#13 CTX 3030 vs Fisher F75

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024

Комментарии • 42

  • @marklightfoot522
    @marklightfoot522 7 лет назад +20

    I have no doubts about the capabilities of the ctx, but in your video the majority of the signals the F75 was telling you it was rubbish and the ctx was telling you it was a good signal but when you dug it, it was mainly rubbish. The ctx telling you it was gold the f75 foil mmm what was it oh yes foil. when the f75 gave you a good signal it was something good like the coin, bits of chopped up can will fool any machine. I know for the money which machine I would be buying, oh yes the one I have the f75

  • @wobrien54
    @wobrien54 4 месяца назад

    Thank you you are one of the few people who compare the f75 to anything I'm looking at the f75 and the extera to see what I'm going to buy I won't be buying a gerret because I've had a couple and they seem to false more than other detectors

    • @user-qs4uh1pd8r
      @user-qs4uh1pd8r 3 месяца назад

      Tenho um Fisher F11 e aqui no Brasil a minelab dominou o mercado praticamente nos últimos anos, mas eu gosto da Fisher e estou tentado a continuar na Frequência única em vez de migrar para a mult que é a tendência atual...quero pegar um F75 ou pelo menos um F19😊

  • @U2BER2012
    @U2BER2012 7 месяцев назад +1

    I use a Fisher F75 LTD and I could tell you were locating trash just by the low & high tones you were getting while swinging side to side. As far as coin numbers, quarters hit at 82 dimes at 70 as well as copper pennies. Zinc coins hit around 62.

  • @mrkiks32
    @mrkiks32 8 лет назад +6

    Good video and nice comparison. The only thing is that you shouldve showed in what settings where on each machine. You need to set them both the same or at least on similar settings. Just to make it a neutral and fair comparison. I strongly believe not one of these machines has an edge or lead from one another, (though CTX has 28 frequencies, F75 one). There both very highly capable and deep seeking machines that put in expirienced hands they are going to do their jobs right. Again, thanks for the informative video and keep up the good work.

    • @saurabhratnaparkhi3894
      @saurabhratnaparkhi3894 5 лет назад

      In long depp 6 fit to 10 fit please tel mi
      The Best Gold Detector That Gets Riches in the Land

  • @deanedward2379
    @deanedward2379 8 лет назад +4

    The two machines speak a different language.

  • @Stanman121
    @Stanman121 7 лет назад +4

    For the price the Fisher F75 is one of the best inland detectors one can buy and it goes head to head with 4 times the price machines. Especially once you know how to understand what it's saying and nailed the settings. I wish it was waterproof, then I'd have my dream machine. But I wish I could afford a CTX3030 for water and the beaches.

  • @jomon723
    @jomon723 7 лет назад +2

    CTX for the beach,but I would take the F75 for inland" I have both and love both."

  • @audis6m
    @audis6m 5 лет назад +1

    I have never found anything interesting when on the f75 id jumped more than 5 , all good targets came almost solid numbers.

  • @steelydan42
    @steelydan42 Год назад

    I wish you would have used a smaller hand digger for digging. That big shovel will get you kicked out of the area faster

  • @yachtwork
    @yachtwork 7 лет назад

    Very entertaining and informative. Thanks for the vid.

  • @Metrorenovationsandmore
    @Metrorenovationsandmore 4 года назад +1

    Settings? Disc? Gain? Etc... Add a third 'tector and you'd have apples to oranges to grapefruit.

  • @michaelproctor8100
    @michaelproctor8100 7 лет назад +3

    You're comparing a $2,500 CTX to a detector that costs $500-700? What's next, comparing a Ferrari to a Honda Accord?

    • @Mr.Technical77
      @Mr.Technical77 7 лет назад +3

      Are you new to this? That comment gives you away. In mild to moderate soil the F75 LTD keeps up with and even surpasses some of the CTX 3030 abilities. This is widely known and the reason you'll see many hunters keep both in their arsenal.

    • @livewithnick
      @livewithnick 6 лет назад +2

      Michael Proctor doesn't matter the cost really. I wasted my money on the CTX because I was told it was "better". I found out for my own it wasn't and went back to my Teknetics T2. They're both supposed o be top of the line machine but Minelabs puts fancy features on there's that doesn't make it any better then over priced it.

    • @katdady67
      @katdady67 5 лет назад +2

      I've spent over 5 yrs learning The F75's Language. If you can master that very crucial learning curve, and Believe what the Machine is telling you. Then you can take that $750-$850 detector (I paid a bit more for mine) and literally beat the Batteries out of any of those high Dollar Fancy Machines! Get a Machine that has been proven in the field, stick with it until you have Learned that machines Language, Learn the sounds first, then use what's on the screen to Enhance that machines Language. After awhile you will be able to call your targets before you even dig them! I'm not talking about calling coins, that's easy, when you can call targets while Relic hunting. Then my friend you have what other detectorist call.. Way to much time on your hands! And really should get some new friends and give detecting a rest!

    • @dapawaz8310
      @dapawaz8310 Месяц назад

      Tones will tell you more than VDI numbers. I have a couple of detectors with a screen, but I don't look at it much except to check settings. You just have to learn to decipher what the audio is telling you. I think those of us who started with analog stuff had a bit of advantage. I've watched guys spend most of the day fiddling with the settings on their 2k wonder machine. Someone who knows how to run an F75 or an old Tesoro will usually smoke em.

  • @charlesdeshler202
    @charlesdeshler202 8 лет назад

    Ronnie, So what is your favorite of the two machines? Which one did you decide was the top performer?

  • @ruanschoeman9286
    @ruanschoeman9286 7 лет назад +1

    Theres a reason why fisher finds more...just kidding.. I know the 75 very well and wouldnt have dug those signals either. pretty much every time you hear a promising target (high tone )combined with an iron grunt its wraparound. walk on by. Dig solid repeatable signals. Theres a significant price difference between the two machines.
    But great video and thanks for sharing.

    • @jerryscary3098
      @jerryscary3098 7 лет назад +1

      Simon Rechner I agree with this on shallow targets....but those deepies can and will give off those iron grunts in between the high tones. dug a few deep silver dimes like this.

  • @massachusettsprepper
    @massachusettsprepper 8 лет назад

    Very nice comparison video my friend. Thanks for sharing.

  • @QuarterHoarder
    @QuarterHoarder 8 лет назад +1

    Some nice digs. Too bad your ball busting friend was ruining your day. Gotta try to loose that guy! Lol. Two quality machine and I hunt with friends that use both.

    • @ronniebprospecting7471
      @ronniebprospecting7471  8 лет назад

      Yea I like them both its cool to see what they vdi finds. Thanks for watching

  • @danworley8804
    @danworley8804 5 лет назад +1

    Your fisher found the wheat also

  • @925inder2
    @925inder2 7 лет назад

    cool video.

  • @charleshardcore215
    @charleshardcore215 6 месяцев назад

    Put a dime at 14 inches and see who wins i allready know lol

  • @AmericanCoinHunting
    @AmericanCoinHunting 8 лет назад +1

    Stick with your CTX , ditch the others , go to the beach and dig some gold ....Like your imaginary friend suggests ....lol

    • @ronniebprospecting7471
      @ronniebprospecting7471  8 лет назад

      I do like beach hunting I'll get in the water soon. Thanks for watching.

    • @jomon723
      @jomon723 7 лет назад +1

      CTX for the beach,but I would take the F75 for inland" I have both"