Deep sympathy on the final story. What makes it even worse, I think, is that if the OP were a girl, people would be actively wanting the DM's name and address to deliver a "personal reminder of how you should treat women"; but as a guy, OP gets only "tsk tsk, sad shame, well anyway..." A man should not feel shamed for holding himself to a higher standard--and wanting to explore certain things only with the right person at the right time. The world needs more of that, not less.
that first DM dodged a bullet. But frankly he should've brought the full context to her tweets. If she's fine with shit talking you publically, she'd better be fine with getting outted in the same way
Main reason he didn't do thar was most likely the fact that he would be further publicizing his own identity that way because his post on Reddit probably had a higher reach than that lady's Twitter Tirade.
Pff, as if that's new. Lawful Stupid paladins have been the bane of the existence of many groups since time immemorial. A lawful stupid cleric is hardly a stretch from there.
can work. Like, most dnd parties leave a trail dead bodies. Sure they kill bandits, monsters, etc. But chances are lots of those were parents or have loved ones. So a dnd party would naturally leave a trail of misery, orphans, and broken families wherever they go. And to make it worse they probably never give it any thought so it can be a lawful good action to kill an entire party in the grand scheme of things.
I will say the death if the hawk got to me, I play a druid(Currently) and made friends with a squirrel I named Cpt. Crunch. A member decided to attempt throw the squirrel in the fire. I just stated. If you do, you will not be safe in the forest. He gave up on the action.
Captain Crunch is a hilarious and adorable name for a squirrel. Also you should probably try to get that player kicked, permanently, for even just playing with the idea, or else leave the group if they can't see how that player deserves to be excised.
I might throw hands on accident if i am actually comfortable with someone touching me and they accidentally touch my neck. It also might be fine one day and a heck no another day.
11:45 "If you want to play an evil campaign and everyone is chill with it, go play an evil campaign... You can do whatever campaign you want in the comfort of your own dnd group. It's your group, as long as everyone is having good time, you are succeeding." This is such an important message for everyone to keep in mind. One group can love a school teen setting with magical girls, while the other a gritty noble intrigue game. Even the graphic 18+ games for some of the people out there to LOOSEN UP with. Find what works for you, find the group that works with it, and be sure everyone is have a good time!
"They seemed to say s-x scenes weren't uncommon" what kind of games did those person played ?!? In all my DnD years as DM and Player, no campaign i had ever needed a s-x contract with magical BDSM. And yes i censor it because you never know with youtube i dont want such a great youtuber being flagged bc of a comment.
Been playing 30 years and I've never seen it either. Most I've ever seen is.. Bard: I want to seduce the bar maid. DM: roll for it. Bard: I pass DM: roll for sexual ability. Bard: *fails miserably* Table: *erupts in laughter* DM: Ok, so *precedes with plot hook*
That last story reminds me of that one time I tried to get one of my friends interested in fish by feeding them to a tiger shark. Luckily sharks don't actually go out of their way to eat people, but after they got out of the hospital they suddenly refused to go to the Aquarium with me, how utterly bewildering. /J
I don't understand this type of GM... Why not just be like: "So you all meet in a tavern... then a giant meteor falls on top of you! All do a DC 9001 Dex saving throw... You all die! I win!"
That last story... Being forced into many many sexual encounters against your will... How the hell could the DM and players not see how blatantly R*pey that was? Cause that's what it is, there's no other way to describe it...
Oh they likely understood what they were doing full well. It's called bullying. Frankly, OP had plenty of grounds to charge his roommate/DM with assault.
The DM wasn't OPs roommate in the third story. he was referring to his friend who was more open sexually than he was and was intent on trying to embarrass him. Edit: OPs roommate WAS the DM as i've been corrected. I got confused by the constant switching of OP referring to them as either or considering OP mentions that roommate was a player in his first game. honestly, I think the roommate had a crush on OP and was handling it way badly.
@Naukumaija Mau-mauI was mistaken because he specifically mentioned that roommate was a fellow player in his first campaign. and the inconsistent switching between DM and roommate didn't make things clear.
So, a practitioner of a kink that revolves around tying people up and physically abusing them while gaslighting them into believing it was all consensual might have a distorted understanding of consent? Imagine my shock.
@@MogofWar manufacturering consent is their way So slow walking people into it is the of the game. BDSM folk are playing at something that is used by kidnappers to do what they want....
