No one is drawing parallels between Science and Religion. But rather debunking the claim that Vedic civilization was backward and they had nothing other than Discrimination and Pakhand. Just like Greek and Egyptian civilization, India is the oldest one. Even Sanskrit scholar Nityanand ji also says, that we won't find the scientific studies in Vedas.
Both are science one is philosophical science means science related to our life and mind other is physical science which deals with our outer body and enviornment
Bhai nhi simple baat hai science kisi ke aami ka jana hua nhi hai.. Agr Hume lagega to match karta hai humare understanding se to hum jodenge kisi ko manna hai to mane nhi to na mane simple.... Kisike pichwade khujli ho rha wo jane.. Science unke hisse me bhi hai jode na.. Hum thodi rok rahe. Isliye aapne baap ka maal kahe kar na be he science ko..
The knowledges of Hinduism is more derivative than construct. According to the Vedas, the ultimate source of both truth (satya) and untruth (asatya) is Brahman or God, the infinite and eternal reality. This implies that all knowledge originates from the divine, making it "derivative" because it stems from this eternal source, rather than being independently "constructed" by human intellect or creativity. In this sense, Hinduism views knowledge not as a human invention but as a discovery or realization of pre-existing divine truths. The role of sages, scriptures, and practices is to reveal and interpret this eternal knowledge for human understanding. This aligns with the Vedic perspective of ṛta (cosmic order) and śruti (revealed knowledge).
Yeah, sure. Saying earth is flat and surrounded by seven seas of ghee, milk, water, curd is scientific . Mountains flying is scientifically accurate . I just say one flying. 😂 The desperate attempts some pro Hindus are trying to make mythologies scientific is hilarious and pa_£etic. The "knowledge" become scientific when they want and not when they don't. Lol. The thing is you guys don't understand what science is. Science is not religion that scares you to believe it and terrorises you, if don't BELIEVE in it by lying that some God will punish you. Instead it works hard to prove it's claim. Religion has yet to prove anything it claims. Learn to differentiate between facts and fiction. You are literate. Apply your knowledge.
@@Vor567tezvarah avatar tak me delha ja sakta hai ki Dharti golakar hai flat nahi🤦(jo jo "aapne" bola hai chapti dharti, ghee, milk, etc un sabka source+exact shlok ya verse jarur dena intellectual sir/madam🤓) Ek granth padha nahi aur gyan dene aa jate hain lmao
This is what happens when you only are scientific in name not in mind set. 1) Varaha avatar has either shown holding flat earth or has Bhu Devi in his lapse. To represent earth. The one that shows spherical only made in recent years when it become common knowledge that earth isn't flat. Do some search on Varaha statue and painting from various centuries to see it yourself. 2) Okay, so they knew earth is round but believed in a boar head man rescues it from the sea and carry it on his tusk. That's perfectly scientific to you. 🤣 See? How you are already 🧠 washed to believe mythologies as unrefuted truth that you don't even realise you are contradicting yourself. Go ahead and bring me evidence that indeed Varaha Avatar is holding the earth.
Well you're wrong saying that they all saying unscientific claims, because hypothesis is a part of prediction which comes under science. And Even the article you've shown doesn't directly decline the existence of multiverse, I used chatgpt to confirm it , it's actually you saying all things against it , trying to be famous using thumbnails of big youtubers claiming that they're wrong and you're right 👍.
@@mdxparadox6345 prediction ke liye bhi information chahie and without information prediction is invalid aur yahan per to information hi hypothesis kar rahe hain log ki agar multipurpose hua to
Well you're wrong saying that pseudoscience is a part of science. There's a large difference between pseudoscience and hypothesis. If you want to support pseudoscience by cherry picking some random definitions, you are the one who is going against the scientific method.
Thank you young man Rajan Chopra. For going against blind religious thinking and exposing the real truth. We need such brave, science-minded young men. Even if a religious organization scares you, you will not bow your head! No matter what your own religion is, never back down from scientific truth.
Solution of Grandfather paradox **Traveling Faster than Light**: In theory, if one could travel faster than the speed of light, they would overtake light waves emitted from past events, effectively allowing them to "see" those events. This means you would be able to observe past events as projections of light that are just now reaching you, similar to how we see distant stars as they were millions of years ago. However, seeing past events is not the same as interacting with them. Observing past light does not mean you can change or influence the events that produced that light. Therefore, we cannot do anything with past.
Dont want to sound rood but if you would travel faster than light how would you be see past event. Because to see you need light. All you see is pitch black darkness in theory of yours. If you want to read I would try reading a bit more special theory of relativity. And then try to understand those arguments carefully.
@@RecordKeeper-ok7llvai, @sarthokDhore is right in this matter. You should reconsider your words as if one can speed up more than speed of light then it/he can manage the speed during moving through space and make a position fixed where the past can be seen... so he is in right thoughts.
@@YourCicerone Bhai in physics time is invariant in a local neighborhood. The notion of "Seen" depends on the photons emitted or reflected. The notion of time in layman terms is very weird in General Relativity. I cannot explain it more because it's difficult to give a conclusion using Einstein's equations here. So, I would suggest you to read it first and then form any conclusion.
Wel the thing is that many people in the modern world don't know Vedic Sanskrit (which is the language of most Vedas and Upanishads), so their translation is also not 100% believable or true.
Dost, Vedic Sanskrit ki jo scriptures hai wo koi Sindhu Lipi ke scriptures jaise nhi hai jo ajj vi log samajh nhi shakte... samajte koi log hai lekin Problem ye hai ki log manna nhi chahate ki ek hi chije duniya ki haar concept explain nhi kar shakte... ye chij kuch eisi hai jaise us samay ke Newton lovers light ki particles theories se light ki wave nature ko explain karte thhe jab ki light ki wave nature Newton ji ke rhete hi kuch haad tak prove ho chuka tha... jaruri nhi hai Ved sab kuch explain kare... Ved jo marg dikhata hai sachmai, log wo hi nhi follow karte to aur kya kaha jaay😔
@@tejasviraj1428 Check the Special Relativity Chapter bro. I don't exactly the page number. I read it like 4 years ago. The shloka is in Sanskrit followed by it's meaning.
