That's a false equivalence. We experience background radiation every day. It's about reducing the density of the material that is mildly radioactive. Otherwise why could we eat bananas, or fly in aeroplanos? It's not black and white.
Check the amount of tritium emitted by nuclear power plants in your own country before speaking. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium#:~:text=CANDU%20reactors%20typically%20produce%20130,electric%20Darlington%20Nuclear%20Generating%20Station. The annual emissions from nuclear power plants in various countries are listed here, and there are many cases where the amount exceeds Japan's yearly limit of 22 trillion becquerels.
Small courtesies to cover up crimes and atrocities. That’s the Japanese culture. They bow to everything with a hidden knife behind their backs. Hell, they even pick up all the trash in the World Cup stadiums last year.
Thirty years later : We have completed the release. We are truly sorry (bows). Fifty years later : This was something done by people in the past, and it has nothing to do with us now. We are also victims (sobbing). 100 years later : Radioactive wastewater? What radioactive wastewater? There was no such thing as radioactive wastewater in history!
Tokyo Electric Power Company admitted that more than 60% of the stored nuclear water radiation exceeded the standard, the reality is likely to be 90%.😢
@@zytrik1Despite china's claims, China will resume buying seafood from china? This was after the stabbing of a Japanese boy by an untra nationalist chinese
Because idiots don’t just believe it when a whole plethora of scientists agree on something, stupid people have inertia and convincing them takes a lot of money, time and energy
If Japan's nuclear-contaminated water is not harmful to the environment, countries like Japan that lack fresh water should not waste this water, because it should be used as drinking water, or to irrigate crops.
@@wildmouse5888 no point correcting CCP bots china they themself sell fake and toxic food item to its own people and the rest of the world and they now want to talk about safety ?, china is a fast growing nuclear power plant user, which is dumping way more treated waste nuclear water in to its own river which FLOW to the ocean. typically CCP
When fish started appear with higher level of radiation than allowed by Jap code Japan just have changed code to higher level. Welcome to the real world of Greenpeace and whole bunch of hypocrites.
quite correct. and not only people will suffer from these thing, the nuclear water. we always say water is where lives come from, and now Japanese are try to kill the earth.
Nuclear wastewater is different from nuclear sewage. Nuclear wastewater is the equivalent of putting Coke with a bottle in the toilet. Nuclear sewage is the equivalent of pouring Coke down the toilet. What the Japanese are dumping is nuclear sewage, and we will drink it one day
@@EmilyLin-vk1cj The water you use in the toilet, just like the water in the power plant, gets purified inside a purification plant and goes back to your valve which you use to drink the water you drink everyday, just like the water being purified and then being dumped in the ocean. I get that your concerned about possible nuclear contamination of the ocean but that's your opinion
Surprisingly BBC is making news about this, instead of staying muted like most western media did when Japan first announced they'd do this. Just imagine it's China who's doing so and how these hypocrites would react lmao.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan. the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago. so it is safe. at least any country do the same thing.
@@Landgraf43 yes, but they refused any third-party's attempt to sample and test the water... so how do we know it is true? when China refused other countries' attempt to inspect Covid-19's origin... everyone distrusts us... and now Japan is basically doing the same... it makes sense that most of the world don't buy it
If you're worried about this, America tested 105 nuclear bombs in the Pacific ocean. Scientifically, the release of Fukushima water is safe as it dilutes into below average background radiation levels. Hold the same energy, because America has done (and doing) much worse
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan. the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago. so it is safe. at least any country do the same thing.
This is Literally a topic five years ago and The US fails to act. Or even acknowledge, but I think it’s planned, someone got paid for not raising it as a concern in the congress, or the parliament in the UK, or the United nation. And the media in the west never broadcasted anything about this up until now when they already released the water. If it was any country instead of Japan, America will act as soon as the opposite open their mouth. Next time when anyone say America is a world keeper, tell them they failed to act when their closes ally in the pacific released and poisoned the whole ocean.
@MarkusPape source? And the case in Japan is that they are discharging radioactive containmenated water which was directly contacted and polluted by the core of nuclear ractor. It is not the water which used the cool the system( so called waste water). Read some books to understand how nuclear ractor works and get your information based on science. Not matter what is your political position or if you are a racist , keep in mind, you are a human ( even I am really not confident to assume you are) as well, you and you families will also be affected by this Japanese crime against humanity.
Don't you know that 4.5 billion tons of uranium is dissolved in the sea? Even if we release infinitely close to 0 nuclear matter, there will be no change from before.
In order to urge the Japanese government to stop the discharge of nuclear wastewater into the ocean, as ordinary people no longer buy Japanese seafood and related products, it is the most powerful and simple counterattack.
"Ocean is big enough to dilute nuclear waste you won't feel the difference." That what they said, until fisherman around the world start fishing 3 eyed fish, 2 headed turtle 🗿
Two years later（Japan） :We have completed the release.We are truly sorry (bows). Twenty years later（Japan） :This was something done by people in the past, and it has nothing to do with us now.We are also victims (sobbing).
There are better things to do to protect the marine ecosystem for example prevent climate change or stop pollution. The amount of tritium that gets released is tiny compared to the amount that already is in the ocean so the effects are negligible. Its not a big deal.
@@jeanslover-m4pDo you know the amount of the tritium emitted by nuclear power plants in your country? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium#Production There are many nuclear power plants around the world that emit more tritium than the 22 trillion becquerels per year limit set by Japan.
Europeans and Americans just kept silent watching millions of cubic of nuclear waste being dumped into the open ocean, because the culprit was Japan, who was their ally. If only countries from the eastern bloc like Russia, China or Southeast Asian countries were disposing of the nuclear waste, western nations would continue to protest, demonstrate, insult, embargo, impose sanctions, and report it to the United Nations like crying babies 🤣🤣
Are you referring to China? In fact, China is very safe with a very low crime rate. As long as you don't break the law, you won't encounter any troubles.
@@letitbecatits already being let into the oceans… they spent millions or billions trying to control the media and opinions of the people with that money they could’ve found another more environmentally safe way of disposing the water
Oh, please. Stop being hysterical. Tritium is natural and produced continuously. Tritium is a naturally occurring radioactive form of hydrogen that is produced in the atmosphere when cosmic rays collide with air molecules.
What Japan is discharging is not nuclear wastewater, but nuclear contaminated water, meaning the kind of wastewater that has been in direct contact with nuclear materials. For political and self-interested reasons, some people have distorted the truth. The Japanese government has invested 70 billion yen for "damage control" regarding international public opinion.
@@dddanw6268 You think he died and Japan covered it up? There were no death records? His family, the hospital staff, and the funeral staff all didn't say anything? The real story is much more boring. He withdrew from politics after losing his 2014 election. He later showed up at a roadshow in 2019 in Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
If the Japanese government claims the water is clean and safe, why don't they keep it for their own use? Drinking or agricultural irrigation. In this matter, it can be seen that Japan is a country without righteousness. Potential danger, should we wait until something actually happens before taking action? Why don't European countries, which have always claimed to protect the environment, publicly condemn Japan on this matter?
guess why: the western countries have done nuclear test in places like the Marshall Islands without any protection for the locak residents, and also many countries have dumped a total of several hundred thousand tons of nuclear waste into the ocean. The western countries' governments agree with the Japanese government's decision because they also did this type of thing themselves.
You think Japan has enough money to bribe ALL western news media? There are millions of them, hardly likely. It's big news in Asia because it's happening next to them, it's far away from the west that's why there is little interest.
@@MarkusPape nonsense. That is normal cooling water which is outside of the reaction chamber. Fukushima is contaminated water which enters into the chamber and contact nuclear material directly.
in Japan, a very lot of people do suicide cause the requirements/challenges are so high, they are actually a very weird, sad country and always were... back in time, it was even more horrendous. the government was always very brutal in Japan. Never different, the rest is just Kawaii and shit. nothing of importance really, but the rest of the world has believed that... all the time. (and ask yourself why there are so many hikkikomoris there.)
