seriously your using the term camper for an RTS the British forces are set up to be a defensive fanfiction but are capable of taking the fight to the enemy if necessary.
wobbly868 you can also argue a good player who knows said forces well enough and can use then to their full potential could win also it comes down to skill really.
Marc gudiksen that would be possible. but then again the African corps excels on desert maps the russains would do terribly on those maps and vice versa for the cold of any kind.
How to curb-stomp emplacements: 1) Take 1 wehr mortar team/OKW infantry support gun 2) Move within firing range of an emplacement 3) Left-click attack position, left-click on emplacement 4) Go out and have a smoke Seriously, Brit emplacements easily fall victim to sustained indirect fire due to them being, well, immobile emplacements. While under sustained indirect fire, any Brit player worth his salt will predictably either send engineers to repair it (which will also die under the indirect fire) or brace the emplacement, rendering it unable to fire. In the latter case, you can then just rush the emplacement. Alternatively, you could always just rush them with shreck blobs (for QF 17 pounders) and armor (for everything else).
I start up company of heroes 2 and it shows that i have bought the expansion but I cant use it ingame! do i have to download the limited time trial COH 2 ?
Soviet military doctrine historically did not put emphasize on static emplacement, but rather they adapt german blitzkrieg and suited to their own capability. So they are more into mobile warfare with elastic defence tactically rather than static defense. Defensively, they would use more scorched tactic and putting no man's land than directly defending territory bordering with enemy line.
zakattack1945 if they do that. or if you delt with that just hit them with armor rush or spg fire or hit them with snipers. :P they will clear them out.
Armour Piercing Discarding Sabot Ammunition... _maybe_, and that would be under optimal conditions and with a really lax penetration criteria (ie few fragments passing the armour counting as a successful penetration)
Richardsen that`s possible. In theory. The problem is that the 17`s performance is highly overestimated. Especially in games it is. Damn, it was close to Kwk42 L70. The american penetration tests clearly show that it`s APBC shell performs simillarly to Kwk42`s Pzgr.39 (171 mm of RHa at 100 yards). The cannon did have sabot ammo, but it was rare and was poorly stabilized (you had to be the best cannonier in the world to hit a damn thing out of 300 yards).In games, however, the damn gun even outperforms the Kwk43. Sooooooooo realistic.... I don`t get it. Why the hell?!! IRL Brits had a monster 32 pounder cannon that really DID perform simillarly to Kwk43 in AT department. But that cannon is comletely forgotten.
Bademus Cat Couldn´t agree more. If they are worried about the scarcity of the 32 pounder, they could use the 3,7 inch AA as a stand-in, _a la_ Flak 88. But then again, due to how the gameply in CoH is built, towed and static anti tank guns need to be way more powerful than regular tank cannons. Remember the PaK 38 of the original CoH? It could go through the front of an M26 Pershing.
Harli Baron close enough :3......but it requires a single name of an infantry that will be a role of the vanilla panzer grenadier .....cause theres another panzer grenadier in the other faction :/
the AT gun is not so strong in RL only 130 mm pen at 500 m and 119 at 1000m , and the other ammo type had a pen of 204 mm at 500 m and 185 at 1000m !! yeah?! so this AT gun is fucked up op and stupid unreal!!! i love mods!! they will fix this shit
TEXASAX This gun is widely recognised as the best allied gun of the war and could penetrate the front plate of a tiger abd panther from long range. Go cry in the corner Wehraboo.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
for those times you want to turn WW2 into WW1
aka. stalemates
@@randomnepali7772 aka
brits are a campers dream
seriously your using the term camper for an RTS the British forces are set up to be a defensive fanfiction but are capable of taking the fight to the enemy if necessary.
wobbly868 you can also argue a good player who knows said forces well enough and can use then to their full potential could win also it comes down to skill really.
indeed
Lol commandos
Every British soldier gangsta till the Germans start spamming mortars
I've never used that bofors for An AA gun it's just bofors that made to kill infantry
World war 2 era grenade machine gun basically.
This trailers are awesome.I hope you will make trailers for the other troops.
CoH: Sim City v2
The comment that was ahead of its time
Damn legend
now the germans need the maus
For Luftwaffe nee He 331
Actually, we need the V1 from Company of Heroes I.
Anyone else notice the anti tank emplacement is much weaker than in the original game? I’ve found it’s easily destroyed by an enemy tank unguarded.
He shells the smoke shells on the shells shell.
I wonder if they are going to make a third Axis faction. African Corps? lol.
pls no more krauts, add japanese or italy instead
Hmmmm Japanese could be pretty cool, wonder what their tactics would be
Marc gudiksen that would be possible. but then again the African corps excels on desert maps the russains would do terribly on those maps and vice versa for the cold of any kind.
the africa korps can only bring in the pz 3 and possibly flak 36 relic introduced the other weapons they used already like mg 34
Thats radical
How to curb-stomp emplacements:
1) Take 1 wehr mortar team/OKW infantry support gun
2) Move within firing range of an emplacement
3) Left-click attack position, left-click on emplacement
4) Go out and have a smoke
Seriously, Brit emplacements easily fall victim to sustained indirect fire due to them being, well, immobile emplacements. While under sustained indirect fire, any Brit player worth his salt will predictably either send engineers to repair it (which will also die under the indirect fire) or brace the emplacement, rendering it unable to fire. In the latter case, you can then just rush the emplacement.