First we have to understand that getting inspiration from any fictional work is not something for which people should blame the scientist who got that inspiration... The actual debate is to steal it and not give the credit for getting that particular Idea from the source of inspiration. Second thing, the work of Aryabhatta, Brahamagupta 1-2 , varah mihira, kanad, sushruta, Bharata and many more great ancient scientists is actually stolen by the people and why it should be thought of as a stolen thing because the credit is totally stolen by the westerns... This is the actual debate... The concept of zero is credited to Indians, but algebra, rules of geometry, arithmetic, Fibonacci series, infinite series, number system, astronomy and many other scientific researches are actually done by Indian scientists and people who are getting the credit for it were actually translated those works in to their language... Like algebra, Fibonacci, binary and decimal number systems... I'm against these twisted claims and I condemn that religion and science should look different in India... But I accept the fact that people are mad to prove this, and they give very baseless arguments by giving proof of some total fiction work... So, I'm against that mindset also... Because in the world of science itself, not all the research is scientific... A lot of them got proved wrong... But we appreciate the scientists for at least trying to put some light on that particular topic... Look at it in this way and no need to criticize religion or science in any case because I feel that you can only criticize science if you are a scientist and religion if you have enough knowledge to criticize it... 😊
Btw we shouldn't compare our religious history scientists are trying hard to solve the mystery, but we can take help from them to improve our thoughts 🤔💭
First of all knowledge is like a germinating seed . It passes through different phases . We are very new to multiverse . So we can’t come to conclusions directly. And talking about does multiverse exist . According to me it could only get into a point if we certainly know the true nature of space and time and also when we know that what do we mean when we say universe . There might be space with different cosmological constant that we don’t know or such condition that effect the cosmological constant. Or it might be possible that there is nothing like cosmological constant because we don’t know about entire cosmos . It might be also possible that our universe is only capable of utilising that much part of the energy or force
The multiverse is an interesting concept but highly speculative at best. My take is as follows: The multiverse is the concept that arises from several scientific theories, like cosmic inflation, string theory, and quantum mechanics. These theories suggest that there may be more than one universe, each with its own physical laws or constants. Yet, for now, there is no direct evidence of the multiverse, and it is unknown if it will ever be testable by science. I don't "believe" in the multiverse in the way that one would believe in things like the roundness of Earth, the Big Bang, evolution, and germ theory; I treat the multiverse as an intriguing hypothesis that pushes our understanding of what reality might be. Insofar as no empirical evidence yet exists to support it, it stays within the province of theoretical physics and philosophy.
@huklo6331 yes it can exist in movies and in books but not irl, BRO TRY TO UNDERSTAND IT IS HYPOTHESIS. many people in the world like you believe in multiverse, do you know why because of movies and science fiction stories
@ExcitedGlassRose-hi1xwbro first try to under stand out body. Made up of 3 thing. Our biological body Our soul we also call it energy which transfer to another being after we death. Adn third Was our soul personality. Means sukshma sarir. It connected to all over the universe where our same variant are available. Or when we see dream at night we see thier visual of that universe in our universe.
How do u know, u r not expanding, if every single thing in universe is expanding at constant rate, even the sub atomic particles and space between them???
Dekho bhai tum bhi theory theory khel rahe ,wo theory theory khel rahe tum koi result nikaale to nahi ,tum apni soch waale scientist ka sunte ho wo apni soch ke milte scientist ki sunte ,sacchai phir bhi nahi pata chalegi tumhaare marte dum Tak..
Kya matlab theory theory khel rahe ? Tumko lagta hai ki saari theories ka weight Same hai? Scientific community kabhi aise theories ko accept nahi karti...
@@factsjano7178 jin theories aur hypothesis ki tum baat kar rahe ho Jo science me commonly accepted hain vo atleast mathematically true aur evident bhi hoti hain , Naaki koi bhi dharmic man gadhan kahaniya jinko tum " theory " kaa naam deke jyada scientific dikhana chah rahe ho joki vo bilkul nahi hain....
@@ashvathama-zi9vf haluma pe ma viswash nahi karta. Mere akho ke samne dikho jo tuk bol re ho anhi dikha sakta toh ma uspa nahi viswas karuga tum atheist bhi toh kuch bhagwan ko proof yehsa he mangta ho na 🤣🤣
@@factsjano7178Bilkul, hum atheists bhi proof maangte hain aur wahi maante hain jo evidence aur logic se prove ho. Haluma ek mazaak hai, aur bina evidence ke koi uspar vishwas nahi karega. Agar bhagwan ka bhi koi proof nahi hai, toh dono mein farq kya hai? Tum haluma ko nahi maante, toh bhagwan ko kyun maante ho bina evidence ke?
They don't claim that they tell us is true but rather their fault is that they just present it like that so people believe it's true which is problem they just make content on Hinduism just to feed the ego of so called sanatani who never even read the first shlok of bhagavadgeeta
sir if the space is expending so this means it is taking some more space , but out of what? my simple question is that if space is expanding then this means some space is adding in the previous one just like 2+2=4 here 2 is being expended to become 4 by adding another 2. so how the space is being created? I am glad if you answer my question?
space isn't expanding into anything The expansion of the universe means that the fabric of space itself is stretching causing distances between objects like galaxies to increaseSpace doesn't need to be created from something; it's just stretching and growing over timeThere's no outside that space is expanding into
@@sajadhussyn then what limit it can be stretched. if infinite so this means space is infinite and according to my research this is still a debatable subject that space is finite or infinite. Please do not make any kind of pseudoscientific claims until you have a scientific justification. And also there are very few things in this universe which is made out of nothing.
Your speaking technique is very very appreciate and All the topics that he told were all amazing. I came to know about the topic from him for the first time.❤
You can't imagine just anything every single thing you imagine comes from your experienceces, your interaction with other and your knowledge nothing comes out of a bloom and thats why even if all our ancestors claims were just imagination it proves that we were the most advanced civilization ever existed.
@@NikhilSoni-w7g Sagan simply has reworded the principle, which was actually put forward by Laplace, the mathematician. "The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness" - Laplace And that exact quote which your are talking about is nowhere!!
Can you tell me please that what’s that paper say that is contradicting the anthropic principle exactly in short? Like I didn’t get that part. Thank you.
