HUGE NEWS! Boeing Starliner In SERIOUS Stuck While SpaceX Starship #5 Surging...Weekly

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
  • HUGE NEWS! Boeing Starliner In SERIOUS Stuck While SpaceX Starship #5 Surging...Weekly #137
    ===
    00:00: Starliner’s new delay and its impact
    06:22: Starliner’s problems
    10:31: Starliner’s next schedule
    12:57: Starliner’s future
    16:21: Starliner’s delay
    18:23: B14.1 catching test
    22:22: SpaceX's Flight 5 proposing mission license
    26:32: Landing Starship on droneship
    33:14: Other methods
    36:50: S30’s new heat shield
    40:52: Starship’s new design and its impacts
    48:08: Changes in related systems
    50:22: Falcon Heavy’s mission
    53:37: China’s preparations for the Moon race
    ====
    #greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa
    ==
    Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
    ===
    SpaceX Starship SN
    Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
    www.patreon.co...
    ===
    HUGE NEWS! Boeing Starliner In SERIOUS Stuck While SpaceX Starship #5 Surging...Weekly #137
    What goes up must come down!
    That's the mantra for most space missions, but it seems Starliner is breaking the mold. Yes, the return date for this spacecraft continues to be delayed.
    Last month, many were frustrated and disappointed as the launch of Starliner CFT-1 faced continuous delays. Five delays, including three due to helium leaks, are unacceptable for a crewed spacecraft. Despite these issues, NASA and Boeing pushed forward with the mission, and now they're facing the consequences.
    HUGE NEWS! Boeing Starliner In SERIOUS Stuck While SpaceX Starship #5 Surging...Weekly #137
    In the previous episode, I asked if Starliner could return on June 22. Most of you were correct in saying it couldn't. According to NASA's recent update, Starliner's return schedule has been changed. The notice states: “Teams from NASA and Boeing are now targeting no earlier than 10:10 p.m. EDT Tuesday, June 25, for the undocking of the Starliner spacecraft from the International Space Station.”
    HUGE NEWS! Boeing Starliner In SERIOUS Stuck While SpaceX Starship #5 Surging...Weekly #137
    Thus, the schedule has been delayed an additional three days compared to the previous plan. NASA explained, "mission teams supporting NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test continue to review Starliner's data from the completed test objectives." Steve Stich, manager of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, added, "We want to give our teams a little bit more time to look at the data, do some analysis, and make sure we're really ready to come home." Mark Nappi, Vice President of Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program, clarified, “We fully intend to eliminate these common nuisances [the helium leak and thruster issues] for the flight [Starliner-1].”
    Once again, we see them struggling with the helium leak problem and propulsion issues.
    ----
    We use images and content in accordance with the RUclips Fair Use copyright guidelines: www.youtube.co...
    Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
    To be resolved, thank you.

Комментарии • 480

  • @Wolf-hd9ke
    @Wolf-hd9ke 3 месяца назад +11

    Nappi needs to learn the difference between a "nuisance" and a "serious problem". "My spacesuit is a little tight" is a nuisance. "Five thrusters are malfunctioning due to helium leaks" is a serious problem.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад +2

      Yeah

    • @slartybarfastb3648
      @slartybarfastb3648 3 месяца назад +1

      Every day that passes means less helium remaining. The leaks have not stopped. Each delay means their safety margin is reduced. Suppose new leaks appear after they depart the station or more thrusters go offline. It isn't only 5 out of 28 thrusters. Each thruster is oriented to provide a specific directional impulse. X, Y, or Z axis. If 3 failed thrusters control the x-axis, only 6 would remain or 30% reduction in x-axis control. By losing that amount, Y and Z axis would also be reduced because if they operate at 80-90% compared to 60% on the other axis, there will be a mismatch. Thus Y and Z can only operate at the level of the failing axis. So, a 30% reduction of one thruster axis requires a 30% reduction of all axis.

