You don't need two WAN interfaces on both routers. You can just use one WAN interface (WAN1) for the VPN connection. Additionally, having static IP addresses can make things easier, but it's not absolutely necessary. We hope this info helps.
People need client to site configurations, including anyconnect and 3rd party client examples. Please do it completely. Cisco docs is very sparse and unclear and it is very dificulty to configure this kind of connections for RV345.I bought one unit and I intend to return it because I cannot configure properly according cisco guide docs. Thx
Hi I just want to clarify for the site to site 6 vpn . RV340 has 50 site to site and another 50 remote. So in my case I have 1 router here and 16PCS. Does this mean that only 49 Site to site left on the vpn and 34left in the remote? OR please correct me if im wrong. PLEASE RESPECT POST
We recommend joining the Cisco Small Business Community at community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-routers/bd-p/5951-discussions-small-business-routers to connect with peers and experts who have experience working with RV340 routers.
The question though is it going to work reliably and fast when you transfer data from one site to the other without maxing cpu of this router and reaching 100Mbps upload/download speed. A lot of non specialized vpn devices will vomit and cough when you give them such tasks for extended amount of time. I need to know if someone used it reliably
hola: Tengo el Corporativo y las sucursales unidos por VPN todos, uso escritorio remotos para el RP en todas las sucursales. quiero conectarme al server desde las sucursales usando el Nombre del Servidor y No la dirección ip. En el corporativo si me conecto al Server desde la misma LAN interna usando el nombre del SERVER, pero cuando quiero conectarme desde una sucursal usando el nombre del server no me resuelve, no lo encuentra el escritorio remoto a través de conexión VPN, solamente con la dirección IP funciona. Que se puede hacer para que el nombre del Server este publico a través de las VPN ?? Muchas Gracias
Check out Cisco Routing Community (community.cisco.com/t5/routing/bd-p/5991-discussions-wan-routing-switching) where you can research or post your technical questions for experts and peers to review.
Necesitas resolución de nombres en las sucursales además del sitio principal, es un tema de DNS y no de la VPN en sí. Así que es posible que necesites un domain controller en cada sucursal que replique contra el principal, y posiblemente habilitar Netbios, LDAP, SMB por la VPN. Así tu sucursal(es) también podrán responder a las consultas de nombre del server y conectar correctamente.
Hello, the site to site VPN connects two sites and allows access to the network ( subnet) on each end. Thus, the number of network devices ( computers) depends on your subnet size. For example, subnet 192.168.1.1 with a mask of 255.255.255.0 equals 254 available IP addresses. Thus 254 computers. Yes, the RV340 can support 60 computers on one end. RV340 admin guide: www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/routers/csbr/RV340/Administration/EN/b_RV340_AG.pdf
@@mikeswenson978 well thats one way to look at it. :) yes IP space available in subnet is a limit. you can change that though. in fact you could backhaul all of RFC1918. The thing to watch for in your case (ducky) is what those 60 computers are doing. figure if they wall watched this youtube movie through it at once, (about 2-3M per user) is way over bw this can handle and is much more of your limitation hardware, not logical limitations that can be changed. Look at total usage for your users concurrently to know if this is going to handle it.
Seductive voice is not suitable for the training purposes. It districts trainees concentration to learn efficiently. 😊 it is a complement and suggestion at the same time 👍🏻😊
Subnet settings were incorrect on both. It should have been 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.10.0. In the example, the LAN gateways were incorrectly used.
Do we need two WAN interface on both routers and Static IPs, so that we can use Internet through separate route and keep s2s VPN on separate WAN.
You don't need two WAN interfaces on both routers. You can just use one WAN interface (WAN1) for the VPN connection. Additionally, having static IP addresses can make things easier, but it's not absolutely necessary. We hope this info helps.
People need client to site configurations, including anyconnect and 3rd party client examples. Please do it completely. Cisco docs is very sparse and unclear and it is very dificulty to configure this kind of connections for RV345.I bought one unit and I intend to return it because I cannot configure properly according cisco guide docs. Thx
Hi I just want to clarify for the site to site 6 vpn . RV340 has 50 site to site and another 50 remote. So in my case I have 1 router here and 16PCS. Does this mean that only 49 Site to site left on the vpn and 34left in the remote? OR please correct me if im wrong. PLEASE RESPECT POST
We recommend joining the Cisco Small Business Community at community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-routers/bd-p/5951-discussions-small-business-routers to connect with peers and experts who have experience working with RV340 routers.
The question though is it going to work reliably and fast when you transfer data from one site to the other without maxing cpu of this router and reaching 100Mbps upload/download speed. A lot of non specialized vpn devices will vomit and cough when you give them such tasks for extended amount of time. I need to know if someone used it reliably
please i need a video (urgent ) about configuration cisco switch c 3850 or SG 300
Hi there we'd love to help! Please refer to the following link: cs.co/6057MVrgB. Let us know if this helps.
Thanks very much! Well Explained!
hola: Tengo el Corporativo y las sucursales unidos por VPN todos, uso escritorio remotos para el RP en todas las sucursales. quiero conectarme al server desde las sucursales usando el Nombre del Servidor y No la dirección ip. En el corporativo si me conecto al Server desde la misma LAN interna usando el nombre del SERVER, pero cuando quiero conectarme desde una sucursal usando el nombre del server no me resuelve, no lo encuentra el escritorio remoto a través de conexión VPN, solamente con la dirección IP funciona. Que se puede hacer para que el nombre del Server este publico a través de las VPN ?? Muchas Gracias
Check out Cisco Routing Community (community.cisco.com/t5/routing/bd-p/5991-discussions-wan-routing-switching) where you can research or post your technical questions for experts and peers to review.
Necesitas resolución de nombres en las sucursales además del sitio principal, es un tema de DNS y no de la VPN en sí. Así que es posible que necesites un domain controller en cada sucursal que replique contra el principal, y posiblemente habilitar Netbios, LDAP, SMB por la VPN. Así tu sucursal(es) también podrán responder a las consultas de nombre del server y conectar correctamente.
I really appreciate this video. Very nice explanation. Thanks so much.
Dumb question, how many computers can I simultaneously connect to this router in this site to site configuration. If I have 60 computer on one end.
Hello, the site to site VPN connects two sites and allows access to the network ( subnet) on each end. Thus, the number of network devices ( computers) depends on your subnet size. For example, subnet 192.168.1.1 with a mask of 255.255.255.0 equals 254 available IP addresses. Thus 254 computers. Yes, the RV340 can support 60 computers on one end. RV340 admin guide: www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/routers/csbr/RV340/Administration/EN/b_RV340_AG.pdf
@@mikeswenson978 well thats one way to look at it. :) yes IP space available in subnet is a limit. you can change that though. in fact you could backhaul all of RFC1918. The thing to watch for in your case (ducky) is what those 60 computers are doing. figure if they wall watched this youtube movie through it at once, (about 2-3M per user) is way over bw this can handle and is much more of your limitation hardware, not logical limitations that can be changed. Look at total usage for your users concurrently to know if this is going to handle it.
Thanks for womansplaining that for me
Well explained 👍
NO
Seductive voice is not suitable for the training purposes. It districts trainees concentration to learn efficiently.
😊 it is a complement and suggestion at the same time 👍🏻😊