays and girls can turn lesbians... With a good gender program at school to brainwash the school boys and school girls....
They want to get clicks; the content is immaterial.
We need to be able to discuss and debate difficult topics in order to better understand them. I'm glad there is content like this out there. It doesn't have to win you over, you just need to be open to hearing it.
She’s there simply for the good ole “got ya” questions. That’s it. It’s very clear she isn’t trying to learn about anything or anyone. Body language tone and demeanor are very telling.
I love the fact that Jordan Peterson is just sitting there doodling calmly while answering her passive aggressive questions.
Yeah… she started out right off being passive aggressive!
She is almost blaming him for human nature, which doesn't approve of.
Human nature is fundamentally insane and spreads like a virus and destroys and consumes everything in its path we are a pathetic worthless species floating on a rock in the vast abyss of the dark void of the cosmos
Exactly what I was thinking. Hollywood was acting that way and Jordan Peterson should have done something about that. Lol!
That's a modern feminist for ya.
Girls 2.0 are programmed to hate men paid by Georges Soros foundation .... Lot of girls have to sleep with men cause they have no other choice ... if there were aliens living here, , girls will sleep with the aliens.... Lot of girls start to have sex with their dogs or go lesbians ...they are fed with ideology to hate meb age fed with testosteron hormones to be a rival of men
The establishment feeds animals with hormones... To grow fast and big
The establishment puts in our food and dairies hormones so guys can turn gays and girls can turn lesbians... With a good gender program at school to brainwash the school boys and school girls....
And all the time he just sits there doodling while she tries to and fails to catch him out. He was just sublime in his wordplay and detailed retorts.
She is trying to get very literal with the word "control" when she knows that he isn't being literal with his use of "control". Her bias is showing for sure.
This female is NOT a female advocate. She is just focusing on attacking this male, and not actually dealing with actual woman's issues.
Love when you post these conservations.
I am blessed (truly) to be in a friend group of about 30 people who are available and meet daily to talk about everything without offense. We have people of Every race, sex, age group, class, and political affiliation. I swear the discourse keeps me alive, but I also love that when anyone in the group has a problem, they have 30+ friends who will do anything for them. That’s what the people really need.. discourse and support.
A lot of the interviewers here in the UK all tried to catch him out some how rather than just having a discussion. This isn’t even the worst example.
I love how he's messing with his notepad the whole time. 😂 I can relate. I have to do that kind of stuff all the time.
Here's a surprising fact for you. They're trying to revoke his license in Canada. And one of the examples cited was that he kept fiddling with his wedding ring while talking to a female. And that was CLEARLY a sign of aggression and masogony towards her. So when you fiddle with your stuff, don't forget that it's an act of aggression. Lol.
@pstew5309 lol, then every man and woman who suffers from ADD/ADHD is very aggressive. 😂 How terrified my teachers must have been of me (a 5'4 woman) when I was in school!
@murphygirl4782 Well, you just need to understand how aggressive you are. And nothing you ever do will atone for those sins. I honestly don't know how you live with yourself lol. It's laughable. Except it's the board of psychology entertaining it as a reason to remove somebody's license. So it's terrifying.
Girls 2.0 are programmed to hate men paid by Georges Soros foundation .... Lot of girls have to sleep with men cause they have no other choice ... if there were aliens living here, , girls will sleep with the aliens.... Lot of girls start to have sex with their dogs or go lesbians ...they are fed with ideology to hate meb age fed with testosteron hormones to be a rival of men
The establishment feeds animals with hormones... To grow fast and big
The establishment puts in our food and dairies hormones so guys can turn gays and girls can turn lesbians... With a good gender program at school to brainwash the school boys and school girls....
Keep reacting to what you find enjoyable. I started watching you because of some music reactions but enjoy these as well. I'm a conservative Christian and, without knowing for sure, would guess that we wouldn't agree on every topic. But you also seem like someone open-minded with a cool personality who I would like to be around in real life. And, as you said, we've lost a lot of that by hating anyone who disagrees even slightly with what we do. Keep it up!
I agree with you, she is not at all receptive to what he says. Ironically, she's just trying to dismantle his reputation, while denying that women manifest aggression in that regard.
His reaction at 7.30 was my reaction to everything she said in this entire interview.
i like your commentary on the likes of JP and ben shapiro. refreshing to hear a more centrist take on them than the far right or left where its nothing but hero worship or seething hatred
You're using Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro and the word "centrist" in the same sentence? They're both alt right, Peterson is a fucking documented pedophile and woman hating cancer cell. Shapiro is a Jewish anti-Jew, anti-women, anti-vax, anti-black cancer cell.