    • @dakrontu
      @dakrontu 3 месяца назад +1

      @Wolf-hd9ke I agree. Neil Armstrong as I recall was one of two Gemini astronauts who nearly died when a thruster failed ON, putting the craft into a spin so fast that they nearly blacked out. Do we want to see that happen again? Thrusters can fail ON, OFF, or MAYBE. None are good. And they are critical to obtaining and maintaining orientation during re-entry. Would you drive your car if the steering had a mind of its own?
      How do they even measure remaining Helium? I suspect the situation will be 'resolved' by the Helium running out such that the craft has to be abandoned. Furthermore, that means it won't be going ANYWHERE, not even leaving the ISS, where it will be a dead duck, blocking an exit port permanently. It will need a tow truck to get rid of it. You can't just send out a couple of space walkers to give it a push. What goes around comes around. An orbit later it will hit the ISS.
      Stuck on the ISS like a frog growing out of a guy's head. Doctor asks how long ago this started. Frog says it began as a wart on his ass.

  • @matthanrath497
    @matthanrath497 3 месяца назад +7

    The stress of waiting creates subconscious fears of dangerous consequences relying on a star liner compared to that of SpaceX!
    Bob and Doug should be conveying their sentiments on future launches for astronauts safety and comfort!
    👍😎💯🇨🇦

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад

      ♥️♥️♥️

    • @CharlesYuditsky
      @CharlesYuditsky 3 месяца назад +1

      Subconsious? Nope, not allowed to be expressed!

    • @matthanrath497
      @matthanrath497 3 месяца назад

      👍that is not allowed to show feelings just like armed forces!
      Oppressed to be suppressed!
      😎💯🇨🇦👍

  • @jasonpocklington9217
    @jasonpocklington9217 3 месяца назад +6

    Everyone knows whilst trying to perfect a space craft you must expect snags along the way however the safety of the astronauts is paramount and so I would say allowing starliner to return to earth unmanned will provide important developmental information without putting the astronauts safety at risk.this is a win win scenario for everyone.

  • @StMyles
    @StMyles 3 месяца назад +50

    😂😂😂 The funniest thing about this will be Starliner Astronaunts wearing Starliner suits, coming back on a Space X Dragon.

    • @savagesarethebest7251
      @savagesarethebest7251 3 месяца назад +8

      That would really be a thing to see

    • @StMyles
      @StMyles 3 месяца назад +3

      @@savagesarethebest7251 😂😂😂 Talk about Burn…

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад +3

      😂😂😂

    • @thesurvivalist.
      @thesurvivalist. 3 месяца назад +10

      In a SpaceX Suit. Are Starliner space Suits compatible with SpaceX technology?

    • @CharlesYuditsky
      @CharlesYuditsky 3 месяца назад +2

      How dare they not wear East German border guard boots!

  • @bluedragonkimchi9298
    @bluedragonkimchi9298 3 месяца назад +7

    NASA don’t let Boeing bring your reputation down with theirs. 😢

  • @StabilisingGlobalTemperature
    @StabilisingGlobalTemperature 3 месяца назад +6

    Send it back autonomously.

  • @soctnights
    @soctnights 3 месяца назад +6

    Has the leaks slowed because supply pressure is lower?

  • @jcoghill2
    @jcoghill2 3 месяца назад +5

    I got a bad feeling about this

  • @richardprice8348
    @richardprice8348 3 месяца назад +4

    You are out of date as the return of Starliner has now been delayed indefinitely. The return scheduled for the 26th has been canceled. Spacex should be used to return the astronauts for the sake of the astronauts.

  • @albertross2322
    @albertross2322 3 месяца назад +6

    I really hope those two don't try to save Boeing's (already useless) reputation with their lives! 🙏

  • @ruthlemler2726
    @ruthlemler2726 3 месяца назад +3

    None of this matters right now. The only thing that matters is the safe return of the astronauts.

  • @acornfp5008
    @acornfp5008 3 месяца назад +3

    Small leaks tend to burst if pressures change. Just a thought.