At last bro you didn't conclude anything as this paper is usual case of research which is just another theoratical things for both things this paper and parallel univers you have no experimental proofs 😅 then what to get from this at last
Bhai itni bakchodi kar liya tune science samjhaane ke iye but tu kuchh bhee sahi se explain nahin kar paaya...but hindu dharm par tu bol raha hain.tab tu pahle carl sagan ko samjha vo kya bole the Hinduism par...ek toh tu science half jaanta hain upper se tu beech mein kud raha hain .teri koi khud kee research ho toh bata..warna ye faltu kaa video mat bana ..😂😂😂
Tum jaiso ko science to bahot hi dur ki baat hain but dharma ke bareme bhi nahi pata sirf apni kahaniya banate rahte ho. Jaruri nahi ki tumhaari andh budhi jo padh rahi hain vohi sahi ho aur jo tum padh rahe ho uska real meaning achhe se samaj rahe ho. Tum jaise andhbhakto aur room temperature iq waale ke hi vajah se bharat 1200 saal tak gulaam raha hain kyonki tumhe jo bhi kaha jaata hain vo blindly maan ne lagte ho bina jaane tum jaiso ko liye Osho ne aek baat ki hain ‘’mano mat jaano’’
In short, space isn't expanding into anything. The expansion of the universe means that the fabric of space itself is stretching, causing distances between objects (like galaxies) to increase. Space doesn't need to be "created" from something; it's just stretching and growing over time. There's no "outside" that space is expanding into.
Space itself is expanding, as evidenced by the observation that galaxies are moving away from each other, with more distant galaxies receding faster. This phenomenon, described by the Big Bang theory and Hubble's Law, refers to the stretching of the fabric of space-time, not galaxies traveling through space but being carried apart with space as it expands. IT'S VERY SIMPLE
That doesn't makes sense, space is expandinginto itself? How is it possible.. let's say a balloon with2 dots in it is being expanded for a 2d being it will look like both the points are going apart and is expanding onto itself but for a 3d being as us we know the baboon is expanding into space....same may go for space maybe it is expanding into some multiverse or some 4d fabric..,or maybe answer doesn't exists and will not exist for infinity
Grow up kid your this kind of knowledge is not even wortht to be known by even yourself.... Give your life some time to develop your research scientifically and cross these bridges of chaos silently....in hope of fame you are ruining your passion of science
S;cience is n;ot in da;nger. Y;our ca;reer is in d;anger. Dha;rma a;nd Sci;ence c;an go h;and in h;and as conf;irmed by Vive;kanand. We d;on't n;eed tox;ic a;theism in Ind;ia.
Sir I have a question if light is being emitted from a star and Photons in that light don't experience time so why we say that the light we received is quite old even though for Photons time didn't even passed for a single nanosecond
5 Mistakes: Misinterpretation of Time for Photons: The question assumes that photons "experiencing no time" means they exist independently of the passage of time for observers in other frames. In reality, time dilation for photons applies only to their own perspective, not the perspective of external observers. Confusion Between Photon and Observer's Time: The question conflates the lack of proper time for photons (due to traveling at light speed) with the time experienced by an observer on Earth. Light travels at finite speed, so it still takes measurable time to reach us. Ignoring the Speed of Light as Finite: Even though photons experience no time in their own frame, the light still travels across a measurable distance (e.g., light-years), which determines how long it takes to reach Earth in our frame of reference. Assuming Photon "Awareness" of Time: Photons are not sentient; they do not "experience" time. Time dilation for photons is a mathematical result of their travel at light speed, not a conscious phenomenon. Neglecting Relativity's Frame Dependence: The question disregards that time is relative and depends on the observer's frame. For us on Earth, the finite speed of light means we observe light from stars as being old, regardless of the photon's perspective. 3 Misconceptions: Photon's Timelessness Affects Observation: Misconception: Because photons don't experience time, their journey seems instantaneous to us. Reality: Photons' lack of proper time doesn't impact the fact that their travel to us takes finite time due to their speed (300,000 km/s). Time Passage Is the Same for All Observers: Misconception: If photons experience no time, we should also see them as "timeless." Reality: Time for the photon’s perspective (proper time) is separate from the time experienced by us as observers. Age of Light vs. Journey of Photons: Misconception: The "age" of the light depends on the photon’s time experience. Reality: The "age" of light refers to the time it takes for light to travel to us in our frame of reference, not the photon's frame.
@@luffy_106 Ask me anything, I hold a Master's degree in Physics and am currently pursuing a PhD in Quantum Physics. I also study the Vedas and Upanishads and noticed many conceptual similarities between modern science and these ancient scriptures, there are some questions that even science cannot answer, but I find insights into them within our scriptures.
Toh bhai un scriptures ka sahi interpretation kya hai warna Hanuman Chalisa mein earth se Sun tak ka distance phle se nai diya hota humare grantho mein
Koi study nahi. Deep state ki padhai ki funding.anti hindu. Plus modi cult. Yakeen n ho to ..Yeh sab modi hee karwa raha hai 12 saal se bharat ko defame karne. Usko america or middle East se bribe milti hai. Badee rupya
Before sometime you said actually, some young physicists came and according to their curiosity, they write anything in article and then published it So that's mean its all fault of those physicist,right Am I right
@Abhinav-_000_ kyu tb khud pe bharosa nhi hai ya karna nhi chahte ho 🤔 hn ha pta hai cool banane ke liye Quantum physics mein Msc kar rha hu bol diye abhi abhi ek aur ne likha tha 😂😂
Why am I seeing a certain rise in the number of so called "Science" related channels, Amassing together and attacking a select few Channels dedicated to Santana ? Are you guys getting funding from somewhere?🤔 Seems like it ... Because none of the Sanatan channel have any disagreement or malice against any scince channel...
Aapne kha ke string theory ke support me bhot log khde hai to iska mtlb ye nhi ke wo shi ho kyoki string theory ke paas experimental support nhi hai uske paas.........iska to ye mtlb bhi nhi ke koi chiz apne aap ko sabit nhi kr paa rhi to wo hai he nhi
If you read 108 upanishads 4 vedhas. Then you will never talk this irrelevant trash i prefer you to that. Once you had done with reading vedhas and Upanishads then your 25 year of studying quantum mechanics will be proved as lie and you may not able to bear to so be careful 😂.
