I completely agree with you, Thomas. I bought my Spotmatic F with the SMC Takumar 50mm f1.4 in 1975. During its life, the camera has been serviced only once. This was just before my daughter borrowed it to use during her photography courses at university. I still use the camera regularly and it works perfectly. A true classic!
Yes they are so durable, it's almost unbelievable! (But the same goes for the old Minolta SRT's or Nikkormats or maybe also some other cameras of that era ... they just never die!)
Hi Thomas, wow! Congratulations to your 10.000. 😊 Well done. Keep on with your videos. They are really a joy to watch. And according to the Pentax SP cameras, I think they are still the most beautiful cameras ever made. I usually don’t take to much attention to things like this, but in case of the Spotmatics every detail fits. The crank lever ist for example the most beautiful ever made. 😅 Cu
My first serious camera was an SP500, and I now have 3 Spotmatics 50 years later.The meters have all packed up, but that doesn't matter as they are still the best handling SLR ever built (I spent 45 years in the photo trade so have played with most). Yes, changing lenses is often a pain, but some of the Takumars rival anything ever made. My favourite - the 35/f3.5, still available at very low prices.
Great video! I currently have 5 Spotmatics, two of which were $5 each, and two of which were free. My favorites are the two SPII’s I have. At least one Spotmatics will go with me wherever I go. They are robust, work spectacularly, and are a joy to look at when not shooting. Now if only one of Ricoh Pentax’s new projects was a new version of the Spotmatic!
You seem to have found even greater deals than me! 😂 I agree with you that a new version of a Spotmatic or also a K-mount Pentax SLR would be something cool. But if they need to charge you 500+ Euro on the Pentax 17, I fear that the cost of a new analog Pentax SLR would be totally prohibitive!
A good friend of mine has one. It's a really stunning lens. He's also got the old 85mm which is also fantastic! Personally, I'm also happy with the smaller & newer 35/2, especially as it's the same 49mm filter thread as the 55/1.8.
The Spotmatic is the archetypical camera. It's the shape everyone identifies with what a camera should look like. And it's weird, because there were other cameras before and after, but this is the one that stuck in our collective mind.
Yes, it's the archetypical camera, and also it's just very beautiful, very clean lines! Not a single piece that's out of proportion or disturbing in any way!
I bought mine new in 1972 for £95 plus case and had it serviced 2 years ago for £95! It's a great camera just as good today as it ever was. Thanks for another great review!
Mine is 50 years old now, serviced once two years ago and works like new. I love the all -mechanical design - no buttons or menus! Made my own custom wooden grip which improves the balance with heavier lenses.
That's really cool. I think someone wrote in the comment section that the SP500 also offers 1/1000 second - there is an unmarked indent on the shutter dial where the 1/1000 "should be" and it really works. Does this also apply to your SP500?
@@tomscameras Yes, my SP500 does have the unmarked 1/1000 position. The shutter certainly fires. However, I don't know how close it is to 1/1000. From another channel, the SP500s may have been SP1000s that failed to meet 1/1000 tolerance, so they just put dials on them with 1/1000 missing, did not fit the self-timer and sold them as SP500s. I don't know if this is true but it seems plausible.
Great review. One tiny detail of these cameras that I think is very clever but I've never seen mentioned in any review is that if the combination of shutter speed and film speed is outside the operating range of the meter, the shutter speed index arrow on the top plate turns red to prompt you to choose a different shutter speed. Neat.
Lovely review of a legend! Even better are the photos. Your copy pf the SP ii seems to be very mint. Off topic: have you tried Miranda cameras? Fully mechanical, well built, and can take M42 lenses via adapter though they have a model that specifically has an M42 mount. The best thing about them is the interchangeable viewfinders. They are also very cheap as they are unknown or maybe "forgotten " is a better word.
