Yeah I don’t believe that plaintiff either. Either way why would you go to the room to speak with her? She should have pulled her to the side or an office and talked about it. Not automatically assume she was being rude about the late comment.
In the beginning of the case the plaintiff said her kids were the ones that told her the defendant was scratching her car. So technically the plaintiff never saw the defendant scratching her car and she was going by with her kids were saying while she was on the phone with the police. I don't doubt that the defendant was probably outside having a fit, and who knows maybe she did throw a few things at the lady's car. Which is also kind of strange because the plaintiff never told the judge anything about the defendant throwing things at her car she only spoke of her scratching it. But as Judge Judy often says when you come into court you have to come in with clean hands. Which means you can't do something bad and then point the finger at someone else and say they did something bad too now give me money.
Fair, and I completely agree, but in your own home? I know that if I asked someone to leave my home then I'd want them to leave immediately. However, she has converted her home into a work space as well. I feel like there's a very fine line there... I think contracts should be written up for this exact situation :p
@@k0chana6 Small business labor laws still apply regardless of where the business is operated. If she's too unprofessional to separate personal from business, then she shouldn't try to infuse a professional environment within her home, b/c that did not sound like a professional environment. They didn't arrest the young lady for a valid reason; even if she'd caught it on camera showing her trying to physically remove the young lady - just by making physical contact most judges would consider that escalating the situation and told her she should've called the police then to have her removed for trespassing, but touching her provoked a fight - whether workplace or not that could be used against her. People have to stop thinking the law no longer applies in their homes, especially when it's not an intruder and someone they initially invited in. This is why a lot of people are in prison now for what transpired in their homes.
@@jamzeeshyshy3209 the defendant is attractive but that isn't the point of the judge's comment. She's not hating on her for her looks. She's basically saying that is all she has since she is lacking smarts. That's why she's saying just stand there and br beautiful because what she is saying and her way of thinking is dumb. She is not helping her case at all, she doesn't understand that. Though in other cases I do think she may be a bit jealous of their looks. She's pretty old but looks good for her age.
Yes,she was just trying to micromanage instead of addressing the problems maturely like talk to her after the children have left. Leave her to do her to do list. I think she just did not like the defendants attitude.
sassy older lady jealous of the young beautiful girl and the young girl is immature and wanna fight everybody even the judge and she got a smart mouth. so both are goofballs. those the kind of girls that ill never date regardless how good they look. heaaaaaaaaaaaal no, drama drama
I believe the young lady scratched her car but I also think the plaintiff was more wrong. First off, don’t put your hands on an employee. EVER! Secondly, when she called 911, she conveniently left that part out about her initiating contact. Then, she expects you to be at work when she wants, but can’t even be professional enough to give you a weekly schedule. She’s an unprofessional passive aggressive employer. That’s why she works her kids for free. Who would want to work for someone like her? Ugh. I totally believe that the young lady would’ve left if she told her to. Like she said, she didn’t care at that point. Young people don’t care about getting sent home early from work. They’re like, “BYE!”
@Hades She wasn’t fired at that point. They never said that during the case. But again, I believe that if she’d asked the young lady to leave, she would’ve gladly left. You are free to insert details into the case that weren’t discussed. I’m just addressing what was disclosed.
Yeah she acted like at 14 a child can’t work but that’s not true she’s just too lazy or not properly incorporated to have a minor work for her. You can get a work permit and 14.
I agree! She was upset because she didn’t know the young lady was there and if she felt as though she was being disrespected by text why even come in the room where the young lady was when children are present? I would not let her keep my children. Then to say I told my daughter to get the kids was a lie I’m sure. She has an anger issue and thought she could Bully the girl.
Nothing was stopping the employee from walking to the room the employer was in to have that conversation. She wasn’t even working, she was just in the house.
The plaintiff is not professional at all! Regardless of the defendant's behavior it's clear the plaintiff escalated this situation. All she had to do is stop talking about what has happened, move the children to another room and let the defendant wait there for her ride.
I don’t know about this one. I think whenever there’s a younger defendant or plaintiff everyone assumes they are wrong I do think the girl scratched her car. She’s absolutely wrong for that. But I believe her story on how the fight was started. Older people (in my culture) tend to talk to people like their sub humans. I believe that lady got mad after the girl went off walked up on her to escort her out using her hands. I don’t think she asked her to leave, she was mad the girl went off and wanted to assert her dominance and got slapped. That’s it. And for judge Milian to scold her for texting, if I’m not mistaken it was the lady who texted her first with the list and asking her why she was late. She simply responded to the text.
I agree 100% with this one being a little off. I've noticed Judge Milian does this often to younger ppl, she talks down to them and tends to be snarkier and dismissive. The plaintiff didn't look like she is so calm and passive, as she claims to be, but the defendant definitely has that "I'm going to be calm to piss you off" attitude.
I agree. Also, right in the beginning when she said she was 8 minutes late but it really was 6, so she claimed a discrepancy right there. Two minutes difference??? Give me a break. I would never work for anyone who doesn't understand that sh*t happens and unless she is late regularly, for heavens sake, less than 10 minutes is totally understandable.
@@snippetsordinarylife daughter said 8. Defendant said 6. Could have been the clock they were looking at. What I found interesting is Defendant mentioned Plaintiff's camera outside and judge didn't acknowledge. She also didn't look at police report. Lastly, 1st call to 811, Plaintiff claims Defendant was walking away, but 2nd call she claimed she was still there.
Just because someone is 19 doesn’t mean they don’t deserve respect. Everyone in the court room acted like the defendant was the only one who was unprofessional….
uh....NO.....MAMME PRESS HAM... that young lady had the nastiest attitude I've ever seen between employer and employee! I'm guessing you FEEL that it is nothing wrong with giving off attitude towards your boss ,,,,supervisor.....manager.....right or wrong to add fuel to the fire her demeanor in court had.... I can do anything that I want and get away with it......attitude ...the judge aint gone find me guilty cuz im too cute... COME ON MANE.....
@@99cachorro not at all they want you to care and be in fear of losing your job like their aren’t more jobs . You want an employee to be on time be professional and make a schedule
It’s not about somebody paying you to show up 15 min early, that’s basic professionalism and respect for yourself and a good employee to show up early. On top of that she said “ ima be late “ that’s so unprofessional and a negative attitude to have. She did right by firing her. 🤷🏾♀️
@@ayannaprice157 Showing up 15 mins early 5 days a week is an extra 1.15 hours of work. Why should a boss be entitled to more than an hour of free labor every week? That’s 5 hours of free work a month! No thanks. Pay people for their time.
Depending on your state, you can physically remove someone from your property, especially if you told them to leave and they've refused to do so. The defendant said she was grabbed by her wrist and then responded by smacking the plaintiff.
@@Nevaeh1 I think the bigger problem was it also being a work location too. While it is her home, she cant mistreat employees at what is considered a work space at the time
She told on herself when, in her own words, when her boss said she could come in at 10 permanently she rolled her eyes and said “whatever!” She used the phrase “whatever! Multiple times in her own testimony
The big issue that no one is talking about: at the 4:00 mark, the plaintiff states that her 14 year old daughter who is not legally old enough to be a daycare worker, takes those children inside while the two adults talk. She cannot have sole supervision of the children within a licensed care care. That's grounds for them to lose their license.
I can understand the defendant's frustration about her schedule because in the past I have worked for employers who did the same thing, especially in retail. Not posting work schedules, job assignments, etc. Then they get upset when people don't show up or get an attitude for the inconvenience. So glad I got into nursing. I know my schedule a month in advance.
Ikr that's where I paused and came to the comments to see if someone else disagreed w/ her like i did. I make my own schedule and sometimes I'm late than I planned for. The girl was speaking facts and telling her upfront unlike she is doing with that schedule. If u don't know ur schedule more than likely it is going to be some days missed as well, especially a woman with children. There's no way of planning ahead.
@@danadyd59 And the bad action started with the owner by not giving the employee some type of schedule. Changing a schedule on a young lady w/ no car at the last min is wrong. You might as well do both u guys a favor and just say "this isn't going to work out" and get someone w/ reliable transportation. Employers try and take advantage of young people bc they are learning. Any contract is negotiable as long as it is in writing. Basically the employee was negotiating with employer after she changed schedule at last min. The employer didn't like that she had a backbone instead of just saying ok bc that isn't ok at all.
