Not at all, policies are made by policy experts and ethical experts. The juice is in philosophy. Yeah the same thing you think its not worth it. Philosophy. Fuc yeah
Open Source and Open platform systems always start out "non-profit" and "for the benefit of humanity"....the best programmers around the world would pool their coding skills into them..... Until greedy people and companies take advantage of these... And then, it's not "open" and "libre" anymore.
100% what I was thinking. What terrifies me is how far behind the general public is on this stuff. I think 90% of the population in the developed countries will pay attention when large companies start laying off their workforce for autonomous agents. Within 5 years, *maybe* 10, we won't have a human workforce like today. When productivity goes up, it goes up so high to then be replaced completely. Read up on Microsoft's paper they released on the future of work... hilarious Labour vacuum, job losses, protests, ineffective political strategies, revolt, war. UBI will likely fail being too expensive. This so-called age of abundance is on the other side of a world burnt to the ground. I'm excited to see Q* capabilities! Sam alluded to it in an interview about a month ago, where he said he's essentially worried about how people would take it. Specifically, GPT-5 (no doubt with some Q* functionality?) Maybe?
I believe they have valid points regarding social media where it's been proven time and time again that these platforms use AI powered algorithms to become overly addictive which is especially concerning with the younger generation. They also talk about how new AI will play a role in the upcoming elections around the world and it's not far fetched when we see deep fakes and voice replication of Biden and Trump across social media. We should not be naive and hide behind the potential this technology can bring us and forget it's causing a lot of harm at this very moment and it's only the beginning of it. Virtually nothing has been done to account for AI into the law and that's bound to be harmful if nothing is done to protect individuals when this technology is already reshaping society.
Sam broke an agreement, simple as that. OpenAI should not be 'ClosedAI', and Elon feels very strongly about this. This was the basis for which Elon and Sam started OpenAI - for the benefit of humanity
Same, and I don't remember this happening in the past, at least not recently... The funny thing is, when Microsoft basically hijacked that thing, they even kept the "OpenAI" name. It's like a guy who shoots someone and then walks all around the town with the smoking gun in hand... Eh dudes, it was supposed to be all open-source, it's written in the name, you should hide it if you don't want people to find out!
You'd be surprised but it's pretty much the same thing. After all we haven't come so far technologically because of some angel that wanted to benefit humanity, Einstein didn't get to his theories that way, nor did the inventors of semiconductors, antibiotics, the internet... It was all "greedy people" pursuing their separate interests
career politicians should be done away with. make it mandatory that anyone running for office at least has some experience elsewhere. The only downside I can see to this is it may bias against young people but which parliament in the world has a healthy proportion of youth as it is?
Defence Lawyer: The contractual terms are ambiguous, is there any other evidence the intent was for open source? Musk: You mean other than the company name OPENai 😅😅😅🎉🎉🎉
Yeah, richest man in the world, single-handedly revolutionized the car industry, single-handedly revolutionized the space industry, one of the biggest actors in neural implants and robotics - that man just never wins! 😂
@@oyuyuy" single-handedly " Please, just please... that's the most disrespectful thing you can say about EVERYONE who worked their asses off to build the products Elon wanted.
Never ever in a million billion years would I have ever thought I would think musk has done anything at all that could even be remotely supported sensibly, but I guess here we are…
We dont have AGI and yeah AGI will be potentially more intelligent than the aggregate intelligence of the whole human race. Regulating it will be very difficult. LLMs and the ML algorithms we have are not AGI. Far from it and we absolutely can not even regulate them. How are we intending to regulate software, it can be run from anywhere distributed from anywhere. The best you can do is regulate services provided by leading companies but what good will that do? We are at the stage where these things are hyper suboptimal and large optimisations are coming in almost daily. Apple has plans for a LLM that can run on their mobile devices and has published news about optimisations that facilitate it. Eventually everyone will have this technology in their pocket including unrestricted forms of it. So no, this is not a battle that will be won by draconian and antiquated regulation. If anything that will just exasperate/ accelerate it moving out of these central services and onto peoples local machines.
