Ok thanks. I love your videos btw. I see them on fb and you tube all the time they have really helped me understand the law in relation to divorce so thank you for posting them.
Would love to get your advice @legalqueen. Ive seen many fathers that have been falsy accused of serious domestic abuse offenses. In order for the mother to obtain either a Non Mol or full custody as you say. Although it's not the terms used now. So what can the father do in this situation? If they never get charged or the case is thrown out then what is the view of the family court. Because what I have seen is almost 100% in favour of the "victim" even though there was no proof of any incident occurring. The social construct we live in is heavily weighted almost 100% in favour of the mother Regardless of situation.
@@thelegalqueen I kind of asked the question sorry was a little all over the place. Can a non mol to stop a father seeing their son be granted based on false accusations of sexual/physical assault? How does the court view that? If no charge has been made by the police. Literally he said she said situation. Would they grant it based on probability rather than factual Evidence?
Can my husband stop me from deregistering our daughter from school? I think hes a good dad but i need to make these changes without disrupting things again once the change has been made. We are on speaking terms and i was going to wait until after the divorce to change thigs for our daughter, but he has been dragging for so long that she is struggling more and i dont want to subject her to it any more. We have joint PR as we were to have the children joint time but it has crept into them being alightly more with me. Would the courts force me to put her back into school if i am home educating her on my exs say so?
How can a father ensure 50% joint residency?
I would suggest you take some advice on this as it will be bespoke to your case as to your prospects of success
Ok thanks. I love your videos btw. I see them on fb and you tube all the time they have really helped me understand the law in relation to divorce so thank you for posting them.
Would love to get your advice @legalqueen.
Ive seen many fathers that have been falsy accused of serious domestic abuse offenses.
In order for the mother to obtain either a Non Mol or full custody as you say. Although it's not the terms used now.
So what can the father do in this situation? If they never get charged or the case is thrown out then what is the view of the family court. Because what I have seen is almost 100% in favour of the "victim" even though there was no proof of any incident occurring.
The social construct we live in is heavily weighted almost 100% in favour of the mother Regardless of situation.
did you have a specific question - happy to help
@@thelegalqueen I kind of asked the question sorry was a little all over the place.
Can a non mol to stop a father seeing their son be granted based on false accusations of sexual/physical assault? How does the court view that? If no charge has been made by the police. Literally he said she said situation. Would they grant it based on probability rather than factual Evidence?
Can my husband stop me from deregistering our daughter from school? I think hes a good dad but i need to make these changes without disrupting things again once the change has been made. We are on speaking terms and i was going to wait until after the divorce to change thigs for our daughter, but he has been dragging for so long that she is struggling more and i dont want to subject her to it any more. We have joint PR as we were to have the children joint time but it has crept into them being alightly more with me. Would the courts force me to put her back into school if i am home educating her on my exs say so?
But ‘custody’ is a very outdated concept. The term is now Child ‘Arrangements’ and it is all in the best interests of the child.
It’s really not! There’s plenty of horror stories out there that show it’s not always the child’s best interests in these arrangements.
@@rm8519 I meant that child arrangements are judged on the premise of the best interests of the child (as opposed the parent).
you are absolutely right, but so many people still refer to custody so it makes understanding a little easier