@@fintyeli3 , you obviously don't know much about how the real world works. Also, I believe the employee lived in the neighborhood. As an employer, it doesn't matter how the employee gets to work. Transportation issues are the employee's issues. If you don't like the terms of the employment, find another job. Talk to someone in the restaurant, or health care services. Schedules change frequently.
The plaintiff is something else!!! Smh 🤦🏽♀️ u can just tell!! She shouldn’t even be fighting with this young lady! Have some dignity and professionalism about yourself 💌
Plaintiff seemed extra, got that Karen vibe. Think they both have strong personalities. Think JM was too hard on the defendent. Didn't even hear her when she said gets her schedule 15 minutes before she has to be there.
@@CleveNative My dad brought me up with that kind of frame of mind- always try to be there at 15 minutes before your shift. You show you're responsible, and you're definitely there on time to relieve the person before you. Plus, things can happen that may make you late, so those 15 minutes can you help you out in those instances. But that whole 15 minute thing was really hammered in when I was active duty Navy. In some cases it was 'be there 30 minutes before', especially if it was to relieve someone who was finishing up a 12 hour watch, or something like that. That was a requirement, and definitely not a recommendation, haha. All of that to say that while it was suggested by my father, no employer ever asked me or demanded that from me. So, I agree with you there. haha
@@babiifrshj07 employers don’t ask hourly employees to arrive earlier than their start times, because they’d have to pay them for that time. Your boss can’t say, “Your shift starts at 7 so be there at 6:45 so you’re ready to start work at 7,” unless that employer is willing to pay you beginning at 6:45. The clock begins at whatever time an employee is required to be onsite, regardless of how the employer frames an official beginning of a shift.
Right, she didn’t care to listen to her because she’s young. Never said anything to the owner about her horrible behavior, especially with her daycare children being in the house. His traumatizing for them. She shouldn’t be in business sorry.
It's a good concept to get to work 15 minutes early, provided the employer is paying the employees for their time. I've worked for a shady employer who refused to pay for the extra hours they received from employees, who came in early and were expected to also stay late. Shady AF.
The concept of being 15 minutes early is to give yourself a cushion. If you're scheduled to work at 8:30, plan on being there by 8:15 that way, if life happens you're less likely to be late. Shady boss not giving pay for extra hours worked is a completely different can of worms.
What is it with all these young people thinking that they have to have to be paid for EVERY second of their time??? It's called work ethic not how much can I squeeze out of an employer. Being early, even just 5 minutes, is to give you a BUFFER. What if you leave at the same time as any other day to get there when your shift starts but guess what traffic is at a stand still because of an accident, now you're late. If you leave early and give yourself that buffer then you always get there on time, not to be paid by your employer, but to give yourself time to ease into work if you are early, and yes to start early if needed. This younger generation has no backbone or ethics at all, I'm so glad I raised my kids to be nothing like their peers, it's disgusting.
This grown lady with a home daycare should have been able to resolve the matter better than this. I feel that she was the aggressor in front of those babies 👶🏾 with a hot headed young lady. Yes the young lady is wrong but when you own a business working with children you need to not escalate conflicts while the children are in the area. This is why I don’t do home daycares.
Yes, the owner should have de-escalated the situation, fact. She was the owner/elder/ should have been wiser. Also, the young lady is 19 and not exactly a child and should have left without all the attitude. Very unnecessary.
Exactly. She was just as wrong for escalating the situation. Keep your hands to yourself...as you teach the kids. The teen was wrong for scratching the car as well but the Owner could have handled this better.
Why? Because She runs a tight ship? Because she expects a quality employee? Because she expects work to be done for the pay? Sounds to me like you're one of those unjustly entitled brats too. We can all smell your bad attitude through the screen
I think she got used to treating the defendant like a child too! Hell, she had her working with her 14 year old daughter! This job seems rinky dinky af
Neither one of them are innocent the plaintiff put her hands on her to make her leave and they started fighting! If you put your hands on someone be ready to fight!👊
Nah,that's how children and unintelligent people with no future outside of the Ghetto act. Real adults can use their words to resolve issues. Violence is for children and the hopelessly uneducated
7:02 it's kind of funny how the judge is going on about "human interaction" and that she should tell her boss in person that she might be late here and there but usually the judge would say a text paper trail is better.
She didn't say it was better to do it that way. She said it's professional to speak with your boss about work related issues in person instead of text. It's a subtle difference but a difference nonetheless
I think she was more so trying to impress upon her that with text message, the “tone” and intention are left to individual interpretation, whereas when saying something face-to-face, it’s much easier to judge exactly *how* someone intended a comment to come across. If she was going to keep working there she could have still texted the thing about being late from time-to-time, just to protect herself.
The whole idea of showing up to work 15 minutes earlier than your schedule is not necessary, this is why unions are so extremely important,, you are required to be on time not early, I wonder how many employees she has had since being in business
So if you leave home at the same time every day and get to work perfectly on time what happens when you get stuck in traffic or there's an accident? Oh teacher teacher I know, YOU'RE LATE. By leaving early you ensure that you get to work early so you're ON TIME to clock in, with the added bonus of it giving you time to get a cup of coffee, go to the bathroom and put your things away (things which should be done prior to clocking in). It's good work ethics, and no you shouldn't be paid for settling into your day at work.
I worked at a company where a few employees would clock in then proceed to go to the restroom to change into a work uniform. Then chat with people before heading to their position, causing the person they are relieving to be late leaving..just be a little early or come into work 100% ready to work.
"You can stand there and be beautiful and it doesn't matter because I know why you are..." "Thank you" Oh Lord. This is the problem today. So much self-centeredness that she doesn't hear that it was NOT a compliment.
Employer hit employee with chair. Calls 911 and never mentions she hit her with a chair. Judge doesn't care that she was hit with a chair. Court is wierd. That lady was lying they both was lying both for some reason the judge believed the older lady ....smh. what does you interigating first degree murderers have to do with anything as if your saying that murders are smarter than your average criminal. Tfoh
Yes she does. She was LATE and should have gone to say that she was there and then started working. Both have some responsibility for what happened in the house HOWEVER once she went outside and scratched the car, she was WRONG all the way about her overall behavior. She has a lot to learn and that her cuteness makes her ugly by her actions. She needs to learn how to act working on a job. Watch who you hire and learn the rules for supervising employees so that you don't have these issues. Set the standard and expect them to stick to it.
This lady is crazy 15 min early?! At no pay. I’d never expect an employee to be early, sure it’s nice, it’s preferable but it’s not standard. Employers who expect this(but don’t pay) are nerve wracking. You should schedule someone at a time that will allow them to go over the day’s responsibilities.
Almost every job I've had have asked for me to show up 10-15 minutes early to give me time to put my purse and my things in my locker and put on my apron and or put my hair up or whatever the case may be so when my shift starts I was good to go. Just saying
@@cali4life33 That’s because you need that time personally. But me I’m not getting to work any sooner than 5 minutes, if you don’t pay me, I’m not doing it. My time is valuable and you won’t steal it from me.
@@LeolaGlamour Understandable. My time is valuable too being a married mother of four but I don't mind showing up a little early because you're right personally I do need a little extra time I have a spinal disability.
when the Plaintiff received that ignorant text from the defendant about her being late all the time she should’ve known right there it was gonna be an issue but instead of letting it go until the end of the day or whatever the plaintiff decided to confront the girl right then and there in front of the children and asked her to leave and proceeded to put her hands on her and then the defendant scratched her car. If you ask me they’re both wrong. And whichever race she is doesn’t excuse the fact that she vandalized someone’s property.
@@sensual2kizz613 yes! She went to confront that young lady where she was with all the children present. If I was the parent of one of those children, I would be highly upset that she had my child in the middle of that situation. She could have handled that in a couple of different ways that would have given a better outcome. And I do think she is taking advantage of that young girl, probably paying her much less than she would have to pay a more experienced person to assist with taking care of the "house full of kids" she said she had. She has her 14 year old daughter and this young lady as her assistants in this daycare, I would bet she is not properly running that business.
The case is not about the fight, the young lady being late, or the boss' mishandling of the schedule. It's about a car being keyed/scratched. Period. For the boss to win the case does not imply that she was RIGHT in her actions. It just means that she has enough evidence to prove the girl scratched the car. Y'all are really over here getting upset at JM over the back-story leading up to the case and not taking into consideration the actual facts of the story that pertain specifically to the case. 🤦🏾♀️
Uh actually the back story does kinda affect the possibility of whether defendant did or did not damage the plaintiffs car because if we believe the plaintiff then the defendant was definitely angry enough to cause the damage but if the defendants is true then why the hell would she be angry enough to damage the plaintiffs car because she's basically getting a free day off duh. Also why the hell would she want to force the defendant out especially since she's doesn't even have a ride home yet and who knows how long it will take for the person(who I don't know could be working) who usually picks her to even get there though I can understand leaving her outside long enough for her to calm down but not for how long it will probably take for her ride to get there.
