Only Winning Players Can Pass This Quiz
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 июн 2024
- Can Victor (@2CardConfidence) pass my GTO quiz?
Watch me attempt his quiz here:
• The Difference Between...
10% off GTO Wizard:
gtowizard.com/p/giraffe
See more of my content on Run It Once:
www.runitonce.com/users/keuwai/
Coaching details:
www.pokergiraffe.com/
0:00 Intro
0:15 Q1
2:59 Q2
9:21 Q3
14:30 Q4
20:15 Q5 
Игры
Victor also prepared a quiz for me, check it out below!
👉ruclips.net/video/6ndqCSr-ZVw/видео.html
Good job getting me to question everything I know in that last one 🤣
Almost got you there ;)
The best poker-related video I've seen in months. Great idea building this quiz, and great "execution" too, every question was not obvious at all but still full of implications in real play.
Glad you enjoyed it :)
Both of your videos are so good. This collab is a gift from the Gods!
Loving the video as always! Please make more!
great collaboration guys!!!
The first question was so cool! Took me the entire 3-minute section before I finally understood the concept - quite sophisticated!
I really liked these questions, nice video!
Thanks for watching!
this channel feels like the amount it's understated is also the value it brings, which is to say huge
My 2 favorite RUclipsrs doing 2 videos together!! Good Friday 🥳
all nice interesting n Hi-Q quiz! I like it n it really helps a lot, Thanks for the amazing video Giraffe!
Thanks for watching!
Is this the multiverse ?
Charlie Carrel stars as Loki
It’s like a review of your previous videos😂
So I am at question 2 and already starting to see signs for which I still haven't won any tournament🤔
subbed. i have SOOOOOOOOOOOOO much to learn
Welcome aboard!
Q3! Very eye-opening
I had the AA flip over question 4 equivalent happen to my opponent in a casino when i was much younger and had almost exclusively played live. I called his raise and he didnt see i called and flipped over QQ (it was not an angle). I barreled 3 streets into him with air when a K came on the flop and he stacked me lol. Im guessing i was bleeding tells, but who knows
Hi, I recorded myself watching your videos, and answering questions, can I put this on my little blog? of course I recommended your channels.
Btw It's not a problem .
I have also a question for the last question, isn't it the case that to play such a huge overbet we have to have a lot of bluffs, and in our rank there isn't enough combo?
Sure, go ahead!
It turns out that we have more than enough bluffs, because there are way more offsuit combos than suited ones. Eg for every combo of A9cc, we have 3 combos of Ac9x.
I just hit 3 questions! not too bad as a fish! obviously need to study harder!
The 98 bet is a weird spot bc even though betting the 98 with the redraw is better for all the reasons you mentioned, it’s still doesn’t make much sense to bet bc you’re already ahead of every other type of hand except flushes, so having a redraw as low as 9 or 8 high flush is almost irrelevant bc when it improves it is still behind the majority of flushes. Sure sometimes u bet 6 and 7 high flushes, but the other flushes are more prevalent, so it’s kind of a weird one to bet there. If it was a higher board with a broadway redraw, I’d agree more often with the reasoning for betting bc of what I mentioned.
I think solver bets those with redraw more often bc it blocks hands that beat us in flushes, and cleanly gets value from two pairs and sets, not so much bc of the redraw value of the hand imo.
For sure, it’s a little bit of both - blocking more flushes gives us better equity when called too.
With the last hand, what is villains adjustment to our bets with non nut hands and bluffs?
What is our bet size with non nut hands and bluffs?
How does shoving nut flush and nut blocker hands affect the rest of our range with that strategy?
Does villain check raise bluff with any face card flush blocker knowing we don't have the nuts with a non all in bet size?
This line is cool but i'm struggling to see the strategy's build around it. If I came across this strategy in solver I would prune the all-in branch of the tree, it seems very 'algo'ish and difficult to execute accurately as a human. Cool to consider where to exploit certain villain with though. Classic line to stack a drunk fish at 4AM ready to go home from a live game sort of line. Could also use it to dominate an ultra tight scared money who would only call nuts and 2nd nuts here, start taking more 2nd nut blockers into the bluff range.
If we always shove the nut flush/nut blocker, then our smaller overbet will be much more capped. Villain should then adjust by shoving the 2nd nut flush for value, mixed in with the 2nd nut blocker at some frequency.
I doubt real opponents would do that in practice, so arguably it becomes even more important to be shoving with the nut flush. A small overbet might be fine in theory when villain is checkraising some non-nut flushes, but if they aren't doing that, then you just have to put in the money on your own :)
@@PokerGiraffe Qy my mate, what is the main bet size thats not all in with non nuts/nut blocker hands? still big bets with overbets or 75% with almost no small bets?
Probably small overbet
I don’t understand the reasoning behind the first one, can someone help out please?
Way I see it is if it goes check - check, they are less likely to have a flush draw, meaning their range by the river will be low-mid pairs and air.
Do we not unblock flush draws by NOT having spades, increasing their air by the river?
