This is crazy how the second girl starts off “I’m not against trans people…never will be” shows how terrified this poor girl is. A lot of women are bullied into this stuff
@@Mik3aglin And it's so idiotic because it's the simplest shit to solve.... If everyone just stopped caring and said what they felt, they'd lose all their power. FFS they make up less than 1% of the population, I really don't think anyone will notice if they boycott anything. The problem is the other 50% of the population who don't really care but are just following the crowd by shaming what they're shaming.
All of women’s opinions are based on what they feel comfortable saying around others. That’s why they also very commonly adopt of the stances of the person they spend the most time with (husband)
“A woman is someone that identifies as a woman” but what are they identifying as? How do they not see how stupid that sounds. The fact they they are unable to call out the whole transgender foolishness is sad. It’s not about preference, a “trans woman” is a man that’s pretending to be a woman and Brian is straight. Call out their stupidity and let them rage quit
Yes! You can NOT use the word you're trying to define in the definition of the word. If you do it creates a circular definition which is like a paradox to a computer. It drives me crazy seeing people ask "What is a woman?" and they get the "someone who identifies as a woman "and they don't press back at all. No if someone is identifying as a woman what is that?
They know what it is. Sadly nobody wants to stand against the crowd anymore. Its not even like saying a woman is a human that has the abilty to give birth ( outside of medical issues keeping you from that) is bad or anything its just a FACT. Just like saying if you DONT have the ability to give birth in the sense of not possible at all, not like medical issues, you are a MAN. A BIOLOGICAL man can NOT have a child a BIOLOGICAL women can. Also its very (for a lack of better words) gross that its not even a female genital, its a LITERAL wound that the body always tries to heal. It makes me think literally you could just cut your arm and start going to town on that at that point. It is really sad where this world is going to. People look you dead in the face HEARING how backwards and goofy what they're saying is yet continue to say it.@@Primroseholic
The fact that we're even having to have this conversation is obvious symptom of how screwed up society is now. Did they really just waste this much time on this?
It’s becoming clearer through the whole trans convo that women are significantly more likely to be consensus thinkers, and will simply parrot safe positions rather than form coherent independent thoughts. Or even if they have such thoughts, they are so tempered by cowardice as to be rendered useless
The only reason this conversation exists in the modern world is because life is so easy. Go places where life is very difficult, and this shit is as its always been
The fact that there are people who cannot understand why a man wouldn’t want a fake woman is absolutely astounding. There’s no hate on those people, let them be who they are, but you can’t shame us for not wanting to be with them! This is so insane.
The problem with that as an answer is that unless you are defending “female” and “woman” differently then it’s essentially saying “a woman is a woman” and doesn’t answer the question.
@@Shapes_Quality_Controlwomen= Adult human female. Female= A human with XX chromosome. One of which has certain physical characteristics such as: v@g!na, uterus, mammary glands, wider pelvis, and smaller frame and bone structure which is completely different from a human that carries the XY chromosome aka adult male, aka man. We won’t go with the second definition because we already know what a woman IS. Trying to change the definition and trying too hard to be specific to some idiot that wants to change it for the sake of feelings is futile.
@@latricehds Then the conversation is moot anyway and you shouldn’t bother having it. The problem with the post modern gender movement is it’s inability to describe anything with any precision. If you too will refuse to answer questions with clarity and precision then you are not helping. If someone asked you “what is a woman” and you responded with “I shouldn’t need to explain what a woman is to an idiot” you are doing nothing but stroking your own ego.
@@Shapes_Quality_ControlThe problem with the post modern gender movement is not the inability to describe something with precision, its their refusal to accept actual biology due to lack of logical reasoning and utilizing emotional reasoning. They KNOW what a woman is, but they care too much of how a biological man or woman that has a mental illness feels. Mental illnesses needs to be treated, not glorified to a point of changing our entire American English vocabulary. People need to stop being coddled and need to be corrected these days.
@PhoBos_____ Well that’s fine but recognize that you had to include specifics beyond just “woman” to further define the new terms you’ve introduced which were the qualifiers of “adult” and “female.” This is a language game. You need to know how to play beyond being smug.
@@Tuberiascaesar I think she acts as the bouncer/security. If one of the women needs to go, she walks them out, and explains the ground rules before recording starts. Having her be tiny just diminishes false accusations of assault.
This 12 minutes proves why women should not be any position where quick decisions need to be made, they are answering based on others emotions and perception of them instead of in a fact based reality.
When someone says “I dont see color”, it doesnt mean they dont see physical differences or recognize individual lives. It means that they dont pass judgement or make assumptions based on color. I hate that Gen Z has twisted that phrase into something its not.
I feel like a 3rd grader again with the way I covered my mouth and laughed hysterically because Brian said “Natural p*ssy juice.” It should NOT have tickled me as much as it did 😂😂😂
We’re able to splice the genome, land people on other planets, engineer colossal structures and generate algorithms that create artificial intelligence, but we struggle to answer a question a three year old knows. It’s just disgusting.