Thanks for your comment! And yes, actually I was on the brink of buying a Miranda at the Doesburg photographica market just a week ago! But in the end the camera that I was interested in was not in too good a condition ... so I passed. But I'm definitely having a look at Mirandas ;)
Well my friend I bought the Nikon FG after saw your review and I have been enjoy this babe with Black & White photography.... I do have a good range of Nikkor Lenses from the 70's and they work beautiful with this camera. Thanks friend!!!!! I also have a D500, a D750 and a Z50, but i am having a trip with the FG... so many good memories when I was shooting with the FM that my grandpa' gift me in 1977, at my graduation day from high school... I am 65 now and can't wait to spend whatever more time I have shooting my cameras....
Yes there is just something special about film photography that all the digital cameras can't replicate. So nice also that you still have that Nikon FM!
That was a nice format. You covered it really really well. Justice done! Love the Takumars. Can just fondle them for hours together. I do pass through Köln about thrice a week with the RE5. I need to plan a trip there. Vielen Dank!
Thanks a lot for your feedback! And yes, Cologne is always worth a visit even though it's not a "beautiful" city :) and I'm also often using the RE5, either to Düsseldorf or to Bonn!
Great! I got a mint SPII in BLACK, with a 50mm 1,4 TAKUMAR Super-Multi-Coated. No scretches, no malfunctions! Automatic Modes not missing! Enjoy the craftmanship!
I recently replaced the light Seals in my Spotamatic SP11. I bought it in a kit with 4 Takumar lenses including the 50mm1.4 with the original metal hoods , filters extension tubes. I bought the kit mainly for the Takumar lenses. When the new Pentax 17 came out I felt I wanted a full frame film camera instead of half frame since I already owned the camera I decided to give it a try and upon inspection I found it needed new light Seals and a mirror bumper which I replaced myself with inexpensive parts from Walmart. I use my Minolta light meter with the camera as I have not been able to get mine to work I already had the light meter so no big deal
I do like the idea of the Pentax 17, but it's just a very different concept and also a different target group! But great that your Spotmatic is on the road again!
Thanks for the review, I am a long time Pentax user and have few different SLR mostly with automatic features. I am hesitated to get a Spotmatic, bcoz I have a KX which I feel the viewfinder is quite dim hard to focus with slow lens, I believe cameras of the same era are similar, an exception was the Fujica.
The KX (and KM, K1000) has exactly the same viewfinder as the Spotmatic. Well there is more information like shutter speed and aperture in the KX viewfinder, but basically they are all built on the same chassis than the Spotmatic! Only in the MX and ME models the viewfinder is completely redesigned, larger and more bright!
Love your videos, got an SP and SP F myself and a quite big Takumar lens collection (except the pricey 15mm f/3.5) - great cameras. But one request: Don't turn your noise removal (Accentize dxRevive by any chance?) to the max as this sounds just odd - keep a little background noise :)
I just asked a good friend who is the most crazy collector ever ... and no, even he doesn't have that 15/3.5 lens, only the Pentax K version ... but that one's also super rare! Thanks for your request / hint. I'm actually using Adobe Podcast and sometimes ai|coustics for voice processing!
I have the original spotmatic in black, it is beautiful, especially because of the brass which becomes to be apparent. The eye piece and exposure selector seem to be in metal on my camera. Everything still works perfectly.
I love black Spotmatics, they look fantastic! And about the metal: Maybe they did change these details during the years? On my camera, they feel warm to the touch in contrast to all the metal pieces, and a little bit "softer". That's why I think it's plastic. It's not bad, mind you!
The Pentax M42 lenses had some of the best glass ever produced. I am a Leicaflex SL shooter with a Twin-Cam Leitz Wetzlar Summicron-R 50mm f2, what I found amazing is that the SMC Takumar 55mm f1.8 is the ONLY serious competitor which can rival and match most of the best Schneider-Kreuznach, Zeiss Oberkochen and even Leitz lenses, on the market of that era. I found the Pentax Spotmatic F and Spotmatic II a bit too loud.
In your case, then the Spotmatic F would be a good solution. I don't like it that much as I don't like that concept where you always need to put on a lens cap to switch off the meter (and save the battery). But if that's okay for you, or you keep the camera in a bag all the time anyway, then it's not an issue!