"Thank you for your information! However, I've got some confusions about some of the contents in your video. In 'The Water' section, you put an image (3:16) about the operation of the nuclear plant, and I looked into it. There're two types of water in there and I cared which one was releasing out into the environment, and I saw it's the cooling water in the light blue colour. The image also in this section at 4:07 showed how TEPCO cooled down the reactor after the disaster, where water needed to continuously recirculated into the Primary Contaminated Vessel. This made me think that the cooling water normally released into the environment from the nuclear plant is different from the water that TEPCO is releasing, because cooling water does not flow into the Primary Contaminated Vessel, and that makes me think the water released by TEPCO contains much more radio active substances than cooling water. In your video I feel like the nature of these two waters are mixed up, just to confirm whether my understanding is correct? My second confusion is more simple, about you explaining the dilution, actually I think it's quite misleading. So I wonder, if I want to dilute 1L ink and used 1 ton of water, there's less ink in the diluted solution in one litre (1/1001 concentration), but now I have 1L + 1 ton of solution (1001L), even though 1L of this solution is much clearer, but now I have 1001L in total. In case of releasing treated water, it's the same concept, that it's gonna release 1001L in 30 years instead of release 1L concentrated water in 1 year. In your video explaining about dilution, not only it should consider the concentration, but the total amout as well; if the total amout doesn't change, it's just spending more time to release, but not reducing the amount of nuclear active substance nor radio activity. I generally don't support Japan of releasing the water (whether you call it trater water or contaminated water) into the ocean, because there's lack of transparency and shady acts (e.g. create mascot of Tritium; emphasize Tritium but disregard many more substances like C14 and Se137 that would cause more damage in the long run), and bad reputation of TEPCO that partially caused this disaster in the first place (not wanted to spend money to repair nuclear plant and build safety infrastructures). Also, the IAEA report is questionable as well, about its long disclaimer and the number/range of radio active substances tested. I'm really scared that the water released into the ocean is not as safe as TEPCO stated, but could do nothing about it. As a big influencer like you, please be even more cautious on the content you publish... It really does matter... If there's missing information that might mislead audiences, it would be disastrous." I just saw the message from an old opinion about JAPAN nuclear-contaminated water. I agree the view. To get rich ,one cannot do without integrity. To be promoted in rank, one cannot do without kindness 🙏🙏🙏BLESS & PEACE
Japanese governor hold a glass of treated water and made an announcement saying the treated water is drinkable, but when the journalist ask the governor drink the water in front of them, the governor refused.
First of all, it needs to be made clear that what Japan discharges into the sea is nuclear contaminated water, not nuclear wastewater! Nuclear wastewater is the cooling water after the reactor containment shell is cooled, and the whole process does not come into contact with the reactor. The contaminated water discharged by Japan is the water that comes into contact with the reactor after the rupture of the reactor's protective shell, and it is a type of water that contains large amounts of radioactive elements and highly toxic substances. Since the development of nuclear power technology, no nuclear power plant in any country other than Japan has discharged water in direct contact with the reactor.@@MarkusPape
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR!! 😡BOYCOTT JAPAN !! 😡BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳
One of their government member has drank the ‘treated water’ in public water few years ago to prove how ‘safe’ it is. Then from four years ago (maybe?cannot remember the exact year), the government member was disappeared from the medial. We don’t know how’s him doing today😅
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR!! 😡BOYCOTT JAPAN !! 😡BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳
A hot piece of knowledge: Japan has a solution to nuclear sewage, but the cost is too high to be willing to spend money. Cold knowledge: The money spent on dealing with public opinion about the discharge of nuclear sewage has exceeded the money spent on nuclear sewage. Please spread it in the comments
We in China have banned the import of Japanese seafood from today. Hong Kong tightened import controls, and Macau began a complete ban on all Japanese seafood products.
@@happydrawing7309 Radioactive partical in contaminated water will break your DNA, and you will watch your skin drop off from body, no new skin come up, feel the intestine rotten consciously until you die
Not just Asia pacific countries. The affection of the nuclear water will be on all over the world. Western countries like USA, UK, France will also be affected.@@wizardowlgenius7186
This isn't a simple matter. All countries near Japan are greatly concerned. Few people believe in the Japanese government, TEPCO and IAEA. They say it's safe, but there are more experts who say it's very dangerous. Japan releases contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the sea for 30 years, but that is only the period claimed by the Japanese government, and in reality it may take more than 50 years. Until then, no one can guarantee how contaminated water from nuclear power plants will be managed and discharged. And you never know what effect this will have on people. One of the things that surprised me is that this issue is not a big issue in the United States, where it can suffer great damage. This is not a problem that can be solved simply by not eating fish. We should be interested in whether the US can prevent this. Because the coast of the United States is not safe either.
Why? The IAEA said it's okay, Is it the US responsibility to second guess every single decision experts make? I remember when the president said he didn't believe the WHO about where COVID came from god that turned into a s*** show and people accusing the US not believing the science, now suddenly science is wrong and we need to question it? It's up to you what you want to believe, I trust the IAEA enough to not get worried, might stay away from eating too much Japanese sea food but I do respect people are worried, they have every right to be.
before you die and go to see god you need to konw why you die ,man.Japan radioactive nuclear waste water force me learn again chemical and Physics after graduate from shool so many years.I google all nuclear konwledge today.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan. the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago. so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
I hate how everyone has such a negative opinion of nuclear energy because of fearmongering despite the facts saying otherwise… People should listen to science and engineers instead of featmongering, engagement seeking news sites… Residents of Fukushima received less radiation during the accident than normally in a day and not a single person died or has fallen I’ll because of the disaster…
US can stop it, but in order to contain China, they just approved Japan to do it, and US itself will be one of the first 5 countries affected by this release
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan. the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago. so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
Shame on the Japanese government, feel sad for the ocean creatures that live nearby, as well as the people who live on fishing in the neighboring countries of Japan.
Radioactive substances other than tritium contained in the treated water released by the Fukushima nuclear power plant have been reduced through purification to levels that are below the limit that can be detected by machines or to levels that are less than 1/100 of the regulatory standard value. So they do not harm the environment. As for tritium, it is a substance like hydrogen's brother, it is exchanged with hydrogen contained in water molecules and exists as a part of water, so it is very difficult to remove it by chemical methods. On the other hand, tritium is also produced in nature by cosmic rays and is also contained in water vapor in the air, rainwater, seawater, and tap water. Therefore, the amount of tritium emitted by the Fukushima nuclear power plant per year is only about 0.0007% of the tritium present in the Pacific Ocean, and the radiation emitted per liter of treated water is about one-fourth of the radiation emitted by a single human body. Additionally, the beta rays emitted by tritium have low energy, so they can only travel about 5 mm through the air, and can be intercepted with just a piece of paper. Water molecules containing tritium are almost the same as regular water molecules, so they are excreted as water and do not bioaccumulate. These are the reasons why nuclear facilities around the world are releasing tritium into the ocean. In 2021, 82 trillion becquerels of tritium were released into the ocean from the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in the United States, 756 trillion becquerels from the Bruce nuclear power plant in Canada, and 10000 trillion becquerels from the La Hague reprocessing facility in France. This time, the amount of tritium released from the Fukushima nuclear power plant is 22 trillion becquerels. These are just examples; things like this happen all over the world.
@@kar4279 That's incorrect. Some of the water(60%), as admitted by Japan, is above the allowable radioactivity limit. In addition, they are releasing an exorbitant amount of tritium because there is so much liquid. There are other radioactive chemicals that aren't being analyzed in that water. Essentially, it's not meant to be put into the ocean, but Japan will roll the dice to save money.
@@kknn523 What TEPCO has admitted is that approximately 66% of the approximately 1.34 million tons of water in storage, before being released, exceeded the standards(2018). There are two reasons for this. The first is that when ALPS first started operating, its purification performance was inferior to that of today. Second, since a large amount of contaminated water was being generated compared to the current situation, people were working to reduce radiation risks as quickly as possible by focusing on meeting "regulatory standards for on-site storage". And then, in December 2020, TEPCO announced that they were treated again using ALPS, and that nuclides other than tritium were purified to below the "regulatory standards for releasing them into the environment" without any problems.
@@kknn523 As mentioned earlier, the amount of tritium in Fukushima is not so much compared to the amount of tritium that is emitted on a daily basis around the world. These are emissions per year, so if you want to compare their total amounts, just multiply each of those numbers by 30. Radioactive substances other than tritium have also been analyzed in detail. For example, in a report released by the IAEA on May 31, 2023, 83 types of radioactive substances were analyzed and evaluated as safe.
@@kar4279 The standards are meant for normal waste water, not the type of waste water Fukushima has. It's completely experimental. There are other disposable methods.
@@FuckUpJap according to the official claim by the japanese goverment, the water is already safe before going into the ocean. so dilution or not it would be gucci, according to japan...so what are you on about?
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan. the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago. so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
IT IS nuclear contaminated water, which had direct contact with the nuclear waste, but not nuclear wastewater, which had no contact with the nuclear waste and almost no radioactivity. Sadly it seems nobody mentioned that, according to the latest super computer calculation, the current of the ocean will carry the most concentrated contaminated water to the west coast of Canada and the US. Yes, it will reach East Asia, but not as concentrated as the middle of Pacific Ocean and the west coast of North America. Eventually, the nuclear waste will reach all oceans.
