I've seen many of your videos, your pronunciation of Mandarin Chinese, Korean, and Japanese is spot on. It's like you're fluent in all 3 languages, that's highly impressive. I am half Chinese, half Korean myself, and I enjoy all of your content and videos, it's highly fun and educational. Chinese, Korean, and Japanese should be all brothers and sisters with love & respect. As a matter of fact I consider all Asians to be my brothers & sisters including Vietnamese, Cambodian, Thai, Hmong, Laos, Filipino, etc. All Asians, east Asians and southeast Asians come together with love & unity (that's the goal, that's the endgame)
Me too, I find the accent of the narrator extremely intriguing, especially because his pronunciation of Mandarin Chinese, Korean, and Japanese is so accurate. Interestingly, he "mispronounces" English words occasionally.
I am like you of mixed east Asian parents Years ago I had dated Chinese, Korean, and Japanese women and I enjoy and had fun with all of them. They all treated me as one of their own family members. I hate to see on youtube or other sociall media why japanese hate Chinese, or Koreans videos or Asian women dont date Asian men,Etc. What a smear champaign against us east asians and its mostly a myth majority of the time.
I am Chinese. Mostly agree. Chinese, Korean and Japanese all look like the same from appearance (Westerners usually can't tell those 3 kinds of people)! Our DNAs may be very close.
So glad I came across your channel a few months ago. I love all history but it's harder to find stuff about the eastern world since the west focuses more on Rome etc. I love the Three Kingdoms era the most. It's just so fascinating.
spring autumn period then warring period are much interesting to know and read. Well, thinkers (hundreds schools of thought) were born during that time, then strategies / ideologies were applied for the wars!
It is true that during the Kofun period Chinese and Korean culture spread to Japan through the arrival of immigrants. There is a Korean company from Baekje founded by Kim Myeong Lee named Go Tzun who collaborated with the famous architect from Shicuan, namely Wang Jingzhong, to build a temple and Buddha statue in Nara. Wang Jinzhong was a famous architect from China during the Tang Dynasty with his expertise in bringing Tang characteristics to the design. and the building style in Nara. In the 8th century AD, the famous Tang Dynasty monk named Jianzhen went to Japan from Beijing via Liaoning and the Korean Peninsula. Jianzhen also introduced the chinesse character and traditions and procedures for drinking tea in Japan
This IS very cool history Bros. I'm currently working on a book, regarding the Korean War. However, currently I'm researching the prehistory of the 3 kingdoms. Them moving to the 1800s, and 'gunboat' politics. Thanks soooooo much.
Goguryeo is a local regime established by the northern Chinese. And Baiji, Silla, Goryeo (It is ancient Chinese territory and jurisdiction). The founder and the royal noble members of the royal family are Chinese. They are wearing Han officials' clothing and using Chinese characters. Civilians and slaves are indigenous Koreans at the southern end of the peninsula. In ancient , Koreans were called "white clothes nation". Their traditional clothes were pure white and no patterns (because no dyes and dyeing technology), and adult women's clothing exposed nipples (the Korean think of being glorious and beautiful). Korean women have always used their heads to move anything (like African indigenous people). The ancient Koreans have always insisted on wearing white clothes (Even the Chinese ruler on the peninsula prohibits them from wearing white clothes. Provide them with dyeing technology). But Koreans think that they insist on wearing white clothes and adult women to show their nipples. It is the most obvious traditional Korean culture in their national costumes. This can clearly determine the identity of the Chinese and Koreans. Contrary to the traditional culture of Korean people. When the traditional Chinese culture represents the funeral ceremony of the family, it will only wear pure white clothes without patterns. Pure white clothes without patterns in ancient China were taboos. Representing family members of the family died.
1910. Japan has swallowed South Korea. The Japanese believe that some of the low -level Korean traditional culture and primitive (women expose their nipples and transport things on their heads) are very primitive and backward. The Japanese banned Korean women from exposing the nipples (the traditional Korean costume). The Korean people strongly resisted. South Koreans believe that this is a traditional culture of South Korea. They insist on retention. In the Korean capital city. As long as the Japanese see those Korean women who show their nipples, they will give them penalties and slaps. After that, the Korean capital city gradually reduces Korean women's nipples. They cover the nipples with a piece of cloth. (But in the place where there are fewer Japanese soldiers. Korean women still maintain the traditional culture that exposes nipples). Until 1950, Westerners were still taking photos in South Korea. A photo of Korean women showing nipples on the street (traditional Korean clothing). In 1970, this kind of Korean traditional culture disappeared completely.
Your English Translation is wrong. Hata Clan section: Prince from the Baekje Kingdom. Not Beijing. I asked Kyoto Buddhist monk Hata Tribe origin. The Buddhist monk said it is well documented that Hata and Aya clan origin are Korean Kingdom Baekje aka the Kudara Kingdom. The clan origin has nothing to do with China.
Nothing to do with china? Hanbok clothing is a variation of hanfu(same goes for Japan), Korean characters are also a variation of Chinese characters, using chopsticks to eat is also from china. Eating, writing, clothing, even DNA samples says they are from china. Dafug do you know.
Well, there isn't much info about the "Baiyue" (Hundred Yues). The definition also shifts through time too. So I guess I can talk about what little is known and how perception change over time.
@@CoolHistoryBros Sure, you can mention that, as well as the Nanyue. If possible, you can also mention the Nanman (southern barbarians) who lived in what is now southern China until they became Sinicised.
Can you do a video comparing Tang dynasty Armor/military with Japanese military/armor of the same period? I always find them to share alot of similarities.
@@jonaspete We do not import weapons. Iron was mined in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula and processed in Japan to make weapons. The culture of tea and cooking was introduced from the Tang Dynasty. Kanji and Buddhism are not cultures that were introduced from China, but were brought with them when the Japanese came to Japan, so they are not part of Chinese culture.
there are also several clans of craftsmen from korea and china e.g. pottery , even buddhist monks and or scholars who have settled in Japan and set up families of their own.
MA in this period finally paying off.. Really nothing to add except that the Hata are probably from Silla (Korea) or one of the bordering nations. We know this mostly from where they began to settle and a few of the traditions they brought with them. They ended up being big movers and shakers in the religious sphere so a lot of “traditional” Japanese deities are probably from mainland shamanism… which is ironic considering how these same deities were painted as so authentically Japanese during the WWII era. I don’t have the exact dates on me, but there was also a period in early Heian where about a third of the court itself was made up of foreign clans which is sort of mind-boggling. Of course, lines eventually blurred and cultures mixed. Even so, it is a testament to just how much immigration was happening and really never completely stopped until much later in Japanese history.
One bit about the Horse Rider Theory is that if the sudden appearance of horse artifacts indicates an invader, we actually have an example for that: the Philippines.
@Kalobeast 55 No academic theories I'm aware of because this isn' exactly a novel theory, ie, that there were very, very, very few horses or even horse-related artifacts from before Spanish colonization, ie horses and horse toys bought from Chinese merchants are even rarer then than people buying cars with a prancing horse on the hood from Italians today. Not that the Spanish rode around the country conquering it, they went around in boats and their authority crept inland (unlike how US cavalry made it to the mountains in Central Luzon island, which is how a suburban vacation town was developed there for the US and Philippine governments), but King Philip lived up to his name* as he maintained a stable of fine horses (contrary to what one may think if thinking of 14th C Frenchmen, no, these are not warhorses; they're trotting, pretty-maned show horses, which in dog terms is like comparing a USMC bomb dog to a poodle). *Philos (love) + hippos (horses) >> Philippos (ie Philip; Macedon or Spain, up to you) >> Philippines
Comments by [insert Asian nationalist group] who ignore everything past 7:00 be like: "Japanese are Korean, Koreans are Chinese, and Chinese are Mongolians!"
12v tbfx. You're wrong. The Mongols did not exist 2000 years ago, there are different steppe people that had inhabited that area over time. The Song dynasty was actually an ally of the Mongol against the Jurchen Jin dynasty. You can actually partially credit/blame Song for the rise of the Mongols.
帰化人, The definition that you present in your might had been accurate in the past but in current Japanese means: 自分から願い出て、自国の国籍を捨て、他国の国籍を得て、他国民となること。 「―人」 2. 渡来した動植物が、その土地になじんで、自生・繁殖するようになること。 Which that's why when this term is translated into English is the term naturalization is the most accepted term. To be annoyingly accurate when got my Japanese citizenship I do not remember any document with the term 「願い書」 but the terminology used is 申請する which means: （国や公共団体の機関に）許可・認可等を求めること。 And is usually translated as submitting an application. Really interesting video by the way.
What makes me skeptical is the fact that the dual-origin model was maintained for decades, yet this study wants us to believe that a whopping 60-70% of Japanese genome is closer to Yellow River DNA than to Yayoi DNA, and that the Japanese still somehow kept their distinct language.
We've actually known for ages that there was a third migration to Japan based on archaeological evidence but there were no viable Kofun samples to perform a genetic analysis on until recently. The modern Japanese actually do show a strong affinity to ancient Amur River AND Yellow River samples. If the Yayoi are an Amur River people then it is logical to conclude that the Kofun are a Yellow River people. I do think 71% is too high of an estimate, but one of the researchers who worked on the study did mention that a lower estimate is 40%. It is possible that the Japonic languages were of Jomon period origin rather than Yayoi since the Jomon people were actually a lot more genetically heterogenous than previously assumed but genetics and linguistics don't always go hand-in-hand. A large introgression of Han-related ancestry into a population but not changing the language wouldn't be new because the same thing happened in Vietnam. Heck, the Vietnamese were genetically overwhelmed by Taic speakers to the point where they are now closer related Dai people than the Khmer or Mlabri yet they continue to speak an Austroasiatic language today.
@@haruzanfuucha There's no such thing as ethnic Vietnamese though hence Vietnamese are ethnic Lao people admixed with mostly ethnic Di-Qiang people (O3 origin). O1 and O2 belong to ethnic Lao peoples the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world whereas the Di-Qiang people are actually ethnic minority of China. The Liangzhu culture was extremely influential and its sphere of influence reached as far north as Shanxi and as far south as Guangdong. The primary Liangzhu site was perhaps among the oldest Neolithic sites in East Asia that would be considered a state society. The type site at Liangzhu was discovered in Yuhang County, Zhejiang and initially excavated by Shi Xingeng in 1936. A 2007 analysis of the DNA recovered from human remains shows high frequencies of Haplogroup O1 in Liangzhu culture linking this culture to modern Austronesian and Tai-Kadai populations. We identified Mogou to be the earliest ~4000 yr. BP Di-Qiang population, and genetically related to Taojiazhai in sharing up to 100% paternal (O3a) and ~60% maternal (D4, M10, F, Z) haplogroups. Among the alternative models considered, simulations demonstrated that Mogou and Hengbei once contributed genes into the early Northern Han. Thus, Mogou is also similar with the Northern Han in sharing up to ~33% paternal (O3a) and ~70% maternal (D, A, F, M10) haplogroups. laos are the ancestral homeland of east asia, mainland southeast asia and island southeast asia according to multiple sources around the world. Lao Sichuan or Lao Sze Sichuan, Sichuanese, Nanping Lao people, Lao Yunnan, Lao Shanghai/Shanghainese, Lao Beijing/Beijingese, Mulao, Gelao, Gelong, Bouyei, Li, Hlai, Zhuang, Rau, Daic, Dai, Tai, Thai, Kradai, Tai-Kadai, Yue, Baiyue, Yayoi people, are ethnic Lao peoples formerly Ai Lao peoples also spelled Liao peoples the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world originated from Altai mountain, Mongolia over thousands of years ago. China, Hainan Island, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Japan, Northeastern India, Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines and Hawaii, are actually founded by ethnic Lao peoples. DNA research has shown that Sichuanese people are closely genetically related to the Daic (Dai Chinese). Most of central Sichuan was inhabited by the Dai people who formed the serfs class, accounting for the vast majority of the population. Han Chinese in Zhejiang and Shanghai have the highest concentration of Kra-Dai types of Y haplotypes among all the Han populations in China, suggesting a possible expansion of Kra-Dai peoples from southern China to Zhejiang via Jiangxi. Hubei Han show significant evidence of genetic admixture deriving about 63% of ancestry from Tai-Kadai or Austronesian-speaking southern indigenous groups and 37% from Tungusic or Mongolic related northern populations. Conclusions: The formation of Han Chinese has involved extensive admixture with Tai-Kadai or Austronesian-speaking populations in the south and Tungusic or Mongolic speaking populations in the north. Taiwanese people are 80% southern Han Chinese (sharing ancestors with persons in Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian, Hong Kong, Macau, and Hainan). The genetic distinction between northern and southern Han Chinese has been recognized. again, the populations from east asia were derived from the same lineage. in both phylogenies with different loci and populations, populations from east asia always derived from a single lineage, indicating the single origin of those populations.
@@haruzanfuucha There is a record that Goguryeo, Silla, Baekje, and Balhae paid tribute to Japan (the Yamato court). The power relations at that time were also Sui-Tang Dynasty (Mongolia) >>> Yamato > Goguryeo >>> Silla > Baekje It is possible that the northern Han people came to Japan via the Korean peninsula, perhaps due to the Mongol invasion.
@@山田次郎-e8i Sui and Tang weren't Mongol, the steppe nomad have only really won against China 2 times in history, the Mongol during Genghis Khan and the Manchu in late Ming dynasty, every other time it is the Chinese that kick the nomad @ss.
Well, the next. video will be about the predynastic. mythical rulers of China. Then I will do a few videos explaining Confucianism and end the year with lighter topics like Avatar, and the history of Wuxia and Ninja fiction.
@@CoolHistoryBros >few videos explaining Confucianism Thanks god you are doing this. Recently Confucianism has been getting a lot of misinformed shit just because it's from China. Those people emphasize stuff like 夫爲婦綱, 父爲子綱, 夫婦有別 and distort alot of their meaning to fit it into western perception of "savage" culture mold.
@@CoolHistoryBros Another great topic following your explanation of Confucianism would be on *whether Confucianism is a religion,* but I guess "what is a religion?" is also another big topic in itself because there are different definitions and ways of classification.
I cannot believe that Cool History Bros did not participate in the Project: Imperial China! Also, will you do a video about those cultivation novels/manhua eventually?
@@CoolHistoryBros Well, I merely wanted to know your thought about why the protagonists in these stories have to be a bunch of arrogant punks with no manners. That's all. Heck, some of them even... well... did things to the women in their harems without their consents. If you've read Against The Gods and have read the part when Yun Che was alone with Chu Yuanchan, who was dying because of poison in her system at the time, you will know what I mean.
I think this is one of those things classified as "self-pleasure" web-novels. To be honest, a lot of those new cultivation novels are part of the Japanese Isekai Web novel culture. It became popular in Taiwan after Japan and the Mainland followed suit. I will talk about this in my history of wuxia fiction video.
@@CoolHistoryBros Chinese cultivation novels began in the Han Dynasty, and after Taoism became religious, they merged with local myths to form the cultivation culture.
Thank you for a interesting video! Personally, I think that rather than a direct mixture of the stable zone- Chinese, Japanese, Korean - the archaeological evidence suggests a buffer zone in the middle, with genetic influences from each side. im studying ancient east asian history from language, and archaeological things. an interesting fact is that the southern part of the Korean peninsula was partly a Jomon cultural area, so the "Yayoi" type people probably progress there already mixed, and expand from the Kitakyushu - southern Korean cultural area over a period of several thousand years. in addition, some basic vocabulary such as place names are common to ancient Japanese, and in later era the Japanese style of Kofun also exists in the Korean peninsula, so maybe theres still no strict border of activity between korean race and japanese race in kofun era. i think thats why "new" kofun people in the video is more connected to the chinese. Research into the language of the Kofun period suggests that the Okinawan language differentiated itself from the Japanese language during the Kofun period. It would be interesting to see more research from different perspectives, as in the past it has been common to force the relationship between conqueror and conquered, or to seek the origins of the native peoples through political ideology.
@@FF-ky3mp O-M122 belong to ethnic Di-Qiang people they're the ancestors of the northern Han Chinese from the central plains region they speak Sinto-Tibetan language admixed with Tibeto-Burman, Mongolian, northern related people, Tai-Kadai people. O1a and O2a belong to Tai-Kadai peoples ethnic Lao peoples the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world originated from Altai mountain, Mongolia over thousands of years ago they were the original founders of the ancient China formerly known as Qin, Qin is a Lao name surname given for China and Chinese people pronounced Gin or Jin to these days Lao people they still called China and Chinese people Jin and modern China, China is a Lao name surname pronounced Chee-Na not Child-Na they also founded Hainan island, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Japan, Northeast India, Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, and Hawaii there are also millions of ethnic Lao people living in Eastern part of central Asia countries particularly in Uzbekistan they came from Southern China during a Tang dynasty their main Y-chromosome belong to O1b. The video are very misleading he should have said the Chinese samples that they compared to the Japanese samples were from Beijing Han, Beijing Han are ethnic Lao people their main Y-chromosome belong O1a not O3 they do mixed with northern Han from central plains region though but they're not ethnic Di-Qiang people they also speak different language from the yellow River basin people people (Sino-Tibetan speaking people). Yayoi main Y-chromosome belong to O1a and O2b not O3 they're the majority of the Japanese population not minority. Yayoi people and Kofun people are ethnic Lao people not ethnic Di-Qiang people. Japanese populations are mostly ethnic Lao people the rest are Yellow River basin people (ethnic Di-Qiang people), Jomon, Ainu, northern related people... Lao Sichuan/Sichuanese, NanPing Lao, Lao Yunnan/Yunnan Han, Lao Shanghai/Shanghainese, Lao Beijing/Beijing Han, Jining Han, Mulao, Gelao, Rau, Zhuang, Yue/Baiyue, Daic, Dai, Tai, Thai, Kradai, Tai-Kadai peoples are ethnic Lao peoples. Laos are the ancestral homeland of East Asian, MSEA, and ISEA peoples according to 23 and Me, and many Universities around the world.