All my K mount cameras are Pentax digital cameras istDL, K100D, K3-11 and K3 Mark III that's why I bought the Takumar lenses I van use them on my Pentax DSLR''S the Spotamatic SP11 was a indifferent bonus that left in a backpack for 3 years before I decided to see if anything was wrong with it besides the light meter. Yes it needed new light Seals and a mirror bumper
Picked up an SP500 few years back for about £25 came with a Takumar 50mm f2. Of note, the camera speed actually goes upto 1000th of a second by turning the dial one click off the 500 mark, it was a marketing ploy by Pentax, the SP500 was cheaper to sell. Also Takumar do an excellent 'wide angle' lens the 24 mm f3.5 prob my most used lens.
Oh yes, I've got to check out that 24mm Takumar! And thanks for mentioning that detail of the SP500. It reminds me of that car (was it a vintage Honda or Toyota) where the base version had a 4-speed gearbox, but in reality it was just a different gear lever and a piece of metal that prevented the owners to shift into 5th ...
@@tomscameras thoroughly recommend the 24mm Tom. Haha yes I remember hearing a story about that gearbox, I'm sure there's other similar stories too. Look forwwrd to seeing your views on the 24mm. Keep up the good work, thoroughly enjoy your videos, I bought the MX because of your video, and love it.
Wow, so you got one of the very last ones - in 1976 you already could get the then brand-new Pentax K cameras! Beautiful! And yes I hope I'll get a chance to review the Pentax 17. I didn't buy one for myself - I've got more than enough cameras and I never really use all the point&shoots that I've got cause I'm such an SLR guy. But the Pentax 17 definitely is a very cool camera!
Ja, ein wunderbares Stück Technik, die SP II! Ich bekam meine vor gut einer Woche, als Teil eines Konvoluts defekter Pentax Kamaras und Objektive. (+ MX, 2 x ME super) Oberflächlich sicher nicht so schön wie Deine, aber für 15€, who cares! Ihr einziges Problem war dank RUclips schnell gelöst, der Spiegel blieb ab und zu oben,l. Drei Tröpfchen Öl an die richtigen Stellen waren die Lösung. Besonders mag ich diesen schlanken Spannhebel und das Auslösegeräusch bei 1/15. Schade, dass 1/15 ja eher selten genutzt werden wird. Danke für den Tipp zu 1/1000, scheint in Ordnung zu sein. Etwas irritiert bin ich bei den Reviews von analogen Kameras immer wieder über die vielen schönen damit aufgenommenen Bilder. Hey, zwischen hinterer Linse des Objektivs und dem Film ist während der Aufnahme nur Luft! ;-) Ok, das Publikum ist es von den Digital-Reviews so gewohnt und es lockert ja auch auf. Sobald ich die Zeit habe, werde ich einen Film einlegen und die SP II auch mal in Köln ausführen...
Das hört sich doch nach einem echten Schnäppchen an, viel Spaß damit :) Was irritiert Dich denn an den schönen Bildern? Natürlich kann man mit einer analogen Kamera großartige Fotos machen, genau wie digital auch ...?
Danke! Natürlich kann man analog wunderschöne Bilder machen, aber die Qualität hat im Gegensatz zu Digitalkameras so gut wie nichts mit dem Kamera-Body zu tun, da dessen Qualität ausschließlich Einfluss auf das Scharfstellen und die Genauigkeit der Belichtung hat. Beides hängt am Ende allerdings genauso von der Sorgfalt des Fotografen ab. Wie gesagt, die Bilder lockern wunderbar solche Videos auf, sonst wären sie zu dröge und technisch. Im Gegensatz zur Qualität eines digitalen Kamera-Body ist die Aussagekraft bei einer analogen Kamera aber eher nicht vorhanden, hierbei sind Objektiv und natürlich die Wahl des Films entscheidend.
@@bodosander3346 Jetzt verstehe ich. Klar, der Body spielt analog für die Bildqualität keine große Rolle, aber die Optik schon ... n meinem Video sind das alles original zu der Spotmatic passende Pentax-Objektive. Vor allem auch das 55/1.8, was man in der Regel sowieso beim Kauf immer direkt dazu bekommt. Daher hat das ja eben doch eine gewisse Aussagekraft ;) am Ende macht es aber auch einfach Spaß, zu zeigen, daß die Qualität auch bei dieser alten Technik wirklich gut ist!
