Aparently, at the times of The Arachosians, Arians, Bactrians, Zarangians, Sogdians, Medes and EVEN older than those. Balkh was a very influential City that aparently compited against Babylon
Balkh was a very influential City that aparently compited against Babylon what you means by this where can i search the detail of this beautiful information
well never conquered and subdued by foreign forces most of these empires are originating from in Afghanistan or they are turkic or indo aryan who afghans share dna with
None of Achaemenids, Mauryans, Greeks, Scythians, Parthians, Kushans, Turks, Mongols, and Mughals priginated from Afghanistan, and they subdued and ruled over afghans for centuries. So yeah, afghanistan is the graveyard for afghans only
@@abdullahnasir2882 achaemenids are Persians, Greeks never subdued afghans and that’s coming from Alexander himself who btw married an afghan roxana so the afghans would accept him, mauryans never ruled Afghanistan so idk where you are getting that from, Turks did not rule either and suffered great loss at the hands of hotaki empire and were forced to make a peace treaty, and mongols although may have sacked the afghan cities but did not govern outside the cities which is where majority of afghans actually live and let me remind you mongols suffered their first defeat at the hands of alaudin khilji an ethnic Pashtun who was ruling over much of India and thanks to him mongols never were able to successfully campaign in India so kid next time learn your facts before opening your mouth don’t talk down on any afghan because we both know no matter where you’re from your people have never fought with the capacity that afghans have against super powers and I’m betting your people don’t have the rich history either 🤫
Modern Afghanistan was a land that was conquered by Empires but never existed til 1747, it is now 247 Years old and is already having a difficult time controlling themselves
This is an astonishing video that is definitely the best map animation on RUclips on Afghanistan! But I have to say a few things: 1. You forgot to map the Tribal Rebellion from 1944 to 1947. 2. There is an image of Babrak Kamal; it's just undated. 3. There is an image of Mullah Omar. 4. Despite keeping an exceedingly low profile, there is an image of the current Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada which is also undated.
As far as I was able to dig in, there are more 4 images of him I was able to find of him (two confirmed, one uncertain, and another one alleged by several journals but which doesn’t look like him to me).
@@aaauuuplove Iraq. I wish to visit Baghdad, Samara, Basra, najaf, Babylon and fallujah one day. The land of civilization 🇮🇶. As an Afghan myself people always mistake me as an Iraq due to my looks 😂❤
history of Afghan and history of Afghanistan is two diffrant history Afghanistan history is 350 years but Afghan history is thosnats of years Afghan empire 1 ghandara 2 kushan 3 aryana 4 ghorid 5 Delhi sultanat 6 sultanat of bangal 7 suri empire 8 hotaki empire 9 durrani Empire
@@ASWAR9622delhi sultanate and bengal sultanate was afghan This guy is a mental patient Bengal sultanate is a perso bangladeshi empire delhi sultanate is a turkic empire Ghorids are turks Kushan are hans turk not afghans
0:33 I think the Iron Age/Avestan period should have had states in the area of Avestan speakers divided up according to the traditions of the Avestas and Early/Pre Iranian traditions.
There were no state societies in iran or middle east Only India had and also India's broze age 3300bce India iron age 1200bce Only vedic kingdoms were states
@@nothingexists5066 The Fertile Crescent (Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon) was mostly made up of large states since the IIIrd millenium BC, Anatolia (Turkey) had large scale states from 1800 BC to 1200 BC and then again from 800 BC onwards. As for Iran, Elam was a large state in what is now Fars, Luristan and Khuzestan from 2050 BC to 1100 BC and smaller states existed in those regions from 2600 BC to the Achaemenid empire, which originated in Fars. What OP mentioned were regions that are listed in avestan scripture (thus similar to vedic Mahajannapadas), that make up most of Iran. It is probable those were countries and not states though, since no ruler is mentionned, but we know society in some regions (Bactria and Margiana for example in modern Turkmenistan and Afghanistan) cities were so big that it is highly likely they were the capital of some large state. India had city states like the Middle East from around 3300 BC to 1700 BC in most of the Indus bassin, but we don't know if those were part of large states. After 1700 BC most of those cities disappeared, Lothal was the only major one left and disappeared around 1100 BC. Then deurbanized vedic states appeared, but those are similar to how things were organized in Iran, since the culture was similar too, its only with the growth of the Indian population and the reappartition of cities around 800 BC that they started to be large urban states. I don't know what nationalistic bullshit they teach you but its not right.
1126 requires its Brahman recipient in “Maniyara” to pay the tax called turushka danda “Turk's duty”, which seems to imply that tribute was paid some 70 years before the Muslim conquest of North India Burton-Page, J., n.d. Indian Islamic Architecture: Forms and Typologies, Sites and Monuments (Handbook of Oriental studies =. Brill Academic Publishers, p.158.
@@nenenindonu Yes but if you take the Persians out of the Ghaznavids you have a bunch of Turks with expensive clothes in a palace, not a state. He was referring to at this time specifically the Persians were truly islamified.
Another video the same mistake, no such thing as Turko-Persian Seljuks or whatever this term refers to a governments culture not an ethnicity have you heard a use like Seljuk Turko-Persians instead of Seljuk Turks ?
@Los Blancos lol, I am Pashtun and did DNA test and it says my ancestors were Hephthalites. then I checked Hephthalites and it says they were not eastern Asian people, they had European characteristics, and they were known as white huns.
@Los Blancos you have mistaken the term huns with white huns. there is historical evidence suggesting white huns not have eastern Asian origin. My friend who is Turk(Hazara) did his DNA test and it shows that he is 50% eastern Asian and the rest central, mine shows 97% central Asian, and my ancestor's y chromosome matches with malta boy in Siberia. the white Huns joined the Huns invasion, the Huns had different colors for different types of huns, the original ones who were mostly Mongolian had wore red, while the white color worn by the eastern European Huns, the white Huns were the nomads living in Russian pastoral lands. check the video on white huns and you will get more information. somebody has made a video on it too.
