Fischer defeated the USSR alone. We mean that he beat all the chess players in the USSR. BUT... When the Politburo declared Spassky a ''genius'' player and no one could defeat him, Petrosian said the opposite in 1971: After the Final of candidates, Petrosian announced - Fischer was a genius, and he lost the game to a genius. What's on his mind: let two geniuses play together now, I'm no longer the champion and I'm not worried about maintaining my title among the genius players. Petrosian was confident that Fischer would easily defeat the “genius” Spassky. The fact: When Petrosian was the champion, Fischer disappeared from chess life... And when Spassky became the champion, Fischer reappeared, since he knew for sure that Petrosian would not stop him, even despite the threats of the Politburo who gave the command to stop Fischer at all costs. Question - Would someone in Petrosian’s place have stopped Fischer? Answer - I admire that Petrosian did not pay attention to the orders of the Politburo - He was no longer a champion. This was already the concern of Spassky’s favorite Politburo who as a genius fell from the moon. And even in 1992, Fischer proved that Spassky is a simple grandmaster. And then Petrosian was no longer alive. Now you know the truth about the genius Fischer, who was truly a super player, and about the candidate Petrosian, who created the Fischer symbol against Russian antagonism, anti-Semitism, and imperial evil. Karpov was a super player as well. However, Fischer decided not to play Karpov. Fischer did everything he could and brought the chess mythology of the USSR to its knees. Therefore, there was no need to play Karpov with the younger generation. Fischer behaved as befits a genius. If you want to know more about Argentine matches, look for true sources outside the chess world. Thanks for your reading.
You might be to young to remember but Fischer beating the USSR was huge. I remember running home from school asking who won the game. It was a national big deal.Him beating Spassky was bigger then the Super Bowl. Thanks For all you do great video !!!
I was a kid but i remember that they were cutting between some skiing event on Wide World of Sports to the Fischer v Spassky tournament and i was like "huh, chess is a sport?"
Really glad you do these videos. For someone stuck at 2100-2300, these are more helpful for actually improving than most chess channels on this site. I appreciate the work you do man. Some months ago I beat my first GM in a simul (Jan Gustaffson!) and sadly have not repeated the success. As the old proverb goes, chess is hard. thanks for these vids mate
It was an equalish position and he had a winning line that I missed, he was able to sacrifice the exchange and trap my knight with a bizarre pawn move I never considered. It reminds me of the move Wesley So found to repel the vicious attack unleashed by Anand, though I must admit it was less of a victory than I would like, as grateful as i was to be able to play such a strong player, he was under much more pressure and playing many others in simultaneous games. it is humbling, though it is not my way to pretend it is equal to a one-on-one victory, he is far too strong and likely to have found a direct refutation of the idea. I just saw this response, and apologize for the long comment, but thanks a ton nevertheless! @@chessdawg
Probably worth mentioning that at this point Keres is 43 and (according to Chessmetrics) 5th in the world, whereas Fischer is only 14th. Of course, Bobby had just turned 16...
Yes agree it is worth mentioning. Fischer was still just a kid wearing scruffy corduroys and baggy woolly jumpers. Keres was a seasoned vet who should have been world champion if it wasn't for Soviet politics. He was Estonian and this counted against him.
I learned a lot from your explanation about the end game. Besides, I always enjoy your energetic description of the games. Thank you for sharing this beautiful game!
Best game presentation I have seen on YT. It pays more attention to the actual game (and thoughts), than to all the variations the channel owner can come up with. It is nice and advantageous IMO, to see how the best did it, as I am pretty sure Fischer would not have problems with the variations either.
Nice experience with Ruy Lopez,the endgame point which pawn to keep now learnt from continious one year watching experience of such brilliant games from youtube,thanks to all.
4:40 Wonderful vision. Easy to be complacent with such a board and defer instead to finding a strong positional move. At these levels though every crumb matters.