Wise words my man, take my upvote
Seeing JP as a hero isn't a far right thing ...
@@taylemgames2652I couldn't agree more, but mainstream media would have you believe otherwise which is sad
It is.@@taylemgames2652
She seems to take the gossiping part personally.
Imagine my shock lol
Yes women can't help but filter it through their feelings. A man says this about women, he must mean me, he attacks me, must fight him on this.
The way she looks downward everytime is almost like, she already has the answer in her head that he'll give to something, therefore she doesn't listen as she should've to have made a correct conversation/discussion.
When he makes points it's like she has a forcefield around her head and you can see the points pinging but unable to get through.
Love you Alex. Keep doing your thing brother!
I love how he’s just doodling the whole time completely disinterested while she’s trying to smear him and he still owns her
The canary in the coal mine was the fact tht they used to bring canaries in coal mines, and if the fucker passed out, cause they are extremely sensitive to a lowering in the amount of oxygen they would pass out.
This interview feels frustrating because it isn’t an interview, it’s a hit job. She’s out to trap him and getting frustrated because he won’t just accept her premises, etc. That’s why she continues to jump around from thing to thing. If she’s not ‘getting’ him on one issue she has to jump to something else. She thinks he’s bad and she wants viewers to agree with her. So if he is sounding reasonable, she has to move on to something else.
Nailed it.
Ah shit, here we go again..
It seems she wants to ask leading questions without being called out.
She’s “debating” like she’s in Parliament, they talk over each other all the time.
I was hoping he’d have retorted to her about bullying with “much how you’re behaving right now”.
Bro, you are nailing it (lol, during the me2 portion). Your comments are 100% accurate.
In her mind, me saying that she could me fired or arrested if we worked together lol
Jordan Peterson was just doodling on his notepad throughout this interview 😂 absolute genius
“Is it me or do her questions bug the shit out of you too?” Yes sir, well said.
Her body language is ...yikes lol. As a woman, never would I try to befriend this
"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but something will ALWAYS offend a feminist".
There will always be predators, as JP says. We can teach ideas of ethical behavior in schools, but there will be some predators anyway. It is every individual's responsibility to understand this and to take certain measures to protect their well-being.
You're good man ! Keep going on ! Never let other stop you or botter you in your way of doing things ! I loved listening your video and love your vibes bro ! Namaste 🔥
Canary in the coal mine...
Back in the days when technology as we know it today was basically non-existing, it was hard to detect potential danger hundreds of meters under the ground. The greatest danger for miners are gasses. Some of them have no smell and are extremely toxic. That is why the miners carried a canary with them into the shaft and constantly kept one eye on the bird. If the canary suddenly fell to the bottom of the cage, someone would raise the alarm and all the miners were to evacuate ASAP!
Canary in the coalmine originates from the fact that coalminers used to bring canaries in cages on the job back in the day because of how fragile they are. If they suddenly dropped dead while in the mine, it was good evidence the mine was dangerous in some way, as in lack of oxygen, too much radiation, etc and allowed the miners to escape because the death of the canary warned them
Regarding the telephone or social networks, when there are many stimuli in a short period of time, people tend to be left with very little. It is the same in long conversations where there are discussions or in a podcast for example of a couple of hours, when stimuli do not generate knowledge or attraction are easily forgotten
You need to check out "Jordan Peterson DEBATES With Intelligent Student On HATE SPEECH". Pure gold IMHO.
Keep doing these conversation provoking videos! Thanks Alex
I have one of my co workers exactly like her. Its truly a heavy load having her around the workplace.
Her smirk acting like she had a “gotcha” moment but sure failed miserably. She made it about only woman when he was only talking about someone being out of control and not even trying to assume they need to be controlled.
Notice how she cant hold eye contact with Jordan.
“Trust the experts” “ive studied the literature for 15years”
I believe there may be some issues within the BBC and among BBC journalists. It appears as though there is an agenda, and they might be compromising their professionalism to pursue it. I think an investigation should be conducted to understand what's happening.
She is doing EXACTLY what Jordan said. She's using words as an act of aggression. The entire interview she's trying to destroy his reputation.
She’s not there to exchange ideas. She’s doing the typical gotcha media questioning and when he makes valid points she quickly moves on
Link to the full interview?
"Canary in the coal mine" refers to the way coal miners would take a caged canary down the mine with them. The bird's behavior was their way of monitoring the air quality. The bird would be affected by poisonous gasses first, which would give the miners time to get out before succumbing. I always felt bad for the birds.
Some women don’t understand virtually all men have an understand of the hierarchy of violence amongst other men. It’s what keeps us controlled. As a man I know I can’t just go up to another man and just start acting any way, because there is a change that man will react back violently. It’s not fear it’s an unspoken respect men have with each other and we all know that what ever we say can have consequences and so good men act right knowing that if they do not they may be put into place.