Ich wollte auch nur mal darauf hinweisen, weil es für jemanden, der nur Digital kennt, wo es im wesentlichen immer um Sensor und Datenverarbeitung geht, schwierig zu verstehen sein könnte, dass das alles im Analogen überhaupt keine Rolle spielt.
In '64 it was far ahead of time. Just compare it to some SLRs of e.g. German origin! I wouldn't want to miss my SP II! But btw: "plastic", to be honest, Spotmatic is not the only one without plastic. Look at a Ricoh Singlex II. Built in '76/'77. The only plastic there being the cover of the film advance lever😉
Most German SLR cameras of the 1960s were a disaster, I totally agree! That's why I never make a video about them so far ... I don't want to be the "hater" :-p ... thanks for pointing me towards the Ricoh cameras! Actually I sometimes have an eye to the Ricoh TLS 401 for its brick-like "Nikon F2" lookalike body design and that unique dual viewfinder!
@@tomscamerasindeed, disaster😂 no wonder why German camera industry got doomed. Re. TLS: has always been some kinda weird to me... though quite interesting , indeed. Btw, bought my Singlex II back in '77 in guess where - Cologne, with Neckermann. Cannot remember where that shop had been located. Too long ago. Still kept it through all these years...😊
Ohhh yes, I feel you! Even though I do have a strange obsession with the early digital Leica models, the M8 and the M9. But especially the M9 is a pretty risky purchase these days regarding the sensor issues. But still, they're about the only digital cameras that make me feel like I'm shooting an analog camera. I really love that.
Well I still prefer M42 lenses and mostly use pentax and yashica m42 ones. I have a Canon A1 as a high end auto film camera but the lenses of Canon are too perfect, too sharp, some photos are nearly similar to digital.. So I cannot find the retro character I seek using these newer film bodies. Btw, pentax has a good M42 wide angle, a 28mm and there is a Pallas 24mm lens, you are not without wide angle in M42. FOr M42 body I use Mamiya DSX more than spotmatic just because the sound and operation of the shutter is fuller with Mamiyas..
It's not difficult or much slower to change screw mount lenses than the bayonet type as you don't need to find and match the red dots. Just screw it in. Don't even need eyes.
That‘s true. But I am still much faster with bayonet mounts! One thing that I also noticed is that I very much prefer those soft plastic rear lens caps that you can just push over the threads, instead of screw-on rear lens caps!
I completely agree with you, Thomas. I bought my Spotmatic F with the SMC Takumar 50mm f1.4 in 1975. During its life, the camera has been serviced only once. This was just before my daughter borrowed it to use during her photography courses at university. I still use the camera regularly and it works perfectly. A true classic!
Yes they are so durable, it's almost unbelievable! (But the same goes for the old Minolta SRT's or Nikkormats or maybe also some other cameras of that era ... they just never die!)
Hi Thomas, wow! Congratulations to your 10.000. 😊 Well done. Keep on with your videos. They are really a joy to watch.
And according to the Pentax SP cameras, I think they are still the most beautiful cameras ever made. I usually don’t take to much attention to things like this, but in case of the Spotmatics every detail fits. The crank lever ist for example the most beautiful ever made. 😅
Cu
Hey, many thanks for your congratulations !! :)
My first serious camera was an SP500, and I now have 3 Spotmatics 50 years later.The meters have all packed up, but that doesn't matter as they are still the best handling SLR ever built (I spent 45 years in the photo trade so have played with most). Yes, changing lenses is often a pain, but some of the Takumars rival anything ever made. My favourite - the 35/f3.5, still available at very low prices.
Great video! I currently have 5 Spotmatics, two of which were $5 each, and two of which were free. My favorites are the two SPII’s I have. At least one Spotmatics will go with me wherever I go. They are robust, work spectacularly, and are a joy to look at when not shooting. Now if only one of Ricoh Pentax’s new projects was a new version of the Spotmatic!
