It's been seeral years now, and still think Zeinab Badawi doesn't pay attention to what the Laureatues are saying. When camera focus on her, while getting and answer, she's constantly looking at her notes, like checking boxes about what she needed to say and what comes next, very little engagement. Also I don't mind editing these videos short, but please, have a longer conversation, as much as the Laureates feel (say 2 hrs), and later just make a less than an 1hr video!
well you know what guys...dont blame the host. We all know how difficult it is when managing the talk between so many great minds at the same time. She tried her best...just to keep the talk concise and cater to...basically all ppl.
Just came back here to say that Bob Wilson (mentor of an Economics winner in the video) just won a Nobel prize himself for Economics. 14:58 if you want to see the moment where he's being appreciated here
funny thing: 2019 they still dont care about how bad host is) every year i try my best to ignore her SAME behavior: waving your hands, constantly looking at notes, interrupting people, terribly awkward to finish the answers of the winners or insert their own lines
@@rtnjo6936 yes I agree, its shamefully to see that kind of behavior. It needs to be someone who can dig into concepts, otherwise, the main reason why they are there is lost.
Nice initiative. I'd suggest in the coming years you get Science based popular writers or journalists to moderate . Zain seems to rush these great minds as if it's a movie interview! We need people who can actually break down these issues more fundamentally also providing a broader perspective. I wouldn't mind someone like Lawrence Krauss, Neil Degrasee Tyson, Lisa Randall or other popular scienc writers
They obviously ignored your advice. In the 2017 round Rainer Weiss told Zain that she hadn't listened properly to what one of the laureates had just said. So clearly it's bothering some of them too.
Student questions and statements about young scientists etc are so unnecessary. I want to hear the laureates talk about their research and challenge each other on ideas.
Great -- Great news. Great work -- Great Nobel Minds. Dear respected, honourable and beloved Noble- Laureates Sir/ Mam, at first heartiest Congratulations. We proud to see videos. I m from INDIA.
The journalist was pretty bad, not understanding what these people were trying to say, going in a silly methodistic manner. The best thing thing would have been to let them talk amongst themselves.
Ross Healea wouldn’t that be epic? I think we just found an untapped niche right there. I mean people are into long form podcasts as it is. why not turn it into a group thing?
I believe as quoted by many whom i knew that one of major difference between Laureates and other is Laureates have freedom and time with no such interruption in life, where other who may achieve beyond struggle on daily base to move ahead and face daily opposite sides, if we put this in a small scale urban example and define the overall life cycle not all subject define the same input and output within the question whom and why which define underline in-between
How does this woman get the chair? You need an intellect to chair theses men -someone who already understands how to access their minds. Prof Jom Al-Khalili would be excellent.
Every year she irritatingly asks about application stuff. And every year the laureates answer that they do fundamental science, without any thought of application. Science doesn't necessarily need an application ! Why doesn't she understand??!
My time is well invested here! DOES ANYONE KNOW THE FEMALE STUDENT WHOSE NAME SOUNDS LIKE "Kirsten Copeland"? She wears glasses in this footage, and she mentioned her PhD (in economics, I guess!). I want to read what she writes.
Some of the worst consequences of Brexit will be in the sphere of science. To that extent Brexit is a fit subject for scientists to discuss because it will directly impact the sciences. You could justifiably say that Brexit is not only political and an attempt to characterise Brexit as only political means gagging scientists. So I found your remark more telling about you than your remark was telling about her.
This is disgusting. The fact that everyone was silent for awhile after the qus was asked showed that it was an inappropriate topic that no one was expecting...
I think people hate the fact that the host is black. They are not aware of this but it's an innate disgust they have. Like how would you expect the topics to be deeper than they already are in this discussion? How long would it take? If you want deeper indulgence, grab a book and study. This is media not a lecture class. Great work Zeina Bidawi... P.S. Also notice how the talk has many scenes cut off for the sake of time I presume. So don't go around saying she is a bad host. Even the Laureates would be disappointed of your view. I noticed a different host last year and that's ok too, no need to compare and shame. Amazing minds in one room 👏👏
Erm, you should watch the 2017 edition. She was told off by Rainer Weiss for not listening to what a laureate had just said and for asking a stupid non-relevant follow-up question. I think she does an ok job, but not better than ok. It is what it is.
i think they will keep having her regardless of public approval. its stupid but shes hosted all of the interviews with negative feedback. doesn't realize the greatness around her or she does but wants to compensate for their intelligence with ignorance and aggression.
what is the point of Nobel Minds? Soe Nobel prize winners, such as Paul Nurse and Venki, have said, that many non Nobel prize winners, are just as good scienitists. Many great scientists never win Nobel prizes.
