all of my videos are getting copyright claimed (so here's what I did)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 май 2024
- all of my videos are getting copyright claimed so I came up with a solution for this one to not get claimed.
check out Flight Ukulele's new Reverb shop: tidd.ly/3wh5box
MERCH: elise-ecklund-2.creator-sprin...
INSTAGRAM: / eliseecklund
PATREON: / eliseecklund
Big thanks to my patrons who support me and help make these videos possible! Thank you Tara Lynn Kelly, Ben "Jaguar" Marshall, Matthew Celardo, Christian Andersson, Austin Gazetti, JJBA, aaron, Brenden Conner, Bujju, Joseph Neira, Mar Dacy, Lavender, Mitch, Ray Wood, Joshua Doering, JMCandleClock, Andrew Souther, Martin Fiebig, Jake Shapiro, Tom Knackstedt, Jake Gonzalez, Nathanael Swenson, Jim Klodzen, RuhTheFerret, Donald Blevins, Valérie Trépanier, Jillian Slinger, Michael Eubanks, Zaq, Fallon Alastair, Patrick Streil, Joshua Emmel, and Josh Geiple.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Business inquiries: elise.ecklund@outlook.com 
Видеоклипы
This video is gonna get copyright claimed by Walmart for showing their brand of beans.
probably
@@EliseEcklund nah -- it\s free advertising for them
@@aBachwardsfellow it's a joke xD
Beat me to it.
@@EliseEcklund hi
If a channel gets demonetized, I shouldn’t have to see ads
Facts
RUclips still puts ads regardless. 🤷♀️
@@Starrysofficial I finally ditched expensive Prime and signed up for YT Premium. No more ads for me! I can’t believe I went this long without it
@@Starrysofficial because the ad revenue still gets distributed, it just goes to the copyright owner instead of the content creator. The viewer has nothing to do with it.
The RUclips copyright strike system isn’t designed to make sense, it’s designed to create as little work for RUclips as possible
This is the truest comment I've ever seen
Actually it's designed like this because RUclips is forced to. Playing copyrighted music is illegal. That's just how the copyright system works.
I hate how everyone is blaming RUclips when the actual problem is the copyright system itself.
@@zekiz774RUclips is forced to address copyright infringement - they aren’t required to do it terribly, that’s an option that they _chose_ on purpose _because it’s the least amount of work for them possible._
@@babybirdhome RUclipss Copyright system is pretty sophisticated.
I recommend watching the first few 5 minutes of Tom Scott's "RUclipss Copyright system isn't broken, the world is"
@@babybirdhome the alternative is that they give your information to law firms and sue you for up to a few million dollars for making a cover.
More realistically it's a few thousand dollars, but this still isn't how it should be.
The copyright system was designed in a time where individuals couldn't make anything by themselves without a company behind them. It's designed for companies that have lawyers. Not individuals.
I got flagged once for using a song that was public domain in an acapella recording I did of Christmas music. I appealed and they said "oh, yeah. You're right."
crazy. definitely lots of false claims that happen.
@EliseEcklund That's for sure. I usually don't mind since most of the time the claim is coming from a small Christian label, and I'm fine with that. The ones I don't get are where I get flagged, but I'm clearly talking over the short clip anyway, so you can't even really hear it that clearly.
Oh, well. It is what it is.
Also, my nine-year-old son loves your stuff. He thinks you're weird but funny.
@@EliseEcklundyou're very gifted it s😂hould be your choice to choose how much they get for their copyright ! I'm sure some judges would side with you but they have already money to pay a damn good lawyer I'm sure,, twist words in court and lie about the value of who owns what
The Steamboat Willie character is still copyright on RUclips though it has entered public domain this year.
Bruh saaaaame. I sang a freaking sea shanty that is HUNDREDS of years old and got a copyright claim I had to dispute -.-
I got flagged/claimed once for MY OWN song that I own the copyright to. It was through CDBaby, and it took two years to clear the copyright claim, no idea what ever happened to all the lost revenue, but I certainly never saw any of it.