@@FF-ky3mp The video didn't mention about haplogroup, it's not detailed enough. Chinese and Japanese are vastly different in term of Y-haplogroup distribution. Yayoi were O-M176 + O-M122, and modern Japanese are mostly D1b + O-M176 + O-M122 -- but Han people are mostly O-M122, and O-M176 is almost absent from them. On a note, O-M122 is pretty prevalent across Asia, it's not unique to Han people. Although Japanese and Northern Chinese have similar mtDNA, and I think that's where the similarities mostly came from.
The Chinese in the north are diverse. Shandong is not rich, but it is the highest in the whole East Asia. If you exclude some mixed blood, the average height can be compared with northern Europe!
You're a good sport for even entertaining the "lost tribe of Israel" theory, but you gave it about as much attention as it deserved I think 🤣 quick mention 'probably not true,' moving on! Edit: somehow I didn't expect this to turn into the history channel forum but Silly Me I guess! 🤣
Not just that, but the hexagram was not a symbol of judaism at the time of this migration. And by goodness sake the lost tribes of israel were lost a looooong time ago before these migrations, furthermore we can't conspire anything because the tribes were not literally lost, they ceased to exist and the members integrated into other local cultures within Mesopotamia.
@@jonathanwilliams1065 There's absolutely no evidence to even assume this was a migration from Palestine, the name of the territory as the actual ancient Israelites called it.
@@order_truth_involvement6135 first off the ancient Israelites called the land Israel or Canaan, with the southern part being known as Judah, and in later years most of it became known as Judea The Name “Palestine” didnt exist until AD 135, when the Romans renamed Judea after the Jews ancient enemies, the philistines
Nah, I don't think there's any need to fear the comment section, since these days the nationalism has largely died down in both Korea and Japan, so at least, talking about the possible links between the two in ancient times need not be volatile. Personally, I think it's undeniable there were certain waves of migration, but at the same time I don't think the self-proclaimed lineages are actually based on any real historical event. I think it's a product of just a common trend in antiquity of all cultures to claim their ancestry as that of exotic and prestigious outsiders. Like how the Romans claimed they came from Aeneas of Troy, the Kingdom of Goryeo claimed their ancestry traces back to the Tang imperial family, and the Merovingians claimed they were of Jesus's bloodline.
It is very clear that since the Kofun period the entire societal template in Japan until the restoration period is the steppe culture template. From the class system, honour, clan/khan structure, war style, horse culture, martial arts, religion … 🤷♂️
Thanks for covering this topic! I was doing my own research and found out this too. Apparently it wasn't a well know topic, at least in the English speaking realm.
I'm an Australian of mixed Chinese and European ancestry. I've known that ancient Chinese migrated to Japan for at least 40 years. I'd heard somewhere that a large % of Japanese people are descended from Chinese. Of course it makes sense that Korean people would also have migrated to and traded with Japanese and Chinese people. That area is in many ways similar in geopolitical and trading histories as Britain with Denmark, the Netherlands etc. A constant flow back and forth of political, religious, cultural, technological ideas, goods, DNA, etc.
Look at the origin of the Japanese word for 'horse'. Horses were introduced from Mainland Asia. UMA うま is the apparent 'native Japanese word' for "horse"馬. (The later Chinese borrowing for the Kanji was BA バ). Nasalised inital 'u' う then 'ma' ま- (possible ancient Chinese somewhere pronounced like "MMBA")?
When Netflix was casting extras for their TV show "Marco Polo" in Malaysia and it had Kublai Khan in it, i was casted as a Tang Dynasty person even though I was a rather dark skinned Chinese person. Got me thinking about genetic admixture.. About Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Mongolians, South East Asians, its all over the place...
The new study regarding to Kofun population is very misleading as the researchers only had a very few samples. It was only 3 individuals from the Kofun period and it was all from the same burial site. It stated: There are caveats to this analysis. First, we are limited to only two Late Yayoi individuals from a region where skeletal remains associated with Yayoi culture are morphologically similar to Jomon (16). Yayoi individuals from other regions or other time points may have different ancestral profiles, e.g., continental-like or Kofun-like ancestry. Second, our sampling is nonrandom, as is the case of our three Kofun individuals coming from the same burial site (table S1). Additional ancient genomic data will be necessary to trace temporal and regional variation in the genetic ancestry of Yayoi and Kofun populations and provide a comprehensive view of the tripartite structure of Japanese populations proposed here.
I took a History of Asian Civ course in college a few years ago, and the professor taught us the Horse Rider Thesis without ever mentioning that it was controversial. I was so mad when I googled it for more information and found out how far from settled it was. Not nearly as mad as I was when that same professor taught us that the Altaic Language Family was real, though...
welcome to the world of post-uni. Honestly even if they were migrants from the yellow river region, or southern korea; if they could afford the journey chances are they brought horses. There is this black and white attitude towards horses in east asian history, not everyone south of mongolia with a horse was some cashed up noble on a chariot.
@@anasevi9456 One interesting aspect (which is rarely mentioned) is the lack of composite bows in ancient Japan whereas your typical horse rider is almost unthinkable without it... instead Japanese archers were using those clumsy longbows...
@@anasevi9456 The issue with the Horse Rider Thesis isn't really whether or not there were people bringing horses to Japan, it's more an issue of whether they came gradually or in one big migration - the Horse Rider Thesis proposes the latter, while the former is more firmly supported by most evidence.
@@SomasAcademy However, it is interesting to note that the Horserider theory can attest to the large migration of "Northern Han" peoples in this time period, as it corresponds to the conquest of the Chinese Commanderies of Xuantu, Daifang, and Lelang by Goguryeo, Formation of the "Three Kingdoms of Korea", reigns of Ojin and Jingu, and the start of Baekje's ties with Japan. It also occurs during the Sixteen Kingdoms period as well. Interestingly, Geunchogo of Baekje was called General Stabilizing the East and the Administrator-General of Lelang, possibly indicating some kind of continuity or relationship with Lelang.
I don't understand these graphs 7:29. The left one says Koreans are closer to Japanese, the right, Chinese (east asia) are. Usually former is believed, you make it sound like the latter is the case.
The Vietnamese received so much genetic impact from the Han Chinese over the course of 2000 years (with half of that being spent as a literal part of China), the Vietnamese hardly phenotypically or culturally resemble their Hoabinhian ancestors at all. They are the Southeast Asian ethnic group with by far the most Northeast Asian ancestry, but the Vietnamese continue to speak an Austroasiatic language which is very Southeast Asian. Out of all the extant language families in Southeast Asia, Austroasiatic has had a presence in the SEA region for the longest.
The vietnamese language prior to western invasion, the kings read and write in chinese. This can be verified in the vietnamese museum of history hochi minh city and many other vietnamese cities. When the french invaded vietnam, they change their language because they didnt like the native language and that they couldnt read it. The vietnamese language today is based on the french language.
There are two types of Vietnamese, one is native and the other is from China. Vietnamese originally are from China, they migrated from China at least 5,000 years ago. The native type consists of aboriginal tribes. The Latin name Vietnam is derived from Yue Nam, an English transliteration from a Chinese name. Originally Yue Nam was Nam Yue, it was started by the Chinese Yue about 2,000 years ago. The Chinese Yue mixed with the aboriginal natives and they became Bai Yue, meaning hundred Yue tribes.
@@dearcoolz ethnicity [ eth-nis-i-tee ] noun, plural eth·nic·i·ties. An ethnic group or ethnicity is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups such as a common set of traditions, ancestry, language, history, society, culture, nation, religion, or social treatment within their residing area.
the modern clan is not so much(because its more related to fujiwara/heike clan), but in heian era, the influence on the X chromosome seems to have been greater because of the mother of Emperor Kammu. nevertheless, this is not directly related to the Baekje Royal House because arrival in Japan 200 years ago. Other tribes before kanmu have been related to the Emperors after several generations of mixing with the Japanese, so it depends on how far you define "related".
Due to studies of Ydna of male members of the Japanese imperial family, they were not from Korea but most likely a paternal lineage of the native Jomon people.
@@capmidnite : He has been going through history channels and making ridiculous claims, most of his sources are from Chinese websites or western sources that has a fetish for their woman.
@@capmidnite It’s not wild assertion, it’s quite the common knowledge amongst the genetics community for a long time now, you just never heard about it because you don’t look for it, haplogroup D is the ydna of the Japanese imperial family, the same ydna of the native Jomon people and many Japanese clans that are branches from the imperial family.
@@hwasiaqhan8923 i respect to your research, but the uniform DNA-level categorisation of "Jomon" is highly arbitrary and hardly objective. It is more limited in scope than categorisations such as "Yayoi" or "Ancient Korean", but that is all. Even the Yayoi are descendants of the Jomon, given their nearly 20,000 years of history, advanced navigational skills and wide distribution, and the Kofun are "descendants of the Jomon with Chinese genes". It is true that the Y chromosome goes back to the Jomon, but the X chromosome and mitochondrial chromosomes must also be considered together to determine our "genetic heritage".
Interesting observation about horse figurines in the kofuns. Western Han Chinese were able to fight the nomad Huns who lived in what is modern day Mongolia and Xinjiang because they imported better quality horses from Central Asia during (Han) Wu Emperor's reign. Giant imperial tombs have been a tradition in China since Qin Dynasty. You probably have heard of or seen the terracotta (clay) warriors and horses excavated from (Qin) Shihuangdi's tomb in northwestern China. Just my personal opinion, the "Horse Riders from North China" theory seems quite plausible.
Starting from days back with Yamatai-koku, until Japan closed (Sakoku) the country AC.1639 or 1641, Japan had serious interracial relationships with China and Korea who becomes their ancestors. The collapse of Korea and China dynasty also created several migrations into Japan as well.
Never gonna happen, the fact that Korean hates Han Chinese and Japanese, Chinese hates Japanese and look down on Korean and Japanese look down on both Chinese and Korean.
@@OkOk-qd2nc The southern part of the Korean Peninsula was originally ruled by the Japanese (Wajin). WW2 has little to do with it. The ancestors of Chinese and Koreans lived in the northern part of the Yellow Sea coast, but after the fall of the Han Dynasty, they moved to the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. Baekje and Silla are called kings by the Tang emperors, but Japan is called emperor.
Thats pretty cool. I wonder how these groups of people looked like before the genetic merger. Would be pretty cool to see the evolutionary change across the ages.
Probably more African and as we moved further north our skin lightened in reaction to the colder climate. Those with lighter skin absorbed more sunlight perhaps.
@jin gu I mean it would be odd if we didnt come from africa as from what I at least was lead to believe is that modern humans developed in Africa, like other human ancestors so technically any group of humans originates from there far enough back
Interesting fact: the Star of David has nothing to do with King David. There is no evidence he used any sort of star for his emblem. It’s a more esoteric symbol that got adopted and named after him.
I do think that, maybe, horesmen did invade Japan, or at least migrated there. It would be strange if they didn't. Also, their admixture with Chinese and Korean would explain why these very different linguistic groups share a lot of genetic similarities.
The horsemen conquest dynasty theory is now complete fiction. The key-shaped burial mound of the emperor, which is characteristic of Japan, continues from the 3rd century AD to the 7th century AD. This would not be possible if the horsemen were conquering. Also, it is impossible to ship a large number of horses to conquer Japan at that time.
@@shion_bluerider not really if they crossed in Hokkaido from the north when the passages are frozen. However, this might not be the case since the Ainu don't seem to incorporate horseriding as part of their culture.
@@shion_bluerider Is it? The massive influx of genetic material indicates displacement above anything else. The Japonic languages also have seemed to diverged around 1450-1700 years ago, also indicating that the Horserider theory has some merit. The Horseriders would've likely been those of Sinitic and Buyeo descent, unlike modern Koreans who are Samhan in linguistic origin.
@@Innomenatus The Chinese migration in to N.Korea displaced the original Koreans from N.Korea to migrate to S.Korea, and the japonic people(Yayoi) who were natives of S.Korea were forced to migrate to Japan and displaced the Jomon.
5:59 "帰化人" actually, literally means "return change people". Pretty good analysis in this video, but the Hata Clan's 秦氏 relation to Israel could be explored much further, because there is a lot of evidence in favor of that position.
@@earlysda That's a big question, but the focus is on whether, when and why Japanese people have conceived of themselves as a homogeneous, ethnically and culturally 'separate' race (an idea the book claims to be of surprisingly late origin) versus the idea of Japan as ethnically and culturally diverse, including various immigrant groups from Korea and China, as well as (during the time of the empire) Korea and parts of China itself. Of course, it's difficult to maintain the image of yourself as a sequestered island people and as a sprawling multi-ethnic empire at the same time - although the British gave it a good go - and it's interesting to me (especially as a Brit) to see some familiar arguments and contradictions played out in the very different context of east Asia.
I find it really interesting how we don't really know our origins if you go back far enough. It means we don't know how we got here as a society, our origins fade into the mist in the same was as an individuals history fades when they consider their childhood.
The horse invader theory is interesting in that with a few centuries, they forgot how to fight on horses. Then had to relearn it again fighting/learning from the Imishis.
Animal husbandry wasn't very common among old western and central Japanese but more of northern Japanese practice where Emishi (not Imeishi) used to live. They definitely have more Jomon connections than the rest and perhaps even part Ainu. Anyway, horses came to Japan along with riders and pastoralism from north east Asia and spread from there. Northern Japan (Tohoku region) was known for horse raising and export to other areas of Japan for a long time.
I read a few years ago on the "Genetic Heritage" of National Geographic study that the genetic difference between Japanese and Chinese is about 1%. Also, Chinese people not knowing Japanese language can read Japanese newspaper and guess what it is about. Japanese language uses primarily Chinese characters.
It’s because Japanese borrowed Hanzi (Kanji) - linguistically, Japanese are completely different from Chinese languages. Although Chinese might be able to recognise hanzi characters, they wouldn’t be able to understand most of Japanese words because the usage is quite different. As for grammar.. well, it’s totally different! Genetically, there will be some similarities, but Koreans are closer to Japanese than Chinese to Japanese.
@@jun8569 Probably, but 40% of korean men carry the same Y DNA as 70% of Chinese so for a long time the Korean thought they went to Japan but earlier than that the Koreans probably came from Chinese who migrated to Korea or maybe later during the Han-Jin colonisation of northern Korea.
@@jun8569 You CANNOT use linguistic to tell where an ethnicity originate from. Language CANNOT define a person’s or an ethnicity origin. For example people from Finland are mostly caucasian but they speak an Asian language. Another example is modern day Turkish people from Turkey is mostly european and middle east ancestry but they speak an Asian language. So in conclusion, sometimes the language CANNOT determine where the ethnicity come from tbh. Just to add on, if you want to link Japanese and Korean to Altaic, then its just plain nonsense. Cause "Altaic" is rejected by most of linguists. There is no such thing as Altaic. Altaic theory is mostly seen as discredited. (Also just to add on, the Sino- Tibetan language might be related to Dene- Yeneisian language family. So what you called the Sino-Tibetan might be closest to Yeneisian people from Siberia and also Na-dene people from the Arctic/ Alaska. Of course these is controversial as well) This recent study that Japanese derived from Jomon people, Yayoi people from Northeast Asia and Kofun people from China is published by Japanese themselves. If you want to question and bash, then you should ask the japanese that publish this recent study/ article.
@@hwasiaqhan8923 No, the Jurchens and Khitans are not Chinese. They are xiongnu/mongoloid races and cultures. Their oral language, writing, culture and traditions are not Confucian. Koreans are Turkic descended.
@@Tekhelet75 Lmao ‘Turkic’ there’s no such thing as Turkic genetically so what do you mean by Turkic descendants? Uyghur and Turkish don’t look the same obviously they are different genetically and now you’re adding the korean who look even more unrelated physically so what exactly is ‘Turkic’? And yes, korean are majorly haplogroup O which is the same with the Chinese, Turkic? They are a mix bag of R C K J I Q etc
I once saw a documentary where a professor from a Japanese University said that Japanese and Chinese DNA's are 98% identical. Well, this is not surprising at all when both countries had massive exchanges and the exchanges could have been well before the heyday of China's Tang dynasty. Exchanges must've had marriages and same with the Koreans.
Didn't you saw where it's said the Yellow River basin people (ethnic related to Di-Qiang people O3 origin), and Southern people (ethnic Lao people O1 and O2 origin) are two different ethnic groups of peoples? The Chinese samples that they compared to the Japanese samples were from Beijing Han, Beijing Han are ethnic Lao people their main Y-chromosome belong O1a not O3 they're mixed with northern Han from central plains region though they also speak different dialect from the yellow River basin people (Sino-Tibetan speaking people). Yayoi main Y-chromosome belong to O1a and O2b not O3. Japanese populations are mostly ethnic Lao people the rest are Yellow River basin people (ethnic Di-Qiang people), Jomon, Ainu, northern related people... Lao Sichuan/Sichuanese, NanPing Lao, Lao Yunnan/Yunnan Han, Lao Shanghai/Shanghainese, Lao Beijing/Beijing Han, Jining Han, Mulao, Gelao, Liao, Rau, Zhuang, Yue, Baiyue, Daic, Dai, Tai, Thai, Kradai, Tai-Kadai, are ethnic Lao peoples.
@@oneviwatara9384 Lao Beijing means Old/Native beijinger, same applies to the rest of your examples, nothing to do with Laos. You’re redefining words here. Implying your logic, Australian are from Austria because they both have Aus in their country names, or English are descendants of Indian because En is a phonetic reference to In, India. You’re fking weird. yet you just named more than half of China’s regions and said they are all genetically Laos and O1 come from Laos, yet if that’s true O1 would be the largest ydna group of China but it isn’t. Plus Laos aren’t even the largest contributor to O1, Han are.
@@hwasiaqhan8923 I got news for you there is no such thing as ethnic Han Chinese or ethnic Chinese people though but there is ethnic Lao peoples though the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world originated from Altai mountain, Mongolia over thousands of years ago they were the original founders of ancient China/modern China, they also founded Hainan island, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Japan, Northeastern India, Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, and Hawaii. Sinitic is just mean Southern Chinese peoples. East Asians people living in Eastern part of central Asia countries are mostly ethnic Lao peoples they came from Southern China during a Tang dynasty there are also millions of ethnic Lao peoples living in inner Mongolia/Mongolia some even migrated to Siberia over centuries ago.
