THE GARFIELD MOVIE REVIEW | Double Toasted
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
- THE GARFIELD MOVIE REVIEW | Double Toasted - Today at Double Toasted we have our Garfield review. In this movie review we discuss the plot, how they don’t understand the Garfield character, Chris Pratt’s voice and more. What did you think of The Garfield Movie? Let us know in the comment section below.
#TheGarfieldmovie #garfield #garfieldmovie
SUPPORT US ON PATREON TO HELP US CONTINUE THESE SHOWS AND BRING YOU EVEN MORE CONTENT (ANIMATED) IN THE FUTURE - / doubletoasted
Get Your TICKETS For DOUBLE TOASTED ON BROADWAY (June 21st) - www.broadwaycomedyclub.com/sh...
For Any Business Enquiries please e-mail - doubletoasted@viralnationtalent.com
Want the toasty goodness? Then check out the DT MERCH STORE here:
www.teepublic.com/fr/stores/d...
Don't forget to check out the FULL SHOW over at www.doubletoasted.com 
Развлечения
At least with Bill Murray his voice does have a bit of a Garfield tone to it that fits the character, Chris Pratt's voice on the other hand...is just Chris Pratt, nothing Garfield about it at all.
Bill Murray Doesn't Remember Voicing Garfield & That Was His Biggest Mistake Of His Life.
So when Lorenzo Music does Garfield, that's his voice he uses for every role he's given, and everyone was fine with that
But when Chris Pratt did the exact same thing Lorenzo did years prior, that's a problem
@jtnetwork7852 Pratt doesn't have the voice. Its that simple.
@@thecunninlynguist At least he sounds more like Garfield than he sounds like Mario.
@@jtnetwork7852Yep, really dumb lmao
Korey's continued cosplay of apocalypse Ashy Larry for Garfield is working for me.
Ditto. Hopefully he goes from ashy to classy.
I thought he dressed as a Monday
My first thought was Papyrus from “Undertale”.
So this confirms my worst fears.
It's a generic animated movie with the Garfield name slapped on it.
yep. I think it could've/would've fared better as secret life of pets 3 or something similar
I saw the trailers where Garfield is going on adventures and doing action shit. All I could think was “Isn’t Garfield a lazy ass that just eats and complains?”
To be fair, even the Bill Murray movies did that. Not to the extreme as this film, but in the first movie, Garfield had to journey to the big city in order to get Odie back home.
Yep. I just don't think Garfield works in these long stories because he's not the kind of character you look to have any sort of arc or growth. That's just not what people find appealing about the character. In the original Garfield cartoons, you could dump him in all kinds of nutty situations and it'd work fine because the whole thing would be over in 5-6 minutes and it was about telling jokes, not taking him on some kind of journey.
The animated show kinda did this but less budget
@@michaelstrong5383 absolutely
Probably because you have a stock image of what Garfield is but truthfully they always had Garfield be active and go in adventures in animation form
Nobody will beat Lorenzo Music as Garfield! Rest In Peace!
I do miss him as well.
He is Garfield. 😢
Lorenzo *_WAS_* Garfield. Even when reading the comic strips, I still hear it in his voice.
I did like the nice Easter egg/nodd of the store being called Lorenzo music.
Lorenzo Music was the true garfield to me too. I still love those short movies from the 80's and 90's.
Here in czechia Vladimír Čech was the best Garfield voice, unfortunately he died in 2013 and was replaced by Jan Šťastný who's voice was different than Čech's but he was still far better than Michal Holán who voices Garfield in the new movie and his voice is just too young and energetic for Garfield
It already lost me with Chris Pratt voicing Garfield. Not that I'm on the "Pratt Hate Train", but he's the very last actor I'd choose to voice Garfield. I'd imagine Nick Offerman or H. Jon Benjamin as a better fit for the character.
Not only that, but it had 0 of garfield's character or mannerisms. It's literally cat mario the movie.
.
Yeah with something like The Lego Movie and even Onward, his voice and personality fits those characters and he’s really good in those. But when described Garfield: lazy, cynical, etc., I don’t think Chris Pratt. It kind of screams like the studio wanted a big star rather than someone who fits the character.