The youtube equivalent of ambulance chasers launched copyright claims, that's what happened to it.
I mean, youtube is "holding it in escrow".
That is so sad. I’m sorry
They describe themselves as an anti-label so that tracks.
This is why I will never post anything to my channel.
Someone was complaining a while back that the sound of his car engine had a copyright claim made against it.
One solution I've seen someone talk about years ago:
→ Create your own copyrighted song,
→ register it for copyright claims with RUclips
→ and then add it to the into/outro of all your future videos.
→ Then do the copyright-claiming thing, i.e. claim it from yourself.
Then even if other companies also claim the video, you at least get a part of the revenue for this.
That makes sense. Does anyone know if it actually works?
There's some video that explains how this works. Yes you don't get 100% of the value, but gets shared (equally?) between them and you.
@@Soul-Burn But what you do then is create a remix of your theme under another persona and then, as the persona, copyright claim the original, (which is what some copyright trolls actually do, so the tactic is fair game), and then you get two-thirds not half.
I would fear that this may soon end. IE -- an inability to claim yourself
@@DugrozReports then your second account should claim.
I’m here for the baking channel tho ngl 😩
Cool beans. 😂🤣
YESSS I NEED TO KNOW HOW TO MAKE THOSE BEANS!!
next week I hear we'll learn about refried beans
Would watch.
Definitely.
Might cook along as well.
Maybe.
So ... She can 100% make an hour's content with visible branding of beans, but 10 seconds of a song? Math ain't mathing.
Video: *Serious Topic*
Elise: *No Emotion*
It's called _Permanent Sad Face_ and it's no laughing matter!
That's why she scares me
She's got her serious face on for this serious topic.
Emotions are overrated
It's called emotional damage. Her emotions are damaged.
Those record labels being greedy is so infuriating. I know you're not the type to troll your viewers, but I just hoped that this video is a trolling video, it isn't. I'm so sorry to hear this stuff, Elise, I wish them being a big baby towards you doesn't affect your revenue here on RUclips so much. Your parody songs are a lot better than their songs, much more your original ones. They need to stop attacking content creators like you because it's so annoying. Love you and your videos, Elise, keep fighting. Now I think I'm going to stream ‘Is This The End’ because of this video, LOL.
You should get with Rick Beato. He's been trying to fight this craziness too.
The collab I've been waiting for
I feel like every music youtuber is at this point.
@@seronimo__7735 I'm not even a RUclipsr and this is so silly to me.
Using clips of songs for analysis or parody is like free advertising.
The music industry coming down on all of us for copyright is insane.
@@Book-bz8nsnarcissists like Apple recently with its advertising.
KDH said it right, Rick is selling a book while he does it. he plays their music and sells his product that will get him every time.
Therapist: Baking with Elise can’t hurt you, baking with Elise isn’t real
Baking with Elise:
the fact we're still having to deal with the "1% of copyrighted content gets 100% of the video claimed" problem after so many years is fucking wild.
Dang copyright owners
You kids get offa that LAWN!
yep
I love her videos And yeah dang copyright owners
100% BECAUSE SHE USED 10 SECONDS OF A COPYRIGHT SONG SOUNDS LIKE BIG BABY STUDIOS
OK but like it kinda sucks for the company if everyone is violating their copyright. I think it's fair to do a shared system but you can't really blame them.
Actually, the artists rarely shut down revenue for RUclipsrs because the artists are getting screwed on royalties big time as well - which is why they make most of the money touring. it used to be the opposite where the artists' music made the money and the tour was just to support the music (i/e raise awareness of it). I'm speak as a 50+ geezer who follows the pop/rock music industry.