@@FuckUpJap Which country are you from? You can ship all these nuclear contaminated water back to your country. The Japanese government must be happy to pay for the shipping.
it‘s sad that JP government ganna use 70 billion japanese yan for media and press to reduce the negative comments all over the world rather than using the money to deal with the waste water of fukushima😥
Do some research for once in your life. The waste water has been treated with the ALPS process which has been independently vetted by the IAEA and multiple independent lab.s
@@theprinceofpieafter i did some study, polluted nuclear water is still exceeding standard limit after alps, that's why it's still polluted nuclear water but not treated water, or why it takes 30 years at least to dump water? why don't just dump it in one year?
@@lvjinbin28 Did you read the IAEA report? It found that the ALPS treated water contained radioactive material other than tritium much less than 1 percent of the regulatory limit. Spreading the release over 30 years helps dilute it more. Ocean currents can be hard to predict, so dumping it all at once might mean some areas are more affected than others.
where do you think Chinese nuclear power plants dump their waste water to? where other countries like France , Russia dump their wastewater to ? I hope you didn't have too much of "poison baby formula" where you were a baby? 🤣🤣
Despite persistent harassment and false rumors by the Chinese government, Japanese people continue to enjoy the delicious fish produced in Fukushima as usual. 🐟🐟🐟
There is definitely a problem with this nuclear wastewater. If it is safe, why not discharge it backwards and pour it directly into the soil around the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan? ?
@@theprinceofpie Why not release directly to Japanese dilution? The earth can live without Japan but cannot live without oceans. The five permanent countries should immediately use nuclear weapons to wipe out the Japanese islands. Humans don’t need this kind of cancer to exist.
This is in effect being discarged into the hydrosphere aka the world's water..Here in the uk if a company releases waste into the rivers it faces criminal charges..this is disgusting.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan. the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago. so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
@@いりた-r3i It’s true that many countries discharge treated nuclear wastewater, but Japan's case draws more attention due to the Fukushima disaster and the historical lack of trust in how Japan has handled its responsibilities. The issue isn't just about the science but also about credibility and accountability. For decades, Japan has avoided fully acknowledging or addressing historical mistakes, from war crimes to environmental disasters like Minamata disease. These unresolved issues create skepticism about whether Japan is acting transparently now. Trust is earned through accountability and openness-not just technical assurances.
@@Blizzard-d4u I basically agree. But it seems like you’re just using it to justify your own biases. The UK, the US, China, South Korea, and all other developed nations have well-known episodes of environmental pollution and how they responded to them. Each of these countries also carries the stigma of military-related controversies. That’s common knowledge, isn’t it? As a Japanese person, I believe Japan’s past war crimes and environmental issues are serious problems. However, bringing those up doesn’t justify your attempt to validate your own biases. it should be based on scientific perspective.
@@いりた-r3i I see your point, and I understand that environmental issues are complex and connected to historical, political, and industrial contexts. I agree that many countries, including developed ones like the UK, US, China, and South Korea, have had significant environmental challenges and have responded to them in various ways. However, my comment was more about the contradiction I often observe: people talk about protecting the environment, but the actions don't always align with the rhetoric. I don't intend to justify any bias, but rather to point out that a global, collective effort is necessary for meaningful change. I also agree that historical events, like Japan’s war crimes or the pollution caused by various countries, are important issues that should be addressed. But my main concern is that environmental protection should be approached scientifically and pragmatically, not as a tool for justifying other agendas. Ultimately, we should focus on solutions, regardless of past mistakes, and work together for the future. What do you think is the most important step forward in terms of environmental policy and action?
Radioactive substances other than tritium contained in the treated water released by the Fukushima nuclear power plant have been reduced through purification to levels that are below the limit that can be detected by machines or to levels that are less than 1/100 of the regulatory standard value. So they do not harm the environment. As for tritium, it is a substance like hydrogen's brother, it is exchanged with hydrogen contained in water molecules and exists as a part of water, so it is very difficult to remove it by chemical methods. On the other hand, tritium is also produced in nature by cosmic rays and is also contained in water vapor in the air, rainwater, seawater, and tap water. Therefore, the amount of tritium emitted by the Fukushima nuclear power plant per year is only about 0.0007% of the tritium present in the Pacific Ocean, and the radiation emitted per liter of treated water is about one-fourth of the radiation emitted by a single human body. In addition, the beta rays emitted by tritium have low energy, so they can only travel about 5 mm through air and 0.005 mm through water, and cannot even pass through a sheet of paper. Water molecules containing tritium are almost the same as regular water molecules, so they are excreted as water and do not bioaccumulate. These are the reasons why nuclear facilities around the world are releasing tritium into the ocean. In 2021, 82 trillion becquerels of tritium were released into the ocean from the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in the United States, 112 trillion becquerels from Yangjiang nuclear power plant in China, 756 trillion becquerels from the Bruce nuclear power plant in Canada, and 10000 trillion becquerels from the La Hague reprocessing facility in France. This time, the amount of tritium released from the Fukushima nuclear power plant is 22 trillion becquerels. These are just examples; things like this happen all over the world.
I’m not surprised that Japan released so-called treated “Safe and Clean” into the ocean. I’m more surprised that BBC reported this negative news about Japan.
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR!! 😡BOYCOTT JAPAN !! 😡BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳
The treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant has already been released into the ocean, but Japanese people continue to eat Fukushima marine fish as usual. 😄🐟🐟🦐 this is true ❢
The treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant has already been released into the ocean, but Japanese people continue to eat Fukushima marine fish as usual. It's true ❢ 🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟
Many countries release way larger amounts of tritium into the ocean. Why aren't you complaining about that? Also there is so much in the ocean already that this doesn't even move the needle. You are just uneducated about the subject.
The Chinese government is simply repeatedly harassing Japan politically. Japanese people continue to enjoy delicious seafood from Fukushima, as usual. 🐟🐟🐟🦐
Japan decided to discharge 22 trillion becquerels of tritium per year for 30 years. This is the discharge of a normal nuclear power plant in Japan. In case you are wondering, the UK power plant discharges 300 trillion becquerels. Tritium is found in rain, rivers, and mineral water, so I think the US and Australia agree. I think the question is whether this standard can really be protected.
@@a7seton562 In a report released by the IAEA on May 31, 2023, the following research institutes conducted data analysis on samples of ALPS treated water collected in the presence of the IAEA. IAEA laboratories: Marine Environmental Research Institute, Terrestrial Environmental Radiochemistry Research Institute, Isotope Hydrology Research Institute Third Party Analyzers: Spiez Institute in Switzerland, Institute of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety in France, Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States, Korea Nuclear Safety Institute in South Korea The report presents a comparison of analytical results and data for 83 types of radioactive materials from each laboratory. Based on that, they decided it was safe.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan. the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago. so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
So wait…we want to “follow the Science” and “listen to the experts” on some things, but here, when the same science and experts say things are safe, everyone denies the science. Bottom line is that we choose to believe what we choose, not what the Science tells us.
Let me expose the sophistry - the countries listed by this person discharge nuclear wastewater, which is not directly in contact with nuclear materials. While Japan's discharge this time is nuclear contaminated water. There was a nuclear leak at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and the nuclear material came into direct contact with seawater. If this nuclear contaminated water is truly purified to safety standards, why do the Japanese need to discharge it into the sea?
What do you want to clarify? Do you know the difference between nuclear wastewater and nuclear sewage? Is Japan discharging nuclear wastewater? This is the essential difference.
We in China have banned the import of Japanese seafood from today. Hong Kong tightened import controls, and Macau began a complete ban on all Japanese seafood products.
If nuclear contaminated water is safe, it does not need to be discharged to the sea, and if it is not safe, it should not be discharged to the sea.
keen intellect
That's a false equivalence. We experience background radiation every day. It's about reducing the density of the material that is mildly radioactive. Otherwise why could we eat bananas, or fly in aeroplanos? It's not black and white.
Check the amount of tritium emitted by nuclear power plants in your own country before speaking.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium#:~:text=CANDU%20reactors%20typically%20produce%20130,electric%20Darlington%20Nuclear%20Generating%20Station.
The annual emissions from nuclear power plants in various countries are listed here, and there are many cases where the amount exceeds Japan's yearly limit of 22 trillion becquerels.