Pratt is boring ASF to watch fr
I fall asleep during any of his dialogue
Nick Offerman would've been perfect for the role!
Bruh Bob could 100% be a good voice for Garfield.. Dope idea
Chris Pratt is the wrong choice for Garfield, he doesn't have that 'sleepiness' in his voice like Lorenzo Music.
Yes absolutely and Chris Pratt doesn't have that deep voice for Garfield
They could just stop trying to make a movie about a comic strip character who appears in "comics" that are literally 3-6 boxes in length and don't often have a lot of dialog and, really doesn't have a "story". Garfield and Friends worked because it was an hour long Saturday morning cartoon that was broken up into 10-15 minute shorts at the most, none of which were continuations of each other.
the people who did the peanuts movie should have done this one
Too bad they got absorbed into disney.
@@thecunninlynguist i hate that disney buys things and just didn’t really make anything better it’s weird to me i get money u would think they would try harder
Why would they try harder when there is no one to compete against
Chris Pratt as Garfield. Massive pass for me. And I like Chris Pratt.
He was good as Mario I don’t see why it’s an automatic turn off
@@jaketylenolWell at least with Mario, he put on an accent instead of just his regular voice. Here, it’s just Chris Pratt as Garfield, although it’s probably direction and how he’s written, but it seems uninspired.
Nice enough guy, but his range is questionable.
@@gcolbypAnd Bill Murray to his credit, he did sounded and acted like the character even if the movies weren’t written well. He was trying.
@@jaketylenol cause he doesn't really try to be a VA. It's literally cat mario the movie
the charming thing about garfield was that he acted like he didn't care about nobody but himself and he didn't want to do nothing if he could avoid it. but if jon or odie were in trouble he would get up off his lazy ass to help them.
The fact that “Korey” STILL got his makeup on. Just makes this review the Best already😅🤣
Missed opportunity in not pulling a Garfiosa cosplay
Korey Looks Great in a Garfiosa Cosplay
I thought he was in Odie cosplay. Didn't realize he was dressed for Furiosa, heh.
Guess not enough time to change get ups when he's moving onto different reviews. I remember him wearing Stormtrooper uniform with cat makeup because presumably he knows he's reviewing Star Wars 9 and Cats on the same day.
Would have been legendary
All this tells me is Garfield isn’t a story that needs to be made into a feature length movie.
I think in the right creative hands, it could work. Maybe taking the elements that made the TV specials so entertaining and endearing and try combining them into one, feature-length continuous narrative.
I read that Disney nearly made a Garfield animated film back in the late ‘80s. The whole script was completed and was ready to hit production… till one of the executives reportedly got cold feet, thinking the film was too dark and scary for a Garfield story. It ended up being published by Jim Davis later on, independent from Disney.
I mean, there isn't really much you can do with the base story of Garfield. A chubby, lazy, perpetually complaining cat that lays around at home an eats lasagna all day. What movie-length plot could you possible make with that without it derailing into what this movie became?
I've been looking at other reviews of this movie, and it seems like all the critics have decided to come together to see who can creatively roast this movie the best
Lorenzo Music was the best garfield. RIP
Bro still dressed like Steve o on that voodoo skit
I thought he was Brian Griffin at first.
He dressed like a Character on the Old Reality Show, Black. White.
Worse than Murray? That would actually be an accompishment.
It is. It's barely a garfield movie. You can take out garfield pit of this and nothing would change. At least Murray had the garfieldisms
Murray was a good choice for Garfield those movies weren't his fault he at least sounded like Garfield
Exactly. That honestly scared me. Seems like the movie is tired than offensively bad.
@@evenhartwick4422 I mean, Lorenzo Music voiced both Peter Venkman and Garfield in the cartoons. Makes sense they'd get Bill Murray.
I like how they put up an "(as a cat)" graphic, after Snoop Dogg's credit, as if we wouldn't get the joke.