Very true! I don't think the record labels really care about the artists signed to them either. They're more concerned about making a profit for themselves and feeding everybody else the scraps. They say they have the artists best interest in mind by claiming all these videos, but chances of the actual artist seeing that money are probably very slim.
@@EliseEcklundthey only care about their own ass.greetings from Poland :)
It's gotten a little better when T.S. negotiated her contract with Sony, but record labels have teams of people whose job it is to be expert greedy bastards using every exploit they can find.
@@EliseEcklund Exactly. BTW, just discovered your channel and I get a lot of laughs out of it. Keep up the good work.
I have to disagree. The albums promoted the tours back in the 60s, 70s & 80s, and probably still do. We all bought the albums and wore them out waiting for the band to play in or near your city. Radio play was to push the albums back in those days.
I love how there's absolutely no complaining at all. None whatsoever.
We have been dealing with this insanity too. We once made a 12 hour live stream and got copyright claimed for 30 seconds of a song that could be overheard in the background. We didn't even choose to play the song. And instead of taking 30 seconds worth of the video, they decided to take all of the revenue for a 12 hour stream for their 30 seconds of music. I disputed it, and they rejected it. They have all the power, and we have none. It's frustrating.
You could start your very own label house just with your original compositions and crush the system like a grape. 🍇
And then some label will copyright claim the video on behalf of Elise Ecklund, the same person who got claimed.
@@tubbunny It has happened before
@@tubbunny Not if she copyright claims it for herself first.
It's RUclips content ID making most of the "decisions" after IP owners have tinkered with settings they may or may not understand. Tom Scott made a video called "RUclips's copyright system isn't broken. The world's is" which explains the conundrum in detail.
i'll have to check out that video!
As will I, but most likely YT isn't doing due diligence and as a result is actually committing crimes against content creators they demonetize over false copyright claims. Not to mention what they open themselves up to by acting as a publisher instead of a public forum.
@@nrais76yup, parodies can't be claimed for copyright.
@@nrais76 crimes against creators?
...am I dumb, or does this sound like class action lawsuit time?
(I'm probably dumb)
@@klop4228Do you understand that does nothing? No one gets paid except the lawyers, and then they can just shut down the entire system for monetizing?Like do you not understand things dont get better for us if they get in trouble, it actually just makes them more likely to be irrational.
loving the baby hand tbh
i hate the modern concept of copyright SO MUCH
It's run by criminals. Everything like this is run by criminals.
I know, how dare music writers protect their works. What heathens.
Wouldn’t these companies earn more money if people can buy copyright?
Yeah probably because you have no idea how it works or what it even is
@@chriskay1449 the original intent of copyright was for the benefice of the public. It was to force the publishers, who owned a printing press, to pay authors for every sold book instead of a single payment. The original goal of copyright was to give an incentive to authors to write more.
Today, copyright are used by publishers to gain more money, and the authors received less and less.
I heard of random RUclipsrs that are not part of legal businesses who are copyrighting people reusing their videos
Yeah, it happens all the time now
@@alexbodi5526 but they don’t even have the copy-“right” to do that; even for reuploads of SML videos
Nickpick: copyright is automatic and stays with the original artist.
The RUclips copyright strike system is a different thing, and can be gamed.
@@jamesphillips2285let’s hope SuperBam hasn’t gotten to her
@@mezzb though I think Logan copyrighted his videos to get back at RUclips
The song you sang at the end is the opening to Sofia the first, I'm 100% sure
Nope
It was sunny day, 100%
The math really isn't mathing
Am math teacher, can confirm, the math truly isn’t mathing.
The song was “Know Your Rights” by the Clash.
Artists are getting their own original music copyright claimed by RUclips. It's insane. There are channels with full TV shows and sporting events that have gone untouched for decades.I seriously wonder why.
Big Baby Records... I will never buy their stuff again! Those big babies! 😥😥😥
the biggest babies
@@EliseEcklund giant babies??