Alternatively, you could always just rush them with shreck blobs (for QF 17 pounders) and armor (for everything else).
just use artillery, the brits can move their troops and tea but not their buildings
1:10 I think they looking at me
XD
Look like brits are overpowered ^^
They kinda deserved redemption after being horribly weak in COH1
@@weksheddweller Respondes a un comentario de hace 4 años xd
Everyone's a Gangsta... Until the German Walking stuka came.
I start up company of heroes 2 and it shows that i have bought the expansion but I cant use it ingame! do i have to download the limited time trial COH 2 ?
Man that boufurs is a pain in the ass for golaith horreds.
ah good, they bring back Tales of Valor
Does anyone else notice the lag?
Yes I saw it. But I don't have to worry about it when I play it.
Where's soviet emplacements ? Or are they locked behind a dlc too ?? Like a commander?
Soviet military doctrine historically did not put emphasize on static emplacement, but rather they adapt german blitzkrieg and suited to their own capability. So they are more into mobile warfare with elastic defence tactically rather than static defense. Defensively, they would use more scorched tactic and putting no man's land than directly defending territory bordering with enemy line.
Company of Sim City 2
the AI never built any of 17 Pounder
Laughs in mortar half tracks *
Pls don't turn this into COH1's British mortar pit spam.
zakattack1945 if they do that. or if you delt with that just hit them with armor rush or spg fire or hit them with snipers. :P they will clear them out.
Vincent Celeste
Good to know.
zakattack1945 yep. it is all just closing in quickally to force the motor pits to fire close with long hang time.
Does it penetrate 230mm at 1000 m ? Are you joking, syre?!
Armour Piercing Discarding Sabot Ammunition... _maybe_, and that would be under optimal conditions and with a really lax penetration criteria (ie few fragments passing the armour counting as a successful penetration)
Richardsen that`s possible. In theory. The problem is that the 17`s performance is highly overestimated. Especially in games it is. Damn, it was close to Kwk42 L70. The american penetration tests clearly show that it`s APBC shell performs simillarly to Kwk42`s Pzgr.39 (171 mm of RHa at 100 yards). The cannon did have sabot ammo, but it was rare and was poorly stabilized (you had to be the best cannonier in the world to hit a damn thing out of 300 yards).In games, however, the damn gun even outperforms the Kwk43. Sooooooooo realistic.... I don`t get it. Why the hell?!! IRL Brits had a monster 32 pounder cannon that really DID perform simillarly to Kwk43 in AT department. But that cannon is comletely forgotten.
Bademus Cat
Couldn´t agree more. If they are worried about the scarcity of the 32 pounder, they could use the 3,7 inch AA as a stand-in, _a la_ Flak 88.
But then again, due to how the gameply in CoH is built, towed and static anti tank guns need to be way more powerful than regular tank cannons. Remember the PaK 38 of the original CoH? It could go through the front of an M26 Pershing.
17 pounder was quite a bit worse than kwk42 of the panthe (about 10mm less penetration), apds was so terribly inaccurate that was useless in combat.
i get the platinum edition for less that 10$
with the british look overpowered....theres always a faction....who hides in the shadow to beat them.....
Harli Baron close enough :3......but it requires a single name of an infantry that will be a role of the vanilla panzer grenadier
.....cause theres another panzer grenadier in the other faction :/
Harli Baron hmm.....lets see......"Landsers"?
Meaning sherman beat it or type 97 killed the sherman i still stay by my point
BLU Soldier and RED Medic i tought landsers was only in ww 1
Harli Baron no way dude :3......but well.... i dunno....japanese also fought against the soviet
german tank lover
Russians mass infantry suicide
usf medium tanks
okw elite troops
Brits campers
the only one problematic is the bofors lol
the AT gun is not so strong in RL only 130 mm pen at 500 m and 119 at 1000m , and the other ammo type had a pen of 204 mm at 500 m and 185 at 1000m !! yeah?! so this AT gun is fucked up op and stupid unreal!!! i love mods!! they will fix this shit
TEXASAX This gun is widely recognised as the best allied gun of the war and could penetrate the front plate of a tiger abd panther from long range. Go cry in the corner Wehraboo.
playing against sim city is boring
Gardening pudding boi
Cancerous faction.
Christ the amount of salty Wehraboos.
Insert generic “gUn xY cOuLd nEvEr pIeRcE tHe aRmOuR oF pAnZeR xY“ comment here
The worst of all the cancers.
more one shoot more pay 2 win
more unblalance team. more german weak unite.