I think a lot of us forget to apply this logic when the situation drastically changes. You always want to reevaluate the entire demands of the position once a transformation such as this happens. Agad definitely knows his stuff
I you want to learn how to win after blunders, find an old copy of the book "Chess for Tigers" by Simon Webb. There is a whole chapter just on recovering bad positions. It's by a long shot the one book that helped me win most games. And everything still applies after decades.
@@ndnd7614 actually Jergus has gained rating in January 2023 meaning that he performed a bit better than would have been predicted by his ELO rating so far this month!
This is like getting dropped 3 times in the first round, and then dropping him one time in every round until the TKO in round 5. That knight capture at the end was a walk away KO. NASTY
Absolutely shocking in two respects. One, that a GM could blunder a piece on move 6 in classical. And two, that his opponent GM doesn't immediately go for an offered piece trade after a blunder on move 6
Losing material will make people act with more intrepidity, possession often confines our freedom and bridles our passion. Thank you for this wonderful game.
You can summarise this game as: White:"imagine being a nearly 3 thousand ELO player and make a theory mistake", Black:"imagine being a nearly 3 thousand ELO player and not being able to convert a theory mistake"
Schallopp's defense to the King's gambit is a slight edge to Black but it is very complicated. Fischer's defense is the most stubborn. Ian Nepomniachtchi's King's gambit games are definitely worth studying.
I love the King's Gambit XD but I must say... 5:22 That position looked absolutely repulsive. I think I once ended up in something that looked like this and I dearly just wanted to resign.
After a couple games of Jergús it seems he is a little impatient. He should reflect on this tournament and come back stronger, I would much like to see him in such games.
I used play against the masters in simuls all the time in high school. One of whom was a Renown IM (later became a) GM with initials of BF. He spotted pieces and I pulled everything off the board and it came down to the extra rook he spotted me.
He blundered the piece but settle for Pawns.definitely white will captured the piece and not save the pawn.On a position too early and full of material on board that is not compensation
Amin Tabatabaei beat Wesley So last year in grand Prix and Wesley So thought Amin prepared the move. :D That was hilarious. I have a clip on it. But yeah good for Amin. E even threw a match against an Israeli player in 2022 sunway but still tied with Niemann for 2nd place though lost to Hans in playoffs in Armageddon.
This is the worst/ best feeling in chess. 😆😆 Seeing your opponent blunder, but you aren't able to close them out. Conversely, you blunder but stay in the fight and score the comeback victory.
2nd comment: Notice how both agadmator and Gothamchess don't cover Wesley So games in Tata Steel? I mean besides Nodirbek and Anish, Wesley is the only other player currently ahead of Magnus. #suggestion
At 1:34 when you’re doing the hypothetical, could White take the pawn with the Queen, put the king in check, then grab blacks knight? Why does he take with the knight there instead?
It is devastating when you lose a clear advantage, but you also learn on how to keep it next time. I had a frustrating game where I trapped opponent's queen, then he equalized and later had a better position.
I went forward in time. To view alternate futures. To see all the possible outcomes of the coming conflict. How many did you see? Fourteen million, six hundred and five. How many did we win? One.
He kept his extra piece but still lost. Like getting the gun from an assailant's hand for him to knock you out with a punch. The plan is always secondary to the position. Or the position creates the plan, not the other way around. ....from Ireland.
I don't see why white would be upset losing this miserable position. He is just 1 point of material ahead and he is so far behind in development, it's sad. I've been about 2000 for 30 years and since I stopped counting pawns and stuff, and began to play like a maniac, I started crushing 2300 to 2500 engines. Sacrificing material by just leaving it absent-mindedly is something worth exploring more. It takes so much time to threaten a piece and then capture it, and then go back to continue defending when the attacker gets 2 more pieces involved during that time.
All I heard was a GM played like me in the opening and blundered a piece by move 6. To be more precise, I actually heard that my current chess chops are basically GM level...and that I'm very much on the verge of becoming a super GM. It's nice getting ratification like this. Totes unnecessary. But nice nonetheless.
, Dear Agadmator, I love your channel and appreciate your extended knowledge in gaming possibilities… but allow me to suggest that you go too far in suggesting alternatives and expanding possibilities, really too far, that I am sorry to say your comments have become confusing… even pedantic and make me lose interest in the initial game…! Why do you have to mention that a certain move was played by so and so twenty or fifty years ago…?! then switch to another memory… think a little… cite another insignificant memory and keep diverting attention from the game before you…!! As much as I like your channel, and keep watching it, believe me… it is truly boring… and you do it all the time…!! This kind of discourse interrupts the flow of interest in what is before you, and on several occasions I had to push the arrow forward to put an end to what you are saying and recapture the game!! Sorry…! I know that you have no time to read this…! I wish you would…!
"Its in the spirit of the King's gambit opening. But your opponent blundered a piece. So you don't care about the spirit of king's gambit" - agadmator
Do you really need to highlight it.