@@EliseEcklund You can have all the revenue from my surf guitar version of "Kazoo Cotton Candy!": ruclips.net/video/WlZF4-qs6sI/видео.htmlsi=62cyTynMQ-IWBLQ1
no, a beans channel would be good
Thinking about those beans
Well, it _is_ known universally as "The Musical Fruit".
bro my bff's channel is called littlebeans littlebeans... so like...yeah
I love seeing this side of you. Your goofiness is amazing, but I also like insightful videos such as this one, or ones about your husband or sister. How's Eden? Can we have an update video on her? 😀 I'd love to see her again!
Gree-dy sharks. do-do, do-do.
(Second time I've made that reference today.)
I would love to see a class-action lawsuit against these labels for stealing income from videos that they have _no_ actual valid copyright claim. It needs to become unprofitable to abuse the system like they do.
I once made a potential 2cents and yt de-monatized me FOREVER w/o explanation. It was saddening for me. Not offering my original music to be stolen i took it all down.
Some day. Some day...
I'm so glad digitized music has sounded the death knell for major labels.
3.69 cents is crazy
1:44 I felt that one.
I don't use copyrighted music, but sometimes a little snippet of footage from a BBC documentary or a Universal movie. I've had it happen where 5 seconds of a BBC documentary footage in the last third of a video, led to the entire 20-minute video getting claimed.
But here's the kicker: The claim didn't happen until a week after the video was uploaded. YT cleared the video on upload with no copyright issues - if it had told me right away it would get claimed, I would have cut the clip. The video was up a full week without issue and was performing well. Then all of a sudden: copyright claim. All earnings go to the BBC. It was almost like they did it purpose by claiming it a week later, not giving me the option to cut the clip. I cut the clip *after* the claim, but the money from the first week (i.e. the time when videos make the most money) still went to the BBC. It's insane.
One of my videos was demonetized due to a claim that I was using copyrighted material.
I watched the segment of my video the claim came from...
It was literally nothing but my 7 Days to Die character squatting on top of a column of wooden blocks, at night, in the wasteland.
My character was doing *literally nothing* because it was from a live stream, and on a server, so I couldn't pause - so I just left my character hiding on top of the blocks while I left the room to use the restroom.
The *only* sound, was *the sound of blowing wind*.
So I tracked down what the claim was supposed to be for...
The copyrighted material I was *supposedly using*, was from a music video.
I'd never heard of the band, or the song, and it wasn't even in any language I could understand.
But I watched the whole thing, I think it was over 5 minutes, and there was NOTHING even remotely related to what was in my video, until...
During the last 10-15 seconds of the video, the music fades out, till all you can hear...
Is *the sound of blowing wind*...
They feel like they own the rights to *the sound of freaking wind* :|
So I go to youtube's built in thingy to try and say this is an error...
But there's a problem, because the only way to proceed, was through a mulitple-choice system, and *they didn't HAVE* a selection for "Neither I, nor the claimant, hold a copyright for this material".
They had, if I remember right, just 3 choices.
It was, like, "I have changed the material enough to claim it as my own work".
Well... It's the f@cking wind. I didn't change anything. I don't own it. NOBODY owns the sound of wind.
Or... Something like I own the copyright for the material in question
Hey, Elise, I'm a huge fan!!! I love your stuff; you make me laugh so hard!! I had one question for you, which video and song editor software do you like to use?
uH Oh - ThIs VIdeEo haS BeeN BloCKed BY BiG BaBy RecOrdS
How very sad indeed ☹️
As long as you buy the royalty for a song you're using, you can earn more money using it.
That doesn't stop the automatic claiming system.
Eh, even music games like Just Dance from Ubisoft, who bought the license, got their tailers of their games copyright claimed on their own youtube channel
@AllyMind5Star Sweet summer child…
Your deadpan delivery really worked for this video.
This is the reason why some RUclipsrs don't post their drum/guitar covers anymore
This policy is why I won't even post *original* work to my channel.
