Idaho 4 Will Motion to Strike Death penalty prior to Bryan Kohberger Trial be successful
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- Tarot reading into the current energies of motion to strike death penalty prior to Bryan Kohberger trial. Will Anne Taylor be successful?
#idaho4update #bryankohberger
Alleged, not fact
The deadline for Anne to challenge the DP was 09/05. She had to submit motions now.
I think something on his phone will help his defense.
This case is very dark, so much we don't know. The trial will be illuminating. Thanks MT ❤
I do believe The defense the prosecution and the judge were all working together on what to show the public in this trial. But I think and got fed up of looking like a foolish and incompetent attorney, I believe she went rogue and decided to really represent Kohberger to Bill and John’s surprise and now the judge isn’t letting anything the defense presents slide.
Could anyone answer for me why the defense didn’t want to show that Kohberger was stalking?
Bill T even said BK didn't stalk the victims. I've not seen any evidence that he even knew them personally. Time will tell.
🕊🕊💙🙏🕯🦋🦋🦋🦋🕊🕊
Hi Mademoiselle Tarot! Good to see you...Beautiful deck you are using...Your nails are so beautiful ❤
Hope everything is OK with you and your family! Much Love💜💕
@marlenec4536 thankyou, yes we are all fine, life gets busy sometimes, ♥️💫
🦋🦋🦋🦋
I wonder if the big change is the change of venue decision.
They were granted a change of venue I believe. I could be wrong bc I didn’t pay much attention but I think it was still Sunday here (before midnight) I scrolled past a vid with that as a headline.
@Swishwish79 I haven't heard but I do believe it would be a good idea
They haven’t been granted it yet via the court; however, it looks like the granting was leaked to the Goncalves family and in their regular fashion, they are blasting it all over social media in an attempt to sway the judge to change his ruling before it’s published. I apologize to Kaylee’s spirit but I think her family is completely out of line. They are tampering with this case on so many different levels, it’s not even honorable. Jmt
@@mademoiselletarot1927 just searched google and the judge did grant the chance of venue. Not sure where the case could be tried as it’s gotten so much attention.
I believe AT wanted to reprimand State
I can loosely explain part of this. The dp is assigned with the original charges because ID allows for it due to the severity of the case. I can explain this from watching the Delphi case. ID is a DP state and the prosecutor as a representative of the state charge BK with specific charges. At the arraignment, he stood silent. The judge entered a plea to keep the trial moving forward. In Indiana where the Delphi case is being held, the state is required to provide special defense due to the DP charge. It's part of BK's charges; at this point, we're still responding to pretrial demands, and she has the ability to ask for it to be dropped. Maybe they don't have enough hard evidence, more than likely it's because they can use the DP as a bargaining tool. If he wasn't the only person or if he can provide his own provable exculpatory evidence, then maybe they can reduce the charges before the trial and then also charge a possible second suspect. The state can say, if you give us the name, we'll take the DP off the table. I don't know what the circumstances are for her to request the change or if a change of plea is coming, but that's the more than likely the outcome. However, you questioned why they want to do this before the jury has decided. Even if the jury finds him guilty, they don't have to sentence him to death. It would more than likely be life with or without parole depending on good behavior. But also, in Indiana if a case is a DP charge, then the defense has to have special credentials and has more training than a regular criminal defense attorney.
@@tippyhadroncollider thankyou for that information ♥️💫
hearings go for so long...ugh
@ev7841 it's frustrating everyone, I can't even imagine what the families are going through
@@mademoiselletarot1927 right. i totally feel its him... but this POS still want to avoid the punishment
Why? Is you cameras all screwy at times ?
Judge Judge is trying to be extra cautious in granting a COV because he doesn’t want an appeal, which is automatically given in Idaho when the DP is involved… his dream team already said in one of their motions that they will challenge the DP if he’s found guilty. Personally, I believe he will be found guilty no matter how his dream team tries to muddy the waters surrounding this case. Most of the evidence points to him and only him, in spite of the fact that we don’t know what other evidence the prosecutor has… I also believe BK is running his defense. Most of the motions filed by his team are nonsensical, from trying to object to the evidence needed by the grand jury to return an indictment to the death penalty being cruel and unusual punishment! Nearly all these arguments are a waste of the courts time and the taxpayers dime.
@@moxiedrapo2391 absolutely
@@moxiedrapo2391 all DP cases get automatically appealed. Even the most obvious ones, which I think is absurd. If you did something requiring the DP and it’s blatantly obvious, you shouldn’t get to appeal. Most DP cases end up being life sentence until you die in jail bc of how long you can ride out the process.
Do you feel she has found heavy evidence that it wasn't him or that he wasn't alone? I feel like she wouldn't be asking for the DP to be taken off before trial especially if they have a lot on him, that just doesn't make sense. 🤔 Nice read. 🫶🏻
I think so too