  • @karlnortheast6843
    @karlnortheast6843 3 месяца назад +4

    Hearing all of these flat-toned remarks from Boeing and NASA is hauntingly similar to the build-up of the loss of 14 astronauts.

    • @straunwagner6322
      @straunwagner6322 3 месяца назад

      Exactly what I was thinking. Boeing has shown all they care about is CEOs getting paid, and well, we know who owns the politicians, sonI would not be the least bit surprised if NASA goes ahead and greenlights their return even if they aren’t certain they will survive.

  • @Dino_Hunter_420
    @Dino_Hunter_420 3 месяца назад +5

    Why don’t Boeing pay SpaceX to send a rescue dragon capsule ? And have their module autonomously landed without risk to human fatalities ? Even 10% failure risk is too much to risk it with untested starliner ?

    • @rogerramjet2476
      @rogerramjet2476 3 месяца назад

      US Government needs multiple vendors.

    • @Dino_Hunter_420
      @Dino_Hunter_420 3 месяца назад +1

      @@rogerramjet2476 agree but not paper modules that suffer with more problems than me in my 30s

    • @1974greymalkin
      @1974greymalkin 3 месяца назад

      There is already a Dragon capsule docked up there :)

    • @Dino_Hunter_420
      @Dino_Hunter_420 3 месяца назад

      @@1974greymalkin is that of the other crew? Or for emerigency ?

  • @scottlarson8422
    @scottlarson8422 3 месяца назад +7

    How many hundreds of millions did The American tax payer pay Boeing to bridge the commercial crew gap stating that the extra funds would allow Boeing to launch commercial crews much earlier then SpaceX would be able to do with their Falcon nine and Dragon capsule. So does Boeing have to give that money back to the tax payer since they obviously didn’t meet that obligation?

  • @speedymccreedy8785
    @speedymccreedy8785 3 месяца назад +5

    Everything is fine. The astronauts have copies of Hitchhiker's Guide to Boeing.

  • @ReluctantCriticDude
    @ReluctantCriticDude 3 месяца назад +4

    Seems that there is a light show on re-entry in the works. Hope those astronauts don’t lose their lives due to money.

  • @mattdclarkson
    @mattdclarkson 3 месяца назад +6

    It's a long shot, but I'd love it if Dragon came to the rescue and the government terminated all Boeing contracts. I don't want my tax dollars going to that corrupt, inept company...

  • @garymunro5780
    @garymunro5780 3 месяца назад +4

    Lets hope they get the astronauts back to earth safe and sound. Nothing else matters.

    • @daveozip4326
      @daveozip4326 3 месяца назад

      While it’s true that the most important thing is crew safety, it is not true that nothing else matters. Boeing has shown itself to be incompetent and serious revision of NASAs mid-term plans are required. It’s time to stop shuffling deck chairs on the deck of the titanic and start lowering the lifeboats.

  • @KurtColville
    @KurtColville 3 месяца назад +8

    "In serious stuck"?!? What language is that? You sound like someone perfectly qualified to work at Boeing.

    • @mikegardner107
      @mikegardner107 3 месяца назад

      Written by an AI BOT!

    • @k29king1
      @k29king1 3 месяца назад

      While the voice sounds genuine, its actually an AI bot language model. There’s services on the internet where content creators pay a subscription fee and can use any of the AI bot which were trained by real humans to sound like that human, but can read scripts. So when you hear mistakes like this it means there was an error in the script. Personally Im not against creators using such AI voices as long as g as the content is good, which this channel is ok. Its the fake science channels that use these voices that anger me, because they steal content from other creators and are effectively content farms. Great SpaceX is not a content farm as it doesn’t pump out 10 videos a day of various non-factual crap. The anger people have against AI is understandable but also stupid, because its not going anywhere. Roko’s basilisk man, you should let it know your ok with it, lol.