You've got a way to fight back: Be a published musician. CDBaby makes this trivial. Record a hundred short terrible songs, format them into albums, publish them to CDBaby, and use them opportunistically in your videos, as bumpers, as intros, as backing audio. Use two or three or five per video. Then, tell CDBaby to automatically file ContentID claims on your behalf as an artist, against your RUclips channel. RUclips will split the revenue proceeds between ContentID claims. That means you get to do revenue sharing on every single video that isn't summarily executed.
There's an example above of a creator saying his own music was copyright struck by CDBaby and it took him years to get it dealt with and he lost all the revenue. So no, CDBaby are part of the problem not the solution.
YES, we would watch your baking videos 100%
0:54 that’s my birthday
Happy late birthday!❤
@@ImSugarDuhty!
Rly me too
Happy birthday!
Cool but nobody asked you
sorry to hear that sorry for you keep it up
*Claiming❎*
*Stealing ✅*
damn, I've never seen Elise this angry
Record labels are huge corporations of lawyers who make money from copywriting royalties. Sometimes, though, occasionally they do get to record music.
the share delay thing is about accounting and youtube making sure to scrape 90% of your income off whereas they can't take any of the income the big company is supposed to get
always also file claim on your own videos and share with yourself
I used to do youtube back in the good ol days but then a record label started claiming my videos that had ZERO MUSIC. I was just talking over no sound and youtube just punished me and blocked all my videos. Their word against mine. And my channel actually got 2 strikes over it. I tried contesting it but they just threatened to go legal and youtube was too stupid or cowardly or both to fight it. After that I threw my hands up in the air. I know i was not doing anything wrong. If they went legal a judge would throw that out so fast. You can’t copyright my voice! But it didn’t matter and I stopped doing videos after that.
I think that even if you just hum/whistle some artists song and post it, you can be copyrighted. Music copyright is broken into the score or notes and the instruments. So playing someone elses music even on your instrument is copyright. Playing someone elses cover of a no longer copyrighted piece is still copyright infringement. For example classical Bach is not copyright due to the composition being over 100 years old, but if you record and post an orchestra playing it, then their rendition of the piece IS copyright. You CAN play Bach on your instrument(s) copyright free as long as it is your own arrangement.
1:46 THE FRICKIN MATH REALLY ISNT MATHING
That’s like what my classmates always says: my brain isn’t braining😂
I got a copyright on a song that wasnt even used in a video or sounded like the song that was in the video, I appealed it, they denied the appeal. Meanwhile, I got one friend that can't upload his own music because of "copyright claims." I got another friend that wasn't allowed to upload his own music to Facebook because of "copyright claims."
Dang
I used to make original sample loops and licensed them as public domain. They ended up in some mainstream music, then I got a copyright claim against my own creations. That's when I gave up.
Several years ago, YT tried to claim that I violated a copyright in a video I made but I never heard anything back from them after I explained that Mozart had expired over 200 years ago. 😢
I recognized that song at the end, it's "so bad, I'm so bad, I'm bad to the bone, ba ba ba ba ba bad".
I thought Elise was going to announce her brand new subscription-based streaming platform.
I once got a copyright claim on a lets-play, for sound that the final boss makes. The game came out two years before the song that was claimed. The artists sampled the sound. When I challenged it with this incontrovertible evidence that they had no valid claim, they denied the appeal and upheld the claim. I had to get in touch with them outside RUclips and tell them that I was going to notify the game creators of the (supposed) theft.
Once a livesteam gamer from New Zealand that I sometimes followed said he was thinking about doing a Fallout 4 series. His channel has all of his old livestream VODs from gaming sessions with other games, but there is nothing new to be seen on his RUclips channel for several months. Maybe he suddenly got tired of gaming, but more likely he got into some sort of copyright trouble. TheFallout 4 videogame a lot of music from more than 50 years ago, but music copyright lasts for about 100 years, so if the music companies want to, they probably have ways in case of music copyright violations to freeze a RUclips channel for a very long time without actually making the RUclips channel and its old content actually vanish.