@Los Blancos I don't know what you just typed here, but before you say I am wrong at least do some research. Huns were eastern asian people, Turks were northeastern Asian, and Mongols were northeast Asian. the white Huns had no genetic similarity with the Huns. the Huns were not only the confederacy of the many east Asians but also in later years many nomads living in south Europe joined them and they had no DNA or character similarity, I have blond hair, and many in my family have blue eyes.
The video is great but the descriptions look like they were written by an iranian diaspora member. It is really pathetic to claim Turkic states as if they belonged to them.
Unfortunately, there is Wikipedia propaganda. For some reason, you used Persian, Pashtun or Turco-Persian expressions for Turkisc states. I suggest you remake (and impartially) the video. It's not nice to support history theft.
Maybe you should accept that it's impossible for your cCc Türkiş cCc empayırs to protect their identities without proper Turkic settlements where the dynasties rule.
@@papazataklaattiranimam That's a power move. But that doesn't mean majority of the region they rule is Turkic majority. The dynasty is Turkic, the people they rule over are Persian. This makes them Turco-Persian.
@@papazataklaattiranimam You are right, Nader Shah is originally of turkic decent, he identified himself by his home province however, but no doubt that he is turkic. HE ISNT Azerbaijani though, azeri is a modern umbrella term for turks born in azerbaijan, Nader Shah is just turkic.
There are Korean captions, which makes sense. If this weren't a map video, the English subtitles would help for a visually-impaired audience (so a program can read them aloud), but this IS a map video, so IDK what the visually impaired would be doing here at all
Kambojas were not Hindus Hindus indo aryan and Buddhist describe them as melchlas which is word used for non Hindu non aryan non vedic people they practice animal sacrifice which historians link to zahoristian they speak Old armo Iranian laungue Hindu indo Aryan see kambojas very badly bcz they eat meat even they their presit told their women to stay away from them
nega horazm davrini o'tqazib ko'rsatmasdan yuborasizlar.ifloslar....Hali ko'rasizlar yana Xorazm yuksaklikka ko'tariladi.Butun osiyo va afriakni egallaydi....
@@Saljuqid1040 bruhhh ilkhanate culture is mongolic. The Ilkhans considered nomadism to be better than urbanization, so they have no special structure, and in the end, being influenced by Islamic culture and becoming a Muslim, all the soldiers were not Turks, most of them were Mongols.
Shut up i am ghilji and i have nothing to Do with turk like the turk in turkey you can See they Look the same but not me bruh steal history from other hahaha poor ppl
조선이 1882년부터 1894년까지만 청나라의 속국이였고, 나머지는 독립을 유지했다는 사실을 알려주셨으면 합니다. 중국과 세계가 조선의 1882-1894 청나라 통치 시기와 그 나머지 독립시기를 혼동해서 한국이 고려시대부터 1000년 동안 중국의 지배를 받은 괴뢰국(puppet state)이라고 알고 있더라고요. 그런 것을 설명하는 외국의 한국사 영상은 조회수 100만을 찍기도 했습니다.
From the state of many comments, this video requires a remake. I'd wager that not enough research was done into this topic beforehand. As for the contemporary portion of the video, it should be slowed down so the text boxes line up with the map changes.
The video is fine, its mostly afghan and turk nationalists arguing over things like “aaaa khaljis were turk and not pashtun” (which they are afghan) or just complaints about other labels.
@@amanullah1290 It appears that Khaljis in 13th century did not identify themselves as Afghans. The poet and court historian Amir Khusrao (1253 - 1325), mentions the bloody wars of Jalaluddin Khalj against his enemies including Afghans ; "... He (Chhajju ) must have heard how from Ghazna, Kirman (Kurram), and Barghand, I have extended my conquests as far as Darband; how I have issued orders for the shedding of the blood of my enemies, who have become like worms, when they hear the whizzing of my Kirmani blade; how, at ono time, from the heads of the Mongols, I have filled my cup with blood, and stuck their inverted skulls upon the top of my standards; how, at another time, my spears have wounded the Afghans, until the hills resounded with lamentations ; how, at another time, I made the blood flow in Janjuha, so that a boat might have glided within the hills of Jud. The Hindus themselves cannot conceive how full I have made hell. What did that ignorant thoughtless man imagine, that he dared advance his foot into my territory?' ["Miftah-ul-Fatuh" as translated by Elliot] As the poet was particular favourite of Sultan Jalaluddin and as his works were read in his presence, Amir Khusrao would not have made this hard remark against the Afghans, if the Sultan and his courtiers identified themselves as Afghans.
Afghanistan belongs to Persian civilization. Persian, Turkic and Mongolian meet in Asia. For example, Kazakhstan comes from a Mongolian Empire, but Kazakh belongs to Turkic. The Mughal Empire (he originated in Afghanistan, but he lived in India and Pakistan) is named after Mongolia, but he speaks Persian.
i would have appreciated an outline of current afghanistan so i can figure out which cities lay today inside the country and to what extent afghanistan was controlled by X politie
4:02 you marked Iran there which is nice, but Iran does not speak Arabic and I just want to point this out, we speak Persian and many other languages I just ask can you please fix your mistake and I know that it is a common mistake to call Iranians Arabs but we are not
@@zyT175 I already told you one ashok piller is near Tajikistan border with Afghanistan And north west part of afghanistan is also controlled by greeko bactria kingdom it's also vassal state of maurya king
@@zyT175 you are not reading my comment properly brother I said maurya ruled kabul kandhar and north afghanistan but in Western Afghanistan there was a kingdom called greeko bacteria kingdom And maurya liberate that kingdom from selucus nicator a Greek general And made this greeko bacteria kingdom their vassal ( it's like indirect control over them and they paid taxes to maurya king) So 70 %afghanistan under direct control and 30 % afghanistan under indirect control Just like today Chinese autonomous region tibet Or Xinjiang
Bro, for your kind information 👇 Panjshir resistance/northern alliance do not control any district. They are hidden in caves. Especially all districts of Panjshir include capital city was under Taliban control since Sep-2021 Even their leader Masood & Amrulah Saleh has fled Afghanistan
2:07 Hunas were already Turkic people therefore they couldn’t be Turkify. More recently, it has been argued on the basis of Chinese sources that the Hephthalites were of Turkic origins and later adopted the Bactrian language after settling in Ṭukhāristān.
