What did you think of this movie? Do you think if the movie pleases the fans of the games then it's a success? Or does a movie like this require more in order to be considered 'successful'? Comment your thoughts below!
For me it was pure disappointment Nothing in the movie matched the fnaf lore except a few names that were displaced anyway. 1. William only daughter was Elizabeth, who was killed by Circus Baby and then Elizabeth's soul possessed CB 2. Mike's family name isn't Schmidt, it's Afton, Mike is Williams son and hes brother wasn't killed by a stranger, Mike killed his own brother by accident 3. None of the animatronics are friendly in the slightest, they seek revenge on William, not to make other kids like them 4. Springtrap(William Afton) wouldn't have killed her daughter just like that in an instant like he did in the movie bcs she actually loved his kids in his own way. This is already a long comment and i could go on forever. P.S. I'm not saying that you are wrong for liking the movie or something obviously, it's just that I've seen so many people saying that the movie is based on the lore but it truly isn't. It's money grab in my opinion
@@TheLegenD-fx4mc Same anyone who says it's based on lore is a moron who is blindsided. They failed to explore the vast and complicated lore of FNAF and opted for an easy appeal to kids with cheesy things and a predictable plot. For such a "perfect" movie that Scott has been working on for years, it failed to deliver more than a 7/10 for me. It was great for its fanservice, but did not faithfully adapt the lore at all. I loved the cameos from FNAF RUclipsrs like Cory though.
@@ibidknight Cory should've had a different cameo role. The taxi scenes were only used for laughs. It'd be better if he was Mike's boss who fired him from his original job. He has the perfect energy for a disgruntled, angry boss to play the role.
@@CourtRobGray Cory is great at being genuine and also we see his skits in the beginning of some of his videos, he definitely could have done a role with more acting...
If you had an expectation of a horror movie, I believe you would get disappointed. But if you went in with no expectation other than just seeing a movie, you had a good time. That's my thoughts
Same I agree with all the valid criticism and have some of my own regarding the predictable plot and the failure to adapt FNAF's complicated lore, but overall it was a good watch with the fanservice and the cameos/easter eggs, just not as perfect as it could have been from working on it for years as Scott announced its delay many times, hyping it up a lot.
@@Craigalicioususayeeeet.. good for what it was I suppose and it did have scary aspects but all that was created by the games. Everything the movie introduced just felt like kiddy fluff.. only way I can describe it. Like we are talking about a movie where kids are being abducted, killed and stuffed in suits.. but here we are making castles, dancing around, side problem is a mean aunt with a goofy lawyer. Odd combination of things. For what the actors had they all did an amazing job thought but that just through me offer even further😂 like just an amazing performance for something that seemed half baked
I feel like it would have worked better as a 6 episode tv show with the first episode presenting the characters motivations, flaws etc and the following episodes representing each night at Freddy's
You are completely right, a TV show was a better choice. Each game or major arc of the lore could be represented through seasons with flashbacks and the minigames incorporated into that too, while appealing to the original uncanny and nostalgic feeling of the fans and being able to ensnare new watchers with a slow burn of a thrilling plot as we build up to the main antagonist, not just toss him in with no buildup and hope it works.
Things I liked about the movie: -the animatronics (the puppets not how they were used) -mikes character in general -mikes and Abby’s relationship -the opening scene - the choir of ghost children as the main theme -the ghost children themselves(especially golden Freddy) -the scene where the baby sitter gets killed - and William afton in the end(even though there’s like no set up to his character and it kind of ruins it) Anything that wasn’t mentioned i ether was indifferent about it or actively disliked it.
The reason why Vanessa had a change of heart was because of Abby. What was originally cut from the film was a flashback scene with a little Vanessa hiding under a table while Spring Bonnie was killing those kids. She doesn't want anything to do with her father's doing. She was just dragged into this. You think she's had a change of heart, I think she was always a good person, just manipulated by her abusive relationship with her father.
I think what killed it the most was the playing and fort building scene. Its like it catered more to the fans of the fnaf fan fiction instead of the original fnaf itself. I didn’t hate the idea of Abby befriending the children but it was executed in a very cheesy way. I liked how she was established to have an imaginary friend at the begging and I thought this would continue with the ghost children making it scary. But having her be shown playing with the characters moving so live like was just goofy. The writers could’ve easily had mike assume she had given the characters imaginary personalities.
bruh… this is literally what I’ve said about the movie. The fort scene literally F’ed the movie up. Like I acknowledge the fact that I don’t know the full lore about the FNAF franchise and I get the fact that there’s always going to be something in movies that simply doesn’t match or happened in the game or whatever the movie it’s talking about; but bro… that scene literally had no real reason to ever exist in the 1st place, and I would even argue that the scene wouldn’t even make sense or be any good EVEN if Vanessa and Mike weren’t there (only Abby).
Interesting take. I found the fort scene absolutly important because it showed that they were just kids when they got killed and they still are just kids, not just murderous animatronics. Also the scene gets so much darker when later in the movie it's revealed that the bodies of the children are still in there. Gave me a real shock moment to think back to that scene knowing there's bodies in those animatronics.
I have issues with Vanessa - if this movie was solely Freddy lore, fine, but making her the daughter (when it isn’t the same daughter as what lore states - his kids were Michael Afton, "the Crying Child" and Elizabeth Afton). And, she isn’t the same Vanessa from the games (Vanny, a follower of the digital virus Glitchtrap) … who is she exactly? She just adds a weird element. They could have called her Elizabeth and I’d be less iffy about her inclusion.
