Growing up knowing my grandmother was born in 1911 & she passed in 2001,the amount of history she witnessed was mind blowing to me... my Father was born in 1946 he introduced me to me to this movie God rest them both. Great history lesson
You and I have something in common: one of my grandmothers was born in 1911, and both grandfathers fought in World War II. She told me of the Roaring Twenties, the Great Depression, World War II. She mentioned other events such as the JFK assassination. One thing I distinctly remember her telling me was that, back when Vietnam was underway, she was thankful I was just a kid, and couldn’t go (drafted for military service).
@@razorshark9320 NO WAY AS THE CLASSIC OF 1990 GOODFELLAS CANNOT BE EQUALED WHAT GREAT ACTORS AND THE DIRECTOR MARTIN SCORCESSE GAVE IT HIS BEST AND THAT ROLE BY JOE PESCI WHO WON BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR MADE IT A CLASSIC FOR YEARS TO COME
Back when gangsters had empires worth millions and class not like all these wannabe trash hippies theses days. Any gangsters back then would make any “blood gangsters” piss their low hanging pants and wouldn’t even come close to being on the same level as these guys back then.
I wouldn't go that far but it's better than some people make out. It's very much a docudrama in the style of the late 60's but I grew up watching it on local tv and still have a fondness for it.
White Heat, Little Caesar, Murder Inc, Key Largo, The Purple Gang, Scarface, The Public Enemy, Once Upon A Time in America, Kiss of Death, Smart Money, and the Valachi Papers are all great ones too! Lepke could’ve been better, I just didn’t like Tony Curtis as Lepke. David J. Stewart was a much better Lepke IMO
My great great-grandmother was born in 1925 she lived through the Great Depression when the stock market crashed in 1929 she lived to the Second World War the war in North Korea the Vietnam War all that other stuff but if my great-great-grandmother was alive today I don't think she'd make it
Roger Corman's one and only big budget A list movie. But being famous as a B list low budget director, the studio execs didn't trust him with a big budget. Basically the execs ongoing interference almost drove Corman insane. As a result, and despite offers, Corman never made another big budget film.
@@victorwadsworth821 Along with 2 children who were also working illegally at night under California's Child Labour Law. John Landis who directed that segment of The Twilight Zone: The Movie was charged with manslaughter and breaching child labour laws and found not guilty despite all the evidence. He was buddies with Spielberg at that time as he was also the producer.
The soft drink 7up is named for this. They have denied it of course. But back in the day it was a very popular event. The bottle even had a red dot. Seven up against the wall.
@𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐥𝐨 GREAT comment. I'm old enough to remember when Roger Corman's movies were called "camp" and Class B movies. Today's generation calls them art. So good to see this change in people's viewpoints. Indeed, these movies are genuine art with considerable merit.
@@Philbert-s2c Not unusual for artists to be self effacing while disparaging their own work. Recall Rock star Jim Morrison of the Doors ~ he took his best book of poetry and threw it in the fire. His work was lost to history and never recovered.
The Thompson Sub Machine gun at 8:30 with the flat forend didn't come until the 1940's in WW2, and Charles "the fixer" Fischetti wasn't murdered, he died of a heart attack on April 11th 1951
The tommy gun was developed during WW1, however, it was not used in the war. It was said that the gun was extremely heavy. At least, that is my understanding of it. It was named after the inventor.
Trivia: this film has in its cast two of the three condemned men in Kubrick's great Paths of Glory: Ralph Meeker as George "Bugs" Moran and Joe Turkel as Jake "Greasy Thumb" Guzik.
Their rights as you say are called Miranda rights, which provided that suspects must be informed of their legal rights when they are placed under arrest, didn’t become a law until June 13,1966. So in 1929 when this took place, they wouldn’t have needed to read them their rights because it didn’t exist yet.