  • @quivalla
    @quivalla 3 месяца назад +1

    NASA stated a potential return won’t come until after July 2. According to NASA, the crew is not pressed for time to leave the station since there are “plenty of supplies in orbit” and the station’s schedule is “relatively open through mid-August.”

  • @donscheid97
    @donscheid97 3 месяца назад +2

    I can see them in meetings now, wringing their hands together wondering how they're going to get the crew back now without looking worse than they already do.

  • @dkaufman57
    @dkaufman57 3 месяца назад +4

    "The helium leaks have gone down." Is that the same as saying that all the helium is gone?

    • @favesongslist
      @favesongslist 3 месяца назад

      Could it be to less pressure as the helium dissipates?

  • @solarfunction1847
    @solarfunction1847 3 месяца назад +5

    If SpaceX had only one of these problems when it first went to space with astronuts then SpaceX would have been abandoned from continuing any further. It seems that Boeing is favored rather than SpaceX.

  • @jcoghill2
    @jcoghill2 3 месяца назад +4

    Don’t use that thing to fly people back home is unfit for human use.

  • @Glenpollard76
    @Glenpollard76 3 месяца назад +2

    This is the Space version of the Titan-OceanGate!!!!!!

  • @toddmabey1299
    @toddmabey1299 3 месяца назад +3

    I wonder how much Boeing is paying Stich to keep simping for a failed capsule...stop screwing around and send the crew dragon up there and let the Starliner either come back unmanned or just let it burn up

  • @nibotkram7743
    @nibotkram7743 3 месяца назад +5

    1970's engineering being stretched beyond it's capabilities.

    • @pascalkn
      @pascalkn 3 месяца назад

      70's engineering was much better than what they are doing now

  • @peterclarke3020
    @peterclarke3020 3 месяца назад +2

    Well the original idea was to have a primary system (thought to be Boeing) and a backup (chosen to be SpaceX), now we all know how that turned out..
    Thank goodness for the backup choice !
    I also look forward to seeing Dreamchaser !

    • @bradclifton5248
      @bradclifton5248 3 месяца назад +1

      Imagine if dreamchaser had gotten the funding. As is they aren't that far behind.

  • @kusumayogi7956
    @kusumayogi7956 3 месяца назад +6

    Can new bigger starship go to moon in single trip without refueling on orbit?
    Becase 10x refueling is very ridiculous

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад +2

      🤔🤔🤔

    • @slartybarfastb3648
      @slartybarfastb3648 3 месяца назад

      It can go without refueling. It couldn't bring the mission payload with it though.

    • @kusumayogi7956
      @kusumayogi7956 3 месяца назад

      @@slartybarfastb3648 yeahh that is why we need new kind of fuel

    • @slartybarfastb3648
      @slartybarfastb3648 3 месяца назад

      @@kusumayogi7956 There aren't many other options. Nuclear propulsion would really be the only known alternative to the current fuels. It only works well after reaching orbit. Reactors and radioactive fuels are extremely heavy. Mishaps during launch could be fairly bad (though not as bad as the imagination would assume).
      Nuclear propulsion is good for long duration burns, but inefficient for immediate, high acceleration like achieving exit velocity. Chemical rockets are the only currently useful option.

    • @kusumayogi7956
      @kusumayogi7956 3 месяца назад

      @@slartybarfastb3648 i believe the secret for interstellar journey is in hydro carbon bound. We need inventing new kind of gasoline

  • @StMyles
    @StMyles 3 месяца назад +8

    🤨🤨🤨 The Most expensive build by the Goverment.. by the Lowest Bidder…. Space X does it better.

  • @thesurvivalist.
    @thesurvivalist. 3 месяца назад +3

    How much did Starliner cost? And it still not working right. NASA has a problem of not listening when there are problems.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад +1

      Luckily, that is fixed contrast

  • @billevans9231
    @billevans9231 3 месяца назад +6

    They need to send it back empty and have space x bring them back. If they try with astronauts and something goes wrong they should go prison

  • @NinjaKitty91_
    @NinjaKitty91_ 3 месяца назад +3

    Welp, the engineers tried to warn them. Now, they may have to rely on their rival to save their rears. That's what happens when you rush things that shouldn't be rushed.