It’s not confirmed if this is the Vanessa from Security Breach. Just like William Afton, she could have changed her identity and is Elizabeth. In the movie, she called herself Vanessa Shelly, but in Security Breach, in the therapy tapes, she was Vanessa A. Here’s when the curve comes into play, though. Also in the therapy tapes, Vanessa’s dad was named Billy, which is the nickname for William, so Vanessa’s dad’s name is Billy A, or William Afton. See why they did this now?
the ones saying it doesnt match the game lore dont make sense imo, the books did something like that wth making a new type of lore, and if anything the movie matches the books more another thing about the lack of gore with the large child fanbase parents most likely wouldnt want kids seeing that I do think some things could have been changed to make it better I would have loved full blown horror but even the games were never full blown horror In my opinion the movie was good, yet that could easily be that I'll take anything with my interests. I can understand why someone wouldnt like the movie tho with how slow it felt even for me
The difference is the novels actually did well with the new adaptation, a lot of people loved the desolate and eerie feeling of returning to FNAF with a grown-up cast so it didn't feel like it appealed to kids solely and more to die-hard and longtime fans. On top of that eerie nostalgia, there was a thickening plot that wasn't too predictable unlike the movie and wasn't cheesy, characters who were grown up were relatable to grown up fans and William Afton was properly introduced, not just thrown in with no buildup like the movie and then turned into Springtrap. Although The Golden Closet was mediocre with the plot twists, the first two novels in the 3-piece series were really good adaptations of the FNAF games. The movie had a lot more to work with, since it has been in development for years with Scott delaying it multiple times to be "perfect", but it's a 7/10 at best. It was a good movie for fans, but failed to delve past a predictable plot and go into complex lore, or buildup characters well enough. Edit: The gore is irrelevant, most people didn't care. The biggest problem is the predictable and cheesy plot, lore not being incorporated well, and character development being nonexistent. It's not like there isn't a lot of source material to work with, it just isn't shown or used at all. Also the red eyes was unnecessary, another useless pandering for children rather than the original fans who grew up with FNAF.
Been a fnaf fan for years and I understand why people who are not won’t like it, this movie was definitely made mainly for the community and it shows, with all the RUclipsr appearances and the easter eggs, I really loved the movie but of course I’m biased, but it’s pretty damn impressive how this game, this one game that was one man’s last try at game development turn into something more within the span of 10 years. Never thought it would be scary with the direction fnaf has been going within the past few years, this is exactly what I expected and I can’t say I’m disappointed, the actual animatronics look amazing and I’m really happy to see this get made
@@howler11agree, imo the movie was already good on its own but its lacking scary content, except for a messed up eyes freddy on abby's house, that ones kinda creepy
@@lussurio2325 yhea, my biggest complaint is that they made it for kids, literally, because it restricted them in scary and messed up content. i think they could have made their eyes better, and i complain about that alot mainly because i've seen cosplayers do the animatronics eyes better, like instead of all the eye glowing, only the iris, it would look better and it's not that hard, i dont know why they would'nt do it like this. but it's meaningless for me because if they had made it a bit more gory and scary it would be more fnaf in my opinion.
@@lussurio2325 Not just missing the scary content, the biggest part is the lore. It failed to faithfully adapt the complex lore of FNAF and just opted for predictable plot and cheesy things to appeal to children. Longtime fans who grew up with FNAF expected better, it was still a great fan service that was worth the wait, but not more than a 7/10 imo.
@@themagnificentorange672 yeah I give a 6 it's decent but not great or a masterpiece as everyone is saying it's great because theatre experiences are screaming and laughing at the movie not with the movie, shouting references make the theatre experiences a blast but movie itself below average
I think it was decent. But they could have made William a lot more scary if he used the knife more. I also think a hide and seek scene between Abby and Mike against William would have been scary aswell. But nah William went from a terrifying killer to an offensive lineman..
Should have been more present in the movie maybe as a man with the rabbit it on that inconveniences mike in deadly situations but mike never knowing if he’s real or not. Then when he shows up from the shadows like he did in the end it would have been a more satisfying reveal.
I mean yeah he couldve been scarier but to be honest i thought he was pretty scary in his entrance he walked towards mike slowly and then raised his posture, then out of nowhere he just ran at mike full speed, that part was really cool.
This movie was absolute dog shit and I have been a fan since first ever FNAF came out. Vanessa being William's daughter? Really? Mike carried the whole movie only his story made SOME sense and the springlock scene? I almost fell asleep.
I know right! I did NOT expect that at all but it was amazing! Not the fact that she got her head bit off ofc but just the fact they made that a scene.
I agree with most of your points, I just think you should keep in mind it was made for children and if you compare to horror movies made for children this is really top notch
As a FNAF fan, I adore this movie to no end and appreciate how it was catered and made for me and others like me. As a film fan, I still enjoy it, for the acting and the effects, a few of the scenes, but I’m disappointed it’s tricky for newcomers to really invest in and understand. I think it needed another 30-40 minutes, but I do have hope they’ll learn and make a sequel more appealing to general audiences as well as fans.
Tbh the movie had potential. They should’ve stuck to the animatronics being evil trying to kill the security guard and everyone else involved. It had potential that’s for sure. Only problem is it went into the wrong hands bc they did just about everything they could’ve to make it a bad movie…
I loved the movie, even if it wasn't with many gore well that isn't what FNAF is about. It did show the element of hidden mystery, it even showed a bit of kills but I did say that gore wasn't involved. The entire FNAF thing Mr.BrainPilot is that every story ends without any information. Scott has a way of leaving major questions which till this day some of the questions haven't been answer. To be honest I was way happy to hear your comment then others because everyone was complaining about The Red Eyes.
@@DYELGAINZ i know, thats the point of why it sucks that it was for kids, because the actual audience is the teens and adults from 2014 who are now adults and older adults not some kids who just know them from shitty animations and monster school huggybwuggy crossovers, they were so focused on making sure it reached a wide audience even though theyvebhad a steady and decently loyal audience since years ago, even people like me who barely keep up with fnaf have said screw it and went to watch it anyways they, none of the kids who were being pandered to actually give a damn about it you could ask like 100 kids about fnaf and all of them would probably say, idk evil robot animals, and that they havent played a single game in the series and if they did it was probably security breach which is just cuz their mom or dad who played the games let them play and even then they probably stopped playing cuz they got scared, in the end all im saying is they wouldve done well without all the pandering to kids and family friendly horror movie asthetic
@@brainnuggets8601i aint readin allat but scott himself said the audience is targetted around 12 yr olds because a story about ghosts possessing robots makes you realise it sounds a little silly when you grow up
the movie was great but I will respectfully disagree with you. movies aren't supposed to go the same way as they did in the game/TV series for example in one piece live action all of the things in OP are different than in the anime. the reason why the fnaf movie is not connecting to FNAF 1 is to make new FNAF lore.
already, your opinion is slightly biased at the start. but hey, im not here to shit on your parade, your opinion is your opinion and i have no problem with that. i liked the movie but just because i did doesnt mean everyone else should. we all have different thoughts. but yeah, it was weird that the critics score did not match up with the audience score but whatever
I can't tell if this follows the lore or the books more, this should've been a lot more gorey, I think it should've started from the back stories first, follow the lore and not so much the books. Anyone kinda mad William had a daughter named Vanessa and not Elizabeth? He isn't following his back ground. I dislike how much this doesn't follow anything through. I hope it does have another movie to maybe figure the rest of the story parts out.
i think the reason vanessa had a change of heart was because when she realised mike had a younger sister and lost his family she realised how tough it would be for her without mike
nothing in this movie was mediocre. It was either really good, good, or disgustingly bad, such as the fort making scene and the uber skit. I love it so much. All of the gore was really well done, the scene where the springlocks activated and "killed" william was really well done, the first scene where mike beats up the kid's dad is amazing, most of the first half is great. It may not be a good movie, but it's really fun, and I would watch it again. I cheered for matpat by the way
Mike chosing to give up his responsibility isn’t exactly out of character cause its been established since the prologue that being so consumed with his past leads him to make impulsive actions.The real problem with that part is that his choice has no thematic weight to it because he still managed to save his sister regardless.