Right I don't get the joke
Garfield's dad is basically Heathcliff. The better orange cat.
They didn't even get the right Parks and Rec star. Nick Offerman would have been a great Garfield.
I sure do miss when voice actors were actually cast to play animated characters in movies.
Lorenzo Music may no longer be with us, but Frank Welker is more than capable of carrying the torch, as he has in newer Garfield cartoons.
But just like with "Scoob!", he was robbed of reprising his iconic role for a big budget film in favor for a more marketable casting choice. (For the record I'm referring to Fred not Scooby Doo.)
Shout out to Korey for dressing up like a war boy for the Furiosa review and then dressing up as soulless person for the Garfield review to fit the themes of both movies
This movie is one of the real reason why Bill Watterson does not want Calvin and Hobbes to be adapted or have merchandise of it. Also who would of thought that Mark Dindal was better at hand drawn animation than CGI animation.
Honestly, I don't blame Bill Watterson at all. I do wonder what he thinks about those stickers of Calvin peeing on stuff.
Its like Bill Watterson and Jim Davis are like the real world versions of Flash and Reverse-Flash.
It totally is. Garfield was probably never as good as Peanuts or Calvin and Hobbes but in its early days it had some recurring secondary characters , some continuity and good character traits. Also the tv specials were pretty good and Garfield and Friends was ok. Now there isnt any sense of continuity and most of the times they dont use the secondary characters. I havent wacthed the new tv shows and it seems that they use Arlene or Nermal there but for example I think they dont use Jon's family anymore. Thats what happens when the character becomes a product.
@@rober_toons By the way I am not saying I hate Garfield and I like Garfield (but not everything of it). I am just saying that Garfield had became a victim of it's success and it's merchandise that it went downhill and may be a real reason why Bill Watterson does not want Calvin and Hobbes to be adapted or have any merchandise of it.
@@Collageman90Bill Watterson is a mean cranky old man. There's nothing wrong with making merchandise from a popular IP. or making cartoon or movie adaptations. But Bill left a lot of money on the table. Jim Davis a billionaire. Calvin and Hobbs was never as popular as Garfield. Mainly because of Watterson's refusal to merchandise the IP. And it has also been C&H's detriment, as the comic strip has become forgotten about. Calvin is more known today for peeing on things.
Now you gotta do a Bad Movie Roast of the Bill Murray movie next week.
Both of them?
Nope.
@@johnwerner69yes both of them
@@Hectorferjr2why nope ?
@@lenindominguez1986 The two Garfield movies that Bill Murray did had a greater understanding on how to capture the essence of Garfield.
As soon as I saw Chris Pratt's name and the rest of the cast, I immediately knew it was solely a money maker, but I tried to give it the benefit of the doubt considering the success with the Super Mario Bros.
The Mario movie is very overrated. It's just a compilation of references to the games with a lackluster story. I knew it would sell though because it's Mario, and the visuals looked beautiful. They only picked Chris Pratt to voice Garfield solely because he voiced a character in a billion dollar movie. Everyone knows who is he because of how successful Mario was. They didn't pick him because he fitted the role for Garfield.
For a second, I forgot Korey dressed up for Furiosa and that he’s cosplaying as Snoopy for this review, as if he’s saying “GARFIELD MADE ME A SNOOPY STAN!!!”
They were trying to make Garfiosa a thing. Like they did with Barbenheimer. But Barbenheimer was astroturfed, and it took off. Garfiosa not so much.
"At best, it sounds like Some Dude."
STOP HIRING THIS MAN TO VOICE ACT!
I wonder how long will it take people to find out Korey is cosplaying as Mad Max Warboys
“Perhaps I treated you too harshly.”
-Me to early 2000’s CGI Garfield
All of these sequels and reboots yet we only got one “Shoot Em’ Up”, one “A-Team” and one “Losers” (the one with Chris Evans) film.
Amazing.
They should have made a Heathcliff cartoon. That would have worked perfectly for him. Heathcliff was sort of dangerous.