    • @Marie-Hélène-p3f
      @Marie-Hélène-p3f 3 месяца назад

      Very confusing comments: some complain about taking too long a time to accomplish anything, then someone else comes along and cautions " mustn't rush it".

  • @1974greymalkin
    @1974greymalkin 3 месяца назад +4

    Yea, you couldn't pay me to get back on that pos. SPACEX please save these astronauts. DO NOT GET BACK ON STARLINER. It will kill you.

  • @waichui2988
    @waichui2988 3 месяца назад +5

    What if the astronauts refuse to board the thing?

    • @tbas8741
      @tbas8741 3 месяца назад

      Im sure they would refuse to board the boeing starliner if its got faults.
      No sane Astronaut would refuse to board SpaceX dragon as its by far the best & most advanced space system in human history
      not just the launchers but Dragon Capsule itself is like 100 years ahead of apollo.

    • @toddmabey1299
      @toddmabey1299 3 месяца назад

      I wouldn't get on ANYTHING Boeing has ever made at this point

  • @Dug6666666
    @Dug6666666 3 месяца назад +1

    Here was me thinking it was unreliable, turns out it is just a bit quirky.
    Bit of CRC on the points and clean the plugs and it should be good.

  • @SFSLunar
    @SFSLunar 3 месяца назад +3

    Another W Video ❤🎉

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад +1

      Thanks for your comment. Keep following and discussing on our channel ☺️

  • @trey8737
    @trey8737 3 месяца назад +5

    Boeing shouldn’t be allowed in the space market after all the trouble with their airplanes

  • @Wolf-hd9ke
    @Wolf-hd9ke 3 месяца назад +5

    Face up to it, Boeing. You have built the Studebaker of the Space Race! It was expensive and pretty, but ultimately, a piece of junk.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад

      😐😐😐

    • @davidbrittenham4631
      @davidbrittenham4631 3 месяца назад +2

      Isn't really even very pretty. At launch it looks like a particular male organ, which is appropriate after what it's done to the American taxpayers.

    • @bighoss9705
      @bighoss9705 3 месяца назад +1

      It should be renamed to the StarLeaker!

  • @QuasarCatcher
    @QuasarCatcher 3 месяца назад +6

    Yet again you guys pump out old news and poorly titled video.. stop rushing out videos as your quality is dropping rapidly

    • @Joeysgonerogue
      @Joeysgonerogue 3 месяца назад +1

      Same thought. They want their watch hours. They suck

  • @georgeeagle872
    @georgeeagle872 3 месяца назад +3

    Those two astronauts are the bravest to travel in a Boeing, whatever it may be.😂

  • @dakrontu
    @dakrontu 3 месяца назад +3

    Remember Komarov. The same political pushing is occurring with Starliner as happened with Komarov's fatal flight. This time by the US, not the Russians. Will we ever learn?

  • @Smannellites
    @Smannellites 3 месяца назад +4

    IMO the astronauts should remain on the ISS and Starliner should attempt to return to earth unmanned. It appears that the helium leaks and parachute issues remain unresolved. The astronauts can be brought back on a special Dragon mission.

    • @ravindransomasundaram1810
      @ravindransomasundaram1810 3 месяца назад

      A good suggestion indeed !

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад

      This is the best choice right now

    • @edwardziff3274
      @edwardziff3274 3 месяца назад

      No way I fly back on that piece of shit

    • @edwardziff3274
      @edwardziff3274 3 месяца назад

      I would rather be in a 1970s version of a Russian soyus capsule than use that new piece of garbage from Boeing.

  • @thorenshammer
    @thorenshammer 3 месяца назад +2

    They really have no timeline as to when Starliner will be coming home. More than likely, Starliner will return without the astronauts on board. Dragon will be used as a rescue mission.