@@raynay5432 wow, you think bullying is wisdom. Typical bum b mentally amongst dummies. When you're hateful you look older if you under 30 thats even worse.
This young lady didn't handle this situation the right way but I do believe when she says the Plaintiff talks at her and got aggressive first. My daughter use to say that when working with older ppl, they tend to talk at you like you're a kid. I gave her permission to respectfully check them.
But you were young once too and you had a job did you find that to be true? Why do young people in 2022 act like they're the first people to be young or go through something. You got to learn to deal with situations. The fact that she was already late and then she's in there shooting the breeze with her daughter shows she didn't really care about her job.
@@WeezyJeffersonYo older people do talk down on and crazy to younger employees. I went through the same thing when I was young until I had enough and I checked everyone. She handled it wrong because she should have just waited until everything was calm and no one was around but what she is saying is absolutely valid
Good parents work their entire lives to avoid having their children witness situations like this. How sad that this happened at a place where they are supposed to be cared for.and protected.
I mean if this lady wants employees you have to work around their schedule too. My job thinks because they’re short that i have to come in earlier and still stay the full shift. Absolutely not i like a set schedule too especially if it’s been discussed with the supervisor before hand
Plaintiff lost me when she told us that she forces her daughter to work for free.. So she can drive a big ass GMC... Didn't care about her side after that.
She never said forces. How is that different than doing chores? Why is it bad to reach a good work ethic? Maybe she pays her? Maybe the daughter enjoys what she does? What kind of work ethic were you taught by your parents?
@@LeolaGlamour I agree. There are such things as chores, but that is whole lot different than WORKING for a parent in a business. I think she IS using her child for free labor and paying her employee pennies.
I don’t understand why the plaintiff didn’t just call the police when the defendant was so called “not leaving”. Instead she puts her hands on her and makes the situation worse they both in the wrong.
Right! Bc she didn’t ask her. She thought she was just going to push her out. Come on. You can’t do that. She didn’t even formally fire her at that point.
Plaintiff tried to get her out of the house, was assaulted then she did call the cops and the defendant lashed out and scratched up her car. Defendant is the one at fault.
The plaintiff said "No licks were passed" to the judge but then in the 911 call she said the defendant slapped her. Why did she slap you maam??? Probably because the defendant was grabbed. She may not have meant for the grab to escalate how it did, and I'm not siding with the defendant, but as an employer she went about the situation the wrong way.
did i just hear the judge say to the 19 year old that she should have calmed down the situation that the supposedly older more mature employer caused ? are u kidding ? seems like both the judge and the plaintiff were targeting the defendant simply because she is young and pretty .
@@TopherGrant nope. Just know my worth. Which is why I'm not in a crap job and don't get taken advantage of. But thanks for your concern. I appreciate it.
@@TopherGrant Maybe you work salary and yes that’s standard for salary but it’s actually illegal to expect that for an hourly position. I clock in early ten minutes it’s allowed and I get paid for it! Yes the 10 minutes helps me tremendously because I can properly be acclimated for the day but it also benefits the employer. I’m glad to have a company that understands that.
Lord have mercy. She was responding to the manager. The defendant was very clear when saying “you give me my schedule 15mins before you expect me to be at work. I may be late “ The plaintiff took advantage of the defendant bc she was young. She would’ve pulled any of that on a older woman.
literally its like the judge looked at her "JUDGED" the young girl before the case even started and already made an assumption cause of how old she is smfh
Doesn’t really matter cuz the point is she scratched her car… if you don’t like how someone is treating you then don’t work there. Don’t go and key their car and slap them. Now the focus is on her not the irrational behavior or the plaintiff
A lot of this comes down to who caused who financial damage. The plaintiff was in the wrong putting her hands on the defendant. The defendant was wrong in scratching up the vehicle. The defendant lost because she caused the most financial damage, outed herself when she said "I wasn't just sitting there scratching up the car," and the defendant had evidence with the 911 recording. If the plaintiff had hit the defendant on her head with a chair, the defendant would have probably needed medical attention for which the plaintiff would have been responsible for.
The girl smacked her boss in the face, admitted to it. Then she makes the comment that "I wasn't just outside scratching up the car." I'm sorry I fail to see how she was innocent in ANYTHING?!?! We aren't allowed to just hut people in the face for innocently trying to remove us from a situation and we damn well aren't allowed to scratch other people's vehicles because we're pissed at them and we've decided to act like a shitty little brat.
Don’t know how anyone can defend this defendant. She clearly looks entitled. The plaintiff told her to get out and she didn’t want to. She looks like someone that has a bad attitude.
If this was Judge Mathis this case would have ended differently!! I agree the defendant does have a lot of maturing to do and I think that's what got the best of her. Trying to be honest about her side of the story but instead inadvertently outed herself. I think Judge Milian picked up on that and didn't take kindly to it, hence her being so hard on the defendant. To me the plaintiff did initiate the fight and should have bared some of the responsibility in this case.
Not how that works. What you are saying is if I have an argument with my husband and he pisses me off, I have every right to go scratch his truck up. No. If you can difuse the situation thats what you do and that is what the law says you have to do. Its different if plantiff hit her and she hit the plantiff back. But no she scratched her car up. That's wrong and negates the actions before, meaning she is responsible for that crime.
Thank you!! The plaintiff committed assault when she grabbed her arm! Anything after that is self defense. Besides the truck scratching. The plaintiff is twice her age and acting like this in front of children?
Her stating she is scratching the vehicle during the call is no proof. There is no proof and she didn't sound like she admitted it judge HOPE YOU DO NOT MAKE ANOTHER DECISION BASED ON your feelings for the plaintiff and not the facts.. Her telling police she is scratching does not mean the defendant is scratching it, Judge you are being Biased again. This poor girl was guilty just by you reading the case, soi unfair.
They are in different areas of the house and if the defendant was in the garage with the children, that would make sense... you can't leave them unattended
I'm disappointed in JM both for saying texting isn't professional AND that she couldn't tell that the Plaintiff's story was (embarrassingly) drummed up, AND calling 911 for this was obviously misusing 911. She's a drama queen! JM, did you have an argument with a family member this morning?
Makes me angry when the judge decides the whole case on one word. The word just. It’s not like I was just standing around scratching her car. The judge took this in the wrong context. Every one I know has spoken just like this. It’s called sarcasm. Maybe the judge needs to understand this. Say someone accuses you of standing naked in an intersection and throwing stones while you were really standing on a corner fully clothed waiting for a bus. You comment, it’s not like I was JUST standing around naked throwing rocks. It’s a sarcastic statement meaning you had other things you were doing instead of what you were accused of doing. And the judge made it sound like she was saying I was doing other things besides scratching the car. Very poor judgment from the judge on one little 4 letter word.
i dont know about u all but if somebody other than a close friend or relative grabs my wrist or my arm and starts yanking on it then its assault , especially if its a employer ! this is a bad verdict and both the plaintiff and judge made too many assumptions about the defendant because her young age and good looks . if u listened to all that was being said then it was clear that the plaintiff first attacked the defendant and there was no proof the defendant damaged the car , nothing on video , no photos , just a recording of a phone call to the police that anybody can do just sitting on their couch and make it all up .
You have a good point here. But, the tape indicates that she was damaging the plaintiff's car. All of this was happening real time and she was reporting what she was looking at. You can even hear the child saying mom, don't go out there just wait for the police...
The plaintiff saying "VeHEcal" The day care being in a garage The plaintiff putting her hand on the defendant first It being wrong that the defendant sent text messages to the plaintiff first but the defendant getting screamed at for responding by text The plaintiff bringing the fight to the defendant in the room where the kids were (telling them to leave but still) This case 😑
I'm very surprised JM didn't question her more on that daycare she's running with her 14 year old daughter and this other young lady as her assistants. Judge Judy would have, lol!
@@odettethompson6221 Judge Mathis would have gotten in on both. Both are wrong but one is 19 and her behavior is at least somewhat excusable. I’m also appalled a mother would put out a 19 year old outside, I’m sure her neighborhood is nice but I’d never force someone to wait outside, it’s a safety issue. That girl could easily be snatched up.
