If only I could legally get blasters like these (state laws are very anti-fun). Audio is a bit rough sounding though - will you consider getting a lapel/lav mic so it's easier to hear what you're saying instead of trying to hear past all of the room echo?
At the price, just buy a Harrier. One of the main complaints about the Swift is that it's too big, and the Mk4 seems to be just as big if not bigger. As someone who's fielded a 24" barrel Caliburn and the longest barrel Swift, sure a long blaster is usable, but a shorter one is way more maneuverable. Plus not smacking people and objects with your barrel is good too.
You can just not use the long barrel if you want the blaster to be more maneuverable, it only drop the fps a bit. The thing is the Harrier is pretty long too (about the same as MK4) if you want the highest performance, because you need the longer barrel. If you use short barrel for the Harrier, it will only shoot around 200ish, which the MK4 can also achieve with short barrel and stronger spring
M20 Sabre here with a long barrel, I use this and either a Frantz Foam Works Knockout inline mod or a DZ MK2 as a secondary. Probably going to buy the ziiiinc
Ikr. For that much I'd rather just get a Harrier. Don't get me wrong it's cool there's another option on the market and this is pretty much dart zone's "Harrier" but it just seems so oversized
the fact that you cannot add a scar or bcar on the ``supercharge barrel`` makes it totally obsolete. doesnt really bring anything new to the game, just yet another pump action springer...
@@atmaanu4825 it came down to performance. They tested the skinny pusher and it ended up performing worse than the normal pusher, so they redesigned the mag instead. The dartzone people posted a video explaining their design choices and why they did things the way they did, you should give it a watch, it was interesting.
@@atmaanu4825 they explained it themselves that they are prioritizing ease of long duration play time so that means priming weight/performance was kept to a minimum. A skinny pusher would have acted as a restrictor of sorts and they’d need to bump up spring weight to compensate which would result in stronger draws according to them
I'm not crazy about the unwieldy size either. Ergonomics looks decent, but trying to compete for the most expensive pro blaster is doing it wrong. Come on, DZ! Ugh
its really not that good considering the price is x3 that of a stryker, and the additional features are pretty minimal. For $120 extra dollars you're getting slightly more comfortable ergonomics, a barrel extension, scar and a few other things when you could put maybe $5 worth of spring upgrades into the stryker and hit 200 FPS.
Not 200, maybe 170, to get to 200 in a stryker takes a brass barrel and stringer spring, the mk 4 can go from 90-220 Fps super fast, I'd say It's worth it but it's not for everybody
Yeah I agree. I've a Tomcat ($70). It shoots in the 160's. Dunno if mk4.0's added $110 to get 40 more fps is worth it. Although, it does have step-down to 120 fps spring & Tomcat doesn't. Tough call. Thanks Drac! -Scopes Maverick
@@KenshinPlayz57 I put the 180fps OOD spring in my striker and a custom pvc spacer and it hits over 200. It has a scar barrel and even a skinny pusher which lowers the performance. With the spring and spacer alone I am sure you can get over 200fps.
Pretty sure the MK4 being botched on purpose because of toy regulations. Because the plunger tube of the MK4 is metal and also big (same diameter as the Swift), it can handle much more heavy spring load compared to the stock springs. My prediction is it can shoot up to 250-300 fps with beefier springs
@@randomuser-mv7bb Yes! The Dart Zone guys have confirmed on their Blaster Chat podcast that the blaster goes up to 200 fps out of the box due to regulations, but it's _built_ to be capable of going much, much higher with springs and spacers on the aftermarket. People who have gotten theirs have already taken them to 300+ fps!
This is a huge misstep for dart zone, it works but as everyone is saying, for a similar price you could get a harrier, swift, caliburn, lynx and for s bit less a trion. At this point dart zone keeps putting out the same damn thing
I would probably take this over a Harrier if I were going for something like this. I prefer the look of this, harrier gets a bit too close to real-steel profile and silhouette for me. This thing, especially with the barrel extension, looks like a scifi railgun or something. I loved how the Swift looked but heard too many issues about a few fragile internal bits and build quality. This gets me a similar look and vibe with better build quality, and a good range of performance options out of the box. Between the two springs, the barrel extension, and SCAR, seems like you can pretty easily tune up or down. $180 is quite a bit expensive and more than I'm looking to spend right now, and I've not had the opportunity to go out and actually compete. So I'm likely to stick with my Nexus, Conquest and Deuce Pros for the time being, though I am def eyeing that new X-Shot Longshot.