  • @barongerhardt
    @barongerhardt 3 месяца назад +4

    I would rather take my chances with starship 5.

  • @seppolindeman7707
    @seppolindeman7707 3 месяца назад

    Thanks for update...

  • @chuckbalogh296
    @chuckbalogh296 3 месяца назад +3

    We all loose without a second private vendor. Boeing will get it done but I would not be in favor or paying Boeing another nickel. It is maybe time to invest in another vendor. There are others.

  • @TheZoltan-42
    @TheZoltan-42 3 месяца назад +2

    Blue Origin produces 2 working engines in 4 years. -> "Don't rush us!"
    SpaceX produces 1 engine per day. -> "Meh! We really need to ramp up things!"

  • @bobperkinson6249
    @bobperkinson6249 3 месяца назад +3

    Boeing is going down hill fast. I am wondering if there dei is in full swing. No! Space X needs to go get them.

  • @savagesarethebest7251
    @savagesarethebest7251 3 месяца назад +2

    I really hopes that they remembered to put bolts in the hatch on the starliner so it doesn't fly away during the reentry.. 🙄

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад

      There are many factors to make a successful re-entry

  • @willeisinga2089
    @willeisinga2089 3 месяца назад +3

    Ask China to save the Astronauts. They know how to do it.

  • @richardwickens2923
    @richardwickens2923 3 месяца назад +1

    Dragon - I don't think anyone wants to risk going back on Starliner - or at the very least they will delay until Dragon is ready in case they need to be rescued. I would not have gone up on Starliner - and that's the easy part. Coming down...

  • @timmccleary8615
    @timmccleary8615 3 месяца назад +6

    5 minutes of new info, and 50 minutes of recycled old daily updates.

    • @AdaminChina666
      @AdaminChina666 3 месяца назад

      That's why I'm unsubbing from this channel.

    • @bradclifton5248
      @bradclifton5248 3 месяца назад

      Never sub to a digital narrator

  • @dand4485
    @dand4485 3 месяца назад +1

    How is it SpaceX has no issues, might suggest if Boeing can't get startliner down they loop the 737 Max team, they have no problem keeping things in the air...
    How is it some startup company like SpaceX simply just steps into the game and gets things work/completed as expected without issues...?

  • @william4292
    @william4292 3 месяца назад

    "Ablative" means that something is designed to be sacrificial - in this case, that it would burn away at some rate, protecting what is underneath. It doesn't make sense to me that an "ablative" heat shield layer would be under the tiles, which are not ablative. If it was truly an ablative layer, it should be on top of the tiles. Being under the tiles, this new layer sounds a lot more like an additional insulating layer to reduce the temperature of the Starship skin. FYI - My background is not specifically in spacecraft design. I was a Strategic Weapons Officer on US Trident submarines and am a life-long sailor. Boats used to use an "ablative" hull coating under the waterline that would protect the hull from marine life damage by slowly wearing away - hence the term "ablative".

  • @raystevens687
    @raystevens687 3 месяца назад

    I like the arms also I like the deck landing but I think if you are using the deck landing I'm wondering if there could be set of arms that would catch the craft if it tries to tip over.

  • @matta5498
    @matta5498 3 месяца назад +1

    Press: How did you detect the helium leaks?
    NASA: We first grew suspicious when the astronauts sounded like munchkins from the Wizard of Oz.

  • @SteveMyers-m7f
    @SteveMyers-m7f 3 месяца назад +2

    Rip Star liner

  • @tomgo4466
    @tomgo4466 3 месяца назад +2

    Of course, best wishes to the crew and shame on Boeing for putting two lives at risk...

  • @snowsong100
    @snowsong100 3 месяца назад +1

    The re-entry is extremely dangerous, because you don't get Second chance and there isn't any bail out.

  • @AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
    @AquarianSoulTimeTraveler 3 месяца назад +1

    The thrusters cannot be deemed as recovered until they have disconnected the module from the ISS and have initiated a full Thruster burn on all thrusters...

