hello, hello,I just want to use one earphone and don't want to be tired of switching devices all the time depending on the type of music. I listen to 80% classical and 20% jazz and pop. I have also seen the audeze mm500 so far, and I think the instrument part is quite good, and the vocals are in the front, so the female voice sounds good. Do you recommend other headphones at this level? I think the sound field of the mm500 is okay. For classical music, the instrument tone is not too modified. , the low-frequency dive is enough for jazz. I don’t know if I understand this right?
Finally, I’m looking for some new headphones for mixing and mastering and Audeze has caught my attention but because of their market when I’m trying to do research I’m bombarded by reviews from audiophiles not mixing engineers. Thank you for this
The MM 100 are on backorder for the longest time ever!. I own the Focal Clear MG and they sound great. I am tempted to buy the MM 100 just to have an idea of how the planar Magnetic technology sounds like.
Awesome video! How were you able to get a calibrate profile for the MM-100s? I’m thinking about getting them but don’t see a profile for them in sound ID :(
I have the MM-100 and LCX X, the MM-100 EQ very well and I find my self reaching for the MM-100 more often the the LCD X, because you can EQ them to 95% of the LCD X and they lighter / more Comfortable on your head then the LCD X
Hello, I just want to use one earphone and don't want to be tired of switching devices all the time depending on the type of music. I listen to 80% classical and 20% jazz and pop. I I think I like mm500 very much, and I think the instrument part is quite good, and the vocals are in the front, so the female voice sounds good. Do you recommend other headphones at this level? I think the Sound Stage of the mm500 is ok. For classical music, the instrument is not too modified and artificial, the low-frequency dive is enough for jazz. I'm still looking for a sound I like, maybe you can give me some advice or other information.
Today I compared the MM100 to the MM500 and I disagree with your opinion. Firstly I am not a fan of using any form of pre EQ feeding these phones to match speakers. They are both best listened to with no form of EQ present at all. It's interesting how we hear things differently. I feel the MM100 has the smiley face sound. The MM500's are way better by far at 4 times the cost. The low and high end extension is amazing (on both) but the mid range detail and presence on the MM500 is far superior to the MM100. You can hear every aspect of the mid range with the MM500. They are very close to the LCD-5 actually which cost a huge amount. Please, if you are thinking about either of these, go into a shop and listen to your best reference tracks and make up your own mind.
One question... When I'm listening to a song on RUclips, how do I identify if that song is an audio file without loss of quality or if it's an audio file with loss of quality? Where can I see the specifications of the audio being played to know if it is, for example: a “WAVE” or “FLAC” format (without loss of quality) or if it is an “MP3” type file (where there was compression and loss Of Quality)? Is there any extension for the Chrome browser that shows real-time specifications of the audio being played? I visited RUclips's audio file guidelines and it says the following... “[...] Supported file formats: (1) MP3 audio in MP3/WAV container, (2) PCM audio in WAV container, (3 ) AAC audio in MOV container and (4) FLAC audio. Minimum audio bitrate for lossy formats: 64 kbps. Minimum audible duration: 33 seconds, excluding silence and background noise. Maximum duration: none “[...]”. Therefore, RUclips accepts audio files without loss of quality and audio files with loss of quality.
Songs are often recorded between 48khz to 96khz and CDs get bounced to 44.1khz Many people have started uploading their masters at 48 32bit but when you upload to online streaming I’d say there’s more often than not some compression and loss. I’m not sure about RUclips but Spotify has started offering high fidelity streaming. But if you’re an audiophile it may be worth looking into buying vinyl or seeing if there’s a lossless copy of the song you want to listen to that you can buy 🤷
Thank you for watching! What headphones are you using?
For more info on these Headphones:
thmn.to/thoprod/565054?offid=1&affid=2206
hello, hello,I just want to use one earphone and don't want to be tired of switching devices all the time depending on the type of music. I listen to 80% classical and 20% jazz and pop. I have also seen the audeze mm500 so far, and I think the instrument part is quite good, and the vocals are in the front, so the female voice sounds good. Do you recommend other headphones at this level? I think the sound field of the mm500 is okay. For classical music, the instrument tone is not too modified. , the low-frequency dive is enough for jazz. I don’t know if I understand this right?
Finally, I’m looking for some new headphones for mixing and mastering and Audeze has caught my attention but because of their market when I’m trying to do research I’m bombarded by reviews from audiophiles not mixing engineers.
Thank you for this
The MM 100 are on backorder for the longest time ever!. I own the Focal Clear MG and they sound great. I am tempted to buy the MM 100 just to have an idea of how the planar Magnetic technology sounds like.
Awesome video!
How were you able to get a calibrate profile for the MM-100s? I’m thinking about getting them but don’t see a profile for them in sound ID :(
I have the MM-100 and LCX X, the MM-100 EQ very well and I find my self reaching for the MM-100 more often the the LCD X, because you can EQ them to 95% of the LCD X and they lighter / more
Comfortable on your head then the LCD X
Hello, I just want to use one earphone and don't want to be tired of switching devices all the time depending on the type of music. I listen to 80% classical and 20% jazz and pop. I I think I like mm500 very much, and I think the instrument part is quite good, and the vocals are in the front, so the female voice sounds good. Do you recommend other headphones at this level? I think the Sound Stage of the mm500 is ok. For classical music, the instrument is not too modified and artificial, the low-frequency dive is enough for jazz. I'm still looking for a sound I like, maybe you can give me some advice or other information.
Today I compared the MM100 to the MM500 and I disagree with your opinion. Firstly I am not a fan of using any form of pre EQ feeding these phones to match speakers. They are both best listened to with no form of EQ present at all. It's interesting how we hear things differently. I feel the MM100 has the smiley face sound. The MM500's are way better by far at 4 times the cost. The low and high end extension is amazing (on both) but the mid range detail and presence on the MM500 is far superior to the MM100. You can hear every aspect of the mid range with the MM500. They are very close to the LCD-5 actually which cost a huge amount. Please, if you are thinking about either of these, go into a shop and listen to your best reference tracks and make up your own mind.
One question... When I'm listening to a song on RUclips, how do I identify if that song is an audio file without loss of quality or if it's an audio file with loss of quality? Where can I see the specifications of the audio being played to know if it is, for example: a “WAVE” or “FLAC” format (without loss of quality) or if it is an “MP3” type file (where there was compression and loss Of Quality)? Is there any extension for the Chrome browser that shows real-time specifications of the audio being played? I visited RUclips's audio file guidelines and it says the following... “[...] Supported file formats: (1) MP3 audio in MP3/WAV container, (2) PCM audio in WAV container, (3 ) AAC audio in MOV container and (4) FLAC audio. Minimum audio bitrate for lossy formats: 64 kbps. Minimum audible duration: 33 seconds, excluding silence and background noise. Maximum duration: none “[...]”. Therefore, RUclips accepts audio files without loss of quality and audio files with loss of quality.
Songs are often recorded between 48khz to 96khz and CDs get bounced to 44.1khz
Many people have started uploading their masters at 48 32bit but when you upload to online streaming I’d say there’s more often than not some compression and loss.
I’m not sure about RUclips but Spotify has started offering high fidelity streaming. But if you’re an audiophile it may be worth looking into buying vinyl or seeing if there’s a lossless copy of the song you want to listen to that you can buy 🤷
I find it fascinating how apparently nobody is noticing/mentioning the insanely pronounced "seashell resonance" on these...
No hiciste este video en español :(
Si ruclips.net/video/gmOh8DSt188/видео.htmlsi=h2QFmSFEpmbnI7b5