VERY GOOD TEACHING. I ACTUALLY UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU WERE DESCRIBING AND IT CLEARED MANY POINTS OF CONFUSION IN THW FIRST CHAPTER. VERY VERY EXCITING! GOD MADE THE BACKDROP FIRST THEN HE PLACED THE PLANET. THE HOME THEN THE GARDEN OF GODS HOME IN ITS PLACE. NO CHAOS!!! JUST NEEDED TO BE COMPLETED,FINISHED. THE ENERGY WAS LIGHT SHINING ON THE EARTH TO EXHIBIT THE TIME OF ONE DAY. ONE ROTATION. EXCELLENT LECTURE. PRAISE THE LORD.
@@professorneturman2249 your religion does not have an answer huh? How about this, who does evolution say came first, male or female? Male and female reproductive organs are so diametrically opposite of each other that neither could have evolved from the other? Yet neither could have came into existence without the other? Ill wait for evolutions answer?
I was thinking the same thing. LOL I love when people, who are Hebrew or Greek grammar nerds, start to interpret the text. The Hebrew language is very precise, and very vivid. It is very different from our English language. I attempted to learn Hebrew at one point, and it gave me an extreme headache. It is very different from our own language, and much more precise. It isn't easy to learn. If you follow the proper grammar rules in Hebrew, it seems to back itself up so that you can't mess up the meaning. It is very exact, so when in doubt about a verse in the bible then go to the Hebrew or Greek that it was originally written in. It will tell you for sure what it is saying. This presentation brought it out beautifully. A shout out, with much admiration, for this man taking the time to become proficient in this language. It isn't an easy accomplishment. I understand , with compassion, when he said that his class groaned with the assignment from their professor. LOL
@@bethfurry7461 chuck is a wealth of information. he made me to not doubt the bible at all. the best thing about chuck is how he can see "TYPES OF" for example a story in the old testament will have similar parrallels to the new testament. i find such foreknowledge in the bible beyond human imagination.
Doug, I keep coming back and watching this over and over. I can’t get enough. You’re like an orchestra leader, putting God‘s word to music with your hand, gestures. Bravo may God keep blessing you
This was unbelievably good. I imagined the two Hebrews discussing the one individual referenced in the hieroglyphic and then looking to God for their deliverance, and I marveled that God has seen fit to graft me into the family of faith, the family of Abraham.
I believe Time is the container that space and matter are able to exist and move. Everything is effected by time, most creations by mankind have timing engineered into it, if not effected by it. May God bless you and all here through the knowledge of the Son.
Mr Petrovich is, like the late Chuck Missler, an incredibly good teacher. His explanations for both verse 3 (about the 'light') and verse 5 (rotation of earth giving us our 24 hr day) are superb. Why is this so difficult for people to understand Hebrew is complex but very explicit. This also completely supports young Earth creation. Praise God!
Lots of mental gymnastics going on here, shoe horning Heliocentic theory into Biblical text. Genesis literally speaks of at least two light sources, exactly what we experience. Ambient light is parallel light, direct sun light is divergent. Test it for youself.
@@deanfloyd8931 We have been given a brain and common sense and through those, we have discovered we live on a planet orbited by a moon and both orbiting a sun. Yes, heliocentric. Two light sources: moon for night, sun for day. Pretty straightforward.
@@joeboudreault2226Our frame of reference is given to us the early childhood conditioning. Unfortunately, the typical bible student will automatically filter the Word of God thru the sieve of a previously indoctrinated world view. Reading and studying minus the pre conditioning changes the perception totally...it just not easy to turn off all the Scientism, it is the world religion, all holy books must comply with what it dictates. Sadly the so called church has been swept away also.
@@deanfloyd8931 Some truth here I think, Dean. When I study the Bible I make sure that I do not allow the secular world's conditioning to affect me. I pray and ask for the assistance of the Holy Spirit... that's how I interpret scripture; not by something I was taught in childhood or early life ... the Holy Spirit is my teacher, not presumptions from away back.
@@joeboudreault2226 Two questions that we should ask ourselves from time to time: Have I been brainwashed? Are my thoughts my own? Personally, I answer a resounding "yes" to the first. Once established, "no" most likely to be the correct answer to the second. Damage control has commenced
LISTEN, I have been studying your interests from the age of 4, and now at the age of 72 have found your work. Wonderful. I tell people I found the Bible because of my love of the valley of the Kings. That lead me on to history, Jacob and Moses then Isaiah to the new testament. Now I am studying Hebrew. I am excited that I am not a fish out of water and grateful to watch you deliver most of your life's work. Thank you for being recorded you never know where your knowledge goes. Pebbles in a pond and all that. Gillie
The probably right reading of Genesis 1-3 from the JPS translation: When God began to create heaven and earth - the earth being unformed and void, with darkness over the surface of the deep and a wind from God sweeping over the water - God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light.
Thank you Doug for your accuracy and also letting the word out. That we can stand on God‘s word! It’s not millions of years or billions of years of creation It’s six days 24 hour days I’m glad that I found you thank you for being steadfast in your faith
Come on fella, you know it's not six days. I'm not insulting your faith but parts of the Bible down through the ages have fallen foul of mistakes, spelling, copying, translation mistakes. The thing about Moses having horns, that was a translation error. Originally the word meant "shining" or "radiant". It was mistranslation & was copied as "horns" & now we see paintings with Moses sporting a pair of horns. The whole of Creation was not achieved in six days. Just saying.🙂
It is good that you guys are revealing the truth about what is being dug up & why the landscape of the earth & ocean floors look like they do. May the motivation for doing these things always be to bring glory to HIM who created us in HIS image & then came in the flesh to pay the price w/HIS body & blood on the cross so that we who believe could be redeemed & have eternal life w/HIM forever. Jesus Christ The Unique Son of God. HE is returning to take us home soon. TY IGH.
Romans Chap 1; "What is revealed is God's anger from heaven against all the godlessness & wickedness of people who in their wickedness Willingly Suppress the truth, because what is known about God is plain to them. For ever since the creation of the universe HIS invisible qualities both HIS eternal power & HIS divine nature have been clearly seen because they can be understood from what HE has made. Therefore they have no excuse", etc. etc. (1st Chap. v. 1-32 of Romans inspired by God & written 2000 yrs ago, reads like TODAY'S news, & this world hates HIS Word)
This has helped my understanding of certain concepts God has been showing me progressively in His Word. Thank you so much for allowing God to teach you and use you Dr.Petrovich.
This segment has opened my eyes. Keep walking that straight path!! I also enjoyed the video you have on the tower of babble expansion! Thanks for sharing! Shalom!
Great presentation, thank you for sharing. I would posit that by the text the first thing God created was time. This is implied in the words “In/beginning”.
Within the first week God made day and night, lights for both. Thus He created time. When you see what a day and a night is made from there's every hour, every minute etc within it. In Jesus name He reveals this to you all as you read scripture too. His wisdom, knowledge, understanding and revelation. Thank you Jesus praise God 🙏🕊️💕🔥🙏
@@AbrahamBarberi Hmm...valid point. What if within the first second, God created the sub-atomic particles and the sub-atomic time, something like in the secular standard model? E.g.: at say 10^-43 second. I think both the Bible and secularists may agree that there were instant creations or formations (evolutions according to the secularists) - when the 4 forces of nature separated themselves from an initial energy symmetry. As a biblical creationist this application could fit into Gen 1:2-3, in the first part of 1 day of God's creation.
Wouldn't it be fair to say that eternity is "time" immeasurable? / Perhaps "in beginning" introduces "measurable time", since time is only relevant to the finite. / I believe that time (and everything else) has always existed in the mind of God, therefore, it always existed.
@@wayward54 Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. 6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. There's more to that chapter of what God made in the beginning of the earth, life, creations, the first week. Everything began then and it's a great book; the whole gospel is. Praise God thank you Jesus 🙏
I came to be Born Again through Supernatural means, afterward came the study of The Bible (With a slow learning of Hebrew) and the authentication that The scriptures confirm that God is who he says he is as a matter of fact whether through free will this is accepted. I see many of the comments here as intellectual jousting(Pride on display) I love the continuity of The Hebrew in this presentation especially the “He who is” which is exactly what The Lord Jesus (Yeshua) stated in John when he flatly proclaimed to the Pharisees challenging HIS authority and origin “ Before Abraham was I AM” confirming he was the voice of the burning bush...... with no beginning or end YHVH the Tetragrammaton the Ayeh Asher Ayeh . Jesus stated Moses wrote those books more than once and also confirmed other prophets wrote scripture as moved by The Holy Spirit ie(Daniel and Isaiah). Great presentation and blessed by it.
Newton was all that and a bag of chips when it came to gravity, forces, and optics. But... he believed in alchemy, was gay, and thought his biggest achievement was staying a virgin regarding women. Bit of a nutter (seems to be common with those of higher mental function).
