Himmler was plagued by stomach issues (likely psychological in origin) while in office. A fascinating story-documentary is of his Doctor, who would go into the heart of the gestapo and ss building to do "manual manipulations" of his stomach. The doctor would give him lists of people to release from conc camps and, amazingly, Himmler complied. Great documentary.
fdllicks it was a very interesting documentary but if I may ask why do you believe it was psychological in origin? I’ve always had the understanding that many Germans suffered from the illness due to diet
@@johnschultz8464 I have no evidence. But Himmler did suffer from these stomach problems after his SS started their "liquidation programs" in the Ukraine and later. I remember reading a book where he wrote a letter to his wife about how "future generations of the Reich will not know the burden we carried"or something to that effect that showed real guilt on his mind. I also believe Hitlers shaking left arm was psychological. Again, no evidence,but very plausible. Mysterious Abdo pain is common in people with psychological problems. "conversion disorder" is the proper name.
@@fdllicks Hitler himself also had severe stomach problems. Cramping, pain, and apparently, a tremendous problem with flatulence. Being that he was a vegetarian and Himmler wasn't, we probably could rule out diet. I think that for both men, it was related to some emotional issue, but I highly doubt it was guilt, as the other commenter suggests.
There's a gland in the middle of the brain called the pineal gland it helps to regulate sleep empathy and many other personality functions and can become calcified due to being deprived of the sun
Incredibly interesting. My only complaint is the repetitive mispronunciation of Nazi Labor Front Leader, Robert Ley. A common American mistake, based on common pronunciations of Irish surnames such as “Fey.” In German, his surname was pronounced “Lei” with the hard “I.”
Evil is the only hierarchy I know of that always puts its best on top and lines everybody else where they should be on that scale of efficiency. That’s the scariest part. When he said:“Psychiatry has problems diagnosing cultures” about ISIS animals I learned everything I needed to know about this professor. 44:50
Psychiatry has a hard time diagnosing any cult or religious group no matter who they are if only because psychiatry operates at the level of individuals not collectives. I don’t think he means to dignify their practices so much as he’s stressing a limitation of psychiatry. Culture can be malevolent or sadistic and certainly murderous so it’s not actually incorrect to say IS has a culture even if it sounds horrifying to us, it’s jarring for sure and it sounds euphemistic to me too but it’s not wrong and it’s hardly some endorsement.
All “educated” women look at male dominated cultures as pure evil. The smartest and most effective leaders should be on top and everyone knows it, including Maria the fellow traveler liyubman, she just doesn’t like males because she’s jealous of them. It’s why post modern history courses vilify effective leaders, European and American ones in particular, because women, and Marxist men, are hopeful if they they re-educate into believing that up is down, squares are round and women can be efficient and not emotional in positions of authority of society’s. If they succeed then the world will suffer more than it ever has before.
The older I get the more I find culture interesting and manipulative in some ways. It can definitely affect the individual phsyche. I think it can be very beautiful, but also dangerous. It all depends on what is valuable and meaningful to the culture and who is in charge. Far too often it is money, profit, power, and influence that drives culture today, esp. in the west. Just watch TV or RUclips and look at the ads.
It is mystifying how the greater percentage of Germans and Austrians in the last century could devote such loyalty to the Nazi cause as if the whole country went a bit dotty.
Didn’t Plato explain this phenomenon?! Human race is very influenced by each other , is our nature the marketing people used this from years and that is how they make ir break a product or ideas. We only can protect ourselves knowing history and learning from the facts.
One has to also study the ancestorial history and the different traumas Europeans went through way back when they left Africa and mixed with Neanderthals and denovisions earlier then lived in a hierarchical society that partly because of isolation and inbreeding developed many personality disorders and this is what the intellencia refuse to a
It is Freudian mumbo jumbo. Which coincidentally reminds me that the blots looked like two elephants dancing to me. That might mean these guys would call me a psychopath too.
@@jean6872 There is a lot more to it than what someone says they see. It's a whole context; the words they use, body language, how they interact with the interviewer, etc.
@@jean6872 Paying attention to the particular words someone uses, the signals coming from the positioning of their body, and the way in which a person interacts with an interviewer, that's all "mumbo jumbo?" I have to disagree. Words carry our intents and our feelings, even when we don't want them to. Using one particular word when a different one would work, but has a slightly different message behind it, can tell a trained professional a whole lot about someone. If a person sits in front of an interviewer with their arms firmly held across their chest, that is a definite sign of defensiveness. If they bounce their leg up and down rapidly, it shows lack of patience, anxiety, or even irritation. It also indicates a desire to leave the place they are in. All of those are a form of communication. You interact with people every day. You can tell, feel it, when someone is being dismissive of you, if they respect you or not, if they're distracted, etc. Even during a test like the Rorschach, the test subject is communicating with the test giver in all of those ways, and more. The subconscious communications through the things I listed might even give more information to the interviewer than the ink blots themselves. We can all "betray" ourselves to others through all those means on a daily basis, whether we want to or not.