I was non-binary for like 5 years, Thankfully I escaped the anxietized pit of that Idation, I am autistic and I feel Looking back on it that I was very manipulated by the society around me, Even when I was non-binary though I always thought "gender's a social construct" was the most stupid thing i'd ever heard, I remember listening to a podcast of 2 transmen talking about how Gender is a social construct, And could not help but think if it was a social construct then no one would be trans, Then everyone would just be what they are raised as, The whole point of being transgender is not a social construct, Certain things we attach to it might be a social construct, Like boys likling blue and girls liking pink, On the other hand some things we attach to it are for a reason, Girls tend to like more drawing and dress up and dolls, Boys tend to like action figures, fighting wrestling, And trucks, There are of course exceptions, It is not a hard fast rule, And the problem is people try to make it one, My mom told me I could not have dinosaur toys when I was 5 years old because they are boys toys, At 5 years old I thought I must not be a girl, For guys who may have more of a feminine leaning, Maybe they're not as aggressive as their brothers, They prefer playing with their sisters with dolls and coloring, We all have different tendencies there's the standard and the outliers, now that more feminine leaning kid will be told he's not a boy unless he likes these things which can cause Early onset Gender dysphoria, Just because you've had it since you're a little kid does not mean that it's right, I speak from personal experience, I also started puberty at 7 and was done at 10, like when I was 10 i looked 15, which I believe caused a lot of my gender dysphoria, from Society around you, confusing you, To your own personal Circumstances, its all just very sad, thank the lord I got out, Your mental state gets so much better when you know you're not a mistake or a medical anomaly, And regardless of what they say, I was in the community, I knew countless of trans and non-binary who all felt like they were a mistake, I felt the same too the same thoughts Went through my head when I went to bed and woke up, And everything in between, Good luck, You are beautiful, I'm sorry you felt that you weren't enough as you are, You Never had to change, You can wear that and like that and still be the sex you are
I read your whole text and it sounds like those Netflix specials describing how people escape cults. Im glad that you got out and Im very happy you are now at peace. The current state of affairs in the world with this massive online cult is more my fault than is yours. Yes you are at fault as well and having MH does not give you a pardon. I however and men like me are more at fault as we are supposed to protect you from literal groomers that have infiltrated our schools and government functions to recruit for their War on the West. And one more thing before Im gone…You were not non binary for 5 years or for any length of time.
What is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? and so on
People just need to remember that when you open things up too much in society and want to accept everybody for who they are no matter how wacked, you open the door for everyone and its a slippery slope.
You can't say, "A woman is someone who identifies as a woman." That doesn't answer the question of what a woman is. You just created a circle back to the term you were asked to define. I appreciate the XX chromosome definition, but there are some men born with XXY as well as XYY. So a better answer would be, "An adult human female who's genetics do not contain a Y chromosome." In my opinion of course.
Why do you have to provide an explanation for not wanting to date someone? I've been turned down numerous times by women and never felt they had an obligation to explain their decision.
Someone should have asked Blue this question. Would she feel some kind of way if she marries a man and then later finds out he had a vasectomy and he can't give her the children she was expecting?
It's beside the point though. It's not about children, it's about the fact that it's a man. Same as when she said "you don't like someone with plastic surgery, that's fine". It's not about the amount of plastic surgery either, it's the fact that it's a goddamn man 😂
@@mrkiky you forget you're trying to convey a message to idiots. You can't keep saying its a man, because they've been brainwashed already. You have to literally paint the picture for them and conect the dots for them to see that their logic is dumb and doesnt make sense. a specific example such as a woman who wants kids marrying a transgender man who has a 100% chance of never getting her pregnant and giving her the children she wants.
Being a woman isn’t a feeling it’s a biological reality, you’re either a woman who is an adult with XX chromosomes or you’re not a woman and don’t have XX chromosomes.
The fact that certain people are so brain dead or scared to answer this obvious question will never be surprising. We somehow in our vast knowledge of all things that exist, something even the animal kingdom knows, but we can’t answer in 3 seconds. If you still know what a woman truly is, hold fast to your sanity, the future depends on you.
This host is so bad. These girls literally said “a woman is a woman who identifies as a woman”. And he accepted that answer without pushing them on what they are identifying as and mentioning its a circular definition.
He did ask them that.... I think Brain just doesn't want to be confrontational. He just wants to let them speak their minds. We don't need him to push back. Since we can tell they're brainwashed.
If I buy a Toyota MR2, pull the body from it and replace it with a Ferrari fibreglass body it may look the goods from a distance but is it a real Ferrari? No its not truth.
