Computational Chemistry 4.1 - Molecular Hamiltonian

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @EdgarVegaCarrasco
    @EdgarVegaCarrasco 2 года назад +3

    These quantum video series are a lifesaver! Thanks to this chanel I'm going to obtaing VG in my next examination.

  • @tomgraupner171
    @tomgraupner171 2 года назад +2

    Wonderful Presentation! One Slide with the information, clear and excellent explaination. That's excellent! Thanks a lot for this.

  • @masoudzankana4023
    @masoudzankana4023 3 месяца назад +1

    Thanks so much for your videos. I am a university lecturer. Honestly I use your videos to prepare some of my lectures. But if you guide me which book resources to use for both physical chemistry and quantum chemistry in order to study the subjects in detail, I will be thankful...

  • @mariamhasany5250
    @mariamhasany5250 4 года назад +3

    Do you have a video about the wave Equation? And its derivation ad details? I am so glad to have found this channel!

  • @Blackline60
    @Blackline60 6 лет назад +2

    I'm so glad to get new videos about QUantuum Chemistry ! I have a exam soon.

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  6 лет назад +2

      Best of luck as you continue your studies.

    • @Blackline60
      @Blackline60 6 лет назад +1

      Your work here on YT is so cool, keep going :) ! Almost the only one to speak correctly about Quantuum Chem.

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  6 лет назад +3

      Next set expected by end of June. I'd agree in terms of width of coverage, but there are certainly gems to be found here and there currently. Hopefully this course will be among the best online utilities in the field by the time of its completion, however far away that may be.

  • @jebremocampo9194
    @jebremocampo9194 4 года назад

    Thank God for people like you.

  • @mariohernandez1111
    @mariohernandez1111 6 лет назад

    IT'S HERE!!! I was looking forward to this so much.

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  6 лет назад +2

      I couldn't delay any longer, knowing that Mario was eagerly awaiting publication.

    • @mariohernandez1111
      @mariohernandez1111 6 лет назад +1

      TMP Chem Seems legit... Just in time for holidays here, you just gave me a productive way to spend it.

  • @sergeytretiakov6509
    @sergeytretiakov6509 5 лет назад +1

    Very nice explanations, thanks!

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  5 лет назад

      Thanks for watching, Sergey.

  • @souviknandi6329
    @souviknandi6329 4 года назад

    THANK U very much , i was having so problem to understand it before, thank uuu

  • @malojoly1581
    @malojoly1581 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks a lot for these videos, it has been really helpful

  • @anjanchakraborty1665
    @anjanchakraborty1665 5 лет назад +1

    Could you please help me to solve these problems: Indicate if Hartee-folk(HF) energy depends on 1. The Molecular energy co-efficient 2. The MO energies 3. The choice of geometrical coordinates (internal vs cartesian coordinates) --Motivate your answers?

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  5 лет назад

      Hi Anjan. By energy co-efficient I'll assume you mean C matrix coefficients which constitute the molecular orbitals (which affect MO energies). The MO energies, are then one of the components in the HF energy. And the geometry coordinates (along with the nuclear charges, number of electrons, and choice of basis functions) determine what the C matrix coefficients are.

  • @sriram.s6297
    @sriram.s6297 8 месяцев назад

    On expanding the hamiltonian, why is there a negative sign in front of the potential energy of the nucleus?

    • @dirklutz2818
      @dirklutz2818 8 месяцев назад

      because the potential energy increases

  • @dwaipayanroychowdhury5279
    @dwaipayanroychowdhury5279 5 лет назад

    Say there were three nuclei or electrons..by taking the summation like you did (b=a+1) wouldn't you discount the 1,3 nucleur or electronic repulsive interaction??

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  5 лет назад

      Those terms would be included. The point of pairwise double-sums is to avoid double counting, and self interactions. We only want to count each unique pair once. In your example, with 3 nuclei, we start with a = 1, b = a+1 = 1+1 = 2. That generates the 1,2 interaction. We then increment b in the inner loop, b = b+1 = 2+1 = 3, which gives us 1,3 (since 3 is still 3, so the loop ends, and we increment a = a+1 = 1+1 = 2. The inner loop gives b = 3, and we have the 2,3 term. B then = 4 which ends that loop, A is increased to 3, B is 4 again which ends the loop, A is then increased to 4, and the outer loop ends.
      The result of this is that 3 interacting pairs contribute to the energy once, and only once, each: 1,2; 1,3; and 2,3.

    • @dwaipayanroychowdhury5279
      @dwaipayanroychowdhury5279 5 лет назад

      @@TMPChem I get it now.."a" not equal to "b" is invoked as usual.

  • @apburner1
    @apburner1 6 лет назад

    First.