@@DrSchor Just tried it again and was totally destroyed in 7 spins. This system only works if you don't get whacked early. I also did 50 spins without martingale and was down -$800. So again this is a get lucky out of the gate system or get destroyed.
Hello Jack! Since I'm a low roller, I like this system at a lower buy in and bet size at first. Then I would increase my bets after a few hits while building my bankroll. Great explanation and analysis of this system! I wish I could try this system out in Vegas as I like the wheel coverage and the potential of winning! ( Too hot out there ) Thank you again Jack! Robert /:-)
i think the problem with looking at a system like this with your simulator is that you are running it 1000s of times which will average out the outcome close to the house's advantage. I think we all would play this system with a walk away point. So maybe more complex to analyze but more realistic to see how likely you can reach your profit goal in x amount of spins.
Love your approach on these videos. With this one, I didn’t have to get past $350 for a less than 75% wind rate to know that this one is certainly not a grapefruit.
Hi im pretty new to betting on roulette.Ive been checking out a few strategies ..This one looked pretty decent .Tried it out with a lower bankroll and was very pleased..I think with most strategies you cant afford to try and outplay the wheel.Get out and dont get too greedy
I played this on a cruise last week. The table was $1 minimum, $100 maximum, so I cut it in half for $175 a spin for a $50 win each time. After a while I found out I could bet the full $350. I had fun, and won more sessions than I lost. I didn't martingale.
I tried this on ETG at my local casino after having seen Alex/David review it. My local casino won’t allow it on ETG, even with 10 whacks. Disappointing, but I will give it a shot on a live table soon enough. I always appreciate your in depth insights Jack!
WHY they won't allow this method of bet ? Is this really that GOOD that CASINOS are afraid of ??? WOW... for CASINOS to bank this , speak loudly for this !
Definitely the system to play when up on the "house's money" and you want to try to "give it back" before you go home.. How do you feel about shaving potential profit in exchange for 1st and 3rd columns as a hedge?
there is no such thing as the houses money, Now that it is your money, you must play it as what it is, no different then you play your own money, because that is what it is now. if you think you can take a higher risk than you did when you just won it, you will be taking a higher risk of loss. taking a higher risk of loss of course, leads to loss. the whole trick to win is to take no more risk than you did with the money you walked in with
Hi Jack, need your brain on this scenario : Using a combination of 8 systems based on various triggers : 74 win sessions + 1 loss session = 4839 spins total with $9459 total wager and a NET Win of $512.9 a) 4839 sample size is sufficient to draw a conclusion ? b) Is this merely a statistical VARIANCE ( lucky break ) or did I break the wheel, so to speak ? c) Statistically what sample size and what % of NET WIN do I need to claim that I have beaten the house edge ?
I love this systems potential. Great way to make a few hundred and leave. I do feel like maybe martingale isn't necessary. Odds of hitting 4 in a row tom recoup losses seem pretty decent. Of course like every other system it won't hold up long term. So get in, get out, or come back another day and fight again.
Flat betting doesn't work. For every loss you need to win 4 times to get ahead again. If you get two or three losses in a row you will not recoup from that. I tried it with 1 up on a loss, so 350, 700, 1050, etc. That did not work either. Martingale works but you need a massive massive bankroll that you can afford to lose. I started a session with 1 dollar units, so a 7 dollar bet. I got a couple of losses and managed to recoup, however it took three bets of 1792 dollar to get ahead again. So that is not really a feasible option for most of us. Next strategy.
I think Romanovski might be better than V28. For a $320 bet you’re only winning $40 a spin but with only 6 whacks on a double zero wheel. With V28 you’re betting $350 to win $100 but there are 10 whacks on the wheel. So, I don’t know.
start with 25 cents and keep doubling, you will get to 100 dollars soon. if at first you don't succeed, well you have to expect that. know when to hold up is the classic gamblers advice. we all know, hold on, if even for just one day, and things will go your way,
can you try the 2nd & 3rd plus Black and odd? I tried it with 5 per unit. and bet 2-3, B/O . total of 20. add 1 unit each every loss. except if loss is less than 50%. and I set 25 target . if I hit that target Reset to 5 per unit bet. with huge patience I made around 50-100/hr. do you think it is good? or I can modify and get a better result?
so this is basically the lazy man approach to betting 28 numbers on the board ? I mean if I randomly bet 28 numbers, I would have exactly the SAME EV as this , correct ? So what "advantage" of this versus picking 28 numbers individually , besides the convenience of placing 5 spots instead of 28 spots...
