"Faul" indeed does look bird-like to me too. He has a different nose that looks like a beak. He has a wider palate, longer head, is actually right handed, is taller, wore a different shoe size.
Faul is a extremely arrogant person. The reason he co-wrote "Memoires of Billy Shears" is cause he wants his own name on the records! "Pride always comes before a fall" He is crazy if he really believes everybody is gonna accept him as Billy? Luciferians are always about their ego.
I truly believe OG Paul is dead. The guy everyone knows as Paul (since 1966) was a session musician who could sing like anyone. The only conspiracy theory I believe.
I know about False flags, ET cover-up, MK Ultra and all the rest, but I never believed this "Conspiracy Theory"? It was until I saw a compilation were friends of Faul clearly says "Billy" to Faul and until I read The "Memoires of Billy Shears", published by Paul McCartneys publishing company and with parts of the songs they didnt write. E U Harriet who wrote the "Memoires of Billy Shears" would be sued and have to pay for copy rights for all the lyrics if Paul wouldnt allow it?
The different cover-ups and Conspiracy theories ties into each other. Ive read Michael Cremos "Forbidden Archeology" recently and its totally mind-blowing how gullible people are when they are ready to believe anything their authorities claims?
Some really cool Beatles memorabilia you have! My take on this is that Billy had time to tell his story to the ghost writer either directly or indirectly (through giving him journals and/or dictated audio notes) because Billy does not really have a rigorous touring or songwriting schedule like he did in the past. There's also evidence that Billy himself is using a shorter double of himself sometimes to perform on stage. So he's had plenty of time, and the material in the book has been compiled over decades. He has wanted to get off his chest for many years before he passes on. It's not like the book was written in 3-6 months or something. First edition was out 9-9-09 (15 years ago) and there have been other editions since.
The evidence is there, the eye colour is different and even their shoe size was different, and people who were close to the band used to refer to Faul. as William. But once you know who or what is behind it all, then it all starts to fit into place, and the deeper you go the darker it gets.
@@nicedoppy2077 See also the new book, "Forbidden Fruit" by Sharon Clemons. She was interviewed by Sage of Quay (Mike Williams) about two months ago. It was a great interview. She believes that it was a ritual murder, and that it happened after a Seattle concert in August 1966. It was no mere traffic accident -- that was a cover story to justify the replacement.
@@barrypopik9315 ...maan, sometimes I don't understand it, but nowadays our society has too many dark things around... what a shame!... Ok thanks for mentioning the book u recommend!!
Is there anything in the book about the Tracey Ullmann video called They Don't Know ? Shepherd is in it along with a few hidden jokes about the replacement.
Ringo doesn't look like Ringo in the picture at 7.00 (Magical Mystery Tour promo?) - I had a large poster of another shot from that shoot, wish I still had it. Those photos are some seriously strange stuff.
Can any of you PID believes please explain the "James Paul McCartney" TV special 1973, (here on RUclips for everyone to see) at the 20 minutes mark there's a McCartney family get together in a Liverpool pub, they are all getting pissed (drunk) calling him Paul singing along with him and showering him with kisses! Now how is it that his dad, aunties, uncles and cousins, can not see it's not their Paul, the one they have grown up with, the one they have always known, but he's in fact an Imposter named Billy!
There is even a clue in the Tracey Ullmann video for They Don't Know in which Shears has a cameo appearance. Another beloved British icon who was not what they appeared to be was Carol Hersee. It's explained in a video called Hidden Meaning Of Test Card F
Good question posed, toward the end of this video. Paul McCartney has frequently been on the road performing, probably also writing songs and rehearsing (this is 15-plus years ago when he was considerably younger than now, before, and up to, 2009). So where did this imposter find the time to team-write a 666-page book, published in 2009? Where did he find the time? HOW DID HE DO THIS???