Flat earth is said by your scholars from years till now...... Our many claims are correct like the value of the pie, the shape of earth, the position of sun and star
I think universe was not created in a way that big bang theory explains, completely it's like a similar process of reproduction, growth and extension. Universe or infinity could be like a point size element earlier atom that it is growing and extending.
vese to mai believe karta hu isme kyoki jis se pehle universe tha us se pehle kya tha aisa to hoga nahi ki first try me life ko janam de diya sari condition perfectly meet karke baki mujhe bhi itna malumnahi ye argument to mere logic ko temporarily satisfy karne ke liye mai deta hu kyoki is se kuchh better milta hi to vo mai us karne lag jaaunga
Feedback: Video wasn't bad but I didn't get any new information which can satisfy my curiosity & due to your clickbait(title & thumbnail)I feel I wasted my time Good luck for future though 😌
Bhai pata nahi inhe vedon puranon se kya diklat hai, burnol bhijwana chahiye.😂😂😂(aur science ke 14 bachhe inke video dekhte hain jinse puchho to quantum ka matlab nahi bata payenge par ye sab dekh kar khud ko intellectual samajhte hain.)
Thanks bhai ye video banane ke liye. Mujhe bhi bahut time se lag rha tha ki ye log religion claims ko sach proove karne liye kaise bhi ghuma ke science ko jod denge us se .
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
No one is drawing parallels between Science and Religion. But rather debunking the claim that Vedic civilization was backward and they had nothing other than Discrimination and Pakhand. Just like Greek and Egyptian civilization, India is the oldest one. Even Sanskrit scholar Nityanand ji also says, that we won't find the scientific studies in Vedas.
Both are science one is philosophical science means science related to our life and mind other is physical science which deals with our outer body and enviornment
@SoumyashisDeb true, well said
Vedic Civilization is bakward??? Well man, I do not think if a civilization respects good character then it is bakward.
@sky333suraj true
Bhai nhi simple baat hai science kisi ke aami ka jana hua nhi hai..
Agr Hume lagega to match karta hai humare understanding se to hum jodenge kisi ko manna hai to mane nhi to na mane simple....
Kisike pichwade khujli ho rha wo jane..
Science unke hisse me bhi hai jode na..
Hum thodi rok rahe.
Isliye aapne baap ka maal kahe kar na be he science ko..
Being honest it seems more meaningful that multiverse exists
The knowledges of Hinduism is more derivative than construct. According to the Vedas, the ultimate source of both truth (satya) and untruth (asatya) is Brahman or God, the infinite and eternal reality. This implies that all knowledge originates from the divine, making it "derivative" because it stems from this eternal source, rather than being independently "constructed" by human intellect or creativity.
In this sense, Hinduism views knowledge not as a human invention but as a discovery or realization of pre-existing divine truths. The role of sages, scriptures, and practices is to reveal and interpret this eternal knowledge for human understanding. This aligns with the Vedic perspective of ṛta (cosmic order) and śruti (revealed knowledge).
Then if Hinduism was so advanced in science , didn't they survived invasion ??
As because aur Rishi Muni don't like to fight with the illiterate ...invaders.
Yeah, sure. Saying earth is flat and surrounded by seven seas of ghee, milk, water, curd is scientific .
Mountains flying is scientifically accurate . I just say one flying. 😂
The desperate attempts some pro Hindus are trying to make mythologies scientific is hilarious and pa_£etic. The "knowledge" become scientific when they want and not when they don't. Lol.
The thing is you guys don't understand what science is. Science is not religion that scares you to believe it and terrorises you, if don't BELIEVE in it by lying that some God will punish you.
Instead it works hard to prove it's claim. Religion has yet to prove anything it claims.
Learn to differentiate between facts and fiction. You are literate. Apply your knowledge.
@@Vor567tezvarah avatar tak me delha ja sakta hai ki Dharti golakar hai flat nahi🤦(jo jo "aapne" bola hai chapti dharti, ghee, milk, etc un sabka source+exact shlok ya verse jarur dena intellectual sir/madam🤓)
Ek granth padha nahi aur gyan dene aa jate hain lmao
This is what happens when you only are scientific in name not in mind set.
1) Varaha avatar has either shown holding flat earth or has Bhu Devi in his lapse. To represent earth.
The one that shows spherical only made in recent years when it become common knowledge that earth isn't flat. Do some search on Varaha statue and painting from various centuries to see it yourself.
2) Okay, so they knew earth is round but believed in a boar head man rescues it from the sea and carry it on his tusk. That's perfectly scientific to you. 🤣
See? How you are already 🧠 washed to believe mythologies as unrefuted truth that you don't even realise you are contradicting yourself.
Go ahead and bring me evidence that indeed Varaha Avatar is holding the earth.
Well you're wrong saying that they all saying unscientific claims, because hypothesis is a part of prediction which comes under science. And Even the article you've shown doesn't directly decline the existence of multiverse, I used chatgpt to confirm it , it's actually you saying all things against it , trying to be famous using thumbnails of big youtubers claiming that they're wrong and you're right 👍.
chat gpt 😭😭😭😭😭really ?
Yeah it true he just wants to get some views let him take it 😅
@@mdxparadox6345 prediction ke liye bhi information chahie and without information prediction is invalid aur yahan per to information hi hypothesis kar rahe hain log ki agar multipurpose hua to
@@electrondynamics9721 Y;es ch;at gpt is clea;rly ha;ving m;ore inte;llect th;an y;ou.
Well you're wrong saying that pseudoscience is a part of science. There's a large difference between pseudoscience and hypothesis. If you want to support pseudoscience by cherry picking some random definitions, you are the one who is going against the scientific method.
Thank you young man Rajan Chopra. For going against blind religious thinking and exposing the real truth. We need such brave, science-minded young men. Even if a religious organization scares you, you will not bow your head! No matter what your own religion is, never back down from scientific truth.
Solution of Grandfather paradox
**Traveling Faster than Light**: In theory, if one could travel faster than the speed of light, they would overtake light waves emitted from past events, effectively allowing them to "see" those events. This means you would be able to observe past events as projections of light that are just now reaching you, similar to how we see distant stars as they were millions of years ago.