@@oneviwatara9384 That’s false, the Han are more real than Laos or “tai-kradai ethnicity” which is a modern linguistic term for studies no one even refer to themselves as a “tai-kradai” person. Laos is also a quite modern name go back a couple hundred years and no one would’ve heard of this term.
@@oneviwatara9384 You’re sad your “Laos” people are not living the best lives today so you try to distort history based on your personal fantasies to compensate your peoples lack of impressiveness in history by saying you’re the real ‘founders’ of civilisations lmao, you remind me of those Black people who claimed they established all ancient civilisations from China to Egypt, maybe in a different universe, but not this one.
@@nikkosr888 Ainu have haplogroup D which is prevalent in Yamato, Ryukyuan, Tibeto-burman speaking populations and Andaman. Russian have haplogroup R which is closer to Europeans. Ainu and Russian are not genetically related.
If we look at Y DNA (Male DNA lineage) alone, we could already see there were Han(Sinitic) and Korean related migration to Japan, Hata Clan’s Y DNA is haplogroup O2a2b1a1 (formerly known as O3a2c1a), the most common lineage among Han Chinese, and specifically to the O-CTS10738 subclade found in both China and Japan. The Hata clan was founded by Chinese immigrants during the Kofun period (250-538). They became the ancestors of a number of samurai clans, such as the Akizuki, Chōsokabe, Kawakatsu and Tamura.
The people who came to Japan from around the 3rd century to the 7th century are genes of the O2 lineage and are northern Han people. The Yayoi people came to the Japanese archipelago from the vicinity of the Yangtze River in mainland China, and some Yayoi people went north to the Korean Peninsula. O1b2a1a2 (F2868) - Japanese Archipelago←【Parent A】 O1b2a1a2a (L682) - High frequency on the Korean Peninsula ← [Child B of parent A] O1b2a1a2a1 (CTS723) - Korean Peninsula ←【Child C of Child B】 O1b2a1a2a1a (CTS7620) - Nanai tribe in northeastern China ← [child C's child D] Current Korean Y chromosome DNA, O2, O1b2 and C. Some of the Yayoi people migrated from the Japanese archipelago to the Korean Peninsula in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula, and the ancestors of the northern Han people lived in the northern part. However, as the ancestors of the Mongolians migrated south, they fled to the southern part of the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago. The Tang Empire, which was at war with Japan, was a country ruled by the Mongols. The Sui, Tang, and Yuan empires were ruled by the Mongols. The Qing Dynasty was ruled by the Jurchen. It is not the history of the Han people.
I'm a little confused 2:10 if the Hata clan is Chinese in origin why would it's head be a prince of Baekjae? This entire video seems to some how be trying to tie Japanese ancestry to China via Korea, wth? There are plenty of proof that ties Korea and Japan but when did China become involved. Why is China attempting to stretch it's reach over all of Asia by any means necessary even if it means revising history and propagating the false idea that China is the center of all Asian history and culture.
1，Old asian=D-M174 and C-M130→Origin: Mongolia or Central Asia Phylogenetic trees D (M174)=D1 D1=D1a+D1b=D1a1+D1a2+D1b=D1a1+（D1a2a+D1a2b）+D1b D1=D1a+D1b（Philippines） D1a =D1a1+D1a2 D1a1→Mainland China, Tibet Tibetan 51.6% D1a2→D1a2a Janpanese 35-40％ D1a2b Andaman Islands 100% Phylogenetic trees C-M130=C1 +C2=C1+C2a+C2b+C2c+C2d+C2e C2a→Native American C2b→Tungusic（Mongolian+Manchu people），Kazakh，Hazara Kazakh 50.85% Mongolian 53.8％ C2c→Pan-Asian（China, Japan, Korea, Central Asia, Southeast Asia） 2，New Asian=NO-M214→Origin:Mainland China，Indochina Phylogenetic trees K2a1→NO-M214=N (M231)+O (M175) N (M231)→Siberians indigenous→Uralian languages+Yakut Nenets people 97.3% Nganasan people 92.11% Yakut people 88.4% Phylogenetic trees O-M175=O1+O2=O1a+O1b+O2a+O2b Baiyue people O1=O1a+O1b1+O1b2 ，The Liangzhu/Hemudu culture O1a→Austronesian Fujian O1a→Taiwan→Philippines→Oceania→ Austronesian，Taiwanese aborigines 89.6%O1a O1b1→Tai-Kadai→Laos O1b2→Korean O2→Sino-Tibetan=Han chinese+Tibetan The most common Y-DNA haplogroup among present-day East asian：NOCD+Q Haplogroup P1=Q (Q-M242) +R (R-M207) Origin: Central Asia Phylogenetic trees P1 =Q1+R1+R2=Q1+R1a+R1b+R2 Q1→Native American Ket people 93.7%Q Navajo 92.3%Q Genetic history of Indigenous peoples of the Americas：Q1，C-P39，R1 R1a→Scythians/Proto-Indo-Europeans In India, high frequencies of this haplogroup is observed in West Bengal Brahmins (72%) to the east, Gujarat Lohanas (60%) to the west Pashtun，Iranian，Tajik→R1a R1b→Western Europe R2 has been concentrated geographically in South Asia Egypt, North Africa→E/G indian→L/H Jews and Arabs→J Semitic people→J-M304=J1+J2，It is believed to have evolved in Western Asia. J1 is in modern times most frequent in the Arabian Peninsula: Yemen (up to 76%),Saudi (up to 64%) (Alshamali 2009), Qatar (58%),and Dagestan (up to 56%) J2 is found in the highest concentrations in the Caucasus and the Fertile Crescent/Iraq The highest ever reported concentration of J2 was 72% in Northeastern Georgia (Nasidze 2004).
Central Asian: Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmen Mongolian, Manchu people Yakut, Tajik, Yeniseian people 1, Turkey Anatolian Turks= 1, R1b (15.9%), R1a (6.9%) J (33%), E (10.7%), G (10.9%), L (4.2%) 2. C2 (1.3), N (3.8%), Q (1.9%) The main sources of Turkish descent are Middle Eastern J and European R1b, not Turkic people/Xiongnu→7%CNQ 2. Kazakhstan 1, C2 (50.85%), O2 (10.82%), N (5.33%), Q (3.17%), D (0.46%) 2. R (12.13%), J (8.19%), G (4.95%), E (1.78%) Mongoloid / East Asian→70.63%NOCDQ 3. Kyrgyzstan 1, C2 (19.7%), O2 (6.1%), N (4.5%), Q (0.76%) 2, R(59.1%), J(5.3%), E(0.76%), H(0.76%) Mongoloid / East Asian→31.06%NOCQ 4. Tajik 45% R1a, 8% R2, 18% J, 8% C Tajiks are not Turkic In South Asia, R1a1a has often been observed West Bengal Brahmins (India)→72.22%R1a Uttar Pradesh Brahmin (India)→67.74%R1a Bihar Brahmins (India)→60.53%R1a Sindhi (Pakistan)→52.4%R1a Zerjal et al. (2002) found R1a1a in 64% of a sample of the Tajiks of Tajikistan Di Cristofaro et al. (2013) found R1a1a-M198/M17 in 56.3% (49/87) of a pair of samples of Pashtuns from Afghanistan 5. Uzbekistan 1, C2 (11.5%), O2 (4.1%), N (1.4%) 2, R1a(25.1%), R1b(9.8%), J(13.4) Mongoloid / East Asian→17%NOC 6, Turkmen Q Haplogroup Q-M242→Native American Haplogroup Q1→Xiongnu, Lake Baikal Yeniseian people/Kets(central Siberia） 93.7%Q In Siberia, the regions between Altai and Lake Baikal, which are famous for many prehistoric cultures and as the most likely birthplace of haplogroup Q Navajo 92.3%，North American Eskimo (Inuit)-Aleut populations 80% Chelkans 60%，Tubalar 40%-North Asia 7, Yakuts A genetic analysis of human bone remains dating back to 6500 to 2700 BC. in the Liao area, Haplogroup N (Y-DNA) (frequently in Uralic peoples and Yakuts) was observed at 60-100% Yakuts 88.4%N1 8, Mongolian 1, C2(53.8%), O2(10.8%), N(10.8%) 2, R1a( 9.2%), J(3.1%)
This recent study and article is published by westerners and Japanese themselves. Please ask the Japanese who published this recent article. There are Japanese sources and links to it. Based on the latest study conducted by japanese themselves, japanese are mostly descendents of kofun people. (although they are mix of jomon, yayoi and kofun people technically). The main roots of modern Japanese people are from 3 different lineages: 1) The Jōmon period hunter-gatherers and fishers. (The modern Ainu are neither a representative of the ancient Jōmon, nor their direct descendants. Jōmon are best represented by the modern Himalayan Kusunda people. 2) The Yayoi period migrants from Northeast Asia from Liao River or Amur Region (Northeast china/ Korea) 3) The Kofun period migrants from China ( Han Chinese/ Sinitic people) These 3 population mixed to form modern day yamato japanese. The genetic input to modern day japanese from Jomon, Yayoi and Kofun people is 13% , 16% and 71% respectively. Sources/ Link at the bottom ( articles can be found in japanese as well as english) www.asahi.com/articles/ASP9K55ZJP9JULBJ00Z.html www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/japanese-ancestors-came-from-three-ancient-groups-180978725/ www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/study-rewrites-understanding-modern-japans-genetic-ancestry-2021-09-17/ If these was published by Japanese themselves, then its probably the truth. I mean why would the Japanese lie about their origin? You can search it up on google or click on the link that i gave you. There is japanese and english sources to back this up.
Cool History Bros, can you cover the major battles in ancient China, those not covered by the other RUclips Channels? Those usually covered are those during the Three Kingdoms period.
Interestinly the kofun period corresponds to a period of chaos and barbarian invasion of china Kawagoe wrote: The Han empire collapsed in AD 220. China became politically divided, with many short-lived kingdoms arising in different regions of the continent. And upon the fall of the Chin dynasty, the invasions of nomadic tribes from the north resulted in political dislocation of many clans and ethnic groups. This triggered the outflow of displaced migrants into Korea and very likely at some point, Japan, bringing with them Chinese techniques and knowledge. [Source: Aileen Kawagoe, Heritage of Japan]
It's always interesting how Genetic Studies and Archaeology always create more questions about our past. I also find it interesting and a bit disturbing that the records from the 800's and 700 's Bce does not mention The Ainu at all. This could indicate that the part of Japan in question was occupied by migrants from the Continent and other Islands nearby and the Ainu were either displaced or absorbed into the ' Official ' Japanese Culture and people before 850 bce. Considering the region of Japan that the Ainu inhabit today and the fact that fishing in a part of Ainu Culture even today, I find it unlikely that the Ainu were not present in the parts of Japan mentioned in this video. If Ainu artifacts have been discovered in the parts of Japan featured in the video. Could they have listed under the catergory of ' Those who submitted '. and not called Ainu at the time ?. That does lend some credence to the theory of invaders riding horses especialy if there are no remains of horses found prior to that period in Japan. Could the Ainu be a victim of colonization that occured in in Japan as early as 900 bce ?. I think it would be ' Cool ' if someone discovered a diffinitive answer to that question. It might even get them the admiration of the Ainu people and that wouldn't be a bad thing to have.
nowday "Ainu" are a group of people who have retained their Jomon culture (with some effect of Yayoi and Kofun culture and language), but who were inspired by the Okhotsk culture. Thinking the "Ainu" before the Kofun period same as modern Ainu is itself a little outdated. It is also a decades-old hypothesis that the Yayoi occupied Japan, displacing the Jomon, and that the Jomon who were driven to Okinawa and Hokkaido became the Ainu/Okinawans.
@@権兵衛-e8u The first European to study the Ainu was Josef Piłsudski's brother Bronisław Piłsudski who married an Ainu and according to the great font of knowledge Wikipedia Piłsudski's descendants currently live in Japan.
Interesting. I don't think I have ever seen your quora post. I saw the news article on the research on twitter a while ago and just went down the rabbit hole.
You forget the Austronesian-Taiwan part of Japan. Not related to any clan but should be mention if you talk about genetic here. Maybe it's worth to check out Masaman's video.
@@CoolHistoryBros I don't think they are the Jomon people. Nowadays if they are talking about Jomon people. They say that Ainus are descendants of the Jomon people. But they are different from Austronesian speaking Tribe. Ainus probably came from Siberia since most of them are concentrated in Northern Japan. And Austronesian are situated in Okinawa and Southern Japanese Mainland. Or Maybe Jomon is just an umbrella term for a group of Unrelated Tribes who live in Japan before the Yayoi people.
@@my_other_side473 Jomon were actually heterogeneous and some of the tribes were actually related to the Austronesian. And I think Yayoi and Austroasiatic might shares some connection. Haplogroup O-M176 and wet paddy rice agriculture were constitutionally important features of Yayoi; haplogroup O-M176 (Yayoi marker) and O-K18 (Austroasiatic marker) are both descended from O-M268, and not to mention that wet paddy rice farming is commonly practiced in Southeast Asia and Southern China (particularly among ethnic minorities).
I think it will be nice if this channel covers some recent archeological discoveries about ancient tombs found in south western tip of korean peninsula. These new findings tell a completely new and shocking possibilites of those protojaponic people lived in the Mahan statelets in the present day Kwangju Naju area. Their style of tombs predates that appeared later in the archipelago and the people lived threre seemed to be highly maritime. Evidence shows that they maintained their identity and remained autonomous even until the fall of Backje.
신기한거 알려드리겠습니다. 축복된 하루 되세요. The Qin dynasty or Ch'in dynasty[1] ([tɕʰǐn], Chinese: 秦朝; pinyin: Qíncháo) was the first dynasty of Imperial China lasting from 221 to 206 BC. Named for its heartland in Qin state (modern Gansu and Shaanxi), the dynasty was founded by Qin Shi Huang, the First Emperor of Qin. The word Qin,pronounced “Chin” in modern tongue, gives us China’s contemporary name. In korean Kim, or Jin. The Emperor 's SURName was not "MIDDLE" or Chin. so MIDDLE COUNTRY... makes NO SENSE. It was GOLD. or KIM. KIM SHI HWANG. 3 syllables. Just like a korean. We are not simply using "Chinese names." We ARE the real China. We bow to no Emperor. Korea has lasted for thousands of years in this way. And we still do today. Goshen is a portion of land located in North Egypt along the Nile delta described as the best land in Egypt, suitable for both crops and livestock. This is where Joseph the patriarch of the Tribe of Joseph and the Tribe Menasseh and Ephraim, married an "ASIATIC" woman in egypt (Nevermind the fact of wondering "WHERE DID THESE ASIANS COME FROM WHAT ARE THEY DOIN IN AFRICA???) If the Septuagint reading "Gesem" is correct, the word, which in its modern Hebrew form has no known meaning, it may mean "cultivated"-comparing the Arabic root j-š-m, "to labor". Egyptologists have suggested a connection with the Egyptian word qas, meaning "inundated land." (source) The word Joseon (조선) comes from the Joseon dynasty (also transcribed as Chosŏn or Chosun, Korean: 대조선국; 大朝鮮國, lit. 'Great Chosun Country') was a Korean dynastic kingdom that lasted for approximately five centuries. Already we can see some curious similarities between the two words Joseon and Goshen. Could these two words be somehow related? Indeed, The letter “J” does not exist in the Hebrew alphabet. The ‘yod’ is the closest Hebrew letter and is pronounced as a “Y,” so a name like Johnathan would be pronounced Yo-nat-tan. “Jonathan” is a transliteration of the Hebrew name into English. The phonetic sound of the letter “G” is then pronounced as a “J” sound in the Hebrew language, reading Gideon as Jideon , or Gehanna (hell) is pronounced as “Jehanna.” From this phonetics we can assume a morphology of letters to represent the same sound over time, as new languages and phonetics are introduced to the culture and population by neighboring, visiting or sojourning groups of different ethnicities. We can also infer that Goshen was probably pronounced “Joshen” or “Joseon.” Even today, in Japan a derogatory term for a Korean is “Josen-jing” meaning “man from Joshen” or a “Goshenite” - depending on the regional pronunciation used they can all sound the same. What is more, we find that the word Joseon is found as early as 700BC even in many pre-Qin dynasty (3rd century B.C.E.) texts. The meaning of this term is uncertain, but a common and using interpretation of its “borrowed” Chinese characters the name can be translated as potential meaning “morning (朝) calm (鮮)” and thus, Korea is also known as the “Land of the Morning Calm”. Though the etymological roots are contested, it is argued and often assumed that these particular characters and words were chosen to represent an “inundated or plentiful land.” - which is curiously similar to the septuagint understanding of the Hebrew word “Goshen or gesem.” ill be writing a book or making some youtube videos to explain it all one day
Baekje people and modern Koreans are not the same ancestor.” Cognitive bias People can't remember things that are inconvenient lol The genealogy of a woman named Takano Niigasa (formally Takano Ason Niigasa) who is said to be the mother of Emperor Kanmu is... ・25th Baekje King, King Muryeong 461 ・Born in Japan (Nihon Shoki) (Reign 501-523) ・Prince Junda 1st generation resident in Japan (lives in Japan as a hostage) ・Suga-kun 2nd generation resident in Japan ・Hoshi-kun 3rd generation resident in Japan ・Riki Osori 4th generation resident in Japan ・Washi Unara 5th generation resident in Japan Naturalized 1st generation (changed his name to Kazushi and naturalized in Japan) ・Washi Awakatsu 6th generation resident in Japan, 2nd generation naturalized ・Washi Jotoku 7th-generation Japanese resident, 3rd-generation naturalized · Takesuke Kazufumi 8th generation resident in Japan 4th generation naturalized ・Kazushi Otsu, the 9th resident in Japan and the 5th naturalized (he married his daughter into the Imperial family and was given the family name of Takano) * The child born by Takano Shinkasa (the 10th resident of Japan, the 6th naturalized) is Emperor Kanmu (the 50th emperor: reigned 781-806) Ten generations of Baekje immigrated to Japan ten generations ago and naturalized in Japan six generations ago. In the first place, the southern part of the Korean Peninsula was ruled by the Japanese, and the ancestors of the Chinese and Koreans were those who ruled the Yellow Sea coastal area in the north. The Chinese and Koreans have mostly common Northern Han ancestry and fought against the Northern Equestrians with the support of Japan. As proof, the Tang emperor called Baekje and Silla 'king', but Japan was called 'emperor' (天皇).