Not really tbh. I do see some comparisons but not entirely. In the novel Afton pretended to be a guard, in the movie he pretended to be a career counselor. And in the novel, Charlie's brother was never taken. That's just what Charlie thought, she was actually taken by Afton. But Mike's brother was actually kidnapped by Afton. And Mike was a nightguard while the novel was just a group of kids messing around and exploring a abandoned pizzeria.
Great video man! when I left the cinema I was wondering all day why was normal audience upset or consider it boring, watching your video really made me see why people criticize a lor of it, hope that if a second movie is made the narrative of the story is way better as well as the construction of characters.
the scene where the babysitter died was a missed opportunity for a nice bite out of her skull. instead we got the cheesy clip of her being pulled in and bit in half.
Totally think comparing something like the last of us too this is not fair because TLOU had a clear story from the jump and is a story based game. But yeah I can see how wanting to make it to where more regular audiences would enjoy it than just the fan base but again I hella enjoyed the movie I knew it wasn’t going to be pure horror because of the game
If you went in to see a horror movie you were disappointed, if you were in to see it for seeing a good (not great just good) movie, you enjoyed it. Admittedly it should have went R rated to be an actual horror movie. The division is what you expected in the movie. There was rarely a sense of actual fear when you saw the animatronics, just intrigue. Not a single person in the movie felt truly scared of the animatronics.
in the games mike was the son of afton, vannessa isn't even a part of any of the old games. the movie didn't even really focus on the lore, it more focused on referencing the franchise.
2:40 I was also told that the movie isn't for me too, cause I never played the game and that's why I didn't like it. Ironically, the youtuber penguinz0 has played the games and he gave the movie a 45% score I think The best approach would have been to make a FNAF movie for the loyal gamers but also a great plot and characters for general audiences
I'm not a fan too, I only heard what the heck is five nights at freddy's is, From the "Rule 34". That's the how i learned What is five nights at freddy's is...😂
I don't get what is the meaning of putting the children into animatronics. Does it mean the dead bodies were actually inside or just their ghosts? What happened to the bodies? The children might be treated as "missing" but how about the grown men and women killed and no one cared or asked about them? The most ridiculous was for the villain so eager to hire a night watchman - which was the most certain way for his secret to be discovered.
I wouldn't say the movie is bad, but I wouldn't say it was great either. What really threw me off from really liking it was the shallow story, the over used themes, and cheesy themes , and possible plot holes the movie created??(no pun intended) If you watch it again you'll notice the movie is mostly made up of a few types of scenes repeated 3 or more times. The foxy hallway scenes and the over use of the dreams. This movie was more about Mike dreaming than it was about his experience at Freddie's. I think it would have been great if he did fall asleep night one (its the easiest night in game after all) and the replace the dreaming at work with dreaming outside of work to keep that part of his story without sacrificing the literal name of the series. It would also get rid of some very unnecessary scenes that ways. He's still be able to interact with his sister too cuz he's not going to be sleeping all day and kids are prone to waking up adults when they need them lol. Also I feel like the worst part of this movie is the Freddy shreddy machine (yes I'm calling it that you cannot stop me)😁 Idk like I said I didn't hate the movie but it felt like there wasn't any passion put into it. I wasn't expecting this to be an answer solving masterpiece but eh, I was expecting a good movie at the least.The best part of the movie was MatPat coming on screen imo.
It's interesting, the plot points you pointed to as not making sense or not working etc... were plot points added for the movie that weren't part of the game lore.
I just wanted the kids to have more than 5 seconds because I’ve always wanted to see the kids and the party to where it all happened where they all got fruit ninja’d by Afton. Even PG-13 still they could’ve had the screen turn black after the lured the kids into the room. Bc we see the kids and I just can’t sympathize bc I barley have seen them. I also wish Afton himself got more screen time with some flashbacks. Or at least more explanation. Rather R rated or not.
I highly disagree with your opinion because I never played any of the games and still loved every second of the film. I just finished watching it for the second time and cannot get over how amazing the plot is! I can understand some people not liking the film because it is more or less true fan service, but I honestly think that the movie was made as a thank from Scott. For those of you who don't know, Scott Cawthon has officially retired and will not be coming back to the franchise.
It didnt make sense to me but my dayghter who is a fan thought it was fantastic. She mentioned a discrepancy regarding the female cop beinng the bad dudes daughter.
To answer the part about Garrett, I think that he was most definitely given the "animatronic treatment" given the "IT'S ME" writing on the foggy mirror before the scene where Mike meets Vanessa, hinting to the fact that Garrett is reaching out to his brother in the form of Golden Freddy; a parallel to the games. I'd also have to disagree with you on the part about the Garrett plotline being most likely over with. When taking a look at the unresolved shot I mentioned, as well as the final message at the end of the movie ("C-O-M-E F-I-N-D M-E"), I don't think that the story with Garrett is through quite yet. All in all, great video!
I prefer Willy's Wonderland. It's more faithful to the theme and lore of Freddy's. I saw this movie today on my birthday and there were only seven people in the theater including me and my husband. It dragged and made no sense. Pretty wrapping a garbage gift. I knew when they said PG13, It was going to be garbage. It's a watered down version suitable for families.
I honestly disagree. I liked how they did the movie and I think it was well done. My only problem is William Afton's sudden appearance in the Springbonnie suit. I wish he had more of a role. I know that he's not as present in the games either but still think there could have been more about him. The story also reminds me of The Silver Eyes novel. About Charlie's brother supposedly being taken by William Afton and the same happening with Mike's brother in the movie. At first I thought it'll be the exact same scenario where Mike thought his brother was taken but in reality it was him who was taken just like in the novel. But apparently that wasn't what happened and his brother was actually taken which I honestly think is better for the plot.