Paying attention to the particular words someone uses, the signals coming from the positioning of their body, and the way in which a person interacts with an interviewer, that's all "mumbo jumbo?" I have to disagree. Words carry our intents and our feelings, even when we don't want them to. Using one particular word when a different one would work, but has a slightly different message behind it, can tell a trained professional a whole lot about someone. If a person sits in front of an interviewer with their arms firmly held across their chest, that is a definite sign of defensiveness. If they bounce their leg up and down rapidly, it shows lack of patience, anxiety, or even irritation. It also indicates a desire to leave the place they are in. All of those are a form of communication. You interact with people every day. You can tell, feel it, when someone is being dismissive of you, if they respect you or not, if they're distracted, etc. Even during a test like the Rorschach, the test subject is communicating with the test giver in all of those ways, and more. The subconscious communications through the things I listed might even give more information to the interviewer than the ink blots themselves. We can all "betray" ourselves to others through all those means on a daily basis, whether we want to or not.
Himmler was plagued by stomach issues (likely psychological in origin) while in office. A fascinating story-documentary is of his Doctor, who would go into the heart of the gestapo and ss building to do "manual manipulations" of his stomach. The doctor would give him lists of people to release from conc camps and, amazingly, Himmler complied. Great documentary.
fdllicks it was a very interesting documentary but if I may ask why do you believe it was psychological in origin? I’ve always had the understanding that many Germans suffered from the illness due to diet
@@johnschultz8464 I have no evidence. But Himmler did suffer from these stomach problems after his SS started their "liquidation programs" in the Ukraine and later. I remember reading a book where he wrote a letter to his wife about how "future generations of the Reich will not know the burden we carried"or something to that effect that showed real guilt on his mind. I also believe Hitlers shaking left arm was psychological. Again, no evidence,but very plausible. Mysterious Abdo pain is common in people with psychological problems. "conversion disorder" is the proper name.
@@fdllicks Hitler himself also had severe stomach problems. Cramping, pain, and apparently, a tremendous problem with flatulence. Being that he was a vegetarian and Himmler wasn't, we probably could rule out diet.
I think that for both men, it was related to some emotional issue, but I highly doubt it was guilt, as the other commenter suggests.
0
excellent, well narrated. much overlooked, thanks!
There's a gland in the middle of the brain called the pineal gland it helps to regulate sleep empathy and many other personality functions and can become calcified due to being deprived of the sun
Incredibly interesting. My only complaint is the repetitive mispronunciation of Nazi Labor Front Leader, Robert Ley. A common American mistake, based on common pronunciations of Irish surnames such as “Fey.” In German, his surname was pronounced “Lei” with the hard “I.”
Evil is the only hierarchy I know of that always puts its best on top and lines everybody else where they should be on that scale of efficiency. That’s the scariest part.
When he said:“Psychiatry has problems diagnosing cultures” about ISIS animals I learned everything I needed to know about this professor. 44:50
Psychiatry has a hard time diagnosing any cult or religious group no matter who they are if only because psychiatry operates at the level of individuals not collectives. I don’t think he means to dignify their practices so much as he’s stressing a limitation of psychiatry. Culture can be malevolent or sadistic and certainly murderous so it’s not actually incorrect to say IS has a culture even if it sounds horrifying to us, it’s jarring for sure and it sounds euphemistic to me too but it’s not wrong and it’s hardly some endorsement.
Culture is how the people do things.
All “educated” women look at male dominated cultures as pure evil. The smartest and most effective leaders should be on top and everyone knows it, including Maria the fellow traveler liyubman, she just doesn’t like males because she’s jealous of them.
It’s why post modern history courses vilify effective leaders, European and American ones in particular, because women, and Marxist men, are hopeful if they they re-educate into believing that up is down, squares are round and women can be efficient and not emotional in positions of authority of society’s.
If they succeed then the world will suffer more than it ever has before.
The hierarchy you describe is also exactly what happens in business. The "best" at the top, and all the rest arranged according to ability/skill.
@@paigetomkinson1137 the best at what?
The nature of illusion is that it’s designed to make you feel good.
@Tom it’s called being deceived.