I found a comment on r/asktransgender that explains this problem very well, here it is: I may be in the minority, but I actually like this question. It is, ultimately, a very pro-trans question. At least, if you take it seriously and not just as a gotcha question. If you ask "what is a woman" (or a man, but for simplicity's sake let's take that as assumed), you are essentially asking for a definition. For some criteria that can be applied to anyone, and that will faithfully tell you whether that person is, in fact, a woman. That's fine. Nothing wrong with definitions. But let's be very clear what we're thus looking for a test that: • can distinguish women from non-women, and • successfully identifies all women. That is, it must be 100% accurate. It cannot leave any women out, and cannot accidentally identify any non-women as women. (i.e. no false positives and no false negatives.) 100% is a pretty stringent level of accuracy to reach, but it necessarily must be so: the question essentially asks "what are the defining qualities of women", in which case all women must share those qualities, whatever they might be, literally by definition. And conversely, no non-woman can also share all such qualities, or by definition, that person would also be a woman! And anyway, whoever asked the "what is a woman" question can hardly cringe at requiring such a high standard, can they? One presumes they want a reliable answer to their question, right? Moreover, as a less purely logical but definitely common-sense criteria, we should add one more thing to our test: • it should agree with "obvious" cases. That is to say, if you can point to someone who everyone agrees is a woman (e.g. Gal Godot or somebody), then the test should also indicate that they're a woman. Likewise, the test should never identify as a woman someone everyone agrees is a man. Otherwise, you permit non-sensical tests which, for example, might be pointlessly restrictive or pointlessly broad, to the extent that they are useless for any actual purpose within society. There will always be edge cases of people where everyone doesn't all agree that that person is a woman, but that's exactly why we need this test, right? That's exactly why the question is being asked in the first place. We want a test that is definitely correct for the obvious cases, so we can have confidence that it's right for the edge cases too. And again, whoever asked the question shouldn't object to that requirement either, because after all, they are asking the question in the context of a society, and one presumes they want to be able to apply the test in actual social settings. Now that we know what properties such a test should have--gives a yes/no answer for everyone and is never wrong (which implicitly means it will agree with the obvious cases anyway)--we can start to ask what the test is looking for. Here, we can work from the outside in, from the superficial to the internal, and see where we end up. Perhaps the measure of a woman is in clothing, hairstyles, and makeup? The most obvious, most superficial measure of all. Except, no, that can't be right. Such a test would identify skillful drag queens as women, even though everyone (including the drag queens!) agrees that they are not women. Fine, then. Get rid of the clothes and go one layer deeper. Maybe the measure of a woman is her boobs and vagina. Except, no, that can't be right either. What if you have a vagina but no boobs? Either because they're too small, or because of breast cancer, or because you're pre-pubescent? And boob-growth is a continuous process, so how do you draw the line between what is and isn't "enough boob" to qualify someone as a woman? Well, if boobs are problematic, then what about reproductive capability? Except, again, what if you don't have that? There are plenty of people who society absolutely agrees are women even though they're infertile. Maybe they have really bad PCOS. Maybe they had a hystercetomy. Maybe their bodies never developed a uterus in the first place (this happens in something like 1 out of every 10000 female births). Ok, forget reproduction. Maybe the measure of a woman is the absence of a penis! Ha! What about that? Sure. So long as you're willing to say that soldiers who got their dicks blown off when their Humvee drove over an IED are women, then I guess that works. Oh, you're not willing to say that? Yeah, neither am I. Also, that fails the "obvious cases" criteria. Is it hormones? Does that determine womanhood? Well, no, because a) hormones change throughout life so there's no single determinative standard you could use for hormone levels, and b) again sometimes medical conditions mess with your hormones in ways that would make the test disagree with some obvious cases of women. But the chromosomes! Show me those two X chromosomes! Well, hate to disappoint you, but there are a lot of genetic conditions that can yield people who are obvious cases of women yet don't have the typical two-X chromosome pattern. People who, if this was your test, you would absolutely for sure swear were completely obvious women, until you looked at their chromosomes. The most extreme example of this is CAIS, which yields an individual with XY chromosomes but with the most extreme feminization possible because their bodies simply do not respond at all to androgen hormones. Like, literally the most feminine people possible are CAIS XY individuals. And if that's not enough to get someone to shut up about chromosomes, then I don't know what. Fine, so not chromosomes. Maybe the measure of womanhood is something less tangible. Maybe it's life experiences. After all, women are socialized different and have different experiences growing up. Women are subject to marginalizations that men aren't. Perhaps this is the test we need! (This is a frequent TERF argument, by the way.) Except it doesn't work, because socialization and marginalization are very different from one society to another. Which means that, like with the boobs, you can't have one standard that correctly identifies all women. This fails one of the basic requirements for our test. And, coarsely speaking, such a test would say that women in matriarchal societies, where women are the politically dominant gender, are not women. Or that the Queen of England is not a woman because she has too much status and power. C'mon. So, jeez, what the hell is left? Everything we can possibly measure doesn't work because some people still manage to be obviously women while not fitting that measurement! And, yeah. That's the problem with human diversity, borne of our messy biology and equally messy nature as social animals. We are so diverse that any such measures will inevitably fail. But there is one thing left. One thing that doesn't have this problem. That thing is a woman's inner gender identity. This one thing is different precisely because it is not subject to external measurement. It is only measurable subjectively. Internally, within the woman's own mind. Which is exactly the conclusion we should come to. Because the measure of a woman--that is, whether you should label someone else as a woman--is not something you can measure. It is not something externally visible, not even if you amplify the power of your vision with microscopes and biochemical testing. The measure of a woman is that her gender identity is female. And because gender identity is inherently subjective, because it is a phenomenon that emerges from the complex operation of our minds, because it is an essential aspect of our deepest selves, it can only be observed by our selves. I, and I alone, am capable of observing what my gender identity truly is. You, and you alone, are capable of observing what your gender identity truly is. Neither of us has any authority whatsoever to declare what the other's gender identity is based on anything we can observe or even theoretically observe. If you want to know if someone is a woman, the literal and logical best you can do is to ask her, and to believe her answer. Subjective determination must be the the measure of a woman, because all other tests fail. This is all that's left. That is why "what is a woman", or "what is a man", are such a profoundly pro-trans questions. Because if you actually take those questions seriously, they force you down a line of reasoning which ends at respecting everyone's autonomy to determine and assert what their own identity is.
brian didnt cook anything. just like always its hard for brian to get his point across. hes not blunt when it comes to saying what he needs to say. JUST SAY THAT IF A MEN WANTS TO DATE/HOOK UP WITH A MEN PRETENDING TO BE A WOMEN, ITS GAY. THATS IT.