OK as a fnaf fan my self im not gonna lie i loved the movie but like you said the movie didnt feel like horror if like a none fnaf fan whos a horror lover watched this they will wonder why it was marked as horror it didnt feel like a horror movie that scares you and if they where able to make it so the fandom can gow with people who wernt fans to make it the best movie of all time this movie was more for fans of fnaf i wish it was like the last of us where it let people that wernt fans injoy it but it cant be changed but its still a good movie for me the fans lol
i just didnt like vanessa and how mike and her interacted she just shows up not explaining why and i know she has this secret about her past but whenever he asked her anything she would dodge the question and not in a sly way and when he pushed it she just deflected back and then hed drop it. there wasn’t any character development from anyone until mike in the last 15 minutes of the movie. pretty much no jump scares and not much of a horror element while fnaf is known for jump scares and people will say its pg-13 but so was lights out 6.43-10
I like it a little bit, but it didn't really feel like a fnaf movie to me. If it was like a fnaf movie mike watching the place and protecting himself with doors all 5 nights staying up. Maybe the sequel will be good, but I doubt it.
Thanks for succinctly putting into words how I felt about this film and the response to it. Frankly if I were a major FNAF fan, I'd be pretty disappointed in this film. TLOU had to be adapted to fit the TV formula and if it hadn't I doubt it would be as popular as it is now. Lore or no lore, a film is not a game and it can't function the same way.
I agree. I really wanted to like this movie. I'm not a gamer, so I didn't know the lore either. I know the idea of the game is loosely based on the real life Chuck E. Cheese massacre from the 1980s.
Honestly I feel like if you haven’t played the game once or haven’t seen the lore yet then you most likely won’t enjoy the movie due to the fact that you’ll need lore behind the game to experience the thrill and mystery of the movie and the game because that’s what the movie is based off of
If i had to give the movie a rating, I'd rate it a C+ they tried, but the way that they strayed from the games lore just made it feel like a cheap knockoff. Like afton willingly was wearing the springlock suit. Vanessa laying next to the animatronic suits (which had the corpses of children inside them) and so many other things. It started well and ended well, but the middle was just weird
to be honest I loved it sm but the lore didn't transfer into the movie, for instance the ending, William has A daughter named Venessa?? and mike wasn't his kid in this??? IDK but as a fnaf fan for 6 years, idk abt the accuracy yk?
Well yea, of course it did, first of all it was rated R, gives it more freedom with the scares and kills, and while it was based on fnaf, it didn’t have an established fan base primarily made up of kids
I think what was good about the fnaf series it was scary but also had lore to it if they tried to do the same with the fnaf movie it would've been better
It would look less divisive if the percentages are put into perspective, 87% of the critics (including yourself) rated it 5/10 and 87% of the viewers rated it 6/10
What did you think of this movie? Do you think if the movie pleases the fans of the games then it's a success? Or does a movie like this require more in order to be considered 'successful'? Comment your thoughts below!
For me it was pure disappointment
Nothing in the movie matched the fnaf lore except a few names that were displaced anyway.
1. William only daughter was Elizabeth, who was killed by Circus Baby and then Elizabeth's soul possessed CB
2. Mike's family name isn't Schmidt, it's Afton, Mike is Williams son and hes brother wasn't killed by a stranger, Mike killed his own brother by accident
3. None of the animatronics are friendly in the slightest, they seek revenge on William, not to make other kids like them
4. Springtrap(William Afton) wouldn't have killed her daughter just like that in an instant like he did in the movie bcs she actually loved his kids in his own way.
This is already a long comment and i could go on forever.
P.S. I'm not saying that you are wrong for liking the movie or something obviously, it's just that I've seen so many people saying that the movie is based on the lore but it truly isn't. It's money grab in my opinion
@@TheLegenD-fx4mc Same anyone who says it's based on lore is a moron who is blindsided. They failed to explore the vast and complicated lore of FNAF and opted for an easy appeal to kids with cheesy things and a predictable plot. For such a "perfect" movie that Scott has been working on for years, it failed to deliver more than a 7/10 for me. It was great for its fanservice, but did not faithfully adapt the lore at all. I loved the cameos from FNAF RUclipsrs like Cory though.
@@ibidknight Cory should've had a different cameo role. The taxi scenes were only used for laughs. It'd be better if he was Mike's boss who fired him from his original job. He has the perfect energy for a disgruntled, angry boss to play the role.
@@CourtRobGray Cory is great at being genuine and also we see his skits in the beginning of some of his videos, he definitely could have done a role with more acting...
Is it strange that I agree with most every negative criticism I've heard for the movie, and yet I still like it? I dunno, I had lots of fun
Sometimes that's the greatest feeling
Or you're mature and can handle other people's opinions
If you had an expectation of a horror movie, I believe you would get disappointed. But if you went in with no expectation other than just seeing a movie, you had a good time. That's my thoughts
Same I agree with all the valid criticism and have some of my own regarding the predictable plot and the failure to adapt FNAF's complicated lore, but overall it was a good watch with the fanservice and the cameos/easter eggs, just not as perfect as it could have been from working on it for years as Scott announced its delay many times, hyping it up a lot.
@@Craigalicioususayeeeet.. good for what it was I suppose and it did have scary aspects but all that was created by the games. Everything the movie introduced just felt like kiddy fluff.. only way I can describe it. Like we are talking about a movie where kids are being abducted, killed and stuffed in suits.. but here we are making castles, dancing around, side problem is a mean aunt with a goofy lawyer.
Odd combination of things. For what the actors had they all did an amazing job thought but that just through me offer even further😂 like just an amazing performance for something that seemed half baked
I feel like it would have worked better as a 6 episode tv show with the first episode presenting the characters motivations, flaws etc and the following episodes representing each night at Freddy's
Yeah I think a TV series would have probably worked better too!
I kinda thought this as well, when the movie ended
You are completely right, a TV show was a better choice. Each game or major arc of the lore could be represented through seasons with flashbacks and the minigames incorporated into that too, while appealing to the original uncanny and nostalgic feeling of the fans and being able to ensnare new watchers with a slow burn of a thrilling plot as we build up to the main antagonist, not just toss him in with no buildup and hope it works.
Things I liked about the movie:
-the animatronics (the puppets not how they were used)
-mikes character in general
-mikes and Abby’s relationship
-the opening scene
- the choir of ghost children as the main theme
-the ghost children themselves(especially golden Freddy)
-the scene where the baby sitter gets killed
- and William afton in the end(even though there’s like no set up to his character and it kind of ruins it)
Anything that wasn’t mentioned i ether was indifferent about it or actively disliked it.