@@horationelson2320less harmful to Japs, harmful to all sea environment and other countries. Fck
@@horationelson2320their are other ways of disposing nuclear waste, this is just one of the cheapest lol
Japan is very considerate when it comes to small courtesies, but lacks shame in matters of great importance.
That is so true
Has US support
Absolutely true !!
@@3214Mastercheese Thanks to the support of the US, the EU and the UN.
Small courtesies to cover up crimes and atrocities. That’s the Japanese culture. They bow to everything with a hidden knife behind their backs. Hell, they even pick up all the trash in the World Cup stadiums last year.
Thirty years later : We have completed the release. We are truly sorry (bows).
Fifty years later : This was something done by people in the past, and it has nothing to do with us now. We are also victims (sobbing).
100 years later : Radioactive wastewater?
What radioactive wastewater? There was no such thing as radioactive wastewater in history!
America, China, Russia, Nazi Germany, and so on
Mark this prediction! History repeats itself
Tokyo Electric Power Company admitted that more than 60% of the stored nuclear water radiation exceeded the standard, the reality is likely to be 90%.😢
the attitude of war criminals
SO japan attitude of WW2
Why do people all over the world pay for the mistakes made by Japan?
I’m pretty sure it was their mistake to stand on the way of a tsunami, why didn’t they just move their whole country?
@@zytrik1Despite china's claims, China will resume buying seafood from china?
This was after the stabbing of a Japanese boy by an untra nationalist chinese
It is not just Pacific Ocean, it is😭😭😭 the Entire Ocean
Eventually 😢
absolutely right. It's a disaster.
The IAEA said the discharges would have a "negligible" impact on the environment.
@@maru-mo5684 we will be the ultimate victim over time. The IAEA stressed it's an option of Japan government, but they don't recommend it.
@@LoYuS_LWhen they say it has a "negligible" impact how can one be a victim?
We should judge everything based on science.
If it's China, what you say and do will be totally different
Correct
If it is China who release those waste water, there will be WW3
China already dumps way more wastewater than Japan is releasing now. And it's nuclear waste.
You and the world just don't give a shit.
China already pollutes the air and the ocean with worse stuff.
nuclear polluted water from Japan is liberal and democratic, that's why West is supportive
Can we interpret this as: Japan is launching a nuclear attack on the world
You could if you'd wanted to. I don't think many people would share that interpretation though.
I am certain that you are a Japanese person
Japan just spent 70 billion on ONLINE PUBLIC RELATIONS to convince their nuclear toxic substance is safe - LOL
Because idiots don’t just believe it when a whole plethora of scientists agree on something, stupid people have inertia and convincing them takes a lot of money, time and energy
Cant be serious
If Japan's nuclear-contaminated water is not harmful to the environment, countries like Japan that lack fresh water should not waste this water, because it should be used as drinking water, or to irrigate crops.
You cannot drink or irrigate crops with salt water.
@@wildmouse5888Sun dried salt
These water are so called “Clean water ”（by Jap. goverment）,according to what they said,these water are clean enough,and not sea water
@@wildmouse5888 no point correcting CCP bots china they themself sell fake and toxic food item to its own people and the rest of the world and they now want to talk about safety ?, china is a fast growing nuclear power plant user, which is dumping way more treated waste nuclear water in to its own river which FLOW to the ocean. typically CCP
You cannot drink or farm with saltwater einstein. Moreover, it IS consumed by the Japanese. They eat the fish caught where the water is discharged.
It's the ocean, not only affect the neighbours but also the whole water system
If the water is so safe ... why doesnt Japan just drink it instead ???
Because It's sea water
Then u go 😂
When fish started appear with higher level of radiation than allowed by Jap code Japan just have changed code to higher level. Welcome to the real world of Greenpeace and whole bunch of hypocrites.
@@Slava_Ukrayini23 I'll go when it's 2041
@@びんづめit's not sea water,it's fresh water,but it's nuclear waste water， it's harmful for human and whole the species
Many people think that this problem is very far away. But sadly nuclear waste water will enter our soil, enter plants, and turn into rain.
quite correct. and not only people will suffer from these thing, the nuclear water. we always say water is where lives come from, and now Japanese are try to kill the earth.
Nuclear wastewater is different from nuclear sewage. Nuclear wastewater is the equivalent of putting Coke with a bottle in the toilet. Nuclear sewage is the equivalent of pouring Coke down the toilet. What the Japanese are dumping is nuclear sewage, and we will drink it one day
@@EmilyLin-vk1cj The water you use in the toilet, just like the water in the power plant, gets purified inside a purification plant and goes back to your valve which you use to drink the water you drink everyday, just like the water being purified and then being dumped in the ocean. I get that your concerned about possible nuclear contamination of the ocean but that's your opinion
@@atadbitunknown
Nuclear pollution cannot be purified like chemical pollution
Surprisingly BBC is making news about this, instead of staying muted like most western media did when Japan first announced they'd do this.
Just imagine it's China who's doing so and how these hypocrites would react lmao.
Or Russia, or Iran
people are already reacting to Chinese media saying they're bitching too much,lol
中国の方がよっぽど汚いのにねw
China already routinely poisons the sea by discharging radioactive wastewater into the open sea. China is shameless to complain.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan.
the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago.
so it is safe. at least any country do the same thing.
How can this allowed to be happen in the world????
Well, the IAEA, which is part of UN, which is controlled by you-know-who, gave the permissions to JP.
Why? Because the effects are negligible since the amount of tritium in the ocean is so large that it doesn't even move the needle.
@@Landgraf43 Don't speak basic science here this is not the place for that. We need outrage from flat earthers
People argue about the little things and choose to be silent when the big things happen.
@@Landgraf43 yes, but they refused any third-party's attempt to sample and test the water...
so how do we know it is true?
when China refused other countries' attempt to inspect Covid-19's origin... everyone distrusts us...
and now Japan is basically doing the same... it makes sense that most of the world don't buy it
A sad day for our ocean😢
Millions of face muzzles are fine too…
I mean due to water cycle, probably not only the ocean😢
If you're worried about this, America tested 105 nuclear bombs in the Pacific ocean. Scientifically, the release of Fukushima water is safe as it dilutes into below average background radiation levels. Hold the same energy, because America has done (and doing) much worse
And sad to Sushi lovers.😢
No sea area will be clean in the future😡
So now thousand tons of dead fish appeared, and they claim it has nothing to do with the "safe treated water"
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan.
the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago.
so it is safe. at least any country do the same thing.
@@いりた-r3i Nuclear wastewater and nuclear sewage are two different things. If you think it's safe, please take it home.
Is this the environmental protection that Japan promotes? The world can live without Japan, but not without oceans
中国人别在这刷负面评论了，自己去国际原子能机构看报告好吗？别上了外网还丢脸
非常合理的质疑
@@davidyu3077日本人别🐶叫好吗？
@@davidyu3077懂不懂核污水和核废水的区别?合格无害的话你去把福岛的核污水全喝了好吧
@@davidyu3077 你别用中文了，你以为你是专家吗？傻逼玩意，舔惯了你主子？
All people of conscience should stand up to protect our ocean, our earth, and our children.
Too late, they got away with it.
This is Literally a topic five years ago and The US fails to act. Or even acknowledge, but I think it’s planned, someone got paid for not raising it as a concern in the congress, or the parliament in the UK, or the United nation.
And the media in the west never broadcasted anything about this up until now when they already released the water.
If it was any country instead of Japan, America will act as soon as the opposite open their mouth.
Next time when anyone say America is a world keeper, tell them they failed to act when their closes ally in the pacific released and poisoned the whole ocean.
@MarkusPape source? And the case in Japan is that they are discharging radioactive containmenated water which was directly contacted and polluted by the core of nuclear ractor. It is not the water which used the cool the system( so called waste water). Read some books to understand how nuclear ractor works and get your information based on science. Not matter what is your political position or if you are a racist , keep in mind, you are a human ( even I am really not confident to assume you are) as well, you and you families will also be affected by this Japanese crime against humanity.
Don't you know that 4.5 billion tons of uranium is dissolved in the sea?
Emitting near-zero pollutants is no different than before.
Don't you know that 4.5 billion tons of uranium is dissolved in the sea?
Even if we release infinitely close to 0 nuclear matter, there will be no change from before.
In order to urge the Japanese government to stop the discharge of nuclear wastewater into the ocean, as ordinary people no longer buy Japanese seafood and related products, it is the most powerful and simple counterattack.
Reject anything from japan include japanese.
But EU decided to import Japanese seafood.. I wonder how EU could do that? All the Sushi Restaurants will suffer, too!
@@Einel-dz9lg You should know EU did not import any japanese seafood. It is more like a political way.