This Fischer victory against the 5th rated super GM when he was only 16 is quite similar to the losses suffered by Caruana and other super top 10 GMs in the last Olympics under the hands of young teenage GMs from India and Uzbekistan. And more recently, top-ranked Magnus was beaten by a low-rated GM in Dubai, I think. Not sure if he was a teenager. There is an 8-year old girl from England who beat a GM quite recently. In 20 years, there could be 100 super GMs all under 20 years old, maybe at least 10 having attained 2700 rating before they are 18. Alireza and 2, maybe 3, Indian prodigies have done that. These young kids can memorise 2000 games and openings with the help of computers. However, if Fischer Random Chess under classical time replaces the chess of today, these young kids will have greater difficulty attaining GM status early on. No opening lines, as a result, can be memorised and only the best natural talents will rise to the top. Memorised chess openings and home cooking are taking the fun out of chess. If you have a photographic memory, you have too much pre-advantage. I believe computers and memorization will prevent a human chess player from breaking the 2900 barrier in classical chess. Humans have reached the limit. Maybe this is why Magnus prefers rapid and blitz because he, and together with many other GMs, have cracked the 3000 barrier not with excessive difficulty. I'm willing to bet that nobody will breach the 2900 in classical in 50 years, assuming the Fischer Random has not replaced it, which would lower the benchmark even further down to 2800.
I am really bad at chess and not practising or learning, but if anything I can remeber is: Watching Keres' games is very instructive for dummies like myself. If I defended like Keres here in my dtupid elo for 3-4 moves, my opponent would probably mistake and let me equalise. In blitz ofc or 10 min games...
Keres was an extraordinarily talented attacking player in his youth, then later an all rounded strategic genius. Many top players fully expected him to become world champion after the war and were amazed how poorly he played against Botvinnik despite playing so well against his other rivals. Botvinnik was Russian and the Golden boy of the Soviet chess establishment, Keres was an Estonian. Was there similar dynamic going on to what occurred later between Karpov, the darling of the Soviet Chess politburo and the Azerbaijani, Kasparov.?
While it's true that Estonia was (very much unwillingly) a part of the soviet union Paul Keres is considered an Estonian and not soviet chess player in hes country. In fact hes image was printed in Estonian money after liberation from soviet union.
No wonder Keres asked his wife and kid to have Fischer's autograph as he predict Bobby would become world champion! And this game took place when Bobby was just 16! amazing!
Keres was my childhood/adolescent hero, I replayed all the games of his “thick book” with 100 games. As I understood the Russians had this Estonian on a leach, because he played some tournaments on Nazi-Germany territory, around 1943, like also Aljechin. Some believe this is the reason he never became world champion, if necessary him having to give way to Botwinnik. Sad for Paul Keres, if this is really true.
Sir, I do congratulate you for calling this opening its actual name after the Castilian player that made it a formidable weapon. At that time there was none Spain as a country but just in a historical, geographic and cultural sense the same as there was no Britain as a country until the 1707 Act of Union with Scotland. Coincidentally, in the same year 1707 the king of Castile, Navarra and Aragon started a _de facto_ union of his kingdoms issuing the New Plant Decrees by which Navarra and Aragon submitted to the laws of Castile. Yet, it wasn't until 1871 that the Kingdom of Spain was born by the proclamation of Amadeus I of the House of Savoy; notice that ever since, Spanish Kings are not crowned but proclaimed by the Parliament. Now I will enjoy your enlightening video.
Chess like most sports requires talent and experience. Bobby was 16 when he played Keres (who was a top Soviet GM at 43 years old!). This kid from NY was coming for Russian scalps and he would have them!
After Nh6 check white has a +.50 advantage which is TINY, equivalent to half a pawn. The move f5 which you think is great actually isn't, Bg7 is stronger.
Annoying you do not use standard chess move terminology. That just makes it more difficult to keep up with the moves since board grid is unrelatable to the game.
You’re to young to remember; we were quite worried that if Keres lost the Americans would see this as the hat that broke the camels back and launch a subsequent invasion.
NOTICE! The most important aspect of Bobby Fischer's chess career is not told, at least never told properly. if we understand the philosophies man has lived under and live under now, we can see that the philosophies of communism are taking over the world, and destroying Western Culture. The 2 clashing philosophies are communism vs individual liberty. So if we can understand that Bobby Fischer, a self taught "individual", totally destroyed the entire state/organized collectivist Russian effort in the game of chess, and never cheated, (like the Russians had to in 62 to beat Fischer.), we would understand that it is "individualism" that offers the greatest intellectual advancements. Evidently communists are not very bright. Which is why they have to use force to advance into a more free society, and destroy it's potential. I would have loved to see what Boris Spasky would have been able to do as a USA citizen of his time, where he was free to think. I see that man as quite the gentleman, who would have been a great American IMO.
For a question like this regarding modern chess engines, the answer will basically always be yes unless the position is VERY advantageous. Say +2 or over. With perfect engine play you can hold on an extremely long time.