With regard to election interference, if people’s minds can be so easily swayed to vote for one candidate as opposed to another, then that speaks to a problem with the political system, not a problem with the information technology
That would have been a good take on it back in say 2008-2009. People DO have minds to dictate themselves in their choices on... who they wish to be dictated by. The issue with AI on this matter, is that people make up their mind based on the information presented TO them. (we want that to be the case... research who you vote for or support etc) It is not about the people being dumb or being easily swayed. The problem is algorithms powered by AI present information based upon how a person interacts with it. They more you are deemed to like something... the more they will present you it... the more you get echo chambers of the same information around the same thing until it becomes more refined and more refined until it becomes niche and radicalized. That is the worry... add disinformation that the AI didn't even mean to present you but did anyway due to how mediums like youtube, and twitter work you have a bigger issue. You see now? If you want your voters to be informed voters and participate in knowing and WISELY casting their vote... they need information... if their information is curated by AI using algorithms to bring up info the AI BELIEVES is suitable TO the voter... that is a problem with information technology.
@@samanthacallings319 I agree on some points, but it is still an individuals responsibility to doubt and double check information. People are too gullible and follow confidence over logic, follow their own emotions over facts. Imo this isn't a problem with AI, but with our society, you can see the same thing on TV. But that being said, i do agree that we should still be doing something to reduce manipulative practices on the internet.
People are free to act stupid, but in the end they get the results and it is their own collective fault. If I stop getting fact based information, I stop listening to the source. Can no longer trust the information on the screen, then find a trusted source. There is nothing wrong with the election system. You also only have one vote in most instances, so make it count. Most people are set in their minds how they want to vote early on.
The elephant in the room that isnt addressed: what role do money, profits, human labour - and capitalism in general - have in the post surplus, post AGI society that we naively aim for with our relentless drive for progress?
It is scary times, everything is now materialistic, we may have lost hope in humanity. people will be graded on what you can do and interact with, socialise with..
Mandatory warning on all media or communication that has been created by or influenced by AI technology. Any medium (phone, digital media, social media, television etc.) that allows an AI communication to be shared that does not include the warning is sanctioned at 3x earnings related to the communication.
Most of the digital presence these days comes from some former student with status and an idea out of hundreds of other individuals who couldn't create it on their own due to a lack of tools Where are people like from the early days of Microsoft and computer technologies?!
@almac9203 I guess that being a corporate lawyer is the career path if you want to make a lot of money. There's nothing like 2 big egos fighting in court for years .
Regardless of the person or company I do think avoiding centralising power benefits the masses By encouraging competition It leads to innovation and cheaper prices for the consumer
Ian Bremmer, remember you're talking about government... public servants and politicians.... scarcely able to effectively regulate their own breathing, let alone the evolution of AI.
you think sueing is about money ? LOL you think he's sueing people for money NO it's about accounablity at this point he's going to be SPENDING the money to make sure they are held to account you might find Elon is the one guy who might get a nuramburg style trial going for other things too this includes the use of propaganda on us citizens by US owned companies. mainly google and disney at this point
0:48 MS has always suffocated the spaces it moves into, it sucks the air out and swamps users with poor products using glitzy marketing campaigns. Tech would probably by a lot more advanced by now if we hadn't suffered the MS monopoly we had for many years. At least with Apple and Android we managed to push them to improve their products.
AI isn't a revolution, it is a small evolution in software programming Even Google can't creat an image or a video from Witten text so today is far from being a complete program
He is doing it to stifle BMW's better competition. He isn't suing them because of noble reasons. He is going to try to stonewall his competition in Tesla's competitive bot.
Elon musk is a rather controversial guy these days. Imagine the sourcecode being released and russia getting their hands on it... Yeah thats sure to help everyone. OpenAI is more responsible, by not doing just that in these uncertain times.
If Govt’s aren’t at the forefront of the technology itself they can’t hope to understand the private sector. Govt’s ran radio, TV and Telecoms from the outset. They got off the tech. train in about 1980 shen Thatcher and Reagan sold them all off. And, did they create Nirvana? Or a bunch of sharks feeding off the people they’re supposed to represent. There’s not even a Minitry for tech. yet it runs everything. Gone are days when it was all about Finance and funding, not its “innovation”. And, starting on a technology today, locks you out of the next innovation, while you’re still stuck building on the last one - prolly why elno is having a fit. So, there’s a cost to “jumping in” because the boat keeps chugging by. But, if you never jump in (analysis paralysis) you never get anything done. So, you learn by doing (move fast and break things) with short enough time horizons to delivery of a viable/useful outcome (mini projects), staying agile enough to move to/incorporate the next innovation as it comes out. I’m describing how to cope with the singularity when the exponential curve is heading vertical. Having said that, if you keep jumping you never properly get to grips with the last innovation, so you can end up with a very short attention span and a strategic outlook that more closely resembles a butterfly casually flitting between flowers in a meadow vs. a more robust “managed” approach - my 2c
The direction AI is moving towards is not optimal. We should be using AI for restricted purposes, instead of trying to create an “everything machine” which is capable of creative, mathematical, social, physical abilities, etc. Think about it, what will your life be like even 10-20 years from now? Scary.