I thought it was relatively well known the Hephtalites were of Iranic origin from the now extinct Iranic peoples of Central Asia, closest related to the Tajiks.
@@papazataklaattiranimam yeah, I am pretty sure it is something still being argued around by modern schoolars and not just the exact same theory from the 60s.
@@Teapoid mihirakula is iranized Turkic name. And Hephthalites first Turkic people in the Afghanistan. There is a lot of evidence that the Hephthalites were Turkic.
@@Teapoid if u look at the earliest Hephtalite coins, they had clearly slanted eyes. Also the Chinese depicted the Hephtalites as beardless whereas the Persians and other Iranic people where always depicted with a beard.
I cannot see Ghuria khel confiderataion, yusuf zai state of Pakhtunkhwa, Sadozai Sultanate Herat , khilji khanate of Kalat (Ghazni) ,Turklani state of Khushal Khan Khattak confiderataions(Independent states) between Mughul and Safavi map 🧐 . search mughal Afghan wars and Afghan safavi wars
*1978* Communists: "I have seized control of the government!" Mujahideen: "Allow us to introduce ourselves." *1992* Mujahideen: "I have seized control of the government!" Taliban: "Allow us to introduce ourselves." *1996* Taliban: "I have seized control of the government!" US Army: "Allow us to introduce ourselves." *2021* Taliban: "I have regained control of the government!" NRF+IS: "Allow us to introduce ourselves."
@@Respect-cp1ly with all respect, first civilization was in the region of Sumeria (Actually Iraq) where Zoroastrianism was founded. Where do you get that source ?
Islamic India: the role in the continual power struggles of different groups within the ranks of the Turkish invaders. Ethnically the Khaljis were Turks, but because of their earlier migration from the Turkish homelands they constituted a group quite distinct from those who had come into the Ghazni and Ghuri areas at a later time.
안녕하세요. 작품이 너무 훌륭합니다. 한국사 한번 더 만들어줄 수 있나요? 조선은 그전까지는 독립국이었고 1882부터 1894년까지는 청나라 종속국이었다는데.. 이거 한번 읽어보시죠. 외국인들에게 한국사를 알리는, 높은 조회수를 얻을 수 있는 한국사 영상을 만들어서 한국사를 외국인들에게 다시 알리는 계기가 되었으면 합니다. Although the Joseon dynasty considered 1392 as the foundation of the Joseon kingdom, Imperial China did not immediately acknowledge the new dynasty on the Korean peninsula. The rulers of Joseon sought to legitimize their rule through reference to Chinese symbolic authority. In 1401, the Ming court recognized Joseon as a tributary state in its tributary system. However, The Chinese tributary system was a largely symbolic Confucian world order with its basis in trade & philosophical relations between foreign states & various Chinese dynasties. Its relation to the sovereignty of some states was flexible & diverse. Larger states (e.g., Joseon Korea & Japan) enjoyed full sovereignty in both domestic & foreign affairs, & their international status cannot be considered 'dependent states'. The Qing government stated that "Joseon is both a vassal state and a independent state" when France and the U.S. asked if the war with Joseon would lead to an invasion of the Qing Dynasty, if the Qing Dynasty would intervene, and the nature of Qing-Joseon relationship. However, it was the position of Joseon, the Western world, and Japan that tributary states such as Joseon were virtually independent countries at the time. The Chinese tributary relationship was not a 'dominance-subordination' relationship, but rather a kind of 'patron-client' relationship that protected or assisted each other to prevent such a relationship. However, Qing, which began to turn its policy toward Korea substantially changed to a new imperialistic one where the suzerain state demanded certain privileges in her vassal state in the wake of Opium War, established a China-Korea Treaty of 1882 (中朝商民水陸貿易章程) with Joseon after the Imo Incident. The treaty stipulated that Joseon is a vassal state of Qing and the Chinese government began to turn its former tributary state into a semi-colony. Korea was became to a semi-colonial tributary state of China with King Gojong unable to appoint diplomats without Chinese approval, and with troops stationed in the country to protect Chinese interests. thereby the subjugative influence over Joseon by the Qing Dynasty was started. The political influence of the Qing Dynasty ended in 1894 with the First Sino-Japanese War.
@@Hindustaniyoddha089 They only controlled the southeast of the country for a little over 100yrs through a peace treaty with the Greco-Bactrians for 500 war elephants. Please don't come here and pretend you know history when your source is Bollywood movies...LOL!
being a helmandi myself, it feels really proud that far back 5000 years ago people lived in the same place, woow, though i know we might not be the direct descendants of them but at least we have to have a little substance of them, which in itslef is amazing
2:20 = "... And forced the Buddhist Turk shahis to convert to Sunni islam in 815." It's a non sense in the Coran the forced conversion is forbidden this a sentence is a lie 🤥 the Afghans embraced with choice and were convinced by islam.
So Afghanistan was created by the incoming Indo-Iranians of whom the Nuristanis are the fathers and Iranians and Indo-Aryans the two sons . Indo-Aryans create Vedic Hindu society and Iranians create Medo-Persian Zoroastrian society. Eventually Buddist Kushan indoeuropean peoples from western china invade and spread buddism. Then The Persians invade and persianize it, the greeks hellenize it and spread greek culture, then it becomes a melting pot of zoroastrianism, buddism-greek and hinduism…before the Turks invade , and then the arab muslims come and the buddists give up but the hindus dont until the indigenous saffarid pashtuns become muslim and then all of afghanistan becomes muslim . The turks keep invading until the mongols come , and then afghanistan is stuck between the turkic-mongolic Mughal Indians, the Uzbek Bukhara and the Shia Persians, and thats when Afghan Bactrian Pakhtun Independence comes from. Ever since the Hotaks, amd Durranis and Barakzais rule afghanistan, the Soviet Union and British Empire arrive to make Afghanistan their own, they both fail and their son the USA and NATO try, and also fail to subdue the Afghan Taliban who wish to rule by sunni islam.