You seem to have found even greater deals than me! 😂 I agree with you that a new version of a Spotmatic or also a K-mount Pentax SLR would be something cool. But if they need to charge you 500+ Euro on the Pentax 17, I fear that the cost of a new analog Pentax SLR would be totally prohibitive!
The Takumar 35mm f/2 big body (1st gen) lens is a gem. You will not be disappointed.
A good friend of mine has one. It's a really stunning lens. He's also got the old 85mm which is also fantastic!
Personally, I'm also happy with the smaller & newer 35/2, especially as it's the same 49mm filter thread as the 55/1.8.
I love my Spotmatics, and the lenses.
Beautiful photos and your videos are works of art!
Thanks Kim! :)
This is a neat camera for sure.Thanks for sharing👍
Thanks for your feedback!
The Spotmatic is the archetypical camera.
It's the shape everyone identifies with what a camera should look like.
And it's weird, because there were other cameras before and after, but this is the one that stuck in our collective mind.
Yes, it's the archetypical camera, and also it's just very beautiful, very clean lines! Not a single piece that's out of proportion or disturbing in any way!
I bought mine new in 1972 for £95 plus case and had it serviced 2 years ago for £95! It's a great camera just as good today as it ever was. Thanks for another great review!
I really love all these stories of first-owner classic cameras, like yours! Thanks for sharing!
Mine is 50 years old now, serviced once two years ago and works like new. I love the all -mechanical design - no buttons or menus! Made my own custom wooden grip which improves the balance with heavier lenses.
That sounds a bit like that wooden grip that you could buy for the Pentax LX in the 1980s!
Great review! And faboulous pictures from Catalonia and Köln! Thanks for doing this! 😊👍🏻
Thanks for your feedback! Really appreciate it!
Thanks for video. Yes, a classic camera. I currently have an SP 500.
That's really cool. I think someone wrote in the comment section that the SP500 also offers 1/1000 second - there is an unmarked indent on the shutter dial where the 1/1000 "should be" and it really works. Does this also apply to your SP500?
@@tomscameras Yes, my SP500 does have the unmarked 1/1000 position. The shutter certainly fires. However, I don't know how close it is to 1/1000. From another channel, the SP500s may have been SP1000s that failed to meet 1/1000 tolerance, so they just put dials on them with 1/1000 missing, did not fit the self-timer and sold them as SP500s. I don't know if this is true but it seems plausible.
Great video, thanks!
You’re welcome! I‘m glad you enjoyed it, thanks for the feedback!
Great review. One tiny detail of these cameras that I think is very clever but I've never seen mentioned in any review is that if the combination of shutter speed and film speed is outside the operating range of the meter, the shutter speed index arrow on the top plate turns red to prompt you to choose a different shutter speed. Neat.
Oh, many thanks for pointing out this small but clever feature! Fantastic! I didn't know about it, like apparently most other RUclips guys ... !
Are we talking about the same camera?
Not sure I follow...I got a Spotmatic F and cannot see what you mean
Still my favourite camera. I love the Pentax Spotmatic line-up. Great video!
Thanks a lot!
Lovely review of a legend! Even better are the photos. Your copy pf the SP ii seems to be very mint.
Off topic: have you tried Miranda cameras? Fully mechanical, well built, and can take M42 lenses via adapter though they have a model that specifically has an M42 mount. The best thing about them is the interchangeable viewfinders. They are also very cheap as they are unknown or maybe "forgotten " is a better word.
Thanks for your comment! And yes, actually I was on the brink of buying a Miranda at the Doesburg photographica market just a week ago! But in the end the camera that I was interested in was not in too good a condition ... so I passed. But I'm definitely having a look at Mirandas ;)
@@tomscameras Great! I turned on notifications so I don't ever miss it. I'm really enjoying your channel by the way. Greetings from Plön!
