What can US Transit Do with the Military Budget? | Amendment One

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @DoubleT_TimothyTurner
    @DoubleT_TimothyTurner 14 часов назад +17

    YES THE SERIES IS BACK! As for the Atlantic Branch to New Jersey, We should connect it to the Hoboken Terminal. The Financial District station will be positioned and pointed to the north, then the Tunnel will run under Greenwich St then turn west at either Canal or Houston St, under the Hudson ending up at Hoboken Terminal to takeover the Hoboken Division. I’m also surprised that the 7 train extension to Secaucus Junction wasn’t included nor a NJ Transit West Trenton Branch.

  • @Pensyfan19
    @Pensyfan19 15 часов назад +15

    Instead of purchasing M9s for through running with NJT, I would strongly encourage purchasing M8s for this service, as they run on both overhead wires and 3rd rail with shoes that run both overhand and underhand. I also feel using the costs of the Ronkonkoma double track project would be a better source for double track costs, as the 3rd track main line project is much more expensive than the Ronkonkoma branch as 3rd track main line also includes station rebuilds and grade separation, in addition to adding a 3rd track.

    • @RocketTrain-0
      @RocketTrain-0 13 часов назад +1

      @@Pensyfan19 I agree here. The M8s like the Arrows were built to run on multiple electrification systems, therefore classifying them as HSR railcars.

    • @az196823
      @az196823 11 часов назад

      You can still get M9s, but with it being multi voltage. With paintegraphs built into the design on an updated platform.

    • @RocketTrain-0
      @RocketTrain-0 11 часов назад +1

      @@az196823 The M9s design prohibits pantographs because their specifications were built for the LIRR. The M8 specifications have both third rail and catenary shoes attached making the M8 fleet more flexible than their M7 & M9 counterparts.

    • @az196823
      @az196823 11 часов назад

      @@RocketTrain-0 So an updated M8 ?

    • @RocketTrain-0
      @RocketTrain-0 11 часов назад

      @ Yep

  • @colbylucas728
    @colbylucas728 15 часов назад +8

    YESSSS thank god this series is back I’ve genuinely been thinking about this every single day!!

  • @brmnyc
    @brmnyc 9 часов назад +3

    I love the idea of extending the subway all the way to Hackensack.

  • @Reformperson
    @Reformperson 14 часов назад +6

    Overall great ideas we could connect the Q to Hackensack to serve the Fort Lee Area. This would allow for better communication to Manhattan. With the Military Budget we can also use that to extend the 7 Train to Secaucus Junction for connections to the NJ Transit trains and buses there. We would also have to expand the orders of the R262s and R268s to accommodate those extensions.
    The Military Budget should include a Staten Island Extension from 95th St serving Staten Island busiest corridors in the North Shore.
    For Atlantic Terminal we can extend that Branch to NJ, but also we can divert NJ Transit Trains there to connect to the Northeast Corridor, as well as The North Jersey Coastline. We also need to expand the new train orders for NJT, and purchase more M9As for the LIRR and metro north and have in service speeds increased to 100mph on the commuter rail lines.
    Doing these changes would greatly benefit NJ and NY for the coming years and into the 22nd Century.
    For the Port Authority they can use that budget to expand the PATH Network to Atlantic Ave in Brooklyn connecting Downtown Brooklyn at Jay St before terminating at Atlantic Ave.
    Now NJ Transit Services would end at Jamaica so that riders can connect to a train to NJ from Queens without going through Manhattan.
    We also need to have a look into the Staten Island Bus Network as there needs to be changes there
    First we need to have buses connect to NJ those being the S48/98, S55/95, and S59/89
    The S48 would run to Union Kean University from the St George Ferry Terminal
    The S55 would be extended Northward to the College of Staten Island, as well as southward to Perth Amboy Station for Staten Islanders to get a one seat ride to NJ. The S95 would be a limited Variant of the S55, having a nonstop segment to The Staten Island Mall where it would then make Limited Stops to Perth Amboy Station.
    Lastly although we know that the S89 goes to Bayonne it only operates on Rush Hours, so why not have the S59 run to Bayonne but we would cut it back to Hylan and Richmond for enhanced NJ Service.
    Now for further improvements we should convert the SIR ROW for Metro North as that would run under a tunnel to Staten Island from Lower Manhattan. The way fare collection would work would be is if anywhere is in the city then they would pay the base subway fare to get there.

  • @נמרודכשדן
    @נמרודכשדן 16 часов назад +4

    Return of the king, any kind of update on this series is goated

  • @MrCubsfan3
    @MrCubsfan3 14 часов назад +2

    I've shared the original video so many times.
    Thank you for this update!!