I'm not very familiar with this international political scenario, especially when it comes to political figures, so I can only speak based on my general knowledge. From what I gathered, this Jordan Peterson is a figure from the far-right and some might say he holds misogynistic views. As for this woman, whom I wasn't familiar with either, she seems to be a left-wing journalist.
The issue here, as far as I can see, is that both individuals in the interview display extreme hostility. Even though Jordan Peterson may be eloquent and composed, his words also carry hostility. This isn't a value judgment, just an observation.
But the central point of this whole story, ultimately, from what I can understand, revolves around a society where historically, men have oppressed women through aggressive actions, whether physical or psychological. Anyone who disagrees with this is either living in a different reality or has ill intentions. The numbers, the data, don't lie.
Is it not true that there's a significant occurrence of domestic violence cases against women? The statistics consistently reveal alarming rates of domestic abuse directed towards women, highlighting a deeply rooted societal issue that cannot be ignored. This violence perpetuates a cycle of fear and harm, affecting countless lives.
Is it not true that women in similar positions as men generally receive lower salaries? Gender pay disparities are indeed a stark reality. Numerous studies have demonstrated that women, on average, earn less than their male counterparts in comparable roles and with similar qualifications. This isn't merely an isolated phenomenon but a systemic bias that hinders women's economic empowerment.
Furthermore, the under representation of women in leadership roles and key decision-making positions across various industries showcases the persisting gender gap in opportunities and recognition. The glass ceiling remains a tangible barrier for women seeking equal professional growth.
In sum, the evidence is irrefutable: systemic sexism and misogyny are deeply ingrained in our society. To deny these realities is to perpetuate the very inequality that many are working to address and dismantle. These examples are indeed facts and demonstrate that there are significant issues stemming from the entrenched sexism within various structures of our society. It's one thing to point out potential exaggerations in reactions from left-leaning individuals, which can be valid. However, it's another matter entirely to claim that problems originating from sexism do not exist in our society.
Lastly, Alex, I used to be one of your fans, and I always enjoyed your content and your reactions to movies and series. But now, your political stance worries me. Are you aligning yourself with the extreme right-wing group of people who don't acknowledge sexism, racism, and misogyny as real problems? Do you think it's all just a fabrication of the left? Do you believe that everyone is "too sensitive" these days?
In the end... perhaps empathy is truly lacking; the ability to put oneself in the shoes of others seems to be increasingly rare and dismissed by some.
I’m with you 100% it’s concerning. I’d love to hear Alex clarify things.
I think she’s trying to induce a gotcha
People like her try to fight and argue with the reality of life and then find themselves stuck in the hole of ignorance and delusion
Alex, of course you’d be more likely to use words, you’ve studied to become a lawyer. Lawyers use words to fight. That doesn’t make you feminine. I myself tend to try to de escalate a confrontation with words first, and it has served me quite well. I’m not afraid of a physical confrontation though, but I’m also careful about that route. I’m built like you dude, so I’m not looking for a physical confrontation, but if that’s what it comes to, that’s what it is. You CAN have a balance of words and physicality, but you have to find the balance that is right for you.
Man, I love the way you think. I’d love to have a beer with you. You are one of the most open minded, yet pragmatic, people on social media. I bet we’d disagree on some things, but we’d also agree on others.
I'm glad to see you reacting to these types of videos. Don't stop, love to see it! Much love from North Idaho
This lady is horrible 🤦♀️ she doesn't even listen or let him finish
I agree, I follow ppl I dont necessarily agree with because I feel like hearing all sides is thought provoking.
This woman wants her questions answered inside the paradigm of “feelings of the matter” rather than actual
👉🏽facts of the matter👈🏽… it’s like having a conversation with someone about Santa Claus! 😒
This reminded me of when me and my friends were enjoying some dark humor among ourselves, one time we were making fun of the bald one and everyone was laughing including him, all of a sudden a young lady showed up to our table, all angry, gave us a speech how she was offended and we should be ashamed of ourselves making fun of bald people, she didnt even care about our friend or how he felt, she was just triggered on behalf of bald people and chose to disrupt our conversation to gave us a speech, made a scene. Its all about the attitude in my opinion, you can't just label and scream to people.. just discuss and leave peacefully, its not that hard honestly
This woman is disturbed!
I love these types of videos that makes me think, keep them coming
More please
I never wear make up in the office, why would I? Some women will say they wear make up for themselves. LIES. They wouldn't be wearing make up if they were the only person left in the world.
With regards to the section about dress codes, they are both wearing suits. However, his is navy and hers is green. Imagine it being the other way around.