@@-kepha8828 your opinion does not change the statement. You're the usual culprit that cannot refute what anyone says, then you attempt to attack the person. Be gone dullard
@@-kepha8828 have you ever heard of the pot calling the kettle black? Thinking that 200 billion trillion stars came from a dot of nothing is a great religious belief to have when calling me out for mine.
The idea regarding (19:00) elohim is one issue that is in question since elohim refers to spirit beings and not absolute to the trinity. This difference in how that term is interpreted and applied can be found in teaching by Dr. Michael Heiser and Dr. Tim Mackie and others. Their teaching on elohim and how it is used throughout the Bible provides clarity.
I would suggest that "one day" was referring to the order of how the day occurs, evening then morning. This way, the pattern is in harmony with the rest of scripture according to how YHWH ordained keeping time, especially for His set apart feasts. The suggestion you provided about the earth's spinning axis does not keep in harmony with the rest of scripture that speaks about the earth being fixed and immovable. The Light and Darkness separation is the knowledge of "good" and "evil" which He separated because only Light [goodness] is in the heavens dwelling with Him. Eve was later tempted by the same knowledge and ate of its fruit. The "good" eat manna from heaven. Eating His Word means to internalize it. His Word is layered with literal and allegorical synonyms. This is how the imagery is kept relevant while at the same time historically accurate. His ways [light] will always win out when measured up to the ways of the world [dark]. There is mention of a new heaven and earth coming, one that He brings to us. Like you said, and I agree with, we are the main stage. A few verses to consider Psalm 104:5, 33:9, 93:1, 96:10, 119:89-90 1 Chron 16:30 Isaiah 14:7, 45:18, 40:22 Zechariah 1:11 Job 26:7, 26:10 Proverbs 8:28 2 Peter 3:5 Rev 7:1 I think you do a great deal of study and hard work that does not go unnoticed. But your argument for this discussion does little to sway the mindset of a berean that factors in every single detailed verse in order to view the whole picture in harmony. There are several examples where we are warned against using the knowledge of the fallen transgressed state of mankind to fit into the Wisdom of the Most High. Tread carefully and study more thoroughly the philosophy behind the knowledge you present. Does it harmonize with the entire Bible from beginning to end? Why would YHWH use specific forms of words for Moshe to record if He meant it to be viewed in their period of time mindset? Where did the great ancient thinkers get their epiphanies? Why were the giants referred to as "mighty, of old, men of renown?" What did the sons of God [Watchers] teach mankind? Who and how were the monolithic structures built? Why do we find the pyramid structure on every continent? Why does YHWH say not to replicate what is in Heaven? Why is the pyramid structure used for conceptual ideologies, psychology, governments, religions, occult philosophy, etc.? It all connects to that first day created and snowballs into what we witness in our time. Free will is a brilliant concept, but those who chose the Dark over Light [transgression of YHWH's righteous laws] will not find their dwelling place with Him. And when transgression is finally abolished after the second advent during the second death, the Dark consciousness will cease existence forever and ever.
49:20 - This is interesting if you consider that what we know of as "the speed of light" is a convention; exclusively the 2-way (round-trip) speed of light, halved. And that it is impossible to conduct any experiment to measure the one-way speed of light. Time is also not a constant (proven), and so I wonder if this also suggests time dialation relative to the beginning.
Thanks Dr Petrovich. At least one Academic that believe the Bible to be true. You are one in a million. God will bless you. I know what a battle it is to be surrounded by professionals that deliberately choose to reject the world of God. Every word of the Bible is true and authorised by God's Holy Spirit. With that view point history is quite, and amazingly enough so also is our future.
God is the genuine and sole author of this book we call the Bible. Because only one who knows the end from the beginning could have foretold those things that came to pass, exactly as the prophets had predicted!
You were probably looking in the children’s section. There are plenty of good books on astronomy in the adult section. Why don’t you try looking there.
The plurality of "elohim" does not inherently indicate pluriunity. I'm also not saying it disproves it, but the verbs are conjugated as singular, not plural. The Gen. 1:26 "let us make" is an exception, but similar exceptions exist for human characters elsewhere in the bible, and a proposal to take action is a common theme among them (we even sometimes do so in English, e.g. "Give us a chance," "Let's not".) "And God SAID" immediately before it beginning the verse is also singular. It's important to understand that Biblical Hebrew often uses the "majestic plural" in many contexts, including even using the very same word "elohim" referring to a singular, influential human being ("mighty one" or "judge"). This is roughly equivalent to the "royal 'We'" used by British monarchs to refer to their individual selves. Many other languages utilize the same concept, and only a few centuries ago it was integral to everyday English based on age & social status. I'm disappointed the presenter was not upfront about this, because he should know.
Doug, my wife and I have listened to about 6 of your lectures, including this one twice. Great material and presentation. I'd like to hear you elaborate more on the creation of the stars. It was not clear to me as to whether or not you were suggesting that the stars were separate creations, or were made from existing matter. You mentioned a divine fire works display. You may be familiar with both Jason Lisle and Spike Psaris, both astrophysicists. Both men reject the big bang theory. I would highly recommend you read pages 79 - 81 of Jason Lisle's book, "Taking Back Astronomy". He gives one of the best arguments against the big bang theory; the absence of antimatter in the universe. I believe the stars were individual creations, certainly none we know of as complex as earth, but seeing the complexity and diversity of stars and planets, I believe the stars / planets were most likely individual creations, just like angels are all individual creations, not a race like with men. Both men have lectures on youtube; just type their name in the youtube search bar.
When scripture describes the Spirit “hovering” over the waters of the deep, it can also be translated “vibrating”. Investigate “sonoluminescence” which also creates light in water from vibration-which is closer to the biblical account, that the Holy Spirit vibrated over the waters of the deep and created light.
Regarding Genesis 1:5: "And there was evening and there was morning, one day" you can find this in the Chumash, Stone edition, Torah. Thanks for a great lesson
🤔 Elohim, have you considered our Heavenly Father and the heavenly host? Who were the “host” if not the angels/sons of God(children in celestial/spiritual body) 1 Cor 15; 2 Cor 5: Job 38-40
More like "day one," considering the other days of the creation week use the same formula. "Two day," "three day," etc. really don't make any sense as consistent parsing of that syntax.
I’m at 14:37 in this video, truly stunned at the “vaccinated terminology” used when the Israelites entered into the Lands of Canaan. There is a list of 7 “ites” Amorites being one, that were to be utterly destroyed and the LORD even gives the reasons why, it was due to their wickedness and that if not destroyed, their customs, idolatry, passing their children in the fire, etc would become a snare among the Israelites.
28:14 And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed. Genesis
You should use a modern translation, because the KJV is both out of date in its manuscript scholarship, and uses a form of English that is 500 years old and which is getting harder to understand for modern speakers of the language.
@@senatorjosephmccarthy2720 Your nom de guerre says a lot about you. The King James is a poor translation because it relies on later and fewer manuscripts, and the English language has evolved away from the King James.
“And all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution. But evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived.”2 Timothy 3:12,13
Unless I'm missing something in the graphic on the screen at the 10:00 minute mark, it appears that a single letter "tau" is doing "double duty" for the two separate words: snt timhn ("a year of astonishment"). Would this be common in these ancient inscriptions for a single letter to be a part of two separate words? Also, would the astonishment be viewed as "because of the Lady" or "upon the Lady"?
Excellent presentation. My only concern is that we avoid the tendency to fill in details where we really have no information. For example, I prefer Faulkner's view over Hugh Ross regarding light travel, but it's unprovable. So I just how we tread lightly.
38:25 time - Doug, it’s properly “out” and not “up”. The enormity of the earth leads us to forget to take all dimensions in context with one another. There really isn’t “up and down.” It’s “in and out”; towards the center of (dominant) mass, and away from it. I hope I’m making sense.
@james welsh. James, I am sort of with you on this and I picked that up as well. I don’t have the specifics yet ironed out but I think I know where you are heading. I have had the idea of what your “center of (dominant) mass” was and it contained all the light that was needed perspectively because there was going to be a separation of light and dark before the waters below. The solid crust would be formed to separate the plasma “light” core from the liquid surface, during the formation of the eventual round form, magnetic poles and the eventual magnetic field. I don’t think there had to be a “up or down” to create a evening and a morning, I think that came later. We know you can have evening and morning like in the polar regions without the absence or presence of the day 4 “greater light” and “lesser light”. I have had this idea for a while so I’m not sure that is what your thoughts are as well and I’m not eloquent or well versed enough to explain it all, but if I’m reading you wrong then let me know. But thanks for pointing that out from a otherwise awesome teaching.
The World English Bible (WEB) is a public domain version. It translates Gen 1:5 correctly as "There was evening and there was morning, one day" rather than "day one" or "first day." Likewise, the Context Group Version (CGV) Bible and Rotherham Emphasized Bible also have "one day" too.