However, seeing past events is not the same as interacting with them. Observing past light does not mean you can change or influence the events that produced that light. Therefore, we cannot do anything with past.
It's my own theory. please tell me what's wrong in this
Dont want to sound rood but if you would travel faster than light how would you be see past event. Because to see you need light. All you see is pitch black darkness in theory of yours.
If you want to read I would try reading a bit more special theory of relativity. And then try to understand those arguments carefully.
@@RecordKeeper-ok7llvai, @sarthokDhore is right in this matter. You should reconsider your words as if one can speed up more than speed of light then it/he can manage the speed during moving through space and make a position fixed where the past can be seen... so he is in right thoughts.
Sending and recieving data faster than speed of light is possible. Travelling I don't know. It could be possible. @@YourCicerone
@@YourCicerone Bhai in physics time is invariant in a local neighborhood. The notion of "Seen" depends on the photons emitted or reflected. The notion of time in layman terms is very weird in General Relativity. I cannot explain it more because it's difficult to give a conclusion using Einstein's equations here. So, I would suggest you to read it first and then form any conclusion.
Wel the thing is that many people in the modern world don't know Vedic Sanskrit (which is the language of most Vedas and Upanishads), so their translation is also not 100% believable or true.
Dost, Vedic Sanskrit ki jo scriptures hai wo koi Sindhu Lipi ke scriptures jaise nhi hai jo ajj vi log samajh nhi shakte... samajte koi log hai lekin Problem ye hai ki log manna nhi chahate ki ek hi chije duniya ki haar concept explain nhi kar shakte... ye chij kuch eisi hai jaise us samay ke Newton lovers light ki particles theories se light ki wave nature ko explain karte thhe jab ki light ki wave nature Newton ji ke rhete hi kuch haad tak prove ho chuka tha... jaruri nhi hai Ved sab kuch explain kare... Ved jo marg dikhata hai sachmai, log wo hi nhi follow karte to aur kya kaha jaay😔
@shyamrajwat-x3rVedic Sanskrit applies for one or two word??
HC Verma concepts of physics itself contains the shloka from Vedas where speed of light value is given.
Jake dekhlo hv verma ne khud clarification diya hua hai usko leke bad me bakchodi karna yaha gobar
Speed of light ka formula kaha hai diya hai
@@adarshdahat4597bhai experiment
Page number bata bhai mere pass bhi hai hc verma ??
@@tejasviraj1428 Check the Special Relativity Chapter bro.
I don't exactly the page number. I read it like 4 years ago. The shloka is in Sanskrit followed by it's meaning.
How happy is this guy explaining the research paper. God bless you, brother, you would do something big in your life.
♥️
@@Rajan15x Nice Try Man
First we have to understand that getting inspiration from any fictional work is not something for which people should blame the scientist who got that inspiration... The actual debate is to steal it and not give the credit for getting that particular Idea from the source of inspiration.
Second thing, the work of Aryabhatta, Brahamagupta 1-2 , varah mihira, kanad, sushruta, Bharata and many more great ancient scientists is actually stolen by the people and why it should be thought of as a stolen thing because the credit is totally stolen by the westerns... This is the actual debate...
The concept of zero is credited to Indians, but algebra, rules of geometry, arithmetic, Fibonacci series, infinite series, number system, astronomy and many other scientific researches are actually done by Indian scientists and people who are getting the credit for it were actually translated those works in to their language... Like algebra, Fibonacci, binary and decimal number systems... I'm against these twisted claims and I condemn that religion and science should look different in India...
But I accept the fact that people are mad to prove this, and they give very baseless arguments by giving proof of some total fiction work... So, I'm against that mindset also...
Because in the world of science itself, not all the research is scientific... A lot of them got proved wrong... But we appreciate the scientists for at least trying to put some light on that particular topic... Look at it in this way and no need to criticize religion or science in any case because I feel that you can only criticize science if you are a scientist and religion if you have enough knowledge to criticize it... 😊
Btw we shouldn't compare our religious history scientists are trying hard to solve the mystery, but we can take help from them to improve our thoughts 🤔💭
idk why people believe michio kaku as theoritical phyisicist he is just an author.....
better learn higher physics from physicists like roger penrose....
@@NikhilSoni-w7g I say, better learn advanced maths rather than pop science
He is same as neil degrasse tyson.
First of all knowledge is like a germinating seed . It passes through different phases . We are very new to multiverse . So we can’t come to conclusions directly.
And talking about does multiverse exist . According to me it could only get into a point if we certainly know the true nature of space and time and also when we know that what do we mean when we say universe . There might be space with different cosmological constant that we don’t know or such condition that effect the cosmological constant. Or it might be possible that there is nothing like cosmological constant because we don’t know about entire cosmos . It might be also possible that our universe is only capable of utilising that much part of the energy or force
The multiverse is an interesting concept but highly speculative at best. My take is as follows:
The multiverse is the concept that arises from several scientific theories, like cosmic inflation, string theory, and quantum mechanics. These theories suggest that there may be more than one universe, each with its own physical laws or constants. Yet, for now, there is no direct evidence of the multiverse, and it is unknown if it will ever be testable by science. I don't "believe" in the multiverse in the way that one would believe in things like the roundness of Earth, the Big Bang, evolution, and germ theory; I treat the multiverse as an intriguing hypothesis that pushes our understanding of what reality might be. Insofar as no empirical evidence yet exists to support it, it stays within the province of theoretical physics and philosophy.
Its very possible
@huklo6331 yes it can exist in movies and in books but not irl,
BRO TRY TO UNDERSTAND IT IS HYPOTHESIS.
many people in the world like you believe in multiverse, do you know why because of movies and science fiction stories
@ExcitedGlassRose-hi1xwbro first try to under stand out body.
Made up of 3 thing.
Our biological body
Our soul we also call it energy which transfer to another being after we death.
Adn third
Was our soul personality.
Means sukshma sarir.
It connected to all over the universe where our same variant are available.
Or when we see dream at night we see thier visual of that universe in our universe.
Good job bro, nice initiative, keep going
How do u know, u r not expanding, if every single thing in universe is expanding at constant rate, even the sub atomic particles and space between them???
bro if we will expand than other thing will also expand but measure to those thing is not increasing
Yes of course I believe in Multivese. But can't ignore the scientific discovery.