My issue is that for about the same price, I could get a Harrier, which would give me nylon injection-molded body with metal internals and compatibility with airsoft/real-steel stock options. For a whole lot less money I could get a Trion or the upcoming Unicorn. Any of these are a lot smaller than the mk4. I dunno if this really has a space other than as an oddity to round out the dart Zone collection. That draw is just too long and the price places it in the premium range where its value is not as compelling.
@@jaredtawater2537 It's still a great blaster despite a few minor issues but the plunger head, catch plate and priming sled are plastic not Metal. It can also missfire if bumped due to the "hair trigger" slope on the plunger catch surface.
@@dangermaus9253 It's shorthand. No blaster manufactured for resale has 100% all-metal internal parts as far as I'm aware. Most people use "all-metal" to differentiate from blasters like the Nexus Pro that have comparatively little metal overall. That said, if my inaccuracy bothered you, I apologize. I think we can agree that the quality of internal parts on the Harrier (plastic or metal) still outmatch most other blaster offerings.
@@Telefrog Shorthand is a form of writing. There are several blasters that actually use all metal internals, which of course you end up paying significantly more for. The plunger head leaves a lot to be desired even compared to something like the NP.
This makes me wonder: ehat if they made a modular system based on that barrel socket? Imagine differing lengths of working barrel, scar barrels, maybe even the cronograph-dart counter thing hasbro made that one time.
I called this when they advertised 200 fps with the strong spring. Bamboo 2.0 are still lighter than most darts at .8 grams, I think...This thing hits 175 with Af pro darts. Yes its an upgrade from the 1.2, yes u can put a stronger spring and spacer for 250 fps,(with a huge barrel and no scar option) but for $180?? Common dude, maybe take a note from the Australian lol
One word: Overpriced. The past couple years now, I've always looked at Dart Zone as the "high performance for a lower price" brand, but it seems like they're losing their way a bit. What with the Harrier and the things that X-Shot have been revealing recently, it seems like the Mk4 has no place right now.
Thanks for the review, I can't wait to see this next to a Max Stryker. I'm a smaller faom flinger at 5'4" and I am concerned this thing will look like a bazooka or the Gjallarhorn on my shoulder.
The Mk4 looks and performs awesomely well, but as a smaller guy who likes to run and shoot it seems too cumbersome. The Harrier is probably better for me.
I mean you can just not use the long attachment barrel if you want a more compact profile. With stronger spring (not stock spring) it can up to 200+ even without barrel
@randomuser-mv7bb the issue is less the overall barrel length and more of how far forward the pump length is, along with how long that stock is. People on the shorter side honestly struggle with this.
A DartZone podcast/sit down talk video thingy hinted at the use of a 20mm spacer in the MK4 and the darts that come with it are the “bamboo 2x” darts and are supposedly heavier than the bamboo 2.0s
So basically we have a worker Swift with some metal parts for $180 no thank you I'll just keep my Harrier and my kirin I mean it's much as I don't mind spending money it is a nice blaster but to me it's not $180 nice maybe when it goes on sale lol
This would have been pretty cool two years ago though some of the design choices could have been better even then. Today? swing and a miss. There is literally no reason to buy this whatsoever. There are multiple other options for the same or less money that do everything this does but better.
With the UNICORN coming soon.... I doubt this huge blaster can sell like the Nexus Pro or Stryker. Plus it's way pricier each time. With this blaster, Dart Zone has taken 2 steps back. I have 2x Nexus Pro, 2x Strykers, 1x Dictator & 1x Aeon Pro.... But the MK4 is a disappointment. Ain't planning to get one.
Regarding the mags, in a promo video Dart Zone mentioned how the Mk4's mags have skinny lips that can bend around the pusher. So standard talon mags will need the prime pulled back to be swapped.
Do the new gen mags work with the mk1? Been wanting to buy more magazines, but it is not clear on the website if they are compatible. I know the Mk1 had a proprietary magwell, so I just want to be sure they will work.
dart zone keeps making the same blasters but more expensive each time we dont need this innovate in a different way make a pro shotgun or somethin also stop making new ammo types just find one thats good and use it for everything dont make ur blasters work worst with different darts
From what I've seen out of the box; Harrier has a better build quality and can shoot harder in a more compact form. I am curious to see the modability of both blasters though in the coming months. *Edit:* Forgot to mention that Harrier can also change/replace its stock, whilst the MK4 has the spring build into the stock, unfortunately.