@@LeolaGlamour totally agree. I put more responsibility on the plaintiff for her behavior. You might expect a 19 year old to behave the way she did in response to the plaintiff; I wouldn't expect that behavior from someone who takes care of my children.
Judge Milian is real patient. Judge Judy would have shut that "immature" young lady down the moment she kept talking while the judge was talking. Some responsibility on both sides but you catching a ride and then talking smack to an adult, grow up and learn to put a pin in if you're wrong. YOU WERE LATE TO WORK. Accept it. Now the plaintiff should have patiently let her know that they could go over her point about the schedule later. GET TO WORK right now. They act like they momma and child more than employer and employee. smh Don't hire folks that you let get too familiar enough to yell "you gone lose your license". That's serious. That young lady is going to be an issue on a job until she learns how to behave on a job and that there's rules. You can be fired for being late and then talking smack to the owner.
The defendant was wrong to vandalize her car- absolutely. But whether the plaintiff placed her hand on the girl's back or grabbed her wrist- she should have never touched the defendant! The judge should have spoke on that. & frankly, the defendant's story is more believable. The plaintiff didn't like her response, got aggressive then played victim when the defendant reacted. Keep your hands to yourself because the right person on the wrong day will rock your sh*t.
I COULD TELL BY THE WAY THE DEFENDANT CAME IN SHE HAD THAT ATTITUDE. THE PLAINTIFF HAS THE RIGHT TO TELL THE GIRL START YOUR LIST INSTEAD OF BEING IN MY DAUGHTER BDRM. I PERSONALLY WOULDN'T HAVE HIRED SUCH A YOUNG PERSON. ONCE THE PLAINTIFF SAID LEAVE THAT LIL 🤬 SHOULD'VE JUST KEPT HER MF MOUTH SHUT GATHERED HER STUFF & WAITED OUTSIDE FOR HER RIDE SIMPLE. SHE'S GOING TO MEET HER MATCH {1} DAY. GOOD CALL NOW PAY UP. OBVIOUSLY THIS JOB MEANT NOTHING TO HER JUST POCKET CHANGE FOR WEAVE / WIGS & MISC NO REAL BILLS UNBELIEVABLE
I won’t sit here and pretend that I don’t see straight through the plaintiff as well. That young lady was wrong, but BOTH are highly unprofessional.
I definitely can see through the plaintiff.
Yeah I don’t believe that plaintiff either. Either way why would you go to the room to speak with her? She should have pulled her to the side or an office and talked about it. Not automatically assume she was being rude about the late comment.
Yes!
I also believe she prolly tried to snatch the girl up since she wouldn't leave her house
In the beginning of the case the plaintiff said her kids were the ones that told her the defendant was scratching her car. So technically the plaintiff never saw the defendant scratching her car and she was going by with her kids were saying while she was on the phone with the police. I don't doubt that the defendant was probably outside having a fit, and who knows maybe she did throw a few things at the lady's car. Which is also kind of strange because the plaintiff never told the judge anything about the defendant throwing things at her car she only spoke of her scratching it. But as Judge Judy often says when you come into court you have to come in with clean hands. Which means you can't do something bad and then point the finger at someone else and say they did something bad too now give me money.
Anyone who's worked in HR or any forum of Labor law can tell you that you NEVER escalate by touching the employee; an unwanted touch is assault.
Fair, and I completely agree, but in your own home? I know that if I asked someone to leave my home then I'd want them to leave immediately. However, she has converted her home into a work space as well. I feel like there's a very fine line there... I think contracts should be written up for this exact situation :p
@@k0chana6 Small business labor laws still apply regardless of where the business is operated. If she's too unprofessional to separate personal from business, then she shouldn't try to infuse a professional environment within her home, b/c that did not sound like a professional environment. They didn't arrest the young lady for a valid reason; even if she'd caught it on camera showing her trying to physically remove the young lady - just by making physical contact most judges would consider that escalating the situation and told her she should've called the police then to have her removed for trespassing, but touching her provoked a fight - whether workplace or not that could be used against her.
People have to stop thinking the law no longer applies in their homes, especially when it's not an intruder and someone they initially invited in. This is why a lot of people are in prison now for what transpired in their homes.
True
@@dspenderella9671 Well, I definitely can't argue with your logic 🤷♀️ You're absolutely right
There’s no HR, she’s running a daycare and hired her own employee. You should never touch an employee, yes, but it’s not illegal.
Judge: you can stand there and be beautiful
Defendant: Thank you
As she should... judge Milan looks like she has a problem with people who's proud of their looks or even looks attractive like for what
Entitled brat.
@@jamzeeshyshy3209 Younger women seem to aggravate her dont they? Im like, why? We can all be beautiful together.😂💀
That doesn't surprise me at all what you expect coming from a witch and im being nice
A big mouth 🙀🧹🥴🤔 need I say more 🤨👄😭
@@jamzeeshyshy3209 the defendant is attractive but that isn't the point of the judge's comment. She's not hating on her for her looks. She's basically saying that is all she has since she is lacking smarts. That's why she's saying just stand there and br beautiful because what she is saying and her way of thinking is dumb. She is not helping her case at all, she doesn't understand that.
Though in other cases I do think she may be a bit jealous of their looks. She's pretty old but looks good for her age.
I feel like the plaintiff is just as immature as the defendant.
Agreed!
Yes !
Yes,she was just trying to micromanage instead of addressing the problems maturely like talk to her after the children have left. Leave her to do her to do list. I think she just did not like the defendants attitude.
She’s running a very unprofessional business and I would’ve pulled my child from her facility immediately
sassy older lady jealous of the young beautiful girl and the young girl is immature and wanna fight everybody even the judge and she got a smart mouth. so both are goofballs. those the kind of girls that ill never date regardless how good they look. heaaaaaaaaaaaal no, drama drama
I believe the young lady scratched her car but I also think the plaintiff was more wrong. First off, don’t put your hands on an employee. EVER! Secondly, when she called 911, she conveniently left that part out about her initiating contact. Then, she expects you to be at work when she wants, but can’t even be professional enough to give you a weekly schedule. She’s an unprofessional passive aggressive employer. That’s why she works her kids for free. Who would want to work for someone like her? Ugh. I totally believe that the young lady would’ve left if she told her to. Like she said, she didn’t care at that point. Young people don’t care about getting sent home early from work. They’re like, “BYE!”
@Hades She wasn’t fired at that point. They never said that during the case. But again, I believe that if she’d asked the young lady to leave, she would’ve gladly left. You are free to insert details into the case that weren’t discussed. I’m just addressing what was disclosed.
Yeah she acted like at 14 a child can’t work but that’s not true she’s just too lazy or not properly incorporated to have a minor work for her. You can get a work permit and 14.
What do you mean "works her kids for free"?
@Hades um no! She wasn’t fired at that point even the young lady said who wouldn’t want the day off
I agree! She was upset because she didn’t know the young lady was there and if she felt as though she was being disrespected by text why even come in the room where the young lady was when children are present? I would not let her keep my children. Then to say I told my daughter to get the kids was a lie I’m sure. She has an anger issue and thought she could
Bully the girl.
You're telling the employee she shouldn't text but yet the boss initiated the texting.
Exactly! So she should have ignored the text? Judge Milian was tripping
@April Pinketon who cares about that. The defendant is an entitled brat!
Nothing was stopping the employee from walking to the room the employer was in to have that conversation. She wasn’t even working, she was just in the house.
I was wondering why the judge only yelled at the 19 year old for that.
Her boss texted her and she responded with a text. Judge be tripping
@@franciscoguzman1065 how? How can you even tell who was lying who was the aggressor. The judge wouldn't listen to her.
The plaintiff is not professional at all! Regardless of the defendant's behavior it's clear the plaintiff escalated this situation. All she had to do is stop talking about what has happened, move the children to another room and let the defendant wait there for her ride.
Did the defendant really just stand there, and pick out the “compliment” within the tongue-lashing, and say *”Thank you”?* 😂 Girl…🤦🏽♀️
😅 Heyyyyy way to focus on the positive.
These are two fine Nubian princesses. I have the fever.
I noticed that too!! Unbelievable!