Dekho bhai tum bhi theory theory khel rahe ,wo theory theory khel rahe tum koi result nikaale to nahi ,tum apni soch waale scientist ka sunte ho wo apni soch ke milte scientist ki sunte ,sacchai phir bhi nahi pata chalegi tumhaare marte dum Tak..
Kya matlab theory theory khel rahe ? Tumko lagta hai ki saari theories ka weight Same hai? Scientific community kabhi aise theories ko accept nahi karti...
@@ashvathama-zi9vftoh hum tumahra theory pe kiyu bharosa karega tum bhi theory deta ho proof tohdi 😂
@@factsjano7178 jin theories aur hypothesis ki tum baat kar rahe ho Jo science me commonly accepted hain vo atleast mathematically true aur evident bhi hoti hain , Naaki koi bhi dharmic man gadhan kahaniya jinko tum " theory " kaa naam deke jyada scientific dikhana chah rahe ho joki vo bilkul nahi hain....
@@ashvathama-zi9vf haluma pe ma viswash nahi karta. Mere akho ke samne dikho jo tuk bol re ho anhi dikha sakta toh ma uspa nahi viswas karuga tum atheist bhi toh kuch bhagwan ko proof yehsa he mangta ho na 🤣🤣
@@factsjano7178Bilkul, hum atheists bhi proof maangte hain aur wahi maante hain jo evidence aur logic se prove ho. Haluma ek mazaak hai, aur bina evidence ke koi uspar vishwas nahi karega. Agar bhagwan ka bhi koi proof nahi hai, toh dono mein farq kya hai? Tum haluma ko nahi maante, toh bhagwan ko kyun maante ho bina evidence ke?
They don't claim that they tell us is true but rather their fault is that they just present it like that so people believe it's true which is problem they just make content on Hinduism just to feed the ego of so called sanatani who never even read the first shlok of bhagavadgeeta
Bro neither learn from science nor learn from Hinduism just trying to be controversial to become famous
Yeah he is pseudo scientific and pseudo religious he neither knows religion nor science he is in middle and which ever thrives he takes its place 😂
Who ?
sir if the space is expending so this means it is taking some more space , but out of what? my simple question is that if space is expanding then this means some space is adding in the previous one just like 2+2=4 here 2 is being expended to become 4 by adding another 2. so how the space is being created?
I am glad if you answer my question?
Wow kya logic h but bro space how add himself 🤔🤔
@studymany no bro i am just curious so i asked if you have justification then you can answer.
space isn't expanding into anything The expansion of the universe means that the fabric of space itself is stretching causing distances between objects like galaxies to increaseSpace doesn't need to be created from something; it's just stretching and growing over timeThere's no outside that space is expanding into
@@sajadhussyn then what limit it can be stretched. if infinite so this means space is infinite and according to my research this is still a debatable subject that space is finite or infinite. Please do not make any kind of pseudoscientific claims until you have a scientific justification. And also there are very few things in this universe which is made out of nothing.
@@ParthRajawat-wp6dy ok but mere pass iska koi satik answer nhi h so sorry
Your speaking technique is very very appreciate and All the topics that he told were all amazing. I came to know about the topic from him for the first time.❤
You can't imagine just anything every single thing you imagine comes from your experienceces, your interaction with other and your knowledge nothing comes out of a bloom and thats why even if all our ancestors claims were just imagination it proves that we were the most advanced civilization ever existed.
That we see as a constant. Our universe might be acting like a boundary or the structure of the force itself
Keep ho bhaiya!! 5 years old subscriber.. ❤❤
Nice video. As Carl Sagan rightly said “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. Science indeed thrives on evidences 🚀
Appreciate the feedback. Let's keep the scientific spirit alive!
Actually Sagan never told this statement 😅, it's just random quote there is no authentic source that Sagan told this.
@@Arav.kapoor4 you can find his quote in his book
@@Arav.kapoor4its an extraordinary claim so give extraordinary evidence why he did not claimed ??
@@NikhilSoni-w7g Sagan simply has reworded the principle, which was actually put forward by Laplace, the mathematician.
"The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness" - Laplace
And that exact quote which your are talking about is nowhere!!
Can you tell me please that what’s that paper say that is contradicting the anthropic principle exactly in short? Like I didn’t get that part. Thank you.
Paper ke bare main toh bataya hi nhi
You earned a subscriber bro .. 🙂 Thanks for exposing them ...
Good job❤❤❤
These guy most be more talent then Einstein and all those big modern scientists.
Bro please explain this research paper in detail and give the detail summary of this research paper
DO YOU WANT RESEARCH PAPER ?? I CAN SEND YOU
@ExcitedGlassRose-hi1xw I have this research paper but it's quite difficult to understand and it's creates many doubts.
At last bro you didn't conclude anything as this paper is usual case of research which is just another theoratical things for both things this paper and parallel univers you have no experimental proofs 😅 then what to get from this at last
Bhai itni bakchodi kar liya tune science samjhaane ke iye but tu kuchh bhee sahi se explain nahin kar paaya...but hindu dharm par tu bol raha hain.tab tu pahle carl sagan ko samjha vo kya bole the Hinduism par...ek toh tu science half jaanta hain upper se tu beech mein kud raha hain .teri koi khud kee research ho toh bata..warna ye faltu kaa video mat bana ..😂😂😂
Bhai ye famous hone ke liye kr rha hai na isko science kuch pta hai na hi dharm ka 😂😂
Tum jaiso ko science to bahot hi dur ki baat hain but dharma ke bareme bhi nahi pata sirf apni kahaniya banate rahte ho. Jaruri nahi ki tumhaari andh budhi jo padh rahi hain vohi sahi ho aur jo tum padh rahe ho uska real meaning achhe se samaj rahe ho. Tum jaise andhbhakto aur room temperature iq waale ke hi vajah se bharat 1200 saal tak gulaam raha hain kyonki tumhe jo bhi kaha jaata hain vo blindly maan ne lagte ho bina jaane tum jaiso ko liye Osho ne aek baat ki hain ‘’mano mat jaano’’
Kyu tujhe samjh nahi kya?, jo usne bola?