Yeah the animatronics were definitely a cool part about it!
You can find more about this movie to like than I can.
dude the babysitter death scene made me laugh as it happened like her whole upper torso went inside of the at max 10 inch space in freddys mouth
@@brainnuggets8601 It was a cool death but no way her entire upper body fit in his mouth lmao that's just stupid.
@@frostmusicofficial it wouldve been better to just replicate the death likemin the fredbear minigame
The reason why Vanessa had a change of heart was because of Abby. What was originally cut from the film was a flashback scene with a little Vanessa hiding under a table while Spring Bonnie was killing those kids. She doesn't want anything to do with her father's doing. She was just dragged into this. You think she's had a change of heart, I think she was always a good person, just manipulated by her abusive relationship with her father.
Sounds like there was plenty of studio interference going on behind the scenes.
I think what killed it the most was the playing and fort building scene. Its like it catered more to the fans of the fnaf fan fiction instead of the original fnaf itself.
I didn’t hate the idea of Abby befriending the children but it was executed in a very cheesy way. I liked how she was established to have an imaginary friend at the begging and I thought this would continue with the ghost children making it scary. But having her be shown playing with the characters moving so live like was just goofy. The writers could’ve easily had mike assume she had given the characters imaginary personalities.
that part was fun until i realized, in the midst of them playing around, that they were pulling an Other Mother from Coraline
bruh… this is literally what I’ve said about the movie. The fort scene literally F’ed the movie up. Like I acknowledge the fact that I don’t know the full lore about the FNAF franchise and I get the fact that there’s always going to be something in movies that simply doesn’t match or happened in the game or whatever the movie it’s talking about; but bro… that scene literally had no real reason to ever exist in the 1st place, and I would even argue that the scene wouldn’t even make sense or be any good EVEN if Vanessa and Mike weren’t there (only Abby).
Interesting take. I found the fort scene absolutly important because it showed that they were just kids when they got killed and they still are just kids, not just murderous animatronics. Also the scene gets so much darker when later in the movie it's revealed that the bodies of the children are still in there. Gave me a real shock moment to think back to that scene knowing there's bodies in those animatronics.
I have issues with Vanessa - if this movie was solely Freddy lore, fine, but making her the daughter (when it isn’t the same daughter as what lore states - his kids were Michael Afton, "the Crying Child" and Elizabeth Afton). And, she isn’t the same Vanessa from the games (Vanny, a follower of the digital virus Glitchtrap) … who is she exactly? She just adds a weird element. They could have called her Elizabeth and I’d be less iffy about her inclusion.
It’s not confirmed if this is the Vanessa from Security Breach. Just like William Afton, she could have changed her identity and is Elizabeth. In the movie, she called herself Vanessa Shelly, but in Security Breach, in the therapy tapes, she was Vanessa A. Here’s when the curve comes into play, though. Also in the therapy tapes, Vanessa’s dad was named Billy, which is the nickname for William, so Vanessa’s dad’s name is Billy A, or William Afton. See why they did this now?
the ones saying it doesnt match the game lore dont make sense imo, the books did something like that wth making a new type of lore, and if anything the movie matches the books more another thing about the lack of gore with the large child fanbase parents most likely wouldnt want kids seeing that I do think some things could have been changed to make it better I would have loved full blown horror but even the games were never full blown horror
In my opinion the movie was good, yet that could easily be that I'll take anything with my interests. I can understand why someone wouldnt like the movie tho with how slow it felt even for me
Nah bruh the movie was nothing like the books at all
The difference is the novels actually did well with the new adaptation, a lot of people loved the desolate and eerie feeling of returning to FNAF with a grown-up cast so it didn't feel like it appealed to kids solely and more to die-hard and longtime fans. On top of that eerie nostalgia, there was a thickening plot that wasn't too predictable unlike the movie and wasn't cheesy, characters who were grown up were relatable to grown up fans and William Afton was properly introduced, not just thrown in with no buildup like the movie and then turned into Springtrap. Although The Golden Closet was mediocre with the plot twists, the first two novels in the 3-piece series were really good adaptations of the FNAF games. The movie had a lot more to work with, since it has been in development for years with Scott delaying it multiple times to be "perfect", but it's a 7/10 at best. It was a good movie for fans, but failed to delve past a predictable plot and go into complex lore, or buildup characters well enough.
Edit: The gore is irrelevant, most people didn't care. The biggest problem is the predictable and cheesy plot, lore not being incorporated well, and character development being nonexistent. It's not like there isn't a lot of source material to work with, it just isn't shown or used at all. Also the red eyes was unnecessary, another useless pandering for children rather than the original fans who grew up with FNAF.
Been a fnaf fan for years and I understand why people who are not won’t like it, this movie was definitely made mainly for the community and it shows, with all the RUclipsr appearances and the easter eggs, I really loved the movie but of course I’m biased, but it’s pretty damn impressive how this game, this one game that was one man’s last try at game development turn into something more within the span of 10 years. Never thought it would be scary with the direction fnaf has been going within the past few years, this is exactly what I expected and I can’t say I’m disappointed, the actual animatronics look amazing and I’m really happy to see this get made
i am a fnaf fan, i think the movie could have been a thousand times better
@@howler11agree, imo the movie was already good on its own but its lacking scary content, except for a messed up eyes freddy on abby's house, that ones kinda creepy
@@lussurio2325 yhea, my biggest complaint is that they made it for kids, literally, because it restricted them in scary and messed up content. i think they could have made their eyes better, and i complain about that alot mainly because i've seen cosplayers do the animatronics eyes better, like instead of all the eye glowing, only the iris, it would look better and it's not that hard, i dont know why they would'nt do it like this. but it's meaningless for me because if they had made it a bit more gory and scary it would be more fnaf in my opinion.
@@howler11 there are few gory parts in the movie tho, but yeah they should've make their eyes dark other than shining bright yellow/red
@@lussurio2325 Not just missing the scary content, the biggest part is the lore. It failed to faithfully adapt the complex lore of FNAF and just opted for predictable plot and cheesy things to appeal to children. Longtime fans who grew up with FNAF expected better, it was still a great fan service that was worth the wait, but not more than a 7/10 imo.
The movie was absolute Craaaaaaaaaaap!