I think a lot of us forget to apply this logic when the situation drastically changes. You always want to reevaluate the entire demands of the position once a transformation such as this happens. Agad definitely knows his stuff
He does not blunder. He Gambit the night
3:36
Keep making more videos about winning games after blundering pieces and I might learn to win.
Sadly I laughed so hard because I relate too much
I you want to learn how to win after blunders, find an old copy of the book "Chess for Tigers" by Simon Webb. There is a whole chapter just on recovering bad positions. It's by a long shot the one book that helped me win most games. And everything still applies after decades.
#suggestions
So relatable 😂
😂😂
poor guy, lost two games in a row, one to a brilliancy, and another despite having a winning position early 😔
He’s feeling some pain, shit sucks
He seems overrated, playing so poorly for his rating
If I were him, I'd not play games in January
@@ndnd7614 actually Jergus has gained rating in January 2023 meaning that he performed a bit better than would have been predicted by his ELO rating so far this month!
The King's Gambit always delivers a tactical game!
When you win after a blunder, it is a sacrifice :D
King’s gambit. Tabatabaei variation.
THANK YOU, that was my suggestion!👏👏❤
Tata Steel never disappoints! Pulling this off with the black pieces is just amazing.
Blunders a Piece on Move 6 AND WINS!
Every low elo game:
This is like getting dropped 3 times in the first round, and then dropping him one time in every round until the TKO in round 5. That knight capture at the end was a walk away KO. NASTY
King's Gambit is the gift that keeps on giving
The Queens Gambit?
Poor Pecháč, hopefully he gets a positive feature here soon with the King's Gambit
He's facing the Evans Gambit now so... I'm nervous
@NostalgicDouchebag oh really ? Agadmator must show that game after it finishes
I love the King's gambit. I often win games after blundering minor pieces. My opponents get overconfident after being up a piece lol
Absolutely shocking in two respects. One, that a GM could blunder a piece on move 6 in classical. And two, that his opponent GM doesn't immediately go for an offered piece trade after a blunder on move 6
He was probably in so much shock that his opponent blundered that, that he just had a brain fart over the board.
You're telling me a 161660 rated player hung a piece on move 6?!
Lol
We don't do that here
272700*
Losing material will make people act with more intrepidity, possession often confines our freedom and bridles our passion. Thank you for this wonderful game.
"He started playing with engine precision"
One man’s blunder is another man’s gambit
Was waiting eagerly for this game!!
Damn ...Jerguš would have been devastated..!
Tabatabaei Gambit is on the board!
The moment when a GM and I have something in common
"the hardest game to win is a won game" Lasker (or so I've heard)
Jergus featuring on Agad's channel twice in 2 days .. only on the losing side in both games .. Feel for him
Amin in his best is a beast on fire!! 🔥
Tough loss good game competitive for awhile Black did turn the tide in his favor for sure Thanks for the Game and the Call
perfect example why never resign and give up hope
Amin's gambit accepted
Only one with a true fighting spirit wouldn't resign there. Kudos to Amin
Plot twist: The GM's real rating was 161660
?
My favorite opening. Loved it!
You can summarise this game as: White:"imagine being a nearly 3 thousand ELO player and make a theory mistake", Black:"imagine being a nearly 3 thousand ELO player and not being able to convert a theory mistake"
Thank you Agadmator!
Schallopp's defense to the King's gambit is a slight edge to Black but it is very complicated. Fischer's defense is the most stubborn. Ian Nepomniachtchi's King's gambit games are definitely worth studying.
I’m still waiting for him to say “and it was on move 6….. that he knew he fucked up”
The rating diff speaks for itself.
A perfect quote for the game like these. ❤️
I love the King's Gambit XD but I must say...
5:22 That position looked absolutely repulsive. I think I once ended up in something that looked like this and I dearly just wanted to resign.
I am never again going to play the King's Gambit after seeing this.
What a tournament for Peschac :(
After a couple games of Jergús it seems he is a little impatient. He should reflect on this tournament and come back stronger, I would much like to see him in such games.
I used play against the masters in simuls all the time in high school. One of whom was a Renown IM (later became a) GM with initials of BF. He spotted pieces and I pulled everything off the board and it came down to the extra rook he spotted me.
This game got my head banging on almost every move...wow!
True, he blundered a minor piece but he was up two pawns all the way through.
He blundered the piece but settle for Pawns.definitely white will captured the piece and not save the pawn.On a position too early and full of material on board that is not compensation
It seems King's Gambit accepted has improved considerably since Fischer -Spasky time.
Amin Tabatabaei beat Wesley So last year in grand Prix and Wesley So thought Amin prepared the move. :D
That was hilarious. I have a clip on it.
But yeah good for Amin. E even threw a match against an Israeli player in 2022 sunway but still tied with Niemann for 2nd place though lost to Hans in playoffs in Armageddon.
Very complicated, but supreme game!
Saw this coming on channel yesterday
Let's call this the inverted Muzio
This is the worst/ best feeling in chess. 😆😆
Seeing your opponent blunder, but you aren't able to close them out.