It is difficult for me, a Beatles' fan, to fathom why people would believe this. It's hard to find now on RUclips, but I found interviews of Paul McCartney days apart, before and after, his supposed day of death in 1966. When people reference the line "He blew his mind out in a car," they may not be aware that Paul wrote the second half of that song, "A Day in the Life", in 1967. Paul also wrote most of the songs on that album, Sgt Peppers. We know a lot about Lennon and how controlling he could be (Just ask George). Does anyone really believe that Lennon would allow a fake stand-in to virtually take control of what he considered was his band from the inception? We saw this in Peter Jackson's Get Back film. Does anyone actually believe that an unknown look-alike, that nobody ever recognised before, who was a left-handed bass player, master piano player, song writer and vocalist could come in and take over The Beatles? It's time to stop all this. I have worked with a lot of journalists; generally they aren't very bright or creative; and they write a lot of garbage. This was an insider joke that The Beatles cooked up for a laugh. Please don't take it seriously.
I hear you. I am not convinced that Paul died. But from pics I have seen in the early days of Beatlemania, leads me to believe there was, at the very least, a double of Paul. Different shots from the same year he has different ears, different nose and he’s magically several inches taller than John. It indisputable. Maybe Paul had a biological twin, maybe he wore prosthetics and elevator shoes. But early on why would he do that? Maybe that’s where the idea for The Nurk twins came from. To me both John and Paul look way different in 67-70 than they did in 62-66. As a kid I remember thinking that I didn’t recognise who was on the cover of Peppers, Abbey Road etc. Even their voices, speaking & singing, seemed to have changed in the later years. Those are thoughts I had YEARS before I knew about the PID thing. I mean, when you look at Jagger and hear his voice over the years, you know it’s Jagger. When you look at Sinatra and hear his voice….even in his final days…you knew it was Sinatra. But John sounds completely different from 67 onwards. Paul’s doesn’t sound the same either and he somehow learned to become an accomplished pianist. Another thing I am sure of is, they didn’t write their own songs. At least not between 63-67. Mike Williams proves this with his Rubber Soul analysis. They were not good musicians as can be heard in the Cavern Club and Star Club recordings. There are too many holes and “unicorns” in the official story that leads me to believe that at the very least they were a manufacturer boy band.
@@duderama6750 No facts eh? This ridiculous myth was a joke started by The Beatles. So how can this ongoing ridiculous rumour be debunked? Well, there is a press interview with The Beatles after their 1966 tour June/July. So they myth goes that Paul died in November 1966. But here he is outside EMI in December 1966; it's the same Paul with a moustache alive and well, same voice, exactly the same looks, reflecting on why they gave up concert performances. Previously, the journo interviews a different looking John, and the myth then starts that John is dead because he has a different haircut, a moustache and glasses. Lots of references here to that idiot Mike Williams who not only thinks Paul is Billy Shears but insists that The Beatles couldn't write songs. Then they go into the EMI studio and write and record Sgt Peppers, the most successful album in the history of music.
You might enjoy the book by Peter Brown who interviewed all four Beatles “The End of the Beatles” It’s just been published and is really insightful, Just discovered you’re podcast interview on sea of quay and that was fascinating.
There is plenty of pre and post 1966 Beatle memorabilia that would have pre and post Paul DNA that could be compared and shut this whole theory down. It hasn't been done because it would shut down all the money made off of the conspiracy theory.
The fact is nobody knows for sure either way so for one to think this is BS well how do they know. I don’t have to know anything but myself because there’s no way I can prove anything else o4 that I care to. One side says your an idiot if you think that’s Paul and the other says your an idiot if you think he died.
It's clear as the nose on his face. Faul is not Paul! I knew it as a child when they did the switch! 😮 How can people NOT see it isn't Paul? I don't believe Paul died either I think he wanted out. I believe he's John Halliday now in Liverpool.