No u are
I just feel like the fnaf community needs higher expectations 🤷🏽♂️
Everyone had high expectations
fr i've never seen a fanbase defend a very average (maybe below avg) movie.
@@rowdyfps I am a veteran fnaf fan and I think the movie is a bit garbage but it was OK
@@grathem9789same i give it a 6/10 maybe a 7
@@themagnificentorange672 yeah I give a 6 it's decent but not great or a masterpiece as everyone is saying it's great because theatre experiences are screaming and laughing at the movie not with the movie, shouting references make the theatre experiences a blast but movie itself below average
I think it was decent. But they could have made William a lot more scary if he used the knife more. I also think a hide and seek scene between Abby and Mike against William would have been scary aswell. But nah William went from a terrifying killer to an offensive lineman..
Offensive lineman 😂
Should have been more present in the movie maybe as a man with the rabbit it on that inconveniences mike in deadly situations but mike never knowing if he’s real or not. Then when he shows up from the shadows like he did in the end it would have been a more satisfying reveal.
They could have made the lightning more scary, and the angles were kind of boring, I think they could have made William an even scarier guy.
I mean yeah he couldve been scarier but to be honest i thought he was pretty scary in his entrance he walked towards mike slowly and then raised his posture, then out of nowhere he just ran at mike full speed, that part was really cool.
This movie was absolute dog shit and I have been a fan since first ever FNAF came out. Vanessa being William's daughter? Really? Mike carried the whole movie only his story made SOME sense and the springlock scene? I almost fell asleep.
SAME, THE LORE WAS ALL MESSED UP IN THE MOVIE... GARRETT WASNT EVEN KIDNAPPED
I hope they delve more into the horror seeing freddy bite the babysitter in half was wild I want more of that
I know right! I did NOT expect that at all but it was amazing! Not the fact that she got her head bit off ofc but just the fact they made that a scene.
I mean it was a thriller not a horror
@@Randomeditor.nicolehere its a great movie idc what genre its called this was just my wishes
I agree with most of your points, I just think you should keep in mind it was made for children and if you compare to horror movies made for children this is really top notch
Dawg there is literally on-screen gore and the word "asshole" used, I think they didn't know what audience to appeal to.
@@EmmetsPagepg13
@@EmmetsPagethats not really anything too intense for the ipad gen when you consider all the other bullshit they take in on the daily
@@EmmetsPage It really wasn't that gory. I admit it got me a bit but it wasn't nearly as bad as rated R scenes.
And mind you, I am literally someone who hates gory scenes and I am even saying this. That's saying something.
It’s okay, the most disappointing movie from last year
Saying anything bad about this movie is like a fucking crime in this community.
As a FNAF fan, I adore this movie to no end and appreciate how it was catered and made for me and others like me.
As a film fan, I still enjoy it, for the acting and the effects, a few of the scenes, but I’m disappointed it’s tricky for newcomers to really invest in and understand. I think it needed another 30-40 minutes, but I do have hope they’ll learn and make a sequel more appealing to general audiences as well as fans.
Tbh the movie had potential. They should’ve stuck to the animatronics being evil trying to kill the security guard and everyone else involved. It had potential that’s for sure. Only problem is it went into the wrong hands bc they did just about everything they could’ve to make it a bad movie…
preach
i thought Cinama Sins channel held the copyright for saying "Everything Wrong With..." video essays
I loved the movie, even if it wasn't with many gore well that isn't what FNAF is about. It did show the element of hidden mystery, it even showed a bit of kills but I did say that gore wasn't involved. The entire FNAF thing Mr.BrainPilot is that every story ends without any information. Scott has a way of leaving major questions which till this day some of the questions haven't been answer. To be honest I was way happy to hear your comment then others because everyone was complaining about The Red Eyes.
this movie isnso fucking corny and straight up hurts my brain at points
its sad how much of a kids horror movie it was
@@brainnuggets8601was it not pg13? Don't see it thru a lens of a casual
@@brainnuggets8601 it was pg13, not pg18 dude
@@DYELGAINZ i know, thats the point of why it sucks that it was for kids, because the actual audience is the teens and adults from 2014 who are now adults and older adults not some kids who just know them from shitty animations and monster school huggybwuggy crossovers, they were so focused on making sure it reached a wide audience even though theyvebhad a steady and decently loyal audience since years ago, even people like me who barely keep up with fnaf have said screw it and went to watch it anyways they, none of the kids who were being pandered to actually give a damn about it you could ask like 100 kids about fnaf and all of them would probably say, idk evil robot animals, and that they havent played a single game in the series and if they did it was probably security breach which is just cuz their mom or dad who played the games let them play and even then they probably stopped playing cuz they got scared, in the end all im saying is they wouldve done well without all the pandering to kids and family friendly horror movie asthetic
@@brainnuggets8601i aint readin allat but scott himself said the audience is targetted around 12 yr olds because a story about ghosts possessing robots makes you realise it sounds a little silly when you grow up
Jumpscare fell short? Yep they didn’t even try.
It was only three jumpscares and the exact same thing each time.
every reviewer ive heard on this movie: im a big fnaf fan but ive never played the games or know the lore.
yeah ok.
the movie was great but I will respectfully disagree with you. movies aren't supposed to go the same way as they did in the game/TV series for example in one piece live action all of the things in OP are different than in the anime. the reason why the fnaf movie is not connecting to FNAF 1 is to make new FNAF lore.
You make some good points but one thing I will point out is that the majority of FNAF fans are children so I believe PG-13 was the way the go.
That's fair!
already, your opinion is slightly biased at the start. but hey, im not here to shit on your parade, your opinion is your opinion and i have no problem with that. i liked the movie but just because i did doesnt mean everyone else should. we all have different thoughts. but yeah, it was weird that the critics score did not match up with the audience score but whatever
I can't tell if this follows the lore or the books more, this should've been a lot more gorey, I think it should've started from the back stories first, follow the lore and not so much the books. Anyone kinda mad William had a daughter named Vanessa and not Elizabeth? He isn't following his back ground. I dislike how much this doesn't follow anything through. I hope it does have another movie to maybe figure the rest of the story parts out.
i think the reason vanessa had a change of heart was because when she realised mike had a younger sister and lost his family she realised how tough it would be for her without mike
Bro hates the most best movie💀💀💀
I like some people are saying it’s not apart of the fnaf lore but it’s Scott who wrote it so he knows the story so this could be the canon lore
You could have made this cinema sins parody
nothing in this movie was mediocre. It was either really good, good, or disgustingly bad, such as the fort making scene and the uber skit. I love it so much. All of the gore was really well done, the scene where the springlocks activated and "killed" william was really well done, the first scene where mike beats up the kid's dad is amazing, most of the first half is great. It may not be a good movie, but it's really fun, and I would watch it again. I cheered for matpat by the way
Mike chosing to give up his responsibility isn’t exactly out of character cause its been established since the prologue that being so consumed with his past leads him to make impulsive actions.The real problem with that part is that his choice has no thematic weight to it because he still managed to save his sister regardless.
average fnaf vhs enjoyer, when the movie actually has a plot and isn't gore and jumpscare for 2 hours
(i agree with some of your points tho)
Lol, glad you agreed with some points though!