Wouldn't be more plausible that the Horserider conquest theory is compatible with the influx of "Han" DNA? The fourth century marks Goguryeo's dominance and conquest of the Xuantu and Lelang commanderies, (thus marking the rise of the Three Kingdoms of Korea) and the settlers may have spread southwards to Silla and Baekje and merged with them, as indicated from the closeness the Koreans also have with the Northern Chinese in that graph previously used. Also note that this period also interestingly coincides with the Sixteen Kingdoms period.
It seems that you are missing out on the country of Korea's Balhae. Balhae is one of the ancient kingdoms of Korea after Goguryeo. I hope you can deal with it once. Thanks for your video.
@@cassiopesysg5423 No, Balhae is Korean history. The place where Balhae was located was the land of Goguryeo, and 30 years after the fall of Goguryeo, Goguryeo general Dae Jo-yeong established Balhae. King Balhae called himself King of Goryeo in diplomatic documents, and most of the ruling class in Balhae was the Go clan. After the fall of the Khitan, hundreds of thousands of Balhae people fled to Goryeo in the south. Even today, many of the Dae clan and their descendant Tae clan remain in Korea.
@@cassiopesysg5423 To hide this fact, the Chinese government is hiding the recently discovered tomb of Empress Balhae without showing it to Korean historians.
@@한량-u7k Hundreds of thousands of Han Chinese migrated to North Korea during the Qin, Han and Jin dynasty, they actually left quite a significant number of descendants in Korea, ~40% of Korean men share the same Y DNA as 70% of Han men.
Japan is 31 miles from Korea at the narrowest part of the channel that separates the Japanese island of Tsushima from South Korea's Busan town... DUH, people migrated. :)
What a cool video. Your video make me feel better. I’m making videos about shrine and temple with Japanese and English subtitles. Thank your uploading your videos
Japanese believes Hata Clan are descendants of Jewish people who came through Yutsuki, (Yuzuki) which was mentioned in your video, that they believes originally came from Kazakhstan. (Location in Eastern Kazakhstan) Japanese are Altai speakers close related to Koreans and Mongolians, (However, many Japanese looks like Kazakh) Manchurians, not Chinese at it all. There is a link that you can check by Dr. Kubo Arimasa, he wrote a books many related to 10 Lost Tribes of Israel came to JAPAN. You mensioned that genetic does not support by genetics, Chinese either, the kaifeng Jews or any others do not have Jewish DNA. 03:04 However, many Jews have E1b1b, this is not Semitic DNA, but Hamitic. Many Jews have this DNA. E came from DE, also Jyomon People of Japan are D. Chinese and Koreans or Filipin do not have it. Only Tibet, Andaman Is. and Japan in ASIA. Arimasa Kubo said, D Haplogroups are from Manasseh and Ephraim's DNA. Sons of Rachel's, Josephs DNA. Bnei Menashe in India do not have Jewish DNA, they said they came from China. (Chinese do not have Jewish DNA)
@@weipodavid170 Tibetans have Y-haplogroup D while Han mostly belongs to Y-haplogroup O-M122 (60% or above). At least Han are pretty pure in terms of paternal lineage.
@@jackjackyphantom8854 I said tibeto not modern tibetan, half of modern Tibetan are O3a too, the same as most Han, while Han lacks D, so the likely theory is O3a went to conquer the D is tibet today. Whether those O3a were tibeto or sinitic is unsure.
I think you are missing some of the important parts of the history. It is understandable that this is a video format therefore you wouldn't be able to cover too much details. Even in Asuka region where it is considered Japanese people's place of heart, Han(Kara) people (from three to four Korean kingdoms you mentioned) were influencing their power significantly without a doubt. "Soga" Clan is the great example that although Soga came out of nowhere in Japan, they started to take over Japanese emperor's authority in flawless progression. There are tons of leftover artifacts that almost exactly matches three Korean Kingdom's artifact such as roof tile or riding horse statue etc. Soga Clan knew how to politically manifest their power of people and manipulate Emperor's people however they wanted. Although there's no direct proof, it is highly believed to be Soga most likely originated from Han people, the ones who crossed over as the name says "Toraijin." It is easily thinkable that Japan at old times wanted Chinese goods so badly therefore they have directed traded each other. Although there are good amount of cases like that but at that time crossing the ocean all the way to China was considered quite dangerous. Therefore Japan traded Chinese goods through Korea most of the time, while Korea was hectic with establishing kingdoms etc. Because 1. it was much closer to Japan and Japan was establishing good relationship with them. 2. There were some of Chinese Clans settled in Korea called "Four Han(Chinese) Conglomerate." And Japan didn't have to go all the way to China to get Chinese goods and instead get it from them in Korea. 3. Various Toraijin Korean people were already settling in Japan, politically interconnected to the people of emperor. Japanese authoritative figures became familiar with connection to Korea by that time.
For both of them, too, each other would have been an important partner when it came to relations with China and the northern powers. Unfortunately, Japan was not able to protect Baekje... lol The soga clan is probably not well translated, but mainstream research suggests that it was not a clan that suddenly appeared, but rather one of the clans that had previously been responsible for the management of the migratory people. It has been nearly 300 years since the arrival of the clan. I think that the fact that they had been in charge of the people for a long time in japan is the reason why they emerged at the stage of development of Japan. At the time, the real 'Toraijin' who had the skills were employed by the old 'Toraijin' who had been in Japan for hundreds of years to undertake their occupations, so they would not have had the opportunity to influence politics.
@@imfromearth4222 That is a quite interesting story. The fact that those original Toraijins continued to take immigration from Korea like that is definitely possible story since the connection between Korea and Japan under the mainstream sceneries has been well-known case in their historical relationship. I'm not sure about Soga clan has been there nearly 300 years except knowing they have been there for a long time and have wielded their sociopolitical power greatly, they suddenly have appeared in Japanese court at around 5th century out of nowhere.
problem with "Kara" (Gaya / Gara / Garak in Korean, all 3 names are used interchangeably) is that they did not leave any written records. So it is very difficult to figure out what their story is. Garak (Kimhae) Kim Clan (which there are many members) claims they descended from Royal family of Gara. There is possibility that they are descendants of Xiongnu Prince "Jin Midi" who served in Han Dynasty Court. Wang Mang's Xin Dynasty and it's subsequent collapse may have sent Kim clan and Heo clan to escape to Korean peninsula.
@@davidjacobs8558 There is a possibility that the name Kara derived from Kaya, most likely derived from frequent contact with Fukuoka region. But from what we can find out so far, is the name Kara from reading Han 韓 character from official Japanese historical records such as Nihonshoki, as Japanese called Korea "Karakuni" in old times. As you said it is true that there aren't many directly written records left, but for now Academia is finding out their record by searching artifacts and records of Shrine diaries etc, by matching other historical records with it. Academia has officially denied the Xiongnu Prince Jin Midi theory because 1. he was already famous figure in both China and Korea. And worshipping well-known figures was prevalent practice in both countries, such as Guanyu from Three kingdoms Romance. 2. Korea had been having intimate contact with northern arrivals for a long time. Numerous artifacts prove the majority of Korean ancestors came from north throughout various Korean kingdoms such as Buyeo. Therefore Xiongnu isn't the only one that may have indirectly influenced Korea in early Korean development. Jurchen and Xianbei for example. 3. Goryeo, Backje, Shilla all claimed certain historical figure as their ancestor. So it is not only limited to a certain country. All of the races other than Chinese wanted to be called Chinese in order to heighten their race for civilizational reason. Therefore it is taken as most likely created story that is applied to the record. 4. There has been zero symbolically Xiongnu derived artifacts or rituals found in Korea. 5. And Lastly, by the time of Jin Midi, his family has been naturalized in Han dynasty for over seven generations. And he has kept his Xiongnu tradition over 7 generations? If that is true, there should be at least single one that resembles Shilla style tomb in Han dynasty capital Xian(Changan at that time), and there hasn't been a single one found. So all we can prove so far is that various northern tribes have influenced Korea but Xiongnu isn't the only one and majority of the time it was lead by ancestral Koreans such as Buyeo and Goryeo.
So, basically what really set the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans apart are the culture, local customs and lifestyle. DNA and facial features are not the viable way to differentiate which one is who.
Yes, northern Han and Mongols also share related X chromosome (Female DNA inherited by both male and female descendants) but are majorly unrelated in Y chromosome (male inherited DNA only). The northern and southern Han are basically the same in terms of male Y chromosome due to Han immigration which was brought along with the Han(Sinitic) language to the south. In terms of X chromosome (Female DNA) southern Han are ~50% Han and ~50 Baiyue, northern Han are ~14% Baiyue. So they are basically the same people, you will find much more genetic diversity amongst for example northern and southern uyghurs and many others.
Well it's not really surprising that there would be some intermixing between some of the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese throughout history in East Asia.
Probably ancient Korean people came to Japan and then they developed their language into a different orientation. My korean friend said there are many common things in Korean and Japanese language, not just similar chinese words but also about the grammar and other things
grammar and sentence structure between Korean and Japanese is identical but the vocabulary (other than Chinese loan words) is very different.. this suggests a common origin that diverged over time.
Historically, the first immigrant groups were ancient Chinese from China's mainland but they were so small size groups relatively at the time. They were the subordinates of Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of China, and they were ordered that they should find out elixir plant to extend the emperor's life and his immortal. But that was a kind of an impossible mission, so those Chinese visitors couldn't go back to their mainland to dodge Qin's huge rage and to become survivors. And after AD.5 to 7, lots of Korean immigrant groups entered the mainland of Japan to be settlers and they were political losers' groups in the Korean peninsula, that being said. Most of them needed chances to be local lord family in Japan's inside, so they became the Japanese people who forgot their mother country and their origin. Some of those guys became the local lord of Japan's warring states so that they became perfect indigenous Japanese who were the ancestors of modern Japanese. After those eras, a few Malaysian pirate groups entered the western territories of Japan, Kansai, and they also became Japanese people. Because back then, the central govt of Japan's governing system was only limited to the mainland of Japan, Honshu, so that they could be another settler group of Japan without any dangerous moments. However, most modern Japanese citizens have been denying the historical facts that they are the descendants of those immigrants. The reason is so simple, which means Japan's historians don't want to accept their genetic features and their racial identities from China or the Korean peninsula and Southeast Asia. They are the race that originated from Japan's archipelago inside and they're not the descendants of ancient Chinese or Korean people, according to Japan's extreme nationalist groups.
I've seen many of your videos, your pronunciation of Mandarin Chinese, Korean, and Japanese is spot on. It's like you're fluent in all 3 languages, that's highly impressive. I am half Chinese, half Korean myself, and I enjoy all of your content and videos, it's highly fun and educational. Chinese, Korean, and Japanese should be all brothers and sisters with love & respect. As a matter of fact I consider all Asians to be my brothers & sisters including Vietnamese, Cambodian, Thai, Hmong, Laos, Filipino, etc. All Asians, east Asians and southeast Asians come together with love & unity (that's the goal, that's the endgame)
Me too, I find the accent of the narrator extremely intriguing, especially because his pronunciation of Mandarin Chinese, Korean, and Japanese is so accurate. Interestingly, he "mispronounces" English words occasionally.
Where do u live?
I am like you of mixed east Asian parents Years ago I had dated Chinese, Korean, and Japanese women and I enjoy and had fun with all of them. They all treated me as one of their own family members. I hate to see on youtube or other sociall media why japanese hate Chinese, or Koreans videos or Asian women dont date Asian men,Etc. What a smear champaign against us east asians and its mostly a myth majority of the time.
I am Chinese. Mostly agree. Chinese, Korean and Japanese all look like the same from appearance (Westerners usually can't tell those 3 kinds of people)! Our DNAs may be very close.
Peace to the world among all continents all people. Joy to the world !
Thank you for covering these awesome little things that many people do not know about. I love this channel.
''This time I'm gonna talk about something really interesting''
I mean, you usually talk about really interesting things lol.
Mountains everywhere.
ruclips.net/video/LeqATONm-L8/видео.html
Really interesting and from the comments section there’s big interest in this topic. Many thanks 🙏
So glad I came across your channel a few months ago. I love all history but it's harder to find stuff about the eastern world since the west focuses more on Rome etc. I love the Three Kingdoms era the most. It's just so fascinating.
spring autumn period then warring period are much interesting to know and read.
Well, thinkers (hundreds schools of thought) were born during that time, then strategies / ideologies were applied for the wars!
It is true that during the Kofun period Chinese and Korean culture spread to Japan through the arrival of immigrants. There is a Korean company from Baekje founded by Kim Myeong Lee named Go Tzun who collaborated with the famous architect from Shicuan, namely Wang Jingzhong, to build a temple and Buddha statue in Nara. Wang Jinzhong was a famous architect from China during the Tang Dynasty with his expertise in bringing Tang characteristics to the design. and the building style in Nara. In the 8th century AD, the famous Tang Dynasty monk named Jianzhen went to Japan from Beijing via Liaoning and the Korean Peninsula. Jianzhen also introduced the chinesse character and traditions and procedures for drinking tea in Japan
This IS very cool history Bros.
I'm currently working on a book, regarding the Korean War.
However, currently I'm researching the prehistory of the 3 kingdoms.
Them moving to the 1800s, and 'gunboat' politics.
Thanks soooooo much.
Goguryeo is a local regime established by the northern Chinese.
And Baiji, Silla, Goryeo (It is ancient Chinese territory and jurisdiction). The founder and the royal noble members of the royal family are Chinese. They are wearing Han officials' clothing and using Chinese characters. Civilians and slaves are indigenous Koreans at the southern end of the peninsula.
In ancient , Koreans were called "white clothes nation". Their traditional clothes were pure white and no patterns (because no dyes and dyeing technology), and adult women's clothing exposed nipples (the Korean think of being glorious and beautiful). Korean women have always used their heads to move anything (like African indigenous people).
The ancient Koreans have always insisted on wearing white clothes
(Even the Chinese ruler on the peninsula prohibits them from wearing white clothes. Provide them with dyeing technology).
But Koreans think that they insist on wearing white clothes and adult women to show their nipples. It is the most obvious traditional Korean culture in their national costumes. This can clearly determine the identity of the Chinese and Koreans.
Contrary to the traditional culture of Korean people. When the traditional Chinese culture represents the funeral ceremony of the family, it will only wear pure white clothes without patterns.
Pure white clothes without patterns in ancient China were taboos. Representing family members of the family died.
1910. Japan has swallowed South Korea. The Japanese believe that some of the low -level Korean traditional culture and primitive (women expose their nipples and transport things on their heads) are very primitive and backward. The Japanese banned Korean women from exposing the nipples (the traditional Korean costume).
The Korean people strongly resisted. South Koreans believe that this is a traditional culture of South Korea. They insist on retention.
In the Korean capital city. As long as the Japanese see those Korean women who show their nipples, they will give them penalties and slaps. After that, the Korean capital city gradually reduces Korean women's nipples. They cover the nipples with a piece of cloth.
(But in the place where there are fewer Japanese soldiers. Korean women still maintain the traditional culture that exposes nipples).
Until 1950, Westerners were still taking photos in South Korea. A photo of Korean women showing nipples on the street (traditional Korean clothing). In 1970, this kind of Korean traditional culture disappeared completely.
Your English Translation is wrong. Hata Clan section: Prince from the Baekje Kingdom. Not Beijing. I asked Kyoto Buddhist monk Hata Tribe origin. The Buddhist monk said it is well documented that Hata and Aya clan origin are Korean Kingdom Baekje aka the Kudara Kingdom. The clan origin has nothing to do with China.
You asked the Manchurians descendants of Korea. But you forget where Manchurians descended from.
Nothing to do with china? Hanbok clothing is a variation of hanfu(same goes for Japan), Korean characters are also a variation of Chinese characters, using chopsticks to eat is also from china. Eating, writing, clothing, even DNA samples says they are from china. Dafug do you know.
Cool History Bros, are you gonna make a video on Baiyue and Nanyue anytime in the future? Thank you very much.
Yes this
What do you want to know about? I can put it in my pipeline.
@@CoolHistoryBros Basically the entire history of these aforementioned civilisations.
Well, there isn't much info about the "Baiyue" (Hundred Yues). The definition also shifts through time too. So I guess I can talk about what little is known and how perception change over time.
@@CoolHistoryBros Sure, you can mention that, as well as the Nanyue. If possible, you can also mention the Nanman (southern barbarians) who lived in what is now southern China until they became Sinicised.
I never knew these clans existed. I’ve learned so much.
Can you do a video comparing Tang dynasty Armor/military with Japanese military/armor of the same period? I always find them to share alot of similarities.
I second this!
Japan at that time imported alot of weapons from Tang .
Yes, that would be interesting.
@@jonaspete We do not import weapons. Iron was mined in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula and processed in Japan to make weapons.
The culture of tea and cooking was introduced from the Tang Dynasty.
Kanji and Buddhism are not cultures that were introduced from China, but were brought with them when the Japanese came to Japan, so they are not part of Chinese culture.
Korea, China and Japan collaborative history is very complicated and interesting.
there are also several clans of craftsmen from korea and china e.g. pottery , even buddhist monks and or scholars who have settled in Japan and set up families of their own.
Yeah but those were a small ruling class. Kind of like the Normans in England
Are there Chinese ancestry among the ninja clans?
@@alvinleong269 Yes they are called Kung Fu ninja clan..
Chinese blood is more complex. Search for vengo Gao. Chinese people in Shandong are more beautiful and tall than Japanese and Korean people
Thanks you and continue the good work
excellent video as always
MA in this period finally paying off..
Really nothing to add except that the Hata are probably from Silla (Korea) or one of the bordering nations. We know this mostly from where they began to settle and a few of the traditions they brought with them. They ended up being big movers and shakers in the religious sphere so a lot of “traditional” Japanese deities are probably from mainland shamanism… which is ironic considering how these same deities were painted as so authentically Japanese during the WWII era.