政府へのダメージはなく、漁業関係者が一番困っています。
日本政府は、弱者を切り捨てる名人です。
The Japanese government is the enemy of the people of the world@@maron3008
Much lower standards than other countries
Educated people know better
"Ocean is big enough to dilute nuclear waste you won't feel the difference."
That what they said, until fisherman around the world start fishing 3 eyed fish, 2 headed turtle 🗿
I hope Japanese Government and IAEA don’t fool humankind of the world.
Yes. You can tell the result from the Tokyo Olympic opening ceremony.
And this is too scary, will the next mutation be human?
Japanese government always muddle through the nuclear safe issue, which many of Japanese civilians died for their careless
@@huRickiesmall mutations is what we normally call Cancer! Do the math!
Two years later（Japan） :We have completed the release.We are truly sorry (bows).
Twenty years later（Japan） :This was something done by people in the past, and it has nothing to do with us now.We are also victims (sobbing).
😂😂Yeah
Forty years later: Now we didn't do anything. China did it.
😂
Absolutely true. They like to do this kind of thing.👍🏻
No, it cannot be.
You should respect the IAEA's assessment.
Hope everyone use his or her voice to protect the marine ecosystem! The ocean really needs us now!
There are better things to do to protect the marine ecosystem for example prevent climate change or stop pollution. The amount of tritium that gets released is tiny compared to the amount that already is in the ocean so the effects are negligible. Its not a big deal.
people needs ocean, but ocean does not need people...
The people of the world have no obligation to pay for Japan's evil deeds, destroying the ecosystem for a long time, and finally hurting human beings
@@jeanslover-m4pDo you know the amount of the tritium emitted by nuclear power plants in your country?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium#Production
There are many nuclear power plants around the world that emit more tritium than the 22 trillion becquerels per year limit set by Japan.
Europeans and Americans just kept silent watching millions of cubic of nuclear waste being dumped into the open ocean, because the culprit was Japan, who was their ally.
If only countries from the eastern bloc like Russia, China or Southeast Asian countries were disposing of the nuclear waste, western nations would continue to protest, demonstrate, insult, embargo, impose sanctions, and report it to the United Nations like crying babies 🤣🤣
Japanese: we’re enviro safe. Japanese:
Imagine if it was an unpopular country releasing the water.
It becomes an unpopular country right now!
Japan have never been popular country
Are you referring to China?
In fact, China is very safe with a very low crime rate. As long as you don't break the law, you won't encounter any troubles.
@@simondu7908what about freedom of speech, Peng Zaizhou didn't break the law, where is he?
Imagine the massive crying from the US and its allies if it was China or Russia releasing this 😂
If the water is so safe, why not use for agriculture or something else instead of dumping into ocean?
Cinobot
Because the water is not safe. That’s why we should stop the release as soon as possible.
@@letitbecatits already being let into the oceans… they spent millions or billions trying to control the media and opinions of the people with that money they could’ve found another more environmentally safe way of disposing the water
@@letitbecathow?
How do you use seawater for agriculture? Did you read the article?
Unbelievable such a crime would be committed.
There is no such agreement in international law (laughs)
USA and IAEA indulge japan crime.
What do you expect from the Japanese? Pikachu power?!?!?!?
You've never experienced a terrifying earthquake or tsunami, so you can easily say that.
Oh, please. Stop being hysterical. Tritium is natural and produced continuously. Tritium is a naturally occurring radioactive form of hydrogen that is produced in the atmosphere when cosmic rays collide with air molecules.
What Japan is discharging is not nuclear wastewater, but nuclear contaminated water, meaning the kind of wastewater that has been in direct contact with nuclear materials. For political and self-interested reasons, some people have distorted the truth. The Japanese government has invested 70 billion yen for "damage control" regarding international public opinion.
Shame on them!
they have no shame! Look at what they did to Asians during WWII and look at their shameless reaction now. Same behaviour, only at different times.
英語で世論戦仕掛けても無駄だよ！中国人は中国語でコメントしてください。
批判コメントの大半のアカウント調べたら中国人ですねw😂
@@LonglivetheBritishEmpire-i7uWhy do you have to say it in your native language?
It's a BBC comment section, so shouldn't it be said in English?
To be honest if the every Japanese person drank a cup of nuclear water they don’t have to pour it all to the sea :)
A Japanese MP drank the waste water but people would rather be outraged.
@@theprinceofpieand he vanished 4 years later
@@dddanw6268 You think he died and Japan covered it up? There were no death records? His family, the hospital staff, and the funeral staff all didn't say anything?
The real story is much more boring. He withdrew from politics after losing his 2014 election. He later showed up at a roadshow in 2019 in Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
It'll still end up in the sea after they drink it in a day or 2.
You think that water we drink doesn't end up in the sea eventually? 😂
Shame on them...
Whats the solution
@@mchannel1365 use it for base platform for next ‘vaccine’..
@@mchannel1365 The Japanese and their supporters can drink this "harmless" water, it's simple.
Nvm. You know this is their essence.
nuke@@mchannel1365
If the Japanese government claims the water is clean and safe, why don't they keep it for their own use? Drinking or agricultural irrigation. In this matter, it can be seen that Japan is a country without righteousness. Potential danger, should we wait until something actually happens before taking action? Why don't European countries, which have always claimed to protect the environment, publicly condemn Japan on this matter?
The western media’s lack of coverage of Japan’s actions is appalling! Clearly Japan has spent a lot money on putting a positive spin on this.
guess why: the western countries have done nuclear test in places like the Marshall Islands without any protection for the locak residents, and also many countries have dumped a total of several hundred thousand tons of nuclear waste into the ocean. The western countries' governments agree with the Japanese government's decision because they also did this type of thing themselves.
You think Japan has enough money to bribe ALL western news media? There are millions of them, hardly likely. It's big news in Asia because it's happening next to them, it's far away from the west that's why there is little interest.
Agree! In Germany no one reports this and like no one care
@@MarkusPapewhere is the ref from ?
@@MarkusPape nonsense. That is normal cooling water which is outside of the reaction chamber. Fukushima is contaminated water which enters into the chamber and contact nuclear material directly.
True colours of the japanese govt
in Japan, a very lot of people do suicide cause the requirements/challenges are so high, they are actually a very weird, sad country and always were... back in time, it was even more horrendous. the government was always very brutal in Japan. Never different, the rest is just Kawaii and shit. nothing of importance really, but the rest of the world has believed that... all the time. (and ask yourself why there are so many hikkikomoris there.)
Japanese : We've been suffering for radiation For a long time, Now all you guys get a taste of it😂
It's not funny. STOP
Sharing is caring after all.
@@마시멜로냥-x8g 我觉得非常好笑，哈哈
"Thank you for your information! However, I've got some confusions about some of the contents in your video. In 'The Water' section, you put an image (3:16) about the operation of the nuclear plant, and I looked into it. There're two types of water in there and I cared which one was releasing out into the environment, and I saw it's the cooling water in the light blue colour. The image also in this section at 4:07 showed how TEPCO cooled down the reactor after the disaster, where water needed to continuously recirculated into the Primary Contaminated Vessel. This made me think that the cooling water normally released into the environment from the nuclear plant is different from the water that TEPCO is releasing, because cooling water does not flow into the Primary Contaminated Vessel, and that makes me think the water released by TEPCO contains much more radio active substances than cooling water. In your video I feel like the nature of these two waters are mixed up, just to confirm whether my understanding is correct?
My second confusion is more simple, about you explaining the dilution, actually I think it's quite misleading. So I wonder, if I want to dilute 1L ink and used 1 ton of water, there's less ink in the diluted solution in one litre (1/1001 concentration), but now I have 1L + 1 ton of solution (1001L), even though 1L of this solution is much clearer, but now I have 1001L in total. In case of releasing treated water, it's the same concept, that it's gonna release 1001L in 30 years instead of release 1L concentrated water in 1 year. In your video explaining about dilution, not only it should consider the concentration, but the total amout as well; if the total amout doesn't change, it's just spending more time to release, but not reducing the amount of nuclear active substance nor radio activity.
I generally don't support Japan of releasing the water (whether you call it trater water or contaminated water) into the ocean, because there's lack of transparency and shady acts (e.g. create mascot of Tritium; emphasize Tritium but disregard many more substances like C14 and Se137 that would cause more damage in the long run), and bad reputation of TEPCO that partially caused this disaster in the first place (not wanted to spend money to repair nuclear plant and build safety infrastructures). Also, the IAEA report is questionable as well, about its long disclaimer and the number/range of radio active substances tested. I'm really scared that the water released into the ocean is not as safe as TEPCO stated, but could do nothing about it. As a big influencer like you, please be even more cautious on the content you publish... It really does matter... If there's missing information that might mislead audiences, it would be disastrous."