I can watch "Garfield's Halloween Adventure" right now on RUclips for free (or Garfield in Disguise or Garfield Goes Hollywood) with the original Lorenzo Music voice actor owning the role and I could have a great time! .. Or I could pay 20+ dollars to see the latest Garfield botch-up without a pause button for toilet breaks in a loud cinema with bored unsatisfied kids.. Call me old-fashioned, but personally I'll stick with Lorenzo Music 😄
I love your videos! Didn't know you watched double toasted!?
@@johnwerner69 Hi John! Hey thanks 😀 And yeah, Double Toasted gives a thoughtful yet funny, nuanced opinion. I really dig alot of their videos!
@@phantomstrider that's awesome!
Why hasnt anyone ever done a Heathcliff remake? As a cat cartoon, he was waaaaaay more raunchier…
Because people are dumb and would just compare it to Garfield, for obvious reasons.
@@LuznoLindo Heck I've even seen comments calling Heathcliff a Garfield knockoff despite Heathcliff debuted before Garfield and they both have completely different characteristics.
Garfield can totally get emotional xD it's not for the majority, but some Garfield specials can legit pull at the heart strings.
The character was never completely heartless.
Edit: also seems bias to paint Garfield as heartless with the only few examples where he made a comment of "dragging someone out in the street and getting shot" when it's obviously meant to be hyperbolic, not to mention I can imagine grown-ups saying something like that in the late 80's early 90's without the same weight or sensitivity we give it today. (And don't tell me you've never fleetingly thought something extreme while at the peaking point of annoyance.)
THANK YOU. I feel like they and a lot of people on the internet have grossly misinterpreted Garfield’s character and taken it at face value when so many comics, shows and special show there’s a bit more depth to him. Being cynical and lazy are more so things he enjoys doing rather than who he is.
The Garfield on the Town tv special was this movie done right, funnier and more emotional too. He met his mother instead of his father. For some reason the special didnt show the dad and this movie didnt show the mother. I get trying to do your own story but maybe expanding and updating one of those tv specials may get better results all things considered.
The one holiday special was good
@@rober_toons That one actually made me shed a couple of tears! (Never in my life thought Garfield could make me emotional) Garfield's VA really sells the surprise and sadness, there's such a sense of emotional honesty it's difficult not to get a little taken in by it. Plus, as you said, some legitimately funny jokes in the writing
@@steveross2868 It's flanderization by the general public; they condense the surface aspects as if that's the entire character. It's a real shame, cus it takes away from the character's true potential.
At least they mentioned they're not "Garfield Purists", so they give Garfield the same level of recognition
as our own parents do.
They read Garfield in the newspapers or comics like once or twice and the rest is them filling in blanks themselves.
It’s pretty sad that this was directed by Mark Dindal, who did The Emperor’s New Groove, one of the funniest, not just Disney movies, but animated movies ever. But he also did Chicken Little, which was terrible, and it sounds like Garfield is more on par with Chicken Little. 😬
woof
The more previews I've seen from this movie, the more "Chicken Little" vibes I get from it especially from the jokes. And that's not a good sign.
It seems that Dindal really enjoys characters telling the story and breaking the fourth wall and slapstick humor. This is a bit better than Chicken Little, at least Garfields dad was kinda likeable and not a horrible guy like Buck Cluck. But I kept expecting this to become funnier like Emperors New Groove cause there were some of the same elements just done worse (the villains have some simmilarities too).
Chicken Little was not really his fault though, as that had heavy executive meddling by Disney which resulted in his original story becoming something more “hip” and different than he envisioned.
@@Alberto9HerreraWell didn’t Emperor’s New Groove had production issues too? And look how that turned out.
I for one am shocked that Snoop Dogg would be involved in such an obvious cash grab.
Hahahah
Snoop Dogg will literally do anything man
Movie was pretty blah. Saw the early screening last week. Pratt being a bad choice aside, this characterization of garfield was not garfield...at all. Garfield was too nice!!!! He treated odie like a friend. This film was like they inserted garfield into it, but it was an already made movie... they knew it wouldn't sell so they needed it attached to an IP.