@@KathleenBarrow-gh2ey You were more observant than me. I didn't realize Paul had been replaced until about 2017 when I saw videos on youtube. However, even then it took me a few years of studying videos and photos to be sure of this and learn to recognize the differences between the two men. Many people, me included, believe that the original Paul has died. Sage of Quay says he believes this because no one has seen the original Paul after the replacement. Paul is not John Halliday. I have looked at videos of John Halliday. John Halliday does not look much like Paul, other than his ears stick out as did Paul's. Halliday seems to have blue eyes, and I see no resemblance at all. He is also supposed to be younger than Paul. There are photos of Halliday when he was young, and he does not look like Paul.
🎸To get behind the scenes videos and stories got to my Patreon channel www.patreon.com/PTPOP
"Faul" indeed does look bird-like to me too. He has a different nose that looks like a beak. He has a wider palate, longer head, is actually right handed, is taller, wore a different shoe size.
Faul is a extremely arrogant person. The reason he co-wrote "Memoires of Billy Shears" is cause he wants his own name on the records! "Pride always comes before a fall" He is crazy if he really believes everybody is gonna accept him as Billy? Luciferians are always about their ego.
I truly believe OG Paul is dead. The guy everyone knows as Paul (since 1966) was a session musician who could sing like anyone. The only conspiracy theory I believe.
To add: I've done a ton of research on this and can't even touch on all the evidence. There are some excellent PID channels on RUclips.
I know about False flags, ET cover-up, MK Ultra and all the rest, but I never believed this "Conspiracy Theory"? It was until I saw a compilation were friends of Faul clearly says "Billy" to Faul and until I read The "Memoires of Billy Shears", published by Paul McCartneys publishing company and with parts of the songs they didnt write. E U Harriet who wrote the "Memoires of Billy Shears" would be sued and have to pay for copy rights for all the lyrics if Paul wouldnt allow it?
The guy who replaced Paul was originally a ghost musician who was signed as a session musician to the Beatles in 1964.
The only conspiracy you believe? Then you're not awake yet.
The different cover-ups and Conspiracy theories ties into each other. Ive read Michael Cremos "Forbidden Archeology" recently and its totally mind-blowing how gullible people are when they are ready to believe anything their authorities claims?
Some really cool Beatles memorabilia you have! My take on this is that Billy had time to tell his story to the ghost writer either directly or indirectly (through giving him journals and/or dictated audio notes) because Billy does not really have a rigorous touring or songwriting schedule like he did in the past. There's also evidence that Billy himself is using a shorter double of himself sometimes to perform on stage. So he's had plenty of time, and the material in the book has been compiled over decades. He has wanted to get off his chest for many years before he passes on. It's not like the book was written in 3-6 months or something. First edition was out 9-9-09 (15 years ago) and there have been other editions since.
The evidence is there, the eye colour is different and even their shoe size was different, and people who were close to the band used to refer to Faul. as William. But once you know who or what is behind it all, then it all starts to fit into place, and the deeper you go the darker it gets.
who is behind of all this ?
@@nicedoppy2077 Those who are in control of the world
@@Ratsotone who are them....??
@@nicedoppy2077 See also the new book, "Forbidden Fruit" by Sharon Clemons. She was interviewed by Sage of Quay (Mike Williams) about two months ago. It was a great interview. She believes that it was a ritual murder, and that it happened after a Seattle concert in August 1966. It was no mere traffic accident -- that was a cover story to justify the replacement.
@@barrypopik9315 ...maan, sometimes I don't understand it, but nowadays our society has too many dark things around... what a shame!...
Ok thanks for mentioning the book u recommend!!
Is there anything in the book about the Tracey Ullmann video called They Don't Know ? Shepherd is in it along with a few hidden jokes about the replacement.
The best channel on the subject of Paul's death and replacement is the Sage of Quay's "Paul is Dead" channel.
Ringo doesn't look like Ringo in the picture at 7.00 (Magical Mystery Tour promo?) - I had a large poster of another shot from that shoot, wish I still had it. Those photos are some seriously strange stuff.
As a kid I didn’t recognise Lennon after 66. Just believed it was him because THEY said it was.
I too, found the book initially overwhelming. It's a lot to absorb. George Martin's son read the Audible version of the book by the way...