Terrible system. Betting 8 units to get back 1 not very wise. At least play classic romanofsky. You leave only 4 numbers uncovered not 8 like this system
I spun the wheel 5 times and got to plus $500 and cashed out. Can't ask for more than that. Great system for getting in and getting out with profit.
what happened when you tried it the next time?
@@DrSchor Just tried it again and was totally destroyed in 7 spins. This system only works if you don't get whacked early.
I also did 50 spins without martingale and was down -$800. So again this is a get lucky out of the gate system or get destroyed.
Thank you for showing my system!! I appreciate your content!
You invented this? Nice
Well, guess with your MONEY PRINTING MACHINE, you are by now a MULTI-MILLIONAIRE on your way to BILLIONAIRE !
Hello Jack! Since I'm a low roller, I like this system at a lower buy in and bet size at first. Then I would increase my bets after a few hits while building my bankroll. Great explanation and analysis of this system! I wish I could try this system out in Vegas as I like the wheel coverage and the potential of winning! ( Too hot out there ) Thank you again Jack! Robert /:-)
Just what I did, you can double up more than once this way. Really is easy money this one. Remember, don't be greedy.
Love this guy, GREAT channel!!!
I'm thinking of going with $75 on one of the dozens and $25 on each of the four corners of my choosing
Hit twice and walk away up $100 🤑
Hit 10,0 and 36 in a row like i did and start crying !
I played this on a 10 p table and won £26.00 ty
i think the problem with looking at a system like this with your simulator is that you are running it 1000s of times which will average out the outcome close to the house's advantage. I think we all would play this system with a walk away point. So maybe more complex to analyze but more realistic to see how likely you can reach your profit goal in x amount of spins.
Love your approach on these videos. With this one, I didn’t have to get past $350 for a less than 75% wind rate to know that this one is certainly not a grapefruit.
Hi im pretty new to betting on roulette.Ive been checking out a few strategies ..This one looked pretty decent .Tried it out with a lower bankroll and was very pleased..I think with most strategies you cant afford to try and outplay the wheel.Get out and dont get too greedy
true of most strategies but as you know, not all. dont give up, keep trying until you find the few that work.
I played this on a cruise last week. The table was $1 minimum, $100 maximum, so I cut it in half for $175 a spin for a $50 win each time. After a while I found out I could bet the full $350. I had fun, and won more sessions than I lost. I didn't martingale.
I tried this on ETG at my local casino after having seen Alex/David review it. My local casino won’t allow it on ETG, even with 10 whacks. Disappointing, but I will give it a shot on a live table soon enough. I always appreciate your in depth insights Jack!
Same here at corporate casino but I was able to play this system (ETG) at a tribal casino
WHY they won't allow this method of bet ? Is this really that GOOD that CASINOS are afraid of ??? WOW... for CASINOS to bank this , speak loudly for this !
Definitely the system to play when up on the "house's money" and you want to try to "give it back" before you go home..
How do you feel about shaving potential profit in exchange for 1st and 3rd columns as a hedge?
there is no such thing as the houses money, Now that it is your money, you must play it as what it is, no different then you play your own money, because that is what it is now. if you think you can take a higher risk than you did when you just won it, you will be taking a higher risk of loss. taking a higher risk of loss of course, leads to loss. the whole trick to win is to take no more risk than you did with the money you walked in with
this is beautiful
Hi Jack, need your brain on this scenario :
Using a combination of 8 systems based on various triggers :
74 win sessions + 1 loss session = 4839 spins total with $9459 total wager and a NET Win of $512.9
a) 4839 sample size is sufficient to draw a conclusion ?
b) Is this merely a statistical VARIANCE ( lucky break ) or did I break the wheel, so to speak ?
c) Statistically what sample size and what % of NET WIN do I need to claim that I have beaten the house edge ?
statistically over a sample size of 1 million you only need a .01% net win to claim you have beaten the house edge
I love this systems potential. Great way to make a few hundred and leave. I do feel like maybe martingale isn't necessary. Odds of hitting 4 in a row tom recoup losses seem pretty decent. Of course like every other system it won't hold up long term. So get in, get out, or come back another day and fight again.
Great content ty.
Hey Donkey, love the content. I was wondering on your payout board at 1:24 it shows number 34 at 150$ where everything else is 100$.
Oops! Obvious mistake! Thanks for the comment!