Eh, Garfield was still cynical and sarcastic in this film, but not as much as the 80s specials and Garfield and Friends. I mean, Garfield has been on friendly sides in adaptations, but he still had his self absorbed and slouchy attitude.
@islesofforeignrails7917 he was sarcastic in this? He was more jovial and nonchalant then anything. Or maybe Pratt is just that bad. I felt nothing with him and vic. That was ripe for sarcasm. But he was more like you left. Ok.
@@thecunninlynguist+ sarcastic at times, yes. But, even the cat himself has laidback moments, but i don't think he was that jovial just a little hammy
In most of the television specials he treated Odie as a friend. And he does abuse of Odie here at least in the first act. And Garfield was kind of grumpy during most of the movie. But what felt off to me is that they set up the whole thing about him being lazy and a house cat and his father being a street cat...but then what happens is mostly Garfield being kind of a loser or dumb or getting hurt all the time. Its not him being lazy or not knowing about the street life, its just making him kind of a loser for not reason. Even Odie outsmarts and rolls his eyes at him and Odie may not be as dumb as Garfield thinks he is sometimes but its certainly not very smart. Here hes kind of cool and a genius. I actually think he was less likeable than his old idiot but faithful and loyable personality.
Nick Offerman would have been a better choice.
Perhaps we treated the Bill Murray Garfield Movies a bit too harshly?
This overused comment would be funny if they didn’t say it themselves in the video
@@py16667 oh my bad but I actually like the 2000s Live Action Garfield Movies imo
Me too and don't treat bill Murray harshly @@Mr.Feather130
Not really
@@47Cartoonguy oh jeebus...
In all fairness the live action films had product placement too. Wendy's, Petco, even name dropped Chuck E Cheese
It’s more soulless now
As if it wasn't in 2004?
@@47Cartoonguy no, cuz 2004 was a great year period
Garfield and Friends is an American animated television series based on the comic strip Garfield by Jim Davis. The show aired on CBS as part of its Saturday morning children's lineup from September 17, 1988 to December 10, 1994
God damn I nearly dropped my phone with laughter seeing Korey 🤣🤣
John carbunkle?? Wow. Just...wow
Why does Chris Pratt keep getting selected to voice these characters?!
He’s popular right now.
Brand recognition
Ask a voice director...
Because star power
He's the Terminator's son-in-law
Papa Shango in the House.
😂😂
Korey got dipped in kitty litter for the Garfield Movie.
I ll stick with garfield and friends and the comic stripes 😅😂
Right? smh Garfield and Friends is all I think about when it comes to Garfield. There's nothing else that even comes close and that short clip Korey showed is what I'm talking about.
Always found that title ironic since Garfield doesn't even know any of the animals at U.S. Acres.
@@LuznoLindo The show makes several jokes about that though.
We need I'm Sorry John the Motion Picture
Hard to watch the review in public with Korey dressed up as the ghost of cocaine past 😂
Lorenzo Music will always be the true Garfield. That voice is iconic.
Chris Pratt is the worst "voice actor" currently working in Hollywood. Absolutely no one comes close to how bad he is as a "voice actor". If you were to rank them, Seth Rogen is #4, because Pratt occupies #1-3. Chris Pratt is objectively just an insult to real voice actors and nothing more than that.
I miss studios using Voice Actors.
He was good in The Lego Movies and Onward, and he was fine in Mario. With this, he was more miscast where with those, at least with Lego Movie and Onward, his voice fits those characters.
He gets a pass for his Lego Movie performances. First one came out a couple months before Guardians of the Galaxy, which went on to make him an A-list star, which I think helped make his performance seem way more genuine than most other animated productions he has been a part of.
@@gcolbyp lego movie, yes. Onward, meh. Mario, no.
The LEGO Movie, at the very least, was self-aware about casting him as Emmett, who is supposed to be portrayed as a normal everyman.
Guys, I love ya, but I feel like y’all kinda misunderstood Garfield as a character. The whole internet I believe has for quite sometime.