You almost got it right here. Another funny thing to know is that the Shahi kingdom centered around Kabul, both the Buddhist and Hindu ones, were actually Turkic tribe who initially adopted Buddhism when the Kushans ruled and then, through an internal coup, converted to hinduism.
@@JessicaHooks28 Its not PaSHto… the SH sound was adopted after the Persian leadership who changed the original KH sound which was hard for them and changed it to SH. So PAKHTUN becomes PASHTUN. and the word PAKHTUN is the original name of the people . Its what the Greeks call BACTRIA. they changed the P sound to a B. So it was called PACTRIA but im guessing the Greeks also couldn’t say the KH sound so they changed it to CT …so PAKHTRIA becomes BACTRIA, the land of Pakhtun or Bactrians.
@@ChachiMogo if pashtuns are indigenous well then Afghanistan was vedic then Buddhist then hindu. Even nuristanis and kalashis are dardic vedic hindus. The only time where paktha was seen in rig veda was as a darada group just like nuristanis. It wasn't iranic until acheamid invasion and persianisation happened where the dardic Hindus got iranised. Pashtuns are a byproduct of both. You can't find any zoroastrian evidence in southern Afghanistan. Iranic = zoroastrianic. It's mostly vedic Hindu and Buddhist references for southern Afghanistan which is were pashtuns are located.
Great video! Glad you included all the flags for this one; Afghanistan’s had an obscene amount of flag changes.
Aparently, at the times of The Arachosians, Arians, Bactrians, Zarangians, Sogdians, Medes and EVEN older than those. Balkh was a very influential City that aparently compited against Babylon
where can you research about this
Balkh was a very influential City that aparently compited against Babylon what you means by this where can i search the detail of this beautiful information
@@wbkids8204 what are you on about
@@Hdawg600 i said that where can i search for this
and can i say that the people of Balkh were Bactrians the modern Pashtuns?
And now remember the myth that "Afghanistan was never conquered".
Mongols?
well never conquered and subdued by foreign forces most of these empires are originating from in Afghanistan or they are turkic or indo aryan who afghans share dna with
None of Achaemenids, Mauryans, Greeks, Scythians, Parthians, Kushans, Turks, Mongols, and Mughals priginated from Afghanistan, and they subdued and ruled over afghans for centuries. So yeah, afghanistan is the graveyard for afghans only
@@abdullahnasir2882 achaemenids are Persians, Greeks never subdued afghans and that’s coming from Alexander himself who btw married an afghan roxana so the afghans would accept him, mauryans never ruled Afghanistan so idk where you are getting that from, Turks did not rule either and suffered great loss at the hands of hotaki empire and were forced to make a peace treaty, and mongols although may have sacked the afghan cities but did not govern outside the cities which is where majority of afghans actually live and let me remind you mongols suffered their first defeat at the hands of alaudin khilji an ethnic Pashtun who was ruling over much of India and thanks to him mongols never were able to successfully campaign in India so kid next time learn your facts before opening your mouth don’t talk down on any afghan because we both know no matter where you’re from your people have never fought with the capacity that afghans have against super powers and I’m betting your people don’t have the rich history either 🤫
Lol it was widely spreaded myth
afghanistan would've been an excellent place to visit if it weren't for the sudden instability in the 70s
cough cough *soviets* cough cough
@@callmevbuck4054 followed by the Americans (plus its allies) as well.
@@callmevbuck4054 USSR and USA, two sides of the same (imperialist) coin
@@amlans5314
And the British first.
Hunas are already Turkic 😂😂😂😂
Modern Afghanistan was a land that was conquered by Empires but never existed til 1747, it is now 247 Years old and is already having a difficult time controlling themselves
This is an astonishing video that is definitely the best map animation on RUclips on Afghanistan!
But I have to say a few things:
1. You forgot to map the Tribal Rebellion from 1944 to 1947.
2. There is an image of Babrak Kamal; it's just undated.
3. There is an image of Mullah Omar.
4. Despite keeping an exceedingly low profile, there is an image of the current Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada which is also undated.
Yeah, I was trying to add the Taliban in AOH2 and I was also trying to add the leader so I went to google and found an image of Akhundzada
As far as I was able to dig in, there are more 4 images of him I was able to find of him (two confirmed, one uncertain, and another one alleged by several journals but which doesn’t look like him to me).
@@CreeperEditz1unexpected aoc2 damn
Also, Afghanistan was a part of Mauryan Empire untill it's fall. At the Mauryan times, Afghanistan was as Mauryan Kandahar.
3:10 perso mongol Ilkhanate ? pashtun Khalaj ? Wtf bro
Öhhhh
Proud of my beautiful country Afghanistan AFGHANISTAN ZINDABAD 🇦🇫🇦🇫🇦🇫💪💪
🇮🇶❤🇦🇫My respect from Baghdad
@@aaauuuplove Iraq. I wish to visit Baghdad, Samara, Basra, najaf, Babylon and fallujah one day. The land of civilization 🇮🇶. As an Afghan myself people always mistake me as an Iraq due to my looks 😂❤
history of Afghan and history of Afghanistan is two diffrant history
Afghanistan history is 350 years
but Afghan history is thosnats of years
Afghan empire 1 ghandara 2 kushan 3 aryana 4 ghorid 5 Delhi sultanat 6 sultanat of bangal 7 suri empire 8 hotaki empire 9 durrani Empire
History of Afghan start with history of Iran
@@ASWAR9622delhi sultanate and bengal sultanate was afghan
This guy is a mental patient
Bengal sultanate is a perso bangladeshi empire
delhi sultanate is a turkic empire
Ghorids are turks
Kushan are hans turk not afghans
@@aryankhan3619? Wrong
@@MuhammadThakur-si9ot how??
@@aryankhan3619 where are you from?
0:33 I think the Iron Age/Avestan period should have had states in the area of Avestan speakers divided up according to the traditions of the Avestas and Early/Pre Iranian traditions.
There were no state societies in iran or middle east
Only India had and also India's broze age 3300bce
India iron age 1200bce
Only vedic kingdoms were states
@@nothingexists5066 **cough** **cough** Babylon and Assyria and Phoenician city-states **cough cough**
@Khushal Singh Maurya Sounds like your irritated it’s the truth, look it up.