That pool he got out of really was the pool of Capone, they turned it into a place you can visit. All Capone had to remember is where was all of his money when he got out of prison but he couldn't remember. His wife couldn't even make him remember because they lost everything and that money is still somewhere only Capone would know but back then they could have saved everything but Capone wasn't acting like the FEDs believed he was and they knew about the money because the book keeper could only tell them how many millions he should have but he has no clue what Capone did with it, all of that and he really was nobody after prison. He would never dream he would lose his mind that young and he thought 10 years, I'll be back making money just like before but God took his mind away. They could have picked a better actor to be Capone because he couldn't pull the role off , he didn't even act like Capone. I always thought like everyone else because all the movies made you believe the FBI found the man who could say and testify about how much money Capone had made. Then you learn the truth, the Mafia Lucky Luciano made and changed everything, they let him live after these murders because they all called Capone in and they knew his life was going to be voted on. He claimed he forgot about the rules and it's all new to every Boss and he just forgot about getting permission to have people killed. They gave him life but he will have to take a gun and get caught with it and you have to do so many months in jail but they left that up to Capone. He finally realized he wasn't running anything nomore, we all are on the same team but what could Capone do, he knew if he said, I'm not going to jail for that many months just because everyone thinks I had something to do with it but it's making it hard on everyone, the law will only allow but so much and the killing has to stop. He did do time in jail but they all agreed when he got out of jail and he was doing everything to be known as a gangster and nobody can touch him. He was doing everything John Gottie was doing. They decide to let him live but they made the book keeper testify and go to the FEDs. He was to never say anything about the Mafia but Capone has to learn, 10 years is a long time but the Mafia punished Capone, the FEDs take credit for but the Mafia doesn't care about that. They can make up their movies and nobody shot a G man like they show you in the movies. That would get you killed if you did kill one and to prove it, when Lucky was going to do his time and they found out a Boss was going to kill thr DA , Lucky had him killed and saved the mans life who put him away for 10 years. Those are just movies, nobody is allowed to kill a cop or FED because it goes against the rules, that is how you know the movies about him are fake. If the Mafia ever heard about Capone saying he wanted a fed dead and his family, Capone knew that was Death and they would kill Capone. He even knew I can't touch or kill anyone without permission and I can't tell a cop or FED your dead, lucky ended all of that. Capone agreed with omerta and the rules but Hollywood has to make you believe Capone killed cops and FEDs, that is a lie because he would die if he even thought about it
Late 60's were kind of an ifffy time for the ratings system. The old Hayes Code had collapsed and was totally ignored. Granted the violence here is nothing compared to films and tv in 2024.
This is a better than average Corman movie. It’s almost completely factual, but it does change a few scenes around and combines a few characters together. It’s good, but casting Jason Robards as Capone was a pretty poor choice. He looks nothing like Capone and is endlessly chewing the scenery in a very blustery manner. Another actor giving a pretty bad performance is George Segal as Peter Guesenberg. Apparently Segal thinks doing a bad James Cagney impression was the best way to play the part. Aside from that I thinks it’s an enjoyable movie with a lot of familiar faces in it.
I think Robards being miscast is one of the pleasures of this movie. He is a bit big or hammy in spots, but I've never minded actors as skilled as Robards doing that in particular roles/movies. Al Capone in a Roger Corman movie is that kind of role/movie. I also think Segal was fine.
@@anrun that’s perfectly fine if you have a different opinion. I’ll admit Robard’s performance being hammy can be appreciated. To me what the biggest problem is he looks nothing like Capone. He’s too tall and thin and lacks the round face.
@@66kprdwdAbsolutely, and I'm sure most in the 60s noticed that and had a laugh. Now, I suspect most younger watchers would have no idea what Capone looked like. Robards is hardly the only actor to have played an actual person he bore no real resemblance to and that includes other actors who have played Capone. I genuinely enjoy this film and have been meaning to buy a dvd or blu-ray of it for some time. Despite that, it is something of a guilty pleasure. I don't think it is truly a bad film, but I'm not sure I think it is objectively a good one either. So, seeing a great actor like Robards ham it up a little as Al Capone is one of the film's pleasures for me. I do understand if you and others find it harder to ignore.
