What a great video nice job! I tried it and it worked perfectly. Before I analyse more solutions, what parameters do you recommend to change in order to make the coral reef structures thinner and have more of them?
Thanks for this great job. The thing that ı cant understand that why we have to define a heat sink in topology optimizatipn area? When ı define a heat sink in topology optimization area ı got tree geometries but when ı delete heat sink and run again the geometry was not logical. Where is the wrong part? I think topology optimization part must give me truss geometries without heat sink definition if ı define it well in objective function
I have recreated the case but It's not showing me the same results. You have done something intentionally wrong or hidden in objective function and constraints.
I can't but I can share original paper: www.comsol.com/paper/numerical-optimization-of-active-heat-sinks-considering-restrictions-of-selectiv-63691 everything in the model is created based on this article.
Hi, the model is inspired by article from open database of COMSOL Conferences. You can find expressions: www.comsol.com/paper/numerical-optimization-of-active-heat-sinks-considering-restrictions-of-selectiv-63691
Hi everybody, this is an objective function expression: (1-q)*comp1.intop1(k_simp*ht.gradTmag^2)+q*h0*hmax_design/A*comp1.intop1(sqrt(d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,x)^2+d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,y)^2)^2)
Hi! Is it possible for you to make the same tutorial but in 3d dimension?
What a great video nice job! I tried it and it worked perfectly. Before I analyse more solutions, what parameters do you recommend to change in order to make the coral reef structures thinner and have more of them?
Could you share your objective function?
Thanks for this great job. The thing that ı cant understand that why we have to define a heat sink in topology optimizatipn area? When ı define a heat sink in topology optimization area ı got tree geometries but when ı delete heat sink and run again the geometry was not logical. Where is the wrong part? I think topology optimization part must give me truss geometries without heat sink definition if ı define it well in objective function
Not clear about topology concept suggested in this video
I have recreated the case but It's not showing me the same results. You have done something intentionally wrong or hidden in objective function and constraints.
Can you please share or check my model
I can't but I can share original paper: www.comsol.com/paper/numerical-optimization-of-active-heat-sinks-considering-restrictions-of-selectiv-63691 everything in the model is created based on this article.
Heat sink material is not selecting ( it is showing as not applicable) please tell me the reason
hello. can you share the expression of the objective function? thank you! I am trying to learn from you.
Hi, the model is inspired by article from open database of COMSOL Conferences. You can find expressions: www.comsol.com/paper/numerical-optimization-of-active-heat-sinks-considering-restrictions-of-selectiv-63691
You can find the integration in defined function besides the text bar and enter thr ksimo abd Tmag
(1-q)*comp1.intop1(k_simp*ht.gradTmag^2)+q*h0*hmax_design/A*comp1.intop1(sqrt(d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,x)^2+d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,y)^2)^2)
Can someone write the objectivefunction here?
I followed this article: www.comsol.com/paper/numerical-optimization-of-active-heat-sinks-considering-restrictions-of-selectiv-63691
(1-q)*comp1.intop1(k_simp*ht.gradTmag^2)+q*h0*hmax_design/A*comp1.intop1(sqrt(d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,x)^2+d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,y)^2)^2)
@@ZibAmiri thanks. But i have already sorted it out
Hi everybody, this is an objective function expression:
(1-q)*comp1.intop1(k_simp*ht.gradTmag^2)+q*h0*hmax_design/A*comp1.intop1(sqrt(d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,x)^2+d(comp1.dtopo1.theta,y)^2)^2)