@@sullywinn4225 I guess what I'm asking is...had Fischer actually identified an extremely long forced mate, or was there a way out with perfect play? Could an engine force a draw from that position, or was it hopeless?
@@marcd73 Lol basically the same answer. Firstly, extremely long forced mates are incredibly rare. An engine could most definitely force a draw in this endgame because it'd be playing a human. Someone as strong as Fischer MIGHT have a chance after Rxd6, which gave him a clear advantage. But 99 times out of 100 the human will make mistakes, even small ones, and the 3500+ rated engine will punish them and force a draw or even win. You're better off taking the engine out of the equation for your question because they're simply too good for humans these days.
This was a great game. I noticed It shows Fischer not even at his top level yet!! And imagine if Fischer had the help and train with today’s chess engines!! He would definitely be the GOAT!! To me, As a Fischer fan, I believe he is the GOAT!! If only he had that extra training by today’s chess engines. He would elevate to the level of God of chess 😂😂😂.
Fischer was a great player; unfortunately he was used by his Government when he was fit for the purpose, when he turned too independent as to be free, he was disposed of.
Fischer defeated the USSR alone. We mean that he beat all the chess players in the USSR. BUT...
When the Politburo declared Spassky a ''genius'' player and no one could defeat him, Petrosian said the opposite in 1971: After the Final of candidates, Petrosian announced - Fischer was a genius, and he lost the game to a genius. What's on his mind: let two geniuses play together now, I'm no longer the champion and I'm not worried about maintaining my title among the genius players.
Petrosian was confident that Fischer would easily defeat the “genius” Spassky.
The fact:
When Petrosian was the champion, Fischer disappeared from chess life... And when Spassky became the champion, Fischer reappeared, since he knew for sure that Petrosian would not stop him, even despite the threats of the Politburo who gave the command to stop Fischer at all costs.
Question - Would someone in Petrosian’s place have stopped Fischer?
Answer - I admire that Petrosian did not pay attention to the orders of the Politburo - He was no longer a champion. This was already the concern of Spassky’s favorite Politburo who as a genius fell from the moon. And even in 1992, Fischer proved that Spassky is a simple grandmaster. And then Petrosian was no longer alive.
Now you know the truth about the genius Fischer, who was truly a super player, and about the candidate Petrosian, who created the Fischer symbol against Russian antagonism, anti-Semitism, and imperial evil.
Karpov was a super player as well. However, Fischer decided not to play Karpov. Fischer did everything he could and brought the chess mythology of the USSR to its knees. Therefore, there was no need to play Karpov with the younger generation. Fischer behaved as befits a genius.
If you want to know more about Argentine matches, look for true sources outside the chess world.
Thanks for your reading.
You might be to young to remember but Fischer beating the USSR was huge. I remember running home from school asking who won the game. It was a national big deal.Him beating Spassky was bigger then the Super Bowl. Thanks For all you do great video !!!
What do you think about the way you treated him in his last years?
I think the government treated him very shamefully. A lot of people still really liked him me included
no tivo!?
The greatest stupidity was that USA , the state of democracy, destroyed Fischer for his (wrong) ideas, the same way that Putin destroyed his enemies.
I was a kid but i remember that they were cutting between some skiing event on Wide World of Sports to the Fischer v Spassky tournament and i was like "huh, chess is a sport?"
Your commentary is great. Very clear explanations without going too long down the alt routes.
Fischer was one of the most bad-ass American minds in history. He was literally the Kwisatz Hederacht of the Chess cinematic universe
Great video. I really liked how you showed the winning plan at the end, even after Keres resigned. Love your content.
Really glad you do these videos. For someone stuck at 2100-2300, these are more helpful for actually improving than most chess channels on this site. I appreciate the work you do man. Some months ago I beat my first GM in a simul (Jan Gustaffson!) and sadly have not repeated the success. As the old proverb goes, chess is hard.
thanks for these vids mate
I am really glad you are enjoying the videos. Jan Gustaffson is a very strong player. That is a nice win.
It was an equalish position and he had a winning line that I missed, he was able to sacrifice the exchange and trap my knight with a bizarre pawn move I never considered. It reminds me of the move Wesley So found to repel the vicious attack unleashed by Anand, though I must admit it was less of a victory than I would like, as grateful as i was to be able to play such a strong player, he was under much more pressure and playing many others in simultaneous games. it is humbling, though it is not my way to pretend it is equal to a one-on-one victory, he is far too strong and likely to have found a direct refutation of the idea. I just saw this response, and apologize for the long comment, but thanks a ton nevertheless! @@chessdawg
Aye bro
Whats your rating rn
Did you improve
Or still stuck?