@anrun While Robards did not look like the real Capone he did a good job. Capone was known as fearsome and ruthless not a cultured man whose own people feared him. Robards brought those qualities to the role.
@@marksloan7438 MAYBE BUT ONLY SCREEN PLAY WRITER DIRECTOR AND THE ACTOR KNOWS IT WAS SO QUICK A NORMAL CINEMA AUDIENCE COULD NEVER HEAR IT AS IT WAS SO QUICK
Jason Robards as Capone was totally miscast in this movie. Sometimes you wonder what these directors and casting people are smoking. The movie is not that bad, but it's hard to get past Robards if you know what Capone really looked like.
I don't necessarily think that an actor has to look like a historical figure to deliver a great performance. See: Rod Steiger as Napoleon Bonaparte in "Waterloos" (1970) but yeah I don't think Robards was great here. On the other hand I think Ralph Meeker nails "Bugs" Moran and most of the cast are pretty good.
@@kayvee6 Disagree. He showed Al Capone through temper, violence and carelessness. He portrayed Al in an artistic way. Just looking like Capone wouldn't do it.
@@Philbert-s2c You are confusing being miscast and being a good actor. Besides, Steiger, with his physiognomy and body profile was much closer to Napoleon than Robards to Capone.
@@deanronson6331 Well, in YOUR opinion. Again, I don't think Robards was that bad here but I don't really disagree that somebody else might have been better. Hell, I think Steiger himself (who I believe had already played Capone earlier) would have been better. On the other hand, this film, is FAR better than the 1975 crapfest with Ben Gazarra. That thing was just a mess.
Jason Robarts was ok, but he had the worst voice in Hollywood. Whe he furrthermore stuck a big cigar in his mouth, it´s hard to understand one word of his!
Not even close to being "horrible." It's a solid gangster flick from the late 60's. Good for it's time, if somewhat dated now. It features some great actors though, some of whom went on to great fame, like Jason Robards and George Segal.
Worst gangster movie ever made. Robards should have won the Academy Lemon Award for this. As believable as the tooth fairy. How did this ever get in a theatre? Really...
@@MegaWolfgang YEs, but he did not behave anything like him. Over the top performance that completely distorted the subject. All the over lit studio lights really in general a pathetic film. But if you liked it I am glad you saw a lot in that and perhaps learned a bit from it. Brotherly love from Australia..
You haven't seen many gangster movies then. This is dated and very much a product of the late 60's but it's miles better than a lot of the cheesy "Godfather" rip-offs that came out in the early to mid 70's.
then why watch the movie? If you spend your time watching stupid actors and taking time to comment then what does that make you? , and then on top of that you call people like David Canary stupid,
Growing up knowing my grandmother was born in 1911 & she passed in 2001,the amount of history she witnessed was mind blowing to me... my Father was born in 1946 he introduced me to me to this movie God rest them both. Great history lesson
You and I have something in common: one of my grandmothers was born in 1911, and both grandfathers fought in World War II.
She told me of the Roaring Twenties, the Great Depression, World War II. She mentioned other events such as the JFK assassination. One thing I distinctly remember her telling me was that, back when Vietnam was underway, she was thankful I was just a kid, and couldn’t go (drafted for military service).
God bless 🙌
My grandpa was 1909..dad was 1944.. none like them anymore. Real men 💪
한국어 번역
Robards acted brilliantly in this. A convincingly scary character. Thanks for the upload.
I love this famous narrator's voice.
Paul Frees 😉
Way better than what they put on the screen these days...
Depends. I would tend to agree on theatrical releases but shows on streaming services now are at a quality undreamt of in 1967.
This is one of the greatest Gangster movies ever made.
@@razorshark9320 NO WAY AS THE CLASSIC OF 1990 GOODFELLAS CANNOT BE EQUALED WHAT GREAT ACTORS AND THE DIRECTOR MARTIN SCORCESSE GAVE IT HIS BEST AND THAT ROLE BY JOE PESCI WHO WON BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR MADE IT A CLASSIC FOR YEARS TO COME
Back when gangsters had empires worth millions and class not like all these wannabe trash hippies theses days. Any gangsters back then would make any “blood gangsters” piss their low hanging pants and wouldn’t even come close to being on the same level as these guys back then.