Being cynical, lazy, eating lasagna, etc. are all more so his hobbies and things he enjoys but they’re not who he is as a character.
Across all the various comics, shows and specials it’s been shown there’s a bit more depth to the character and franchise that people give it credit for.
Garfield can be energetic, he can willingly be active if he chooses to be (he’ll pull pranks on Jon, fuck around with the mailman, and even have quite the imagination where he’ll pretend he’s a superhero by the name of The Caped Avenger or something like else) and YES he can be extremely sentimental and caring.
Hell, the first Garfield special that was ever made has a climax where Garfield tries to break Odie out of the pound because he actually misses him. Not only does he fail to break him out and ends up getting himself caught, he’s told by one of the cats in the pound that they’re gonna EUTHANIZE Odie the next day and there’s nothing he can do about it.
Upon hearing that news you know what he does? He tries to comfort Odie the best that he can and spends the rest of the night looking out through the window of the pound thinking about the time they’ve spent together as a kitten and puppy up until that point while a sad song about not wanting to say goodbye plays.
And I’m not even gonna bring that brief existential horror series of comics Jim Davis did with Garfield in the 80’s during the Halloween season where he flat out says that Garfield’s biggest fear is having no one around at all.
And on the topic of the ridiculousness of the story? While a whole heist film starring the character seems like a strange plot for Garfield, he’s been in weirder stories that have put him even more out of his element.
He’s met aliens, ghost pirates and GOD. This is relatively tamed for him. The franchise walks more along the lines of Looney Tunes when how absurd or cartoonish it can get. It’s never been as “down to earth” as people who’ve only read like 10 comics and seen like one special or one tamer episode of the 80’s show assume it is. That’s more like taking the franchise at face value.
You're right buddy - it's only YOU who truly understands all of Garfield history, and everyone else is wrong. Yep. You got it all. "THIS ONE TIME HE MET ALIENS SO THIS TOTALLY MAKES SENSE". Fuck out of here and touch some actual grass.
THANK YOU
Did Korey ever fix his GameCube?
I think they missed a huge obvious slam dunk by not casting Jim Gaffigan as Garfield. A huge part of his comedy is food and laziness. Man is basically human Garfield
If they just cut and paste this cat with heathcliff, while keeping everything exactly the same, I bet it would have worked way better😅.
Such a tiny detail could have done wonders!
His Name Is John Arbuckle Korey & Cast Of Double Toasted.
I've gotta take my son to see this over half-term. Looks like I better take a sleeping mask and pillow.
Bill Murray is the hero we need for this movie. Ghostbusters 4: Frozen Empire already made $199 million.
What if this was all AI...what if the plot was AI...the shot choice was AI...the voice acting was AI...
Why is Korey cosplayin' as Quan Chi?
That would be Korey lol
Is it because of the Furiosa movie they already reviewed?
Lmao
This is movie just like their cat in the hat movie. The people who produce this just filling in time. Like CITH the book takes 10-15 mins to read and they have to make 1 hour 30 mins film.
Korey looking like papa shango from back in the day🤣
Uh oh!Snoop Dogg's in it?I gotta see this! -SAID NOBODY.
Wasn’t Olive Garden in the first Sonic movie, too?
This reminds me of Scoob. More effort into getting the celebrity voices than the story.
Let's see how many cat puns get dropped during this movie review 🙀
Fellas, I always watch your reviews, BUT after I finish mine....because I don't want to accidentally include some of your ideas in mine. Normally, there is very little overlap, but you and I saw completely eye-to-eye on this one. WE both mentioned specific things like "Garfield purists," "Fargo," "IP for a new generation," "not even about Garfield," etc. It was just cool to see such aligning views, but I don't know HOW you keep me entertained for over 30 minutes. Well done as always.
Directed by Mark Bindal who also directed Emperor's New Groove and Chicken Little
Garfield movie should be him on a couch eating lasagna
The Garfield movie was actually great. I love that we finally got to meet Garfield's father, and how caring he is. I am glad that we got to see more character development for Garfield. And I am glad that they showed that Odie is a lot smarter than he seems.