Ok, first story was bad, like "PC vs DM" is a really bad mind set to go into DnD with, even more so when its the DM, as they have the power to kill off any character at anytime if they really wanted to, and he did in that last session. Second story was bad, not because of the neutral/evil party, but the fact that the new player wanted to play a lawful good cleric in that kind of party and tried to kill one of the PC's when PvP wasn't allowed, the cleric was the That Guy of that story for sure. The last story was just like "WTF?!", as the fact that the DM forced a player who wasn't ok with ANY of that stuff. But I think the player should have just said that they were not ok with that stuff, and should have either made a new character after that, or just left the campaign, I get the DM was his room mate, but that would have been better than sticking with that character/campaign for over a year.
It really depends, I think. Adversarial DMing is fine if, and only if, the DM deliberately designs the game to be a fair challenge to the players, pledges never to just throw something in they can't handle, and then challenges them to defeat what's in their path by wits and might. Basically next level dungeon crawls where the DM doesn't pull their punches
The DM vs PC mentality in my mind doesn’t work, the DM can just bring in a monster with a CR of 20 or higher to deal with the level 1 party, it’s far to easy for the DM to kill them all, it’s much more fun to create a plot line and see how the players react to it.
Story 1: All I'll say is that being new neither the players nor DM had any real idea of how to role play. Live and learn. Story 2: Cleric's player is totally at fault here. If the party had changed that much it's best just to leave. Story 3: Lesson here- always read the fine print in any contract. Also OP's 'friend' was anything but- serious creep vibes here.
I really hate the stories about DMs trying to win at DnD over players. Be it BS encounters or DMPC-OCs running the show... However having the situation reversed is no fun either. I was running a few games where the players were constantly accusing me of trying to give them cursed items whenever they detected anything with magical properties, and complaining about the encounters being difficult. The magic items they were getting were not cursed - they were minor utility items. And the first encounters admittedly were scary. Like fasting a coupe dozen goblins at once might feel overwhelming, but for this particular encounter there were also a big number of NPCs also fighting the gobbos so the party was not the main focus of the enemy, and after 4th round on a roll would determine if goblins would all disengage and flee - this attack was just a distraction. So in reality this encounter was mostly a target practice for the party, and a cinematic to show that things are real. ((oh, and if you were wondering how the combat with 3 dozen NPCs didn't turn into a slog - the rules for NPCs fighting were simplified to hell. Basically I would move villagers and goblins normally. Then count the pairs engaged in combat and roll that many d6. On 1 or 2 a villager would go down. On 5 or 6 a goblin would. Then for each side count ranged attackers and roll d6s for them. On a 6 an enemy would go down. I had a load d6s from playing WH40K, so all those rolls were a breeze))
The story about the hawk was handled as best as I can see. The owner warned the edge lord that his character would react violently and the bird was still killed. He was warned ooc. I'd have done the same. Everything after is just bad dming
I made it to the end but am wondering if they should just make a new class for this kind of play. Like one that can detention door into a happy place and reemerge into another campaign with better people.
Loosen up...but it's pronounced Sense -Eights, as in the Society of Sensations, their full name. The Sensates is their in-universe (in-multiverse?) nickname. Take it from me, a dork who's been playing since 1992. Oh, and you did pronounce Guvners correctly :p
This “you are stalking my twitter“ aleays confuses me. Is as if i would stand in a bussy street shouting out my thought and then complain that other people hear it.
Loosen up. Also: if you're not comfortable with the setting or the DM, or the other players, take a pass. I know it's hard of one or more is a roommate, but there has to ya solution that works.
So... The sensates arnt all about fucking. They actually are about ALL sensations, good and bad. The caress of a lover as well as the bitter sting of a dagger in the back. If you go in thinking it's a sex group they immediately toss you up
See the experiences thing would work great if like some dude mind melded with him and shared a bunch of weird planer shit with him. Your character now has +4 knowlege the planes.
Last story I think his friend might actually be gay. I might be reading too much into it, but op mentioned consent issues and pining him to the ground 🤔. It's fine, of course, to be gay, if that is the case, but yeah definitely respect people's consent and boundaries.
Eh, instead of "You walked into a big hole", how about "Roll reflex as a sinkhole under you opens" The rest of the encounter was bullshit anyway though
Why is there so much judgemental tone about people playing rogues who sit in the shadowy corners in taverns in these stories? Plenty of people new to D&D will go for character archetypes they've seen and enjoyed in movies and step into roleplaying more comfortably through first acting out how they've seen these archetypes in them. We all love Aragorn. He starts as a shifty looking quiet guy just sitting in a shadowy corner in a tavern watching people. If people do this in D&D games, they should not get any smack for that alone. People are so quick to deem something as just being "edgey", sheesh.