I cringed at that. 🥴🥴
Yep. Lol
You both got to put your hands on Douglas lol it's a win win 🤣
🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣 best comment ever
I was wondering what it felt like 😊
Yessss🤣😛😛🤭
He looked scared😂
I don’t know about this one. I think whenever there’s a younger defendant or plaintiff everyone assumes they are wrong I do think the girl scratched her car. She’s absolutely wrong for that. But I believe her story on how the fight was started. Older people (in my culture) tend to talk to people like their sub humans. I believe that lady got mad after the girl went off walked up on her to escort her out using her hands. I don’t think she asked her to leave, she was mad the girl went off and wanted to assert her dominance and got slapped. That’s it. And for judge Milian to scold her for texting, if I’m not mistaken it was the lady who texted her first with the list and asking her why she was late. She simply responded to the text.
She's suing the defendant for scratching her car. The defendant scratched her car. What else is there to know?
I agree 100% with this one being a little off. I've noticed Judge Milian does this often to younger ppl, she talks down to them and tends to be snarkier and dismissive. The plaintiff didn't look like she is so calm and passive, as she claims to be, but the defendant definitely has that "I'm going to be calm to piss you off" attitude.
I agree. Also, right in the beginning when she said she was 8 minutes late but it really was 6, so she claimed a discrepancy right there. Two minutes difference??? Give me a break. I would never work for anyone who doesn't understand that sh*t happens and unless she is late regularly, for heavens sake, less than 10 minutes is totally understandable.
@@snippetsordinarylife daughter said 8. Defendant said 6. Could have been the clock they were looking at. What I found interesting is Defendant mentioned Plaintiff's camera outside and judge didn't acknowledge. She also didn't look at police report. Lastly, 1st call to 811, Plaintiff claims Defendant was walking away, but 2nd call she claimed she was still there.
that part smh
Just because someone is 19 doesn’t mean they don’t deserve respect. Everyone in the court room acted like the defendant was the only one who was unprofessional….
uh....NO.....MAMME PRESS HAM...
that young lady had the nastiest attitude I've ever seen between employer and employee!
I'm guessing you FEEL that it is nothing wrong with giving off attitude towards your boss ,,,,supervisor.....manager.....right or wrong
to add fuel to the fire
her demeanor in court had.... I can do anything that I want and get away with it......attitude ...the judge aint gone find me guilty cuz im too cute...
COME ON MANE.....
Why does she deserve respect???? She hasn't earned it nor given respect toward her employer. Nope.......
Right
!
@@swtdrh1she did wow ok
@@jaynehogue2459respect is a two way street
I believe the young lady . Employer’s get mad when they can’t get under your skin .
Yes!
hahfhahha you are kidding
@@99cachorro not at all they want you to care and be in fear of losing your job like their aren’t more jobs . You want an employee to be on time be professional and make a schedule
Definitely need a schedule
So that makes you vandalize someone’s care. If she really didn’t care why didn’t she walk out?
Douglas is literally ageless
He has been called the Black Dick Clark 😂
😍😍🫠
Douglas knows it too 😭😍
I agree. His skin is so flawless and he stays in shape. Great bum too!
Killer smile 😃
Unless you are paying someone to come 15min early, it’s unprofessional to expect someone to show up early
Exactly. Why aren't more people talking about this. Disgusting on the plaintiffs half; she's a piece of work.
That part 👏🏽
She just wanted her on time. The 15 mins was good practice.. as she stated
It’s not about somebody paying you to show up 15 min early, that’s basic professionalism and respect for yourself and a good employee to show up early. On top of that she said “ ima be late “ that’s so unprofessional and a negative attitude to have. She did right by firing her. 🤷🏾♀️
@@ayannaprice157 Showing up 15 mins early 5 days a week is an extra 1.15 hours of work. Why should a boss be entitled to more than an hour of free labor every week? That’s 5 hours of free work a month! No thanks. Pay people for their time.
Also, yes you're a boss you do not put your hands on anyone.
SMH
Oh wahh
I had a boss that put her hands on me, especially during training. I loved it, of course she was a massage therapist. Ah good memories. 😆
I caught news for you JR if you tell somebody to leave your property and they don't you can lead the way.
@Hades You are exactly right.
You can fire anyone you want, but what you can't do is grab someone.
Escort them out if they not leaving is what you can do!
Depending on your state, you can physically remove someone from your property, especially if you told them to leave and they've refused to do so. The defendant said she was grabbed by her wrist and then responded by smacking the plaintiff.
So true don't touch me
@@Nevaeh1 I think the bigger problem was it also being a work location too. While it is her home, she cant mistreat employees at what is considered a work space at the time
You also can't pick other people's noses you know the saying. You can pick your friends, you can pick you nose but you can't pick your friends nose.
The defendant told on herself when she said, "I wasn't just outside scratching the car."
She sure did, and she didn’t even realize it! 😂
That’s because she’s a total sociopath……..lol 😂
She told on herself when, in her own words, when her boss said she could come in at 10 permanently she rolled her eyes and said “whatever!” She used the phrase “whatever! Multiple times in her own testimony
Lol 😆
I wasn’t just outside murdering my neighbor. So does that mean I did it?
The big issue that no one is talking about: at the 4:00 mark, the plaintiff states that her 14 year old daughter who is not legally old enough to be a daycare worker, takes those children inside while the two adults talk. She cannot have sole supervision of the children within a licensed care care. That's grounds for them to lose their license.
I can understand the defendant's frustration about her schedule because in the past I have worked for employers who did the same thing, especially in retail. Not posting work schedules, job assignments, etc. Then they get upset when people don't show up or get an attitude for the inconvenience. So glad I got into nursing. I know my schedule a month in advance.
I prefer to arrive at work with a item list to do for that day. It makes my life a lot easier!
Ikr that's where I paused and came to the comments to see if someone else disagreed w/ her like i did. I make my own schedule and sometimes I'm late than I planned for. The girl was speaking facts and telling her upfront unlike she is doing with that schedule. If u don't know ur schedule more than likely it is going to be some days missed as well, especially a woman with children. There's no way of planning ahead.
Frustration is one thing. Being combative and destructive is another issue. Bad actions lead to bad results.
@@danadyd59 And the bad action started with the owner by not giving the employee some type of schedule. Changing a schedule on a young lady w/ no car at the last min is wrong. You might as well do both u guys a favor and just say "this isn't going to work out" and get someone w/ reliable transportation. Employers try and take advantage of young people bc they are learning. Any contract is negotiable as long as it is in writing. Basically the employee was negotiating with employer after she changed schedule at last min. The employer didn't like that she had a backbone instead of just saying ok bc that isn't ok at all.
@@fintyeli3 , you obviously don't know much about how the real world works. Also, I believe the employee lived in the neighborhood. As an employer, it doesn't matter how the employee gets to work. Transportation issues are the employee's issues.
If you don't like the terms of the employment, find another job. Talk to someone in the restaurant, or health care services. Schedules change frequently.
The plaintiff is something else!!! Smh 🤦🏽♀️ u can just tell!! She shouldn’t even be fighting with this young lady! Have some dignity and professionalism about yourself 💌
Plaintiff seemed extra, got that Karen vibe. Think they both have strong personalities. Think JM was too hard on the defendent. Didn't even hear her when she said gets her schedule 15 minutes before she has to be there.
And I've been working for decades but never has a job required or requested that I be on site 15 mins before my scheduled shift!
@@CleveNative My dad brought me up with that kind of frame of mind- always try to be there at 15 minutes before your shift. You show you're responsible, and you're definitely there on time to relieve the person before you. Plus, things can happen that may make you late, so those 15 minutes can you help you out in those instances.
But that whole 15 minute thing was really hammered in when I was active duty Navy. In some cases it was 'be there 30 minutes before', especially if it was to relieve someone who was finishing up a 12 hour watch, or something like that. That was a requirement, and definitely not a recommendation, haha.
All of that to say that while it was suggested by my father, no employer ever asked me or demanded that from me. So, I agree with you there. haha
@@babiifrshj07 employers don’t ask hourly employees to arrive earlier than their start times, because they’d have to pay them for that time. Your boss can’t say, “Your shift starts at 7 so be there at 6:45 so you’re ready to start work at 7,” unless that employer is willing to pay you beginning at 6:45. The clock begins at whatever time an employee is required to be onsite, regardless of how the employer frames an official beginning of a shift.
@@mikesteele05 Yup. I wasn't even implying that's a thing in the civilian world, which is why I clarified my position at the end.
Right, she didn’t care to listen to her because she’s young. Never said anything to the owner about her horrible behavior, especially with her daycare children being in the house. His traumatizing for them. She shouldn’t be in business sorry.