2100 is very high for a casual player
Probably worth mentioning that at this point Keres is 43 and (according to Chessmetrics) 5th in the world, whereas Fischer is only 14th. Of course, Bobby had just turned 16...
whoah - yes, that IS worth mentioning ffs
Yes agree it is worth mentioning. Fischer was still just a kid wearing scruffy corduroys and baggy woolly jumpers. Keres was a seasoned vet who should have been world champion if it wasn't for Soviet politics. He was Estonian and this counted against him.
@@derventio2860 Keres is underrated nowadays because memories are short.
The Mason - Keres variation.
9😊@@brianbailey3374
Bobby Fischer is why I play chess. In 1972 I asked my father for a chess set for my 8th birthday. I have the same pieces today.
The game was named "Meat and potatoes" according to notes in "My 60 memorable games" - R.J.Fischer's book
You have great discussion on the attached significance of the matches with great detail. Thanks for your efforts
I learned a lot from your explanation about the end game. Besides, I always enjoy your energetic description of the games. Thank you for sharing this beautiful game!
Thank you for your kind words.
Outstanding analysis. Precise, entertaining, and conversational in tone.
Such a clear commentary makes the whole game possible to grasp and learn from. Thank you!
I'm an 80 yr old Patzer as Bobby used to call us. but I loved that ending. thanks for sharing. ECF.
Best game presentation I have seen on YT. It pays more attention to the actual game (and thoughts), than to all the variations the channel owner can come up with.
It is nice and advantageous IMO, to see how the best did it, as I am pretty sure Fischer would not have problems with the variations either.
Nice experience with Ruy Lopez,the endgame point which pawn to keep now learnt from continious one year watching experience of such brilliant games from youtube,thanks to all.
4:40 Wonderful vision. Easy to be complacent with such a board and defer instead to finding a strong positional move. At these levels though every crumb matters.
This Fischer victory against the 5th rated super GM when he was only 16 is quite similar to the losses suffered by Caruana and other super top 10 GMs in the last Olympics under the hands of young teenage GMs from India and Uzbekistan. And more recently, top-ranked Magnus was beaten by a low-rated GM in Dubai, I think. Not sure if he was a teenager. There is an 8-year old girl from England who beat a GM quite recently. In 20 years, there could be 100 super GMs all under 20 years old, maybe at least 10 having attained 2700 rating before they are 18. Alireza and 2, maybe 3, Indian prodigies have done that. These young kids can memorise 2000 games and openings with the help of computers. However, if Fischer Random Chess under classical time replaces the chess of today, these young kids will have greater difficulty attaining GM status early on. No opening lines, as a result, can be memorised and only the best natural talents will rise to the top. Memorised chess openings and home cooking are taking the fun out of chess. If you have a photographic memory, you have too much pre-advantage.
I believe computers and memorization will prevent a human chess player from breaking the 2900 barrier in classical chess. Humans have reached the limit. Maybe this is why Magnus prefers rapid and blitz because he, and together with many other GMs, have cracked the 3000 barrier not with excessive difficulty. I'm willing to bet that nobody will breach the 2900 in classical in 50 years, assuming the Fischer Random has not replaced it, which would lower the benchmark even further down to 2800.
It was of greater magnitude. Fischer had little support against what was a chess nation-state.
I do love how you present games. I remember this game. It was major news in New York.
Thank you for this great presentation. This was an incredible period in chess history.
In the position of 07:18 why didn't Fisher play the move Bishop to F5 taking the black pawn? Seems like a great move, am I missing something?
Big blunder. Black can respond with Rh6, attacking the queen and opening up a double attack on white's bishop.
I am really bad at chess and not practising or learning, but if anything I can remeber is: Watching Keres' games is very instructive for dummies like myself.
If I defended like Keres here in my dtupid elo for 3-4 moves, my opponent would probably mistake and let me equalise.
In blitz ofc or 10 min games...
Keres was an extraordinarily talented attacking player in his youth, then later an all rounded strategic genius. Many top players fully expected him to become world champion after the war and were amazed how poorly he played against Botvinnik despite playing so well against his other rivals. Botvinnik was Russian and the Golden boy of the Soviet chess establishment, Keres was an Estonian. Was there similar dynamic going on to what occurred later between Karpov, the darling of the Soviet Chess politburo and the Azerbaijani, Kasparov.?