Who care if Chris Pratt voices Garfield? It was not a problem at all.
Because they could've gotten an actual professional voice actor in his stead.
@@LuznoLindo Who cares? It was still great.
I didn’t watch this stream and I clicked on this review forgetting that Korey was in costume for furiousa. Immediately jump scared.
Garfield doesn’t get out? He did a few times on the Tv series although it to service the silly plots. Garfield can’t be emotional? What about the moment he reunited with his mother. There are more posibilites to the property when done right… But yeah, this movie got some things wrong.
I can tell Korey hasn’t watched the Garfield specials or Garfield & Friends in a long time. His descriptions of the character sound completely based upon three panel comics.
Face it. There’s no better Garfield than Lorenzo Music. He left a permanent mark on our memories.
I wonder if this would have worked better as a Heathcliff film. Heathcliff already has a father who is a crook.
Bill Murray isn't here to save Garfield this time.
And that's because Bill Murray himself confirmed the most he regretted role he did is Garfield. Of course he's not going to come back for him, even though now lot of people want him back
Outside Lego Movie, does Chris Pratt have one good voice acting role? Because he just doesnt try.
I say Onward he was pretty good in. And I thought he bounced off Tom Holland well as the brothers.
I liked Onward and The Super Mario Bros. Movie.
When an animated movie proudly lists Snoop Dogg in the trailer's cast list, that might as well be the kiss of death. No offense to Snoop, it's just a cheap gimmick for laughs that's gotten really old.
Even the third SpongeBob movie was guilty of that, and he just shows up as himself in it.
And they named him snoop Catt. Cringe
And what's sad is the director of this movie is Mark Dindal (director of Emperor's New Groove). Unfortunately, he also directed the awful Chicken Little movie, so it would make sense that this Garfield would suck too.
Korey still looking like Ashy Larry!!
You just saved me 8 bucks, Korey. Thank you and your War Boy makeup.
I never thought I'd be dying alongside garfield a tale of two kitties
Kory looks kind of like Geoffrey Holder as Baron Samedi, in the James Bond movie "Live and Let Die".
Glad to watch CP voice acting on the big screen again
This movie is secretly a masterpiece. Think about it? Garfield's biggest character trait is that he doesn't give a fuck? The filmmakers didn't give a fuck either, thus perfectly capturing the spirit of Garfield!
I think the "Its for kids" reasoning is an excuse, and a poor one at that. You go back around 30 years and a lot of animation and kids cartoons had a nice variety of jokes, lessons, and general content that you could look back on and find a deeper meaning to. Not saying all animated movies have to be that way, but how many of them are like that today? It feels like more and more of them are going for colorfully, whimsical, dumb-down entertainment for the pre-adolescents and calling it a day. That shouldn't be the standard.
He's more HeathCliff than Garfield in this movie!!!
I love when you’re still in costume for the second movie.
10:20 Jon Carbuncle lmao
As soon as Chris Pratt was named to voice Garfield I knew I was not going to see this movie in any way shape or form... So I appreciate this review because this will be the closest I will ever watch it.
I'm very glad you brought up the Peanuts movie, which turned to be a surprisingly great animated film with a creative animation style for being the obligatory cgi.
Apparently there's a video that explains why Corey is in white face but I haven't seen it so it was random and surprising to me. I went back and was disappointed he didn't have it on for the MJT video. That would have been REALLY funny to me.
The bull and cow getting together is adorable... even if it's ridiculous.
They belonged to a Disney film.
If possible they need to make a property out of Garfield minus Garfield. That one is hilarious in a bizarre way.
It's actually John *Arbuckle*. Just... just pointing that out.
Korey looks like Macauley Culkin from Home Alone.
Why does Corey look like a powdered donut? 😂
I think Captain Underpants did a better adaptation than this Garfield Movie.
Kory is still in ghost makeup? This was taped yesterday I guess?👻🚫😺🐈
I liked this movie fine. It’s alright, but not outright awful.
Listening to the movie premise, this is basically 1992's "Tom and Jerry The Movie" all over again.