Statistics and Probability requires proper intuitive/analytical elaborations. You've done a fantastic job explaining, particularly about Type-II error, using the right terms and ideas based on the fundamental tenets of the field. It's a simple thing but the idea about drawing the distribution curves stacked vertically atop each other made everything clear. Absolutely brilliant!!!
Clear explanation. My question is how do you communicate this new treatment to a patient? Looking at your drawing the vertical critical line for alpha = 5 % is around 58 on the x axis. Suppose power of the study presented is 80% Now back to the patient : If you take this pill you have a chance of 80% that the desired value, we will measure for your disease will be 58 or higher (which is a good sign) and a 20% chance it will be below 58 (which is not a good sign). However, if we go on with the standard treatment you will have a 95% chance the value stays below 58 (again not a good sign) and a 5 % chance the value will be above 58. Is this interpretation of your explanation correct? Please let me know, thank you.
Statistics and Probability requires proper intuitive/analytical elaborations. You've done a fantastic job explaining, particularly about Type-II error, using the right terms and ideas based on the fundamental tenets of the field. It's a simple thing but the idea about drawing the distribution curves stacked vertically atop each other made everything clear. Absolutely brilliant!!!
and oh yes....a big thank you!
Excellent explaination
The text "and your wrong" is incorrect. It should be "and you're wrong" - which is the shorted version of "you are".
Salute from the heart
Thank you so much for the video
Thank you sir...that helped me a lot ..bless u
Clear explanation.
My question is how do you communicate this new treatment to a patient?
Looking at your drawing the vertical critical line for alpha = 5 % is around 58 on the x axis. Suppose power of the study presented is 80%
Now back to the patient : If you take this pill you have a chance of 80% that the desired value, we will measure for your disease will be 58 or higher (which is a good sign) and a 20% chance it will be below 58 (which is not a good sign). However, if we go on with the standard treatment you will have a 95% chance the value stays below 58 (again not a good sign) and a 5 % chance the value will be above 58. Is this interpretation of your explanation correct?
Please let me know, thank you.
Damn..... You're wrong. Not your wrong.
thank you sir
you're
Complete with spelling errors!!