Saheel Adeem & Abdul salam Arif of pakistan always talk about this since past few years
भाई कोई बिदेशी गोरा जो बोलें उसे बीना सोचें समझे मान लेना चाहिए,,
क्या इंडियन में यह करने की शक्ति नही है??
sirf indians hai isliye bewakoof banoge?
अगर मूर्ख बुद्धिमान की बात समझ जाता तो वो मूर्ख क्यों कहलाता 😎
Gaurav brought my interest more in science 😊
ओई बता डिस्कवरी साइंस देखा हैक्या
Bohot badhiya bhai 🎉
Hello Rajan, I am a computer science student, I have developed an interest in physics. Hats off to your teaching skills.
Same
Same
Make a video about Druvh rathe too
Mtlb rishi kanaad ke vaisheshika sutra me jo likha hai wo faltu likha hai
I personally do not believe in parallel universe but still support the possibility of multiple verse.
In short, space isn't expanding into anything. The expansion of the universe means that the fabric of space itself is stretching, causing distances between objects (like galaxies) to increase. Space doesn't need to be "created" from something; it's just stretching and growing over time. There's no "outside" that space is expanding into.
No, the space is actually expanding. If u want a ref, ask me
Space itself is expanding, as evidenced by the observation that galaxies are moving away from each other, with more distant galaxies receding faster. This phenomenon, described by the Big Bang theory and Hubble's Law, refers to the stretching of the fabric of space-time, not galaxies traveling through space but being carried apart with space as it expands. IT'S VERY SIMPLE
That doesn't makes sense, space is expandinginto itself? How is it possible.. let's say a balloon with2 dots in it is being expanded for a 2d being it will look like both the points are going apart and is expanding onto itself but for a 3d being as us we know the baboon is expanding into space....same may go for space maybe it is expanding into some multiverse or some 4d fabric..,or maybe answer doesn't exists and will not exist for infinity
hello brother apka qualification kya hai ???????
Bro was cooked 😅
Pta hi nahi chala, video kab khatam go gyi !☠💀
Bro you can do good in long form content just start debunking pseudoscience and explanation on popular theory hypothesis
Grow up kid your this kind of knowledge is not even wortht to be known by even yourself.... Give your life some time to develop your research scientifically and cross these bridges of chaos silently....in hope of fame you are ruining your passion of science
Ranveer aur hyperqest ka timestamp please .. ya kir part 2 ayeaga
किसको नोबल मिला हैं paralel universe साबित करने के लिए
S;cience is n;ot in da;nger. Y;our ca;reer is in d;anger.
Dha;rma a;nd Sci;ence c;an go h;and in h;and as conf;irmed by Vive;kanand.
We d;on't n;eed tox;ic a;theism in Ind;ia.
We don't need anntbhakat in India
@@beenagautam8518
Who "w;e"?
You are al;one w;ith a sm;all gr;oup.
Y;ou do n;eed an;dhbhakt f;or adver;tisement of fo;reign c;ult at;heism.
@@beenagautam8518
Vive;kananda w;as an;dhbhakt?
@@dustudent1637 no you are
@@beenagautam8518
T;hen y;our f;irst com;ment is con;tradicted.
Sir I have a question if light is being emitted from a star and Photons in that light don't experience time so why we say that the light we received is quite old even though for Photons time didn't even passed for a single nanosecond
Bhai thoda aur easy tarike se samjao. Sab upar se chala gaya. I m commerce student 😅
5 Mistakes:
Misinterpretation of Time for Photons:
The question assumes that photons "experiencing no time" means they exist independently of the passage of time for observers in other frames. In reality, time dilation for photons applies only to their own perspective, not the perspective of external observers.
Confusion Between Photon and Observer's Time:
The question conflates the lack of proper time for photons (due to traveling at light speed) with the time experienced by an observer on Earth. Light travels at finite speed, so it still takes measurable time to reach us.
Ignoring the Speed of Light as Finite:
Even though photons experience no time in their own frame, the light still travels across a measurable distance (e.g., light-years), which determines how long it takes to reach Earth in our frame of reference.
Assuming Photon "Awareness" of Time:
Photons are not sentient; they do not "experience" time. Time dilation for photons is a mathematical result of their travel at light speed, not a conscious phenomenon.
Neglecting Relativity's Frame Dependence:
The question disregards that time is relative and depends on the observer's frame. For us on Earth, the finite speed of light means we observe light from stars as being old, regardless of the photon's perspective.
3 Misconceptions:
Photon's Timelessness Affects Observation:
Misconception: Because photons don't experience time, their journey seems instantaneous to us.
Reality: Photons' lack of proper time doesn't impact the fact that their travel to us takes finite time due to their speed (300,000 km/s).
Time Passage Is the Same for All Observers:
Misconception: If photons experience no time, we should also see them as "timeless."
Reality: Time for the photon’s perspective (proper time) is separate from the time experienced by us as observers.
Age of Light vs. Journey of Photons:
Misconception: The "age" of the light depends on the photon’s time experience.
Reality: The "age" of light refers to the time it takes for light to travel to us in our frame of reference, not the photon's frame.
Ha bhai samajh gye tm intellectuals k 14de ho😎👍
Well tumse to bhot jada hi janta hai vo
Aa gaye muh se paida hue log😂
Tum logo se kya hi ummeed kar ab
Kyu tu hi bta de gyan chand 😂😂 tere granthon mein kha likha hai la mere pass wo
Aur tu kis ka 14 hai 😂😂
@@luffy_106 Ask me anything,
I hold a Master's degree in Physics and am currently pursuing a PhD in Quantum Physics.
I also study the Vedas and Upanishads and noticed many conceptual similarities between modern science and these ancient scriptures,
there are some questions that even science cannot answer, but I find insights into them within our scriptures.
1:26 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
Roger Penrose is a scientist at the forefront of new and original thinking My favourite physicist of all time
They are so obsessed with their religion that they can spread pseudo science 🔭
Sir may be you have to collab with VIGYAAN RECHARGE he is also interested like you. SIR PLEASE.I will be happy if you do this 😀😀😍😍😀😀
Photon's image is out . Video when?
Ha ye to satya h bhai ki Newton aur einstein lifted their work directly from Vedas. And i can prove.