Thanks for your kind presentation. May I help those who are commenting and watching this, what are Nobel minds??? It may help the watchers as they may be interested to share Nobel ideas or they might be nobels and didn't realize. We are are born with instinct to take or possess or do something and expect to be paid but special people are those who have the ability to give without waiting to be paid. That's the start of nobel mind. Which can easily be done to those around you, starting from family, friends, colleagues etc Very simple to start the idea Wish you all the best of luck Stay home Stay safe to save others That's a nobel act
Well a Chinese black trans woman unified gravity and quantum theory but the academy are sino-trans phobic white supremacists so obviously they couldn't nominate her
Kristine to answer your question you cute btw. In my relative mind. Don’t worry about how that makes you feel it makes me happy lol how do you react to that. People are unwillingly going against factual evidence in 2016 to present day for a number of possible reasons maybe infinite. No one can honesty really understand someone else’s mind. But taking a number of general views and understanding That in the past the same has gone on like Galileo. People went against the idea that the earth wasn’t the center of the “universe” or our solar system because they weren’t informed. They needed evidence to prove it right and to reach a scientific consensus. By time and by people who are associated with pop earth culture. They have the greatest influence on young minds who then grow up to see factual evidence. So now with the internet. False words and phrases can be shown to someone with no understanding or it could connect or stem from a view they believe will never lie to them. Which is a lie. Like religion._. That’s one of my awnsers. I could come up with an infinite amount of them if you have the time 🌎🧙🏽♂️🧿
Don't miss Nobel Minds 2023 with this year's class of laureates. See it here: ruclips.net/video/VM8K8RnnfDM/видео.html
I share with you my frends, I am Nicaragua
It's been seeral years now, and still think Zeinab Badawi doesn't pay attention to what the Laureatues are saying. When camera focus on her, while getting and answer, she's constantly looking at her notes, like checking boxes about what she needed to say and what comes next, very little engagement. Also I don't mind editing these videos short, but please, have a longer conversation, as much as the Laureates feel (say 2 hrs), and later just make a less than an 1hr video!
iv noticed tht also bt im sure she's still listening to what they're saying
it could be because she couldn't keep up I mean different sciences for sure that is a deep conversation
she is only there for the investors!
she facilitates the table on a firm time so she is doing a good job cutting off gently. otherwise, i do see she is a subtle host.
She's making funny faces throughout the debate.
Maybe the host should be a scientist aswell. These conversations dont go deep enough.
Should get a hippie tripping on two tabs to ask the real hard hitting questions
well you know what guys...dont blame the host. We all know how difficult it is when managing the talk between so many great minds at the same time. She tried her best...just to keep the talk concise and cater to...basically all ppl.
Who cares what the students have to say. I think most people watching this would be happy to see the audience gone.
ikr
I don't think so. Did you notice "Kirsten Copeland"? Who is she?
Did you notice "Kirsten Copeland"? Who is she?
Just came back here to say that Bob Wilson (mentor of an Economics winner in the video) just won a Nobel prize himself for Economics. 14:58 if you want to see the moment where he's being appreciated here
Awesome news. Grats to him!
Why do you get all these great minds together and make them talk about petty politics.
That's almost insulting their genius.
Did you notice "Kirsten Copeland"? Who is she?
If you want to interview the brightest minds in science please have a host who has genuine enthusiasm !
vary true
most girls are not into that type of stuff
funny thing: 2019 they still dont care about how bad host is) every year i try my best to ignore her SAME behavior: waving your hands, constantly looking at notes, interrupting people, terribly awkward to finish the answers of the winners or insert their own lines
@@fightfannerd2078 i disagree from experience because the number of girls
studying sciences are increasing massively
@@rtnjo6936 yes I agree, its shamefully to see that kind of behavior. It needs to be someone who can dig into concepts, otherwise, the main reason why they are there is lost.
Man, it would be hilarious with Bob there. lol
It would be like:
Hey Bob, what do you think of...?
*interrupts Bulshit yup, that's what it is.
Did you notice "Kirsten Copeland"? Who is she?
Who's Bob?