I don’t have the exact dates on me, but there was also a period in early Heian where about a third of the court itself was made up of foreign clans which is sort of mind-boggling. Of course, lines eventually blurred and cultures mixed. Even so, it is a testament to just how much immigration was happening and really never completely stopped until much later in Japanese history.
One bit about the Horse Rider Theory is that if the sudden appearance of horse artifacts indicates an invader, we actually have an example for that: the Philippines.
True..
@Kalobeast 55 No academic theories I'm aware of because this isn' exactly a novel theory, ie, that there were very, very, very few horses or even horse-related artifacts from before Spanish colonization, ie horses and horse toys bought from Chinese merchants are even rarer then than people buying cars with a prancing horse on the hood from Italians today. Not that the Spanish rode around the country conquering it, they went around in boats and their authority crept inland (unlike how US cavalry made it to the mountains in Central Luzon island, which is how a suburban vacation town was developed there for the US and Philippine governments), but King Philip lived up to his name* as he maintained a stable of fine horses (contrary to what one may think if thinking of 14th C Frenchmen, no, these are not warhorses; they're trotting, pretty-maned show horses, which in dog terms is like comparing a USMC bomb dog to a poodle).
*Philos (love) + hippos (horses) >> Philippos (ie Philip; Macedon or Spain, up to you) >> Philippines
@j2ll1 the spaniards, probably
Wow excellent video bro
Comments by [insert Asian nationalist group] who ignore everything past 7:00 be like: "Japanese are Korean, Koreans are Chinese, and Chinese are Mongolians!"
Lets troll the Han Nationalists. Northern Chinese are Mongolians, Southern Chinese are Vietnamese and the only true descendants "Han" are the Hakka.
@@michaelrenper796 The Mongols and the Han are different peoples who have been fighting each other for 2,000 years
12v tbfx. You're wrong. The Mongols did not exist 2000 years ago, there are different steppe people that had inhabited that area over time. The Song dynasty was actually an ally of the Mongol against the Jurchen Jin dynasty. You can actually partially credit/blame Song for the rise of the Mongols.
Chinese are mongolians？are you kidding me？？？
Do you read some studies about DNA of Han Chinese or mongolians？
帰化人, The definition that you present in your might had been accurate in the past but in current Japanese means:
自分から願い出て、自国の国籍を捨て、他国の国籍を得て、他国民となること。
「―人」
2.
渡来した動植物が、その土地になじんで、自生・繁殖するようになること。
Which that's why when this term is translated into English is the term naturalization is the most accepted term.
To be annoyingly accurate when got my Japanese citizenship I do not remember any document with the term 「願い書」 but the terminology used is 申請する which means:
（国や公共団体の機関に）許可・認可等を求めること。
And is usually translated as submitting an application.
Really interesting video by the way.
I always appreciate the Subtitles & Time stamps.... 👍 ✌️ 💯
Hahaha
What makes me skeptical is the fact that the dual-origin model was maintained for decades, yet this study wants us to believe that a whopping 60-70% of Japanese genome is closer to Yellow River DNA than to Yayoi DNA, and that the Japanese still somehow kept their distinct language.
We've actually known for ages that there was a third migration to Japan based on archaeological evidence but there were no viable Kofun samples to perform a genetic analysis on until recently. The modern Japanese actually do show a strong affinity to ancient Amur River AND Yellow River samples. If the Yayoi are an Amur River people then it is logical to conclude that the Kofun are a Yellow River people. I do think 71% is too high of an estimate, but one of the researchers who worked on the study did mention that a lower estimate is 40%. It is possible that the Japonic languages were of Jomon period origin rather than Yayoi since the Jomon people were actually a lot more genetically heterogenous than previously assumed but genetics and linguistics don't always go hand-in-hand. A large introgression of Han-related ancestry into a population but not changing the language wouldn't be new because the same thing happened in Vietnam. Heck, the Vietnamese were genetically overwhelmed by Taic speakers to the point where they are now closer related Dai people than the Khmer or Mlabri yet they continue to speak an Austroasiatic language today.
@@haruzanfuucha
Differs too
@@haruzanfuucha
There's no such thing as ethnic Vietnamese though hence Vietnamese are ethnic Lao people admixed with mostly ethnic Di-Qiang people (O3 origin).
O1 and O2 belong to ethnic Lao peoples the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world whereas the Di-Qiang people are actually ethnic minority of China.
The Liangzhu culture was extremely influential and its sphere of influence reached as far north as Shanxi and as far south as Guangdong.
The primary Liangzhu site was perhaps among the oldest Neolithic sites in East Asia that would be considered a state society.
The type site at Liangzhu was discovered in Yuhang County, Zhejiang and initially excavated by Shi Xingeng in 1936.
A 2007 analysis of the DNA recovered from human remains shows high frequencies of Haplogroup O1 in Liangzhu culture linking this culture to modern Austronesian and Tai-Kadai populations.
We identified Mogou to be the earliest ~4000 yr. BP Di-Qiang population, and genetically related to Taojiazhai in sharing up to 100% paternal (O3a) and ~60% maternal (D4, M10, F, Z) haplogroups.
Among the alternative models considered, simulations demonstrated that Mogou and Hengbei once contributed genes into the early Northern Han.
Thus, Mogou is also similar with the Northern Han in sharing up to ~33% paternal (O3a) and ~70% maternal (D, A, F, M10) haplogroups.
laos are the ancestral homeland of east asia, mainland southeast asia and island southeast asia according to multiple sources around the world.
Lao Sichuan or Lao Sze Sichuan, Sichuanese, Nanping Lao people, Lao Yunnan, Lao Shanghai/Shanghainese, Lao Beijing/Beijingese, Mulao, Gelao, Gelong, Bouyei, Li, Hlai, Zhuang, Rau, Daic, Dai, Tai, Thai, Kradai, Tai-Kadai, Yue, Baiyue, Yayoi people, are ethnic Lao peoples formerly Ai Lao peoples also spelled Liao peoples the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world originated from Altai mountain, Mongolia over thousands of years ago.
China, Hainan Island, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Japan, Northeastern India, Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines and Hawaii, are actually founded by ethnic Lao peoples.
DNA research has shown that Sichuanese people are closely genetically related to the Daic (Dai Chinese).
Most of central Sichuan was inhabited by the Dai people who formed the serfs class, accounting for the vast majority of the population.
Han Chinese in Zhejiang and Shanghai have the highest concentration of Kra-Dai types of Y haplotypes among all the Han populations in China, suggesting a possible expansion of Kra-Dai peoples from southern China to Zhejiang via Jiangxi.
Hubei Han show significant evidence of genetic admixture deriving about 63% of ancestry from Tai-Kadai or Austronesian-speaking southern indigenous groups and 37% from Tungusic or Mongolic related northern populations.
Conclusions: The formation of Han Chinese has involved extensive admixture with Tai-Kadai or Austronesian-speaking populations in the south and Tungusic or Mongolic speaking populations in the north.
Taiwanese people are 80% southern Han Chinese (sharing ancestors with persons in Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian, Hong Kong, Macau, and Hainan).
The genetic distinction between northern and southern Han Chinese has been recognized.
again, the populations from east asia were derived from the same lineage.
in both phylogenies with different loci and populations, populations from east asia always derived from a single lineage, indicating the single origin of those populations.
@@haruzanfuucha There is a record that Goguryeo, Silla, Baekje, and Balhae paid tribute to Japan (the Yamato court).
The power relations at that time were also Sui-Tang Dynasty (Mongolia) >>> Yamato > Goguryeo >>> Silla > Baekje
It is possible that the northern Han people came to Japan via the Korean peninsula, perhaps due to the Mongol invasion.
@@山田次郎-e8i Sui and Tang weren't Mongol, the steppe nomad have only really won against China 2 times in history, the Mongol during Genghis Khan and the Manchu in late Ming dynasty, every other time it is the Chinese that kick the nomad @ss.
Cool History Bros, whats next on your awesome roadmap?
Also this video is gonna provoke an interesting comment section to say the least
Well, the next. video will be about the predynastic. mythical rulers of China. Then I will do a few videos explaining Confucianism and end the year with lighter topics like Avatar, and the history of Wuxia and Ninja fiction.
@@CoolHistoryBros NICE
@@CoolHistoryBros
>few videos explaining Confucianism
Thanks god you are doing this. Recently Confucianism has been getting a lot of misinformed shit just because it's from China. Those people emphasize stuff like 夫爲婦綱, 父爲子綱, 夫婦有別 and distort alot of their meaning to fit it into western perception of "savage" culture mold.
@@CoolHistoryBros Question. How related is the Japanese Imperial Clan to the Royal House of the Baekje Kingdom of Korea.
@@CoolHistoryBros Another great topic following your explanation of Confucianism would be on *whether Confucianism is a religion,* but I guess "what is a religion?" is also another big topic in itself because there are different definitions and ways of classification.
I've learned so much thanks
Not really.
Finally I can see interesting comments
This helps me understand my DNA taken a few months ago. Couldn't understand how I had Han DNA both Morth and South. Thanks for posting.
Differs too
Good content. Liked.
I cannot believe that Cool History Bros did not participate in the Project: Imperial China! Also, will you do a video about those cultivation novels/manhua eventually?
I'm a lot more familiar with the classic wuxias, but I can sort of look into the new ones.
@@CoolHistoryBros Well, I merely wanted to know your thought about why the protagonists in these stories have to be a bunch of arrogant punks with no manners. That's all. Heck, some of them even... well... did things to the women in their harems without their consents. If you've read Against The Gods and have read the part when Yun Che was alone with Chu Yuanchan, who was dying because of poison in her system at the time, you will know what I mean.
I think this is one of those things classified as "self-pleasure" web-novels. To be honest, a lot of those new cultivation novels are part of the Japanese Isekai Web novel culture. It became popular in Taiwan after Japan and the Mainland followed suit. I will talk about this in my history of wuxia fiction video.
@@CoolHistoryBros Thank you for your time! And when that video appeared, I will be there to watch it as soon as possible!
@@CoolHistoryBros Chinese cultivation novels began in the Han Dynasty, and after Taoism became religious, they merged with local myths to form the cultivation culture.
Thank you for a interesting video!
Personally, I think that rather than a direct mixture of the stable zone- Chinese, Japanese, Korean - the archaeological evidence suggests a buffer zone in the middle, with genetic influences from each side.
im studying ancient east asian history from language, and archaeological things.
an interesting fact is that the southern part of the Korean peninsula was partly a Jomon cultural area, so the "Yayoi" type people probably progress there already mixed, and expand from the Kitakyushu - southern Korean cultural area over a period of several thousand years.
in addition, some basic vocabulary such as place names are common to ancient Japanese, and in later era the Japanese style of Kofun also exists in the Korean peninsula, so maybe theres still no strict border of activity between korean race and japanese race in kofun era. i think thats why "new" kofun people in the video is more connected to the chinese.
Research into the language of the Kofun period suggests that the Okinawan language differentiated itself from the Japanese language during the Kofun period.
It would be interesting to see more research from different perspectives, as in the past it has been common to force the relationship between conqueror and conquered, or to seek the origins of the native peoples through political ideology.
Actually there were no Chinese, the latest study revealed this.
@@ytn00b3 Actually, Chinese are your father, the latest and forever yDNA O-M122 revealed this.
@@FF-ky3mp
O-M122 belong to ethnic Di-Qiang people they're the ancestors of the northern Han Chinese from the central plains region they speak Sinto-Tibetan language admixed with Tibeto-Burman, Mongolian, northern related people, Tai-Kadai people.
O1a and O2a belong to Tai-Kadai peoples ethnic Lao peoples the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world originated from Altai mountain, Mongolia over thousands of years ago they were the original founders of the ancient China formerly known as Qin, Qin is a Lao name surname given for China and Chinese people pronounced Gin or Jin to these days Lao people they still called China and Chinese people Jin and modern China, China is a Lao name surname pronounced Chee-Na not Child-Na they also founded Hainan island, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Japan, Northeast India, Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, and Hawaii there are also millions of ethnic Lao people living in Eastern part of central Asia countries particularly in Uzbekistan they came from Southern China during a Tang dynasty their main Y-chromosome belong to O1b.
The video are very misleading he should have said the Chinese samples that they compared to the Japanese samples were from Beijing Han, Beijing Han are ethnic Lao people their main Y-chromosome belong O1a not O3 they do mixed with northern Han from central plains region though but they're not ethnic Di-Qiang people they also speak different language from the yellow River basin people people (Sino-Tibetan speaking people).
Yayoi main Y-chromosome belong to O1a and O2b not O3 they're the majority of the Japanese population not minority.
Yayoi people and Kofun people are ethnic Lao people not ethnic Di-Qiang people.
Japanese populations are mostly ethnic Lao people the rest are Yellow River basin people (ethnic Di-Qiang people), Jomon, Ainu, northern related people...
Lao Sichuan/Sichuanese, NanPing Lao, Lao Yunnan/Yunnan Han, Lao Shanghai/Shanghainese, Lao Beijing/Beijing Han, Jining Han, Mulao, Gelao, Rau, Zhuang, Yue/Baiyue, Daic, Dai, Tai, Thai, Kradai, Tai-Kadai peoples are ethnic Lao peoples.
Laos are the ancestral homeland of East Asian, MSEA, and ISEA peoples according to 23 and Me, and many Universities around the world.
@@FF-ky3mp The video didn't mention about haplogroup, it's not detailed enough.
Chinese and Japanese are vastly different in term of Y-haplogroup distribution.
Yayoi were O-M176 + O-M122, and modern Japanese are mostly D1b + O-M176 + O-M122 -- but Han people are mostly O-M122, and O-M176 is almost absent from them. On a note, O-M122 is pretty prevalent across Asia, it's not unique to Han people.
Although Japanese and Northern Chinese have similar mtDNA, and I think that's where the similarities mostly came from.
The Chinese in the north are diverse. Shandong is not rich, but it is the highest in the whole East Asia. If you exclude some mixed blood, the average height can be compared with northern Europe!
You're a good sport for even entertaining the "lost tribe of Israel" theory, but you gave it about as much attention as it deserved I think 🤣 quick mention 'probably not true,' moving on!
Edit: somehow I didn't expect this to turn into the history channel forum but Silly Me I guess! 🤣
Not just that, but the hexagram was not a symbol of judaism at the time of this migration. And by goodness sake the lost tribes of israel were lost a looooong time ago before these migrations, furthermore we can't conspire anything because the tribes were not literally lost, they ceased to exist and the members integrated into other local cultures within Mesopotamia.
@@order_truth_involvement6135 Israel is rather far away so maybe the migration just took that long
Though yeah it’s probably just a coincidence
@@jonathanwilliams1065 There's absolutely no evidence to even assume this was a migration from Palestine, the name of the territory as the actual ancient Israelites called it.
@@order_truth_involvement6135 Yea it's like saying Buddhists are Nazi related for the swastika
@@order_truth_involvement6135 first off the ancient Israelites called the land Israel or Canaan, with the southern part being known as Judah, and in later years most of it became known as Judea
The Name “Palestine” didnt exist until AD 135, when the Romans renamed Judea after the Jews ancient enemies, the philistines
Nah, I don't think there's any need to fear the comment section, since these days the nationalism has largely died down in both Korea and Japan, so at least, talking about the possible links between the two in ancient times need not be volatile.
Personally, I think it's undeniable there were certain waves of migration, but at the same time I don't think the self-proclaimed lineages are actually based on any real historical event. I think it's a product of just a common trend in antiquity of all cultures to claim their ancestry as that of exotic and prestigious outsiders.
Like how the Romans claimed they came from Aeneas of Troy, the Kingdom of Goryeo claimed their ancestry traces back to the Tang imperial family, and the Merovingians claimed they were of Jesus's bloodline.
You're right, but the latter is a modern idea. The Merovingians descended from Clovis, the first Frankish king who converted to Christianity.
And of course each Church claiming to come from a specific Apostle thus legitimizing in their own minds their claim to existence
@@daithiocinnsealach1982 The church has documents, however.
I want to hear more about Goryeo claiming Tang imperial family I thought they claimed Goguryeo instead?
@@alessandrodelogu7931 yeah. Blame Dan Brown
It is very clear that since the Kofun period the entire societal template in Japan until the restoration period is the steppe culture template. From the class system, honour, clan/khan structure, war style, horse culture, martial arts, religion … 🤷♂️
Thanks for covering this topic! I was doing my own research and found out this too. Apparently it wasn't a well know topic, at least in the English speaking realm.
I'm an Australian of mixed Chinese and European ancestry. I've known that ancient Chinese migrated to Japan for at least 40 years. I'd heard somewhere that a large % of Japanese people are descended from Chinese. Of course it makes sense that Korean people would also have migrated to and traded with Japanese and Chinese people. That area is in many ways similar in geopolitical and trading histories as Britain with Denmark, the Netherlands etc. A constant flow back and forth of political, religious, cultural, technological ideas, goods, DNA, etc.
As a Malaysian, I can confirm that main 3 East Asian countries just like Maphilindo
Does this include the Ryukyu people? I always thought the history and overall genetic makeup in this region was somewhat different from greater Japan.
To my knowledge, the horserider theory is largely abandoned in mainstream studies
Thank you for all the content you provide us
Look at the origin of the Japanese word for 'horse'. Horses were introduced from Mainland Asia. UMA うま is the apparent 'native Japanese word' for "horse"馬. (The later Chinese borrowing for the Kanji was BA バ). Nasalised inital 'u' う then 'ma' ま- (possible ancient Chinese somewhere pronounced like "MMBA")?
When Netflix was casting extras for their TV show "Marco Polo" in Malaysia and it had Kublai Khan in it, i was casted as a Tang Dynasty person even though I was a rather dark skinned Chinese person. Got me thinking about genetic admixture.. About Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Mongolians, South East Asians, its all over the place...
I still miss that show
The new study regarding to Kofun population is very misleading as the researchers only had a very few samples. It was only 3 individuals from the Kofun period and it was all from the same burial site.
It stated: There are caveats to this analysis. First, we are limited to only two Late Yayoi individuals from a region where skeletal remains associated with Yayoi culture are morphologically similar to Jomon (16). Yayoi individuals from other regions or other time points may have different ancestral profiles, e.g., continental-like or Kofun-like ancestry. Second, our sampling is nonrandom, as is the case of our three Kofun individuals coming from the same burial site (table S1). Additional ancient genomic data will be necessary to trace temporal and regional variation in the genetic ancestry of Yayoi and Kofun populations and provide a comprehensive view of the tripartite structure of Japanese populations proposed here.