I just saw the message from an old opinion about JAPAN nuclear-contaminated water.
I agree the view.
To get rich ,one cannot do without integrity.
To be promoted in rank, one cannot do without kindness
🙏🙏🙏BLESS & PEACE
Japanese governor hold a glass of treated water and made an announcement saying the treated water is drinkable, but when the journalist ask the governor drink the water in front of them, the governor refused.
There are stupid people here who don't know the concept of dilution.
@@MarkusPape Please become a responsible nation instead of resorting to sophistry.
First of all, it needs to be made clear that what Japan discharges into the sea is nuclear contaminated water, not nuclear wastewater! Nuclear wastewater is the cooling water after the reactor containment shell is cooled, and the whole process does not come into contact with the reactor. The contaminated water discharged by Japan is the water that comes into contact with the reactor after the rupture of the reactor's protective shell, and it is a type of water that contains large amounts of radioactive elements and highly toxic substances. Since the development of nuclear power technology, no nuclear power plant in any country other than Japan has discharged water in direct contact with the reactor.@@MarkusPape
Facts, not sophistry
@@MarkusPapeshow us your evidence
I believe that in 30 years the giant creatures in the ocean will be transformed into Godzilla by nuclear waste water
HUMANITY IS DESTROYING THIS PLANET!!!!!!!
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR!! 😡BOYCOTT JAPAN !! 😡BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳
No, its selfishness
You are online using RUclips. You are emitting carbon now. Get lost from here and save the world.
no, its Japanese.
Human beings do not have the ability to destroy the earth, but destroy themselves.
Look at global tritium emissions.😂😂😂
Significant day for the world
They are still trying to convince its people and its neighbour this is "safe"😡
Why don't they just drink the water for themselves?
One of their government member has drank the ‘treated water’ in public water few years ago to prove how ‘safe’ it is. Then from four years ago (maybe?cannot remember the exact year), the government member was disappeared from the medial. We don’t know how’s him doing today😅
It’s ‘safe and effective’ , trust the science…..😂
@@itsme-gw2flhe's gone
That may creats a new Recident Evil😂
Yes, they should drink it themselves😡
You would think the Japanese would know what happens when you do this.
Godzilla.
Aka “ leviathan “
Mierlurks Fallout 4
@@manuelrodriguez2637LOL
They're trying to summon Godzilla :)
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR!! 😡BOYCOTT JAPAN !! 😡BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳
The Japanese government should have a drink to prove it's harmless.
It doesn’t matter weather the government drink it or not. It will probably be fake.
Already happened. Poor lad got promoted in Japan and voluntarily stepped down for health reasons.
@@liangjiang3122😂😂😂
Would you drink the industral wastes? The standard for releasing and drinking is comletely different.
@@jude3288 Have any other countries released nuclear wastes into the sea?😂
A hot piece of knowledge: Japan has a solution to nuclear sewage, but the cost is too high to be willing to spend money.
Cold knowledge: The money spent on dealing with public opinion about the discharge of nuclear sewage has exceeded the money spent on nuclear sewage. Please spread it in the comments
No!
People in this comment section are somehow blind to the amount of tritium their country releases every year😊
Its not a competition
@@montega. of course, but without considering their own country, they don’t deserve to criticize other countries🐥
I don't know why people always say they want to protect the environment but never stop destroying it.
We in China have banned the import of Japanese seafood from today. Hong Kong tightened import controls, and Macau began a complete ban on all Japanese seafood products.
well said
These contaminated water could flow to neighboring countries like Korea and China. Sea products from these countries must also be banned.
@@happydrawing7309 Radioactive partical in contaminated water will break your DNA, and you will watch your skin drop off from body, no new skin come up, feel the intestine rotten consciously until you die
@@wizardowlgenius7186 😰😰Ocean currents will carry nuclear waste around the world
Not just Asia pacific countries. The affection of the nuclear water will be on all over the world. Western countries like USA, UK, France will also be affected.@@wizardowlgenius7186
This isn't a simple matter. All countries near Japan are greatly concerned. Few people believe in the Japanese government, TEPCO and IAEA. They say it's safe, but there are more experts who say it's very dangerous. Japan releases contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the sea for 30 years, but that is only the period claimed by the Japanese government, and in reality it may take more than 50 years. Until then, no one can guarantee how contaminated water from nuclear power plants will be managed and discharged. And you never know what effect this will have on people.
One of the things that surprised me is that this issue is not a big issue in the United States, where it can suffer great damage. This is not a problem that can be solved simply by not eating fish. We should be interested in whether the US can prevent this. Because the coast of the United States is not safe either.
懸念を示しているのは、中国と韓国と北朝鮮だけ
フィリピンでも反対デモはあったけど、フィリピン人を利用して在住している中国人と南北朝鮮人がやらせてるデモだ
日本国内であった反対デモも在日人や共産党員に集められたアルバイトの年寄りだ
他国の人間まで利用してデモしない方がいいよ
日本の反日デモ参加者なんて、アルバイト代の他に弁当と飲み物付きだからな
Why? The IAEA said it's okay, Is it the US responsibility to second guess every single decision experts make? I remember when the president said he didn't believe the WHO about where COVID came from god that turned into a s*** show and people accusing the US not believing the science, now suddenly science is wrong and we need to question it? It's up to you what you want to believe, I trust the IAEA enough to not get worried, might stay away from eating too much Japanese sea food but I do respect people are worried, they have every right to be.
they have alway lie, they have even irgnored and lied the II war world cram in Asia!!!
Marshall islands, concrete dome. THAT is our issue,not some treated water.
dont think we aint effected that water travel to ENTIRE PLANET ur KIDS BE EATING FISH FROM THAT WATER TOO AAGHAHA
I like how everyone suddenly has PhD in Nuclear Physics and Biology 😅😅
Typical wokes consider themselves experts in everything.
Welcome to the Internet buddy.
before you die and go to see god you need to konw why you die ,man.Japan radioactive nuclear waste water force me learn again chemical and Physics after graduate from shool so many years.I google all nuclear konwledge today.
This is the most harmful solution, but the cheapest
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan.
the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago.
so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
I hate how everyone has such a negative opinion of nuclear energy because of fearmongering despite the facts saying otherwise…
People should listen to science and engineers instead of featmongering, engagement seeking news sites… Residents of Fukushima received less radiation during the accident than normally in a day and not a single person died or has fallen I’ll because of the disaster…
No one can stop this crime😢
US can stop it, but in order to contain China, they just approved Japan to do it, and US itself will be one of the first 5 countries affected by this release
REVELATION 16:3 coming soon
@@MarkusPapeBot. How much are you getting paid for the same exact comment? Keep working for those pennies pal.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan.
the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago.
so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
Those who said it is safe should drink the water first.
It's even safer to release into the ocean.
You drink saltwater?
@@Landgraf43swim there nakedly
Shame on the Japanese government, feel sad for the ocean creatures that live nearby, as well as the people who live on fishing in the neighboring countries of Japan.
Radioactive substances other than tritium contained in the treated water released by the Fukushima nuclear power plant have been reduced through purification to levels that are below the limit that can be detected by machines or to levels that are less than 1/100 of the regulatory standard value. So they do not harm the environment. As for tritium, it is a substance like hydrogen's brother, it is exchanged with hydrogen contained in water molecules and exists as a part of water, so it is very difficult to remove it by chemical methods. On the other hand, tritium is also produced in nature by cosmic rays and is also contained in water vapor in the air, rainwater, seawater, and tap water. Therefore, the amount of tritium emitted by the Fukushima nuclear power plant per year is only about 0.0007% of the tritium present in the Pacific Ocean, and the radiation emitted per liter of treated water is about one-fourth of the radiation emitted by a single human body. Additionally, the beta rays emitted by tritium have low energy, so they can only travel about 5 mm through the air, and can be intercepted with just a piece of paper. Water molecules containing tritium are almost the same as regular water molecules, so they are excreted as water and do not bioaccumulate. These are the reasons why nuclear facilities around the world are releasing tritium into the ocean. In 2021, 82 trillion becquerels of tritium were released into the ocean from the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in the United States, 756 trillion becquerels from the Bruce nuclear power plant in Canada, and 10000 trillion becquerels from the La Hague reprocessing facility in France. This time, the amount of tritium released from the Fukushima nuclear power plant is 22 trillion becquerels. These are just examples; things like this happen all over the world.