Well my friend I bought the Nikon FG after saw your review and I have been enjoy this babe with Black & White photography.... I do have a good range of Nikkor Lenses from the 70's and they work beautiful with this camera. Thanks friend!!!!! I also have a D500, a D750 and a Z50, but i am having a trip with the FG... so many good memories when I was shooting with the FM that my grandpa' gift me in 1977, at my graduation day from high school... I am 65 now and can't wait to spend whatever more time I have shooting my cameras....
Yes there is just something special about film photography that all the digital cameras can't replicate. So nice also that you still have that Nikon FM!
That was a nice format. You covered it really really well. Justice done! Love the Takumars. Can just fondle them for hours together. I do pass through Köln about thrice a week with the RE5. I need to plan a trip there. Vielen Dank!
Thanks a lot for your feedback! And yes, Cologne is always worth a visit even though it's not a "beautiful" city :) and I'm also often using the RE5, either to Düsseldorf or to Bonn!
@@tomscameras that is basically my route, Düsseldorf to Bonn and back :) May be we cross paths someday!
Great photos. Thanks !!!
I'm glad you like the shots! Many thanks for your comment!
Great! I got a mint SPII in BLACK, with a 50mm 1,4 TAKUMAR Super-Multi-Coated. No scretches, no malfunctions! Automatic Modes not missing! Enjoy the craftmanship!
Oh yes, that's a nice outfit! I love the black Spotmatic's, they look absolutely awesome!
Own them, love them.
I feel you!
I recently replaced the light Seals in my Spotamatic SP11. I bought it in a kit with 4 Takumar lenses including the 50mm1.4 with the original metal hoods , filters extension tubes. I bought the kit mainly for the Takumar lenses. When the new Pentax 17 came out I felt I wanted a full frame film camera instead of half frame since I already owned the camera I decided to give it a try and upon inspection I found it needed new light Seals and a mirror bumper which I replaced myself with inexpensive parts from Walmart. I use my Minolta light meter with the camera as I have not been able to get mine to work I already had the light meter so no big deal
I do like the idea of the Pentax 17, but it's just a very different concept and also a different target group! But great that your Spotmatic is on the road again!
Thanks for the review, I am a long time Pentax user and have few different SLR mostly with automatic features. I am hesitated to get a Spotmatic, bcoz I have a KX which I feel the viewfinder is quite dim hard to focus with slow lens, I believe cameras of the same era are similar, an exception was the Fujica.
The KX (and KM, K1000) has exactly the same viewfinder as the Spotmatic. Well there is more information like shutter speed and aperture in the KX viewfinder, but basically they are all built on the same chassis than the Spotmatic! Only in the MX and ME models the viewfinder is completely redesigned, larger and more bright!
Love your videos, got an SP and SP F myself and a quite big Takumar lens collection (except the pricey 15mm f/3.5) - great cameras. But one request: Don't turn your noise removal (Accentize dxRevive by any chance?) to the max as this sounds just odd - keep a little background noise :)
I just asked a good friend who is the most crazy collector ever ... and no, even he doesn't have that 15/3.5 lens, only the Pentax K version ... but that one's also super rare!
Thanks for your request / hint. I'm actually using Adobe Podcast and sometimes ai|coustics for voice processing!
I have the original spotmatic in black, it is beautiful, especially because of the brass which becomes to be apparent. The eye piece and exposure selector seem to be in metal on my camera. Everything still works perfectly.
I love black Spotmatics, they look fantastic! And about the metal: Maybe they did change these details during the years? On my camera, they feel warm to the touch in contrast to all the metal pieces, and a little bit "softer". That's why I think it's plastic. It's not bad, mind you!
The Pentax M42 lenses had some of the best glass ever produced.
I am a Leicaflex SL shooter with a Twin-Cam Leitz Wetzlar Summicron-R 50mm f2, what I found amazing is that the SMC Takumar 55mm f1.8 is the ONLY serious competitor which can rival and match most of the best Schneider-Kreuznach, Zeiss Oberkochen and even Leitz lenses, on the market of that era. I found the Pentax Spotmatic F and Spotmatic II a bit too loud.
I really struggle with the stoped down metering. Probably my aging eyes. Will try the f.