I wouldn't go that far but it's better than some people make out. It's very much a docudrama in the style of the late 60's but I grew up watching it on local tv and still have a fondness for it.
Always been interested in the Massacre, don't know why I never saw this movie before. Very good.
I wish i could go back in time to be in Chicago in the 20's and 30's. Just to see how my favorite city truly was back then.
Wonderful!
START WATCHING AT 2:00 to avoid
the absolutely pointless beginning!
This movie and "The Godfather" are the best gangster movies of all time!!
White Heat, Little Caesar, Murder Inc, Key Largo, The Purple Gang, Scarface, The Public Enemy, Once Upon A Time in America, Kiss of Death, Smart Money, and the Valachi Papers are all great ones too! Lepke could’ve been better, I just didn’t like Tony Curtis as Lepke. David J. Stewart was a much better Lepke IMO
@@eamonwright7488 I agree 100%!!!😀
Left out Goodfellas.
GOODFELLAS
@@samkohen4589 Goodfellas, Casino, Carlitos way, Mean Streets, Billy Bathgate(ok), there’s more!
From 40:40-46:44 is the best scene in the movie. I love how it was acted.
They also have a black on white version, that was been ban in the early 60's.
You got to love the music in this movie
My great great-grandmother was born in 1925 she lived through the Great Depression when the stock market crashed in 1929 she lived to the Second World War the war in North Korea the Vietnam War all that other stuff but if my great-great-grandmother was alive today I don't think she'd make it
Roger Corman's one and only big budget A list movie. But being famous as a B list low budget director, the studio execs didn't trust him with a big budget. Basically the execs ongoing interference almost drove Corman insane. As a result, and despite offers, Corman never made another big budget film.
Vic Morrow, the actor, was born on this day in The Bronx, N Y.
Died by helicopter
@@victorwadsworth821 Along with 2 children who were also working illegally at night under California's Child Labour Law. John Landis who directed that segment of The Twilight Zone: The Movie was charged with manslaughter and breaching child labour laws and found not guilty despite all the evidence. He was buddies with Spielberg at that time as he was also the producer.
Love the history period stuff -great job: sets, costumes A+
Love This Story I watch all of the
No one drives in a convertible in Chicago in February
ha👍
The soft drink 7up is named for this. They have denied it of course. But back in the day it was a very popular event. The bottle even had a red dot. Seven up against the wall.
This was a nationwide event in 1929 headlines in all the papers. Now it's just another weekend in S. Chicago.
RIP Roger Corman.
Great movie
Mo green was in the movie
"We had to straighten him out." 🎞️🎥🎭🎬
To think that when this happened in 1929 , my darling late father was 5 years old and my darling late mother was born 8 months later !
My parents were that age
GREAT COPY OF THIS MOVIE
Great movie. Great actors.
You should watch the movie fugget about it
@𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐥𝐨
GREAT comment.
I'm old enough to remember when Roger Corman's movies were called "camp" and Class B movies. Today's generation calls them art. So good to see this change in people's viewpoints. Indeed, these movies are genuine art with considerable merit.
@@merccadoosis8847 This was the only A class film Corman ever did and he hated every minute of it.
@@Philbert-s2c
Not unusual for artists to be self effacing while disparaging their own work. Recall Rock star Jim Morrison of the Doors ~ he took his best book of poetry and threw it in the fire. His work was lost to history and never recovered.
The Thompson Sub Machine gun at 8:30 with the flat forend didn't come until the 1940's in WW2, and Charles "the fixer" Fischetti wasn't murdered, he died of a heart attack on April 11th 1951
The tommy gun was developed during WW1, however, it was not used in the war. It was said that the gun was extremely heavy. At least, that is my understanding of it. It was named after the inventor.