@@kar4279 That's incorrect. Some of the water(60%), as admitted by Japan, is above the allowable radioactivity limit. In addition, they are releasing an exorbitant amount of tritium because there is so much liquid. There are other radioactive chemicals that aren't being analyzed in that water. Essentially, it's not meant to be put into the ocean, but Japan will roll the dice to save money.
@@kknn523 What TEPCO has admitted is that approximately 66% of the approximately 1.34 million tons of water in storage, before being released, exceeded the standards(2018). There are two reasons for this. The first is that when ALPS first started operating, its purification performance was inferior to that of today. Second, since a large amount of contaminated water was being generated compared to the current situation, people were working to reduce radiation risks as quickly as possible by focusing on meeting "regulatory standards for on-site storage". And then, in December 2020, TEPCO announced that they were treated again using ALPS, and that nuclides other than tritium were purified to below the "regulatory standards for releasing them into the environment" without any problems.
@@kknn523 As mentioned earlier, the amount of tritium in Fukushima is not so much compared to the amount of tritium that is emitted on a daily basis around the world. These are emissions per year, so if you want to compare their total amounts, just multiply each of those numbers by 30. Radioactive substances other than tritium have also been analyzed in detail. For example, in a report released by the IAEA on May 31, 2023, 83 types of radioactive substances were analyzed and evaluated as safe.
@@kar4279 The standards are meant for normal waste water, not the type of waste water Fukushima has. It's completely experimental. There are other disposable methods.
If the water is so safe they should connect it to the national grid and let Japanese households use the really safe water.
It's safe diluted, that's why they put it into the ocean, it's not safe concentrated.
There's one stupid kid here who doesn't know the concept of dilution (laughs)
@@FuckUpJap according to the official claim by the japanese goverment, the water is already safe before going into the ocean. so dilution or not it would be gucci, according to japan...so what are you on about?
It's seawater. If you run it through water pipes, it will rust, and if you spread it on the ground, it will cause salt damage.
イギリスは423兆ベクレルも海に放出してるよ
Just to save money. Japan never changed after ww2.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan.
the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago.
so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
@@いりた-r3i Source = trust me bro.
Bullshit, your own country is shameless, don't involve other countries, Japan should be
The earth can live without Japan, but not without the ocean.
Radioactive contaminated water is not nuclear reactors waste water.
Its being treated to waste water you fool
The chinise “Oppose the release of nuclear material removal water” = “Give us a semiconductor manufacturing machine”. Very Simple political card.
Scientists: safe
low IQ people:it’s not safe😭😭😭
I wish more people would listen to science
That's not science, just political propaganda
@@cseong74 Trust the science.
IT IS nuclear contaminated water, which had direct contact with the nuclear waste, but not nuclear wastewater, which had no contact with the nuclear waste and almost no radioactivity. Sadly it seems nobody mentioned that, according to the latest super computer calculation, the current of the ocean will carry the most concentrated contaminated water to the west coast of Canada and the US. Yes, it will reach East Asia, but not as concentrated as the middle of Pacific Ocean and the west coast of North America. Eventually, the nuclear waste will reach all oceans.
The amount of tritium in that water is miniscule to the amount already in the ocean naturally. It doesn't even make a difference. Stop fearmongering.
Can you see carbon dioxide in the room? that's so amazing please be proud LOL
@@FuckUpJap Which country are you from? You can ship all these nuclear contaminated water back to your country. The Japanese government must be happy to pay for the shipping.
Fukushima 0.19msv/hr
Normal waste dump:0.01msv/hr
No excuse for any righteous person to defend Jap for such terrible and damaging actions to our one and only Earth. Go to hell for those who do.
Please be advised that's not nuclear waste water, but nuclear polluted water with direct contact to the broken reactor core.
it‘s sad that JP government ganna use 70 billion japanese yan for media and press to reduce the negative comments all over the world rather than using the money to deal with the waste water of fukushima😥
they success
Do some research for once in your life. The waste water has been treated with the ALPS process which has been independently vetted by the IAEA and multiple independent lab.s
@@theprinceofpieafter i did some study, polluted nuclear water is still exceeding standard limit after alps, that's why it's still polluted nuclear water but not treated water, or why it takes 30 years at least to dump water? why don't just dump it in one year?
@@lvjinbin28 Did you read the IAEA report? It found that the ALPS treated water contained radioactive material other than tritium much less than 1 percent of the regulatory limit.
Spreading the release over 30 years helps dilute it more. Ocean currents can be hard to predict, so dumping it all at once might mean some areas are more affected than others.
The Japanese government is really shameful, Japan should compensate fishery practitioners in all countries in the world
Since the Japanese government says the waste water is safe, you can use it in hot springs and tea. Why discharge it into the Pacific Ocean?
You think that doing this wouldn't end up with it in the ocean eventually? 😂 Also do you put salt water in your tea?
where do you think Chinese nuclear power plants dump their waste water to? where other countries like France , Russia dump their wastewater to ? I hope you didn't have too much of "poison baby formula" where you were a baby? 🤣🤣
Japan is very excessive, the ocean is everyone's! Boycott Japanese goods!@@Landgraf43
@@silk-moon你连核废水跟核污染水都分不清
@@Landgraf43哪都有你本来不想理你，sb你怎么不去把水都喝了？要处理掉盐很难么？
if it’s safe enough,why they pour into sea , not to their unground water.
For the cost is different.
So ground water doesn't end up in the sea eventually? 😂
Basically this country is a colonial country, Japan is a cruel country
Not colonial, their social environment makes them born to be Nazis
Despite persistent harassment and false rumors by the Chinese government, Japanese people continue to enjoy the delicious fish produced in Fukushima as usual. 🐟🐟🐟
lol you should live in fukushima water
There is definitely a problem with this nuclear wastewater. If it is safe, why not discharge it backwards and pour it directly into the soil around the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan? ?
Dilution across an entire ocean makes it safe.
@@theprinceofpieBut the total amount is the same, those elements will maintain thousands of years
@@theprinceofpie Why not release directly to Japanese dilution? The earth can live without Japan but cannot live without oceans. The five permanent countries should immediately use nuclear weapons to wipe out the Japanese islands. Humans don’t need this kind of cancer to exist.
中国人はわざわざ英語を使わないでください。私はコメントの大半が中国人だと知っています。
@@LonglivetheBritishEmpire-i7u nmsl
世界は日本なしではできるが、海なしではだめだ
😢
真的想要把无辜的日本人接到中国了……
Come to live in China, our Japanese friends.😊
日本語を使うなks
Has japan's government learnt nothing from Shin Godzilla?
Don't put the water into the sea. Put it in their drinking water if it's that 'safe' hahaha
So you think drinking water doesn't end up in the sea? 😂
This is in effect being discarged into the hydrosphere aka the world's water..Here in the uk if a company releases waste into the rivers it faces criminal charges..this is disgusting.
あなたの国のヘイシャムB原発から390兆ベクレルも排出しているようですね。
tritium （Bq）
Japan 1500
WHO water 10000
UK 39000000000
it's radioactive contaminated water not just "wastewater"...
They want to make godzilla a reality
Everyone in the world should have to vote for such decisions
That's not how the world works, there are many nations not one nation ruling all.
Including stupid people who don't know science (laughs)
Stupid people get to vote in elections sooo yeah
Voting would not work when the system is manipulated, especially by the few elites
Japan being the same Japan from WW2...even as a weeb I'm not surprised.
People from all around the world should know this.
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan.
the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago.
so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
@@いりた-r3i It’s true that many countries discharge treated nuclear wastewater, but Japan's case draws more attention due to the Fukushima disaster and the historical lack of trust in how Japan has handled its responsibilities. The issue isn't just about the science but also about credibility and accountability. For decades, Japan has avoided fully acknowledging or addressing historical mistakes, from war crimes to environmental disasters like Minamata disease. These unresolved issues create skepticism about whether Japan is acting transparently now. Trust is earned through accountability and openness-not just technical assurances.
@@Blizzard-d4u I basically agree.
But it seems like you’re just using it to justify your own biases.
The UK, the US, China, South Korea, and all other developed nations have well-known episodes of environmental pollution and how they responded to them. Each of these countries also carries the stigma of military-related controversies. That’s common knowledge, isn’t it?
As a Japanese person, I believe Japan’s past war crimes and environmental issues are serious problems.
However, bringing those up doesn’t justify your attempt to validate your own biases.
it should be based on scientific perspective.