In your case, then the Spotmatic F would be a good solution. I don't like it that much as I don't like that concept where you always need to put on a lens cap to switch off the meter (and save the battery). But if that's okay for you, or you keep the camera in a bag all the time anyway, then it's not an issue!
Great video, thanks. Do you have a Pentax 'K' mount body?
Yes, I'm shooting two Pentax MX. I also have a video about them:
ruclips.net/video/gB7Wi2-UNXs/видео.html
All my K mount cameras are Pentax digital cameras istDL, K100D, K3-11 and K3 Mark III that's why I bought the Takumar lenses I van use them on my Pentax DSLR''S the Spotamatic SP11 was a indifferent bonus that left in a backpack for 3 years before I decided to see if anything was wrong with it besides the light meter. Yes it needed new light Seals and a mirror bumper
Picked up an SP500 few years back for about £25 came with a Takumar 50mm f2.
Of note, the camera speed actually goes upto 1000th of a second by turning the dial one click off the 500 mark, it was a marketing ploy by Pentax, the SP500 was cheaper to sell.
Also Takumar do an excellent 'wide angle' lens the 24 mm f3.5 prob my most used lens.
Oh yes, I've got to check out that 24mm Takumar! And thanks for mentioning that detail of the SP500. It reminds me of that car (was it a vintage Honda or Toyota) where the base version had a 4-speed gearbox, but in reality it was just a different gear lever and a piece of metal that prevented the owners to shift into 5th ...
@@tomscameras thoroughly recommend the 24mm Tom.
Haha yes I remember hearing a story about that gearbox, I'm sure there's other similar stories too.
Look forwwrd to seeing your views on the 24mm.
Keep up the good work, thoroughly enjoy your videos, I bought the MX because of your video, and love it.
My Honeywell Pentax Spotmatic F was bought at New York at 1976 with a SMC Takumar 50 mm F 1:1.4 ...love shuter's noise... What about Pentax 17 ?
Wow, so you got one of the very last ones - in 1976 you already could get the then brand-new Pentax K cameras! Beautiful!
And yes I hope I'll get a chance to review the Pentax 17. I didn't buy one for myself - I've got more than enough cameras and I never really use all the point&shoots that I've got cause I'm such an SLR guy. But the Pentax 17 definitely is a very cool camera!
I noticed on my SP1000 that 250-500 and 1000 all is the same speed. 1/250. Problably need a service. The slower ones seems to work fine
Yes a service would take care of this issue. It's just that the mechanics are dirty and need a thorough clean and new lubrication!
Ja, ein wunderbares Stück Technik, die SP II!
Ich bekam meine vor gut einer Woche, als Teil eines Konvoluts defekter Pentax Kamaras und Objektive. (+ MX, 2 x ME super)
Oberflächlich sicher nicht so schön wie Deine, aber für 15€, who cares!
Ihr einziges Problem war dank RUclips schnell gelöst, der Spiegel blieb ab und zu oben,l. Drei Tröpfchen Öl an die richtigen Stellen waren die Lösung.
Besonders mag ich diesen schlanken Spannhebel und das Auslösegeräusch bei 1/15. Schade, dass 1/15 ja eher selten genutzt werden wird.
Danke für den Tipp zu 1/1000, scheint in Ordnung zu sein.
Etwas irritiert bin ich bei den Reviews von analogen Kameras immer wieder über die vielen schönen damit aufgenommenen Bilder. Hey, zwischen hinterer Linse des Objektivs und dem Film ist während der Aufnahme nur Luft! ;-)
Ok, das Publikum ist es von den Digital-Reviews so gewohnt und es lockert ja auch auf.
Sobald ich die Zeit habe, werde ich einen Film einlegen und die SP II auch mal in Köln ausführen...
Das hört sich doch nach einem echten Schnäppchen an, viel Spaß damit :)
Was irritiert Dich denn an den schönen Bildern? Natürlich kann man mit einer analogen Kamera großartige Fotos machen, genau wie digital auch ...?
Danke!