@@OwlskiTV all that is very true, I have a stock I wanna use on the harrier but I wanted to make sure this blaster wasn’t going to be “the next big leap” in comparison… I got 200 bucks to blow, and two blasters I could spend it on
Build quality on the Harrier is fantastic and that extends to the type of plastic used for the shell. Ergonomics are also great. Prime is the smoothest of any blaster I've handled and that's even with a return spring. I get that the silhouette is a bit realistic but that's a big part of what makes it comfortable and customizable. If that's a concern just get the orange version. The Mk.4's performance is on par with the Harrier, but it suffers from weird proportions. Stock is fixed and I don't know if the foregrip can be easily swapped. Total length might not be far off from the Harrier, but that foregrip seems to sit too far forward.
This is cool and all. But not to be a debby downer but this is basically a worker swift down to the point worker swift parts work with that blaster with little to no issue. Seems more like a swift in a different shell.
The amount of big mad comments it's fuckin hilarious. Stay mad fanbois! Having options in a market is a good thing. If it doesn't fit your needs don't get it. The fact that there are people actually going as far as saying this will be the death of dart zone just makes me laugh.
Yea but at the same time it would be nice if the options were different it also doesnt help that one of the biggest draws for dart zone pro blasters were their price and they just keep making them pricier
LordDraconical regular review. I was expecting something more deep like your old video reviews shooting the target in the backyard. Expecting to see the versus videos of from box Nexus, MK1.1/1.2, Trion, Harrier. The box presentation is amazing with custom foam. The idea of use as storage is good. For the blue version a plastic storage rifle style and DZ will just killed presentation.
It's just... sooo ugly. So big. Plus it seems that they made it to discourage custom stocks, foregrips, etc. Let's not forget that this is basically DZ's apology for last year.
Personally, this blaster is good, it competes with the harrier, while the harrier runs smoother, the Mk 4 having adjustable Fps on the fly make them even Imo, but cheaper blasters exist, Nexus and Stryker for 50, The Trion and Mk 1.2 for 80, its not bad its just for a specific market of buyers
And now with the announcement of the X Shot Longshot bull pup hitting 140 FPS at $40 there will be so many value options that the $180 price point will be a niche.
@@MichaelStroup ahh thanks. Wasn’t offended by all means, just curious to see if there was this unknown stereotype us Aussies had, perceived by others.
If you're a taller guy and the thing looks massive in YOUR hands, the thing is just too big. (that's what she said) A Stryker with a spacer and a brass barrel will do 200 fps, and a Harrier will do far more in a more ergonomic package.
The huge form factor and huge price tag is what turns me off from it. I'd rather just have a harrier. It looks cooler and has better performance out of the box including an actual skinny pusher.
I am trying to decide between the Mk4 and Harrier. I am 6”2’ so I could physically handle either of these blasters. The thing that concerns me most about the Harrier is it’s Scar Barrel. Has anyone found a different Scar that works better than the stock one and doesn’t fall off. I would probably want to use the Harrier around 190 fps. I care most about a solid feel and accuracy. What do you think is best?
The SCAR on my Harrier fits snuggly but given the complaints it seems like there's some inconsistency in manufacturing. Still, it's nothing a bit of teflon tape wouldn't fix so I wouldn't worry about it. As for the SCAR, it's good but third party options are better. Just remember that twist rate needs to match FPS. I'm running a BCAR with a 5 degree twist and at 180fps accuracy is fantastic. However, it doesn't help much with my 260fps Swift. So if you upgrade either the Harrier or Mk4 beyond stock performance the included SCAR will stop being effective.
Keep in mind you can't use a scar on the Mk4 extended barrel without modding. The Harrier is compatible with any scar or bcar designed to fit a 16mm OD barrel. As Maweitao said if the fit is a bit loose use some tape.
They better tackle bullpups next, or I don’t have much hope for Dart Zone’s future in the hobby. This blaster looks fun, but no more viable than a Dictator
"Frustration Free" packaging is really just our Corporate Landlords spending less on packaging to satisfy the bored losers crying about the environment (as they should) while at the same time giving us less stuff overall (plastic and shit)
So many tortured faces in those walls. Once you see, you can't unsee.
Those are the people who thumbs-downed drac's vids..