  • @TheLiamster
    @TheLiamster 16 часов назад +2

    This was a surprise to be sure but a welcome one

  • @aidanpeck180
    @aidanpeck180 14 часов назад +4

    One other thing I was thinking of and might be a little outside of what you know, but Boston’s regional rail network is quite extensive but could absolutely use some work beyond just the north south connector. There are a ton of abandoned lines and bottlenecks that need some work. The old colony mainline is a big one as it it’s partly sigle tracked in Dorchester causing problems for about 3 different lines and soon to be 4. South Coast Rail phase two needs to happen too especially because of the aforementioned bottleneck (south coast rail phase 1 turns one of those three lines into two that both serve major cities in southeastern Mass over 80,000 people). Further there is no MBTA service to Springfield which is the third largest city in the state and could open up a lot of opportunities for connecting trips as there are trains to Hartford and Beyond. Furthermore there really should be trains from Worcester to Providence and potentially trains to Newport RI. This could be a massive circumferential line with two branches. Starting in Worcester going to Providence with one branching to Newport and the other going to New Bedford and Fall River which are now going to be connected to Boston via south coast rail. All the infrastructure minus the Providence to Newport part is already there too. Plus there are even more abandoned lines that could easily be brought back with some TLC as the ROWs are still there.

    • @EdwardM-t8p
      @EdwardM-t8p 13 часов назад

      Yessss! Also a circumferential line from New Bedford to Newburyport via Framingham, Lowell, Lawrence and Haverhill would be very useful. The line would use existing tracks and abandoned rights of way to Lowell and possibly to Lawrence and then new alignment roughly along Route 495 to Newburyport and Salisbury where the burnt and abandoned bridge over the Merrimack would be rebuilt, affording an extension of the Newburyport Line to Portsmouth NH.

  • @stickynorth
    @stickynorth Час назад

    Make it so! The future of public transit is both electrified and automated so anything that advanced those two goals would be ideal!

  • @njtrainsandairplanes5355
    @njtrainsandairplanes5355 11 часов назад +2

    I agree with the NJ Transit expansions but the elimination of EVERY grade crossing is a bit over the top. Not every line can be elevated and not every road can have an over or underpass. While some more dangerous crossings with higher traffic volumes should be removed, it's not practical to make changes to crossings with light traffic from road or rail (I'm also a big railroad crossing nerd so I'm a bit biased)

  • @iliketrains0pwned
    @iliketrains0pwned 14 часов назад +4

    Out of curiosity, why did you choose to convert NJTransit's entire network to LIRR style 3rd rail rather than upgrading and expanding the current network of overhead wires? Wouldn't that be significantly cheaper than completely replacing NJT's fleet with M9's, and wouldn't overhead wires allow for higher capacity, higher speed trains?

    • @jointransitassociation
      @jointransitassociation  14 часов назад +3

      Easier to through run. And only the northern Hoboken Division I advocate third rail, as that would be connected to the Atlantic Branch.

    • @RocketTrain-0
      @RocketTrain-0 13 часов назад

      @@jointransitassociation Through running is reliability issue. The distances for the LIRR & NJT are long, you’d have to end services early and that will cut into capacity and cause issues with the headways.

  • @king_br0k
    @king_br0k 11 часов назад +1

    Can't wait for you to get to chicago

  • @carlinthomas9482
    @carlinthomas9482 13 часов назад +1

    This series is gold tier content. Would you consider linking a website that has a map of all the projects mentioned in the video?

  • @Squrtie
    @Squrtie 7 часов назад

    It's also worth noting that this is the _annual_ military budget. Anyone who's mad about fixating on the northeast can just wait until next year.

  • @MichaelMitchRailfan2009
    @MichaelMitchRailfan2009 16 часов назад +1

    Ok so, I like this idea Joint Transit but, if MTA/LIRR wants Oyster Bay Branch to be electrified, they'll have to remove all of its diesel trains existing and install the Overhead Wires so that DE30AC & DM30AC, this also includes the upcoming the chargers train, so that they can run on Oyster Bay Branch as electric (and also as third rail track equipment), as for the Gateway Program, I would surely like the 2 new tracks for the tunnel as Gateway only have accessible for the Amtrak trains & Semi-Fast NJT trains in and out of Penn Station (that is only bypassing Secaucus Junction station) so that the trains can have an faster way to get the passengers to their destination, but other than that, this idea seem so nice!

  • @history_leisure
    @history_leisure 11 часов назад +1

    Both branches to Dover should be electrified for all day 30min service + 2-3 Amtrak trains to Scranton and 3 NJT express round trips to Hackettstown/Easton and Andover (Amtrak and 1-2 NJT express would reach Easton/Allentown via RVL)

    • @brmnyc
      @brmnyc 9 часов назад

      I wonder if they could also manage to speed up the trains on the Morristown branch. It takes twice as long to get to Dover from Manhattan vs. taking a bus.

  • @transitcaptain
    @transitcaptain 16 часов назад +2

    I presented this morning at a model congress conference and the president said no

  • @mygins5820
    @mygins5820 16 часов назад +1

    Wow love this 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @acidmax572
    @acidmax572 12 часов назад

    Funny how I watched NE episode, top of the morning.