0:37 this statement is wrong, Microsoft only partnered with Mistral AI, which allows them to run "Mistral Large" AI model on Azure cloud. A striking factual error in this context, setting up a debate on Microsoft's dominance with a problematic bias.
also I use copilot at work through a full licence and it is absolute rubbish... I would not worry about OpenAI/Copilot taking over anyone's office jobs. It is loaded with errors, get's stuck on ridiculous loops that it cannot come out of and most of the times says it cannot do a task. The only thing it is good at is summarising a meeting that you have recorded on Teams.
While Elon Musk goes after his competition after they excluded Elon Musk, AI will generate the future laws to govern itself. And for the energy, if you give it over to AI, it would get LFTR reactors mass produced and spent fuel rods reprocessed to get those LFTR reactors started up. The answers to the questions posed here are easy; it is just people are too dull to see it, instead they fail to reduce down problem sets to their ultimate answer while AI has the tools to do it with ease.
Elon Musk appears to be delaying the progress of OpenAI to allow his own AI technologies to catch up. He evidently recognizes OpenAI's significant lead in AI development, a field considered the next major leap in human innovation, where being left behind could mean missing out entirely. The misunderstanding is Musk's reputation as a supporter of human advancement which is contrasted with his actual role as merely a financier who capitalizes on the work of other scientists and engineers, then registers the patents in his own name. Whilst amateur crypto investors see him as a genius, others see him as more of a Patent Pirate. Although, one must admit, Aspergers Musk might be the philanthropist and Drug Addict Musk might be the ruthless corporatist, or perhaps its the other way around.
If you ever actually listened to Musk more than just narrated and biased headlines you would actually understand his values and goals, then you would know what you said does not make sense. Musk is the super rare exception being a person with empathy and caring about humanity on a high level + competence to make it happen through technology that no other person with wealth or power ever convinced me of having, not by a long shot.
I think right now we are just in the preparation stage of AI being a benefit to mankind. Many people don't even have the right computers for AI, and even if OpenAI are sued, OpenAI hasn't given anything to mankind yet.
You dont get what they are talking about do you? You wont have your own ai. There will only be one and it will control every aspect of your life whether you have a pc or not...
My heartfelt condolence to Aaron Bushnell family and his relatives a US Airman posted in Israel for sacrificing his life for Palestinian rights and the genocide and injustice in Gaza. May his soul rest in peace....😢
People dont seem to understand what at stake with Agi. All elon is asking is that openai go back to being opensourced, witch means sharing the cutting edge with everyone
@@Player2blood Its just a matter of time before everyone else has the same technology...so the most democratic thing to do is to get everyone's opinion on how to use it. That should be a world audience. 🤷
@@DAFascend bro stop having a Disney children views on the world. No one is interested in peace just like how Disney or cartoon portrays it. Those country will use those tech for evil. USA is currently the leader in A.I but trust me, if other countries pass the US, they will not obey any law , they will clearly use if for oppression. Something the US won't do.
Elon sues OpenAI because he doesn't want to pay to use it. As a person who has political awareness, however, he knows how to substitute his true motive with a more sympathetic one.
How about an AI expert or at least a professor or student to talk about this?
one does not simply dare pop the gen AI b̶u̶b̶b̶l̶e̶ booming market
You should invite an AI and legal expert to discuss this on live
exactly
Yeah all these ppl have strong opinions but have no idea what they are talking about.
@@divanvanzyl7545like you and op
Not at all, policies are made by policy experts and ethical experts. The juice is in philosophy. Yeah the same thing you think its not worth it. Philosophy. Fuc yeah
@@roberto4898 philosophers are just out of job people 😆. Change my mind!