I’m so glad I didn’t have to look for this comment
If only I could legally get blasters like these (state laws are very anti-fun). Audio is a bit rough sounding though - will you consider getting a lapel/lav mic so it's easier to hear what you're saying instead of trying to hear past all of the room echo?
At the price, just buy a Harrier. One of the main complaints about the Swift is that it's too big, and the Mk4 seems to be just as big if not bigger. As someone who's fielded a 24" barrel Caliburn and the longest barrel Swift, sure a long blaster is usable, but a shorter one is way more maneuverable. Plus not smacking people and objects with your barrel is good too.
You can just not use the long barrel if you want the blaster to be more maneuverable, it only drop the fps a bit. The thing is the Harrier is pretty long too (about the same as MK4) if you want the highest performance, because you need the longer barrel. If you use short barrel for the Harrier, it will only shoot around 200ish, which the MK4 can also achieve with short barrel and stronger spring
Then always use a pistol? I dont want every blaster to be the same. It is nice to have a big "sniper" blaster
@@LL-wc4wn He’s talking about the case of pump action rifle style springers not pistols
M20 Sabre here with a long barrel, I use this and either a Frantz Foam Works Knockout inline mod or a DZ MK2 as a secondary.
Probably going to buy the ziiiinc
Ikr. For that much I'd rather just get a Harrier. Don't get me wrong it's cool there's another option on the market and this is pretty much dart zone's "Harrier" but it just seems so oversized
the fact that you cannot add a scar or bcar on the ``supercharge barrel`` makes it totally obsolete.
doesnt really bring anything new to the game, just yet another pump action springer...
Hey drac what do you think about this blaster when compared to other blasters in its niche like the Trion and swift or even the caliburn?
The mags themselves have been redesigned so they function like the blaster has a skinny pusher. It's super neat an really innovative.
Why would they do that? Just make a skinny pusher so that it works with talon mags
@@atmaanu4825 it came down to performance. They tested the skinny pusher and it ended up performing worse than the normal pusher, so they redesigned the mag instead. The dartzone people posted a video explaining their design choices and why they did things the way they did, you should give it a watch, it was interesting.
@@atmaanu4825 they explained it themselves that they are prioritizing ease of long duration play time so that means priming weight/performance was kept to a minimum. A skinny pusher would have acted as a restrictor of sorts and they’d need to bump up spring weight to compensate which would result in stronger draws according to them
This video proves you are the biggest pet to dartzone
Biggest for sure. Best, we shall see. 😈
💯 bro. $200 shipped won’t be winning any medals in a price competition. That’s for sure!
I'm not crazy about the unwieldy size either. Ergonomics looks decent, but trying to compete for the most expensive pro blaster is doing it wrong. Come on, DZ! Ugh
its really not that good considering the price is x3 that of a stryker, and the additional features are pretty minimal. For $120 extra dollars you're getting slightly more comfortable ergonomics, a barrel extension, scar and a few other things when you could put maybe $5 worth of spring upgrades into the stryker and hit 200 FPS.
Not 200, maybe 170, to get to 200 in a stryker takes a brass barrel and stringer spring, the mk 4 can go from 90-220 Fps super fast, I'd say It's worth it but it's not for everybody
Yeah I agree. I've a Tomcat ($70). It shoots in the 160's. Dunno if mk4.0's added $110 to get 40 more fps is worth it. Although, it does have step-down to 120 fps spring & Tomcat doesn't. Tough call.
Thanks Drac!
-Scopes Maverick
@@KenshinPlayz57 I put the 180fps OOD spring in my striker and a custom pvc spacer and it hits over 200. It has a scar barrel and even a skinny pusher which lowers the performance. With the spring and spacer alone I am sure you can get over 200fps.
Pretty sure the MK4 being botched on purpose because of toy regulations. Because the plunger tube of the MK4 is metal and also big (same diameter as the Swift), it can handle much more heavy spring load compared to the stock springs. My prediction is it can shoot up to 250-300 fps with beefier springs
@@randomuser-mv7bb Yes! The Dart Zone guys have confirmed on their Blaster Chat podcast that the blaster goes up to 200 fps out of the box due to regulations, but it's _built_ to be capable of going much, much higher with springs and spacers on the aftermarket. People who have gotten theirs have already taken them to 300+ fps!