I like your videos love from Nepal
Toh bhai un scriptures ka sahi interpretation kya hai warna Hanuman Chalisa mein earth se Sun tak ka distance phle se nai diya hota humare grantho mein
Earth aur sun ki distance kabhi constant nahi rehti uncle
@@Dadadadadadada440lakin jis particular time ma hanuman ji na earth se sun travel kiya tha tab toh woh particular time constant thi na 😂
Bhaiya aap kon si field me study kr rahe ho
Koi study nahi. Deep state ki padhai ki funding.anti hindu. Plus modi cult. Yakeen n ho to ..Yeh sab modi hee karwa raha hai 12 saal se bharat ko defame karne. Usko america or middle East se bribe milti hai. Badee rupya
Bro make me nihilistic person😂😂
Read Camus 🗣️
Before sometime you said actually, some young physicists came and according to their curiosity, they write anything in article and then published it
So that's mean its all fault of those physicist,right
Am I right
No u r lying you r showing edited clip of HC verma i watched it full
I pity your ignorance and bombastic superficiality.
Keep it up 💯👌 jai vigyan
Dhruv rathee ka beta aa gaya.
True
Beta kitne tak padhe ho 😂😂 jra aayine mein dekh kar bolo khud se 😂😂
@@Sumit_Uzumaki_nitt Msc in quantum physics, IISC.
@Abhinav-_000_ kyu tb khud pe bharosa nhi hai ya karna nhi chahte ho 🤔 hn ha pta hai cool banane ke liye Quantum physics mein Msc kar rha hu bol diye abhi abhi ek aur ne likha tha 😂😂
@@Sumit_Uzumaki_nittkoyi tumko anime dekhna se fursat nahi ha tum uska juta ke barabar nahi ho 😂 western sci padho wahi tumhara liya ha 😂
aap Kon se institute se padhe ho??
Iiit Bombay
Why am I seeing a certain rise in the number of so called "Science" related channels,
Amassing together and attacking a select few Channels dedicated to Santana ?
Are you guys getting funding from somewhere?🤔
Seems like it ...
Because none of the Sanatan channel have any disagreement or malice against any scince channel...
So according to you, its not wrong to spread pseudoscience?
@chinmay1958 what do you exactly mean by pseudoscience?
@chinmay1958 give me examples
@@VeganSanatani See those videos for the examples
@@chinmay1958 no..I am asking you
Aapne kha ke string theory ke support me bhot log khde hai to iska mtlb ye nhi ke wo shi ho kyoki string theory ke paas experimental support nhi hai uske paas.........iska to ye mtlb bhi nhi ke koi chiz apne aap ko sabit nhi kr paa rhi to wo hai he nhi
Hlo bro agar kisi ko science main interest hai to bo mara videos be dakh shakta hai.😊😊😊
If you read 108 upanishads 4 vedhas. Then you will never talk this irrelevant trash i prefer you to that. Once you had done with reading vedhas and Upanishads then your 25 year of studying quantum mechanics will be proved as lie and you may not able to bear to so be careful 😂.
EXACTLY..
Including your religion in science is totally worst
Flat earth is said by your scholars from years till now......
Our many claims are correct like the value of the pie, the shape of earth, the position of sun and star
Calculas also
At least our religion doesn't tell to bang s@x sla ves . Reference quran surah al mominoon 1 to 6 ayats
From where we can download this research papers?
DO YOU WANT RESEARCH PAPER?? I CAN GIVE YOU
@ExcitedGlassRose-hi1xw yes please
Toh ye bhi ek theory hii h experiment kahan h 10:40
I think universe was not created in a way that big bang theory explains, completely it's like a similar process of reproduction, growth and extension. Universe or infinity could be like a point size element earlier atom that it is growing and extending.
vese to mai believe karta hu isme kyoki jis se pehle universe tha us se pehle kya tha aisa to hoga nahi ki first try me life ko janam de diya sari condition perfectly meet karke
baki mujhe bhi itna malumnahi ye argument to mere logic ko temporarily satisfy karne ke liye mai deta hu kyoki is se kuchh better milta hi to vo mai us karne lag jaaunga
Bhai classical mechanics pe videos laoooo ☹️
If no one is recognising you then I will❤️❤️ love you sir
Fine tuning is important for life life is every where in universe,disprove me bro,there is life without oxyjen
Acha lag raha hai aise rational channel aarahe hai india mai
This guy deserves much more ❤.
Multiverse ko dekha kisne😂😂😂
Ma proof kar sakta hu
I have read the whole pages o parallel universe :journey through higher dimension but I didn't get to read this one thing there 😂😂😂 0:23
What about 3 body problem
Experimental proofs to Quantum physics ke bhi nhi h I think
What? Are you serious?
@okay.90 I wanted to ask
@@ShubhamKumar-tl8bz koi nah!
@@Arav.kapoor4 can you explain me anything about this
@@ShubhamKumar-tl8bz about? Quantum Physics Or the video?
Feedback: Video wasn't bad but I didn't get any new information which can satisfy my curiosity & due to your clickbait(title & thumbnail)I feel I wasted my time
Good luck for future though 😌
Experimental proof to the theory of evolution kabhi nahin hai too
Quantum Entanglement ko multiverse m interprete krne ka try kr re bs yelog😂😂
Bro, you should work on the information flow in your videos; can be better.
mera bhai JISKO scriptures bol rhe vo bhi Books hn jo likhi gyin h .. hr book Holy book thodi hn..
Gaurav thakur se ek baar debate karo mein chahta huin
Science k 14 aur atheist ki jhat ajj kal kuch zyada hi badh rhe india me 😂 lage rho kuch nhi hone wala
Bhai pata nahi inhe vedon puranon se kya diklat hai, burnol bhijwana chahiye.😂😂😂(aur science ke 14 bachhe inke video dekhte hain jinse puchho to quantum ka matlab nahi bata payenge par ye sab dekh kar khud ko intellectual samajhte hain.)
Yes I believe in multiverse
Thanks bhai ye video banane ke liye. Mujhe bhi bahut time se lag rha tha ki ye log religion claims ko sach proove karne liye kaise bhi ghuma ke science ko jod denge us se .
Antariksh tv ne bhi hagna chalu kiya kuch salo se bas dharm dharm dharm science ke naam pe dhabba hai aise log