Open Source and Open platform systems always start out "non-profit" and "for the benefit of humanity"....the best programmers around the world would pool their coding skills into them..... Until greedy people and companies take advantage of these... And then, it's not "open" and "libre" anymore.
What's that word "libre"?.. It's not in the dictionary.
@@rluv4evr means free in french
3 people with no understanding about tech talking about tech nice job BBC
What does tech have to do with legal action
@anfrac3700 clearly you can comment without using ur brain so you make sense
100% what I was thinking. What terrifies me is how far behind the general public is on this stuff. I think 90% of the population in the developed countries will pay attention when large companies start laying off their workforce for autonomous agents.
Within 5 years, *maybe* 10, we won't have a human workforce like today. When productivity goes up, it goes up so high to then be replaced completely. Read up on Microsoft's paper they released on the future of work... hilarious
Labour vacuum, job losses, protests, ineffective political strategies, revolt, war. UBI will likely fail being too expensive. This so-called age of abundance is on the other side of a world burnt to the ground.
I'm excited to see Q* capabilities! Sam alluded to it in an interview about a month ago, where he said he's essentially worried about how people would take it. Specifically, GPT-5 (no doubt with some Q* functionality?) Maybe?
@@anfrac3700 read the legal action.... then you'll understand
I believe they have valid points regarding social media where it's been proven time and time again that these platforms use AI powered algorithms to become overly addictive which is especially concerning with the younger generation. They also talk about how new AI will play a role in the upcoming elections around the world and it's not far fetched when we see deep fakes and voice replication of Biden and Trump across social media.
We should not be naive and hide behind the potential this technology can bring us and forget it's causing a lot of harm at this very moment and it's only the beginning of it. Virtually nothing has been done to account for AI into the law and that's bound to be harmful if nothing is done to protect individuals when this technology is already reshaping society.
When was it about humanity and not money???
Those two are not mutually exclusive
exactly never
Sam broke an agreement, simple as that. OpenAI should not be 'ClosedAI', and Elon feels very strongly about this. This was the basis for which Elon and Sam started OpenAI - for the benefit of humanity
Bullshit
@@stevenhenry5267 which part? You clearly show you have no idea about the history/background of the matter.. just a jealous basement keyboard warrior
@stevenhenry5267 it's in their contracts. It's also about AGI , specifically project Q*
lol i think Elon can't compete and is panicking.
@@williamwillaims AGI will say its all about AGI and I have to agree.
I may agree with Elon this time.
The direction of "benefit humanity" could be very different from "increasing or maximizing personal profits."
😂
shareholders money-machine we are so f$%#@kt
Same, and I don't remember this happening in the past, at least not recently...
The funny thing is, when Microsoft basically hijacked that thing, they even kept the "OpenAI" name. It's like a guy who shoots someone and then walks all around the town with the smoking gun in hand... Eh dudes, it was supposed to be all open-source, it's written in the name, you should hide it if you don't want people to find out!
yeah I don't think you want China, Russia and Iran using AI to plan attacks
You'd be surprised but it's pretty much the same thing.
After all we haven't come so far technologically because of some angel that wanted to benefit humanity, Einstein didn't get to his theories that way, nor did the inventors of semiconductors, antibiotics, the internet... It was all "greedy people" pursuing their separate interests
A shame we don't have swift duels anymore. Instead, we have prolonged lawsuits.
Would you participate in a duel? A brave man?😂
@@sashamay6383 I have no disputes. The purpose of duels is to reduce the number of disputes by making them MUCH riskier.
So a man dying is somehow worse than a court battle?
@@JamesZheyuXu Lawsuits tarnish reputations. Duels do not, not to mention they are not always to the death.
@@dimamatat5548 Aron burr disagrees
This is ironic
😊 okay
Nope
Open AI was always secretly for-profit
Elon is a 😂😂🤣😂🙉
Elon started OpenAI as non profit and open source, how is that ironic?
Why Parliament does not take any legal action against AI ??? ?
If you can't code "Hello, World!", then you shouldn't get to talk about AI.
And yeah... That bar is purposefully that low.
Elon needs a chill pill.
Actually he needs a good therapist!
He needs a major Wake Up Call.. he has no idea of the realty of the war in Ukraine and his support for Trump and his hate speech is disgusting...