This is a huge misstep for dart zone, it works but as everyone is saying, for a similar price you could get a harrier, swift, caliburn, lynx and for s bit less a trion. At this point dart zone keeps putting out the same damn thing
Your dad made a huge misstep making you
funn how he is not nitpicking on DZ products like everything else...
I would probably take this over a Harrier if I were going for something like this. I prefer the look of this, harrier gets a bit too close to real-steel profile and silhouette for me. This thing, especially with the barrel extension, looks like a scifi railgun or something. I loved how the Swift looked but heard too many issues about a few fragile internal bits and build quality. This gets me a similar look and vibe with better build quality, and a good range of performance options out of the box. Between the two springs, the barrel extension, and SCAR, seems like you can pretty easily tune up or down. $180 is quite a bit expensive and more than I'm looking to spend right now, and I've not had the opportunity to go out and actually compete. So I'm likely to stick with my Nexus, Conquest and Deuce Pros for the time being, though I am def eyeing that new X-Shot Longshot.
A Company that doesn't make the included scar compatible with the configuration it's most needed? Sounds like "the best".
My issue is that for about the same price, I could get a Harrier, which would give me nylon injection-molded body with metal internals and compatibility with airsoft/real-steel stock options. For a whole lot less money I could get a Trion or the upcoming Unicorn. Any of these are a lot smaller than the mk4. I dunno if this really has a space other than as an oddity to round out the dart Zone collection. That draw is just too long and the price places it in the premium range where its value is not as compelling.
Not sure why people keep saying the harrier is "all metal internals".
😅😅ik
@@jaredtawater2537 It's still a great blaster despite a few minor issues but the plunger head, catch plate and priming sled are plastic not Metal. It can also missfire if bumped due to the "hair trigger" slope on the plunger catch surface.
@@dangermaus9253 It's shorthand. No blaster manufactured for resale has 100% all-metal internal parts as far as I'm aware. Most people use "all-metal" to differentiate from blasters like the Nexus Pro that have comparatively little metal overall. That said, if my inaccuracy bothered you, I apologize. I think we can agree that the quality of internal parts on the Harrier (plastic or metal) still outmatch most other blaster offerings.
@@Telefrog Shorthand is a form of writing. There are several blasters that actually use all metal internals, which of course you end up paying significantly more for. The plunger head leaves a lot to be desired even compared to something like the NP.
Dart Zone is way Overpriced. Besides isn’t this just a Worker Swift?
Just wait till it’s 1/2 off in 6 months.. like mk3 is now only 60bucks ….. this is no more than a 100 dollar blaster..if that…
Got a coupon?
Looks decent for those who don't already have a pump action springer of that caliber.
"It's NERF or NOTHING"
Yea well "NOTHING" seems pretty damn alright
If the 5.0 is a micro flywheel pistol I will teach myself how to backflip
This makes me wonder: ehat if they made a modular system based on that barrel socket?
Imagine differing lengths of working barrel, scar barrels, maybe even the cronograph-dart counter thing hasbro made that one time.
I called this when they advertised 200 fps with the strong spring. Bamboo 2.0 are still lighter than most darts at .8 grams, I think...This thing hits 175 with Af pro darts. Yes its an upgrade from the 1.2, yes u can put a stronger spring and spacer for 250 fps,(with a huge barrel and no scar option) but for $180?? Common dude, maybe take a note from the Australian lol
One word: Overpriced. The past couple years now, I've always looked at Dart Zone as the "high performance for a lower price" brand, but it seems like they're losing their way a bit. What with the Harrier and the things that X-Shot have been revealing recently, it seems like the Mk4 has no place right now.
Thanks for the review, I can't wait to see this next to a Max Stryker. I'm a smaller faom flinger at 5'4" and I am concerned this thing will look like a bazooka or the Gjallarhorn on my shoulder.
The Mk4 looks and performs awesomely well, but as a smaller guy who likes to run and shoot it seems too cumbersome. The Harrier is probably better for me.
The Harrier is probably better for everyone.
I mean you can just not use the long attachment barrel if you want a more compact profile. With stronger spring (not stock spring) it can up to 200+ even without barrel
@randomuser-mv7bb the issue is less the overall barrel length and more of how far forward the pump length is, along with how long that stock is. People on the shorter side honestly struggle with this.
I'm not sure how much this gun is but I'd buy a swift than this one.