Differs as well
I took a History of Asian Civ course in college a few years ago, and the professor taught us the Horse Rider Thesis without ever mentioning that it was controversial. I was so mad when I googled it for more information and found out how far from settled it was. Not nearly as mad as I was when that same professor taught us that the Altaic Language Family was real, though...
welcome to the world of post-uni.
Honestly even if they were migrants from the yellow river region, or southern korea; if they could afford the journey chances are they brought horses.
There is this black and white attitude towards horses in east asian history, not everyone south of mongolia with a horse was some cashed up noble on a chariot.
@@anasevi9456 One interesting aspect (which is rarely mentioned) is the lack of composite bows in ancient Japan whereas your typical horse rider is almost unthinkable without it... instead Japanese archers were using those clumsy longbows...
@@anasevi9456 The issue with the Horse Rider Thesis isn't really whether or not there were people bringing horses to Japan, it's more an issue of whether they came gradually or in one big migration - the Horse Rider Thesis proposes the latter, while the former is more firmly supported by most evidence.
@@SomasAcademy However, it is interesting to note that the Horserider theory can attest to the large migration of "Northern Han" peoples in this time period, as it corresponds to the conquest of the Chinese Commanderies of Xuantu, Daifang, and Lelang by Goguryeo, Formation of the "Three Kingdoms of Korea", reigns of Ojin and Jingu, and the start of Baekje's ties with Japan. It also occurs during the Sixteen Kingdoms period as well.
Interestingly, Geunchogo of Baekje was called General Stabilizing the East and the Administrator-General of Lelang, possibly indicating some kind of continuity or relationship with Lelang.
As a Finn studyin philology I feel deeply offended by the Altaic language family theory lol
I don't understand these graphs 7:29. The left one says Koreans are closer to Japanese, the right, Chinese (east asia) are. Usually former is believed, you make it sound like the latter is the case.
The Vietnamese received so much genetic impact from the Han Chinese over the course of 2000 years (with half of that being spent as a literal part of China), the Vietnamese hardly phenotypically or culturally resemble their Hoabinhian ancestors at all. They are the Southeast Asian ethnic group with by far the most Northeast Asian ancestry, but the Vietnamese continue to speak an Austroasiatic language which is very Southeast Asian. Out of all the extant language families in Southeast Asia, Austroasiatic has had a presence in the SEA region for the longest.
The vietnamese language prior to western invasion, the kings read and write in chinese. This can be verified in the vietnamese museum of history hochi minh city and many other vietnamese cities.
When the french invaded vietnam, they change their language because they didnt like the native language and that they couldnt read it. The vietnamese language today is based on the french language.
@@td7074 language has nothing to do with ethnicity
There are two types of Vietnamese, one is native and the other is from China. Vietnamese originally are from China, they migrated from China at least 5,000 years ago. The native type consists of aboriginal tribes. The Latin name Vietnam is derived from Yue Nam, an English transliteration from a Chinese name. Originally Yue Nam was Nam Yue, it was started by the Chinese Yue about 2,000 years ago. The Chinese Yue mixed with the aboriginal natives and they became Bai Yue, meaning hundred Yue tribes.
@@dearcoolz
ethnicity
[ eth-nis-i-tee ]
noun, plural eth·nic·i·ties.
An ethnic group or ethnicity is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups such as a common set of traditions, ancestry, language, history, society, culture, nation, religion, or social treatment within their residing area.
@@td7074
Those kings were all Chinese originally from China. Y-DNA analysis proofs they were Chinese not native aborigines.
Question. How related is the Japanese Imperial Clan to the Royal House of the Baekje Kingdom of Korea.
the modern clan is not so much(because its more related to fujiwara/heike clan), but in heian era, the influence on the X chromosome seems to have been greater because of the mother of Emperor Kammu. nevertheless, this is not directly related to the Baekje Royal House because arrival in Japan 200 years ago. Other tribes before kanmu have been related to the Emperors after several generations of mixing with the Japanese, so it depends on how far you define "related".
Due to studies of Ydna of male members of the Japanese imperial family, they were not from Korea but most likely a paternal lineage of the native Jomon people.
@@capmidnite : He has been going through history channels and making ridiculous claims, most of his sources are from Chinese websites or western sources that has a fetish for their woman.
@@capmidnite It’s not wild assertion, it’s quite the common knowledge amongst the genetics community for a long time now, you just never heard about it because you don’t look for it, haplogroup D is the ydna of the Japanese imperial family, the same ydna of the native Jomon people and many Japanese clans that are branches from the imperial family.
@@hwasiaqhan8923 i respect to your research, but the uniform DNA-level categorisation of "Jomon" is highly arbitrary and hardly objective. It is more limited in scope than categorisations such as "Yayoi" or "Ancient Korean", but that is all.
Even the Yayoi are descendants of the Jomon, given their nearly 20,000 years of history, advanced navigational skills and wide distribution, and the Kofun are "descendants of the Jomon with Chinese genes". It is true that the Y chromosome goes back to the Jomon, but the X chromosome and mitochondrial chromosomes must also be considered together to determine our "genetic heritage".
Interesting observation about horse figurines in the kofuns. Western Han Chinese were able to fight the nomad Huns who lived in what is modern day Mongolia and Xinjiang because they imported better quality horses from Central Asia during (Han) Wu Emperor's reign. Giant imperial tombs have been a tradition in China since Qin Dynasty. You probably have heard of or seen the terracotta (clay) warriors and horses excavated from (Qin) Shihuangdi's tomb in northwestern China. Just my personal opinion, the "Horse Riders from North China" theory seems quite plausible.
Also different
Tumuli culture was brought over from the Korean peninsula.
Starting from days back with Yamatai-koku, until Japan closed (Sakoku) the country AC.1639 or 1641, Japan had serious interracial relationships with China and Korea who becomes their ancestors. The collapse of Korea and China dynasty also created several migrations into Japan as well.
And the Chosokabe Clan that claim descent from Qin Shi Huang.
Really hope the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese can live in peace and create happiness for the world🙏
Despite the differences.
They cannot accept they are blood related 😂
Never gonna happen, the fact that Korean hates Han Chinese and Japanese, Chinese hates Japanese and look down on Korean and Japanese look down on both Chinese and Korean.
@@OkOk-qd2nc The southern part of the Korean Peninsula was originally ruled by the Japanese (Wajin). WW2 has little to do with it.
The ancestors of Chinese and Koreans lived in the northern part of the Yellow Sea coast, but after the fall of the Han Dynasty, they moved to the southern part of the Korean Peninsula.
Baekje and Silla are called kings by the Tang emperors, but Japan is called emperor.
@@山田次郎-e8i Here comes the Japanese Nationalist.
I'm always looking forward to your videos man. Thanks✌✌
Thats pretty cool. I wonder how these groups of people looked like before the genetic merger. Would be pretty cool to see the evolutionary change across the ages.
Probably more African and as we moved further north our skin lightened in reaction to the colder climate. Those with lighter skin absorbed more sunlight perhaps.
@@daithiocinnsealach1982 african? Nah, facial structure arent african at all, could facial structure change as they go north?
Skin color ,sure
@@Mariuslorca it could if given enough time maybe, afterall all humans were descendants of apes...do we look like apes now? nope..
@@lyhthegreat if thats the case, you think africans today looks the same as 6 millions ago?
@jin gu
I mean it would be odd if we didnt come from africa as from what I at least was lead to believe is that modern humans developed in Africa, like other human ancestors
so technically any group of humans originates from there far enough back
From what I've read on MyHeritage, is that Koreans and Japanese along with northern Chinese are the most genetically homogeneous group on earth.
Differs too
Interesting fact: the Star of David has nothing to do with King David. There is no evidence he used any sort of star for his emblem. It’s a more esoteric symbol that got adopted and named after him.
I do think that, maybe, horesmen did invade Japan, or at least migrated there. It would be strange if they didn't. Also, their admixture with Chinese and Korean would explain why these very different linguistic groups share a lot of genetic similarities.
The horsemen conquest dynasty theory is now complete fiction. The key-shaped burial mound of the emperor, which is characteristic of Japan, continues from the 3rd century AD to the 7th century AD. This would not be possible if the horsemen were conquering. Also, it is impossible to ship a large number of horses to conquer Japan at that time.
@@shion_bluerider not really if they crossed in Hokkaido from the north when the passages are frozen. However, this might not be the case since the Ainu don't seem to incorporate horseriding as part of their culture.
@@kuroazrem5376 you clearly have no knowledge of ancient NE Asia....
@@shion_bluerider Is it? The massive influx of genetic material indicates displacement above anything else. The Japonic languages also have seemed to diverged around 1450-1700 years ago, also indicating that the Horserider theory has some merit. The Horseriders would've likely been those of Sinitic and Buyeo descent, unlike modern Koreans who are Samhan in linguistic origin.
@@Innomenatus The Chinese migration in to N.Korea displaced the original Koreans from N.Korea to migrate to S.Korea, and the japonic people(Yayoi) who were natives of S.Korea were forced to migrate to Japan and displaced the Jomon.
There was neither China nor South Korea in ancient times.
Mainland China, which lived in ancient times, is a different ethnic group.
The jomon were hunters and barbarians with no culture or writing. The Chinese and Korean bloodlines brought farming to Japan. Brought light to japan
5:59 "帰化人" actually, literally means "return change people". Pretty good analysis in this video, but the Hata Clan's 秦氏 relation to Israel could be explored much further, because there is a lot of evidence in favor of that position.
I doubt it, especially since there were no "lost tribes of Israel"
Literally no evidence. Genetics disproves it
@@thestealth2448 Study harder, Stealth.
symbol of star is older than the israel version tho mesoamerica has it too, nobody can claim it.
@@earlysda Hata clan’s ydna are O3a, related to 70% of Han Chinese, O3a is a typical East Asian haplogroup too, nothing Jew about them
I’m reading Eili Oguma on the genealogy of Japan’s self-images, so this video came at a perfect time!
What is "Japan’s self-images"?
@@earlysda That's a big question, but the focus is on whether, when and why Japanese people have conceived of themselves as a homogeneous, ethnically and culturally 'separate' race (an idea the book claims to be of surprisingly late origin) versus the idea of Japan as ethnically and culturally diverse, including various immigrant groups from Korea and China, as well as (during the time of the empire) Korea and parts of China itself. Of course, it's difficult to maintain the image of yourself as a sequestered island people and as a sprawling multi-ethnic empire at the same time - although the British gave it a good go - and it's interesting to me (especially as a Brit) to see some familiar arguments and contradictions played out in the very different context of east Asia.
I find it really interesting how we don't really know our origins if you go back far enough. It means we don't know how we got here as a society, our origins fade into the mist in the same was as an individuals history fades when they consider their childhood.
The horse invader theory is interesting in that with a few centuries, they forgot how to fight on horses. Then had to relearn it again fighting/learning from the Imishis.
Animal husbandry wasn't very common among old western and central Japanese but
more of northern Japanese practice where Emishi (not Imeishi) used to live.
They definitely have more Jomon connections than the rest and perhaps even part Ainu.
Anyway, horses came to Japan along with riders and pastoralism from north east Asia and spread from there. Northern Japan (Tohoku region) was known for horse raising
and export to other areas of Japan for a long time.
good timing bro
as one of the clans like sa teak or sa clan as i recall bec of the annexation of silla on baekje
Very interesting
I read a few years ago on the "Genetic Heritage" of National Geographic study that the genetic difference between Japanese and Chinese is about 1%.
Also, Chinese people not knowing Japanese language can read Japanese newspaper and guess what it is about. Japanese language uses primarily Chinese characters.
It’s because Japanese borrowed Hanzi (Kanji) - linguistically, Japanese are completely different from Chinese languages.
Although Chinese might be able to recognise hanzi characters, they wouldn’t be able to understand most of Japanese words because the usage is quite different. As for grammar.. well, it’s totally different! Genetically, there will be some similarities, but Koreans are closer to Japanese than Chinese to Japanese.
@@jun8569 Probably, but 40% of korean men carry the same Y DNA as 70% of Chinese so for a long time the Korean thought they went to Japan but earlier than that the Koreans probably came from Chinese who migrated to Korea or maybe later during the Han-Jin colonisation of northern Korea.
@@jun8569 You CANNOT use linguistic to tell where an ethnicity originate from. Language CANNOT define a person’s or an ethnicity origin. For example people from Finland are mostly caucasian but they speak an Asian language. Another example is modern day Turkish people from Turkey is mostly european and middle east ancestry but they speak an Asian language. So in conclusion, sometimes the language CANNOT determine where the ethnicity come from tbh.
Just to add on, if you want to link Japanese and Korean to Altaic, then its just plain nonsense. Cause "Altaic" is rejected by most of linguists. There is no such thing as Altaic. Altaic theory is mostly seen as discredited. (Also just to add on, the Sino- Tibetan language might be related to Dene- Yeneisian language family. So what you called the Sino-Tibetan might be closest to Yeneisian people from Siberia and also Na-dene people from the Arctic/ Alaska. Of course these is controversial as well)
This recent study that Japanese derived from Jomon people, Yayoi people from Northeast Asia and Kofun people from China
is published by Japanese themselves. If you want to question and bash, then you should ask the japanese that publish this recent study/ article.
@@hwasiaqhan8923 No, the Jurchens and Khitans are not Chinese. They are xiongnu/mongoloid races and cultures. Their oral language, writing, culture and traditions are not Confucian. Koreans are Turkic descended.
@@Tekhelet75 Lmao ‘Turkic’ there’s no such thing as Turkic genetically so what do you mean by Turkic descendants? Uyghur and Turkish don’t look the same obviously they are different genetically and now you’re adding the korean who look even more unrelated physically so what exactly is ‘Turkic’?
And yes, korean are majorly haplogroup O which is the same with the Chinese, Turkic? They are a mix bag of R C K J I Q etc
We gonna talk about the Emishi? You should totally do a video on that.
Chinese & Korean Clans of Japan is because the ancestors of the Japanese are Chinese & Korean,including race and civilization
Interesting!
I once saw a documentary where a professor from a Japanese University said that Japanese and Chinese DNA's are 98% identical. Well, this is not surprising at all when both countries had massive exchanges and the exchanges could have been well before the heyday of China's Tang dynasty. Exchanges must've had marriages and same with the Koreans.
Didn't you saw where it's said the Yellow River basin people (ethnic related to Di-Qiang people O3 origin), and Southern people (ethnic Lao people O1 and O2 origin) are two different ethnic groups of peoples?
The Chinese samples that they compared to the Japanese samples were from Beijing Han, Beijing Han are ethnic Lao people their main Y-chromosome belong O1a not O3 they're mixed with northern Han from central plains region though they also speak different dialect from the yellow River basin people (Sino-Tibetan speaking people).
Yayoi main Y-chromosome belong to O1a and O2b not O3.
Japanese populations are mostly ethnic Lao people the rest are Yellow River basin people (ethnic Di-Qiang people), Jomon, Ainu, northern related people...
Lao Sichuan/Sichuanese, NanPing Lao, Lao Yunnan/Yunnan Han, Lao Shanghai/Shanghainese, Lao Beijing/Beijing Han, Jining Han, Mulao, Gelao, Liao, Rau, Zhuang, Yue, Baiyue, Daic, Dai, Tai, Thai, Kradai, Tai-Kadai, are ethnic Lao peoples.
@@oneviwatara9384 Lao Beijing means Old/Native beijinger, same applies to the rest of your examples, nothing to do with Laos. You’re redefining words here. Implying your logic, Australian are from Austria because they both have Aus in their country names, or English are descendants of Indian because En is a phonetic reference to In, India. You’re fking weird.
yet you just named more than half of China’s regions and said they are all genetically Laos and O1 come from Laos, yet if that’s true O1 would be the largest ydna group of China but it isn’t. Plus Laos aren’t even the largest contributor to O1, Han are.
@@hwasiaqhan8923
I got news for you there is no such thing as ethnic Han Chinese or ethnic Chinese people though but there is ethnic Lao peoples though the largest ethnic groups of peoples in the world originated from Altai mountain, Mongolia over thousands of years ago they were the original founders of ancient China/modern China, they also founded Hainan island, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Japan, Northeastern India, Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, and Hawaii.
Sinitic is just mean Southern Chinese peoples.
East Asians people living in Eastern part of central Asia countries are mostly ethnic Lao peoples they came from Southern China during a Tang dynasty there are also millions of ethnic Lao peoples living in inner Mongolia/Mongolia some even migrated to Siberia over centuries ago.
@@oneviwatara9384 That’s false, the Han are more real than Laos or “tai-kradai ethnicity” which is a modern linguistic term for studies no one even refer to themselves as a “tai-kradai” person. Laos is also a quite modern name go back a couple hundred years and no one would’ve heard of this term.
@@oneviwatara9384 You’re sad your “Laos” people are not living the best lives today so you try to distort history based on your personal fantasies to compensate your peoples lack of impressiveness in history by saying you’re the real ‘founders’ of civilisations lmao, you remind me of those Black people who claimed they established all ancient civilisations from China to Egypt, maybe in a different universe, but not this one.
7:06 この図を見る限り、琉球人やヤマト人は漢民族や韓国人より遺伝的に北方系によりシフトしており、オーストロネシア成分が少ない事がわかる。琉球人もヤマト人も北方漢民族や韓国人より体格が小さいのに、漢民族や韓国人より北方系なのは面白い。琉球人は二重瞼率が高く、オーストネシア系なのではないかと推測される事が多いが、ヤマト人よりもオーストロネシア成分が少なく、東南アジア人からより離れている。琉球人の容姿が時々、東南アジアに近いように見えるのは、縄文遺伝子由来なのであってオーストロネシア成分ではないということだ。
Where do the Ainu of Hokkaido fit in? It is interesting to see where their DNA originated.
In my opinion, Ainu are more a Russian than a Chinese or Korean decent.
@@nikkosr888 Ainu have haplogroup D which is prevalent in Yamato, Ryukyuan, Tibeto-burman speaking populations and Andaman. Russian have haplogroup R which is closer to Europeans. Ainu and Russian are not genetically related.