Trivia: this film has in its cast two of the three condemned men in Kubrick's great Paths of Glory: Ralph Meeker as George "Bugs" Moran and Joe Turkel as Jake "Greasy Thumb" Guzik.
I believe you, but my Tommy gun don't
They did not call me for my opinion on casting but I think Meeker would have been a better Capone as per looks . But the film is good, no matter.
Great action 🎉🎉
Happy 😊 St. Valentines 💘 Day!
The fact that the 'policemen' did not read those gentlemen their rights must have immediately raised questions by them about their real identity
Their rights as you say are called Miranda rights, which provided that suspects must be informed of their legal rights when they are placed under arrest, didn’t become a law until June 13,1966. So in 1929 when this took place, they wouldn’t have needed to read them their rights because it didn’t exist yet.
Interesting script
Never could figure out the role of the guy with the motorcycle, other than a messenger / cut out.
You think someone as dapper as Jack McGurn would wear a fedora while slurping on spagetti?
As a hood? Yes
That pool he got out of really was the pool of Capone, they turned it into a place you can visit. All Capone had to remember is where was all of his money when he got out of prison but he couldn't remember. His wife couldn't even make him remember because they lost everything and that money is still somewhere only Capone would know but back then they could have saved everything but Capone wasn't acting like the FEDs believed he was and they knew about the money because the book keeper could only tell them how many millions he should have but he has no clue what Capone did with it, all of that and he really was nobody after prison. He would never dream he would lose his mind that young and he thought 10 years, I'll be back making money just like before but God took his mind away. They could have picked a better actor to be Capone because he couldn't pull the role off , he didn't even act like Capone. I always thought like everyone else because all the movies made you believe the FBI found the man who could say and testify about how much money Capone had made. Then you learn the truth, the Mafia Lucky Luciano made and changed everything, they let him live after these murders because they all called Capone in and they knew his life was going to be voted on. He claimed he forgot about the rules and it's all new to every Boss and he just forgot about getting permission to have people killed. They gave him life but he will have to take a gun and get caught with it and you have to do so many months in jail but they left that up to Capone. He finally realized he wasn't running anything nomore, we all are on the same team but what could Capone do, he knew if he said, I'm not going to jail for that many months just because everyone thinks I had something to do with it but it's making it hard on everyone, the law will only allow but so much and the killing has to stop. He did do time in jail but they all agreed when he got out of jail and he was doing everything to be known as a gangster and nobody can touch him. He was doing everything John Gottie was doing. They decide to let him live but they made the book keeper testify and go to the FEDs. He was to never say anything about the Mafia but Capone has to learn, 10 years is a long time but the Mafia punished Capone, the FEDs take credit for but the Mafia doesn't care about that. They can make up their movies and nobody shot a G man like they show you in the movies. That would get you killed if you did kill one and to prove it, when Lucky was going to do his time and they found out a Boss was going to kill thr DA , Lucky had him killed and saved the mans life who put him away for 10 years. Those are just movies, nobody is allowed to kill a cop or FED because it goes against the rules, that is how you know the movies about him are fake. If the Mafia ever heard about Capone saying he wanted a fed dead and his family, Capone knew that was Death and they would kill Capone. He even knew I can't touch or kill anyone without permission and I can't tell a cop or FED your dead, lucky ended all of that. Capone agreed with omerta and the rules but Hollywood has to make you believe Capone killed cops and FEDs, that is a lie because he would die if he even thought about it
GREAT DIRECTOR GREAT ACTOR'S BUT EXCESSIVE VIOLENCE I WONDER HOW IT WENT THROUGH SENSORS AND WHAT GRADE CERTIFICATE
It's called life.
Late 60's were kind of an ifffy time for the ratings system. The old Hayes Code had collapsed and was totally ignored. Granted the violence here is nothing compared to films and tv in 2024.
IT'S ALWAYS TAX EVASION = EVADING YOUR TAXES = BECAUSE SUMMER DOESN'T PAY ANY TAXES....