@@いりた-r3i I see your point, and I understand that environmental issues are complex and connected to historical, political, and industrial contexts. I agree that many countries, including developed ones like the UK, US, China, and South Korea, have had significant environmental challenges and have responded to them in various ways. However, my comment was more about the contradiction I often observe: people talk about protecting the environment, but the actions don't always align with the rhetoric. I don't intend to justify any bias, but rather to point out that a global, collective effort is necessary for meaningful change.
I also agree that historical events, like Japan’s war crimes or the pollution caused by various countries, are important issues that should be addressed. But my main concern is that environmental protection should be approached scientifically and pragmatically, not as a tool for justifying other agendas. Ultimately, we should focus on solutions, regardless of past mistakes, and work together for the future. What do you think is the most important step forward in terms of environmental policy and action?
@@いりた-r3i I admire you and wish you good luck😘
Radioactive substances other than tritium contained in the treated water released by the Fukushima nuclear power plant have been reduced through purification to levels that are below the limit that can be detected by machines or to levels that are less than 1/100 of the regulatory standard value. So they do not harm the environment. As for tritium, it is a substance like hydrogen's brother, it is exchanged with hydrogen contained in water molecules and exists as a part of water, so it is very difficult to remove it by chemical methods. On the other hand, tritium is also produced in nature by cosmic rays and is also contained in water vapor in the air, rainwater, seawater, and tap water. Therefore, the amount of tritium emitted by the Fukushima nuclear power plant per year is only about 0.0007% of the tritium present in the Pacific Ocean, and the radiation emitted per liter of treated water is about one-fourth of the radiation emitted by a single human body. In addition, the beta rays emitted by tritium have low energy, so they can only travel about 5 mm through air and 0.005 mm through water, and cannot even pass through a sheet of paper. Water molecules containing tritium are almost the same as regular water molecules, so they are excreted as water and do not bioaccumulate. These are the reasons why nuclear facilities around the world are releasing tritium into the ocean. In 2021, 82 trillion becquerels of tritium were released into the ocean from the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in the United States, 112 trillion becquerels from Yangjiang nuclear power plant in China, 756 trillion becquerels from the Bruce nuclear power plant in Canada, and 10000 trillion becquerels from the La Hague reprocessing facility in France. This time, the amount of tritium released from the Fukushima nuclear power plant is 22 trillion becquerels. These are just examples; things like this happen all over the world.
I think the fishermen and fish shops will suffer the most in both Japan and China. The ocean and environment overall should be fine.
草你妈了个逼，我日你妈，真以为你们这群废物国家很安全，骂逼得到时候下雨到处核污染，死了你祖宗十八代的时候就不这么想了，好好看看中国清华大学的模拟再逼逼赖赖
Yep it's mostly about reputational damage which will result in economical losses, the ocean and the environment won't change much.
Surrounding countries will be affected
@@zjeeeYou ignore the effect of biological enrichment.When the big fish eat small fish, the pollutants will double rather than decrease.
The water has been treated. It is the safest way to be released to the Pacific. There is no other safer option.
China as usual, everything it does or says is for political purposes just like it fabricated the so-called "Rape of Nanjing".
Never believe.
I’m not surprised that Japan released so-called treated “Safe and Clean” into the ocean. I’m more surprised that BBC reported this negative news about Japan.
2:16 They say "very safe" while wearing thick nuclear suits.
😮 the ocean temperature is at record highs... interesting timing
WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR!! 😡BOYCOTT JAPAN !! 😡BUT THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳
judgement day is coming very soon
Japan has set the worst example, and no country dares to do so
Uh no. Many countries release tritium water
あなた中国人ですよね？英語でコメントしても無駄です。
It is not conterminated water.
It is treated water.
The treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant has already been released into the ocean, but Japanese people continue to eat Fukushima marine fish as usual. 😄🐟🐟🦐 this is true ❢
If its that safe, they should release it on their OWN soil, NOT in the ocean. Shame on Japanese government for doing such a horrendous act!!
The treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant has already been released into the ocean, but Japanese people continue to eat Fukushima marine fish as usual. It's true ❢ 🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟
Anybody understand why Kishida is doing this? This is terror to the ocean safety globally. Nobody own the ocean, it moves all over the planet.
Because it's proven safe. It's only China and Korea against this.
Because Japan‘s father, US, say Yes, do it!
Because it will dissipate in a large volume of water. It's like peeing in a pool, but a way larger pool.
this is the cheapest way
Many countries release way larger amounts of tritium into the ocean. Why aren't you complaining about that? Also there is so much in the ocean already that this doesn't even move the needle. You are just uneducated about the subject.
The Chinese government is simply repeatedly harassing Japan politically. Japanese people continue to enjoy delicious seafood from Fukushima, as usual. 🐟🐟🐟🦐
Japan decided to discharge 22 trillion becquerels of tritium per year for 30 years. This is the discharge of a normal nuclear power plant in Japan.
In case you are wondering, the UK power plant discharges 300 trillion becquerels.
Tritium is found in rain, rivers, and mineral water, so I think the US and Australia agree.
I think the question is whether this standard can really be protected.
If you focus on tritium alone, you have fallen to their propaganda.
@@a7seton562 In a report released by the IAEA on May 31, 2023, the following research institutes conducted data analysis on samples of ALPS treated water collected in the presence of the IAEA.
IAEA laboratories: Marine Environmental Research Institute, Terrestrial Environmental Radiochemistry Research Institute, Isotope Hydrology Research Institute
Third Party Analyzers: Spiez Institute in Switzerland, Institute of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety in France, Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States, Korea Nuclear Safety Institute in South Korea
The report presents a comparison of analytical results and data for 83 types of radioactive materials from each laboratory. Based on that, they decided it was safe.
If it is safe, why do they keep them in Japan and drink them.
Do you drink sea water?
@@Skyhind xzgqcool4397 : yes
@@Skyhinddare you swim in the treated water? I meant everyday, free entrance free
@@Skyhind, Have you ever swum in the sea?
All countries (USA, France, China, Korea, etc.) which use nuclear power are discharging contaminated water as well as Japan.
the reason why it's got all this attention is simply because of the reputational damage caused by the accident 10 years ago.
so it is safe. at least every country do the same thing.
Pretty sure this is the same way godzilla started 😂
What part of “it’s safe” do people seem to not understand? 🤔
So wait…we want to “follow the Science” and “listen to the experts” on some things, but here, when the same science and experts say things are safe, everyone denies the science. Bottom line is that we choose to believe what we choose, not what the Science tells us.
The question is: if it is so safe, why Japanese do not release to their inner rivers?
Even Japanese people stay against. They are losing business,too.
@@wujilong3690don’t you know where a river goes to? To the ocean!
Can you elaborate on what science you mean when you say it's the same science?
Yes but no, it firstly goes to water factory for people drinking.@@kendamachan
How about mentioning they are going to do this for 30 years? Less people think this will be over and done with in days.
People will forget about it in days and go back to life as usual once the fear has settled.
France (La Hague reprocessing facility) 1 quintillion becquerels (2021)Canada (Darlington Nuclear Power Plant) 190 trillion becquerels (2021)UK (Sellafield reprocessing facility) 186 trillion becquerels (2020)China (Yangjiang Nuclear Power Plant) 112 trillion becquerels (2021)South Korea (Kori Nuclear Power Plant) 49 trillion becquerels (2021) Japan (Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant) 22 trillion becquerels (2023)
Let me expose the sophistry - the countries listed by this person discharge nuclear wastewater, which is not directly in contact with nuclear materials. While Japan's discharge this time is nuclear contaminated water. There was a nuclear leak at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and the nuclear material came into direct contact with seawater. If this nuclear contaminated water is truly purified to safety standards, why do the Japanese need to discharge it into the sea?
What do you want to clarify? Do you know the difference between nuclear wastewater and nuclear sewage? Is Japan discharging nuclear wastewater? This is the essential difference.
Cancer .. cancer for everyone .
The amount of radiation in the water is about the same as tap water. Second you say that on your phone/laptop which is currently emmiting radiation
@@kriegenjoyer6913 Someone needs to educate themselves. Tritium causes brain cancer you can't filter tritium. Cell phone radiation is different. Clown. Educate yourself.
A catastrophe gets started. Why does nobody stop this decision by some idiots...
The United States supports Japan in doing so
中国和韩国一直在阻止，但是日本有美国和欧盟的支持
如果我们用俄罗斯的方案，用氢弹吧日本核污水存放点炸平，西方国家会怎么说？你们不动手，也不会让我们，那就一起等死吧。😊
We in China have banned the import of Japanese seafood from today. Hong Kong tightened import controls, and Macau began a complete ban on all Japanese seafood products.