It's a good concept to get to work 15 minutes early, provided the employer is paying the employees for their time. I've worked for a shady employer who refused to pay for the extra hours they received from employees, who came in early and were expected to also stay late. Shady AF.
The concept of being 15 minutes early is to give yourself a cushion. If you're scheduled to work at 8:30, plan on being there by 8:15 that way, if life happens you're less likely to be late. Shady boss not giving pay for extra hours worked is a completely different can of worms.
Yup!
Yep
How about showing up on time lol entitled af smh
What is it with all these young people thinking that they have to have to be paid for EVERY second of their time??? It's called work ethic not how much can I squeeze out of an employer. Being early, even just 5 minutes, is to give you a BUFFER. What if you leave at the same time as any other day to get there when your shift starts but guess what traffic is at a stand still because of an accident, now you're late. If you leave early and give yourself that buffer then you always get there on time, not to be paid by your employer, but to give yourself time to ease into work if you are early, and yes to start early if needed. This younger generation has no backbone or ethics at all, I'm so glad I raised my kids to be nothing like their peers, it's disgusting.
This grown lady with a home daycare should have been able to resolve the matter better than this. I feel that she was the aggressor in front of those babies 👶🏾 with a hot headed young lady. Yes the young lady is wrong but when you own a business working with children you need to not escalate conflicts while the children are in the area. This is why I don’t do home daycares.
Agree
What planet are you from? Hell nah! That lil thing wrong! She gon learn. Life is undefeated
Yes, the owner should have de-escalated the situation, fact. She was the owner/elder/ should have been wiser. Also, the young lady is 19 and not exactly a child and should have left without all the attitude. Very unnecessary.
Exactly. She was just as wrong for escalating the situation. Keep your hands to yourself...as you teach the kids. The teen was wrong for scratching the car as well but the Owner could have handled this better.
I thought the children were sent to another area?…..
Clearly she did it. Both of them was unprofessional.
But the girl is 19, she will learn. The older lady just learned it’s ok to be a bad employer.
The smirk on her face at the end tells it all.
@me you it shows the type of girl she is. She needs to grow up.
Alley
@@franciscoguzman1065 well yeah… she’s only 19.
@@Black0bsidian I have seen 19 years old that are mature than her.
@@franciscoguzman1065 You have a LOT of venom towards this girl...you're all over the comments bad mouthing her
Something about the plantiff screams "don't work for me"
She’s a horrible employer🤣💯👌🏾we all can smell it from through the screen…
Why? Because She runs a tight ship? Because she expects a quality employee? Because she expects work to be done for the pay?
Sounds to me like you're one of those unjustly entitled brats too. We can all smell your bad attitude through the screen
I think she got used to treating the defendant like a child too! Hell, she had her working with her 14 year old daughter! This job seems rinky dinky af
Yea, we can smell what she's cooking and it smells like cabbage and cat fish 😆
Yep!
Yeah. coming to work 15 minutes early mess is out the door. I clock in a 8:30 on the dot and clock out at 5:30 on the dot.
Neither one of them are innocent the plaintiff put her hands on her to make her leave and they started fighting! If you put your hands on someone be ready to fight!👊
@Tammy Harris she did to try and escort her out. That’s her home. If someone doesn’t want you there then you leave and not cop an attitude.
Nah,that's how children and unintelligent people with no future outside of the Ghetto act. Real adults can use their words to resolve issues. Violence is for children and the hopelessly uneducated
Exactly don't touch me I'll leave.
@@franciscoguzman1065 True but you can't just put your hands on anyone, she could have called the cops to get her out
@@krystingrant6292 Only she refused to leave..,
7:02 it's kind of funny how the judge is going on about "human interaction" and that she should tell her boss in person that she might be late here and there but usually the judge would say a text paper trail is better.
Yes.. she contradicts herself.. I think she wanted to come off as a know-it-all here.
She didn't say it was better to do it that way. She said it's professional to speak with your boss about work related issues in person instead of text. It's a subtle difference but a difference nonetheless
@@TopherGrant no because if she didn’t have a paper trail, the boss could deny it all they want. The power is already in their hands. Same thing.
@@MysTaria87 I agree
I think she was more so trying to impress upon her that with text message, the “tone” and intention are left to individual interpretation, whereas when saying something face-to-face, it’s much easier to judge exactly *how* someone intended a comment to come across. If she was going to keep working there she could have still texted the thing about being late from time-to-time, just to protect herself.
The whole idea of showing up to work 15 minutes earlier than your schedule is not necessary, this is why unions are so extremely important,, you are required to be on time not early, I wonder how many employees she has had since being in business
But showing up to work on time is.
So if you leave home at the same time every day and get to work perfectly on time what happens when you get stuck in traffic or there's an accident? Oh teacher teacher I know, YOU'RE LATE. By leaving early you ensure that you get to work early so you're ON TIME to clock in, with the added bonus of it giving you time to get a cup of coffee, go to the bathroom and put your things away (things which should be done prior to clocking in). It's good work ethics, and no you shouldn't be paid for settling into your day at work.
I worked at a company where a few employees would clock in then proceed to go to the restroom to change into a work uniform. Then chat with people before heading to their position, causing the person they are relieving to be late leaving..just be a little early or come into work 100% ready to work.
We had the choice to go in 15 mins earlier. If we did we got paid for it.
"You can stand there and be beautiful and it doesn't matter because I know why you are..."
"Thank you"
Oh Lord. This is the problem today. So much self-centeredness that she doesn't hear that it was NOT a compliment.
She didn’t even understand what she was saying to her.
That really cracked me up!
Shame on both of them for behaving like this in front of the children. 😑
"it's a victory for daycare providers everywhere." Oh get over yourself 🙄
Your all hurt 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I can tell this lady(the employer) is biggity. I believe the young lady, she was older & felt she deserved respect simply for being the elder.
Yes! And the majority of these commenters saying the young lady was wrong are definitely from an older generation
to me they are both bigoty.
Employer hit employee with chair. Calls 911 and never mentions she hit her with a chair. Judge doesn't care that she was hit with a chair. Court is wierd. That lady was lying they both was lying both for some reason the judge believed the older lady ....smh. what does you interigating first degree murderers have to do with anything as if your saying that murders are smarter than your average criminal. Tfoh
That girl knows she scratched that car. She even walks out with a grin on her face smh.
@Night Wolf it tells you all you need to know. She’s childish. Hopefully she grows up but people like that never change.
Idc, you don’t put your hands on people. Plaintiff was wrong too
I love that the judge called her beautiful doe..
That wasn't very pretty of that young lady to behave that way. She has much too learn.
Yes she does. She was LATE and should have gone to say that she was there and then started working. Both have some responsibility for what happened in the house HOWEVER once she went outside and scratched the car, she was WRONG all the way about her overall behavior. She has a lot to learn and that her cuteness makes her ugly by her actions. She needs to learn how to act working on a job. Watch who you hire and learn the rules for supervising employees so that you don't have these issues. Set the standard and expect them to stick to it.
she has a right to defend herself
I do wish people would learn how to behave. Dayum people! If you're going to go around life with a nasty attitude, you will reap those rewards.
This Judge definitely likes the sound of her own voice 😅😅😅
😂😂
This lady is crazy 15 min early?! At no pay. I’d never expect an employee to be early, sure it’s nice, it’s preferable but it’s not standard. Employers who expect this(but don’t pay) are nerve wracking. You should schedule someone at a time that will allow them to go over the day’s responsibilities.
Almost every job I've had have asked for me to show up 10-15 minutes early to give me time to put my purse and my things in my locker and put on my apron and or put my hair up or whatever the case may be so when my shift starts I was good to go. Just saying
@@cali4life33
That’s because you need that time personally. But me I’m not getting to work any sooner than 5 minutes, if you don’t pay me, I’m not doing it. My time is valuable and you won’t steal it from me.
@@LeolaGlamour Understandable. My time is valuable too being a married mother of four but I don't mind showing up a little early because you're right personally I do need a little extra time I have a spinal disability.
@@LeolaGlamour 🤣🤣🤣
You have my great-grandmother's name😊!!!
when the Plaintiff received that ignorant text from the defendant about her being late all the time she should’ve known right there it was gonna be an issue but instead of letting it go until the end of the day or whatever the plaintiff decided to confront the girl right then and there in front of the children and asked her to leave and proceeded to put her hands on her and then the defendant scratched her car. If you ask me they’re both wrong. And whichever race she is doesn’t excuse the fact that she vandalized someone’s property.
I agree they were both wrong and the Plaintiff was more wrong because she escalated the situation instead of diffusing it
I agree!
