Logical Fallacies Top 6

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 июл 2024
  • Here are the Top 6 Logical Fallacies to keep in mind in group and team discussions. Knowing these will help group members with critical thinking and analytical skills. We'll look at the following fallacies:
    1. Casual fallacy
    2. Either/or fallacy
    3. Bandwagon fallacy
    4. Hasty generalization
    5. Attacking the person (ad hominin)
    Working from Beebe & Masterson's Communicating in Small Groups (Affiliate): amzn.to/2YtsUhd
    Reference: Beebe, S. A., & Masterson, J. T. (2020). Communicating in small groups: Principles and practices. (12th edition). Pearson Publishing.
    ALEX’S CLASSES AT COMMUNICATION COACH ACADEMY:
    Essential Professional Communication Skills: bit.ly/essentialcommskills
    Effective Listening Skills for Leaders: bit.ly/listeningskillsforleaders
    Become More Clear, Concise, & Confident: bit.ly/clearconciseconfident
    The Art of Persuasive Communication for Beginners: bit.ly/persuasionforbeginners
    Developing Stakeholder Relationships for Effective Team Leadership: bit.ly/stakeholderrelationships
    Present Like a Pro (Intermediate Public Speaking): bit.ly/2zmDM2W
    ALEX’S CLASSES AT SKILLSHARE (Affiliate):
    How to Have a Conversation with Anyone: skl.sh/2PVYDkl
    Effective Listening Skills for Leaders: skl.sh/2GnIRMR
    Public Speaking: How to Open and Close Like a Boss: skl.sh/2ykPJX3
    Public Speaking: Confident Delivery Skills: skl.sh/38usFFe
    Become More Clear, Concise, & Confident: skl.sh/36m6dxO
    The Art of Persuasive Communication for Beginners: skl.sh/2RNY4wt
    Developing Stakeholder Relationships for Effective Team Leadership: skl.sh/2XapBuL
    Courageous Communication Strategies for Leaders: skl.sh/3di1vEX
    The Organizational Communication Channel provides supplemental lessons for traditional, hybrid, and 100% online courses for students and teachers everywhere.
    Feel free to subscribe.

Комментарии • 14

  • @youcantalkyourwaytohealthi8884
    @youcantalkyourwaytohealthi8884 3 года назад +2

    All are commonly seen in group discussion but I love the response I’m not following can you explain the connection. I like how that helps bring relevance to a potentially irrelevant statement. 👌🏽

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  3 года назад +2

      Hi, Ruth. Agreed. I think by *_owning_* it and saying, "I'm not following," it creates room for more conversation and exploration rather than confrontation.

  • @alcogito8287
    @alcogito8287 2 года назад

    One of the most useful classes I ever took (including at university) was a semester of Logic in 9th grade. This included Logical Fallacies, and we were required to find real life examples of them. The most fertile field for finding logical fallacies, of course, was in the area of politics. It's easy. Just turn on TV and listen to the politicians answer ( or mainly not answer) the interviewers.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  2 года назад

      Very true! These fallacies are used everyday.

  • @MrSiloterio
    @MrSiloterio 2 года назад +1

    Great video professor! I would also like to know more about non-sequiturs. Can Ad Hominem and Red Herrings be an example of non-sequiturs? Thanks a lot!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  2 года назад

      Good question. There are lots of logical fallacies. A _non sequitur_ is when the conclusion/argument is not connected to the evidence. In other words, it's a different type of logical fallacy than the ones you mentioned.

  • @orgcomm
    @orgcomm  3 года назад

    Question: Which of these 6 stand out to you?
    & get a FREE pdf download for the 5 Essential Communication Skills for Professionals: www.communicationskillscoach.com/free-quick-guide-to-communication-skills.html

  • @TammyTangoToes
    @TammyTangoToes 2 года назад

    Red herring is a training tool for hunting dogs in Britain.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  2 года назад

      Hi, Tammy. From my understanding, there are old stories about using fish like that to train hunting dogs but I think it's more of a myth from the mid-1800s (and even earlier) than it is a reality. I'm not a hunting dog expert, but from what I can tell based upon very limited research, it's not a technique used today by anybody and perhaps never was. Still, despite its blurry origins, the expression caught on to mean an off-topic distraction.

    • @TammyTangoToes
      @TammyTangoToes 2 года назад

      @@orgcomm oh my gosh, wouldn't it be funny if it was somehow a fallacy. Lol. When I taught a workshop in Britain, they were so surprised that I knew the origin story of the term. Yet, it may just be a British urban myth. BTW I'm in a course right now using this textbook and your instruction has been worth gold.

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  2 года назад

      Well, it's nice to meet you online, Tammy. I'm glad the videos are helpful.

  • @hassn7750
    @hassn7750 3 года назад

    hi

  • @basharyassin7091
    @basharyassin7091 2 года назад

    Wait a minute,, you eat pizza with a fork?!!!!!

    • @orgcomm
      @orgcomm  2 года назад +1

      Huh? No way. Ha. That wasn't about me. I saw somebody say that about a politician who was running for office. For the record, I eat pizza the traditional way and I will sometimes put a partial fold in large pieces so it doesn't flop down. I can see how the Patriots example, which was about me, made it sound like maybe the next example was also about me but those are two different examples.