The validity of Holy Scripture is infallible. Our LORD JESUS Himself appeared to Moses, Moses as Abraham was considered to be God's friend. Some "Scholars" will seek to talk out of the mouth of the tempter due to their own unbelief. Thank you for sharing. Praise our Good LORD CHRIST JESUS!
In listening to this, an intriguing question arose: Is it possible that there a time division between Gen. 1:2 and Gen. 1:3? The idea of "one day" seems to be starting with the creation of light and not necessarily with "in beginning", as though the artist painted the basic background color, paused and then began painting light on it, finishing the painting in seven literal days though having started the very general framework before them. I am definitely not advocating that anything but stasis was going on in the prelude to light and the question can be fairly asked of the idea, "Why would God pause?" I don't know why He would. But if He did, it might entertain some interesting thoughts on some of the old age/new age of the earth conundrums. As I said though, this could NOT challenge the idea of a very literal 6 day creation of everything from light to Adam if one uses the Bible as a source, which I do.
I dont know if you are right or wrong..I have my opinion..but, let’s put that away for a second Such a beautiful analogy..you are obviously an artist or at least you have an artists soul I never considered that possibility before
@@mccalltrader Before seeing this video, the idea had not occurred to me either. That's one of the fun things about these videos and the thoughts and connections they provoke. As to art, the closest I've come was in metal sculpture many, many years ago. Most of my life has been spent in construction as a general contractor. No I drive a bus for a private Christian school...
The question is really moot, and here's why. Between the moment when Gᴏᴅ created the Earth and the moment Gᴏᴅ said, "Let there be light," nothing happened except the Spirit of Gᴏᴅ hovering. Nothing. Certainly no Grand Canyon formed because there was no land. Neither were fossils formed because there were no creatures. I suppose radioactive atomic elements could decay but that's about all that could happen.
Dear sir, I don’t suppose you read any comments but I have a question. I don’t know anything about the zodiac for some are simply look at the heavens from England and see only these obvious constellations. Using the Greek names: - Orion, Cassiopeia, Cygnus the swan, The plough, or the big dipper, you might call it. Orion clearly has the number three and the number seven in it, and it is the most glorious constellation surrounded by the brightest stars. The plough essentially has seven points in it as well, and it points to the one star but never moves in the sky the polestar. I would prefer to call it a scroll because it looks like a scroll, and once again I think a number seven is in essentially its construction. And sickness is obviously across and Cassiopeia. It’s a zigzag obviously the sign of a snake so there are two symbols of salvation right there; Moses lifted up a snake for salvation, and Jesus was lifted up on a cross. So my question is, although I probably don’t read these Linx, what do you know what the Hebrew names for these constellations are please?
@NEAR TERM EXTINCTION - HUMAN It's a great read, and it almost rarely mentioned the serpent That Serpent has a function attached to it. That would be Accuser. In Job the Serpent was sent to accuse him of not having faith in God. The friends of Job were all speaking with the tongue of the Accuser and had rebelled from God. This "Serpent" is capable of talking through a person that allows themselves to rebel against God. Satan the Serpent was speaking thoughts and Peter spoke them to Yeshua when He was preparing for the Cross. Peter was rebuked and Satan left Peter for a time. It is possible to possessed by a nother spirit other than the Holy Spirit. Many people are presenting that false devil into their comments lately. In the New Testament, Satan and his demons have the power to enter and possess people; this is what is said and did happen to Judas (Luke 22:3; John 13:27; cf. Mark 5:12-13; Luke 8:30-32). And yet more than half of the Saducees and some.ofnthe Pharisees were also possessed, and yet appeared to be holy men. Many people that entertain people for a living admit they take on spirits. Denzel Washington for example. Acting is the career of manifesting a different spirit other than oneself and create a false environment outwardly. It's called a "Show" So one is going to have to reflect on what it is they believe, when one's own worldly peers believe in spirits and channel them. Which the Bible speaks of, the wicked of the world admit to this, and one mocks it's existence. Many musicians admit to selling their soul to this very same Satan, otherwise known as lucipher bit that is merely a Latin title. It's not the name. Neither is Satan. Neither is the devil. These are all titles. Originally in the Hebrew word for him is Haylel.
@NEAR TERM EXTINCTION - HUMAN When a person is walking as YHVH intends, he/she cannot be insulted/offended. Magic is part of Paganism and has nothing to do with YHVH or those who walk in all of His ways. John 1:12-13 12 But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: 13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. John 14:15-17 15 “If you love Me, keep My commandments. 16 And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever- 17 the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him; but you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you. John 14:20-21 20 At that day you will know that I am in My Father, and you in Me, and I in you. 21 He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him.” John 14:23-24 23 Jesus answered and said to him, “If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him. 24 He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine but the Father’s who sent Me. All have the choice to follow Yashua Messiah and walk through that door to YHVH. We can choose to be grafted in (adopted) through faith. YHVH forces no one. Those who choose and obey His Commands indeed to have something that those who deny Him and choose to walk as the world walks, do not have. They have Him abiding within us as the Holy (set apart) spirit. It is not ‘magic’ nor is it fantasy. You cannot accept this because you do not know Him (relational). He is Truth, Light, and Life. As long as you breath, you can choose which path to follow. Choose wisely. One path leads to death and the other to eternal life. Shalom (peace)
6:25 Jesus attests to Moses as the writer. John 5:46-47 "If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?"
@@TonyTigerTonyTiger The entire book of Genesis .. which clearly reveals God is a Father, Son, & Spirit ... the Messiah is the "only begotten Son" of God sent by his Father to be sin sacrifice that will satisfy God's just nature to punish all who sin ... and ... God's Chosen People are simply People of Faith. The first Chapter of Genesis clearly states ... God is plural & singular .. and at least a Father(God Head) and a Spirit. Let us make Man our image. God( singular & plural) is male ... and from Man came Woman ... so logically from a Patriarchal God, from a Father comes his only begotten Son. The Binding of Issac ... is actually a Messianic Prophecy ... and confirms God will provide the sacrifice ... that will satisfy God's just nature to punish all who sin. You know he book. And you know he chapter and verses. But since you do not believe what Moses wrote, how are yo going to believe what Jesus said? LMFAO..
@@abelincoln8885 Let US make man in OUR image is the original polytheism that the Hebrews used as a template to create their god. You are speaking nonsense fed to you by conartists.
“Conjunction junction what’s your function? Hookin up words and phrases and clauses.” -Schoolhouse rock. Or EARTH in other words. I loved that. It’s more complicated than that but yeah. ❤️🔥🙌 Thanks 🙏🏻
@H U G O "he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone." Revelation 19:20. Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."
I think God uses such things to give us a word picture of things to come. While a lava flow fits the bill, the physical things of earth are often used by God in his Word to describe spiritual things.
@@saintphilis there’re a real lake of fire, that is the second death. Death of the spirit it to be thrown into the lake of fire along with Satan at the end of the age. Real place. Just not here on this earth like the lava flow you point out.
@@shadowraidlegend9426 (I don't know where the lake of fire is.) I agree with most of what You say. People are watching a live lava flow and yet they say; there is no real lake of fire(like Revelation) when they look at the lava flowing. They deny the obvious:somewhere there is a real 1.
The light of Genesis 1 is the Divine Expression, spoken into being. This same light, is found in Revelation 21.... and there will be no need for the sun nor the moon for the Glory, of GOD did lighten it, and the LAMB is the light there of. This is the very heart of GOD that spoke all of this into existence. ...
If the Sun was created on Day 4, and the Earth was Formless in the second sentence of Day 1, then wouldn't "Light" refer to the elementary particles which constitute what we know of as our Elemental table? Would "Light" refer to the creation of Matter, Energy, Gravity, and Light (photons)? ... and whatever sub-particles (quarks to strings) that we theorize and/or detect?
God's Light is revealed in Christ, whose light of love shines into lives darkened by sin (1 John 1:5-7). Jesus declares that He is the "light of the world" (John 8:12; 9:5). John describes Jesus, the incarnate Word, as coming into the world to be the "light of men" and "the true light which gives light to everyone" (John 1:1-9).
@@katlyn214 But John 1:3 and Hebrews 1:2 makes it clear that Jesus existed when the universe was created... so although Jesus was referred to as "the light" elsewhere in the Bible, He was not "the light" that was separated from the darkness in Genesis 1. Biblically, He existed before that.
@@RealYellowbeard I am learning not to put human limitations. In Revelation the Holy One is spoken of as being a Lamb, a Lion, a Priest, the Alpha and Omega, and many others throughout the Word. I dont have a problem with a description as "Light", even if it might stretch my understanding.