Probably because shitty edgelords choose that archetype majority of the time and end up causing a lot of trouble, tension, annoyance, and discomfort for the group both in and out of game. And when they play that kind of character they never play it correctly. Often choosing to be lone wolves when the entire point of D&D is collaborating.
That last campaign sounds soooo messed up! I'm currently playing Wrath of the Righteous, a Pathfinder module that involves a lot of demons and several succubi, and our GM (my husband irl) omitted any sexual violence heavily implied by the campaign books. I play a mind-effecting enchantress, but I NEVER take romantic or sexual spells because I don't want to make myself, the GM, or our friends uncomfortable (it's creepy enough that my victims think they're my friends, we don't need anything with rapey undercurrents making things worse). The one time in a 3 year campaign my character was intimate with a PC (discussed prior, the characters had a friendship that blossomed into "the world is ending and you're hot" infatuation, and it was done tastefully), we cut to the nightstand after a kiss and left everything up to the players' imaginations. One of the players joked that we should role-play the whole scene for the table, including rolls for diplomacy and acrobatics, but GM's response was, "That kind of role-play will cost you $1.99 a minute." We laughed, and a good time was had by all. Loosen up!
Every time i hear a person say “i grew up conservative, so im uncomfortable about sex” what my brain is hearing is “im actually kinda homophobic, but heres a story about how some asshole was creepy” Mentioning being conservative is currently a red flag at all times for me. Conservative or liberal has literally nothing to do with your Morality, so if you bring it up, it better be relevant! As an example, “i was raised liberal, so my values on sex a fairly open. I played a dnd campaign where my character was harassed and then assaulted” this literally has nothing to do with politics. Just say “i am or am not comfortable with this topic”
Ugh. Some people will take any tiny scrap of power they have and use it to abuse people. If that dude immediately used his power as a GM to coerce a player's character into non-consensual and graphic sexual situations, wtf has he done in real life? So glad my brother GMs to ttrpg campaigns I've played.
When you have to lean onto sexual experiences to join a planar ideology faction, instead of something more unique as "stare into the majestic void of the positive energy plane" or "touch the frozen concept of mercy, before it thaws from the impossibly cold of the paraelemental plane of Ice" to join the Sensates, you cheapen the awe and wonder of Planescape as a whole
![I Used To Be An Anime Girl!?! [Persona Design Chat & Speedpaint]](/img/1.gif)
Deep sympathy on the final story. What makes it even worse, I think, is that if the OP were a girl, people would be actively wanting the DM's name and address to deliver a "personal reminder of how you should treat women"; but as a guy, OP gets only "tsk tsk, sad shame, well anyway..."
A man should not feel shamed for holding himself to a higher standard--and wanting to explore certain things only with the right person at the right time. The world needs more of that, not less.
that first DM dodged a bullet. But frankly he should've brought the full context to her tweets. If she's fine with shit talking you publically, she'd better be fine with getting outted in the same way
Main reason he didn't do thar was most likely the fact that he would be further publicizing his own identity that way because his post on Reddit probably had a higher reach than that lady's Twitter Tirade.
So the newbie Cleric was essentially a lawful good murder hobo?
Now I have seen everything.
Pff, as if that's new. Lawful Stupid paladins have been the bane of the existence of many groups since time immemorial. A lawful stupid cleric is hardly a stretch from there.
can work. Like, most dnd parties leave a trail dead bodies. Sure they kill bandits, monsters, etc. But chances are lots of those were parents or have loved ones. So a dnd party would naturally leave a trail of misery, orphans, and broken families wherever they go. And to make it worse they probably never give it any thought so it can be a lawful good action to kill an entire party in the grand scheme of things.
Last story: CONSENT IS EVERYTHING. The dm/housemate straight-up harassed and assaulted OP >_>
I will say the death if the hawk got to me, I play a druid(Currently) and made friends with a squirrel I named Cpt. Crunch. A member decided to attempt throw the squirrel in the fire. I just stated. If you do, you will not be safe in the forest. He gave up on the action.
Captain Crunch is a hilarious and adorable name for a squirrel.