Giles did?
@@Ptpop Actually it's Gregory Martin
Can any of you PID believes please explain the "James Paul McCartney" TV special 1973, (here on RUclips for everyone to see) at the 20 minutes mark there's a McCartney family get together in a Liverpool pub, they are all getting pissed (drunk) calling him Paul singing along with him and showering him with kisses! Now how is it that his dad, aunties, uncles and cousins, can not see it's not their Paul, the one they have grown up with, the one they have always known, but he's in fact an Imposter named Billy!
There is even a clue in the Tracey Ullmann video for They Don't Know in which Shears has a cameo appearance. Another beloved British icon who was not what they appeared to be was Carol Hersee. It's explained in a video called
Hidden Meaning Of Test Card F
Tracey's video was great. A great song and video. Now, I see the clue in the title: "They Don't Know."
@@SusanGoldberg-l9p
Yes and also the steering wheel of the car being driven by Shepherd is covered in sheepskin.
Looking forward to your review, they do look and behave differently.
To me the behavior is the key! Total opposites.
Even if it was not true, they did a damn good job keeping up the consperacy all these years. it keep him alive.
the first one you took... in french.. can you make a video showing some of the pages?.. it would be so interesting to know what that is...
Good idea. I’ll give it a shot.
Good question posed, toward the end of this video. Paul McCartney has frequently been on the road performing, probably also writing songs and rehearsing (this is 15-plus years ago when he was considerably younger than now, before, and up to, 2009). So where did this imposter find the time to team-write a 666-page book, published in 2009? Where did he find the time? HOW DID HE DO THIS???
None of it will make sense unless you have a solid understand freemasonry, the occult, and social engineering.
It is difficult for me, a Beatles' fan, to fathom why people would believe this. It's hard to find now on RUclips, but I found interviews of Paul McCartney days apart, before and after, his supposed day of death in 1966. When people reference the line "He blew his mind out in a car," they may not be aware that Paul wrote the second half of that song, "A Day in the Life", in 1967. Paul also wrote most of the songs on that album, Sgt Peppers. We know a lot about Lennon and how controlling he could be (Just ask George). Does anyone really believe that Lennon would allow a fake stand-in to virtually take control of what he considered was his band from the inception? We saw this in Peter Jackson's Get Back film. Does anyone actually believe that an unknown look-alike, that nobody ever recognised before, who was a left-handed bass player, master piano player, song writer and vocalist could come in and take over The Beatles? It's time to stop all this. I have worked with a lot of journalists; generally they aren't very bright or creative; and they write a lot of garbage. This was an insider joke that The Beatles cooked up for a laugh. Please don't take it seriously.
Watch Mike Williams Sage of Quay to help understand this. The controllers of our World have us in a show. The World is a stage.
I hear you. I am not convinced that Paul died. But from pics I have seen in the early days of Beatlemania, leads me to believe there was, at the very least, a double of Paul. Different shots from the same year he has different ears, different nose and he’s magically several inches taller than John. It indisputable. Maybe Paul had a biological twin, maybe he wore prosthetics and elevator shoes. But early on why would he do that? Maybe that’s where the idea for The Nurk twins came from.
To me both John and Paul look way different in 67-70 than they did in 62-66. As a kid I remember thinking that I didn’t recognise who was on the cover of Peppers, Abbey Road etc. Even their voices, speaking & singing, seemed to have changed in the later years. Those are thoughts I had YEARS before I knew about the PID thing.
I mean, when you look at Jagger and hear his voice over the years, you know it’s Jagger.
When you look at Sinatra and hear his voice….even in his final days…you knew it was Sinatra. But John sounds completely different from 67 onwards. Paul’s doesn’t sound the same either and he somehow learned to become an accomplished pianist.
Another thing I am sure of is, they didn’t write their own songs. At least not between 63-67. Mike Williams proves this with his Rubber Soul analysis.