Keep up the great commentaries 🙏🙏
Fascinating history and thank you so much!
I thought that would the the video about unforgettable "1. e4" move he played against Taimanov.
Awesome game & awesome analysis!
Thank you,
The second idea from ...f4 is to exchange the bishops with Bf5
BEST analysis of the Bobby Fischer saga since Agadmator’s OG Fischer saga!!!
Can you please find the Euwe-Alekhine game where Alekhine captured a knight with quote"the most hated knight of the match"
While it's true that Estonia was (very much unwillingly) a part of the soviet union Paul Keres is considered an Estonian and not soviet chess player in hes country. In fact hes image was printed in Estonian money after liberation from soviet union.
What a game!!! Multiple Pins and Tactics!!
Thank you! Subscribed! (Colorado)
Excellent commentary 😊
Fantastic Video
No wonder Keres asked his wife and kid to have Fischer's autograph as he predict Bobby would become world champion! And this game took place when Bobby was just 16! amazing!
4:22 reminds me of kasparov karpov 1990 game 20
edit 10 sec later: HAHAHAHA seems i'm not the first one to think of that
Nice, lol.
As I recall, this win got Bobby the nickname in chess of "The Dragon Slayer."
Keres was from Estonia
Context: Should have pointed out Fischer was just 16 years old.
Thank you for your expertise
"TERRIFYING" and "SHOCKING" or "SHOCKS" are the most used and abused clickbait words on RUclips and more and more people are FED UP with that!
Couldnt agree more
Yeah but we all watched anyways 😎
should be national priotity to fix this issue. Millions of people suffering every day from this ailment.
I think I missed which move exactly was "shocking" and "terrifying to the Soviet Union". Was it 1. e4?
instructive. good one!
Keres was my childhood/adolescent hero, I replayed all the games of his “thick book” with 100 games.
As I understood the Russians had this Estonian on a leach, because he played some tournaments on Nazi-Germany territory, around 1943, like also Aljechin. Some believe this is the reason he never became world champion, if necessary him having to give way to Botwinnik. Sad for Paul Keres, if this is really true.
Cool, thanks for the information.
Hey, good job. Maybe another minute at the end to wrap it up for us smooth brains would be nice. Subbing.
2 strong players.....understated
Sir, I do congratulate you for calling this opening its actual name after the Castilian player that made it a formidable weapon.
At that time there was none Spain as a country but just in a historical, geographic and cultural sense the same as there was no Britain as a country until the 1707 Act of Union with Scotland.
Coincidentally, in the same year 1707 the king of Castile, Navarra and Aragon started a _de facto_ union of his kingdoms issuing the New Plant Decrees by which Navarra and Aragon submitted to the laws of Castile.
Yet, it wasn't until 1871 that the Kingdom of Spain was born by the proclamation of Amadeus I of the House of Savoy; notice that ever since, Spanish Kings are not crowned but proclaimed by the Parliament.
Now I will enjoy your enlightening video.
By the way the idea of Bb1 is to play dxe5 ( and after dxe5 black s knight on d7 is hinging)
What is th "three-fold repition" rule in chess? Forgive my ignorance ...
I can never get through chess videos without running off to make a couple moves. Like crack
Fisher said he hates chess. Imagine if he liked it
Very good video
wonderful!!
Nice game.
Which move was shocking?
What is the name and ranking of the narrator?
Nh6 sac which allows White to fork Black's Knight on d6
It was great, thanks.
The Soviet Union very nearly collapsed after that move.
"I enjoy it when I crush a man's ego." -Bobby Fisher
Chess like most sports requires talent and experience. Bobby was 16 when he played Keres (who was a top Soviet GM at 43 years old!). This kid from NY was coming for Russian scalps and he would have them!
BRAVO !
After Nh6 check white has a +.50 advantage which is TINY, equivalent to half a pawn. The move f5 which you think is great actually isn't, Bg7 is stronger.
So nice. I love Fischer very much❤
Fischer started to eat his morning corn flakes with white vinegar instead of milk. This was his secret.
The height of the Cold War, very exciting (and dangerous) times. Glad the battles were on the chess board
Indeed!
We all just collectively hallucinated the genocides in Asia.
Bobby Fischer, the Great.