@@sensual2kizz613 yes! She went to confront that young lady where she was with all the children present. If I was the parent of one of those children, I would be highly upset that she had my child in the middle of that situation. She could have handled that in a couple of different ways that would have given a better outcome. And I do think she is taking advantage of that young girl, probably paying her much less than she would have to pay a more experienced person to assist with taking care of the "house full of kids" she said she had. She has her 14 year old daughter and this young lady as her assistants in this daycare, I would bet she is not properly running that business.
@@odettethompson6221 EXACTLY!!
@@odettethompson6221 that's a fact
The case is not about the fight, the young lady being late, or the boss' mishandling of the schedule. It's about a car being keyed/scratched. Period. For the boss to win the case does not imply that she was RIGHT in her actions. It just means that she has enough evidence to prove the girl scratched the car. Y'all are really over here getting upset at JM over the back-story leading up to the case and not taking into consideration the actual facts of the story that pertain specifically to the case. 🤦🏾♀️
This! Thank u
Uh actually the back story does kinda affect the possibility of whether defendant did or did not damage the plaintiffs car because if we believe the plaintiff then the defendant was definitely angry enough to cause the damage but if the defendants is true then why the hell would she be angry enough to damage the plaintiffs car because she's basically getting a free day off duh. Also why the hell would she want to force the defendant out especially since she's doesn't even have a ride home yet and who knows how long it will take for the person(who I don't know could be working) who usually picks her to even get there though I can understand leaving her outside long enough for her to calm down but not for how long it will probably take for her ride to get there.
its only the older women okay with the bullying this girl went through
@@laylor4360 as a younger woman I take this as you complimenting my wisdom beyond my years 😊😊😊😊
@@raynay5432 wow, you think bullying is wisdom. Typical bum b mentally amongst dummies. When you're hateful you look older if you under 30 thats even worse.
This young lady didn't handle this situation the right way but I do believe when she says the Plaintiff talks at her and got aggressive first. My daughter use to say that when working with older ppl, they tend to talk at you like you're a kid. I gave her permission to respectfully check them.
And if I found out that my child's employer put their hands on them, I'm going up to the job and putting my hands ON THEM!
But you were young once too and you had a job did you find that to be true? Why do young people in 2022 act like they're the first people to be young or go through something. You got to learn to deal with situations. The fact that she was already late and then she's in there shooting the breeze with her daughter shows she didn't really care about her job.
@@WeezyJeffersonYo older people do talk down on and crazy to younger employees. I went through the same thing when I was young until I had enough and I checked everyone. She handled it wrong because she should have just waited until everything was calm and no one was around but what she is saying is absolutely valid
@@WeezyJeffersonYo I agree, mommy and daddy can't always come and defend you..
@@CleveNative hello! What's good for the goose....and u know the rest
Good parents work their entire lives to avoid having their children witness situations like this. How sad that this happened at a place where they are supposed to be cared for.and protected.
She destroyed property.....
Yes, don't put your hands on anyone but what an attitude the young girl had. So common nowadays.
I mean if this lady wants employees you have to work around their schedule too. My job thinks because they’re short that i have to come in earlier and still stay the full shift. Absolutely not i like a set schedule too especially if it’s been discussed with the supervisor before hand
I agree! A lot of employers try to take advantage of their employees
She tried to pull her by the hand … that’s unacceptable unwarranted that’s initial aggression tantamount to assault.
Plaintiff lost me when she told us that she forces her daughter to work for free.. So she can drive a big ass GMC... Didn't care about her side after that.
She never said forces. How is that different than doing chores? Why is it bad to reach a good work ethic? Maybe she pays her? Maybe the daughter enjoys what she does?
What kind of work ethic were you taught by your parents?
@@TopherGrant That if I work, I should get paid.
@@LeolaGlamour I agree. There are such things as chores, but that is whole lot different than WORKING for a parent in a business. I think she IS using her child for free labor and paying her employee pennies.
She said she's her assistant... she may pay her under the table. I had relatives that owned their own businesses to do that when I was younger
@@chaycesmom1212 So illegal
I don’t understand why the plaintiff didn’t just call the police when the defendant was so called “not leaving”. Instead she puts her hands on her and makes the situation worse they both in the wrong.
Exactly
Right! Bc she didn’t ask her. She thought she was just going to push her out. Come on. You can’t do that. She didn’t even formally fire her at that point.
Plaintiff tried to get her out of the house, was assaulted then she did call the cops and the defendant lashed out and scratched up her car. Defendant is the one at fault.
Exactly. In front of children 😳 I would take my kids out that daycare immediately
The plaintiff said "No licks were passed" to the judge but then in the 911 call she said the defendant slapped her. Why did she slap you maam??? Probably because the defendant was grabbed. She may not have meant for the grab to escalate how it did, and I'm not siding with the defendant, but as an employer she went about the situation the wrong way.
did i just hear the judge say to the 19 year old that she should have calmed down the situation that the supposedly older more mature employer caused ? are u kidding ? seems like both the judge and the plaintiff were targeting the defendant simply because she is young and pretty .
THANK YOU ME TOO
@@marleonetti7 yeah I feel like the judge was biased! Kept saying respect ur elders etc but the “elder” didn’t respect her!
@@marleonetti7 You're all over the place with the same stupid comment. What does young have to do with anything? Cut the bs
I love when JM say “if not you, then WHO???” Case over at that point!!!! 😂😂😂
People shouldn’t be calling 911 for cases like this!
Ppl call 911 on black people for barbecuing, selling water, being black, etc every single day. Stop it
Bottom line when someone tell you to leave off their property.....Leave !!!!
I'm not showing up 15 minutes early for work unless I'm getting paid for those 15 minutes
💯
That's why you likely have a crap job and will always be broke.💯
@@TopherGrant nope. Just know my worth. Which is why I'm not in a crap job and don't get taken advantage of. But thanks for your concern. I appreciate it.
@@TopherGrant
Maybe you work salary and yes that’s standard for salary but it’s actually illegal to expect that for an hourly position. I clock in early ten minutes it’s allowed and I get paid for it! Yes the 10 minutes helps me tremendously because I can properly be acclimated for the day but it also benefits the employer. I’m glad to have a company that understands that.
@@mrsm2932 mkay. If you say so. Have fun flipping burgers. Lol
I would never recommend anyone to work in a daycare. Those employers are unprofessional and mean.
A victory for daycare providers everywhere 🤣
For thugs everywhere
Lord have mercy. She was responding to the manager. The defendant was very clear when saying “you give me my schedule 15mins before you expect me to be at work. I may be late “
The plaintiff took advantage of the defendant bc she was young. She would’ve pulled any of that on a older woman.
literally its like the judge looked at her "JUDGED" the young girl before the case even started and already made an assumption cause of how old she is smfh
All of that went out the window once the Defendant refused to leave then slapped that lady
Doesn’t really matter cuz the point is she scratched her car… if you don’t like how someone is treating you then don’t work there. Don’t go and key their car and slap them. Now the focus is on her not the irrational behavior or the plaintiff
15 minutes early to work? Boss sounds like a nightmare to deal with.
A lot of this comes down to who caused who financial damage. The plaintiff was in the wrong putting her hands on the defendant. The defendant was wrong in scratching up the vehicle. The defendant lost because she caused the most financial damage, outed herself when she said "I wasn't just sitting there scratching up the car," and the defendant had evidence with the 911 recording. If the plaintiff had hit the defendant on her head with a chair, the defendant would have probably needed medical attention for which the plaintiff would have been responsible for.
She should had filed assault charges against "the elder" for hitting her in the head with a chair. Did the judge think that was ok?
@Christopher Moore What ever until it's you.
If you want her there 15 minutes early then schedule her 15 minutes early.
Judge Milian, you made Douglas uncomfortable shame on you smh..
The judge was wrong, she wouldn’t even listen to her and jumped to conclusions.
The girl smacked her boss in the face, admitted to it. Then she makes the comment that "I wasn't just outside scratching up the car." I'm sorry I fail to see how she was innocent in ANYTHING?!?! We aren't allowed to just hut people in the face for innocently trying to remove us from a situation and we damn well aren't allowed to scratch other people's vehicles because we're pissed at them and we've decided to act like a shitty little brat.