Is anybody else picking up Tanit the fertility godess @23:50 (the image on the left of screen labeled "life")? Because with that symbol next to a statement claiming "surrounding the crooked one" makes my head scream NAKASH! And since we've (modern times man) have discovered serpent mounds with Tanit symbols and structures near by, this makes me think that we're seeing a "warning" sign! Also, El is a common placed name for the "other teams" mentioning of their god(s), especially Ba'al/Baal/Baal-Hamon and Tanit is directly related to Baal-Hamon (Baal is Tanit's "consort" or husband).
Circular reasoning at its best. We had the Bible, in English, before the KJV existed and the readers of the Geneva Bible looked at the new KJV the same way you look at other English translations. You have turned a translation into an idol. You can’t make a perfect translation from Hebrew into English, as our bibles would have to be ten times thicker to pull the whole meaning of each word. Word study is a great way to understand scripture even better. There wasn’t a book of James, nor a man named James in the Greek, as the name is Jacobos, or Jacob. The KJV needed the kings approval, so we saw a twisting of a name into James. Don’t tell me how perfect the KJV is. It is a great translation, but there are others too, There are bad ones too, ie “The Message”, or “the new world translation”.
The AV is perfect in English. God made a perfect translation out of the “original” 5000 years ago. Adam was the original and Enoch, the 7th from Adam, was translated and Noah the 10th from the “original” was providentially preserved. Why do you people “CHOKE” on the words translation and preservation? Nowhere does the scripture say the “originals” are to be preserved. Less than 1% of the population on earth speak Hebrew and Greek. Yet 1/3 of the population on earth have contact with the English.
Is everyone actually READING what Moses said in Genesis Chapter 1? Let's look at the word 'Heaven'. What is it? Moses wrote this book so where is it clear what 'heaven' is to Moses. God made 'heaven' in the 2nd day. He turns the middle part of the water we read about in verse 2 into a firmament. What is a firmament...it was water so it must be another kind of substance, right? God gave it the name of 'Heaven'. We are still not sure just what heaven is so let's read further along in what Moses wrote. If we look at the 5th day we see God making marine and flying animals from the water. This must be the lower water layer mentioned in the 2nd day account. We are told that the WINGED FOWL FLY in the FIRMAMENT of Heaven. The marine creatures move by pushing against the water, land creatures by pushing against the ground, so what do flying creatures push against... AIR! So Heaven, according to the information Moses provides us with, is our ATMOSPHERE, not the universe or where God's throne is. More on this later. What about the 'Earth'? If we look at verse 2 we see that what will become 'earth' is under water where the FACE of the DEEP is underneath the DARKNESS. The earth is said to be VOID... what does that mean? Going to Isa 45:18 we see that the 'earth' was created/made/FORMED by God to be INHABITED. So in verse 2 we are being told that there were no people on the earth because it is underwater. By the 3rd day the water of verse 2 had become a layer of water ABOVE Heaven, some of it turned into Heaven and finally a layer of water BELOW heaven and then there is the FACE of the DEEP, which is the land where the future earth is, referred to being WITHOUT FORM at this stage. On the 3rd day we see God make SEAS. Seas require basins made of LAND, so obviously God had formed BASINS in the Face of the Deep. The lower layer of water flowed into these basins to form what God called SEAS. The land surrounding the sea basins had stayed where it was in verse 2, but now it was ABOVE THE WATER LEVEL. Of course it was wet at first, but Heaven, the atmosphere, had followed the water level down as it went into the sea basins. Heaven came in contact with the surrounding land and dried it out. God called the DRY LAND, Earth. Then plant life started to grow, the first life form. Notice that according to the information given by Moses it is NOT our PLANET that is the Earth, but just the LAND ABOVE THE WATER LEVEL of the seas. BEFORE Adam and Eve could be put on this planet God had to put DRY land for them to live on PLUS AIR to BREATHE. That is why verse 1 says, 'In the BEGINNING God made Heaven (the atmosphere) and the Earth (dry land)'. The word 'beginning' refers to the 2nd and 3rd days at the BEGINNING OF THE WEEK or the Creation process. The great majority of Christians and even non-Christians think of Heaven as being a place far away from our planet where God's throne is. Others use it to refer to the universe of stars etc. Lots of people use both these concepts. It has become part of our dictionaries. However, as we see from above, what God called Heaven is just the atmosphere. The word 'Heaven' in the Bible is often used as a reference point. The term Father IN Heaven is different from Father INSIDE Heaven. The word IN is a relational word such as in saying the TV station broadcasts its program IN color, the word IN is not referring a box the signal is inside of but to the kind of signal that is being sent. Being IN Heaven is not being INSIDE a building, they are two different words. In reference to the clergy Jesus told the Jews not to call any man ON EARTH Father or Rabbi or Master for ONE is your Father IN HEAVEN. Mat 23:9. Your natural father can be called 'father' because he actually contributed to your existence as does God. Anyone else calling himself your father is claiming to be God, blasphemy! Do you know of anyone on our planet who claims to be God and sits on a white throne in a city of seven hills? Jesus is coming from outside this planet, from heaven. The word 'heaven' here tells us the direction Jesus is coming from, which is not north, east, west or south. God did indeed make the universe, but not during this week in Genesis Chapter 1. It doesn't matter when God created the universe, only that He created it by His word instantly so that all the functions could function immediately. Evolutionists talk about millions and billions of years because they are trying to get enough time for everything to come into existence by accident, but even the atoms could never come into existence by accident. Whether God created the universe trillions or billions of years doesn't matter to the Christian as God can do anything in a moment of time whenever He wants. Genesis is simply a part of God's dealing with the rebellion of Satan and his angels, intending to replace the fallen angels with us. I challenge you to figure that out yourself, it is not hard.
VERY GOOD TEACHING. I ACTUALLY UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU WERE DESCRIBING AND IT CLEARED MANY POINTS OF CONFUSION IN THW FIRST CHAPTER. VERY VERY EXCITING! GOD MADE THE BACKDROP FIRST THEN HE PLACED THE PLANET. THE HOME THEN THE GARDEN OF GODS HOME IN ITS PLACE. NO CHAOS!!! JUST NEEDED TO BE COMPLETED,FINISHED. THE ENERGY WAS LIGHT SHINING ON THE EARTH TO EXHIBIT THE TIME OF ONE DAY. ONE ROTATION. EXCELLENT LECTURE. PRAISE THE LORD.
Truth is beautiful
Professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.
The devils also believe and tremble.
@@professorneturman2249 where would a newer layer of earth come from?
@@professorneturman2249 your religion does not have an answer huh? How about this, who does evolution say came first, male or female? Male and female reproductive organs are so diametrically opposite of each other that neither could have evolved from the other? Yet neither could have came into existence without the other? Ill wait for evolutions answer?
@@professorneturman2249 your choice to ignore God makes no difference. You believe there to be no God so therefore evolution is your religion.
@@donniev8181 . Your question is one of the best arguments against the evolution nonsense yet!
Can we have a 5 hour long version of this lecture please?!! I feel like this is just a preview teaser!
I was thinking the same thing. LOL I love when people, who are Hebrew or Greek grammar nerds, start to interpret the text. The Hebrew language is very precise, and very vivid. It is very different from our English language. I attempted to learn Hebrew at one point, and it gave me an extreme headache. It is very different from our own language, and much more precise. It isn't easy to learn. If you follow the proper grammar rules in Hebrew, it seems to back itself up so that you can't mess up the meaning. It is very exact, so when in doubt about a verse in the bible then go to the Hebrew or Greek that it was originally written in. It will tell you for sure what it is saying. This presentation brought it out beautifully. A shout out, with much admiration, for this man taking the time to become proficient in this language. It isn't an easy accomplishment. I understand , with compassion, when he said that his class groaned with the assignment from their professor. LOL
I prefer the 5hr+ videos. Anything less than 30 mins is not long enough. Too bad we live in a 20 sec world.
Have you listened to Chuck Missler on creation?
God also created the Hebrew language. God didn't create junk.
@@bethfurry7461 chuck is a wealth of information. he made me to not doubt the bible at all. the best thing about chuck is how he can see "TYPES OF" for example a story in the old testament will have similar parrallels to the new testament. i find such foreknowledge in the bible beyond human imagination.
Doug, I keep coming back and watching this over and over. I can’t get enough.
You’re like an orchestra leader, putting God‘s word to music with your hand, gestures.
Bravo may God keep blessing you
This was unbelievably good. I imagined the two Hebrews discussing the one individual referenced in the hieroglyphic and then looking to God for their deliverance, and I marveled that God has seen fit to graft me into the family of faith, the family of Abraham.
I believe Time is the container that space and matter are able to exist and move. Everything is effected by time, most creations by mankind have timing engineered into it, if not effected by it.
May God bless you and all here through the knowledge of the Son.