Floral girl has the crazy eye like every other take. Hope she gets the help she needs. Gotta be open to the facts and not what you feel. Reality is a hell of a pill.
Does it really matter that he had to explain the "genitalia preference" part for that girl to say it's ok? She asked a question, he answered, she agreed. That other girl in the middle insists an explanation SHOULD be unnecessary. It really shouldn't. Facts need to be shared
"Whats a gamer?" "Someone who identifies as a gamer." "Okay so wtf is a gamer tho?" "😣😠 someone who identifies as a gamer!" "But what if i dont know what a gamer is?" This is why you dont answer a question with the question in it.
The fact that some people can’t answer this question that they could’ve easily answered three years ago is pathetic
It is a way for sect\cult to recognise loyal followers.
Exactly lol. What is a women 😳 🤔 uhh an adult human female .. !
She never knew she'd ever stumble upon this question ever again in her lifetime until it haunted her back
where do u get off,.........................hetero-splaining factual biology to me,..................gtfoutta here
Sheeple... follow
This is crazy how the second girl starts off “I’m not against trans people…never will be” shows how terrified this poor girl is. A lot of women are bullied into this stuff
The Fear of being cancelled is insane
She should grow some balls.
@@Mik3aglin And it's so idiotic because it's the simplest shit to solve.... If everyone just stopped caring and said what they felt, they'd lose all their power. FFS they make up less than 1% of the population, I really don't think anyone will notice if they boycott anything. The problem is the other 50% of the population who don't really care but are just following the crowd by shaming what they're shaming.
It's terrifying 🙀
I agree with her
I have no disrespect for trans women but they aren't "real women".
All of women’s opinions are based on what they feel comfortable saying around others. That’s why they also very commonly adopt of the stances of the person they spend the most time with (husband)
“A woman is someone that identifies as a woman” but what are they identifying as? How do they not see how stupid that sounds. The fact they they are unable to call out the whole transgender foolishness is sad. It’s not about preference, a “trans woman” is a man that’s pretending to be a woman and Brian is straight. Call out their stupidity and let them rage quit
Yes! You can NOT use the word you're trying to define in the definition of the word. If you do it creates a circular definition which is like a paradox to a computer. It drives me crazy seeing people ask "What is a woman?" and they get the "someone who identifies as a woman "and they don't press back at all. No if someone is identifying as a woman what is that?
They know what it is. Sadly nobody wants to stand against the crowd anymore. Its not even like saying a woman is a human that has the abilty to give birth ( outside of medical issues keeping you from that) is bad or anything its just a FACT. Just like saying if you DONT have the ability to give birth in the sense of not possible at all, not like medical issues, you are a MAN. A BIOLOGICAL man can NOT have a child a BIOLOGICAL women can. Also its very (for a lack of better words) gross that its not even a female genital, its a LITERAL wound that the body always tries to heal. It makes me think literally you could just cut your arm and start going to town on that at that point. It is really sad where this world is going to. People look you dead in the face HEARING how backwards and goofy what they're saying is yet continue to say it.@@Primroseholic
@@Primroseholic exactly!! It makes no sense at all. If you showed this video to someone 12 years ago theyd think we have all gone mad
@@thatlightskinpanda this is why I need him to get Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsh in this show. They both know how to handle this level of stupidity
It's called circular reasoning, and it infuriates me.
You hit the nail on the head.
“People are allowed to have genitalia preference” took me out 😂😂😂😂
I can’t believe this is what society has been reduced to. Too many clowns
The fact that we're even having to have this conversation is obvious symptom of how screwed up society is now. Did they really just waste this much time on this?
Yeah, not too long ago, "I don't want to fuck men who think they're women" wouldn't have even required a debate.
very sad indeed
Adult human female. Not hard lol
Yes, we wasted our lives listening to women who don't know what women are.
American society
Cowardice society. They don’t wanna offend their friends or they don’t want to get fired from their jobs
It’s becoming clearer through the whole trans convo that women are significantly more likely to be consensus thinkers, and will simply parrot safe positions rather than form coherent independent thoughts. Or even if they have such thoughts, they are so tempered by cowardice as to be rendered useless
I no longer accociate myself with people who can't answer this question correctly.
AN ADULT HUMAN FEMALE. Say it with me AN ADULT HUMAN FEMALE.
The fact that everyones answer to this question is longer than 7 seconds is just absolutely fucking astounding
The only reason this conversation exists in the modern world is because life is so easy. Go places where life is very difficult, and this shit is as its always been
Earthquake in Afghanistan and all out war in Israel, child sex trafficking everywhere.
Just look at Ukraine, the women could leave the men could not….
