Thanks! RUclips provided a "transcript," but it is pretty inaccurate and lousy. It would be useful to myself and some others to have a quality transcript at some point.
Thanks, James. I wonder, though, whether it's really desirable for all things oral to be rendered into written text? Creating a quality transcript would be a good deal of work for someone - but perhaps we can be reassured that the AI isn't capable of doing the job! ;-)
@@dougald - It's a good point that assuming all things oral ought to be rendered in text is a lousy notion. Similarly, awful would be the notion that all things casual and intimate and non-recorded ought not be videographed and published on RUclips. As a writer who likes to make ample use of quotes, I was speaking from a desire to make easy use of pieces of this conversation. I suppose I'll be making my own transcription of pieces of this talk to quote in some future writing. Lots of very good, important stuff was said here!
Thank you, all.
🙏❤️🌍🕊🎶🎵
Thanks!
RUclips provided a "transcript," but it is pretty inaccurate and lousy. It would be useful to myself and some others to have a quality transcript at some point.
Thanks, James. I wonder, though, whether it's really desirable for all things oral to be rendered into written text? Creating a quality transcript would be a good deal of work for someone - but perhaps we can be reassured that the AI isn't capable of doing the job! ;-)
@@dougald - It's a good point that assuming all things oral ought to be rendered in text is a lousy notion. Similarly, awful would be the notion that all things casual and intimate and non-recorded ought not be videographed and published on RUclips.
As a writer who likes to make ample use of quotes, I was speaking from a desire to make easy use of pieces of this conversation. I suppose I'll be making my own transcription of pieces of this talk to quote in some future writing. Lots of very good, important stuff was said here!