Mr Petrovich is, like the late Chuck Missler, an incredibly good teacher. His explanations for both verse 3 (about the 'light') and verse 5 (rotation of earth giving us our 24 hr day) are superb. Why is this so difficult for people to understand Hebrew is complex but very explicit. This also completely supports young Earth creation. Praise God!
Lots of mental gymnastics going on here, shoe horning Heliocentic theory into Biblical text. Genesis literally speaks of at least two light sources, exactly what we experience.
Ambient light is parallel light, direct sun light is divergent.
Test it for youself.
@@deanfloyd8931 We have been given a brain and common sense and through those, we have discovered we live on a planet orbited by a moon and both orbiting a sun. Yes, heliocentric.
Two light sources: moon for night, sun for day. Pretty straightforward.
@@joeboudreault2226Our frame of reference is given to us the early childhood conditioning. Unfortunately, the typical bible student will automatically filter the Word of God thru the sieve of a previously indoctrinated world view.
Reading and studying minus the pre conditioning changes the perception totally...it just not easy to turn off all the Scientism, it is the world religion,
all holy books must comply with what it dictates.
Sadly the so called church has been swept away also.
@@deanfloyd8931 Some truth here I think, Dean. When I study the Bible I make sure that I do not allow the secular world's conditioning to affect me. I pray and ask for the assistance of the Holy Spirit... that's how I interpret scripture; not by something I was taught in childhood or early life ... the Holy Spirit is my teacher, not presumptions from away back.
@@joeboudreault2226 Two questions that we should ask ourselves from time to time:
Have I been brainwashed?
Are my thoughts my own?
Personally, I answer a resounding "yes" to the first. Once established, "no" most likely to be the correct answer to the second.
Damage control has commenced
This was such rich material. Thank you, Dr. Petrovich.
LISTEN, I have been studying your interests from the age of 4, and now at the age of 72 have found your work. Wonderful. I tell people I found the Bible because of my love of the valley of the Kings. That lead me on to history, Jacob and Moses then Isaiah to the new testament. Now I am studying Hebrew. I am excited that I am not a fish out of water and grateful to watch you deliver most of your life's work. Thank you for being recorded you never know where your knowledge goes. Pebbles in a pond and all that. Gillie
Thank you from the UK, so glad to find you. Gen 1:1, the greatest intro ever written.
The probably right reading of Genesis 1-3 from the JPS translation:
When God began to create heaven and earth - the earth being unformed and void, with darkness over the surface of the deep and a wind from God sweeping over the water - God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light.
Easily pleased.
This was 55 minutes very well spent. Thank you Dr Petrovich!
This is great. Glory to God. Come Lord Jesus
Thank you Doug for your accuracy and also letting the word out.
That we can stand on God‘s word!
It’s not millions of years or billions of years of creation
It’s six days 24 hour days
I’m glad that I found you thank you for being steadfast in your faith
Come on fella, you know it's not six days. I'm not insulting your faith but parts of the Bible down through the ages have fallen foul of mistakes, spelling, copying, translation mistakes. The thing about Moses having horns, that was a translation error. Originally the word meant "shining" or "radiant". It was mistranslation & was copied as "horns" & now we see paintings with Moses sporting a pair of horns. The whole of Creation was not achieved in six days. Just saying.🙂
It is good that you guys are revealing the truth about what is being dug up & why the landscape of the earth & ocean floors look like they do. May the motivation for doing these things always be to bring glory to HIM who created us in HIS image & then came in the flesh to pay the price w/HIS body & blood on the cross so that we who believe could be redeemed & have eternal life w/HIM forever. Jesus Christ The Unique Son of God. HE is returning to take us home soon. TY IGH.
Romans Chap 1; "What is revealed is God's anger from heaven against all the godlessness & wickedness of people who in their wickedness Willingly Suppress the truth, because what is known about God is plain to them. For ever since the creation of the universe HIS invisible qualities both HIS eternal power & HIS divine nature have been clearly seen because they can be understood from what HE has made. Therefore they have no excuse", etc. etc. (1st Chap. v. 1-32 of Romans inspired by God & written 2000 yrs ago, reads like TODAY'S news, & this world hates HIS Word)
So much garbage in one video , incredible.
I couldn't have said it better, thank you Bill
THAT WAS AWESOME!!!
Thank you!
Shalom
Ty so much Dr Doug! That was absolutely awesome!! How Great is our God!!
Brother thank you for your hard work research and faith. The closer we get to the end the clearer it all becomes
This has helped my understanding of certain concepts God has been showing me progressively in His Word. Thank you so much for allowing God to teach you and use you Dr.Petrovich.
This segment has opened my eyes. Keep walking that straight path!! I also enjoyed the video you have on the tower of babble expansion! Thanks for sharing! Shalom!
It closed your eyes to reality.
Terrific teaching! I love this sentence : "There was no empty space before God created it."
Great presentation, thank you for sharing.
I would posit that by the text the first thing God created was time. This is implied in the words “In/beginning”.
Some would argue that in order to have time, you also need to have at the same time matter and space. If not, where would you put time?
Within the first week God made day and night, lights for both. Thus He created time. When you see what a day and a night is made from there's every hour, every minute etc within it. In Jesus name He reveals this to you all as you read scripture too. His wisdom, knowledge, understanding and revelation. Thank you Jesus praise God 🙏🕊️💕🔥🙏
@@AbrahamBarberi Hmm...valid point. What if within the first second, God created the sub-atomic particles and the sub-atomic time, something like in the secular standard model? E.g.: at say 10^-43 second. I think both the Bible and secularists may agree that there were instant creations or formations (evolutions according to the secularists) - when the 4 forces of nature separated themselves from an initial energy symmetry. As a biblical creationist this application could fit into Gen 1:2-3, in the first part of 1 day of God's creation.
Wouldn't it be fair to say that eternity is "time" immeasurable? / Perhaps "in beginning" introduces "measurable time", since time is only relevant to the finite. / I believe that time (and everything else) has always existed in the mind of God, therefore, it always existed.
@@wayward54 Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
There's more to that chapter of what God made in the beginning of the earth, life, creations, the first week. Everything began then and it's a great book; the whole gospel is. Praise God thank you Jesus 🙏
Very well done I love how you took such a deep subject and brought it into picture form.
I came to be Born Again through Supernatural means, afterward came the study of The Bible (With a slow learning of Hebrew) and the authentication that The scriptures confirm that God is who he says he is as a matter of fact whether through free will this is accepted.
I see many of the comments here as intellectual jousting(Pride on display) I love the continuity of The Hebrew in this presentation especially the “He who is” which is exactly what The Lord Jesus (Yeshua) stated in John when he flatly proclaimed to the Pharisees challenging HIS authority and origin “ Before Abraham was I AM” confirming he was the voice of the burning bush...... with no beginning or end YHVH the Tetragrammaton the Ayeh Asher Ayeh .
Jesus stated Moses wrote those books more than once and also confirmed other prophets wrote scripture as moved by The Holy Spirit ie(Daniel and Isaiah). Great presentation and blessed by it.
Thank you so much. My heart is so full with answers to questions I have had all my life. Your enthusiasm is shared!
"A man who thinks half-heartedly will not believe in God, but a man who truly thinks has to believe in God" - Isaac Newton
Newton was all that and a bag of chips when it came to gravity, forces, and optics. But... he believed in alchemy, was gay, and thought his biggest achievement was staying a virgin regarding women. Bit of a nutter (seems to be common with those of higher mental function).
Lol, Isaic Newton, the famous occultist freemason lol.
@@-kepha8828 your opinion does not change the statement. You're the usual culprit that cannot refute what anyone says, then you attempt to attack the person. Be gone dullard
@@donniev8181 keep calling names. It will surely make you look wise when your statements continue to fall flat.
@@-kepha8828 have you ever heard of the pot calling the kettle black? Thinking that 200 billion trillion stars came from a dot of nothing is a great religious belief to have when calling me out for mine.
Thank you Brother for an EXCELLENT explanation of God’s Word, am so so blessed; Praise be to our God….and….thanks again
A wonderful explanation of the beginning. I look forward to hearing more!! God bless!
The idea regarding (19:00) elohim is one issue that is in question since elohim refers to spirit beings and not absolute to the trinity. This difference in how that term is interpreted and applied can be found in teaching by Dr. Michael Heiser and Dr. Tim Mackie and others. Their teaching on elohim and how it is used throughout the Bible provides clarity.
I would suggest that "one day" was referring to the order of how the day occurs, evening then morning. This way, the pattern is in harmony with the rest of scripture according to how YHWH ordained keeping time, especially for His set apart feasts. The suggestion you provided about the earth's spinning axis does not keep in harmony with the rest of scripture that speaks about the earth being fixed and immovable. The Light and Darkness separation is the knowledge of "good" and "evil" which He separated because only Light [goodness] is in the heavens dwelling with Him. Eve was later tempted by the same knowledge and ate of its fruit. The "good" eat manna from heaven. Eating His Word means to internalize it. His Word is layered with literal and allegorical synonyms. This is how the imagery is kept relevant while at the same time historically accurate. His ways [light] will always win out when measured up to the ways of the world [dark]. There is mention of a new heaven and earth coming, one that He brings to us. Like you said, and I agree with, we are the main stage.