Natürlich kann man analog wunderschöne Bilder machen, aber die Qualität hat im Gegensatz zu Digitalkameras so gut wie nichts mit dem Kamera-Body zu tun, da dessen Qualität ausschließlich Einfluss auf das Scharfstellen und die Genauigkeit der Belichtung hat. Beides hängt am Ende allerdings genauso von der Sorgfalt des Fotografen ab.
Wie gesagt, die Bilder lockern wunderbar solche Videos auf, sonst wären sie zu dröge und technisch. Im Gegensatz zur Qualität eines digitalen Kamera-Body ist die Aussagekraft bei einer analogen Kamera aber eher nicht vorhanden, hierbei sind Objektiv und natürlich die Wahl des Films entscheidend.
@@bodosander3346 Jetzt verstehe ich. Klar, der Body spielt analog für die Bildqualität keine große Rolle, aber die Optik schon ... n meinem Video sind das alles original zu der Spotmatic passende Pentax-Objektive. Vor allem auch das 55/1.8, was man in der Regel sowieso beim Kauf immer direkt dazu bekommt. Daher hat das ja eben doch eine gewisse Aussagekraft ;) am Ende macht es aber auch einfach Spaß, zu zeigen, daß die Qualität auch bei dieser alten Technik wirklich gut ist!
Ich wollte auch nur mal darauf hinweisen, weil es für jemanden, der nur Digital kennt, wo es im wesentlichen immer um Sensor und Datenverarbeitung geht, schwierig zu verstehen sein könnte, dass das alles im Analogen überhaupt keine Rolle spielt.
In '64 it was far ahead of time. Just compare it to some SLRs of e.g. German origin! I wouldn't want to miss my SP II! But btw: "plastic", to be honest, Spotmatic is not the only one without plastic. Look at a Ricoh Singlex II. Built in '76/'77. The only plastic there being the cover of the film advance lever😉
Most German SLR cameras of the 1960s were a disaster, I totally agree! That's why I never make a video about them so far ... I don't want to be the "hater" :-p ... thanks for pointing me towards the Ricoh cameras! Actually I sometimes have an eye to the Ricoh TLS 401 for its brick-like "Nikon F2" lookalike body design and that unique dual viewfinder!
@@tomscamerasindeed, disaster😂 no wonder why German camera industry got doomed. Re. TLS: has always been some kinda weird to me... though quite interesting , indeed. Btw, bought my Singlex II back in '77 in guess where - Cologne, with Neckermann. Cannot remember where that shop had been located. Too long ago. Still kept it through all these years...😊
I don't get the Leica hype either. Never did.
If I had a Leica, I would sell it and buy an old Pentax or a modern Fuji instead!
Ohhh yes, I feel you! Even though I do have a strange obsession with the early digital Leica models, the M8 and the M9. But especially the M9 is a pretty risky purchase these days regarding the sensor issues. But still, they're about the only digital cameras that make me feel like I'm shooting an analog camera. I really love that.
The only problem is no lock on the shutter button!
It's true, that would make it even more perfect!
Well I still prefer M42 lenses and mostly use pentax and yashica m42 ones. I have a Canon A1 as a high end auto film camera but the lenses of Canon are too perfect, too sharp, some photos are nearly similar to digital.. So I cannot find the retro character I seek using these newer film bodies. Btw, pentax has a good M42 wide angle, a 28mm and there is a Pallas 24mm lens, you are not without wide angle in M42. FOr M42 body I use Mamiya DSX more than spotmatic just because the sound and operation of the shutter is fuller with Mamiyas..
They made 1,787,960 Spotmatics and 478,379 Spotmatic IIs.
Thanks! So that would be a total of just over 2 million then! Can you tell us the source of these numbers?
It's not difficult or much slower to change screw mount lenses than the bayonet type as you don't need to find and match the red dots. Just screw it in. Don't even need eyes.
That‘s true. But I am still much faster with bayonet mounts! One thing that I also noticed is that I very much prefer those soft plastic rear lens caps that you can just push over the threads, instead of screw-on rear lens caps!
Wear the strap!
I always keep it in a camera bag when out and about - except when filming as it's all about showing the camera!