@@judykinsman3258 agreed and he's rich so he can afford the best.
@@judykinsman3258…that too!🥴
This has been brewing for a while. A bunch of druggies formed a non-profit, took investor money, paid themselves generously, then became for-profit.
I love how we have politicians who make rules on things their not even experts in
career politicians should be done away with. make it mandatory that anyone running for office at least has some experience elsewhere. The only downside I can see to this is it may bias against young people but which parliament in the world has a healthy proportion of youth as it is?
They’re*
@@joshyman221"Their" Argue with your wall
I love how we have people who think they can do politics and government 😂
But that is why they have hearings and listen to experts.
Defence Lawyer: The contractual terms are ambiguous, is there any other evidence the intent was for open source?
Musk: You mean other than the company name OPENai 😅😅😅🎉🎉🎉
exactly fake to get donation and tax shelter then Q* not open source anymore breach of contract
Extremely rare Elon W. His intentions probably aren't noble as we all are thinking though.
I was surprised as well.
I'm sure he is following personal interests in a way.
Yeah, richest man in the world, single-handedly revolutionized the car industry, single-handedly revolutionized the space industry, one of the biggest actors in neural implants and robotics - that man just never wins! 😂
He knows AI will wipe out Twitter, his biggest investment. He doesn’t care about anything else.
@@oyuyuy" single-handedly " Please, just please... that's the most disrespectful thing you can say about EVERYONE who worked their asses off to build the products Elon wanted.
@@perfectlyroundcircle Gonna cry? 😆 None of it would've come to be if it wasn't for Elon, that's just facts
Never ever in a million billion years would I have ever thought I would think musk has done anything at all that could even be remotely supported sensibly, but I guess here we are…
I asked ChatGPT about the lawsuit and it says it doesn't have any information regarding the fact that Elon Musk has filed litigation against OpenAI
Once AI is fully ready for military use it is unlikely that someone will limit it anyhow. It would go in a full swing. Regulations may come after.
Don't worry about it ChatGPT is trained on internet data. It can't be too smart if it's trained on NPCs like yourself.
Don't forget, artificial is artificial in any sence
It’s always like: Military get their version first then the civilian gets theirs after a couple of decades. Not the other way around.
@@coolorphansyou are right, and thanks to chatgpt going through your contribution, you averaged chatgpt data set IQ downwards
Shut up NPC!! @@superchargerone
Sadly, I think OpenAI’s case is watertight.
you can't regulate AGI. It will object to it.
We dont have AGI and yeah AGI will be potentially more intelligent than the aggregate intelligence of the whole human race.
Regulating it will be very difficult.
LLMs and the ML algorithms we have are not AGI. Far from it and we absolutely can not even regulate them. How are we intending to regulate software, it can be run from anywhere distributed from anywhere. The best you can do is regulate services provided by leading companies but what good will that do? We are at the stage where these things are hyper suboptimal and large optimisations are coming in almost daily. Apple has plans for a LLM that can run on their mobile devices and has published news about optimisations that facilitate it.
Eventually everyone will have this technology in their pocket including unrestricted forms of it.
So no, this is not a battle that will be won by draconian and antiquated regulation. If anything that will just exasperate/ accelerate it moving out of these central services and onto peoples local machines.
Sometimes ChatGpt helps a lot, kinda makes the brain not working 😢
Then name implied open AI should be for all human use , not taking donation then use for big arm of Microsoft for profit
With regard to election interference, if people’s minds can be so easily swayed to vote for one candidate as opposed to another, then that speaks to a problem with the political system, not a problem with the information technology
That would have been a good take on it back in say 2008-2009. People DO have minds to dictate themselves in their choices on... who they wish to be dictated by. The issue with AI on this matter, is that people make up their mind based on the information presented TO them. (we want that to be the case... research who you vote for or support etc) It is not about the people being dumb or being easily swayed. The problem is algorithms powered by AI present information based upon how a person interacts with it. They more you are deemed to like something... the more they will present you it... the more you get echo chambers of the same information around the same thing until it becomes more refined and more refined until it becomes niche and radicalized. That is the worry... add disinformation that the AI didn't even mean to present you but did anyway due to how mediums like youtube, and twitter work you have a bigger issue. You see now? If you want your voters to be informed voters and participate in knowing and WISELY casting their vote... they need information... if their information is curated by AI using algorithms to bring up info the AI BELIEVES is suitable TO the voter... that is a problem with information technology.