Also you should probably try to get that player kicked, permanently, for even just playing with the idea, or else leave the group if they can't see how that player deserves to be excised.
Never mind being tackled, if someone just touches me wrong we're going to throw hands. Third op has the patience of a saint.
The DM in that story should not be breathing anymore. He needs his breathing privileges permanently revoked.
I might throw hands on accident if i am actually comfortable with someone touching me and they accidentally touch my neck. It also might be fine one day and a heck no another day.
Not so much patience of a saint, as it likely was a critical lack of self-confidence and social awareness.
@@Draeckon Exactly. He's a whipped dog. He needs therapy and then revisit some of those martial arts classes.
11:45 "If you want to play an evil campaign and everyone is chill with it, go play an evil campaign... You can do whatever campaign you want in the comfort of your own dnd group. It's your group, as long as everyone is having good time, you are succeeding."
This is such an important message for everyone to keep in mind. One group can love a school teen setting with magical girls, while the other a gritty noble intrigue game. Even the graphic 18+ games for some of the people out there to LOOSEN UP with. Find what works for you, find the group that works with it, and be sure everyone is have a good time!
"They seemed to say s-x scenes weren't uncommon" what kind of games did those person played ?!? In all my DnD years as DM and Player, no campaign i had ever needed a s-x contract with magical BDSM.
And yes i censor it because you never know with youtube i dont want such a great youtuber being flagged bc of a comment.
Been playing 30 years and I've never seen it either. Most I've ever seen is..
Bard: I want to seduce the bar maid.
DM: roll for it.
Bard: I pass
DM: roll for sexual ability.
Bard: *fails miserably*
Table: *erupts in laughter*
DM: Ok, so *precedes with plot hook*
I laugh so high with the "Visible Asexual Confusion".
and
That video was great!
That last story reminds me of that one time I tried to get one of my friends interested in fish by feeding them to a tiger shark. Luckily sharks don't actually go out of their way to eat people, but after they got out of the hospital they suddenly refused to go to the Aquarium with me, how utterly bewildering.
/J
I don't understand this type of GM... Why not just be like: "So you all meet in a tavern... then a giant meteor falls on top of you! All do a DC 9001 Dex saving throw... You all die! I win!"
too instant you need to torture your players more
That last story... Being forced into many many sexual encounters against your will...
How the hell could the DM and players not see how blatantly R*pey that was? Cause that's what it is, there's no other way to describe it...
The real question is, how was that DM not stabbed in his sleep?
Oh they likely understood what they were doing full well. It's called bullying. Frankly, OP had plenty of grounds to charge his roommate/DM with assault.
The DM wasn't OPs roommate in the third story. he was referring to his friend who was more open sexually than he was and was intent on trying to embarrass him.
Edit: OPs roommate WAS the DM as i've been corrected. I got confused by the constant switching of OP referring to them as either or considering OP mentions that roommate was a player in his first game.
honestly, I think the roommate had a crush on OP and was handling it way badly.
@Naukumaija Mau-mauI was mistaken because he specifically mentioned that roommate was a fellow player in his first campaign. and the inconsistent switching between DM and roommate didn't make things clear.
Was just about to right that about roomie. Sounds like a six year old pulling a girls hair.
Y'know, for someone into BDSM this lad sure does have a poor understanding of consent...
So, a practitioner of a kink that revolves around tying people up and physically abusing them while gaslighting them into believing it was all consensual might have a distorted understanding of consent? Imagine my shock.
@@MogofWar sperg
@@MogofWar manufacturering consent is their way
So slow walking people into it is the of the game.
BDSM folk are playing at something that is used by kidnappers to do what they want....
Don't worry, this allo gal is right here with you in the confusion. My insides wanted to crawl up my spine at the story.
"Loosen up."
O god
Exit only.
OMG RUN!
That third story sounds almost like he had unresolved sexual feelings for them and that's how he was (inappropriately) expressing it???
Ok, first story was bad, like "PC vs DM" is a really bad mind set to go into DnD with, even more so when its the DM, as they have the power to kill off any character at anytime if they really wanted to, and he did in that last session.
Second story was bad, not because of the neutral/evil party, but the fact that the new player wanted to play a lawful good cleric in that kind of party and tried to kill one of the PC's when PvP wasn't allowed, the cleric was the That Guy of that story for sure.