@@nothingexists5066 The Fertile Crescent (Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon) was mostly made up of large states since the IIIrd millenium BC, Anatolia (Turkey) had large scale states from 1800 BC to 1200 BC and then again from 800 BC onwards. As for Iran, Elam was a large state in what is now Fars, Luristan and Khuzestan from 2050 BC to 1100 BC and smaller states existed in those regions from 2600 BC to the Achaemenid empire, which originated in Fars.
What OP mentioned were regions that are listed in avestan scripture (thus similar to vedic Mahajannapadas), that make up most of Iran. It is probable those were countries and not states though, since no ruler is mentionned, but we know society in some regions (Bactria and Margiana for example in modern Turkmenistan and Afghanistan) cities were so big that it is highly likely they were the capital of some large state.
India had city states like the Middle East from around 3300 BC to 1700 BC in most of the Indus bassin, but we don't know if those were part of large states. After 1700 BC most of those cities disappeared, Lothal was the only major one left and disappeared around 1100 BC. Then deurbanized vedic states appeared, but those are similar to how things were organized in Iran, since the culture was similar too, its only with the growth of the Indian population and the reappartition of cities around 800 BC that they started to be large urban states.
I don't know what nationalistic bullshit they teach you but its not right.
2:36 The now muslim "Persians" really ??? Thus in the early 1000's the Ghaznavids didnt even know any Persian yet hahahahah
Yeah but what did their population speak?
@@Teapoid The population didnt conquer those regions, the Ghaznavid dynasty and army did both of whom were ethnic Turks hence Turkish speaking
1126 requires its Brahman recipient in “Maniyara” to pay the tax called turushka danda “Turk's duty”, which seems to imply that tribute was paid some 70 years before the Muslim conquest of North India
Burton-Page, J., n.d. Indian Islamic Architecture: Forms and Typologies, Sites and Monuments (Handbook of Oriental studies =. Brill Academic Publishers, p.158.
@@nenenindonu Yes but if you take the Persians out of the Ghaznavids you have a bunch of Turks with expensive clothes in a palace, not a state. He was referring to at this time specifically the Persians were truly islamified.
@@Teapoid islam is a system of beliefs not a culture
Afghanistan also known as the graveyard of empires
2:36 muslim persians ? Wtf ? Ghaznavids were Turkic not persian
Read what it says above.
@@emiriye bu videoyu savunacak kadar ahmak mısın yani
@@papazataklaattiranimam Ne, yalan mı?
@@emiriye 10 tane hata var kör olma bu kadar
@@emiriye farsların nenesini yönettiler diye fars oluyorlarsa cengizliler de türk devleti bu mantıkla
I think afghani people converted to islam from Hinduism is may be during gazanvids invasion
Another video the same mistake, no such thing as Turko-Persian Seljuks or whatever this term refers to a governments culture not an ethnicity have you heard a use like Seljuk Turko-Persians instead of Seljuk Turks ?
He called Ilkhanates persomongols too 😬
@@papazataklaattiranimam They kill the Turk
3:10 Perso-Mongol what on earth does that even mean ? 😂
Perso-Mongol Ilkhanates and Pashtun Khalji dynasty😅 what a pseudo historical expressions
@@papazataklaattiranimamAh yeah the good old Perso-Mongols my favorite history topic 😅
@Los Blancos lol, I am Pashtun and did DNA test and it says my ancestors were Hephthalites. then I checked Hephthalites and it says they were not eastern Asian people, they had European characteristics, and they were known as white huns.
@Los Blancos you have mistaken the term huns with white huns. there is historical evidence suggesting white huns not have eastern Asian origin. My friend who is Turk(Hazara) did his DNA test and it shows that he is 50% eastern Asian and the rest central, mine shows 97% central Asian, and my ancestor's y chromosome matches with malta boy in Siberia. the white Huns joined the Huns invasion, the Huns had different colors for different types of huns, the original ones who were mostly Mongolian had wore red, while the white color worn by the eastern European Huns, the white Huns were the nomads living in Russian pastoral lands. check the video on white huns and you will get more information. somebody has made a video on it too.
@Los Blancos I don't know what you just typed here, but before you say I am wrong at least do some research. Huns were eastern asian people, Turks were northeastern Asian, and Mongols were northeast Asian. the white Huns had no genetic similarity with the Huns.
the Huns were not only the confederacy of the many east Asians but also in later years many nomads living in south Europe joined them and they had no DNA or character similarity, I have blond hair, and many in my family have blue eyes.
you forgot maurya. maurya is the golden and peaceful age of afghanistan
😂😂😂
Maruya never even controlled afghanistan and afghans are barbarians
And also kushans the great.. one of the great ancient Indo-Afghan empire
Durrani empire also included Kashmir.
It doesn't
The video is great but the descriptions look like they were written by an iranian diaspora member. It is really pathetic to claim Turkic states as if they belonged to them.
Unfortunately, there is Wikipedia propaganda. For some reason, you used Persian, Pashtun or Turco-Persian expressions for Turkisc states. I suggest you remake (and impartially) the video. It's not nice to support history theft.
Plus: Perso-Mongol Ilkhanates
@@papazataklaattiranimam so what should it be?
@@velk it should be the Turk circle Jerk version.
Ahh, el famoso Wikipedia propaganda!
Maybe you should accept that it's impossible for your cCc Türkiş cCc empayırs to protect their identities without proper Turkic settlements where the dynasties rule.
아프가니스탄에도 평화가 찾아오길!
الله يعطيك العافيه تحياتي من الاردن الى افغانستان 🇯🇴❤️🇦🇫
Steve:Evolution Of Afghanistan(🇦🇫)3.200BC-1.000.000!!!
Can you tell me what music you have used?
2:36 wtf ??? Ghaznavids weren’t muslim Persians
He takes Wikipedia as source 😂
@@nenenindonu 💀
Ghaznavid themselves are muslims turk
@@papazataklaattiranimam He said that they were Turkic with heavily Persianized.
4:32 lol another mistake
Afsharids were Turkic not turco persian
Almost every Turkic dynasty on Iran eventually Persifies for obvious reasons.