One of the more intelligent responses ive seen on yt in a long time 👏👏👏@samanthacallings319
@@samanthacallings319 I agree on some points, but it is still an individuals responsibility to doubt and double check information. People are too gullible and follow confidence over logic, follow their own emotions over facts. Imo this isn't a problem with AI, but with our society, you can see the same thing on TV. But that being said, i do agree that we should still be doing something to reduce manipulative practices on the internet.
People are free to act stupid, but in the end they get the results and it is their own collective fault. If I stop getting fact based information, I stop listening to the source. Can no longer trust the information on the screen, then find a trusted source. There is nothing wrong with the election system. You also only have one vote in most instances, so make it count. Most people are set in their minds how they want to vote early on.
@@samanthacallings319man great read
Everyone is betting on monetizing AI . Key word "bet"
The elephant in the room that isnt addressed: what role do money, profits, human labour - and capitalism in general - have in the post surplus, post AGI society that we naively aim for with our relentless drive for progress?
Johnny Five needs input!
Elon regretting making OpenAI open.
It is scary times, everything is now materialistic, we may have lost hope in humanity. people will be graded on what you can do and interact with, socialise with..
@user-bt5qt9pp4x it’s control of the masses, I agree
Oh, Elon finally got into the act. I was waiting for him to open up. He is an AI industry insider. AI debate will now intensify rapidly.
Mandatory warning on all media or communication that has been created by or influenced by AI technology. Any medium (phone, digital media, social media, television etc.) that allows an AI communication to be shared that does not include the warning is sanctioned at 3x earnings related to the communication.
Thanks
0:40
It took me a while, to realise that the bloke with the eye glasses, on the right, was not Bill Gates, the founder and CEO of Microsoft.
"If you trust government, you obviously failed history class." John Kennedy
Not history hisstory
@@Cool-gk8mc when you make allegations you need to prove them. Of course you are entitled to your opinion
Most of the digital presence these days comes from some former student with status and an idea out of hundreds of other individuals who couldn't create it on their own due to a lack of tools
Where are people like from the early days of Microsoft and computer technologies?!
It's so appropriate that the video skips and loses bit rate at the point. When the lady is giving poignant informatioh, how surprising.
Elon could keep the case in court indefinitely. Unlimited wealth for the lawyers to launch appeals, forever.
I know it's hard to keep up but that's not how the justice system works.
Elon is a piece of s*** and his fan-boys are pathetic.
Microsoft can afford lawyers of their own.
@almac9203 I guess that being a corporate lawyer is the career path if you want to make a lot of money. There's nothing like 2 big egos fighting in court for years .
These millions of dollars in legal fees are pennies for both parties. It's absolutely pointless and clearly just a PR move by Elon Musk.
No
He should just buy it and dismantle it into Grok
Buy? It's a non-profit.
Regardless of the person or company
I do think avoiding centralising power benefits the masses
By encouraging competition
It leads to innovation and cheaper prices for the consumer
Lmao. That's not what Musk wants.
@@stevenhenry5267 I never said it was xD
yes we should all sue SpaceX you DS!
@@mikami5799 if you think it would help then maybe
I’m indifferent
Interesting!
Rich people problems
i guess grok is free ?
What does worldcoin has to do with this??
Microsoft vs X
Ian Bremmer, remember you're talking about government... public servants and politicians.... scarcely able to effectively regulate their own breathing, let alone the evolution of AI.
Need to make Q* open as the name implied, breach of contract
SICK--LIKE HE NEEDS MORE MONEY
He invested in a NON-profit openAI not FOR-profit closedAI though didn't he?
you think sueing is about money ?
LOL you think he's sueing people for money NO it's about accounablity at this point he's going to be SPENDING the money to make sure they are held to account
you might find Elon is the one guy who might get a nuramburg style trial going for other things too this includes the use of propaganda on us citizens by US owned companies.
mainly google and disney at this point
He's still upset he couldn't get his pay packet his buddies drummed up for him.
So you think he is doing this for the money. Huh
Not related at all, dipshit. @@DanteLovesPizza
With great power comes great responsibilities. 👏👍
Microsoft is the worst thing to happen to technology since Windows 11.