You tell em Alex!
Intelligence is what you know. It's what you do with what you know.
BBC and Journalism have 0 correlation in today's era.
Hey bro. Just wanted to make sure you're safe from those fires out there.
I hope so too it's getting very hectic over there
You're a reasonable guy in a crazy world. I appreciate that.
Aw fuck. Going down THIS rabbit hole huh?
It would be SO difficult for me to not lose my cool on this woman. Jordan maintains control like the self contained master that he is. This is a great example of why I admire this man so much. ❤
If I could keep my cool as well as that...
What chair are you sitting on?
She is delusional, would argue sky is pink to try n score a point.
alex, how are you and your family out there?
hope you are all fine
This problem now a days is they can’t have debates like this woman can’t. This is an interrogation and emotional responses based on what she has been programmed to believe based on nothing but delusion and emotional responses. They can’t cope with facts or anything that doesn’t fully agree with what they believe
This is like Georges St. Pierre fighting a toddler in the octagon.
Why does it feel like they ask questions for a "gotcha" moment?
Hope you’re safe Alex
People who get upset about others watching people's opinions are the people who don't want you to have an opinion unless it's their own.
Open-minded individuals are rare these days! Keep up the great content and don’t let the projections of others pain stop you from doing what you feel is right to grow aa a human being….thank you for sharing!
You as American didn't knew what canary reference means?! 🙃🤦♀ Me as Latvian even understand it.
IMO, the phrase isn't hugely common in the US. I've mainly heard it used when discussing antisemitism.
Peterspin 😂
Clean your room, damn it!
Gas in a coal mine was hard to detect, odorless. They would bring a caged canary down with them. If the canary died, they hauled ass out of there.
Where are all these sect members coming from?
Sounds like she trying to do a gotcha moment
Todo lo que a mencionado, la Mujer lo siente también. La Diferencia es que el Hombre es mas Physical and Direct y esto puede lleva a los extremos.
La verdad es que todos(hombres/mujeres) deberían controlar sus emociones.
Her questions are pre-planned and have a certain agenda in mind. She is looking for something to use against Dr.Peterson. Her statement "I am not interviewing the clinical literature, I am interviewing you." Tells me that she doesn't want facts or the truth of the science, she wants ammunition against him. Which is why all of her questions are pointed and mostly opinionated. She is looking for a certain type of response to use as entrapment.
Make me Famous by Kim Dracula you won’t regret it.
Any time anyone tries to say Peterson is a smart man, I have to remind them that he was tricked into posting fetish porn on social media because he thought it was proof of some conspiracy he believed in.
I can't believe they even posted this video of a woman coursing/badgering a man into saying something they can spin into click bait. She has absolutely no interest in what he has to say...what a bad interviewer. She's constantly cutting him off and trying her best to corner him. She said she was there to "interview HIM" yet she asks about everything but HIM lol. She keeps asking questions but doesn't let him finish his response. You are supposed to ask a question and save your rebuttal for after the person your interviewing answers the damn question.
Jordan's point on workplace restrictions is huge and a real shame that it got brushed aside.
People naturally find others attractive, attractive people tend to get more attention and advances from the opposite gender, how do we regulate that?
Men tend to be uniform, we wear shirt, tie and long pants, largely the same. A woman can wear a variety of things that would be seen as dressed nicely, including low cut tops that show a little more chest, skirts that show leg, and high heals that pop out the posterior. All of which is appropriate for work. Add make-up to appear more youthful and, intentionally or not, they will invite more eyeballs and attention, and it's hard to just call it men's fault, this is exploiting deep rooted, biological base desires. I do not condone or deny the inappropriate actions of certain men. It's just common knowledge that men are very sensitive to visual cues surrounding women, if a breast is slightly exposed, we notice.
Women might say it's their choice and for men to keep it in their pants, maybe. If a man came in to work with the top buttons undone giving a sneak peak at his pecks, tighter pants showing the curvature of his rear and bulge, I'm certain you would say that he is dressed inappropriately and that the workplace is for work, not to mingle or to swoon the ladies.
I hope this example makes sense, and underlines the complexity of the issue. Humans are animals that want to have sex with each other, so how do we put Men and Women in a room together and regulate their behavior above base biological desires without becoming a tyranny?
No Idea
The problem with him is that he looks at a pattern, and work from the assumption that the pattern and differences are based inherently in nature, and disregard nurture and systematic cultural pressures. There are plenty of studies that show how people treat kids differently based on what gender they believe they are as opposed to what they are. What is doesn’t always have to be.
Next, try some Jonathan Pie.
She's trying to make herself seem much more intelligent than she actually is.