Elise, I love your dominating brand of sarcasm. As a connoisseur of fine sarcasm, I'm gratified to witness a professional of the art. Thank you.
Parody is definitely a fair use so you can dispute that. If it's just a background song then yes, that's hard to dispute.
Yes I agree that parody is fair use, but if I try to dispute it there's a good chance I would lose because it's decided by the copyright owner and of course they're going to decide in their favor. And if I dispute I do believe there is a chance they could copyright strike me if they don't like the fact that I disputed, but I might be wrong.
0:55 well... 69 cents was quite exact. 💀
RUclips justice: You are guilty and will be punished until you prove your innocence. It's backwards.
Nothing new... Stay strong, a loooot of people love what you do :)
LoL that was a nice end. Didn't know the record labels held the revenue for just using a part of their song for some part in the video... Seems very sus...
I used to work next to a bar that had live music on Wednesdays. There was a band so bad that I thought they were doing original music until I finally recognized they were singing Nickelback lyrics. So I think it's possible.
No music is the best solution. Even then, some people are getting shut down.
Stunning and brave content.
I hope that Great Value Black Beans won't claim this
they just might
A lot of corporate America, including the record companies uses a Net “X” for their accounts payable. The most common are Net 30, 60, or 90. It means they share revenue with you the check day before 30, 60, or 90 days after they receive it. Check day is the day the “checks” for the week would be printed. It’s been a while since I was in Corporate America, but I suspect there is still a check day even if the check is digital. Corporations hate change.
i remember the saga of "bittersweet symphony"" back in the day, and the lesson about copyright lawyers
I got a notification from RUclips saying one of my videos includes something with copyright and i got a notification of this video at the same time😅😂😊
sounds about right
@@EliseEcklund wdym (thanks for responding to my comment😊 )
@@Time_for_adamit's quite obvious what she means and she is sarcastic as she is 110 % of the time
Lamp
Lamp 😢
Thre ending cracked me up! Didn't see it coming.
It's funny how sometimes songs get claimed that entered public domain or labels claim songs (or get those songs claimed) that ARE NOT the ones in videos.
It's frustrating.
Wow well either way I still enjoy your videos
thank you!
Me too , I enjoy her videos as much as eating $#!T or as much as running out of water in the Sahara Desert or as much as getting kicked in the Nutz by a girl with combat boots.
I think the easiest solution is for you to write all of the hit songs yourself, that way you would own the copyrights.
now that's what I call the best move
@@EliseEcklund ❤️
@@EliseEcklund yeah! Like you GO girl! It's about time you launched your career as a songwriter -- and you have plenty of spunk and sass to do it -- no doubt about it!
Give us a list of you fave videos in a playlist: “My It’s All Me Playlist of Just My Stuff that I don’t have to share” we are looking forward to that playlist
In my over 20 years of working on TV / RUclips I learned to stay away from copyrighted music and any sports where money is involved (The companies managing these rights are even worse than the record label)
Isn’t what you do under fair use? By editing changing the song and producing this video is no longer under music it is under visual contact. I could be wrong but I hope things get better :(((
yeah there is definitely the argument of fair use for parodies and covers because I'm reinventing the song. But sadly the system doesn't really care to take fair use into mind and they can still claim 100% of revenue if they want.
@@EliseEcklund I've noticed several instances in which some music channels just change one or two notes in the melody -- sounds a li'l dorky, but I wonder if that gets them a pass.
I’d like to watch your cooking videos.
She likes half of the comments wtf is she reading them all ? I really hope that she doesn't read mine hahahahaha then again she probably likes to be trolled since she loves trolling so much.