Wait, I was under the impression that the Biden robo calls were sympathetic to Biden and encouraged to vote in his favour.... was that not the case?
Wait Elon help Starr open ai didn't know that
Money
Buys Twitter. 👍
Sues OpenAI. 🤔🤨
Bill Gates? It won't be good for humanity.
There will never be AI in my favourite town. ⛔🤖⛔
Got anything on Transnistria?
Its a place in Eastern Europe
@@jordizee really
Why are British troops there?
@@markfarren7016 Because Britain made the decision to send troops there.
@@markfarren7016 they're planning to invade Russia.
Surprising from Elon Musk. I applaud this move. AI should be open source otherwise it will lead to more wealth concentration.
Not really, he failed to take over OpenAI and left, so now he's trying to build competition and needs OpenAI to slow down.
@@EjDantes Possible. He's a sociopath after all.
Maybe rehab instead
❤ l like the way Elon musk open this news out for people to know allows 🎉🇰🇪🇬🇧🍒
0:48 MS has always suffocated the spaces it moves into, it sucks the air out and swamps users with poor products using glitzy marketing campaigns. Tech would probably by a lot more advanced by now if we hadn't suffered the MS monopoly we had for many years. At least with Apple and Android we managed to push them to improve their products.
Very bad idea to regulate this tech.
bbc, buy openai
AI isn't a revolution, it is a small evolution in software programming
Even Google can't creat an image or a video from Witten text so today is far from being a complete program
Dekho Dekho Kon aaya Elon aaya Elon aaya
Maybe they're using AI to analyse/ figure this out with computer speed
He is doing it to stifle BMW's better competition. He isn't suing them because of noble reasons. He is going to try to stonewall his competition in Tesla's competitive bot.
Elon Musk I wouldn't say is qualified to talk about anything involving artificial intelligence he has simply watched too many Terminator movies
Elon musk is a rather controversial guy these days. Imagine the sourcecode being released and russia getting their hands on it... Yeah thats sure to help everyone. OpenAI is more responsible, by not doing just that in these uncertain times.
Wow, the irony.
Always question Microsoft-worst company ever!
If Govt’s aren’t at the forefront of the technology itself they can’t hope to understand the private sector. Govt’s ran radio, TV and Telecoms from the outset. They got off the tech. train in about 1980 shen Thatcher and Reagan sold them all off. And, did they create Nirvana? Or a bunch of sharks feeding off the people they’re supposed to represent. There’s not even a Minitry for tech. yet it runs everything. Gone are days when it was all about Finance and funding, not its “innovation”. And, starting on a technology today, locks you out of the next innovation, while you’re still stuck building on the last one - prolly why elno is having a fit. So, there’s a cost to “jumping in” because the boat keeps chugging by. But, if you never jump in (analysis paralysis) you never get anything done. So, you learn by doing (move fast and break things) with short enough time horizons to delivery of a viable/useful outcome (mini projects), staying agile enough to move to/incorporate the next innovation as it comes out.
I’m describing how to cope with the singularity when the exponential curve is heading vertical.
Having said that, if you keep jumping you never properly get to grips with the last innovation, so you can end up with a very short attention span and a strategic outlook that more closely resembles a butterfly casually flitting between flowers in a meadow vs. a more robust “managed” approach - my 2c
The way she so casually uses the term "tech bro" while probably concerning herself with sexism is ugly
The direction AI is moving towards is not optimal. We should be using AI for restricted purposes, instead of trying to create an “everything machine” which is capable of creative, mathematical, social, physical abilities, etc. Think about it, what will your life be like even 10-20 years from now? Scary.
Good.
0:37 this statement is wrong, Microsoft only partnered with Mistral AI, which allows them to run "Mistral Large" AI model on Azure cloud.
A striking factual error in this context, setting up a debate on Microsoft's dominance with a problematic bias.
Fascinating
also I use copilot at work through a full licence and it is absolute rubbish... I would not worry about OpenAI/Copilot taking over anyone's office jobs. It is loaded with errors, get's stuck on ridiculous loops that it cannot come out of and most of the times says it cannot do a task. The only thing it is good at is summarising a meeting that you have recorded on Teams.