You spelled nazi wrong.
Subscribed
Very enjoyable
Thanks for the analysis. I could never have seen this end game. That's why I am a patzer. 😂
Hi Sir, how can i contact you persnol?
did you consider to speak out all moves to follow blindfolded?
Amazing!!!
And Fischer at that time was just 14 Years old!!!
He was 16, he was born in April 1943.
Annoying you do not use standard chess move terminology. That just makes it more difficult to keep up with the moves since board grid is unrelatable to the game.
I love Bobby Fisher
HOWLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL chess dawg, thank you great analysis
Fischer was 16 years old !!
Instead of spending so much money on military equipment, perhaps the U.S. should have sponsored Fisher since he represented us.
insane game
And this, kiddies, is why you study the endgame.
For an unranked amateur watching such chess is extremely frustrating. What is it these men see that I don’t? Sigh…
Everything, Everywhere, All at once?
first time I saw this game, thanks, can you analyzed a game that I played?
is bobby holding a bowl in thumbnail?? 😅😅
Endgame with Bruce Springsteen playing in the background
Yeah I'm sure everyone the USSR was shitting they pants by a move played on a game board.
You’re to young to remember; we were quite worried that if Keres lost the Americans would see this as the hat that broke the camels back and launch a subsequent invasion.
No, just the Chess people and the rulers.
Such naivety is sad
More important than you think.
Ignorance and inexperience is a dangerous combo @MonkeyDIvan
Fischer was a giant and the biggest ever
thanks for nice game
Which, then, is the shocking move...?
NOTICE! The most important aspect of Bobby Fischer's chess career is not told, at least never told properly. if we understand the philosophies man has lived under and live under now, we can see that the philosophies of communism are taking over the world, and destroying Western Culture. The 2 clashing philosophies are communism vs individual liberty.
So if we can understand that Bobby Fischer, a self taught "individual", totally destroyed the entire state/organized collectivist Russian effort in the game of chess, and never cheated, (like the Russians had to in 62 to beat Fischer.), we would understand that it is "individualism" that offers the greatest intellectual advancements.
Evidently communists are not very bright. Which is why they have to use force to advance into a more free society, and destroy it's potential.
I would have loved to see what Boris Spasky would have been able to do as a USA citizen of his time, where he was free to think. I see that man as quite the gentleman, who would have been a great American IMO.
Do modern chess computers offer a way of stopping Fischer's endgame?
For a question like this regarding modern chess engines, the answer will basically always be yes unless the position is VERY advantageous. Say +2 or over. With perfect engine play you can hold on an extremely long time.
@@sullywinn4225 I guess what I'm asking is...had Fischer actually identified an extremely long forced mate, or was there a way out with perfect play? Could an engine force a draw from that position, or was it hopeless?
@@marcd73 Lol basically the same answer. Firstly, extremely long forced mates are incredibly rare. An engine could most definitely force a draw in this endgame because it'd be playing a human. Someone as strong as Fischer MIGHT have a chance after Rxd6, which gave him a clear advantage. But 99 times out of 100 the human will make mistakes, even small ones, and the 3500+ rated engine will punish them and force a draw or even win. You're better off taking the engine out of the equation for your question because they're simply too good for humans these days.
This was a great game. I noticed It shows Fischer not even at his top level yet!!
And imagine if Fischer had the help and train with today’s chess engines!! He would definitely be the GOAT!!
To me, As a Fischer fan, I believe he is the GOAT!!
If only he had that extra training by today’s chess engines. He would elevate to the level of God of chess 😂😂😂.
i agreed its pure talent no engines n computer the GOAT even today magnus is just shit , with out engines magnus is apatzer like us
Thank you so much ChessDog
Fischer was a great player; unfortunately he was used by his Government when he was fit for the purpose, when he turned too independent as to be free, he was disposed of.
You speak american like a Belgian. Great video!
Fischer started to eat his morning corn flakes with white vinegar instead of milk. This was his secret.
@@mrfarts5176 😄
Yo dawg, I heard you like pins.
You can see Fischer will power to crash his opponent.
Which move was the "SHOCKING" move?
Yes - which move?
What is the name and ranking of the narrator?
Is it fair to say modern super GM's play endgames more accurately than Fischer?
great comments
Ain’t Keres considered the best player not to win the chip?
Nice game
What was the great move ? ?
Paul Keres not one of the greatest players in history, about at the level of a super strong GM like Averbach or Geller