@@emiriye Nader Shah even directly insulted persian people but a persoshitized empire…
@@papazataklaattiranimam That's a power move. But that doesn't mean majority of the region they rule is Turkic majority. The dynasty is Turkic, the people they rule over are Persian. This makes them Turco-Persian.
@@emiriye by this logic Mongol Empire was Turco-Mongol
@@papazataklaattiranimam You are right, Nader Shah is originally of turkic decent, he identified himself by his home province however, but no doubt that he is turkic. HE ISNT Azerbaijani though, azeri is a modern umbrella term for turks born in azerbaijan, Nader Shah is just turkic.
Lol why you forgot that Herat become part of afg with the help of UK during 1837-1856. Herat was part of Qajar dynasty
Why have captions when you can have the text that's already in the video? Like, why the captions?
edit: oh nvm i get it already
There are Korean captions, which makes sense. If this weren't a map video, the English subtitles would help for a visually-impaired audience (so a program can read them aloud), but this IS a map video, so IDK what the visually impaired would be doing here at all
If you’re Korean.
Kambojas were not Hindus Hindus indo aryan and Buddhist describe them as melchlas which is word used for non Hindu non aryan non vedic people they practice animal sacrifice which historians link to zahoristian they speak Old armo Iranian laungue Hindu indo Aryan see kambojas very badly bcz they eat meat even they their presit told their women to stay away from them
Please do the history of Yemen, my ancestral home. Looking forward to that. 😊🙏
nega horazm davrini o'tqazib ko'rsatmasdan yuborasizlar.ifloslar....Hali ko'rasizlar yana Xorazm yuksaklikka ko'tariladi.Butun osiyo va afriakni egallaydi....
Nice video! Now can you do same for Pakistan?
2:03 Wow our relations with the Afghan people go back to very old times
You forgot the Hephthalites
@@Saljuqid1040 Oh yes, Ak Hunlar👍🏻
Hey Dragon Historian, I thank you for the Uyghurs history videos, I really wish you can make the part 3, thanks for you effort :)
Ilkhanate is mongol dynasty and khalaj dynasty is turkic 😎
Of course
Ilkhanate:
Rulers => Mongol
Army => Turkic
Bureaucracy and culture => Persian
@@Saljuqid1040 bruhhh ilkhanate culture is mongolic. The Ilkhans considered nomadism to be better than urbanization, so they have no special structure, and in the end, being influenced by Islamic culture and becoming a Muslim, all the soldiers were not Turks, most of them were Mongols.
You forgot maryan ruler in Afghanistan
Pls make history of Philippines 🙏
1:04 Why does the music sound like traditional Greek music
3:06 Khaljis were Turkic Khalaj dynasty😐 that’s your fifth mistake
The Khaljis were Turko-Pashtuns, they were originally ethnically turks who were pashtunisized for hundreds of years.
Shut up i am ghilji and i have nothing to Do with turk like the turk in turkey you can See they Look the same but not me bruh steal history from other hahaha poor ppl
@@amanullah1290pashtunized 😂😂😂 really man
What pashtun have?? Hiding in the caves when somebody came
The pashtun were persianized people lol
Pashtun Khalji wtf????????
🐸
Khalji are Turko-Pashtuns.
@@amanullah1290 only Turkic
Safavids was not Persian, it was Turk, dynasty was Turk.
조선이 1882년부터 1894년까지만 청나라의 속국이였고, 나머지는 독립을 유지했다는 사실을 알려주셨으면 합니다. 중국과 세계가 조선의 1882-1894 청나라 통치 시기와 그 나머지 독립시기를 혼동해서 한국이 고려시대부터 1000년 동안 중국의 지배를 받은 괴뢰국(puppet state)이라고 알고 있더라고요. 그런 것을 설명하는 외국의 한국사 영상은 조회수 100만을 찍기도 했습니다.
From the state of many comments, this video requires a remake. I'd wager that not enough research was done into this topic beforehand. As for the contemporary portion of the video, it should be slowed down so the text boxes line up with the map changes.
The video is fine, its mostly afghan and turk nationalists arguing over things like “aaaa khaljis were turk and not pashtun” (which they are afghan)
or just complaints about other labels.
@@amanullah1290 yes an excellent video for a history thief
@@amanullah1290 It appears that Khaljis in 13th century did not identify themselves as Afghans. The poet and court historian Amir Khusrao (1253 - 1325), mentions the bloody wars of Jalaluddin Khalj against his enemies including Afghans ;
"... He (Chhajju ) must have heard how from Ghazna, Kirman (Kurram), and Barghand, I have extended my conquests as far as Darband; how I have issued orders for the shedding of the blood of my enemies, who have become like worms, when they hear the whizzing of my Kirmani blade; how, at ono time, from the heads of the Mongols, I have filled my cup with blood, and stuck their inverted skulls upon the top of my standards; how, at another time, my spears have wounded the Afghans, until the hills resounded with lamentations ; how, at another time, I made the blood flow in Janjuha, so that a boat might have glided within the hills of Jud. The Hindus themselves cannot conceive how full I have made hell. What did that ignorant thoughtless man imagine, that he dared advance his foot into my territory?' ["Miftah-ul-Fatuh" as translated by Elliot]
As the poet was particular favourite of Sultan Jalaluddin and as his works were read in his presence, Amir Khusrao would not have made this hard remark against the Afghans, if the Sultan and his courtiers identified themselves as Afghans.
Ghurid Dynasty and Khwarezmian Empire: Are you mad?!
@dkshorts3576 Bro Khwarezmians are not Seljuks.
@dkshorts3576 What??
Afghanistan belongs to Persian civilization. Persian, Turkic and Mongolian meet in Asia. For example, Kazakhstan comes from a Mongolian Empire, but Kazakh belongs to Turkic. The Mughal Empire (he originated in Afghanistan, but he lived in India and Pakistan) is named after Mongolia, but he speaks Persian.
Turkic tribes and empires were ruling over Kazakhstan long before the word Mongol or Mongolic was ever invented
@Ganda Bacha Big part of Mongol army was Turkic not even Mongolic who arrived to Kazakhstan.