@johnnybgood5008 and they did lol ran like hell
The fact that there are people who cannot understand why a man wouldn’t want a fake woman is absolutely astounding. There’s no hate on those people, let them be who they are, but you can’t shame us for not wanting to be with them! This is so insane.
It's not about what a man may or may not want. It's about whether he's allowed to have a preference or not.
We might not want them and that’s okay but the circus 🤡 needs them
'Why can't we just love people???'...... also rejects any man who is under 6 foot....😑😑😑😑😑😑
An adult human female. That is the answer to Brian’s question. Simple. Short, sweet and to the point.
The problem with that as an answer is that unless you are defending “female” and “woman” differently then it’s essentially saying “a woman is a woman” and doesn’t answer the question.
@@Shapes_Quality_Controlwomen= Adult human female.
Female= A human with XX chromosome. One of which has certain physical characteristics such as: v@g!na, uterus, mammary glands, wider pelvis, and smaller frame and bone structure which is completely different from a human that carries the XY chromosome aka adult male, aka man.
We won’t go with the second definition because we already know what a woman IS. Trying to change the definition and trying too hard to be specific to some idiot that wants to change it for the sake of feelings is futile.
@@latricehds Then the conversation is moot anyway and you shouldn’t bother having it. The problem with the post modern gender movement is it’s inability to describe anything with any precision. If you too will refuse to answer questions with clarity and precision then you are not helping. If someone asked you “what is a woman” and you responded with “I shouldn’t need to explain what a woman is to an idiot” you are doing nothing but stroking your own ego.
@@Shapes_Quality_ControlThe problem with the post modern gender movement is not the inability to describe something with precision, its their refusal to accept actual biology due to lack of logical reasoning and utilizing emotional reasoning. They KNOW what a woman is, but they care too much of how a biological man or woman that has a mental illness feels. Mental illnesses needs to be treated, not glorified to a point of changing our entire American English vocabulary. People need to stop being coddled and need to be corrected these days.
@PhoBos_____ Well that’s fine but recognize that you had to include specifics beyond just “woman” to further define the new terms you’ve introduced which were the qualifiers of “adult” and “female.” This is a language game. You need to know how to play beyond being smug.
These are the dumbest arguments... it's like arguing whether the Easter bunny is real
had to stop watching it's mind numbing drivel - not sure if society can sink much lower
No, the Easter bunny being real is more valid
It's hard to come up with a rebuttal, when you're defending something so stupid.
Like arguing reality with a cult member
The girl in the helmet is the symbol of this channel
I'm still trying to find out why she wears the helmet.
@@Tuberiascaesar I think she acts as the bouncer/security. If one of the women needs to go, she walks them out, and explains the ground rules before recording starts. Having her be tiny just diminishes false accusations of assault.
@@jbirkins She have martial arts training then lol. I still don't get the point of world war 1 helmet though.
Arch Duke!
@@Tuberiascaesarshe’s the Roman emperor
Whoever didnt answer 'an adult human female' is exactly whats wrong with the world. Especially the clown in yellow withthe hat
The xx chromosome is an acceptable answer. Also if they had mentioned the pelvic bone, would have been another one.
Good to know that not everyone is completely delusional. Starting to get crazy out here
Question: What is a woman?
Answer: Ya Momma
This 12 minutes proves why women should not be any position where quick decisions need to be made, they are answering based on others emotions and perception of them instead of in a fact based reality.
Now imagine them in critical military and business positions etc.
@@MusicalMemeologyapparently tanks have genders too and debating if I use a tank it will hurt it it’s feelings
When someone says “I dont see color”, it doesnt mean they dont see physical differences or recognize individual lives. It means that they dont pass judgement or make assumptions based on color. I hate that Gen Z has twisted that phrase into something its not.
That's the whole point she is making. She doesn't see anyone any other way than the way they wish to be seen. As a Human.
Lol listen to some of these not trying to get cancelled. A woman is "of nature" able to give birth.
I feel like a 3rd grader again with the way I covered my mouth and laughed hysterically because Brian said “Natural p*ssy juice.”
It should NOT have tickled me as much as it did 😂😂😂
Guess I’m in your class too lol
😂😂😂
We’re able to splice the genome, land people on other planets, engineer colossal structures and generate algorithms that create artificial intelligence, but we struggle to answer a question a three year old knows. It’s just disgusting.