He mentioned Jomon. Ainu and Ryukyuan are Jomon people.
If we look at Y DNA (Male DNA lineage) alone, we could already see there were Han(Sinitic) and Korean related migration to Japan, Hata Clan’s Y DNA is haplogroup O2a2b1a1 (formerly known as O3a2c1a), the most common lineage among Han Chinese, and specifically to the O-CTS10738 subclade found in both China and Japan. The Hata clan was founded by Chinese immigrants during the Kofun period (250-538). They became the ancestors of a number of samurai clans, such as the Akizuki, Chōsokabe, Kawakatsu and Tamura.
What a load of BS..
@@jun8569 no u
@@jun8569 Everybody YT writes own narrative and don't provide proof (historical written records artifacts links ) that's the funny part 🤣
Would you ever make a video about the historical relationship between Vietnam and Korea? Like about the royal Lý clan?
That would be very interesting.
The people who came to Japan from around the 3rd century to the 7th century are genes of the O2 lineage and are northern Han people.
The Yayoi people came to the Japanese archipelago from the vicinity of the Yangtze River in mainland China, and some Yayoi people went north to the Korean Peninsula.
O1b2a1a2 (F2868) - Japanese Archipelago←【Parent A】
O1b2a1a2a (L682) - High frequency on the Korean Peninsula ← [Child B of parent A]
O1b2a1a2a1 (CTS723) - Korean Peninsula ←【Child C of Child B】
O1b2a1a2a1a (CTS7620) - Nanai tribe in northeastern China ← [child C's child D]
Current Korean Y chromosome DNA, O2, O1b2 and C.
Some of the Yayoi people migrated from the Japanese archipelago to the Korean Peninsula in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula, and the ancestors of the northern Han people lived in the northern part.
However, as the ancestors of the Mongolians migrated south, they fled to the southern part of the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago.
The Tang Empire, which was at war with Japan, was a country ruled by the Mongols.
The Sui, Tang, and Yuan empires were ruled by the Mongols.
The Qing Dynasty was ruled by the Jurchen.
It is not the history of the Han people.
Lol go study hard, history doesn't run on emotions.
@@OkOk-qd2nc If you study history a little more, you'll understand.
@Ok Ok He is a typical Japanese historical distortionist lol But I think there are people like this in every country
I'm a little confused 2:10 if the Hata clan is Chinese in origin why would it's head be a prince of Baekjae? This entire video seems to some how be trying to tie Japanese ancestry to China via Korea, wth? There are plenty of proof that ties Korea and Japan but when did China become involved. Why is China attempting to stretch it's reach over all of Asia by any means necessary even if it means revising history and propagating the false idea that China is the center of all Asian history and culture.
1，Old asian=D-M174 and C-M130→Origin: Mongolia or Central Asia
Phylogenetic trees D (M174)=D1
D1=D1a+D1b=D1a1+D1a2+D1b=D1a1+（D1a2a+D1a2b）+D1b
D1=D1a+D1b（Philippines）
D1a =D1a1+D1a2
D1a1→Mainland China, Tibet
Tibetan 51.6%
D1a2→D1a2a Janpanese 35-40％
D1a2b Andaman Islands 100%
Phylogenetic trees C-M130=C1 +C2=C1+C2a+C2b+C2c+C2d+C2e
C2a→Native American
C2b→Tungusic（Mongolian+Manchu people），Kazakh，Hazara
Kazakh 50.85%
Mongolian 53.8％
C2c→Pan-Asian（China, Japan, Korea, Central Asia, Southeast Asia）
2，New Asian=NO-M214→Origin:Mainland China，Indochina
Phylogenetic trees K2a1→NO-M214=N (M231)+O (M175)
N (M231)→Siberians indigenous→Uralian languages+Yakut
Nenets people 97.3%
Nganasan people 92.11%
Yakut people 88.4%
Phylogenetic trees O-M175=O1+O2=O1a+O1b+O2a+O2b
Baiyue people O1=O1a+O1b1+O1b2 ，The Liangzhu/Hemudu culture
O1a→Austronesian
Fujian O1a→Taiwan→Philippines→Oceania→
Austronesian，Taiwanese aborigines 89.6%O1a
O1b1→Tai-Kadai→Laos
O1b2→Korean
O2→Sino-Tibetan=Han chinese+Tibetan
The most common Y-DNA haplogroup among present-day East asian：NOCD+Q
Haplogroup P1=Q (Q-M242) +R (R-M207) Origin: Central Asia
Phylogenetic trees P1 =Q1+R1+R2=Q1+R1a+R1b+R2
Q1→Native American
Ket people 93.7%Q
Navajo 92.3%Q
Genetic history of Indigenous peoples of the Americas：Q1，C-P39，R1
R1a→Scythians/Proto-Indo-Europeans
In India, high frequencies of this haplogroup is observed in West Bengal Brahmins (72%) to the east, Gujarat Lohanas (60%) to the west
Pashtun，Iranian，Tajik→R1a
R1b→Western Europe
R2 has been concentrated geographically in South Asia
Egypt, North Africa→E/G
indian→L/H
Jews and Arabs→J
Semitic people→J-M304=J1+J2，It is believed to have evolved in Western Asia.
J1 is in modern times most frequent in the Arabian Peninsula: Yemen (up to 76%),Saudi (up to 64%) (Alshamali 2009), Qatar (58%),and Dagestan (up to 56%)
J2 is found in the highest concentrations in the Caucasus and the Fertile Crescent/Iraq
The highest ever reported concentration of J2 was 72% in Northeastern Georgia (Nasidze 2004).
Korean = 20% to 37%O1b2+ 40%O2 (M122)+15%C-M217
1，Southeast China O1b→Korean Peninsula→ Manchuria
Farmer/plant rice
辰國JIN/三韓Samhan
2，Yunnan O2→Qinghai → Northern China → Huaxia
people/O2a2b+O2a2a → Manchuria
nomadic people /Growing grain crops (wheat and barley)
Sino-Tibetan →Sinitic+Tibeto-Burman
古朝鮮/濊族
Han 80% O
Korean 70% O
3，Mongolia C2b→ Manchuria → Tungusic peoples→ Korean Peninsula
nomadic people
Xiongnu/Altaic languages=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic
匈奴/突厥
C2a→Native American
C2b→Tungusic（Mongolian+Manchu people），Kazakh，Hazara
Kazakh 50.85%
Mongolian 53.8％
C2c→Pan-Asian（China, Japan, Korea, Central Asia, Southeast Asia）
Oroqen people 61%-91% C2
Evenks 44%-71% C2
Janpanese=35-40％D1+30-35％O1b2+15-20％O2 (M122)
D1=D1a1+D1a2，Tibetan=D1a1，Jomon people=D1a2
1，D1 → Mongolia C1a1/C2e→ Hokkaido →Japan →Jomon people D1a2
2，Korean Peninsula O2+O1b2 →Janpan→Yayoi people
Janpanese=Jomon people+Yayoi people
Mongolian=53.8％C-M217+10.8％O2 (M122)+10.8％N+4.6P* (xQ,R)+9.2R1a
C=C1+C2a+C2b+C2c+C2e
1，Central Asia P* (xQ,R)→Mongolia
2，Mongolia C2a+QR→ Bering Strait →North America→ Native American
Yeniseian people/Kets 93.7%Q
Navajo 92.3%Q
3，NO2 →Mongolia
Indochina K2a→NO→O1+O2→O1a+O1b+O2
N1→Mongolia→Siberia→Northern Europe→Uralic+Yakuts，Yakuts→88.4%N1
Tibetan= 51.6% D + 33.9% O2 (M122) + 2.6% C-M217
Yunnan O2 → Qinghai → Tibet → Tibetan (aborigines D1a1 + O2)
Baiyue origin：
O1/Baiyue=O1a+O1b=O1a+O1b1+O1b2
The Liangzhu/Hemudu culture→ Ydna O1
Fujian O1a→Taiwan→Philippines→Oceania→
Austronesian，Taiwanese aborigines 89.6%O1a
Guangdong and Guangxi O1b1→Tai-Kadai→Laos
O1b2→Korean Peninsula，Tai-Kadai/Zhuang people 70%O1b1
Eurasian yDNA：P* (xQ,R)=Q*+R1a+ R1b
Scythians/Proto-Indo-Europeans → haplogroup R1a（Pashtun，Iranian，Tajik）
Western Europe and Russia → R1b
Xiongnu，Lake Baikal →Q1
Semitic people/Near East →J（Jews and Arabs）=J1+J2
J1-Yemen 76%，Saudi 64%，Qatar 58%
J2-Northeastern Georgia 72%
Egypt, North Africa→E/G
indian→L/H
Near East J→Central Asian R1a→Xinjiang →Tocharian
Mongolia C2O2N+Tocharian JR1a→Uyghurs
Mongolia C2O2N+Central Asian JR1aGE→Turkic people
Kazakhstan→70.63% NOCDQ
Kyrgyzstan→ 31.06% NOCQ
Uzbekistan→17%NOC
Uyghurs→30%-35%
Tajiks are not Turkic→ 8%-10%
Turkey→ 7%CNQ
Korean C12.9 D2.5 N3.8 O1a 3.1 O1b 33.4 O2 42.1 Q1.8
Manchuria C14.3 D0 N5.7 O1a 2.9 O1b 8.6 O2 65.7 Q0
Han (China) C6.0 D0.6 N9.0 O1a 9.6 O1b 16.3 O2 55.4 Q0.6
South China C9.6 D2.1 N4.4 O1a 6.8 O1b 17.4 O2 57.8
Western Japan C7.2 D26.8 O1a 4.1 O1b 37.1 O2 23.9
Eastern Japan C3.6 D48.2 O1b 14.5 O2 0.7
Northeast Japan C12.5 + D 87.5 = 100%
Vietnamese C4.3 D2.9 N2.9 O1a5.7 O1b 32.9 O2 40 Q7.1
Tibet C2.6 D51.6 N4.5 O2 33.9 Q3.2
Mongolia C53.8 J3.1 N10.8 O2 10.8 R1a 9.2
Central Asian: Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmen
Mongolian, Manchu people
Yakut, Tajik, Yeniseian people
1, Turkey
Anatolian Turks=
1, R1b (15.9%), R1a (6.9%) J (33%), E (10.7%), G (10.9%), L (4.2%)
2. C2 (1.3), N (3.8%), Q (1.9%)
The main sources of Turkish descent are Middle Eastern J and European R1b, not Turkic people/Xiongnu→7%CNQ
2. Kazakhstan
1, C2 (50.85%), O2 (10.82%), N (5.33%), Q (3.17%), D (0.46%)
2. R (12.13%), J (8.19%), G (4.95%), E (1.78%)
Mongoloid / East Asian→70.63%NOCDQ
3. Kyrgyzstan
1, C2 (19.7%), O2 (6.1%), N (4.5%), Q (0.76%)
2, R(59.1%), J(5.3%), E(0.76%), H(0.76%)
Mongoloid / East Asian→31.06%NOCQ
4. Tajik
45% R1a, 8% R2, 18% J, 8% C
Tajiks are not Turkic
In South Asia, R1a1a has often been observed
West Bengal Brahmins (India)→72.22%R1a
Uttar Pradesh Brahmin (India)→67.74%R1a
Bihar Brahmins (India)→60.53%R1a
Sindhi (Pakistan)→52.4%R1a
Zerjal et al. (2002) found R1a1a in 64% of a sample of the Tajiks of Tajikistan
Di Cristofaro et al. (2013) found R1a1a-M198/M17 in 56.3% (49/87) of a pair of samples of Pashtuns from Afghanistan
5. Uzbekistan
1, C2 (11.5%), O2 (4.1%), N (1.4%)
2, R1a(25.1%), R1b(9.8%), J(13.4)
Mongoloid / East Asian→17%NOC
6, Turkmen Q
Haplogroup Q-M242→Native American
Haplogroup Q1→Xiongnu, Lake Baikal
Yeniseian people/Kets(central Siberia） 93.7%Q
In Siberia, the regions between Altai and Lake Baikal, which are famous for many prehistoric cultures and as the most likely birthplace of haplogroup Q
Navajo 92.3%，North American Eskimo (Inuit)-Aleut populations 80%
Chelkans 60%，Tubalar 40%-North Asia
7, Yakuts
A genetic analysis of human bone remains dating back to 6500 to 2700 BC. in the Liao area, Haplogroup N (Y-DNA) (frequently in Uralic peoples and Yakuts) was observed at 60-100%
Yakuts 88.4%N1
8, Mongolian
1, C2(53.8%), O2(10.8%), N(10.8%)
2, R1a( 9.2%), J(3.1%)
This recent study and article is published by westerners and Japanese themselves. Please ask the Japanese who published this recent article. There are Japanese sources and links to it. Based on the latest study conducted by japanese themselves, japanese are mostly descendents of kofun people. (although they are mix of jomon, yayoi and kofun people technically). The main roots of modern Japanese people are from 3 different lineages:
1) The Jōmon period hunter-gatherers and fishers. (The modern Ainu are neither a representative of the ancient Jōmon, nor their direct descendants. Jōmon are best represented by the modern Himalayan Kusunda people.
2) The Yayoi period migrants from Northeast Asia from Liao River or Amur Region (Northeast china/ Korea)
3) The Kofun period migrants from China ( Han Chinese/ Sinitic people)
These 3 population mixed to form modern day yamato japanese. The genetic input to modern day japanese from Jomon, Yayoi and Kofun people is 13% , 16% and 71% respectively.
Sources/ Link at the bottom ( articles can be found in japanese as well as english)
www.asahi.com/articles/ASP9K55ZJP9JULBJ00Z.html
www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/japanese-ancestors-came-from-three-ancient-groups-180978725/
www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/study-rewrites-understanding-modern-japans-genetic-ancestry-2021-09-17/
If these was published by Japanese themselves, then its probably the truth. I mean why would the Japanese lie about their origin? You can search it up on google or click on the link that i gave you. There is japanese and english sources to back this up.
Cool History Bros, can you cover the major battles in ancient China, those not covered by the other RUclips Channels? Those usually covered are those during the Three Kingdoms period.
Interestinly the kofun period corresponds to a period of chaos and barbarian invasion of china
Kawagoe wrote: The Han empire collapsed in AD 220. China became politically divided, with many short-lived kingdoms arising in different regions of the continent. And upon the fall of the Chin dynasty, the invasions of nomadic tribes from the north resulted in political dislocation of many clans and ethnic groups. This triggered the outflow of displaced migrants into Korea and very likely at some point, Japan, bringing with them Chinese techniques and knowledge.
[Source: Aileen Kawagoe, Heritage of Japan]
It's always interesting how Genetic Studies and Archaeology always create more questions about our past. I also find it interesting and a bit disturbing that the records from the 800's and 700 's Bce does not mention The Ainu at all. This could indicate that the part of Japan in question was occupied by migrants from the Continent and other Islands nearby and the Ainu were either displaced or absorbed into the ' Official ' Japanese Culture and people before 850 bce. Considering the region of Japan that the Ainu inhabit today and the fact that fishing in a part of Ainu Culture even today, I find it unlikely that the Ainu were not present in the parts of Japan mentioned in this video. If Ainu artifacts have been discovered in the parts of Japan featured in the video. Could they have listed under the catergory of ' Those who submitted '. and not called Ainu at the time ?. That does lend some credence to the theory of invaders riding horses especialy if there are no remains of horses found prior to that period in Japan. Could the Ainu be a victim of colonization that occured in in Japan as early as 900 bce ?. I think it would be ' Cool ' if someone discovered a diffinitive answer to that question. It might even get them the admiration of the Ainu people and that wouldn't be a bad thing to have.
nowday "Ainu" are a group of people who have retained their Jomon culture (with some effect of Yayoi and Kofun culture and language), but who were inspired by the Okhotsk culture. Thinking the "Ainu" before the Kofun period same as modern Ainu is itself a little outdated.
It is also a decades-old hypothesis that the Yayoi occupied Japan, displacing the Jomon, and that the Jomon who were driven to Okinawa and Hokkaido became the Ainu/Okinawans.
@@権兵衛-e8u The first European to study the Ainu was Josef Piłsudski's brother Bronisław Piłsudski who married an Ainu and according to the great font of knowledge Wikipedia Piłsudski's descendants currently live in Japan.
To the creator did you copy all these contents from Quora?
Because I was the one who posted this research even the images were from my post
Interesting. I don't think I have ever seen your quora post. I saw the news article on the research on twitter a while ago and just went down the rabbit hole.
@@CoolHistoryBros gotcha
You say all this as if you don’t copy other people’s content.
You forget the Austronesian-Taiwan part of Japan. Not related to any clan but should be mention if you talk about genetic here. Maybe it's worth to check out Masaman's video.
They're the Jomon people.
I find masaman's not accurate.
@@CoolHistoryBros I don't think they are the Jomon people. Nowadays if they are talking about Jomon people. They say that Ainus are descendants of the Jomon people. But they are different from Austronesian speaking Tribe. Ainus probably came from Siberia since most of them are concentrated in Northern Japan. And Austronesian are situated in Okinawa and Southern Japanese Mainland. Or Maybe Jomon is just an umbrella term for a group of Unrelated Tribes who live in Japan before the Yayoi people.
@@my_other_side473 Jomon were actually heterogeneous and some of the tribes were actually related to the Austronesian. And I think Yayoi and Austroasiatic might shares some connection. Haplogroup O-M176 and wet paddy rice agriculture were constitutionally important features of Yayoi; haplogroup O-M176 (Yayoi marker) and O-K18 (Austroasiatic marker) are both descended from O-M268, and not to mention that wet paddy rice farming is commonly practiced in Southeast Asia and Southern China (particularly among ethnic minorities).
Jomon people Ainu and Ryukyu. South Chinese have some of these blood as well.
I think it will be nice if this channel covers some recent archeological discoveries about ancient tombs found in south western tip of korean peninsula. These new findings tell a completely new and shocking possibilites of those protojaponic people lived in the Mahan statelets in the present day Kwangju Naju area. Their style of tombs predates that appeared later in the archipelago and the people lived threre seemed to be highly maritime. Evidence shows that they maintained their identity and remained autonomous even until the fall of Backje.