The last story was just like "WTF?!", as the fact that the DM forced a player who wasn't ok with ANY of that stuff. But I think the player should have just said that they were not ok with that stuff, and should have either made a new character after that, or just left the campaign, I get the DM was his room mate, but that would have been better than sticking with that character/campaign for over a year.
It really depends, I think. Adversarial DMing is fine if, and only if, the DM deliberately designs the game to be a fair challenge to the players, pledges never to just throw something in they can't handle, and then challenges them to defeat what's in their path by wits and might. Basically next level dungeon crawls where the DM doesn't pull their punches
The DM vs PC mentality in my mind doesn’t work, the DM can just bring in a monster with a CR of 20 or higher to deal with the level 1 party, it’s far to easy for the DM to kill them all, it’s much more fun to create a plot line and see how the players react to it.
The first one the DM didn’t even let them choose to go that way, he railroaded them into a TPK… yikes. Glad they let that guy go.
Story 1: All I'll say is that being new neither the players nor DM had any real idea of how to role play. Live and learn.
Story 2: Cleric's player is totally at fault here. If the party had changed that much it's best just to leave.
Story 3: Lesson here- always read the fine print in any contract. Also OP's 'friend' was anything but- serious creep vibes here.
Being new at the game is not an excuse for being a complete and total [expletive].
I really hate the stories about DMs trying to win at DnD over players. Be it BS encounters or DMPC-OCs running the show...
However having the situation reversed is no fun either. I was running a few games where the players were constantly accusing me of trying to give them cursed items whenever they detected anything with magical properties, and complaining about the encounters being difficult.
The magic items they were getting were not cursed - they were minor utility items.
And the first encounters admittedly were scary. Like fasting a coupe dozen goblins at once might feel overwhelming, but for this particular encounter there were also a big number of NPCs also fighting the gobbos so the party was not the main focus of the enemy, and after 4th round on a roll would determine if goblins would all disengage and flee - this attack was just a distraction.
So in reality this encounter was mostly a target practice for the party, and a cinematic to show that things are real.
((oh, and if you were wondering how the combat with 3 dozen NPCs didn't turn into a slog - the rules for NPCs fighting were simplified to hell. Basically I would move villagers and goblins normally. Then count the pairs engaged in combat and roll that many d6. On 1 or 2 a villager would go down. On 5 or 6 a goblin would.
Then for each side count ranged attackers and roll d6s for them. On a 6 an enemy would go down.
I had a load d6s from playing WH40K, so all those rolls were a breeze))
The Marble City... on fire? That's not how marble works!
The story about the hawk was handled as best as I can see. The owner warned the edge lord that his character would react violently and the bird was still killed. He was warned ooc. I'd have done the same. Everything after is just bad dming
I made it to the end but am wondering if they should just make a new class for this kind of play. Like one that can detention door into a happy place and reemerge into another campaign with better people.
Man that first story. Big oof
Loosen up...but it's pronounced Sense -Eights, as in the Society of Sensations, their full name. The Sensates is their in-universe (in-multiverse?) nickname. Take it from me, a dork who's been playing since 1992. Oh, and you did pronounce Guvners correctly :p
They sound like they could actually be a cool faction if they're not played by an absolutely psychopath IRL-rapist DM.
I firmly believe that his roommate had sexual tension towards him.
I usually drink a cup of coffee to *loosen up* before DMing.
This “you are stalking my twitter“ aleays confuses me.
Is as if i would stand in a bussy street shouting out my thought and then complain that other people hear it.
I hit my wine glass on my tooth waiting to type “loosen up, buttercup.”
I'm baffled at how people sometimes ignore others. If I don't want politics in my campaign, I don't want them. Same for smex.
Loosen up.
Also: if you're not comfortable with the setting or the DM, or the other players, take a pass. I know it's hard of one or more is a roommate, but there has to ya solution that works.
The guy in the first story did not know what he was doing. Bad GM. Bad😂
I love your videos
Was the weretiger in that third story Tony the Tiger? Cus that would be grrrrrrrrstill creepy
So... The sensates arnt all about fucking. They actually are about ALL sensations, good and bad. The caress of a lover as well as the bitter sting of a dagger in the back. If you go in thinking it's a sex group they immediately toss you up
Loosen up...
uhhh... Anyone else thinks the dm had an unhealthy obsession with the OP?
For the last story, the roommate had a crush on the OP...clearly 😐
Random ambushes under the guise of 'training'??? What is this, D&D or Bleach? Ichigo's dad pulled that crap on him too often.