Well that's the reason he isn't there
@@CamRebires you can guess whos missing from 016 novelists
Nice initiative. I'd suggest in the coming years you get Science based popular writers or journalists to moderate . Zain seems to rush these great minds as if it's a movie interview! We need people who can actually break down these issues more fundamentally also providing a broader perspective. I wouldn't mind someone like Lawrence Krauss, Neil Degrasee Tyson, Lisa Randall or other popular scienc writers
It's a shame Stephen Hawking can't speak properly. How about him as a interviewer?
Krauss and Tyson are not 'writers'.
@@Nautilus1972 yep especially Krauss, he's still doing research! Unlike Tyson tho
They obviously ignored your advice. In the 2017 round Rainer Weiss told Zain that she hadn't listened properly to what one of the laureates had just said. So clearly it's bothering some of them too.
Student questions and statements about young scientists etc are so unnecessary. I want to hear the laureates talk about their research and challenge each other on ideas.
Did you notice "Kirsten Copeland"? Who is she?
The complaints about this moderator has become a theme of the comments. She’s not stopping these men from speaking. Listen to them.
Is intervew very nice to this man, than given your know for human, I am ingering chenistry, agree from Nicaragua
I think this is an informative and well moderated show …… based on the information I get here through the years , I get ideas for myself
Ladies would, and keep bringing in a unique and essential flavor to science. Looking forward to more.
Great -- Great news. Great work -- Great Nobel Minds. Dear respected, honourable and beloved Noble- Laureates Sir/ Mam, at first heartiest Congratulations. We proud to see videos. I m from INDIA.
The journalist was pretty bad, not understanding what these people were trying to say, going in a silly methodistic manner. The best thing thing would have been to let them talk amongst themselves.
Aritra Sinha ikr ... she's so cringy
my goddd that must have been nerve-racking to present
There is a clash between idealism (from the laureates) and realism (from audience)
anyone know a youtube channel or website where intellectuals gather and discuss ideas in longform without interruptions?
no kidding!!
Ross Healea wouldn’t that be epic? I think we just found an untapped niche right there. I mean people are into long form podcasts as it is. why not turn it into a group thing?
@@albierodriguez9797 try the partially examined life
Yes albie Rodriguez there is ted talk and and scientific festival on RUclips.
And think ideas
Congrats sir for winning noble prize in area of economics oliver and hole and micheal
1 hr? make it at least 3 hrs
Did you notice "Kirsten Copeland"? Who is she?
I believe as quoted by many whom i knew that one of major difference between Laureates and other is Laureates have freedom and time with no such interruption in life, where other who may achieve beyond struggle on daily base to move ahead and face daily opposite sides, if we put this in a small scale urban example and define the overall life cycle not all subject define the same input and output within the question whom and why which define underline in-between
What a fun way to end the conversation! 😎
Great，What the great minds think are very difficult.
How does this woman get the chair? You need an intellect to chair theses men -someone who already understands how to access their minds. Prof Jom Al-Khalili would be excellent.
We proud to see video❤Congratulation😍🌍🫠
The problem is that good minds ,thinking is not in media ,the public does not know the importance of education.
You cannot develop a smartphone based on an opinion
Who edited this??? you should post the whole video without cuts!
Did you notice "Kirsten Copeland"? Who is she?
good discussion. where is nobelite for literature here?
Bob Dylan is not there. Man I wish he was.
Every year she irritatingly asks about application stuff. And every year the laureates answer that they do fundamental science, without any thought of application. Science doesn't necessarily need an application ! Why doesn't she understand??!
My time is well invested here!
DOES ANYONE KNOW THE FEMALE STUDENT WHOSE NAME SOUNDS LIKE "Kirsten Copeland"?
She wears glasses in this footage, and she mentioned her PhD (in economics, I guess!). I want to read what she writes.
Where's Dylan?
Everyone being too hard on the lady. Every years video.
22:54
Host makes this conversation political. Really petty attempt.
Some of the worst consequences of Brexit will be in the sphere of science. To that extent Brexit is a fit subject for scientists to discuss because it will directly impact the sciences. You could justifiably say that Brexit is not only political and an attempt to characterise Brexit as only political means gagging scientists. So I found your remark more telling about you than your remark was telling about her.
Economics is politics, so what is the problem?
This is disgusting. The fact that everyone was silent for awhile after the qus was asked showed that it was an inappropriate topic that no one was expecting...