  • @ratratrat59
    @ratratrat59 3 месяца назад

    June 25th. What year?

  • @Stetsonhatman
    @Stetsonhatman 3 месяца назад +2

    Boeing: We need another 10B to bring SL back to earth - our bad.

  • @alkimball8920
    @alkimball8920 3 месяца назад +2

    Oh and why does Starliner look like it's built out of redwood bark and paper-mache?

  • @DanielKrennonline
    @DanielKrennonline 3 месяца назад +6

    Fake titles will only work so long and then you loose all credibility and subs... Now on my do not click list!!!

  • @peetbrink4788
    @peetbrink4788 3 месяца назад +1

    Yes. I love the design

  • @user-kn5vp2qq6d
    @user-kn5vp2qq6d 3 месяца назад +1

    If the situation were the other way around, NASA would have canceled the Starship mission months ago, but if they had landed them on the space station anyway, they would have sent Boeing on a rescue mission days ago. If NASA doesn't want to play with the astronauts' lives, it will eventually send a Starship to retrieve both astronauts.

  • @dougtaylor7724
    @dougtaylor7724 3 месяца назад

    Will it be pushed back until it burns up on reentry 35 years from now after its abandoned?

  • @raystevens687
    @raystevens687 3 месяца назад +2

    I doubt that the Star liner will make it back earth with out blowing up. It's a piece of junk and shouldn't of been allowed to even blast off.

  • @richardprice8348
    @richardprice8348 3 месяца назад +1

    They are also having a problem with the space suits.

  • @glencrandall7051
    @glencrandall7051 3 месяца назад +2

    10 minutes of information crammed into 55 minutes.🙂🙂

    • @Boo-tc9eq
      @Boo-tc9eq 3 месяца назад

      😂where are those 10 minutes please?

  • @jroar123
    @jroar123 3 месяца назад +1

    Am I the only one who noticed the crack behind the control panel?

  • @bryanhayes604
    @bryanhayes604 3 месяца назад

    Space X rocks

  • @RoBear-xo6zw
    @RoBear-xo6zw 3 месяца назад +4

    Since, saving face is more important than saving lives… for NASA & Boeing…
    Best case scenario is waiting until the last minute and then fly home on Crew Dragon… and pretend no one notices anything 😂
    It is not possible to repair these leaks, in space… and no knowing what valves will malfunction when or next…😂

  • @thegungadfly8930
    @thegungadfly8930 3 месяца назад +2

    Wow, as a pilot, all this crap would just Fill me with confidence about my ship…

  • @ReggieArford
    @ReggieArford 3 месяца назад

    The appearance of V2 depends on how V1 works landing. They won't risk it until they can land safely on a tower. Or at least run out of V1 ships.

  • @tjkaz5419
    @tjkaz5419 3 месяца назад +1

    "The thrusters have recovered" How? Send that craft back empty .Just in case they unrecover.

  • @shadowcrusader2283
    @shadowcrusader2283 3 месяца назад +1

    Hell with that I'll walk home LMAO

  • @GarySarah-sp5bo
    @GarySarah-sp5bo 3 месяца назад

    Try to fill the gaps in the tiles on the top of the nose of the spaceship to see what happened.

  • @samuraiwarriorsunite
    @samuraiwarriorsunite 3 месяца назад +1

    The sad thing is, the name Boeing used to stand for innovation and excellence, nowadays, not so much. I just hope present and future astronauts come back safe using this equipment.

  • @Wes4Trump
    @Wes4Trump 3 месяца назад +2

    They should make use of the helium leaks by inflating the congratulations balloons for SpaceX on their accomplishments. 😂😂😂

  • @bvf1420
    @bvf1420 3 месяца назад +2

    6:28 Dragon will best starliner

  • @wbwarren57
    @wbwarren57 3 месяца назад +2

    Boeing & NASA certainly are prioritizing their reputations AHEAD of astronaut safety and the ISS mission goals. Clearly, NASA and Boeing delayed the postponement announcement until Friday late (where bad news headlines go to die) so that the bad news of the delay would not overlap with the Boeing CEO's disastrous appearance before Congress. Though Boeing may no longer know how to build good spacecraft or commercial airliners, it certainly has a good PR department! Yay!!!