A few verses to consider
Psalm 104:5, 33:9, 93:1, 96:10, 119:89-90
1 Chron 16:30
Isaiah 14:7, 45:18, 40:22
Zechariah 1:11
Job 26:7, 26:10
Proverbs 8:28
2 Peter 3:5
Rev 7:1
I think you do a great deal of study and hard work that does not go unnoticed. But your argument for this discussion does little to sway the mindset of a berean that factors in every single detailed verse in order to view the whole picture in harmony. There are several examples where we are warned against using the knowledge of the fallen transgressed state of mankind to fit into the Wisdom of the Most High. Tread carefully and study more thoroughly the philosophy behind the knowledge you present. Does it harmonize with the entire Bible from beginning to end? Why would YHWH use specific forms of words for Moshe to record if He meant it to be viewed in their period of time mindset? Where did the great ancient thinkers get their epiphanies? Why were the giants referred to as "mighty, of old, men of renown?" What did the sons of God [Watchers] teach mankind? Who and how were the monolithic structures built? Why do we find the pyramid structure on every continent? Why does YHWH say not to replicate what is in Heaven? Why is the pyramid structure used for conceptual ideologies, psychology, governments, religions, occult philosophy, etc.? It all connects to that first day created and snowballs into what we witness in our time. Free will is a brilliant concept, but those who chose the Dark over Light [transgression of YHWH's righteous laws] will not find their dwelling place with Him. And when transgression is finally abolished after the second advent during the second death, the Dark consciousness will cease existence forever and ever.
49:20 - This is interesting if you consider that what we know of as "the speed of light" is a convention; exclusively the 2-way (round-trip) speed of light, halved. And that it is impossible to conduct any experiment to measure the one-way speed of light. Time is also not a constant (proven), and so I wonder if this also suggests time dialation relative to the beginning.
At, around, 10:15 you said "for free" and you got my "like" and "subscribe". God's word should go out freely among all men.
Thanks Dr Petrovich. At least one Academic that believe the Bible to be true. You are one in a million. God will bless you. I know what a battle it is to be surrounded by professionals that deliberately choose to reject the world of God. Every word of the Bible is true and authorised by God's Holy Spirit.
With that view point history is quite, and amazingly enough so also is our future.
Even the bits on where to buy and how hard you can beat your slaves..?
God is the genuine and sole author of this book we call the Bible. Because only one who knows the end from the beginning could have foretold those things that came to pass, exactly as the prophets had predicted!
Excellent. This shows why going to the depth of any bible subject is so rewarding.
This was excellent. Thank you!
Love the work God has you and your crew doing. So much biblical truth and real history we should be studying and sharing with are children 👍👌
Or just sell your kids into slavery. Lol
Excellent, thanks so much for posting.
I just love this channel💖
I really enjoyed that
L univers créé par Dieu à un périmètre fini avec un volume infini 🔥💜🔥alléluia
Thankyou Dr Doug Petrovich..you have incredibly good works. I'm devastated I can't find your books, thus far.
You were probably looking in the children’s section. There are plenty of good books on astronomy in the adult section. Why don’t you try looking there.
Incredibly interesting!
Amazing information! It was too short, I could've listened for hours.
Impressed. Comments on and NO cartoons. Amazing. Credit to you to explain the unexplainable.
Wow great lecture, i wish youd keep going and do the entire book.
Fascinating. I love the detail.
Excellent 🙏🏼
From Genesis chapter one, Dr. Petrovich informs us that the Triune God alone is responsible for creation ex nihilo.
The plurality of "elohim" does not inherently indicate pluriunity. I'm also not saying it disproves it, but the verbs are conjugated as singular, not plural. The Gen. 1:26 "let us make" is an exception, but similar exceptions exist for human characters elsewhere in the bible, and a proposal to take action is a common theme among them (we even sometimes do so in English, e.g. "Give us a chance," "Let's not".) "And God SAID" immediately before it beginning the verse is also singular. It's important to understand that Biblical Hebrew often uses the "majestic plural" in many contexts, including even using the very same word "elohim" referring to a singular, influential human being ("mighty one" or "judge"). This is roughly equivalent to the "royal 'We'" used by British monarchs to refer to their individual selves. Many other languages utilize the same concept, and only a few centuries ago it was integral to everyday English based on age & social status. I'm disappointed the presenter was not upfront about this, because he should know.
Great teaching!
This man showed you there is no room for the GAP theory, reading in the language God reviled his word!!
Thanks for the info
Doug, my wife and I have listened to about 6 of your lectures, including this one twice. Great material and presentation. I'd like to hear you elaborate more on the creation of the stars. It was not clear to me as to whether or not you were suggesting that the stars were separate creations, or were made from existing matter. You mentioned a divine fire works display. You may be familiar with both Jason Lisle and Spike Psaris, both astrophysicists. Both men reject the big bang theory. I would highly recommend you read pages 79 - 81 of Jason Lisle's book, "Taking Back Astronomy". He gives one of the best arguments against the big bang theory; the absence of antimatter in the universe. I believe the stars were individual creations, certainly none we know of as complex as earth, but seeing the complexity and diversity of stars and planets, I believe the stars / planets were most likely individual creations, just like angels are all individual creations, not a race like with men.
Both men have lectures on youtube; just type their name in the youtube search bar.
'Planets' are the wandering stars. 'Stars' refers to the fixed constellations.
When scripture describes the Spirit “hovering” over the waters of the deep, it can also be translated “vibrating”. Investigate “sonoluminescence” which also creates light in water from vibration-which is closer to the biblical account, that the Holy Spirit vibrated over the waters of the deep and created light.
Wonderful lesson brother. Bless you
Regarding Genesis 1:5: "And there was evening and there was morning, one day" you can find this in the Chumash, Stone edition, Torah. Thanks for a great lesson
🤔 Elohim, have you considered our Heavenly Father and the heavenly host? Who were the “host” if not the angels/sons of God(children in celestial/spiritual body) 1 Cor 15; 2 Cor 5: Job 38-40
More like "day one," considering the other days of the creation week use the same formula. "Two day," "three day," etc. really don't make any sense as consistent parsing of that syntax.
I’m at 14:37 in this video, truly stunned at the “vaccinated terminology” used when the Israelites entered into the Lands of Canaan. There is a list of 7 “ites” Amorites being one, that were to be utterly destroyed and the LORD even gives the reasons why, it was due to their wickedness and that if not destroyed, their customs, idolatry, passing their children in the fire, etc would become a snare among the Israelites.
28:14 And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed. Genesis
You should use a modern translation, because the KJV is both out of date in its manuscript scholarship, and uses a form of English that is 500 years old and which is getting harder to understand for modern speakers of the language.
@@roberthanna3012 , you should use a King James version because of the marvelous old English language used.
@@senatorjosephmccarthy2720 Your nom de guerre says a lot about you. The King James is a poor translation because it relies on later and fewer manuscripts, and the English language has evolved away from the King James.
Thank you so much! Very helpful!!
“And all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution. But evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived.”2 Timothy 3:12,13
What are you implying?
@@Kenneth91619 you think he’s the one implying it. He didn’t write the Bible. He’s being a messenger.
@@Kenneth91619
He sounds like a Jesuit.
A fabulous presentation.
Unless I'm missing something in the graphic on the screen at the 10:00 minute mark, it appears that a single letter "tau" is doing "double duty" for the two separate words: snt timhn ("a year of astonishment"). Would this be common in these ancient inscriptions for a single letter to be a part of two separate words?
Also, would the astonishment be viewed as "because of the Lady" or "upon the Lady"?
This guys absolutely Great
That was so good!
What word would they have used to indicate the passing of a day or the passing of time?
Dr. Good stuff. You did not address the water (all created) in vs 2. Where did that water come from?
Surely, the first was time! “In the beginning”
Excellent. Encouraging. Thank you.
Excellent presentation. My only concern is that we avoid the tendency to fill in details where we really have no information. For example, I prefer Faulkner's view over Hugh Ross regarding light travel, but it's unprovable. So I just how we tread lightly.
Very good. Thank you
God bless you..!
Great..Can I get some study materials or resources?
Beautiful
38:25 time - Doug, it’s properly “out” and not “up”. The enormity of the earth leads us to forget to take all dimensions in context with one another. There really isn’t “up and down.” It’s “in and out”; towards the center of (dominant) mass, and away from it. I hope I’m making sense.