  • @EdwardM-t8p
    @EdwardM-t8p 12 часов назад

    This is a very good presentation! Question: is the abandoned NJT branch towards Patterson being revived under this proposal?

  • @BMTEnjoyer160
    @BMTEnjoyer160 16 часов назад +2

    WOOHOO

  • @RocketTrain-0
    @RocketTrain-0 16 часов назад +1

    I’d say a full electrification up to Riverhead. The amount for acquisition is little. As for Sunnyside station. It’s impossible to build anything on an existing rail yard. It would cut capacity into Penn Station.

    • @CraigFThompson
      @CraigFThompson Час назад

      "It's impossible to build anything on an existing rail yard."....
      NYC has done it in several locations; two of them would be the Pitkin Yard near the Queens border, and the other would be a now-defunct yard in the Bronx.

  • @EndIessProductions
    @EndIessProductions 12 часов назад

    0:20 that’s me?

  • @transitcaptain
    @transitcaptain 16 часов назад +1

    Will the major $1B track upgrade include speed increases to 100 mph? You said that it would “eliminate slow zones”

  • @nether_bat
    @nether_bat 15 часов назад +1

    What about the ETA through running proposal? It looks very promising.

    • @jointransitassociation
      @jointransitassociation  11 часов назад

      That should be in the initial budget. If not, then this amendment made it possible, as the work needed to through run trains is funded in this amendment like high floor platforms and electrification.

  • @cryorig_transit05
    @cryorig_transit05 14 часов назад +1

    LIRR heritage units, when

  • @adambuesser6264
    @adambuesser6264 11 часов назад

    What if CSX or NS board said no to MNRR or LIRR expansion on their lines?

  • @alexisdespland4939
    @alexisdespland4939 7 часов назад

    tyhe railline that gose to the englwood hospital is already being converted into light rail as the northern extension of the hudson begen line.

  • @TheJeff0569
    @TheJeff0569 11 часов назад

    Mention Cleveland please in the mid west video.

  • @alexisdespland4939
    @alexisdespland4939 7 часов назад

    nothimg about how frequent the sevicesshould be or the new amtrack service to scanton.

  • @brmnyc
    @brmnyc 9 часов назад

    I wouldn't budget a new Sunnyside station based on Secaucus Jct. That facility is a hugely overblown and inefficient design. Why must one have to travel up one set of escalators from the main line platforms to a gigantic concourse to then have to go down another, even longer escalator to get to the Bergen County platforms. It didn't occur to the designers to simply put a staircase between the two platforms???

  • @CraigFThompson
    @CraigFThompson Час назад

    Now, let's figure out what US transit could do with an already overinflated STUPERHIGHWAY budget!!

  • @daviiiid.r
    @daviiiid.r 16 часов назад +4

    love the NJT proposals. my main suggestion would be to set aside more money for existing deferred maintainance, particularly on the NEC line. the wires have been the main issue of the failures here so i think that serious money should go to fixing or replacing the wires here
    also you are funding the HBLR extension to englewood which is great, but it should go to teneck like it was originally designed to imo. or hell, make it a full northern branch reactivation and have it go all the way to nyack or meet with the West Shore line at the palisades mall

    • @waterlooandcityline
      @waterlooandcityline 15 часов назад +3

      Tenafly, not Teaneck. Tenafly residents didn't want the HBLR, which is why it was cut back to Englewood

    • @RocketTrain-0
      @RocketTrain-0 13 часов назад

      @@daviiiid.r My suggestion for the NEC is renovating Jersey Avenue and an infill station in North Brunswick for a better transfer to AMTRAK. Metropark & New Brunswick see very low ridership on AMTRAK, especially on the Northeast Regional & Keystone services. Hopefully HSR is extended into Pennsylvania up to Pittsburgh or Chicago.

    • @daviiiid.r
      @daviiiid.r 8 часов назад

      @@waterlooandcitylinemy bad, for some reason i confuse those two towns. but i can’t tell if actual residents didn’t want it or if it’s just loud nimbys because the complaints i saw when i researched the issue seemed real fake (and NJT bus ridership in the town is massive)

    • @daviiiid.r
      @daviiiid.r 8 часов назад

      @@RocketTrain-0 there’s a lot of good stuff to be done on the NEC, but i just want the existing trains to be able to run consistently before we go anywhere fancy, and i think a refresh or a replacement of the current infrastructure may be necessary to achieve that

  • @Da__goat
    @Da__goat 12 часов назад

    Somehow find a way to spend $800 bn without making any actual improvements to service, as is classic of government spending and union labor.

  • @Urban_Man
    @Urban_Man 16 часов назад +2

  • @jgoy10
    @jgoy10 11 часов назад

    🤓

  • @yelowpunk
    @yelowpunk 9 часов назад

    Without the military being funded, I'd like just one train line going across the border. Or directly into the water.