    • @peterclarke3020
      @peterclarke3020 3 месяца назад +3

      Boeing PR department is the hardest working part of Boeing…

    • @wbwarren57
      @wbwarren57 3 месяца назад

      @@peterclarke3020
      Very true! They have to be. When are they going to receive their well-deserved medals from Putin?

  • @jeffingram8279
    @jeffingram8279 3 месяца назад +2

    Having these astronauts fly home on Starliner is nothing short of grossly irresponsible. it is just not worth the risk of human life. Starliner should just be jettisoned in the deep space.

  • @Joeysgonerogue
    @Joeysgonerogue 3 месяца назад +2

    Why do you republish the same content with misleading titles. It’s a waste of time for regular viewers to have to scan through and search for new info. I guess you want your watch hours more than credibility

  • @trentmiller7532
    @trentmiller7532 3 месяца назад +4

    That’s DEI results for you. Merit based work yields the most efficient and effective results. That’s why Space-X is coming to the rescue

  • @jasonaiken2
    @jasonaiken2 3 месяца назад +2

    Well Boing is having issues with airplanes, with whistleblowers dying, and well spacecraft. I wonder what’s next.

    • @thesurvivalist.
      @thesurvivalist. 3 месяца назад +1

      Hopefully not a bad reentry! Because then both Boeing and NASA will have to face Congress. They will shut down all space missions! Many already want to spend the money elsewhere.

  • @zaffo757
    @zaffo757 3 месяца назад +2

    Good thing we’re paying Boeing so much.

  • @hytruong476
    @hytruong476 3 месяца назад +2

    Good things will be come
    Grateful with God!
    🙏🏾🙏🏾💫💫

  • @dustinperry9980
    @dustinperry9980 3 месяца назад +1

    Space x dragon will launch 1st guarantee cuz that other test vehicle starliner has had nothing but problems since it's start and I'm sure more will arise

  • @texashunter664
    @texashunter664 3 месяца назад +1

    This was the first crewed mission of Starliner and will be the last crewed mission of Starliner. They will go with what works best for them Dragon. If they want to continue with Starliner it will have to be cargo missions and they will have to be flawless, in order to even consider sending back with a crew. Anything shot of this will be irresponsible.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  3 месяца назад

      Yeah, the next one should be the cargo

  • @markaquilina8048
    @markaquilina8048 3 месяца назад

    Question to you techies. Can the starliner come back unmanned now? I know its previous test went up unmanned. The optics of this looks really bad in my opinion. Who thinks that the crew will return via a dragon?

  • @brianflannigans5874
    @brianflannigans5874 3 месяца назад

    hows the bed and breakfast holding up???

  • @Arturo4586
    @Arturo4586 3 месяца назад +1

    The wise approach is to let the starliner return UNMANNED and rescue the astronauts with SpaceX . If the astronauts get injured or worse, the consequences are severe.
    Do not fly if the least doubt exists.

  • @jackdyck2921
    @jackdyck2921 3 месяца назад +2

    Put Strainer on a course the moon and land it there.

  • @peterclarke3020
    @peterclarke3020 3 месяца назад +1

    The ‘Student project Starliner’ suffers yet another mishap.. /s

  • @christophercourter4757
    @christophercourter4757 3 месяца назад +1

    Hilarious that a system given close to half the money is saving Boeing. It's time to move on from the old school space infrastructure companies. Straight throwing money into a pit of fire at this point

  • @joyschtik
    @joyschtik 3 месяца назад +2

    If it’s Boing, It ain’t Going

  • @RodneyLee
    @RodneyLee 3 месяца назад +4

    Boeing should have been shut down years ago