Yup Guvner is pronounced Governor.
I'm a very sex repulsed asexual, so the last story really hit me with slight psychic damage from imagining myself in OP's shoes.
See the experiences thing would work great if like some dude mind melded with him and shared a bunch of weird planer shit with him. Your character now has +4 knowlege the planes.
That roommate in the third story was abusive and toxic, IRL and in game. I hope OP for completely clear of him after that hell year.
Loosen Up!
Loosen up lol
Why kill why not try an save them
Because that would require some amount of thinking and that would be totally out of character for a lawful stupid character
Loosen up.
Loosen up!
Last story I think his friend might actually be gay. I might be reading too much into it, but op mentioned consent issues and pining him to the ground 🤔. It's fine, of course, to be gay, if that is the case, but yeah definitely respect people's consent and boundaries.
Sensates is pronounced sen-sates as in “sensations.”
Visible Asexual Confusion is my constant state of being tbh.
Eh, instead of "You walked into a big hole", how about "Roll reflex as a sinkhole under you opens" The rest of the encounter was bullshit anyway though
BDSM story.....man choose to play in that campaign for a year..... and letting him be pinned by his roommate
Why is there so much judgemental tone about people playing rogues who sit in the shadowy corners in taverns in these stories? Plenty of people new to D&D will go for character archetypes they've seen and enjoyed in movies and step into roleplaying more comfortably through first acting out how they've seen these archetypes in them. We all love Aragorn. He starts as a shifty looking quiet guy just sitting in a shadowy corner in a tavern watching people. If people do this in D&D games, they should not get any smack for that alone. People are so quick to deem something as just being "edgey", sheesh.
Probably because shitty edgelords choose that archetype majority of the time and end up causing a lot of trouble, tension, annoyance, and discomfort for the group both in and out of game.
And when they play that kind of character they never play it correctly. Often choosing to be lone wolves when the entire point of D&D is collaborating.
Loosen up
That last campaign sounds soooo messed up! I'm currently playing Wrath of the Righteous, a Pathfinder module that involves a lot of demons and several succubi, and our GM (my husband irl) omitted any sexual violence heavily implied by the campaign books. I play a mind-effecting enchantress, but I NEVER take romantic or sexual spells because I don't want to make myself, the GM, or our friends uncomfortable (it's creepy enough that my victims think they're my friends, we don't need anything with rapey undercurrents making things worse). The one time in a 3 year campaign my character was intimate with a PC (discussed prior, the characters had a friendship that blossomed into "the world is ending and you're hot" infatuation, and it was done tastefully), we cut to the nightstand after a kiss and left everything up to the players' imaginations. One of the players joked that we should role-play the whole scene for the table, including rolls for diplomacy and acrobatics, but GM's response was, "That kind of role-play will cost you $1.99 a minute." We laughed, and a good time was had by all.
Loosen up!
Where's sexual harassment panda when you need him
Probably still on the Island of Misfit Mascots
Loosen upp
Loosen w
Every time i hear a person say “i grew up conservative, so im uncomfortable about sex” what my brain is hearing is “im actually kinda homophobic, but heres a story about how some asshole was creepy”
Mentioning being conservative is currently a red flag at all times for me. Conservative or liberal has literally nothing to do with your Morality, so if you bring it up, it better be relevant!
As an example, “i was raised liberal, so my values on sex a fairly open. I played a dnd campaign where my character was harassed and then assaulted” this literally has nothing to do with politics. Just say “i am or am not comfortable with this topic”
Ugh. Some people will take any tiny scrap of power they have and use it to abuse people. If that dude immediately used his power as a GM to coerce a player's character into non-consensual and graphic sexual situations, wtf has he done in real life? So glad my brother GMs to ttrpg campaigns I've played.
Which is why I thing that DM needed his breathing privileges permanently revoked.
When you have to lean onto sexual experiences to join a planar ideology faction, instead of something more unique as "stare into the majestic void of the positive energy plane" or "touch the frozen concept of mercy, before it thaws from the impossibly cold of the paraelemental plane of Ice" to join the Sensates, you cheapen the awe and wonder of Planescape as a whole
I fucking knew there had to be more to them.
Not that a fucking rapist (the DM) would understand any of that.
tbh. I think the DM at the end is just being funny. He is just taking the piss out of his friend and room-mate. Dont think its that bad.
Loosen up!
Loosen up.
Loosen up.