@@ivanong9648 and you did hear the reply,right?. Brexit is bad confirmed by noble laureate scientists and economists.
What about the wrong questions?
In a conversation with some of the greatest minds, the main theme of the conversation in the comments is the host. Do better Nobel Minds 2016.
make it 2 hours!
where is my bob dylan?
The Origin of Life is Chemical Synthesis.Marine algae(green seaweed):Cellulose is a cell.
The elite vs the masses came up. Must they clash, or work together?
Nice talk, I enjoyed it. Although at some points it got me to think and convinced that you can be talented but not necessarily intelligent.
Oliver Hart sounds like Christopher Hitchens.
Imagine Bob Dylan in this discussion, lol 😂 If don't get it, watch some earlier interview of Dylan 🥴
I think people hate the fact that the host is black. They are not aware of this but it's an innate disgust they have.
Like how would you expect the topics to be deeper than they already are in this discussion? How long would it take? If you want deeper indulgence, grab a book and study. This is media not a lecture class. Great work Zeina Bidawi...
P.S. Also notice how the talk has many scenes cut off for the sake of time I presume. So don't go around saying she is a bad host. Even the Laureates would be disappointed of your view.
I noticed a different host last year and that's ok too, no need to compare and shame. Amazing minds in one room 👏👏
They say they hate her rushing through her list with no response to the answers
@@edwardjones2202 well it's not her fault she has limited time and she is ot a scintist
Erm, you should watch the 2017 edition. She was told off by Rainer Weiss for not listening to what a laureate had just said and for asking a stupid non-relevant follow-up question. I think she does an ok job, but not better than ok. It is what it is.
Cosmig Gate ❤
28:18 there’s the limit. You said it. Don’t think of a limit or say a limit 😂👌
45:27 My animal spirit
Imagine being the presenter.. Being a in room full of people who's smarter, and probably much more important to human race.
3:19
"Impossible is a word to be found only in the dictionary of fools"
- Napolean Bonaparte
You're trying to call a nobel prize winner stupid?
Literature to Literaries (my concoction).
Yep saw this onee too haha the ending is soo akward
i think they will keep having her regardless of public approval. its stupid but shes hosted all of the interviews with negative feedback. doesn't realize the greatness around her or she does but wants to compensate for their intelligence with ignorance and aggression.
🌱💚
what is the point of Nobel Minds? Soe Nobel prize winners, such as Paul Nurse and Venki, have said, that many non Nobel prize winners, are just as good scienitists. Many great scientists never win Nobel prizes.
👍
The host is so mis matched for the occasion .... She pertains to be commentatior of a funny show among the funny jokers....
Thanks for your kind presentation.
May I help those who are commenting and watching this, what are Nobel minds???
It may help the watchers as they may be interested to share Nobel ideas or they might be nobels and didn't realize.
We are are born with instinct to take or possess or do something and expect to be paid but special people are those who have the ability to give without waiting to be paid.
That's the start of nobel mind.
Which can easily be done to those around you, starting from family, friends, colleagues etc
Very simple to start the idea
Wish you all the best of luck
Stay home
Stay safe to save others
That's a nobel act
#smartmentors
🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘
That woman is annoying.
How come there are only white men every year ?
a possible coincident? there are quite a few Asian noble laureates and an increasing amount of women winning the award
Well a Chinese black trans woman unified gravity and quantum theory but the academy are sino-trans phobic white supremacists so obviously they couldn't nominate her
This curator is terrifying. I will not watch this show anymore.
Kristine to answer your question you cute btw. In my relative mind. Don’t worry about how that makes you feel it makes me happy lol how do you react to that. People are unwillingly going against factual evidence in 2016 to present day for a number of possible reasons maybe infinite. No one can honesty really understand someone else’s mind. But taking a number of general views and understanding
That in the past the same has gone on like Galileo. People went against the idea that the earth wasn’t the center of the “universe” or our solar system because they weren’t informed. They needed evidence to prove it right and to reach a scientific consensus. By time and by people who are associated with pop earth culture. They have the greatest influence on young minds who then grow up to see factual evidence. So now with the internet. False words and phrases can be shown to someone with no understanding or it could connect or stem from a view they believe will never lie to them. Which is a lie. Like religion._. That’s one of my awnsers. I could come up with an infinite amount of them if you have the time 🌎🧙🏽♂️🧿
2025
S