I was non-binary for like 5 years, Thankfully I escaped the anxietized pit of that Idation, I am autistic and I feel Looking back on it that I was very manipulated by the society around me, Even when I was non-binary though I always thought "gender's a social construct" was the most stupid thing i'd ever heard, I remember listening to a podcast of 2 transmen talking about how Gender is a social construct, And could not help but think if it was a social construct then no one would be trans, Then everyone would just be what they are raised as, The whole point of being transgender is not a social construct, Certain things we attach to it might be a social construct, Like boys likling blue and girls liking pink, On the other hand some things we attach to it are for a reason, Girls tend to like more drawing and dress up and dolls, Boys tend to like action figures, fighting wrestling, And trucks, There are of course exceptions, It is not a hard fast rule, And the problem is people try to make it one, My mom told me I could not have dinosaur toys when I was 5 years old because they are boys toys, At 5 years old I thought I must not be a girl,
For guys who may have more of a feminine leaning, Maybe they're not as aggressive as their brothers, They prefer playing with their sisters with dolls and coloring, We all have different tendencies there's the standard and the outliers, now that more feminine leaning kid will be told he's not a boy unless he likes these things which can cause Early onset Gender dysphoria, Just because you've had it since you're a little kid does not mean that it's right, I speak from personal experience, I also started puberty at 7 and was done at 10, like when I was 10 i looked 15, which I believe caused a lot of my gender dysphoria, from Society around you, confusing you, To your own personal Circumstances, its all just very sad, thank the lord I got out, Your mental state gets so much better when you know you're not a mistake or a medical anomaly, And regardless of what they say, I was in the community, I knew countless of trans and non-binary who all felt like they were a mistake, I felt the same too the same thoughts Went through my head when I went to bed and woke up, And everything in between, Good luck, You are beautiful, I'm sorry you felt that you weren't enough as you are, You Never had to change, You can wear that and like that and still be the sex you are
I read your whole text and it sounds like those Netflix specials describing how people escape cults.
Im glad that you got out and Im very happy you are now at peace.
The current state of affairs in the world with this massive online cult is more my fault than is yours. Yes you are at fault as well and having MH does not give you a pardon.
I however and men like me are more at fault as we are supposed to protect you from literal groomers that have infiltrated our schools and government functions to recruit for their War on the West.
And one more thing before Im gone…You were not non binary for 5 years or for any length of time.
The girl who was saving herself for marriage couldn’t define woman? That’s new.
Its funny how they shift and change their answer depending on how much affirmation they get from the other women. Its not about truth or facts.
The reason I won’t sleep with a trans woman is simply because I don’t wanna
No explanation not up for discussion
What is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? Someone that identifies as a woman. Ok, so when someone identifies as a woman, what are they identifying as? A woman? So what is a woman? and so on
Today...., Wait for it, I identify as a NINJA,...Dyh, Duh, Duh.😆😆😆😆
People who refuse to speak the truth when answering this question have no choice but to constantly beg the question.
People just need to remember that when you open things up too much in society and want to accept everybody for who they are no matter how wacked, you open the door for everyone and its a slippery slope.
You can't say, "A woman is someone who identifies as a woman." That doesn't answer the question of what a woman is. You just created a circle back to the term you were asked to define.
I appreciate the XX chromosome definition, but there are some men born with XXY as well as XYY. So a better answer would be, "An adult human female who's genetics do not contain a Y chromosome." In my opinion of course.
Why do you have to provide an explanation for not wanting to date someone? I've been turned down numerous times by women and never felt they had an obligation to explain their decision.
Sooner we will probably hear a cat say that he wanted to be a dog 🤣
And camels will say they want to be horses etc. 😂
@@lukasnagel4492 That’s madness 🤣
Wow… the struggle to answer is incredible
Thank you brian . We need to have these conversations
the American education and higher education system... just beautiful
Someone should have asked Blue this question.
Would she feel some kind of way if she marries a man and then later finds out he had a vasectomy and he can't give her the children she was expecting?
It's beside the point though. It's not about children, it's about the fact that it's a man. Same as when she said "you don't like someone with plastic surgery, that's fine". It's not about the amount of plastic surgery either, it's the fact that it's a goddamn man 😂
@@mrkiky you forget you're trying to convey a message to idiots. You can't keep saying its a man, because they've been brainwashed already. You have to literally paint the picture for them and conect the dots for them to see that their logic is dumb and doesnt make sense. a specific example such as a woman who wants kids marrying a transgender man who has a 100% chance of never getting her pregnant and giving her the children she wants.
Being a woman isn’t a feeling it’s a biological reality, you’re either a woman who is an adult with XX chromosomes or you’re not a woman and don’t have XX chromosomes.
but stupid you dont get to check anyones chromosomes
They should've brought Matt Walsh on this episode to educate these girls 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What some fail to understand is that language and definitions matter. If not, then the fabric of society is damaged.
What is a woman? - An adult human that has two X chromosomes.
Brian didn’t cook…he was pulling teeth from these girls…😒
Humans are devolving
... there's no such thing as devolving. Evolution doesn't have a trajectory.
I was born black, but I identify as white, so I'm white.
A woman is someone who identifies as a woman.
BUT WHAT IS THAT!?
Sex is biology. (Male, female)
Gender is language ex. He=male, she=female, it=object
We are doomed.
THEY LET THE MAN COOK!!! KEEP COOKING BRIAN!!!
Women accept this until They come for their men
The fact that certain people are so brain dead or scared to answer this obvious question will never be surprising. We somehow in our vast knowledge of all things that exist, something even the animal kingdom knows, but we can’t answer in 3 seconds. If you still know what a woman truly is, hold fast to your sanity, the future depends on you.
tough questions in 2023 .....i need to leave this planet
"Define woman without using the word woman" 🐸 🍵
using the word in the definition is wild holy fuck
Q: If you cannot identify what a woman is then how can you identify AS a woman?
A: You cannot.
Thinking you can guage a persons life experience by their skin colour is insanely racist.
Hat girl makes me wish I was on the 100th Floor of the Twin Towers.😊
Thats not a hat
Thats a crepe.....