And it’s the number one and only warning given to us by Jesus, during His ministry:
DO NOT BE DECEIVED.
WHO put all those "unstable etc" criminals in their posts in the first place?
The older I get the more I find culture interesting and manipulative in some ways. It can definitely affect the individual phsyche. I think it can be very beautiful, but also dangerous. It all depends on what is valuable and meaningful to the culture and who is in charge. Far too often it is money, profit, power, and influence that drives culture today, esp. in the west. Just watch TV or RUclips and look at the ads.
It is mystifying how the greater percentage of Germans and Austrians in the last century could devote such loyalty to the Nazi cause as if the whole country went a bit dotty.
@@jean6872 they went in today’s sociological parlance into mass psychosis or mass formation, a state that we are re-entertaining as a western society.
Spoken like somebody very envious about the wealth and power of others. Envy is malevolence in the flesh. Which means you are a bad person.
Life itself is warshock.
To acknowledge because some are kinfolk that is the quandary of humanity
What role did cocaine and other stimulants play?
How did Hess die at age 90?
Didn’t Plato explain this phenomenon?!
Human race is very influenced by each other , is our nature the marketing people used this from years and that is how they make ir break a product or ideas.
We only can protect ourselves knowing history and learning from the facts.
Yours might be the dumbest comment in this comment section.
One has to also study the ancestorial history and the different traumas Europeans went through way back when they left Africa and mixed with Neanderthals and denovisions earlier then lived in a hierarchical society that partly because of isolation and inbreeding developed many personality disorders and this is what the intellencia refuse to a
Doesn't Dr. Kelly's death sound improbable?
Your intelligence is improbable.
love the pun. enigma, indeed. ....
AND MY POOR FOOL IS HANGED.........NO, NO LIFE.
Like klaus soros and Kissinger.
Riviting is not the word I'd use 😂
That’s because that word, the way you spelled it, isn’t a word, you illiterate. It’s “riveting” you d**b m*******r.
Ink blot tests seem like Freudian mumbo jumbo.
It is Freudian mumbo jumbo. Which coincidentally reminds me that the blots looked like two elephants dancing to me. That might mean these guys would call me a psychopath too.
@@jean6872 There is a lot more to it than what someone says they see. It's a whole context; the words they use, body language, how they interact with the interviewer, etc.
@@paigetomkinson1137 That sounds entirely bereft of science and into the realm of fantasy. It gives psychology a bad name.
@@jean6872 Paying attention to the particular words someone uses, the signals coming from the positioning of their body, and the way in which a person interacts with an interviewer, that's all "mumbo jumbo?" I have to disagree. Words carry our intents and our feelings, even when we don't want them to. Using one particular word when a different one would work, but has a slightly different message behind it, can tell a trained professional a whole lot about someone.
If a person sits in front of an interviewer with their arms firmly held across their chest, that is a definite sign of defensiveness. If they bounce their leg up and down rapidly, it shows lack of patience, anxiety, or even irritation. It also indicates a desire to leave the place they are in. All of those are a form of communication.
You interact with people every day. You can tell, feel it, when someone is being dismissive of you, if they respect you or not, if they're distracted, etc.
Even during a test like the Rorschach, the test subject is communicating with the test giver in all of those ways, and more. The subconscious communications through the things I listed might even give more information to the interviewer than the ink blots themselves. We can all "betray" ourselves to others through all those means on a daily basis, whether we want to or not.
Paying attention to the particular words someone uses, the signals coming from the positioning of their body, and the way in which a person interacts with an interviewer, that's all "mumbo jumbo?" I have to disagree. Words carry our intents and our feelings, even when we don't want them to. Using one particular word when a different one would work, but has a slightly different message behind it, can tell a trained professional a whole lot about someone.
If a person sits in front of an interviewer with their arms firmly held across their chest, that is a definite sign of defensiveness. If they bounce their leg up and down rapidly, it shows lack of patience, anxiety, or even irritation. It also indicates a desire to leave the place they are in. All of those are a form of communication.
You interact with people every day. You can tell, feel it, when someone is being dismissive of you, if they respect you or not, if they're distracted, etc.
Even during a test like the Rorschach, the test subject is communicating with the test giver in all of those ways, and more. The subconscious communications through the things I listed might even give more information to the interviewer than the ink blots themselves. We can all "betray" ourselves to others through all those means on a daily basis, whether we want to or not.
why is the audience laughing???I found nothing to laugh when talking about nazi criminals...
They think the speaker is stating the obvious and their laughing is a signal to him that they get it and think he is trying to be witty.