Another Roger Corman film…RIP.
Machine Gun Kelly, didn't he become a singer later on his age?
18°F //not dressed to check out gunshots☝️
John and Hattie May didn't have 7 children, but he was one of seven siblings. A brother had to i.d. him instead of his wife.
I dont mind commercial, but HOLY s*** every 2 mins?
almost 2025 and you don’t have an ad blocker 😐
The biographical tidbits we get from the narrator, are they true?
Sì, è tutto vero.
Most of it 👍
This is a better than average Corman movie. It’s almost completely factual, but it does change a few scenes around and combines a few characters together.
It’s good, but casting Jason Robards as Capone was a pretty poor choice. He looks nothing like Capone and is endlessly chewing the scenery in a very blustery manner.
Another actor giving a pretty bad performance is George Segal as Peter Guesenberg. Apparently Segal thinks doing a bad James Cagney impression was the best way to play the part.
Aside from that I thinks it’s an enjoyable movie with a lot of familiar faces in it.
I think Robards being miscast is one of the pleasures of this movie. He is a bit big or hammy in spots, but I've never minded actors as skilled as Robards doing that in particular roles/movies. Al Capone in a Roger Corman movie is that kind of role/movie. I also think Segal was fine.
@@anrun that’s perfectly fine if you have a different opinion. I’ll admit Robard’s performance being hammy can be appreciated. To me what the biggest problem is he looks nothing like Capone. He’s too tall and thin and lacks the round face.
@@66kprdwdAbsolutely, and I'm sure most in the 60s noticed that and had a laugh. Now, I suspect most younger watchers would have no idea what Capone looked like. Robards is hardly the only actor to have played an actual person he bore no real resemblance to and that includes other actors who have played Capone. I genuinely enjoy this film and have been meaning to buy a dvd or blu-ray of it for some time. Despite that, it is something of a guilty pleasure. I don't think it is truly a bad film, but I'm not sure I think it is objectively a good one either. So, seeing a great actor like Robards ham it up a little as Al Capone is one of the film's pleasures for me. I do understand if you and others find it harder to ignore.
@anrun While Robards did not look like the real Capone he did a good job. Capone was known as fearsome and ruthless not a cultured man whose own people feared him. Robards brought those qualities to the role.
@@ericw3229 Yes, the miscasting was really only because of the physical differences.
One of mY Relations was one of the Gangsters who dressed up as a Policeman.
Young Jack Nicholson at 1:25:45 mark.
50:29 Facial sandwich rub, best part of this movie :o
the whole fight sequence very funny.. way tough dame.. good for her!
@@Michael-us5qxExactly.
SCARFACE = RED, LATER SWITCHED TO SCARFACE = GOLD / UNTOUCHABLES = GOLD COVER / THE GODFATHER = WHITE AND GOLD COVERS....
21:50 did he say "where he buys his DVD's"
YES CLEARLY I WAS SURPRISED IN THOSE YEARS DID THEY HAVE DVD OR EVEN VIDEOS BETAMAX ETC
That's BVDs, as in underwear. Honest mistake...
@@marksloan7438 MAYBE BUT ONLY SCREEN PLAY WRITER DIRECTOR AND THE ACTOR KNOWS IT WAS SO QUICK A NORMAL CINEMA AUDIENCE COULD NEVER HEAR IT AS IT WAS SO QUICK
"BVDS" are undewear. No, they didn't have dvds, or VHS even in 1967.
Jack Nicholson 114:34 ha ha, lol, before he was famous
It's more than possible. He was in several Roger Corman films between 1960 and when he finally hit big in "Easy Rider" (1969).
Jason Robards as Capone was totally miscast in this movie. Sometimes you wonder what these directors and casting people are smoking. The movie is not that bad, but it's hard to get past Robards if you know what Capone really looked like.
True. Robards was a competent actor and looked absolutely nothing like Capone. But like yourself I enjoyed watching this movie.