The movie was basically a rewrite of The Silver Eyes novel!
Not really tbh. I do see some comparisons but not entirely. In the novel Afton pretended to be a guard, in the movie he pretended to be a career counselor. And in the novel, Charlie's brother was never taken. That's just what Charlie thought, she was actually taken by Afton. But Mike's brother was actually kidnapped by Afton. And Mike was a nightguard while the novel was just a group of kids messing around and exploring a abandoned pizzeria.
Great video man! when I left the cinema I was wondering all day why was normal audience upset or consider it boring, watching your video really made me see why people criticize a lor of it, hope that if a second movie is made the narrative of the story is way better as well as the construction of characters.
Thanks a lot!
Its not a horror film. It's a biopic almost. A story. If it was a slasher it would have sucked.
/queue clear
@@UamiiVR ?
Its crazy that they spent so long making that whole set just to have it amount to almost nothing in terms of making the movie actually tense
I’m could not agree more!!
the scene where the babysitter died was a missed opportunity for a nice bite out of her skull. instead we got the cheesy clip of her being pulled in and bit in half.
I wonder how much control Scott had over this.
Totally think comparing something like the last of us too this is not fair because TLOU had a clear story from the jump and is a story based game. But yeah I can see how wanting to make it to where more regular audiences would enjoy it than just the fan base but again I hella enjoyed the movie I knew it wasn’t going to be pure horror because of the game
If you went in to see a horror movie you were disappointed, if you were in to see it for seeing a good (not great just good) movie, you enjoyed it. Admittedly it should have went R rated to be an actual horror movie. The division is what you expected in the movie.
There was rarely a sense of actual fear when you saw the animatronics, just intrigue. Not a single person in the movie felt truly scared of the animatronics.
in the games mike was the son of afton, vannessa isn't even a part of any of the old games. the movie didn't even really focus on the lore, it more focused on referencing the franchise.
I think they could’ve done a TV series of this instead and it could’ve been 10x better…I still enjoyed the movie though
Yeah i'd have welcomed a TV series for sure!
Watched it with non-fnaf fans and we both agreed that the movie isn't good lol the animatronics looked decent though.
Why didn't they make it lore accurate?
2:40 I was also told that the movie isn't for me too, cause I never played the game and that's why I didn't like it. Ironically, the youtuber penguinz0 has played the games and he gave the movie a 45% score I think
The best approach would have been to make a FNAF movie for the loyal gamers but also a great plot and characters for general audiences
Why was the movie different from the actual game lore?
I'm not a fan too, I only heard what the heck is five nights at freddy's is, From the "Rule 34".
That's the how i learned What is five nights at freddy's is...😂
this movie is a mistake... a mockery to the fnaf lore!
It is in its own universe and Scott wrote it soo…
The movie is good in my opinion as a fan
@@dumbasspepper35doesn’t mean it’s good
It’s not canon
@@supergalaxybros3781no one said that it was
I don't get what is the meaning of putting the children into animatronics. Does it mean the dead bodies were actually inside or just their ghosts? What happened to the bodies? The children might be treated as "missing" but how about the grown men and women killed and no one cared or asked about them? The most ridiculous was for the villain so eager to hire a night watchman - which was the most certain way for his secret to be discovered.
if it was exactly like the game it would have been so much better!!!
Soulless, bizarre(in a bad way), and strange to see Josh H. Getting crapped on by hostile females over and over.
I mean I absolutely loved it… 9.5/10 in my opinion… yes it couldve been a TAD bit better… but me personally I LOVED IT 🤷🏻
I’ve been a fan since I was like 9 and I’m 16 now btw
That's fair!
I wouldn't say the movie is bad, but I wouldn't say it was great either.
What really threw me off from really liking it was the shallow story, the over used themes, and cheesy themes , and possible plot holes the movie created??(no pun intended)
If you watch it again you'll notice the movie is mostly made up of a few types of scenes repeated 3 or more times. The foxy hallway scenes and the over use of the dreams. This movie was more about Mike dreaming than it was about his experience at Freddie's. I think it would have been great if he did fall asleep night one (its the easiest night in game after all) and the replace the dreaming at work with dreaming outside of work to keep that part of his story without sacrificing the literal name of the series. It would also get rid of some very unnecessary scenes that ways. He's still be able to interact with his sister too cuz he's not going to be sleeping all day and kids are prone to waking up adults when they need them lol. Also I feel like the worst part of this movie is the Freddy shreddy machine (yes I'm calling it that you cannot stop me)😁
Idk like I said I didn't hate the movie but it felt like there wasn't any passion put into it. I wasn't expecting this to be an answer solving masterpiece but eh, I was expecting a good movie at the least.The best part of the movie was MatPat coming on screen imo.
It's interesting, the plot points you pointed to as not making sense or not working etc... were plot points added for the movie that weren't part of the game lore.
Is ahead supposed to be spelled wrong in “spoilers ahead?” Or am I missing an inside joke
Fully believe the only reason why it wasn’t r rated was bc the franchise profits off children buying the merchandise
I just wanted the kids to have more than 5 seconds because I’ve always wanted to see the kids and the party to where it all happened where they all got fruit ninja’d by Afton. Even PG-13 still they could’ve had the screen turn black after the lured the kids into the room. Bc we see the kids and I just can’t sympathize bc I barley have seen them. I also wish Afton himself got more screen time with some flashbacks. Or at least more explanation. Rather R rated or not.
ending felt so rushed and goofy
Yeah it was so abrupt in the change of direction!
This movie was great people love to hate on anything nowadays
Nah this movie definitely had it's flaws
I highly disagree with your opinion because I never played any of the games and still loved every second of the film. I just finished watching it for the second time and cannot get over how amazing the plot is! I can understand some people not liking the film because it is more or less true fan service, but I honestly think that the movie was made as a thank from Scott. For those of you who don't know, Scott Cawthon has officially retired and will not be coming back to the franchise.