Elise, you tried splitting the song in vocals, drums, bass & others, then lowering or erasing "others"? Each year in Eurovision I have CR issues with the french entry, and I edit the song slightly like that, and they never copyrighted me again. Other option is erase an instrument, and put some echo o reverb in the rest of the song. YT algorithm never catches the trick, and if the label are manually looking for coincidences with YT's copyright analyzer, will be harder for them to find your songs, as it were edited. I know, the new song doesn't sound exactly like the original, but is quite similar.
Yeah, the song is Somebaaaa by Elise Ecklund
I got the beans, now what?
😆
Now put them in your azz
Ur my favorite RUclipsr
What do you like about her exactly ?
@@Solonas-gv8ib She's funny and makes good, interesting videos. Why, do you not like her?
@@PeppaCanRoastU Well... Depends how you define "funny" because most of her videos are really dumb as hell. I guess some people with low standards and bad sense of humour will laugh with them though yes ? The only time I laughed with one of her videos was when she showed a picture of her and her husband and said if you need clarification that's my husband and that's me. Which is something I would say. Like I would see a picture with a man wearing a blue shit together with a black dog and I would say "Are you the one wearing black or the one wearing blue ?" Hahahahaha sounds like that she copied my joke. I just don't like that her videos are such bad troll videos and yet she has almost 5 million followers wth ?!
@@PeppaCanRoastU Btw I meant to say "blue shirt" ... Hahahahaha this has happened before I hate it when I type "shirt" wrong...
@@Solonas-gv8ib LOL
What??? That's messed up, you don't deserve this. You are an amazing content creator, you make the holy land of RUclips even more holy.
On the up side you can now sing happy birthday beyond your heart's desire
i love that happy birthday is public domain
@@EliseEcklund
Crazy to think the music industry thought it made good business sense to have legal teams consider copyright litigation for singing happy birthday.... facepalm
@@EliseEcklund and not to mention, you could sing happy birthday while dressed as Steamboat Willie Mickey
FIRSTTT!! Hi Elise you are my favourite RUclipsr! You are so funny and you have the prettiest name💗💗
i was first
@@omg_joachimyt Cool
Hi
I’m sorry that these labels are giving you a hard time! Hopefully this all gets better soon! 🙏
0:32 Look at her lil hand omg soo cute! 😍
You know what annoys me..? If a famous youtuber uploads. 1 sec later a billion ppl go in the comments "FIRSTTT" Or "First!"
Ong
yea its mostly kids looking for attention, its even funnier when they start arguing with eachother.
Fr
You combat them by saying “Blue shell.”
Frr
Lol. You go girl. make original and keep the loot. You deserve it!!
Elise love the video. Nothing wrong with a straight honest video. If it embarrasses someone, then they need to correct what they are doing wrong.--Nothing wrong with a parody or interpretation of a song, it raises awareness of the famous or original version, so more people check it out and the original creators gain from more plays that would not otherwise have happened
SO informative, and it was beautifully executed without complaining! :)
The barbie hand😭😭
People who didn’t come from TikTok are allowed to like this
Shut up
She has a Tik Tok?!!
nobody came from tiktok
shut up
I didn’t even know she had TikTok
Record labels are notorious for not paying artists.
Record labels, man. What irks me the most is that not only to they lay claim to particular music being used, but they also seem to think that they have monopoly on music as an art form in general. Bloodsuckers.
*⬇️Dislike Button For The Copyright Claimers*
Well, don't worry. You can always get the real job
For sure, I could always get another job! But it also stinks to see huge corporations taking advantage of individuals. This is a problem far beyond just myself so I think it's important to talk about it.
@@EliseEcklund yeah, that's true. Anyway, thanks for the heart. Love your channel
YT shouldn't be blocking or demoning any parody videos, period. They're not in breach of any copywrite laws.
I got a copy strike on TikTok when I made a video of me playing a random thing on my keyboard that the system thought was something else... I was literally making it up as I went...
1