A DartZone podcast/sit down talk video thingy hinted at the use of a 20mm spacer in the MK4 and the darts that come with it are the “bamboo 2x” darts and are supposedly heavier than the bamboo 2.0s
So basically we have a worker Swift with some metal parts for $180 no thank you I'll just keep my Harrier and my kirin
I mean it's much as I don't mind spending money it is a nice blaster but to me it's not $180 nice maybe when it goes on sale lol
This would have been pretty cool two years ago though some of the design choices could have been better even then. Today? swing and a miss. There is literally no reason to buy this whatsoever. There are multiple other options for the same or less money that do everything this does but better.
This reminds me a lot of a worker swift
I’d love to see this with a lower profile foregrip.
With the UNICORN coming soon.... I doubt this huge blaster can sell like the Nexus Pro or Stryker. Plus it's way pricier each time.
With this blaster, Dart Zone has taken 2 steps back.
I have 2x Nexus Pro, 2x Strykers, 1x Dictator & 1x Aeon Pro....
But the MK4 is a disappointment. Ain't planning to get one.
Regarding the mags, in a promo video Dart Zone mentioned how the Mk4's mags have skinny lips that can bend around the pusher. So standard talon mags will need the prime pulled back to be swapped.
Do the new gen mags work with the mk1? Been wanting to buy more magazines, but it is not clear on the website if they are compatible. I know the Mk1 had a proprietary magwell, so I just want to be sure they will work.
realised u could fit about 10 darts in and still fire all 10. just hold the reset button and keep priming. 10 max though. so now u have a buckshot
Bro's got 770k subs but can't afford a camera while shooting on Sony Ericsson
dart zone keeps making the same blasters but more expensive each time we dont need this innovate in a different way make a pro shotgun or somethin also stop making new ammo types just find one thats good and use it for everything dont make ur blasters work worst with different darts
Once the price was revealed for this blaster, public opinion on dart zone immediately dropped.
How would you compare this to the Harrier? Since they're both roughly the same price and are trying to accomplish similar things
From what I've seen out of the box; Harrier has a better build quality and can shoot harder in a more compact form.
I am curious to see the modability of both blasters though in the coming months.
*Edit:* Forgot to mention that Harrier can also change/replace its stock, whilst the MK4 has the spring build into the stock, unfortunately.
@@OwlskiTV all that is very true, I have a stock I wanna use on the harrier but I wanted to make sure this blaster wasn’t going to be “the next big leap” in comparison… I got 200 bucks to blow, and two blasters I could spend it on
Build quality on the Harrier is fantastic and that extends to the type of plastic used for the shell. Ergonomics are also great. Prime is the smoothest of any blaster I've handled and that's even with a return spring. I get that the silhouette is a bit realistic but that's a big part of what makes it comfortable and customizable. If that's a concern just get the orange version.
The Mk.4's performance is on par with the Harrier, but it suffers from weird proportions. Stock is fixed and I don't know if the foregrip can be easily swapped. Total length might not be far off from the Harrier, but that foregrip seems to sit too far forward.
This is cool and all. But not to be a debby downer but this is basically a worker swift down to the point worker swift parts work with that blaster with little to no issue. Seems more like a swift in a different shell.
But can the swift go from 90-220 Fps in seconds during a match?
@@KenshinPlayz57 that is true
“Just get a harrier!” Mfs when they find out that this blaster is supposed to challenge the worker swift
Harrier Swift clone with a few performance upgrades vs the swift
meh another boring pump springer ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzz
I have a ?. I would like to know your favorite 3D printed blaster.
No skinny pusher and it's too big I rather run the V4 at 323 fps
I’m excited for the drop
At $180, I think I would just buy a Trion
And then x shot is like look what I can do for 30$ lol
6:51 "I'm not Australian" ??? 😂
Out of my price range for me but very nice 👌
The amount of big mad comments it's fuckin hilarious. Stay mad fanbois!
Having options in a market is a good thing. If it doesn't fit your needs don't get it. The fact that there are people actually going as far as saying this will be the death of dart zone just makes me laugh.
Yea but at the same time it would be nice if the options were different it also doesnt help that one of the biggest draws for dart zone pro blasters were their price and they just keep making them pricier
Up in Canada? Where yat!
Wow last review
LordDraconical regular review. I was expecting something more deep like your old video reviews shooting the target in the backyard. Expecting to see the versus videos of from box Nexus, MK1.1/1.2, Trion, Harrier.