@Ganda Bacha Naiman and Keraites were Turkic peoples that became Mongolized, possibly Jalair and Khongirad too according to some historians.
Well video shows Afghani people are hindu before they converted to islam
They do not "belong" to anyone, they are their own self
i would have appreciated an outline of current afghanistan so i can figure out which cities lay today inside the country and to what extent afghanistan was controlled by X politie
where is so called hazarajat or hazaristan?
What's the name of the music in 4:03?
4:02 you marked Iran there which is nice, but Iran does not speak Arabic and I just want to point this out, we speak Persian and many other languages I just ask can you please fix your mistake and I know that it is a common mistake to call Iranians Arabs but we are not
Love Afghanistan and the brave people and kind people .
🇮🇷 persia empire
Add
Mauryan empire
Gupta empire
Karkota empire to this
@@zyT175 afghanistan has ashokan pillar or rock eddict kandhar kabul and area near Tajikistan
@@zyT175 I already told you one ashok piller is near Tajikistan border with Afghanistan
And north west part of afghanistan is also controlled by greeko bactria kingdom it's also vassal state of maurya king
@@zyT175 you are not reading my comment properly brother
I said maurya ruled kabul kandhar and north afghanistan but in Western Afghanistan there was a kingdom called greeko bacteria kingdom
And maurya liberate that kingdom from selucus nicator a Greek general
And made this greeko bacteria kingdom their vassal ( it's like indirect control over them and they paid taxes to maurya king)
So 70 %afghanistan under direct control and 30 % afghanistan under indirect control
Just like today Chinese autonomous region tibet Or Xinjiang
Bro, for your kind information 👇
Panjshir resistance/northern alliance do not control any district. They are hidden in caves. Especially all districts of Panjshir include capital city was under Taliban control since Sep-2021
Even their leader Masood & Amrulah Saleh has fled Afghanistan
They are planning to destabilize pakistan which is a brilliant military strategy!
wat bedool je 😮
Kushan 1:40 🇦🇫
2:07 Hunas were already Turkic people therefore they couldn’t be Turkify.
More recently, it has been argued on the basis of Chinese sources that the Hephthalites were of Turkic origins and later adopted the Bactrian language after settling in Ṭukhāristān.
I thought it was relatively well known the Hephtalites were of Iranic origin from the now extinct Iranic peoples of Central Asia, closest related to the Tajiks.
@@Teapoid that was an old theory from 1950-60 but totally debunked by modern scholars.
@@papazataklaattiranimam yeah, I am pretty sure it is something still being argued around by modern schoolars and not just the exact same theory from the 60s.
@@Teapoid mihirakula is iranized Turkic name. And Hephthalites first Turkic people in the Afghanistan. There is a lot of evidence that the Hephthalites were Turkic.
@@Teapoid if u look at the earliest Hephtalite coins, they had clearly slanted eyes. Also the Chinese depicted the Hephtalites as beardless whereas the Persians and other Iranic people where always depicted with a beard.
My countryyyyyy❤🇦🇫🇦🇫🇦🇫
🇮🇷🇦🇫🇭🇺brother❤❤
It’s alright, but the contemporary Afghanistan portion of the video is an odd mix of de facto and de jure control
I cannot see Ghuria khel confiderataion, yusuf zai state of Pakhtunkhwa, Sadozai Sultanate Herat , khilji khanate of Kalat (Ghazni) ,Turklani state of Khushal Khan Khattak confiderataions(Independent states) between Mughul and Safavi map 🧐 . search mughal Afghan wars and Afghan safavi wars
I love My country Afghanistan
Afghanistan zindabad 🇦🇫🔥🦁🕶️🚬
Afghanistan is a battlefield.
*1978*
Communists: "I have seized control of the government!"
Mujahideen: "Allow us to introduce ourselves."
*1992*
Mujahideen: "I have seized control of the government!"
Taliban: "Allow us to introduce ourselves."
*1996*
Taliban: "I have seized control of the government!"
US Army: "Allow us to introduce ourselves."
*2021*
Taliban: "I have regained control of the government!"
NRF+IS: "Allow us to introduce ourselves."
@@ryanwidjaja4252 the resistance is dead lmao
I wonder why
Can u please do history of Australia?
Yep, history of Afghanistan is a fucking mess.
@@Respect-cp1ly with all respect, first civilization was in the region of Sumeria (Actually Iraq) where Zoroastrianism was founded.
Where do you get that source ?
@@Respect-cp1lychrestianity Logic lol 🤌😂😂
Islamic India: the role in the continual power struggles of different groups within the ranks of the Turkish invaders. Ethnically the Khaljis were Turks, but because of their earlier migration from the Turkish homelands they constituted a group quite distinct from those who had come into the Ghazni and Ghuri areas at a later time.
Pls history of pakistan
Before 1947 No Pakistan
Pakistan = Indian Muslim Land Gave by Jinnah as 2 nation theory 😊 Thatswhy Indian Muslim slums are called as Mini Pakistan 😊
안녕하세요. 작품이 너무 훌륭합니다. 한국사 한번 더 만들어줄 수 있나요? 조선은 그전까지는 독립국이었고 1882부터 1894년까지는 청나라 종속국이었다는데.. 이거 한번 읽어보시죠. 외국인들에게 한국사를 알리는, 높은 조회수를 얻을 수 있는 한국사 영상을 만들어서 한국사를 외국인들에게 다시 알리는 계기가 되었으면 합니다.