I don't necessarily think that an actor has to look like a historical figure to deliver a great performance. See: Rod Steiger as Napoleon Bonaparte in "Waterloos" (1970) but yeah I don't think Robards was great here. On the other hand I think Ralph Meeker nails "Bugs" Moran and most of the cast are pretty good.
@@kayvee6 Disagree. He showed Al Capone through temper, violence and carelessness. He portrayed Al in an artistic way. Just looking like Capone wouldn't do it.
@@Philbert-s2c You are confusing being miscast and being a good actor. Besides, Steiger, with his physiognomy and body profile was much closer to Napoleon than Robards to Capone.
@@deanronson6331 Well, in YOUR opinion. Again, I don't think Robards was that bad here but I don't really disagree that somebody else might have been better. Hell, I think Steiger himself (who I believe had already played Capone earlier) would have been better. On the other hand, this film, is FAR better than the 1975 crapfest with Ben Gazarra. That thing was just a mess.
Extreme amount of commercial (every 4min)
Just download, then watch later.
YT is getting unbearable with the ads. I'm about ready to stop using it.
55:26....He doesn't need a pillow.
I saw Jack Nicholson 😂 1:26:1
.. bas apni puri jindagi m ALHANCE nae yae hi ek galti kri thi .. St. Valentine's day .. aur pura chicago uskae against ho gya .. "scarface" ...
Good MOVIE 🍿🍿 C.but GOD Forbid
He rated capone out. Only capone kills like that
1:14:34
1:36:04 enthusiasm
I thought it was AI
1:04:15 hey Jack !
p.
1:36:38 *BATTER UP!*
Gansterssss
16:37
Jason Robarts was ok, but he had the worst voice in Hollywood. Whe he furrthermore stuck a big cigar in his mouth, it´s hard to understand one word of his!
He was miscast in this movie...doesn't resemble Scarface Al at all🤣
jason robards over-acts.. he is great in the o'neill stuff as that is what is required.. for him, less is more should be the motto..
What movies do you act in or direct ? Thought so. A RUclips profesional.. 😂
He's portraying capone
THEY SAID HERE'S WHAT'S COMING NEXT...... RED BABY....REDRUM....REDDDDDDDDD = DON'T STOP LIVING IN THE RED!!!!!!!
Fa
Really, really horrible movie.
Now you never have to watch it again Bob.
Rather... violent movie
Then make a better movie for us all to watch and enjoy. That's what I thought.
@@frankrolls6834Sorry he makes my name look bad. 😂😢😅
Not even close to being "horrible." It's a solid gangster flick from the late 60's. Good for it's time, if somewhat dated now. It features some great actors though, some of whom went on to great fame, like Jason Robards and George Segal.
Worst gangster movie ever made.
Robards should have won the Academy Lemon Award for this. As believable as the tooth fairy.
How did this ever get in a theatre? Really...
Have you ever heard the only recording of Al Capones voice? I was amassed. He sounds just like Jason Robards.
@@MegaWolfgang YEs, but he did not behave anything like him. Over the top performance that completely distorted the subject. All the over lit studio lights really in general a pathetic film.
But if you liked it I am glad you saw a lot in that and perhaps learned a bit from it.
Brotherly love from Australia..
@@bozotheclown935 yes it was filmed in 1967, while the actual crime scene was being demolished. Its a parking lot now.
Then make a better movie for us all to watch and enjoy. I mean you know so much about movies and acting. 😂😢😅
You haven't seen many gangster movies then. This is dated and very much a product of the late 60's but it's miles better than a lot of the cheesy "Godfather" rip-offs that came out in the early to mid 70's.
'Bunch of stupid actors trying to look tough.
Like Robert Dinero.
@@MulToyVerse People like him and Hanoi Jane are allowed million dollar careers.
then why watch the movie? If you spend your time watching stupid actors and taking time to comment then what does that make you? , and then on top of that you call people like David Canary stupid,
@bbennyj It makes me somebody who dosen't watch movies.
That's most action movie actor, by the way some of these guys serve in WW2. Can you say the same for your favourite celebrities.