It didnt make sense to me but my dayghter who is a fan thought it was fantastic. She mentioned a discrepancy regarding the female cop beinng the bad dudes daughter.
To answer the part about Garrett, I think that he was most definitely given the "animatronic treatment" given the "IT'S ME" writing on the foggy mirror before the scene where Mike meets Vanessa, hinting to the fact that Garrett is reaching out to his brother in the form of Golden Freddy; a parallel to the games. I'd also have to disagree with you on the part about the Garrett plotline being most likely over with. When taking a look at the unresolved shot I mentioned, as well as the final message at the end of the movie ("C-O-M-E F-I-N-D M-E"), I don't think that the story with Garrett is through quite yet.
All in all, great video!
I prefer Willy's Wonderland. It's more faithful to the theme and lore of Freddy's. I saw this movie today on my birthday and there were only seven people in the theater including me and my husband. It dragged and made no sense. Pretty wrapping a garbage gift. I knew when they said PG13, It was going to be garbage. It's a watered down version suitable for families.
I wish it had more of the gameplay in it
My nephew was a fan of the game and he thought the something I thought, the movie wasn’t good
This movie was basically a FNAF themed shitpost
I honestly disagree. I liked how they did the movie and I think it was well done. My only problem is William Afton's sudden appearance in the Springbonnie suit. I wish he had more of a role. I know that he's not as present in the games either but still think there could have been more about him. The story also reminds me of The Silver Eyes novel. About Charlie's brother supposedly being taken by William Afton and the same happening with Mike's brother in the movie. At first I thought it'll be the exact same scenario where Mike thought his brother was taken but in reality it was him who was taken just like in the novel. But apparently that wasn't what happened and his brother was actually taken which I honestly think is better for the plot.
OK as a fnaf fan my self im not gonna lie i loved the movie but like you said the movie didnt feel like horror if like a none fnaf fan whos a horror lover watched this they will wonder why it was marked as horror it didnt feel like a horror movie that scares you and if they where able to make it so the fandom can gow with people who wernt fans to make it the best movie of all time this movie was more for fans of fnaf i wish it was like the last of us where it let people that wernt fans injoy it but it cant be changed but its still a good movie for me the fans lol
i just didnt like vanessa and how mike and her interacted she just shows up not explaining why and i know she has this secret about her past but whenever he asked her anything she would dodge the question and not in a sly way and when he pushed it she just deflected back and then hed drop it. there wasn’t any character development from anyone until mike in the last 15 minutes of the movie. pretty much no jump scares and not much of a horror element while fnaf is known for jump scares and people will say its pg-13 but so was lights out 6.43-10
I like it a little bit, but it didn't really feel like a fnaf movie to me. If it was like a fnaf movie mike watching the place and protecting himself with doors all 5 nights staying up. Maybe the sequel will be good, but I doubt it.
The set design and animatronics looks so good the movie Meh though
Yeah i'd agree with that. It did look really good!
Thanks for succinctly putting into words how I felt about this film and the response to it. Frankly if I were a major FNAF fan, I'd be pretty disappointed in this film. TLOU had to be adapted to fit the TV formula and if it hadn't I doubt it would be as popular as it is now. Lore or no lore, a film is not a game and it can't function the same way.
I think it would have been better foreshadowing if William aftons character was named Bill A. Instead of steve whatever
I agree. I really wanted to like this movie. I'm not a gamer, so I didn't know the lore either. I know the idea of the game is loosely based on the real life Chuck E. Cheese massacre from the 1980s.
it's not 💀
@@u9lyontopit is lol search it up
@@u9lyontopit is tho. It’s literally animal mascots at a pizza restaurant
@@legacysquid0625 one set of animatronics murders and the other doesnt
Honestly I feel like if you haven’t played the game once or haven’t seen the lore yet then you most likely won’t enjoy the movie due to the fact that you’ll need lore behind the game to experience the thrill and mystery of the movie and the game because that’s what the movie is based off of
I would suggest watching Willy's Wonderland with Nic Cage instead. The teens are annoying, but Nic kicks all of the ass.
If i had to give the movie a rating, I'd rate it a C+ they tried, but the way that they strayed from the games lore just made it feel like a cheap knockoff. Like afton willingly was wearing the springlock suit. Vanessa laying next to the animatronic suits (which had the corpses of children inside them) and so many other things. It started well and ended well, but the middle was just weird
its based more off the books that's what Scott said so if you didnt read the books you will probably say their is lore inaccuracies.
where the fuck is evan afton.
to be honest I loved it sm but the lore didn't transfer into the movie, for instance the ending, William has A daughter named Venessa?? and mike wasn't his kid in this??? IDK but as a fnaf fan for 6 years, idk abt the accuracy yk?
WE NEED CINEMASINS
Crazy that something like Willy‘s Wonderland did a better job at being FNAF than the actual FNAF-Movie 😢🫣
Not rly
@@loganrunner6231 Yeah it did, atmospheric/scary-wise and script-wise since they changed so much for this movie from lore and etc
Well yea, of course it did, first of all it was rated R, gives it more freedom with the scares and kills, and while it was based on fnaf, it didn’t have an established fan base primarily made up of kids
Didn’t like it. Wasn’t scary.
Yeah considering it was a horror I think it definitely could have meant into that more!
Let’s not mince words this film is Yaks Vomit 🤮
I think what was good about the fnaf series it was scary but also had lore to it if they tried to do the same with the fnaf movie it would've been better
It’s a great not too scary movies for KIDS
It would look less divisive if the percentages are put into perspective, 87% of the critics (including yourself) rated it 5/10 and 87% of the viewers rated it 6/10
Yeah if that is the case then it isn't divisive at all
I hated this i was a huge fan and it left me with a broken heart
The last of us was horrible
Noooooo
@@BrainPilot yessss
Tf u mean?! Everything is wrong with it, of course
I agree.
sometimes people need to remember that it is a MOVIE it's not meant to be an entirely realistic thing, that follows every "norm" in society.
10/10 love it
you have to to when sping shrap or tye actor sorry i frogot his name when he i always come back sheesh🥶 that hit difffernt
I love the movie it was not as bad as he said this guy complaining
Fake fan fake
The movie was good til the fight with the owner started and there were some bad plot points which u pointed out after the yellow bunny was introduced
The fight with the owner was legit the best part wdym😭😭
Just learn the lore