Although the Joseon dynasty considered 1392 as the foundation of the Joseon kingdom, Imperial China did not immediately acknowledge the new dynasty on the Korean peninsula. The rulers of Joseon sought to legitimize their rule through reference to Chinese symbolic authority. In 1401, the Ming court recognized Joseon as a tributary state in its tributary system. However, The Chinese tributary system was a largely symbolic Confucian world order with its basis in trade & philosophical relations between foreign states & various Chinese dynasties. Its relation to the sovereignty of some states was flexible & diverse. Larger states (e.g., Joseon Korea & Japan) enjoyed full sovereignty in both domestic & foreign affairs, & their international status cannot be considered 'dependent states'. The Qing government stated that "Joseon is both a vassal state and a independent state" when France and the U.S. asked if the war with Joseon would lead to an invasion of the Qing Dynasty, if the Qing Dynasty would intervene, and the nature of Qing-Joseon relationship. However, it was the position of Joseon, the Western world, and Japan that tributary states such as Joseon were virtually independent countries at the time. The Chinese tributary relationship was not a 'dominance-subordination' relationship, but rather a kind of 'patron-client' relationship that protected or assisted each other to prevent such a relationship. However, Qing, which began to turn its policy toward Korea substantially changed to a new imperialistic one where the suzerain state demanded certain privileges in her vassal state in the wake of Opium War, established a China-Korea Treaty of 1882 (中朝商民水陸貿易章程) with Joseon after the Imo Incident. The treaty stipulated that Joseon is a vassal state of Qing and the Chinese government began to turn its former tributary state into a semi-colony. Korea was became to a semi-colonial tributary state of China with King Gojong unable to appoint diplomats without Chinese approval, and with troops stationed in the country to protect Chinese interests. thereby the subjugative influence over Joseon by the Qing Dynasty was started. The political influence of the Qing Dynasty ended in 1894 with the First Sino-Japanese War.
weird how did not china invade afganistan
Great
мира и благополучия афганскому народу
Delete video
Нет
늘 재밌게 보고있읍니다 감사합니다
Where is mauryan empire
This is about Afghanistan, not India.
@@ChachiMogo 🖕then why even show the history before the nation of Afghanistan was formed
@@Hindustaniyoddha089 It's the history of the land that is currently named Afghanistan.
@@ChachiMogo then mauryan empire controlled half of that land for decades
@@Hindustaniyoddha089 They only controlled the southeast of the country for a little over 100yrs through a peace treaty with the Greco-Bactrians for 500 war elephants.
Please don't come here and pretend you know history when your source is Bollywood movies...LOL!
한국사 영상을 다시 만들어서 외국인들에게 재미있는 방식으로 알려주세요. 정말 죄송하지만 저는 그럴 능력이 없어서 감히 부탁드립니다. 영상 분량 짧고 재미있고 조회수 많이 올라오게ㅠㅠ
Ghazanavids and ghori Afghan empires
There turks who migrate in afg and control afg
Ghaznavid are turks
The founder has turkic names not pashtun name
THIS IS WRONG!!!! HAHAHA
아니 딱 학교 수업 종쳤는데 이걸
being a helmandi myself, it feels really proud that far back 5000 years ago people lived in the same place, woow, though i know we might not be the direct descendants of them but at least we have to have a little substance of them, which in itslef is amazing
Wayy too zoomed in.
??:아프간이 유저네요 탈레ㅂ
채널 한국어명 순우리말로 변경됬네요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
오 드디어!
درود بر تمام برادران افغانستانی
ليه بتقتلو الترك (الهزار)في بلدكم
First
Perso-mongol ilkhanate 😳 perso-turkic afsharids 😐 pashtun khalaj dynasty 😶 muslim persian ghaznavids 😑 31 IQ post 😂
Nader shah was a man of Turkish origin with Iranian nationality
Perso-mongol was bullshit Mongols just destroyed Iran
2:20 = "... And forced the Buddhist Turk shahis to convert to Sunni islam in 815." It's a non sense in the Coran the forced conversion is forbidden this a sentence is a lie 🤥 the Afghans embraced with choice and were convinced by islam.
Thank you for your efforts. Great video
So Afghanistan was created by the incoming Indo-Iranians of whom the Nuristanis are the fathers and Iranians and Indo-Aryans the two sons .
Indo-Aryans create Vedic Hindu society and Iranians create Medo-Persian Zoroastrian society. Eventually Buddist Kushan indoeuropean peoples from western china invade and spread buddism. Then The Persians invade and persianize it, the greeks hellenize it and spread greek culture, then it becomes a melting pot of zoroastrianism, buddism-greek and hinduism…before the Turks invade , and then the arab muslims come and the buddists give up but the hindus dont until the indigenous saffarid pashtuns become muslim and then all of afghanistan becomes muslim . The turks keep invading until the mongols come , and then afghanistan is stuck between the turkic-mongolic Mughal Indians, the Uzbek Bukhara and the Shia Persians, and thats when Afghan Bactrian Pakhtun Independence comes from. Ever since the Hotaks, amd Durranis and Barakzais rule afghanistan, the Soviet Union and British Empire arrive to make Afghanistan their own, they both fail and their son the USA and NATO try, and also fail to subdue the Afghan Taliban who wish to rule by sunni islam.
Who are pashtuns tho??? Nowhere in iranic or hindu history can you find the name of pashto or pashtun.
@@JessicaHooks28 We are an Iranic (Iranian) tribe. BTW, by Iranian, I don't mean from the country called Iran.
You almost got it right here. Another funny thing to know is that the Shahi kingdom centered around Kabul, both the Buddhist and Hindu ones, were actually Turkic tribe who initially adopted Buddhism when the Kushans ruled and then, through an internal coup, converted to hinduism.
@@JessicaHooks28
Its not PaSHto… the SH sound was adopted after the Persian leadership who changed the original KH sound which was hard for them and changed it to SH. So PAKHTUN becomes PASHTUN.
and the word PAKHTUN is the original name of the people . Its what the Greeks call BACTRIA.
they changed the P sound to a B.
So it was called PACTRIA but im guessing the Greeks also couldn’t say the KH sound so they changed it to CT …so PAKHTRIA becomes BACTRIA, the land of Pakhtun or Bactrians.
@@ChachiMogo if pashtuns are indigenous well then Afghanistan was vedic then Buddhist then hindu. Even nuristanis and kalashis are dardic vedic hindus. The only time where paktha was seen in rig veda was as a darada group just like nuristanis. It wasn't iranic until acheamid invasion and persianisation happened where the dardic Hindus got iranised. Pashtuns are a byproduct of both. You can't find any zoroastrian evidence in southern Afghanistan. Iranic = zoroastrianic. It's mostly vedic Hindu and Buddhist references for southern Afghanistan which is were pashtuns are located.