An introduction to Sappho

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @laineypedigo578
    @laineypedigo578 4 года назад +160

    Love learning about my gay queen

  • @deliri0um
    @deliri0um 4 года назад +52

    How can anyone possibly say she wasn't gay, when she says delicious laughter?

    • @FireBlaster3000
      @FireBlaster3000 4 года назад +4

      I have delicious laughter towards my burger

    • @rahathassan9694
      @rahathassan9694 4 года назад +1

      @@FireBlaster3000 my gosh😂....

    • @Dianellier
      @Dianellier 4 года назад +14

      There are people who believe she's actually a man. SMH

    • @rahathassan9694
      @rahathassan9694 4 года назад +1

      @@Dianellier well, that's a possibility

    • @psandbergnz
      @psandbergnz 3 года назад +1

      Dina, the poem does not necessarily portray sexual love. Sappho is pining because the man will be taking the girl away from Sappho's school, probably to marry her (that's why he is talking to her). She is fond of the girl, that's true, but the poem does not necessarily depict sexual desire on the part of Sappho. The girl is probably in her early teens, and Sappho is much older.

  • @Caambrinus
    @Caambrinus 5 лет назад +30

    Sappho, as Dr Orrells forgot to say (!), is clearly describing the process of falling in love (anyone who ever has, will recognise the symptoms immediately); the man is compared to a god, because (a) he can publicly occupy a space which Sappho cannot and (b) because he is directly communicating with Sappho's beloved. Not for nothing was this poem 'translated' beautifully by Catullus (poem 51), the fruit of what was probably a similar experience re Lesbia (who is, of course, named for Sappho).

  • @existenceispain_geekthesiren
    @existenceispain_geekthesiren 3 года назад +7

    ...I was looking for this, not denying, but I thought this was Vsauce.

  • @mwbright
    @mwbright 4 года назад +39

    The Catholic and Greek Orthodox churches destroyed all these great works on the same day back in the 12th century, so people wouldn't 'waste their time reading, when they could be praying." They were burned on two giant bonfires, one in Rome and another in Byzantium. That's why we don't have Sappho's full works today. As a result, I've been filled with nothing but contempt, even hatred for those two institutions for my entire life.

    • @tinibari456
      @tinibari456 4 года назад +1

      Any source for that?

    • @mattalrich2667
      @mattalrich2667 4 года назад +3

      Those two institutions were pretty bad, but we don't really have concrete evidence that they did that. The people claiming that they did lived mostly in the late Renaissance, hundreds of years after such things happened. There are no contemporary sources claiming this to be valid and the people claiming these things did have a bit of an anti-church bias.

    • @Rhyster
      @Rhyster 3 года назад

      @@tinibari456 There was a french scholar called Joseph Scaligar who claimed that during the middle ages they destroyed a lot of classical texts including Sappho. He says some dude called Pope Gregory V11 in 1076 ordered all clasical writing that had elements of promiscuty or lasciviousity to be burnt down (including Sappho)

  • @makenzieread9956
    @makenzieread9956 Год назад +2

    somehow this presentation is both dead and alive.