She's insufferable
I don't need to present an argument to articulate my preferences.
I can’t believe a woman can sit there & say they don’t know what a woman is!!! This world is crazy!!!
A woman is someone who identifies as a woman lol
@@Jakob_23What are they identifying as?
@PhoBos_____ of course I’m trolling that’s why I said lol at the end
Before asking the most difficult question in 2023 we have to ask people what is a definition before asking the definition of a woman…
Absolute joke
How do you identify as something you cant define?
Brian: "I don't want to use KY jelly, I want a chick that's just...it's like a river son!" 😂😂
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, all the rest of the genders are from Uranus.
Here's the only argument for a guy not having sex with a trans: my body, my choice
The second girl knows that what she is saying is rubbish.
Build yourself a backbone and answer truthfully.
It's crazy that the second weirdest hat on this episode is the German helmet.
It's a mutilated man. Why the hell would any straight man want a mutilated man as his partner??
What an absolutely ridiculous conversation.
This host is so bad. These girls literally said “a woman is a woman who identifies as a woman”. And he accepted that answer without pushing them on what they are identifying as and mentioning its a circular definition.
He did ask them that.... I think Brain just doesn't want to be confrontational. He just wants to let them speak their minds. We don't need him to push back. Since we can tell they're brainwashed.
7:16 they do love cancel culture, they know it benefits them. Nice clip brian. DOnt tell me it doesnt exist. DOnt gaslight me lol
If I buy a Toyota MR2, pull the body from it and replace it with a Ferrari fibreglass body it may look the goods from a distance but is it a real Ferrari? No its not truth.
I found a comment on r/asktransgender that explains this problem very well, here it is:
I may be in the minority, but I actually like this question. It is, ultimately, a very pro-trans question. At least, if you take it seriously and not just as a gotcha question.
If you ask "what is a woman" (or a man, but for simplicity's sake let's take that as assumed), you are essentially asking for a definition. For some criteria that can be applied to anyone, and that will faithfully tell you whether that person is, in fact, a woman.
That's fine. Nothing wrong with definitions. But let's be very clear what we're thus looking for a test that:
• can distinguish women from non-women, and
• successfully identifies all women. That is, it must be 100% accurate. It cannot leave any women out, and cannot accidentally identify any non-women as women. (i.e. no false positives and no false negatives.)
100% is a pretty stringent level of accuracy to reach, but it necessarily must be so: the question essentially asks "what are the defining qualities of women", in which case all women must share those qualities, whatever they might be, literally by definition. And conversely, no non-woman can also share all such qualities, or by definition, that person would also be a woman!
And anyway, whoever asked the "what is a woman" question can hardly cringe at requiring such a high standard, can they? One presumes they want a reliable answer to their question, right?
Moreover, as a less purely logical but definitely common-sense criteria, we should add one more thing to our test:
• it should agree with "obvious" cases.
That is to say, if you can point to someone who everyone agrees is a woman (e.g. Gal Godot or somebody), then the test should also indicate that they're a woman. Likewise, the test should never identify as a woman someone everyone agrees is a man. Otherwise, you permit non-sensical tests which, for example, might be pointlessly restrictive or pointlessly broad, to the extent that they are useless for any actual purpose within society. There will always be edge cases of people where everyone doesn't all agree that that person is a woman, but that's exactly why we need this test, right? That's exactly why the question is being asked in the first place. We want a test that is definitely correct for the obvious cases, so we can have confidence that it's right for the edge cases too.
And again, whoever asked the question shouldn't object to that requirement either, because after all, they are asking the question in the context of a society, and one presumes they want to be able to apply the test in actual social settings.
Now that we know what properties such a test should have--gives a yes/no answer for everyone and is never wrong (which implicitly means it will agree with the obvious cases anyway)--we can start to ask what the test is looking for.
Here, we can work from the outside in, from the superficial to the internal, and see where we end up.
Perhaps the measure of a woman is in clothing, hairstyles, and makeup? The most obvious, most superficial measure of all. Except, no, that can't be right. Such a test would identify skillful drag queens as women, even though everyone (including the drag queens!) agrees that they are not women.
Fine, then. Get rid of the clothes and go one layer deeper. Maybe the measure of a woman is her boobs and vagina. Except, no, that can't be right either. What if you have a vagina but no boobs? Either because they're too small, or because of breast cancer, or because you're pre-pubescent? And boob-growth is a continuous process, so how do you draw the line between what is and isn't "enough boob" to qualify someone as a woman?
Well, if boobs are problematic, then what about reproductive capability? Except, again, what if you don't have that? There are plenty of people who society absolutely agrees are women even though they're infertile. Maybe they have really bad PCOS. Maybe they had a hystercetomy. Maybe their bodies never developed a uterus in the first place (this happens in something like 1 out of every 10000 female births).
Ok, forget reproduction. Maybe the measure of a woman is the absence of a penis! Ha! What about that? Sure. So long as you're willing to say that soldiers who got their dicks blown off when their Humvee drove over an IED are women, then I guess that works. Oh, you're not willing to say that? Yeah, neither am I. Also, that fails the "obvious cases" criteria.