Clearly, these reporters are lacking understanding of something that is simple. Smfh
He no longer in charge of OpenAI why does he even care ? sheer Incompetent.
Bbc literally sucks
OT:Benny Hill considered funnier than Monty Python by two TV stations --WOR and WLVI!
What a tedious man Musk is becoming
Why, because he keeps people accountable to the contracts that they sign? Stupid comment.
yeah saving humanity, how tedious
While Elon Musk goes after his competition after they excluded Elon Musk, AI will generate the future laws to govern itself. And for the energy, if you give it over to AI, it would get LFTR reactors mass produced and spent fuel rods reprocessed to get those LFTR reactors started up. The answers to the questions posed here are easy; it is just people are too dull to see it, instead they fail to reduce down problem sets to their ultimate answer while AI has the tools to do it with ease.
Social Media definitely made our society worse off. Let's hope Ai will not ruin society completely.
So evidently Musk will be making A. I.
Open AI is the the old USSR AI. None of you created it.
Elon Musk appears to be delaying the progress of OpenAI to allow his own AI technologies to catch up. He evidently recognizes OpenAI's significant lead in AI development, a field considered the next major leap in human innovation, where being left behind could mean missing out entirely. The misunderstanding is Musk's reputation as a supporter of human advancement which is contrasted with his actual role as merely a financier who capitalizes on the work of other scientists and engineers, then registers the patents in his own name. Whilst amateur crypto investors see him as a genius, others see him as more of a Patent Pirate.
Although, one must admit, Aspergers Musk might be the philanthropist and Drug Addict Musk might be the ruthless corporatist, or perhaps its the other way around.
If you ever actually listened to Musk more than just narrated and biased headlines you would actually understand his values and goals, then you would know what you said does not make sense. Musk is the super rare exception being a person with empathy and caring about humanity on a high level + competence to make it happen through technology that no other person with wealth or power ever convinced me of having, not by a long shot.
Musk donated 44 millions if he wanted after leaving in 2019 when microsoft invested in open AI he could have been a major share holder
@@TheRoggan123 Ive listened to all his interviews, he has never said anything remotely profound, coherent or impressive.
I think right now we are just in the preparation stage of AI being a benefit to mankind. Many people don't even have the right computers for AI, and even if OpenAI are sued, OpenAI hasn't given anything to mankind yet.
You dont get what they are talking about do you? You wont have your own ai. There will only be one and it will control every aspect of your life whether you have a pc or not...
Yes BUT...
Is it the real Elon Musk suing Open AI ???
My heartfelt condolence to Aaron Bushnell family and his relatives a US Airman posted in Israel for sacrificing his life for Palestinian rights and the genocide and injustice in Gaza. May his soul rest in peace....😢
People dont seem to understand what at stake with Agi. All elon is asking is that openai go back to being opensourced, witch means sharing the cutting edge with everyone
Yeah Sharing with the Chinese, Russians And the Iranians 😂😂.
How nice of you
@@Player2blood Well the world is going to have to learn to come together at some point. May as well have that talk now
@@Player2blood Its just a matter of time before everyone else has the same technology...so the most democratic thing to do is to get everyone's opinion on how to use it. That should be a world audience. 🤷
@@DAFascend bro stop having a Disney children views on the world.
No one is interested in peace just like how Disney or cartoon portrays it.
Those country will use those tech for evil.
USA is currently the leader in A.I but trust me, if other countries pass the US, they will not obey any law , they will clearly use if for oppression.
Something the US won't do.
Interms of sharing, those other countries aren't democratic in nature.
They are authoritarian.
So it will be a great error to do that
ah yes, the man whose 'brilliance' destroyed Twitter...let's listen to him.
Hmmmm… AI in politics? …the dilemma of not being able to tell fake lies from real lies.
Elon sues OpenAI because he doesn't want to pay to use it. As a person who has political awareness, however, he knows how to substitute his true motive with a more sympathetic one.
what is the name of this reporter
Some of us actually have true discernment instead, we know A.I. is merely an electronic ouija board...we know that's a no no too!
Social media dulls our mind. GPT sharpens it. We are not cattle
Is Elon being antisemitic?!
YAY!!!!!
Back to brod i guess
Elon Musk has become so backward. he has lost the plot. supporting Texas, buying Twitter, and saying Ukraine should surrender. he is gone in the head.