The box presentation is amazing with custom foam. The idea of use as storage is good. For the blue version a plastic storage rifle style and DZ will just killed presentation.
I want more compactness/CQB from Dart Zone.
A dedicated half-length blaster like the Aeon Pro.
A Spectrum dedicated to HLs and cheaper than the MK3.
It's just... sooo ugly. So big. Plus it seems that they made it to discourage custom stocks, foregrips, etc. Let's not forget that this is basically DZ's apology for last year.
cool blaster
This reminds me of the ranger that welcom reviewed a year ago or so, God that 200 fps mega dart showing machine was, and still is a night terror
That blaster looks *WICKED* ! Gonna wanna find it!
You'll probably see me there at the Blaster Bash, very excited!!!!
Is it just me or is the magazine in Drac’s intro inserted backwards?
The Swift never looked bigger 🤣
I mean the two things I would want for this are a bigger spring and a adapter for the extra long barrel to have the scar
Wow! You've upgraded places! Nice house!
Personally, this blaster is good, it competes with the harrier, while the harrier runs smoother, the Mk 4 having adjustable Fps on the fly make them even Imo, but cheaper blasters exist, Nexus and Stryker for 50, The Trion and Mk 1.2 for 80, its not bad its just for a specific market of buyers
And now with the announcement of the X Shot Longshot bull pup hitting 140 FPS at $40 there will be so many value options that the $180 price point will be a niche.
it competes with the harrier?
the mk4 doesnt even compare favourably with the worker swift it was based on. it is a functionally worse swift.
Lord Drac. Great review for a pretty cool blaster.
Thanks Drac and have fun flinging in Denver!
It kinda reminds me of the halo smg
man i wish that i had this during jebb
Im trying to figure out the inside joke about not being australian
Sniper from team fortress 2. One of the most famous video game snipers. He's Australian.
@@MichaelStroup ahh thanks. Wasn’t offended by all means, just curious to see if there was this unknown stereotype us Aussies had, perceived by others.
@@malcolmr8348 you good homie. I didn't think you were. Not everyone one knows the joys that was TF2.
That looks amazing
did you move?
Can you run the barrel extension and the scar barrel?
No. That would have made sense.
Hi
If you're a taller guy and the thing looks massive in YOUR hands, the thing is just too big. (that's what she said) A Stryker with a spacer and a brass barrel will do 200 fps, and a Harrier will do far more in a more ergonomic package.
The huge form factor and huge price tag is what turns me off from it. I'd rather just have a harrier. It looks cooler and has better performance out of the box including an actual skinny pusher.
I am trying to decide between the Mk4 and Harrier. I am 6”2’ so I could physically handle either of these blasters. The thing that concerns me most about the Harrier is it’s Scar Barrel. Has anyone found a different Scar that works better than the stock one and doesn’t fall off. I would probably want to use the Harrier around 190 fps. I care most about a solid feel and accuracy. What do you think is best?
The SCAR on my Harrier fits snuggly but given the complaints it seems like there's some inconsistency in manufacturing. Still, it's nothing a bit of teflon tape wouldn't fix so I wouldn't worry about it.
As for the SCAR, it's good but third party options are better. Just remember that twist rate needs to match FPS. I'm running a BCAR with a 5 degree twist and at 180fps accuracy is fantastic. However, it doesn't help much with my 260fps Swift. So if you upgrade either the Harrier or Mk4 beyond stock performance the included SCAR will stop being effective.
@@maweitao Thank you for your input, I very much appreciate it!
Keep in mind you can't use a scar on the Mk4 extended barrel without modding. The Harrier is compatible with any scar or bcar designed to fit a 16mm OD barrel. As Maweitao said if the fit is a bit loose use some tape.
They better tackle bullpups next, or I don’t have much hope for Dart Zone’s future in the hobby. This blaster looks fun, but no more viable than a Dictator
the mk4 is like the dart zone caliburn
they saw that it was so popular they decided to make their owned
"Frustration Free" packaging is really just our Corporate Landlords spending less on packaging to satisfy the bored losers crying about the environment (as they should) while at the same time giving us less stuff overall (plastic and shit)
I'm still thinking of going with a Lynx, but this is looking really nice. One of these days though, I'mma bite on a Lynx.
The day they learn to double stack mags...
*sells liver* YaY i CaN fInNalLy BuY A
nEfr RiPoFf1!!11111!!
Did your channel get shadowbanned?