When you're UP Get Out! What is it you want to be able to say to me?
i want to be able to say i had dumb luck for once
Very nice system 3 hit go
I like this one.
Can you just flat bet after a loss instead of doubling?
I know it would double the amount of wins to recoup
I feel the Martingale is optional.
@JackAceDotCom I feel just flat is safer but to many losses in a row your done.
Maybe with solid win/ goal & stop/loss might be ok
Flat betting doesn't work. For every loss you need to win 4 times to get ahead again. If you get two or three losses in a row you will not recoup from that. I tried it with 1 up on a loss, so 350, 700, 1050, etc. That did not work either.
Martingale works but you need a massive massive bankroll that you can afford to lose. I started a session with 1 dollar units, so a 7 dollar bet. I got a couple of losses and managed to recoup, however it took three bets of 1792 dollar to get ahead again. So that is not really a feasible option for most of us. Next strategy.
@@dennissmith7060 You mean you bet a total of 7$ and martingale up to 1792$. ?
@@dennissmith7060set a target. then reset your bet. not possible to recoup losses, but it can manage your backroll. and not lose everything
What system have you given with a grapefruit rating?
Verrrrry Interesting
but schtupid
I will try this with 50% of the bet and martingale to this one. Seems like a good one to try
2 200 000 $....Even on Demo I had 10 / 0 and 36 in 3 rows ! Recover such losses...
ดี ซ่อม4ตาจะกลับมากำไร 50หรือแทงทบ2ครั้งให้ถูกติดกันกลัมมากำไร50ถ้าผิด ดี
Nice system but I would hit once and go..100 dollar is a lot for me!
The best 👌 👍
I think Romanovski might be better than V28. For a $320 bet you’re only winning $40 a spin but with only 6 whacks on a double zero wheel. With V28 you’re betting $350 to win $100 but there are 10 whacks on the wheel. So, I don’t know.
Superb.....
CEG calls this the Spreading Eagle strategy as it represents a woman's legs spread and her upside down diamond shown in front of you to see.
Spread Eagle. I like it.
Just letting you know at 1:15, the green graphic for number 34 win is incorrect. It should be $100, not $150.
Yeah, thanks - someone else pointed that out a while back. It's hard editing all those numbers! Sometimes things fall through the cracks!
HAVE YOU GOT ANYTHING WITH A SMALL BANK ROLL AND WINNINGA 100 DOLLARS A DAY IN 5 MINUTES LET ME KNOW OK IM IN VEGAS AND LIVE HERE
start with 25 cents and keep doubling, you will get to 100 dollars soon. if at first you don't succeed, well you have to expect that. know when to hold up is the classic gamblers advice. we all know, hold on, if even for just one day, and things will go your way,
What happens if you bust on martingale? What do you do next?
go the atm. quitters never win
Pretty interesting, the martingale after a loss is risky but a good way to recover !
The 50 on 2and twelve is only a 100 dollar push, not a 100 dollar win.
It’s a $150 bet on the 2nd dozen.
What simulator do you use ?
I made it myself.
can you try the 2nd & 3rd plus Black and odd? I tried it with 5 per unit. and bet 2-3, B/O . total of 20. add 1 unit each every loss. except if loss is less than 50%. and I set 25 target . if I hit that target Reset to 5 per unit bet. with huge patience I made around 50-100/hr. do you think it is good? or I can modify and get a better result?
Can you try it at a real casino with real money
yes, anyone can do that
hit 1 or 2 then cash out, thats a better way to win over the roullete, keep sitting there to win over 1k 2k you would never call it a real win
Boa sua explicação
I don’t think I would Martingale
Dont bother going to Woodbine casino only double zero wheels
I wouldn’t martingale at all lol.
i dont get the joke. why is that funny
Excellent graphics chapeau
so this is basically the lazy man approach to betting 28 numbers on the board ?
I mean if I randomly bet 28 numbers, I would have exactly the SAME EV as this , correct ?
So what "advantage" of this versus picking 28 numbers individually , besides the convenience of placing 5 spots instead of 28 spots...
why isnt convenience enough of an advantage for you
or a you a mule headed person who insists on doing things the hard way
Só jogo com 3 ficha
Peach
I try i i. Lost my money on recovering of my lost
Terrible system. Betting 8 units to get back 1 not very wise. At least play classic romanofsky. You leave only 4 numbers uncovered not 8 like this system
It’s 7 units to get 2 ….
It’s 7 units to get 2 ….
very bad system
24+ numbers+martingale gg 200/300+let's go