@james welsh. James, I am sort of with you on this and I picked that up as well. I don’t have the specifics yet ironed out but I think I know where you are heading. I have had the idea of what your “center of (dominant) mass” was and it contained all the light that was needed perspectively because there was going to be a separation of light and dark before the waters below. The solid crust would be formed to separate the plasma “light” core from the liquid surface, during the formation of the eventual round form, magnetic poles and the eventual magnetic field. I don’t think there had to be a “up or down” to create a evening and a morning, I think that came later. We know you can have evening and morning like in the polar regions without the absence or presence of the day 4 “greater light” and “lesser light”. I have had this idea for a while so I’m not sure that is what your thoughts are as well and I’m not eloquent or well versed enough to explain it all, but if I’m reading you wrong then let me know. But thanks for pointing that out from a otherwise awesome teaching.
The World English Bible (WEB) is a public domain version. It translates Gen 1:5 correctly as "There was evening and there was morning, one day" rather than "day one" or "first day." Likewise, the Context Group Version (CGV) Bible and Rotherham Emphasized Bible also have "one day" too.
Fantastic!!!
Is there a lecture #2 ,3,4.....….????? How can I find????
The validity of Holy Scripture is infallible. Our LORD JESUS Himself appeared to Moses, Moses as Abraham was considered to be God's friend. Some "Scholars" will seek to talk out of the mouth of the tempter due to their own unbelief. Thank you for sharing. Praise our Good LORD CHRIST JESUS!
In listening to this, an intriguing question arose: Is it possible that there a time division between Gen. 1:2 and Gen. 1:3? The idea of "one day" seems to be starting with the creation of light and not necessarily with "in beginning", as though the artist painted the basic background color, paused and then began painting light on it, finishing the painting in seven literal days though having started the very general framework before them.
I am definitely not advocating that anything but stasis was going on in the prelude to light and the question can be fairly asked of the idea, "Why would God pause?" I don't know why He would. But if He did, it might entertain some interesting thoughts on some of the old age/new age of the earth conundrums.
As I said though, this could NOT challenge the idea of a very literal 6 day creation of everything from light to Adam if one uses the Bible as a source, which I do.
I dont know if you are right or wrong..I have my opinion..but, let’s put that away for a second
Such a beautiful analogy..you are obviously an artist or at least you have an artists soul
I never considered that possibility before
@@mccalltrader Before seeing this video, the idea had not occurred to me either. That's one of the fun things about these videos and the thoughts and connections they provoke.
As to art, the closest I've come was in metal sculpture many, many years ago. Most of my life has been spent in construction as a general contractor. No I drive a bus for a private Christian school...
The question is really moot, and here's why. Between the moment when Gᴏᴅ created the Earth and the moment Gᴏᴅ said, "Let there be light," nothing happened except the Spirit of Gᴏᴅ hovering. Nothing. Certainly no Grand Canyon formed because there was no land. Neither were fossils formed because there were no creatures. I suppose radioactive atomic elements could decay but that's about all that could happen.
@@rubiks6 Actually that is basically my point/conclusion as far as dating things radiometrically is concerned.
@@cdc3 - Radiometric dating fails for many reasons but the most obvious one is that the initial ratios of parent/daughter elements cannot be known.
could easily listen to him for 3 more hours :)
*Trinity worship = Sun (Baal) worship* *21:07*
Dear sir, I don’t suppose you read any comments but I have a question. I don’t know anything about the zodiac for some are simply look at the heavens from England and see only these obvious constellations. Using the Greek names: - Orion, Cassiopeia, Cygnus the swan, The plough, or the big dipper, you might call it. Orion clearly has the number three and the number seven in it, and it is the most glorious constellation surrounded by the brightest stars. The plough essentially has seven points in it as well, and it points to the one star but never moves in the sky the polestar. I would prefer to call it a scroll because it looks like a scroll, and once again I think a number seven is in essentially its construction. And sickness is obviously across and Cassiopeia. It’s a zigzag obviously the sign of a snake so there are two symbols of salvation right there; Moses lifted up a snake for salvation, and Jesus was lifted up on a cross. So my question is, although I probably don’t read these Linx, what do you know what the Hebrew names for these constellations are please?
That got mixed up!! Cassiopeia is a zig zag dictation changed it to ‘sickness’
Man!….this teaching/revealing of scripture, language, the nuances of each…is awesome, interesting, challenging,….
@NEAR TERM EXTINCTION - HUMAN
It's a great read, and it almost rarely mentioned the serpent
That Serpent has a function attached to it. That would be Accuser. In Job the Serpent was sent to accuse him of not having faith in God. The friends of Job were all speaking with the tongue of the Accuser and had rebelled from God.
This "Serpent" is capable of talking through a person that allows themselves to rebel against God. Satan the Serpent was speaking thoughts and Peter spoke them to Yeshua when He was preparing for the Cross. Peter was rebuked and Satan left Peter for a time. It is possible to possessed by a nother spirit other than the Holy Spirit. Many people are presenting that false devil into their comments lately.
In the New Testament, Satan and his demons have the power to enter and possess people; this is what is said and did happen to Judas (Luke 22:3; John 13:27; cf. Mark 5:12-13; Luke 8:30-32). And yet more than half of the Saducees and some.ofnthe Pharisees were also possessed, and yet appeared to be holy men.
Many people that entertain people for a living admit they take on spirits.
Denzel Washington for example. Acting is the career of manifesting a different spirit other than oneself and create a false environment outwardly. It's called a "Show"
So one is going to have to reflect on what it is they believe, when one's own worldly peers believe in spirits and channel them. Which the Bible speaks of, the wicked of the world admit to this, and one mocks it's existence. Many musicians admit to selling their soul to this very same Satan, otherwise known as lucipher bit that is merely a Latin title. It's not the name. Neither is Satan. Neither is the devil. These are all titles. Originally in the Hebrew word for him is Haylel.
@NEAR TERM EXTINCTION - HUMAN When a person is walking as YHVH intends, he/she cannot be insulted/offended. Magic is part of Paganism and has nothing to do with YHVH or those who walk in all of His ways.
John 1:12-13
12 But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name:
13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
John 14:15-17
15 “If you love Me, keep My commandments.
16 And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever-
17 the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him; but you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you.
John 14:20-21
20 At that day you will know that I am in My Father, and you in Me, and I in you.
21 He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him.”
John 14:23-24
23 Jesus answered and said to him, “If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him.
24 He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine but the Father’s who sent Me.
All have the choice to follow Yashua Messiah and walk through that door to YHVH. We can choose to be grafted in (adopted) through faith. YHVH forces no one. Those who choose and obey His Commands indeed to have something that those who deny Him and choose to walk as the world walks, do not have. They have Him abiding within us as the Holy (set apart) spirit. It is not ‘magic’ nor is it fantasy. You cannot accept this because you do not know Him (relational). He is Truth, Light, and Life.
As long as you breath, you can choose which path to follow. Choose wisely. One path leads to death and the other to eternal life.
Shalom (peace)
6:25 Jesus attests to Moses as the writer. John 5:46-47 "If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?"
Where does Moses mention Jesus? Give me book, chapter, and verse.
@@TonyTigerTonyTiger Moses wrote about the Messiah. Jesus is the Messiah. Look up your own verses.
@@TonyTigerTonyTiger The entire book of Genesis .. which clearly reveals God is a Father, Son, & Spirit ... the Messiah is the "only begotten Son" of God sent by his Father to be sin sacrifice that will satisfy God's just nature to punish all who sin ... and ... God's Chosen People are simply People of Faith.
The first Chapter of Genesis clearly states ... God is plural & singular .. and at least a Father(God Head) and a Spirit. Let us make Man our image. God( singular & plural) is male ... and from Man came Woman ... so logically from a Patriarchal God, from a Father comes his only begotten Son.
The Binding of Issac ... is actually a Messianic Prophecy ... and confirms God will provide the sacrifice ... that will satisfy God's just nature to punish all who sin.
You know he book. And you know he chapter and verses. But since you do not believe what Moses wrote, how are yo going to believe what Jesus said? LMFAO..
@@abelincoln8885 "But since you do not believe what Moses wrote,"
Moses didn't write Genesis, or the Torah in general.
@@abelincoln8885 Let US make man in OUR image is the original polytheism that the Hebrews used as a template to create their god. You are speaking nonsense fed to you by conartists.
Thank you Dr. Doug. As always an intriguing presentation. Loved it 💛
What bible version are you using? Also what version of Hebrew are you using? Paleo or something elso. Thank-you!
Thank you.
If tohu just means empty then why in Isaiah did God say he did not create the world tohu?
“Conjunction junction what’s your function? Hookin up words and phrases and clauses.”
-Schoolhouse rock.
Or EARTH in other words. I loved that. It’s more complicated than that but yeah. ❤️🔥🙌 Thanks 🙏🏻
What day was water created?