@@Ash-83 She hit her after she put her hands on her. Keep your hands to yourself. LOL
Lol 😂 I'm not getting paid to be 15 minutes early
My favorite comment 😂
Don’t know how anyone can defend this defendant. She clearly looks entitled. The plaintiff told her to get out and she didn’t want to. She looks like someone that has a bad attitude.
shush, shes pretty and your mad about it. she's very reasonable only bullies think like you
@@laylor4360 😂😂😂yeah sure
This employer is ridiculous
The owner was very immature how she handled this
As was the entitled kid who wouldn’t leave and told the boss I’m gonna be late when I want
Not her taking the compliment 😂😂😂
If this was Judge Mathis this case would have ended differently!! I agree the defendant does have a lot of maturing to do and I think that's what got the best of her. Trying to be honest about her side of the story but instead inadvertently outed herself. I think Judge Milian picked up on that and didn't take kindly to it, hence her being so hard on the defendant. To me the plaintiff did initiate the fight and should have bared some of the responsibility in this case.
Not how that works. What you are saying is if I have an argument with my husband and he pisses me off, I have every right to go scratch his truck up. No. If you can difuse the situation thats what you do and that is what the law says you have to do. Its different if plantiff hit her and she hit the plantiff back. But no she scratched her car up. That's wrong and negates the actions before, meaning she is responsible for that crime.
Thank you!! The plaintiff committed assault when she grabbed her arm! Anything after that is self defense. Besides the truck scratching. The plaintiff is twice her age and acting like this in front of children?
These two grown women are both embarrassing
The amount she sued for was actually really reasonable. That could have cost over a thousand bucks to fix scratches that bad.
I'm in love with the defendant hair 😍
You expect employees to be 15 minutes EARLY every day, then pay them.
On time is on time.
Her stating she is scratching the vehicle during the call is no proof. There is no proof and she didn't sound like she admitted it judge HOPE YOU DO NOT MAKE ANOTHER DECISION BASED ON your feelings for the plaintiff and not the facts.. Her telling police she is scratching does not mean the defendant is scratching it, Judge you are being Biased again. This poor girl was guilty just by you reading the case, soi unfair.
when i was in high school, this how 85% of the kids would act. i cant believe my generation, and disrespectful we are.
THANKYOU THANKYOU THANKYOU
This is about 85 to 90% of the generation now. Still disrespectful.
If they are in the same house, why are they sending text messages instead of walking to the other room to speak to each other
Kids might be sleep. Etc
Could be many reasons.
😂😂
They are in different areas of the house and if the defendant was in the garage with the children, that would make sense... you can't leave them unattended
I feel bad for the defendant
Off topic but I couldn’t help but notice at 0:30 when the defendant walked into the court how those guys were looking at her 😂😂
Men are gross lol
I'm disappointed in JM both for saying texting isn't professional AND that she couldn't tell that the Plaintiff's story was (embarrassingly) drummed up, AND calling 911 for this was obviously misusing 911. She's a drama queen! JM, did you have an argument with a family member this morning?
I agree.
Something definitely had her in a bad mood.
Makes me angry when the judge decides the whole case on one word. The word just. It’s not like I was just standing around scratching her car. The judge took this in the wrong context. Every one I know has spoken just like this. It’s called sarcasm. Maybe the judge needs to understand this. Say someone accuses you of standing naked in an intersection and throwing stones while you were really standing on a corner fully clothed waiting for a bus. You comment, it’s not like I was JUST standing around naked throwing rocks. It’s a sarcastic statement meaning you had other things you were doing instead of what you were accused of doing. And the judge made it sound like she was saying I was doing other things besides scratching the car. Very poor judgment from the judge on one little 4 letter word.
i dont know about u all but if somebody other than a close friend or relative grabs my wrist or my arm and starts yanking on it then its assault , especially if its a employer ! this is a bad verdict and both the plaintiff and judge made too many assumptions about the defendant because her young age and good looks . if u listened to all that was being said then it was clear that the plaintiff first attacked the defendant and there was no proof the defendant damaged the car , nothing on video , no photos , just a recording of a phone call to the police that anybody can do just sitting on their couch and make it all up .
This!! It was obviously sarcastic. This is how I talk too.
You have a good point here. But, the tape indicates that she was damaging the plaintiff's car. All of this was happening real time and she was reporting what she was looking at. You can even hear the child saying mom, don't go out there just wait for the police...
This is literally how innocent ppl get thrown in jail
how is she supposed to pay it? she dont have a job😂😂
Wish judge Judy was trying this case. Would be so different and reasonable.
The plaintiff saying "VeHEcal"
The day care being in a garage
The plaintiff putting her hand on the defendant first
It being wrong that the defendant sent text messages to the plaintiff first but the defendant getting screamed at for responding by text
The plaintiff bringing the fight to the defendant in the room where the kids were (telling them to leave but still)
This case
😑
Right!!!!
ALL OF THAT!
I'm very surprised JM didn't question her more on that daycare she's running with her 14 year old daughter and this other young lady as her assistants. Judge Judy would have, lol!
@@odettethompson6221 Judge Mathis would have gotten in on both. Both are wrong but one is 19 and her behavior is at least somewhat excusable. I’m also appalled a mother would put out a 19 year old outside, I’m sure her neighborhood is nice but I’d never force someone to wait outside, it’s a safety issue. That girl could easily be snatched up.
@@LeolaGlamour totally agree. I put more responsibility on the plaintiff for her behavior. You might expect a 19 year old to behave the way she did in response to the plaintiff; I wouldn't expect that behavior from someone who takes care of my children.
Douglas is like, 'I can't believe this'
Judge Marilyn read her like a book! I'm sitting trying to figure this out. Judge already was pass that point. Great job!
Judge Milian is real patient. Judge Judy would have shut that "immature" young lady down the moment she kept talking while the judge was talking. Some responsibility on both sides but you catching a ride and then talking smack to an adult, grow up and learn to put a pin in if you're wrong. YOU WERE LATE TO WORK. Accept it. Now the plaintiff should have patiently let her know that they could go over her point about the schedule later. GET TO WORK right now. They act like they momma and child more than employer and employee. smh Don't hire folks that you let get too familiar enough to yell "you gone lose your license". That's serious. That young lady is going to be an issue on a job until she learns how to behave on a job and that there's rules. You can be fired for being late and then talking smack to the owner.
“You think you are a challenge for me?” 😂😂😂
The only thing the defendant heard was that she's beautiful...
She ate that up!! Lol
she is beautiful
She is so immature and guilty
who the hell would want to work for her, she's excited she won ...sad
Daycare owner closing statement was RIDICULOUS 🙄🤣 girl bye
Leave that weave alone girl!!!
I believe the defendant 100% scratched that car, she's got a whole Lotta attitude whew I hate teens they really think they know it all smdh
And they don’t know not even a teaspoon of anything. 🙄😒
So you believe that the GROWN woman had the right to put her hands on her?
Yes Lord! They are something else!!!
@@evp159 yep... That's the problem they need hands on them...
@@cynthiaficklin8311 Not plantiff place to do it. That ain't her child
Dayja's hair and brows are layed for the court...
The defendant was wrong to vandalize her car- absolutely. But whether the plaintiff placed her hand on the girl's back or grabbed her wrist- she should have never touched the defendant! The judge should have spoke on that. & frankly, the defendant's story is more believable. The plaintiff didn't like her response, got aggressive then played victim when the defendant reacted. Keep your hands to yourself because the right person on the wrong day will rock your sh*t.
Never put your hands on someone. But young people have no respect for adults, bosses, whatever.
She got to touch his fine self. Lol
I COULD TELL BY THE WAY THE DEFENDANT CAME IN SHE HAD THAT ATTITUDE. THE PLAINTIFF HAS THE RIGHT TO TELL THE GIRL START YOUR LIST INSTEAD OF BEING IN MY DAUGHTER BDRM. I PERSONALLY WOULDN'T HAVE HIRED SUCH A YOUNG PERSON. ONCE THE PLAINTIFF SAID LEAVE THAT LIL 🤬 SHOULD'VE JUST KEPT HER MF MOUTH SHUT GATHERED HER STUFF & WAITED OUTSIDE FOR HER RIDE SIMPLE. SHE'S GOING TO MEET HER MATCH {1} DAY. GOOD CALL NOW PAY UP. OBVIOUSLY THIS JOB MEANT NOTHING TO HER JUST POCKET CHANGE FOR WEAVE / WIGS & MISC NO REAL BILLS UNBELIEVABLE
Good afternoon jury!
😉
Good afternoon!!!!
Iol
Good Afternoon
All rise from the couch, please.
NO PROOF defendant keyed plaintiff's vehicle 😮