Is it hormones? Does that determine womanhood? Well, no, because a) hormones change throughout life so there's no single determinative standard you could use for hormone levels, and b) again sometimes medical conditions mess with your hormones in ways that would make the test disagree with some obvious cases of women.
But the chromosomes! Show me those two X chromosomes! Well, hate to disappoint you, but there are a lot of genetic conditions that can yield people who are obvious cases of women yet don't have the typical two-X chromosome pattern. People who, if this was your test, you would absolutely for sure swear were completely obvious women, until you looked at their chromosomes. The most extreme example of this is CAIS, which yields an individual with XY chromosomes but with the most extreme feminization possible because their bodies simply do not respond at all to androgen hormones. Like, literally the most feminine people possible are CAIS XY individuals. And if that's not enough to get someone to shut up about chromosomes, then I don't know what.
Fine, so not chromosomes. Maybe the measure of womanhood is something less tangible. Maybe it's life experiences. After all, women are socialized different and have different experiences growing up. Women are subject to marginalizations that men aren't. Perhaps this is the test we need! (This is a frequent TERF argument, by the way.) Except it doesn't work, because socialization and marginalization are very different from one society to another. Which means that, like with the boobs, you can't have one standard that correctly identifies all women. This fails one of the basic requirements for our test. And, coarsely speaking, such a test would say that women in matriarchal societies, where women are the politically dominant gender, are not women. Or that the Queen of England is not a woman because she has too much status and power. C'mon.
So, jeez, what the hell is left? Everything we can possibly measure doesn't work because some people still manage to be obviously women while not fitting that measurement! And, yeah. That's the problem with human diversity, borne of our messy biology and equally messy nature as social animals. We are so diverse that any such measures will inevitably fail.
But there is one thing left. One thing that doesn't have this problem. That thing is a woman's inner gender identity. This one thing is different precisely because it is not subject to external measurement. It is only measurable subjectively. Internally, within the woman's own mind.
Which is exactly the conclusion we should come to. Because the measure of a woman--that is, whether you should label someone else as a woman--is not something you can measure. It is not something externally visible, not even if you amplify the power of your vision with microscopes and biochemical testing.
The measure of a woman is that her gender identity is female. And because gender identity is inherently subjective, because it is a phenomenon that emerges from the complex operation of our minds, because it is an essential aspect of our deepest selves, it can only be observed by our selves.
I, and I alone, am capable of observing what my gender identity truly is. You, and you alone, are capable of observing what your gender identity truly is. Neither of us has any authority whatsoever to declare what the other's gender identity is based on anything we can observe or even theoretically observe.
If you want to know if someone is a woman, the literal and logical best you can do is to ask her, and to believe her answer. Subjective determination must be the the measure of a woman, because all other tests fail. This is all that's left.
That is why "what is a woman", or "what is a man", are such a profoundly pro-trans questions. Because if you actually take those questions seriously, they force you down a line of reasoning which ends at respecting everyone's autonomy to determine and assert what their own identity is.
6:00 - 'First they would have to present their argument'
My argument: "No"
the fact its hard for most of them to say what a woman is, is the craziest thing!
This question would be the one of the easiest questions on a schooltest in the 90s lol
My brain hurts!
A woman is an adult human female.
Strange that an obvious fact like this is hard for people nowadays
brian didnt cook anything. just like always its hard for brian to get his point across. hes not blunt when it comes to saying what he needs to say. JUST SAY THAT IF A MEN WANTS TO DATE/HOOK UP WITH A MEN PRETENDING TO BE A WOMEN, ITS GAY. THATS IT.
I like the way the girl with the wavy hair and the white shirt thinks
The man Drops the mic 🎙️🤘😎🤘🍻
Floral girl has the crazy eye like every other take. Hope she gets the help she needs. Gotta be open to the facts and not what you feel. Reality is a hell of a pill.
If I identify as the Archbishop of Canterbury, it doesnt make me that.
Does it really matter that he had to explain the "genitalia preference" part for that girl to say it's ok? She asked a question, he answered, she agreed. That other girl in the middle insists an explanation SHOULD be unnecessary. It really shouldn't. Facts need to be shared
"Whats a gamer?"
"Someone who identifies as a gamer."
"Okay so wtf is a gamer tho?"
"😣😠 someone who identifies as a gamer!"
"But what if i dont know what a gamer is?"
This is why you dont answer a question with the question in it.
They are SO WEAK! They have to make a definition that doesn’t offend someone🤣
Why people is having such a Difficult Time answering this SIMPLE Question ??
The right side of the panel made me lose more brain cells than usual.😅
I for one don't give into other peoples' delusions.
This should'nt even be a conversation to begin with, society has strayed so far from God it's ridiculous!!!
It’s not natural!!! That’s all you had to say Brian lol
ill never agree with the side that thinks cutting off your own penis and getting a surgery to have it changed into a vagina is okay and normal.
You cannot give a definition of something and still have that something in that sentence. A carrot is a carrot (this is not a definition).
His boundary can be summed up by simply explaining that he’s not homosexual. These people are very out of touch.
When the host said something about the sex thing killed me lol. (The Virgin girl)
Never thought I'd have to explain what a woman is .. I just am a woman..no explanation needed
All their answers are painfull
An adult human female. That’s a woman.