Over at the Live chat for the La Palma volcano I pointed out Revelation 19:20, the Lake of Fire. But people are denying there is a real lake of fire.
@H U G O "he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone." Revelation 19:20.
Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."
I think God uses such things to give us a word picture of things to come. While a lava flow fits the bill, the physical things of earth are often used by God in his Word to describe spiritual things.
@@shadowraidlegend9426 That is a very vague description, wishy-washy. Is there a real lake of fire or not?
@@saintphilis there’re a real lake of fire, that is the second death. Death of the spirit it to be thrown into the lake of fire along with Satan at the end of the age. Real place. Just not here on this earth like the lava flow you point out.
@@shadowraidlegend9426 (I don't know where the lake of fire is.) I agree with most of what You say. People are watching a live lava flow and yet they say; there is no real lake of fire(like Revelation) when they look at the lava flowing. They deny the obvious:somewhere there is a real 1.
Check the Tree of Life version. It says in Gen. 1:5, ". . .So there was evening and there was morning - one day."
How can this be in a book
Consider The Creation Story Like You’ve Never Heard it Before @TheOriginalManRising
Truly Amazing ❤️
"Day age theory out the window". Wish you would have elaborated.
I think he means 1 day is equal to 1000 or a million years, for example to be consistent with evolution & old earth believers
The light of Genesis 1 is the Divine Expression, spoken into being. This same light, is found in Revelation 21.... and there will be no need for the sun nor the moon for the Glory, of GOD did lighten it, and the LAMB is the light there of. This is the very heart of GOD that spoke all of this into existence. ...
WTF🤦🤣 mass delusion 🤤🐑🤤🐑🤤🐑. Total make believe 🤦
If the Sun was created on Day 4, and the Earth was Formless in the second sentence of Day 1, then wouldn't "Light" refer to the elementary particles which constitute what we know of as our Elemental table? Would "Light" refer to the creation of Matter, Energy, Gravity, and Light (photons)? ... and whatever sub-particles (quarks to strings) that we theorize and/or detect?
God's Light is revealed in Christ, whose light of love shines into lives darkened by sin (1 John 1:5-7). Jesus declares that He is the "light of the world" (John 8:12; 9:5). John describes Jesus, the incarnate Word, as coming into the world to be the "light of men" and "the true light which gives light to everyone" (John 1:1-9).
@@katlyn214 But John 1:3 and Hebrews 1:2 makes it clear that Jesus existed when the universe was created... so although Jesus was referred to as "the light" elsewhere in the Bible, He was not "the light" that was separated from the darkness in Genesis 1. Biblically, He existed before that.
@@RealYellowbeard I am learning not to put human limitations. In Revelation the Holy One is spoken of as being a Lamb, a Lion, a Priest, the Alpha and Omega, and many others throughout the Word. I dont have a problem with a description as "Light", even if it might stretch my understanding.
Is anybody else picking up Tanit the fertility godess @23:50 (the image on the left of screen labeled "life")? Because with that symbol next to a statement claiming "surrounding the crooked one" makes my head scream NAKASH! And since we've (modern times man) have discovered serpent mounds with Tanit symbols and structures near by, this makes me think that we're seeing a "warning" sign! Also, El is a common placed name for the "other teams" mentioning of their god(s), especially Ba'al/Baal/Baal-Hamon and Tanit is directly related to Baal-Hamon (Baal is Tanit's "consort" or husband).
God bless you! Keep up the good work!
We don’t need a guru telling us what it says His Words are preserved perfectly for us in Kjv
🤣
Not even close to perfectly, but somewhat accurate as far the overall facts
Circular reasoning at its best. We had the Bible, in English, before the KJV existed and the readers of the Geneva Bible looked at the new KJV the same way you look at other English translations. You have turned a translation into an idol. You can’t make a perfect translation from Hebrew into English, as our bibles would have to be ten times thicker to pull the whole meaning of each word. Word study is a great way to understand scripture even better. There wasn’t a book of James, nor a man named James in the Greek, as the name is Jacobos, or Jacob. The KJV needed the kings approval, so we saw a twisting of a name into James. Don’t tell me how perfect the KJV is. It is a great translation, but there are others too, There are bad ones too, ie “The Message”, or “the new world translation”.
The AV is perfect in English.
God made a perfect translation out of the “original” 5000 years ago. Adam was the original and
Enoch, the 7th from Adam, was translated and Noah the 10th from the “original” was providentially preserved.
Why do you people “CHOKE” on
the words translation and preservation? Nowhere does the scripture say the “originals” are to be preserved.
Less than 1% of the population on earth speak Hebrew and Greek.
Yet 1/3 of the population on earth have contact with the English.
The Hebrew text tells a completely different story in Genesis 1 & 2 than all English translations.
Great explanation of the 1 day the axis of the complete day.
Is everyone actually READING what Moses said in Genesis Chapter 1?
Let's look at the word 'Heaven'. What is it? Moses wrote this book so where is it clear what 'heaven' is to Moses.
God made 'heaven' in the 2nd day. He turns the middle part of the water we read about in verse 2 into a firmament. What is a firmament...it was water so it must be another kind of substance, right? God gave it the name of 'Heaven'. We are still not sure just what heaven is so let's read further along in what Moses wrote. If we look at the 5th day we see God making marine and flying animals from the water. This must be the lower water layer mentioned in the 2nd day account. We are told that the WINGED FOWL FLY in the FIRMAMENT of Heaven. The marine creatures move by pushing against the water, land creatures by pushing against the ground, so what do flying creatures push against... AIR! So Heaven, according to the information Moses provides us with, is our ATMOSPHERE, not the universe or where God's throne is. More on this later.
What about the 'Earth'? If we look at verse 2 we see that what will become 'earth' is under water where the FACE of the DEEP is underneath the DARKNESS. The earth is said to be VOID... what does that mean? Going to Isa 45:18 we see that the 'earth' was created/made/FORMED by God to be INHABITED. So in verse 2 we are being told that there were no people on the earth because it is underwater.
By the 3rd day the water of verse 2 had become a layer of water ABOVE Heaven, some of it turned into Heaven and finally a layer of water BELOW heaven and then there is the FACE of the DEEP, which is the land where the future earth is, referred to being WITHOUT FORM at this stage.
On the 3rd day we see God make SEAS. Seas require basins made of LAND, so obviously God had formed BASINS in the Face of the Deep. The lower layer of water flowed into these basins to form what God called SEAS. The land surrounding the sea basins had stayed where it was in verse 2, but now it was ABOVE THE WATER LEVEL. Of course it was wet at first, but Heaven, the atmosphere, had followed the water level down as it went into the sea basins. Heaven came in contact with the surrounding land and dried it out. God called the DRY LAND, Earth. Then plant life started to grow, the first life form.
Notice that according to the information given by Moses it is NOT our PLANET that is the Earth, but just the LAND ABOVE THE WATER LEVEL of the seas.
BEFORE Adam and Eve could be put on this planet God had to put DRY land for them to live on PLUS AIR to BREATHE.
That is why verse 1 says, 'In the BEGINNING God made Heaven (the atmosphere) and the Earth (dry land)'. The word 'beginning' refers to the 2nd and 3rd days at the BEGINNING OF THE WEEK or the Creation process.
The great majority of Christians and even non-Christians think of Heaven as being a place far away from our planet where God's throne is. Others use it to refer to the universe of stars etc. Lots of people use both these concepts. It has become part of our dictionaries.
However, as we see from above, what God called Heaven is just the atmosphere. The word 'Heaven' in the Bible is often used as a reference point. The term Father IN Heaven is different from Father INSIDE Heaven. The word IN is a relational word such as in saying the TV station broadcasts its program IN color, the word IN is not referring a box the signal is inside of but to the kind of signal that is being sent. Being IN Heaven is not being INSIDE a building, they are two different words. In reference to the clergy Jesus told the Jews not to call any man ON EARTH Father or Rabbi or Master for ONE is your Father IN HEAVEN. Mat 23:9. Your natural father can be called 'father' because he actually contributed to your existence as does God. Anyone else calling himself your father is claiming to be God, blasphemy! Do you know of anyone on our planet who claims to be God and sits on a white throne in a city of seven hills? Jesus is coming from outside this planet, from heaven. The word 'heaven' here tells us the direction Jesus is coming from, which is not north, east, west or south.
God did indeed make the universe, but not during this week in Genesis Chapter 1. It doesn't matter when God created the universe, only that He created it by His word instantly so that all the functions could function immediately. Evolutionists talk about millions and billions of years because they are trying to get enough time for everything to come into existence by accident, but even the atoms could never come into existence by accident. Whether God created the universe trillions or billions of years doesn't matter to the Christian as God can do anything in a moment of time whenever He wants. Genesis is simply a part of God's dealing with the rebellion of Satan and his angels, intending to replace the fallen angels with us. I challenge you to figure that out yourself, it is not hard.