I don’t know… Open to explanations, the video didn’t clear it up for me 😂
From what I understand, some of the flush draws that have no equity and will fold to our bet arrive on the river much more rarely as they should be bet on earlier streets. So having spades actually unblocks the most prevalent group of hands in villains range which are marginal non-spade hands that we are targeting with our bluffs and are the most likely to fold
@@mr.citrus3373 I am trying to understand it, I really am, but it still doesn’t make sense to me bro
If it goes check-check, they will be more likely to have marginal “folding” hands on the river just due to the action.
So when we have spades, they do have those marginal hands that will be folding, but if we DON’T have spades, they will still have those marginal hands that will be folding the river when it goes check-check AND they will be more likely to have busted flush draws themselves. I understand that flush draws normally bet, but isn’t that irrelevant? Because we got to the river without betting ourselves (with two spades). I don’t know… I just don’t see why not having spades is not better here, you just unblock their flush draws who for some reason didn’t bet a single street in this example, but you still unblock it and make them more likely to have the draw.
I hope this isn’t confusing, but I simply can’t wrap my head around it 😂
Example: If you (in the bb) have 5s7s, that means opponent cannot have the 5s or the 7s. So then you remove combos like K7ss Q7ss, K5ss, Q5ss, etc. from his range, while on the other hand leaving all the other suited combos of K7, Q7, etc, (which will not call a river bet) still in his range.
In this particular scenario, you would of course bet all of your 57 on the river, but with a hand like Q4hh/dd/cc, GTOW checks river around 60%, whereas Q4ss is checking 0%.
Got 4/5 right !
Only missed the Q3, that was the hardest imo.
Well done :)
Why are non-spades more likely to fold? Shouldn‘t it be the other way around since if we are more likely to have spades we are more likely to bluff?
Air has to fold because it’s losing to our bluffs. The only difference is that there’s more air without spades than air with spades. Which makes us more inclined to bluff with spades.
4/5 for me. The most difficult one by far was the 98 hand on the turn imo.
Well done!
4/5 just answered check with AA and it was a very unusual spot indeed so I’ll take it😌
For sure, my first instinct was to check too :)
I got 4 out of 5 correct. That is mainly because I was your student haha
When people say all poker books are bad I laugh. They mustn't have read Janda's work.
Question 1: when we have spades, meaning the opponent has less spades, meaning he thinks that we have less spades, meaning he thinks we are bluffing with less spade draws. In essence, Spades should be completely irrelevant because no one should arrive at that checked through to the river with a spade draw? "checked to the river" meaning all streets were checked, right?
Yes, when checked to the river, both players will have less spades. Which makes you want to bluff with spades, because you unblock the hearts/diamonds/clubs that he would fold with.
@@PokerGiraffe I dont quite understand why that matters in that spot. As when we block spades, there are less missed draws in his range and more hands that will check/call meaning they have some showdown value. Lots of missed flush draws (which although dont check a lot, do sometimes especially oop) without value will be unblocked if we dont have spades - that also increases the chance of us having some showdown value, not just the missed flush (but of course, as stated earlier, in most cases flush draws would bet anyways)
@@ausv2542 I also don't understand. Love the video, but I don't think OP did a great job explaining the answer.
Why is it a good thing that our opponent has less spades on the river? It makes no sense
our opponent would have bet most of the no made hand with a flush draw, so in this check down line, his ranges of suited hands consist of many non-spades.
Holding a spade unblock those non-spade suited airball hands, increasing the chance of him folding to our bluffs.
Spot on!
@@alexpun7205 Why do we need spades tho?
In check-check lines the villain will mostly have air on the river anyway.
By us NOT having spades, we just make it a tiny bit more likely that he did have that busted flush draw (that didn’t bet for whatever reason). Which just adds another category of hands in his air on the river.
People keep saying that flush draws will bet. Okay, sure, so why didn’t we bet in this example? - we had a flush draw 😂
The point I am trying to make I guess is that it’s almost irrelevant what we have. If you bet the river in check-check lines, they will have a lot of air anyway and will be folding a lot.
I am mad at myself for not being able to understand this shit man
@@GaliReaxthink of it this way. You don’t want everything else.
If you have a diamond and a heart for example, you block suited airball hands with that diamond and heart so villains is less likely to fold. If you have a spade yes you block his suited spade but they don’t have them in the check down line.
what is MDF?
Minimum defense frequency - watch this for a crash course:
A Better Way to Think About MDF
ruclips.net/video/EUm_dgEl9TU/видео.html
Q3 is rigged. The answer is still bet both as it is not a pure check with no redraw.
The merits of betting a D are also that we block value rather than explicitly additional equity of a redraw to a 9h or 8h flush OTR.
We generate more EV betting the turn with a D as more worse hands call. Therefor the EV loss of checking is greater when holding a D.
Agreed :)
I'm a winning player and scored 1/5 lol
1/5 -> Winning player; 2/5 -> Crusher; 3/5 -> Poker god; 4/5 The God of all poker gods; 5/5 -> The Poker Giraffe
QY makes zero dollars playing online poker, just like every other poker coach.