They were not good musicians as can be heard in the Cavern Club and Star Club recordings. There are too many holes and “unicorns” in the official story that leads me to believe that at the very least they were a manufacturer boy band.
It was much more than a laugh. It's just arrogance that makes you think you know what you're talking about.
The rabbit hole is deeper than you know.
@@duderama6750 No facts eh? This ridiculous myth was a joke started by The Beatles. So how can this ongoing ridiculous rumour be debunked? Well, there is a press interview with The Beatles after their 1966 tour June/July. So they myth goes that Paul died in November 1966. But here he is outside EMI in December 1966; it's the same Paul with a moustache alive and well, same voice, exactly the same looks, reflecting on why they gave up concert performances. Previously, the journo interviews a different looking John, and the myth then starts that John is dead because he has a different haircut, a moustache and glasses. Lots of references here to that idiot Mike Williams who not only thinks Paul is Billy Shears but insists that The Beatles couldn't write songs. Then they go into the EMI studio and write and record Sgt Peppers, the most successful album in the history of music.
Boy R u Dumb.
Paul is Dead
Miss Him Miss Him…
Phil Ackriill aka Vivian Stanshall aka Paul McCartney follow the clues
Also, why did JPM pose in a trunk for the Y and T album before he was replaced?
You might enjoy the book by Peter Brown who interviewed all four Beatles “The End of the Beatles”
It’s just been published and is really insightful,
Just discovered you’re podcast interview on sea of quay and that was fascinating.
Paul is so dead it isn't funny.
I heard the rumore in 1969 Notre Dame high school
He's doing pretty good for a dead man, it's a complete load of bollocks
There is plenty of pre and post 1966 Beatle memorabilia that would have pre and post Paul DNA that could be compared and shut this whole theory down. It hasn't been done because it would shut down all the money made off of the conspiracy theory.
The fact is nobody knows for sure either way so for one to think this is BS well how do they know. I don’t have to know anything but myself because there’s no way I can prove anything else o4 that I care to. One side says your an idiot if you think that’s Paul and the other says your an idiot if you think he died.
Nothing like sitting on the fence!!
We do know for sure. Paul was replaced.
It's clear as the nose on his face. Faul is not Paul! I knew it as a child when they did the switch! 😮 How can people NOT see it isn't Paul? I don't believe Paul died either I think he wanted out. I believe he's John Halliday now in Liverpool.
@@KathleenBarrow-gh2ey You were more observant than me. I didn't realize Paul had been replaced until about 2017 when I saw videos on youtube. However, even then it took me a few years of studying videos and photos to be sure of this and learn to recognize the differences between the two men. Many people, me included, believe that the original Paul has died. Sage of Quay says he believes this because no one has seen the original Paul after the replacement. Paul is not John Halliday. I have looked at videos of John Halliday. John Halliday does not look much like Paul, other than his ears stick out as did Paul's. Halliday seems to have blue eyes, and I see no resemblance at all. He is also supposed to be younger than Paul. There are photos of Halliday when he was young, and he does not look like Paul.
@@katoness I’m not sitting on no fence I’m just not claiming to know something that I don’t know for sure.
12:42 - It actually makes a lot of sense - after all some questionable writer made a pretty penny with it!
"I Am Three Authors"
You are in the know 😉
Why do you sound like Scott?
This is nutty.
wow
Don't waste your $$ on that memoirs nonsense it's admitted fiction.
Mate, please realise that Paul McCartney is alive. I feel sorry for the conspiracy rabbit hole mob
I’m not convinced either way. At the very least he has a double.
@@PtpopThey ALL had doubles.
@@Ptpop I'm sure John wished he had a double when he was shot 😱
@DARKSHENANIGANS69 Do you believe that you’re qualified? I don’t.
😏How do you argue with science mate?
Feelings are for wankers.
If you listen to recordings of Donald Trump's speeches in reverse, they make more sense.
WTF? This has nothing to do with Donald Trump. Get used to it, he will be the next President one this corrupt bunch are gone.!