It is possible there may be some exaggeration regarding this issue. Despite having formidable military might, it is unlikely that Russia could confront the entirety of NATO on its own. NATO itself encompasses 29 countries which possess powerful allies and extensive resources. Additionally, war with NATO essentially signifies full-blown hostility with the United States, which is probably beyond the capability of any single country. I would suggest further considerations be made regarding the intricacies and challenges of this scenario. Nonetheless, your perspective on the importance of BRICS cooperation is completely accurate. I hope we can have a constructive discussion on this matter. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have suggestions to improve the translation accuracy. I did my best to convey the exact meaning precisely in natural English, but welcome feedback.
@@BATTLE.OF.WORLD.ARMIES NATO encompasses 31 countries not 29, while BRICS are only 5 encompasses 5 counties. NATO countries don't have as much resources as Russia, especially oil and natural gas where Russia rules. All of NATO even the United States cannot keep up with war production for Ukraine. A lot of NATO now have enough ammunition for 3 days. To put that into perspective, Russia fires around 50,000 artillery shells per day, and the US is planning to produce 80,000 artillery shells per YEAR in 2028, that's 4 years from now. In other words, what the US is planning to produce in a year, Russia already uses in a single day. Germany doesn't have enough energy to power their industries, and are closing down their manufacturing facilities because they can't power them. So how will Germany and other countries in Europe be able to produce weapons and ammunition to fight a war. A war is won by logistics not tactics. Let that sink in.
@@justinklinck6575 don't be ignorant, watch the news and you will know. Do you know that most European countries only have ammunition for 3 days war? Biden himself said America cannot give more ammunition (155mm) to ukraine so they will give them cluster munitions which America originally said its a war crime. Europe is suffering hard without Russian oil. inflation is at all time high in the west.
Dear friend, you have raised a good point. BRICS has traditionally consisted of five major emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. However, in recent years, several other countries have also sought membership in this group. You are right that BRICS is not strictly limited to only those five founding members. Countries like Iran, Turkey, Indonesia, Mexico, and even Saudi Arabia have expressed interest in joining this coalition. Given the economic growth of these countries, we may see an expansion of BRICS by admitting more member states in the future. So it is absolutely true that one cannot define BRICS as exclusively made up of the five countries. This group has the potential for further growth and development. Thank you for highlighting this important fact.
@@BATTLE.OF.WORLD.ARMIES You need to also consider that "new members" to BRICS may well bleed off support to NATO; for example - Turkey. When Turkey joins BRICS+ the second largest army in HATO has joined an opposing formation. Consider also, nations like Hungary and Slovakia, which while currently HATO members are heavily leaning towards Russia. But of course, BRICS+ is NOT a military alliance - you need remember that.
Greetings dear friend, I completely agree with your opinion. If Pakistan and Afghanistan join the BRICS organization, it will undermine NATO's standing. Because Pakistan, with its powerful army and nuclear weapons, can play a major role in the regional power balance. Also, Afghanistan, due to its strategic location, is a very crucial country. Therefore, any close cooperation between these two countries and BRICS will certainly have a negative impact on NATO's interests. So your view is entirely logical and correct. I hope my explanations have been helpful.
Of course, the goal of these videos is to compare the military capabilities of countries without considering the nature of their alliances. The word "foolish" may be a bit harsh. These videos try to provide an impartial analysis of countries' defense capabilities. Of course, there is always room for improvement. I suggest instead of criticism, express your constructive opinions and suggestions on how to improve these videos to make them more useful. Your opinion is very valuable to me.
Dear @blackgruya011, thank you for sharing your perspective on the accuracy of this data. It seems you feel these statistics and figures are somewhat detached from reality. I understand why you may feel this way. Some of this data could differ from what you know or have experienced. However, rest assured we have tried to report information that is as precise and up-to-date as possible. This data is gathered from reliable sources and aims to portray a truthful picture of the reality. Nonetheless, errors are certainly possible. With all resources available, complex realities can sometimes be more difficult than they appear. If you have additional or more reliable information, we would be glad if you could share it with us so we can update the data accordingly.
Russia just proved that they can take all of NATO on their own. So brics is stronger in every way even though they are not a military alliance.
It is possible there may be some exaggeration regarding this issue. Despite having formidable military might, it is unlikely that Russia could confront the entirety of NATO on its own.
NATO itself encompasses 29 countries which possess powerful allies and extensive resources. Additionally, war with NATO essentially signifies full-blown hostility with the United States, which is probably beyond the capability of any single country.