신기한거 알려드리겠습니다. 축복된 하루 되세요.
The Qin dynasty or Ch'in dynasty[1] ([tɕʰǐn], Chinese: 秦朝; pinyin: Qíncháo) was the first dynasty of Imperial China lasting from 221 to 206 BC. Named for its heartland in Qin state (modern Gansu and Shaanxi), the dynasty was founded by Qin Shi Huang, the First Emperor of Qin. The word Qin,pronounced “Chin” in modern tongue, gives us China’s contemporary name.
In korean Kim, or Jin.
The Emperor 's SURName was not "MIDDLE" or Chin. so MIDDLE COUNTRY... makes NO SENSE.
It was GOLD. or KIM. KIM SHI HWANG. 3 syllables. Just like a korean.
We are not simply using "Chinese names." We ARE the real China. We bow to no Emperor. Korea has lasted for thousands of years in this way. And we still do today.
Goshen is a portion of land located in North Egypt along the Nile delta described as the best land in Egypt, suitable for both crops and livestock. This is where Joseph the patriarch of the Tribe of Joseph and the Tribe Menasseh and Ephraim, married an "ASIATIC" woman in egypt (Nevermind the fact of wondering "WHERE DID THESE ASIANS COME FROM WHAT ARE THEY DOIN IN AFRICA???)
If the Septuagint reading "Gesem" is correct, the word, which in its modern Hebrew form has no known meaning, it may mean "cultivated"-comparing the Arabic root j-š-m, "to labor". Egyptologists have suggested a connection with the Egyptian word qas, meaning "inundated land." (source)
The word Joseon (조선) comes from the Joseon dynasty (also transcribed as Chosŏn or Chosun, Korean: 대조선국; 大朝鮮國, lit. 'Great Chosun Country') was a Korean dynastic kingdom that lasted for approximately five centuries. Already we can see some curious similarities between the two words Joseon and Goshen. Could these two words be somehow related?
Indeed, The letter “J” does not exist in the Hebrew alphabet. The ‘yod’ is the closest Hebrew letter and is pronounced as a “Y,” so a name like Johnathan would be pronounced Yo-nat-tan. “Jonathan” is a transliteration of the Hebrew name into English. The phonetic sound of the letter “G” is then pronounced as a “J” sound in the Hebrew language, reading Gideon as Jideon , or Gehanna (hell) is pronounced as “Jehanna.” From this phonetics we can assume a morphology of letters to represent the same sound over time, as new languages and phonetics are introduced to the culture and population by neighboring, visiting or sojourning groups of different ethnicities.
We can also infer that Goshen was probably pronounced “Joshen” or “Joseon.” Even today, in Japan a derogatory term for a Korean is “Josen-jing” meaning “man from Joshen” or a “Goshenite” - depending on the regional pronunciation used they can all sound the same. What is more, we find that the word Joseon is found as early as 700BC even in many pre-Qin dynasty (3rd century B.C.E.) texts. The meaning of this term is uncertain, but a common and using interpretation of its “borrowed” Chinese characters the name can be translated as potential meaning “morning (朝) calm (鮮)” and thus, Korea is also known as the “Land of the Morning Calm”. Though the etymological roots are contested, it is argued and often assumed that these particular characters and words were chosen to represent an “inundated or plentiful land.” - which is curiously similar to the septuagint understanding of the Hebrew word “Goshen or gesem.”
ill be writing a book or making some youtube videos to explain it all one day
@@mikeyseo Classic fantasy novel of facist korea history revisionism. You bow to cocaine, kid.
@@FF-ky3mp this dude troll pretending to be Korean I think
@@FF-ky3mp you sound like you are racist. are you racist?
Anu = 하늘 = heaven
Nak = 낙 = Fallen
Ki= 지 = Earth
anunakki . Look it up.
@@FF-ky3mp "you bow to cocaine. kid" lol what is that supposed to mean? lol
The Imperial House of Japan has ancestors from the royal family of Baekje and the royal family of Goguryeo has living descendants in Japan.
No it doesn't.
Baekje people and modern Koreans are not the same ancestor.”
Cognitive bias People can't remember things that are inconvenient lol
The genealogy of a woman named Takano Niigasa (formally Takano Ason Niigasa) who is said to be the mother of Emperor Kanmu is...
・25th Baekje King, King Muryeong 461 ・Born in Japan (Nihon Shoki) (Reign 501-523)
・Prince Junda 1st generation resident in Japan (lives in Japan as a hostage)
・Suga-kun 2nd generation resident in Japan
・Hoshi-kun 3rd generation resident in Japan
・Riki Osori 4th generation resident in Japan
・Washi Unara 5th generation resident in Japan Naturalized 1st generation (changed his name to Kazushi and naturalized in Japan)
・Washi Awakatsu 6th generation resident in Japan, 2nd generation naturalized
・Washi Jotoku 7th-generation Japanese resident, 3rd-generation naturalized
· Takesuke Kazufumi 8th generation resident in Japan 4th generation naturalized
・Kazushi Otsu, the 9th resident in Japan and the 5th naturalized (he married his daughter into the Imperial family and was given the family name of Takano)
* The child born by Takano Shinkasa (the 10th resident of Japan, the 6th naturalized) is Emperor Kanmu (the 50th emperor: reigned 781-806)
Ten generations of Baekje immigrated to Japan ten generations ago and naturalized in Japan six generations ago.
In the first place, the southern part of the Korean Peninsula was ruled by the Japanese, and the ancestors of the Chinese and Koreans were those who ruled the Yellow Sea coastal area in the north.
The Chinese and Koreans have mostly common Northern Han ancestry and fought against the Northern Equestrians with the support of Japan.
As proof, the Tang emperor called Baekje and Silla 'king', but Japan was called 'emperor' (天皇).
Maybe one of your next videos could talk about ancient trade between East Africa (Axum Empire) and Asia.
Interesting. I will look into it.
Wouldn't be more plausible that the Horserider conquest theory is compatible with the influx of "Han" DNA? The fourth century marks Goguryeo's dominance and conquest of the Xuantu and Lelang commanderies, (thus marking the rise of the Three Kingdoms of Korea) and the settlers may have spread southwards to Silla and Baekje and merged with them, as indicated from the closeness the Koreans also have with the Northern Chinese in that graph previously used.
Also note that this period also interestingly coincides with the Sixteen Kingdoms period.
Trying to understand how I have Japanese/Korean DNA from 7 generations ago when I know I have Chinese and proto-Malay lineage. Still clueless.
Is it possible the Japanese Ashina Clan is related to the Turkic Ashina? Or is just a matter of the English word being the same?
It's mostly linguistic coincidence. Like how the Hindi word for Lion is the same as the Swahili word for Lion (Simba)
The word Ashina for that Turkic clan you mentioned is a Chinese phonetical translation so the original Turkic name could be a little different.
thanks
It seems that you are missing out on the country of Korea's Balhae. Balhae is one of the ancient kingdoms of Korea after Goguryeo. I hope you can deal with it once. Thanks for your video.
Balhae is actually a Mohe people country, which is more Manchu than Korean.
@@cassiopesysg5423 No, Balhae is Korean history. The place where Balhae was located was the land of Goguryeo, and 30 years after the fall of Goguryeo, Goguryeo general Dae Jo-yeong established Balhae. King Balhae called himself King of Goryeo in diplomatic documents, and most of the ruling class in Balhae was the Go clan. After the fall of the Khitan, hundreds of thousands of Balhae people fled to Goryeo in the south. Even today, many of the Dae clan and their descendant Tae clan remain in Korea.
@@cassiopesysg5423 To hide this fact, the Chinese government is hiding the recently discovered tomb of Empress Balhae without showing it to Korean historians.
@@한량-u7k sources? Seems like Chinese data system is so weak that anybody can hack into it and get all the information
@@한량-u7k Hundreds of thousands of Han Chinese migrated to North Korea during the Qin, Han and Jin dynasty, they actually left quite a significant number of descendants in Korea, ~40% of Korean men share the same Y DNA as 70% of Han men.
Japan is 31 miles from Korea at the narrowest part of the channel that separates the Japanese island of Tsushima from South Korea's Busan town... DUH, people migrated. :)
Also differs
What a cool video.
Your video make me feel better.
I’m making videos about shrine and temple with Japanese and English subtitles.
Thank your uploading your videos
Japanese believes Hata Clan are descendants of Jewish people who came through Yutsuki, (Yuzuki) which was mentioned in your video, that they believes originally came from Kazakhstan. (Location in Eastern Kazakhstan) Japanese are Altai speakers close related to Koreans and Mongolians, (However, many Japanese looks like Kazakh) Manchurians, not Chinese at it all. There is a link that you can check by Dr. Kubo Arimasa, he wrote a books many related to 10 Lost Tribes of Israel came to JAPAN.
You mensioned that genetic does not support by genetics, Chinese either, the kaifeng Jews or any others do not have Jewish DNA. 03:04
However, many Jews have E1b1b, this is not Semitic DNA, but Hamitic. Many Jews have this DNA.
E came from DE, also Jyomon People of Japan are D.
Chinese and Koreans or Filipin do not have it.
Only Tibet, Andaman Is. and Japan in ASIA.
Arimasa Kubo said, D Haplogroups are from Manasseh and Ephraim's DNA.
Sons of Rachel's, Josephs DNA.
Bnei Menashe in India do not have Jewish DNA, they said they came from China. (Chinese do not have Jewish DNA)
This is Jared Diamond a Jew ruclips.net/video/WYFQL_JBWqs/видео.html
I like to know about the different dialects spoken for each dynasty / period
Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Mongolian, And Vietnamese all clicked up
The yellow River is where the Chinese empire was born
Not really 😅
Han originated from Central or Northern Plains.
@@jackjackyphantom8854 No, Han is a mixture of Tibeto and Sinitic peoples, tibeto from the Shannxi Regions and sinitics from the Yellow river regions.
@@weipodavid170 Tibetans have Y-haplogroup D while Han mostly belongs to Y-haplogroup O-M122 (60% or above). At least Han are pretty pure in terms of paternal lineage.
@@jackjackyphantom8854 I said tibeto not modern tibetan, half of modern Tibetan are O3a too, the same as most Han, while Han lacks D, so the likely theory is O3a went to conquer the D is tibet today. Whether those O3a were tibeto or sinitic is unsure.
The error bars are half the size of some segment on the Admixture chart. This isn't good. More data is required.
I think you are missing some of the important parts of the history. It is understandable that this is a video format therefore you wouldn't be able to cover too much details. Even in Asuka region where it is considered Japanese people's place of heart, Han(Kara) people (from three to four Korean kingdoms you mentioned) were influencing their power significantly without a doubt. "Soga" Clan is the great example that although Soga came out of nowhere in Japan, they started to take over Japanese emperor's authority in flawless progression. There are tons of leftover artifacts that almost exactly matches three Korean Kingdom's artifact such as roof tile or riding horse statue etc. Soga Clan knew how to politically manifest their power of people and manipulate Emperor's people however they wanted. Although there's no direct proof, it is highly believed to be Soga most likely originated from Han people, the ones who crossed over as the name says "Toraijin." It is easily thinkable that Japan at old times wanted Chinese goods so badly therefore they have directed traded each other. Although there are good amount of cases like that but at that time crossing the ocean all the way to China was considered quite dangerous. Therefore Japan traded Chinese goods through Korea most of the time, while Korea was hectic with establishing kingdoms etc. Because 1. it was much closer to Japan and Japan was establishing good relationship with them. 2. There were some of Chinese Clans settled in Korea called "Four Han(Chinese) Conglomerate." And Japan didn't have to go all the way to China to get Chinese goods and instead get it from them in Korea. 3. Various Toraijin Korean people were already settling in Japan, politically interconnected to the people of emperor. Japanese authoritative figures became familiar with connection to Korea by that time.
For both of them, too, each other would have been an important partner when it came to relations with China and the northern powers. Unfortunately, Japan was not able to protect Baekje... lol
The soga clan is probably not well translated, but mainstream research suggests that it was not a clan that suddenly appeared, but rather one of the clans that had previously been responsible for the management of the migratory people. It has been nearly 300 years since the arrival of the clan. I think that the fact that they had been in charge of the people for a long time in japan is the reason why they emerged at the stage of development of Japan.
At the time, the real 'Toraijin' who had the skills were employed by the old 'Toraijin' who had been in Japan for hundreds of years to undertake their occupations, so they would not have had the opportunity to influence politics.
@@imfromearth4222 That is a quite interesting story. The fact that those original Toraijins continued to take immigration from Korea like that is definitely possible story since the connection between Korea and Japan under the mainstream sceneries has been well-known case in their historical relationship. I'm not sure about Soga clan has been there nearly 300 years except knowing they have been there for a long time and have wielded their sociopolitical power greatly, they suddenly have appeared in Japanese court at around 5th century out of nowhere.
You are correct. It was difficult for Japanese to directly interact with Chinese back in those days. They mainly imported things via Korean kingdoms.
problem with "Kara" (Gaya / Gara / Garak in Korean, all 3 names are used interchangeably) is that they did not leave any written records.
So it is very difficult to figure out what their story is.
Garak (Kimhae) Kim Clan (which there are many members) claims they descended from Royal family of Gara.
There is possibility that they are descendants of Xiongnu Prince "Jin Midi" who served in Han Dynasty Court.
Wang Mang's Xin Dynasty and it's subsequent collapse may have sent Kim clan and Heo clan to escape to Korean peninsula.
@@davidjacobs8558 There is a possibility that the name Kara derived from Kaya, most likely derived from frequent contact with Fukuoka region. But from what we can find out so far, is the name Kara from reading Han 韓 character from official Japanese historical records such as Nihonshoki, as Japanese called Korea "Karakuni" in old times. As you said it is true that there aren't many directly written records left, but for now Academia is finding out their record by searching artifacts and records of Shrine diaries etc, by matching other historical records with it.
Academia has officially denied the Xiongnu Prince Jin Midi theory because 1. he was already famous figure in both China and Korea. And worshipping well-known figures was prevalent practice in both countries, such as Guanyu from Three kingdoms Romance. 2. Korea had been having intimate contact with northern arrivals for a long time. Numerous artifacts prove the majority of Korean ancestors came from north throughout various Korean kingdoms such as Buyeo. Therefore Xiongnu isn't the only one that may have indirectly influenced Korea in early Korean development. Jurchen and Xianbei for example. 3. Goryeo, Backje, Shilla all claimed certain historical figure as their ancestor. So it is not only limited to a certain country. All of the races other than Chinese wanted to be called Chinese in order to heighten their race for civilizational reason. Therefore it is taken as most likely created story that is applied to the record. 4. There has been zero symbolically Xiongnu derived artifacts or rituals found in Korea. 5. And Lastly, by the time of Jin Midi, his family has been naturalized in Han dynasty for over seven generations. And he has kept his Xiongnu tradition over 7 generations? If that is true, there should be at least single one that resembles Shilla style tomb in Han dynasty capital Xian(Changan at that time), and there hasn't been a single one found. So all we can prove so far is that various northern tribes have influenced Korea but Xiongnu isn't the only one and majority of the time it was lead by ancestral Koreans such as Buyeo and Goryeo.
Do the Chosokabe still exist?
Despite lack of historical evidence, there are all eastern asian. They obviously share similar dna unlike india, arab, africa or caucasian.
We're all different shades of yellow haha
So, basically what really set the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans apart are the culture, local customs and lifestyle. DNA and facial features are not the viable way to differentiate which one is who.
Yes, northern Han and Mongols also share related X chromosome (Female DNA inherited by both male and female descendants) but are majorly unrelated in Y chromosome (male inherited DNA only).
The northern and southern Han are basically the same in terms of male Y chromosome due to Han immigration which was brought along with the Han(Sinitic) language to the south. In terms of X chromosome (Female DNA) southern Han are ~50% Han and ~50 Baiyue, northern Han are ~14% Baiyue. So they are basically the same people, you will find much more genetic diversity amongst for example northern and southern uyghurs and many others.
Japan has three cultural groups, Ainu that.
Okay it’s a bad joke, but it was right there. I couldn’t resist. I’ll be leaving now.
They (former members) also claimed there's one more clan has now been discovered, namely Airyu Don?
Diffucult to find ainu ethnic group today. Maybe they had genocide
Well it's not really surprising that there would be some intermixing between some of the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese throughout history in East Asia.
Also different
Probably ancient Korean people came to Japan and then they developed their language into a different orientation. My korean friend said there are many common things in Korean and Japanese language, not just similar chinese words but also about the grammar and other things
Check out Alexander Vovin's From Koguryo to Tamra (2013)
grammar and sentence structure between Korean and Japanese is identical but the vocabulary (other than Chinese loan words) is very different.. this suggests a common origin that diverged over time.
China, Japan and Korea have so much shared history and heritage, but sad to say today they are very divided.
Historically, the first immigrant groups were ancient Chinese from China's mainland but they were so small size groups relatively at the time. They were the subordinates of Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of China, and they were ordered that they should find out elixir plant to extend the emperor's life and his immortal. But that was a kind of an impossible mission, so those Chinese visitors couldn't go back to their mainland to dodge Qin's huge rage and to become survivors.
And after AD.5 to 7, lots of Korean immigrant groups entered the mainland of Japan to be settlers and they were political losers' groups in the Korean peninsula, that being said. Most of them needed chances to be local lord family in Japan's inside, so they became the Japanese people who forgot their mother country and their origin. Some of those guys became the local lord of Japan's warring states so that they became perfect indigenous Japanese who were the ancestors of modern Japanese.
After those eras, a few Malaysian pirate groups entered the western territories of Japan, Kansai, and they also became Japanese people. Because back then, the central govt of Japan's governing system was only limited to the mainland of Japan, Honshu, so that they could be another settler group of Japan without any dangerous moments. However, most modern Japanese citizens have been denying the historical facts that they are the descendants of those immigrants.
The reason is so simple, which means Japan's historians don't want to accept their genetic features and their racial identities from China or the Korean peninsula and Southeast Asia. They are the race that originated from Japan's archipelago inside and they're not the descendants of ancient Chinese or Korean people, according to Japan's extreme nationalist groups.