Conversely, you blunder but stay in the fight and score the comeback victory.
@ 3:00 why wouldn't you move the pawn to defend the knight from the White Queen?
I love these lower gm tussles....real Fischer random battles.
2nd comment: Notice how both agadmator and Gothamchess don't cover Wesley So games in Tata Steel? I mean besides Nodirbek and Anish, Wesley is the only other player currently ahead of Magnus. #suggestion
At 1:34 when you’re doing the hypothetical, could White take the pawn with the Queen, put the king in check, then grab blacks knight? Why does he take with the knight there instead?
Hope Amin didn’t go to the bathroom and check his phone after blundering the piece
Amazing game! Thanks!
I just got a headache after watching this game 🤯
Wow! A gm blunder a piece but won then
lol this game is the most king's gambit thing ever
It is devastating when you lose a clear advantage, but you also learn on how to keep it next time. I had a frustrating game where I trapped opponent's queen, then he equalized and later had a better position.
Looks like I am something of a GM myself.
Anf we have other matches where there are 0 blunders and 0 mistakes and you lose 😭
Me for the WIN. Give up that rook and push pawns across the finish.
I went forward in time. To view alternate futures. To see all the possible outcomes of the coming conflict.
How many did you see?
Fourteen million, six hundred and five.
How many did we win?
One.
Jergus should force queens trade after opponent blonder piece.
Engine like precision ..very fishy!
1:34 why queen takes pawn and wins a piece doesnt work?
Must be pretty frustrating to lose a piece up in the opening and also in the endgame.
He kept his extra piece but still lost. Like getting the gun from an assailant's hand for him to knock you out with a punch. The plan is always secondary to the position. Or the position creates the plan, not the other way around. ....from Ireland.
There is a thin line between blunder and sacrifice..
Instructive !
Jergus is hexed man!
now i dont know if thats a blunder or he gambit a knight..
00
Amazing!
I may study this one...
Amin won in the style of Jennifer Yu
From goa,interesting Variationens,topp
What a game!
I don't see why white would be upset losing this miserable position. He is just 1 point of material ahead and he is so far behind in development, it's sad.
I've been about 2000 for 30 years and since I stopped counting pawns and stuff, and began to play like a maniac, I started crushing 2300 to 2500 engines. Sacrificing material by just leaving it absent-mindedly is something worth exploring more. It takes so much time to threaten a piece and then capture it, and then go back to continue defending when the attacker gets 2 more pieces involved during that time.
Joey the anime man’s lost brother?
Eh?
That sounds impressive and all, but I've blundered my queen many, many times, and sometimes I've come back and won. So there's that.
All I heard was a GM played like me in the opening and blundered a piece by move 6. To be more precise, I actually heard that my current chess chops are basically GM level...and that I'm very much on the verge of becoming a super GM. It's nice getting ratification like this. Totes unnecessary. But nice nonetheless.
Amin is definitely a 2700 material. 💪💪.
Yeah losing a piece on move 6 is super GM level
Challengers is more fun than Masters
This comment almost as fast as agadmator posting a video.
if it would be that fast, you could not read it, it would speak for itself
brutal
I might not be demoralised again and win the game, after losing a piece, but, unfortunately, i dont play against GM
No no no, Qxe2 is the threat agad, much sexier 6:21
The problem with winning any material is that you need to expend a tempo to win that material. Sometimes expending that tempo is expensive. :)
Pechac should just retire after this tornament. 😵
nice
#And in this position there's nothing to be done!
Will be more popular for your shirts
But don't forget my commission
sometimes i blunder my queen and win, Chess is unpredictable like my boy Hans said chess speaks for its self
Please add nationality too with rating
Bro how im 2200 rated n i think i can win this one its just simple roll trade if u winning
AlgorithmFood!
🎉😂
Pls., keep the secret. Don't tell us who is winning by the tittle of your video.,.
Wait so you're tellin me a 1600 rated player hung a piece on move 6?
*2600, but yes
GMs never prepare for a blunder variation, so yeah, leaving known territory with a "surprised/shocked" face for the price of material imbalance
@@dodekaedius "Your opponent can't know your next move if you dont know it yourself"
If you blunder a piece and win, then it was just an unsound sacrifice
,
Dear Agadmator,
I love your channel and appreciate your extended knowledge in gaming possibilities… but allow me to suggest that you go too far in suggesting alternatives and expanding possibilities, really too far, that I am sorry to say your comments have become confusing… even pedantic and make me lose interest in the initial game…!
Why do you have to mention that a certain move was played by so and so twenty or fifty years ago…?! then switch to another memory… think a little… cite another insignificant memory and keep diverting attention from the game before you…!! As much as I like your channel, and keep watching it, believe me… it is truly boring… and you do it all the time…!!
This kind of discourse interrupts the flow of interest in what is before you, and on several occasions I had to push the arrow forward to put an end to what you are saying and recapture the game!!
Sorry…! I know that you have no time to read this…! I wish you would…!