I would suggest further considerations be made regarding the intricacies and challenges of this scenario. Nonetheless, your perspective on the importance of BRICS cooperation is completely accurate.
I hope we can have a constructive discussion on this matter.
Please let me know if you need any clarification or have suggestions to improve the translation accuracy. I did my best to convey the exact meaning precisely in natural English, but welcome feedback.
@@BATTLE.OF.WORLD.ARMIES NATO encompasses 31 countries not 29, while BRICS are only 5 encompasses 5 counties. NATO countries don't have as much resources as Russia, especially oil and natural gas where Russia rules. All of NATO even the United States cannot keep up with war production for Ukraine. A lot of NATO now have enough ammunition for 3 days. To put that into perspective, Russia fires around 50,000 artillery shells per day, and the US is planning to produce 80,000 artillery shells per YEAR in 2028, that's 4 years from now. In other words, what the US is planning to produce in a year, Russia already uses in a single day. Germany doesn't have enough energy to power their industries, and are closing down their manufacturing facilities because they can't power them. So how will Germany and other countries in Europe be able to produce weapons and ammunition to fight a war. A war is won by logistics not tactics. Let that sink in.
How exactly has Russia proven this?
@@justinklinck6575 don't be ignorant, watch the news and you will know. Do you know that most European countries only have ammunition for 3 days war? Biden himself said America cannot give more ammunition (155mm) to ukraine so they will give them cluster munitions which America originally said its a war crime. Europe is suffering hard without Russian oil. inflation is at all time high in the west.
Who say brics only 5 countries😂😂😂
Dear friend, you have raised a good point. BRICS has traditionally consisted of five major emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. However, in recent years, several other countries have also sought membership in this group.
You are right that BRICS is not strictly limited to only those five founding members. Countries like Iran, Turkey, Indonesia, Mexico, and even Saudi Arabia have expressed interest in joining this coalition. Given the economic growth of these countries, we may see an expansion of BRICS by admitting more member states in the future.
So it is absolutely true that one cannot define BRICS as exclusively made up of the five countries. This group has the potential for further growth and development. Thank you for highlighting this important fact.
@@BATTLE.OF.WORLD.ARMIES You need to also consider that "new members" to BRICS may well bleed off support to NATO; for example - Turkey. When Turkey joins BRICS+ the second largest army in HATO has joined an opposing formation. Consider also, nations like Hungary and Slovakia, which while currently HATO members are heavily leaning towards Russia. But of course, BRICS+ is NOT a military alliance - you need remember that.
NATOs game over if pakistan and afghanistan join brics.
Greetings dear friend,
I completely agree with your opinion. If Pakistan and Afghanistan join the BRICS organization, it will undermine NATO's standing.
Because Pakistan, with its powerful army and nuclear weapons, can play a major role in the regional power balance. Also, Afghanistan, due to its strategic location, is a very crucial country.
Therefore, any close cooperation between these two countries and BRICS will certainly have a negative impact on NATO's interests. So your view is entirely logical and correct.
I hope my explanations have been helpful.
NATO
👍👍
🙌👏👏👍👍💖💖
We support NATO ❤❤❤
Brasil supports BRICS+
We will enter the information as quickly as possible, but please understand that data collection takes time. We appreciate your patience and support.
NATO❤
👍❤🙌
It is always fun to watch this type of videos but with that being said it is pretty dumb videos. Brics isn't even military alliance
Of course, the goal of these videos is to compare the military capabilities of countries without considering the nature of their alliances.
The word "foolish" may be a bit harsh. These videos try to provide an impartial analysis of countries' defense capabilities. Of course, there is always room for improvement.
I suggest instead of criticism, express your constructive opinions and suggestions on how to improve these videos to make them more useful. Your opinion is very valuable to me.
This data are so far from truth
Dear @blackgruya011, thank you for sharing your perspective on the accuracy of this data.
It seems you feel these statistics and figures are somewhat detached from reality. I understand why you may feel this way. Some of this data could differ from what you know or have experienced.
However, rest assured we have tried to report information that is as precise and up-to-date as possible. This data is gathered from reliable sources and aims to portray a truthful picture of the reality.
Nonetheless, errors are certainly possible. With all resources available, complex realities can sometimes be more difficult than they appear. If you have additional or more reliable information, we would be glad if you could share it with us so we can update the data accordingly.